Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Wrestling Board => Topic started by: Montague on April 15, 2009, 08:41:12 PM
-
http://www.hack-man.com/Wrestling/NewsArticles/1994xxxx-hulk-roids.html (http://www.hack-man.com/Wrestling/NewsArticles/1994xxxx-hulk-roids.html)
-
Good post, i've never seen that. Some of those questions are retarted lol.
: Being on the road, when the wrestlers were offstage were they boisterous
Do you still refer to your arms as pythons when in character?
Is one of your lines for the Ric Flair PPV (said in a Hulk Hogan voice) whats you gonna do Ric Flair when these pythons come after you
Also, i think Hogan didn't come off until 92. Thats' when he realy started to lose size. That whole trial was a waste of time and $$.
-
Good post, i've never seen that. Some of those questions are retarted lol.
: Being on the road, when the wrestlers were offstage were they boisterous
Do you still refer to your arms as pythons when in character?
Is one of your lines for the Ric Flair PPV (said in a Hulk Hogan voice) whats you gonna do Ric Flair when these pythons come after you
Also, i think Hogan didn't come off until 92. Thats' when he realy started to lose size. That whole trial was a waste of time and $$.
Agreed. In WCW he got some what small. Deca & Anavar stack for sure like he stated in his trial.
-
Glad you liked it.
Yeah,
I also feel that the trial – like the entire “war on drugs” – was a waste.
But while many of Hulk’s questions seemed irrelevant, I know that many attorneys and DA’s intertwine that type with relevant ones as a way to gauge the person’s responses to see which topics are answered honestly and comfortably vs. dishonest/anxious.
Sneaky pricks.
-
This is a pretty good read, too:
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20112274,00.html (http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20112274,00.html)
-
Glad you liked it.
Yeah,
I also feel that the trial – like the entire “war on drugs” – was a waste.
But while many of Hulk’s questions seemed irrelevant, I know that many attorneys and DA’s intertwine that type with relevant ones as a way to gauge the person’s responses to see which topics are answered honestly and comfortably vs. dishonest/anxious.
Sneaky pricks.
Bullseye.
-
I recently came across these clips.
Rather than start another thread, I thought they’d fit quite nicely right here:
-
-
That whole read was very interesting. So were the wrestlers testimonys if you google it up on the net.
-
That whole read was very interesting. So were the wrestlers testimonys if you google it up on the net.
Piper’s was the most entertaining.
Did you catch Lyle Alzado in the last clip referring to hGH as a steroid, and attributing his anabolics use to his cancer?
Maybe it did contribute, but it’s a little non-sequitur to suggest that everyone who uses juice will end up like him, or Graham, etc.
And as far as the Larry King clips, yeah – Vince had some tough questions to answer and some of his responses were a little thin, but I think he held his ground and even discredited Bruno more than the other way around.
I still insist that Bruno was bitter over his kid never becoming anything more than an underneath guy.
-
Piper’s was the most entertaining.
Did you catch Lyle Alzado in the last clip referring to hGH as a steroid, and attributing his anabolics use to his cancer?
Maybe it did contribute, but it’s a little non-sequitur to suggest that everyone who uses juice will end up like him, or Graham, etc.
And as far as the Larry King clips, yeah – Vince had some tough questions to answer and some of his responses were a little thin, but I think he held his ground and even discredited Bruno more than the other way around.
I still insist that Bruno was bitter over his kid never becoming anything more than an underneath guy.
Any wrestler who never made it in the WWE has had a bone to pick with Vince.