Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Special Ed on September 02, 2009, 12:06:28 AM

Title: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: Special Ed on September 02, 2009, 12:06:28 AM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).

Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: gordiano on September 02, 2009, 12:18:24 AM
Good to have you back here again, my Getbig Brother....
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 02, 2009, 12:23:43 AM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).




Spot On.

All Heath has to do is Not Fuck It Up and he's in.

Then again, that didn't seem to hinder Jay all that much :P
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: TechnoViking on September 02, 2009, 12:24:43 AM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).



So Bob Chick doesn't have any top 10 power?
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: aliamini on September 02, 2009, 12:27:55 AM
 ;D ;D ;D

I think Vic should win ... but ur point is much more valid than the actual judging criteria

Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The_Hammer on September 02, 2009, 12:31:27 AM
Dexter doesn't promote bodybuilding the way Jay did.

Either Jay or Phil would make better ambassadors than Dexter.
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on September 02, 2009, 02:51:07 AM
Ronnie coleman isnt competing though
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: io856 on September 02, 2009, 02:53:21 AM
Ronnie coleman isnt competing though
the point was made though  :)
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: RxBandit on September 02, 2009, 02:53:38 AM
Ronnie coleman isnt competing though

Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 07:36:54 AM


  That pretty much sums it up to a T.

 The Mr. Olympia has NOTHING to do with who has the best physique.



 - Block!
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: JasonH on September 02, 2009, 07:44:04 AM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).



Post of the year.  8)

We've missed you Special Ed.
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: tendonitis on September 02, 2009, 07:46:42 AM
I bet that list is DEAD ON.  The Olympia is the biggest bullshit contest of the year.
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 09:51:18 AM
I bet that list is DEAD ON.  The Olympia is the biggest bullshit contest of the year.
QFT.


 Why we debate about this shit is beyond me. It's 100% scripted and pre-digested.



 - Block!
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Bodybuilding Related on September 02, 2009, 10:00:31 AM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).



Ha ha, funny how it kinda really does break down like that...
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Tre on September 02, 2009, 10:04:25 AM

lol @ Blechman sponsors more events

Good to see you again, S. Ed.
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 02, 2009, 10:04:57 AM
QFT.


 Why we debate about this shit is beyond me. It's 100% scripted and pre-digested.



 - Block!
the executive producer wants to make money
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Wiggs on September 02, 2009, 10:18:16 AM
Great list but it won't go like this.
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Cleanest Natural on September 02, 2009, 10:45:35 AM

if it's not photoshopped

wtf???????????
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 02, 2009, 10:56:21 AM
QFT.


 Why we debate about this shit is beyond me. It's 100% scripted and pre-digested.



 - Block!

Let's get this straight, the judges are point blank told how to place the guys? Or are the scores changed when they are turned in? Who exactly are the shot callers who decide the winner? Is it the head sponsor? Or AMI? Weider?

If it's just politics, why the hell did they give the title to Dexter? Makes no sense to me.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 11:12:41 AM
Let's get this straight, the judges are point blank told how to place the guys? Or are the scores changed when they are turned in? Who exactly are the shot callers who decide the winner? Is it the head sponsor? Or AMI? Weider?

If it's just politics, why the hell did they give the title to Dexter? Makes no sense to me.
Well, they have to give the head sponsor's athlete a high placing as a 'thank you' for production costs etc...

 If the guy isn't with AMI?Weider he stands no chance at winning. It's their contest and say if a Dennis Wolfe won it as he is with MD do you think Blechman is going to let AMI/Weider showcase him in Flex? No. Never. Not a chance. So why would they let someone els win knowing that the competition will put him on lockdown?


 Are the scores changed? Yes. Absolutely. It's done in a way to cover their tracks in case a competitor wants to challenge anybody. They have the score cards to prove it.

 The judges are told how to place the guys based on lots of factors. This whole contest is a complete sham. The guys who place from 8th and down are probably judged fairly, though.

 The title was given to Dexter because if a Jay won again as he was so obviously out of shape then it would have been a buisness-as-usual thing and they would expect tickets and attendence to be down this year as we are tired of seeing the same guy win over and over. They gave it to Dexter because nobody can argue it... it created the illusion that the Mr. Olympia is judged on physique and not politics and to create the hype for 2009 as Jay will try to regain his title and the Olympia is open for anybody this time blah blah blah...


 It is all a big orchestrated buisness move.



 - Block.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: delta9mda on September 02, 2009, 11:21:56 AM
i got a bridge to sell someone ;D

im calling bullshit till the show is over, then we can discuss.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 11:36:50 AM
i got a bridge to sell someone ;D

im calling bullshit till the show is over, then we can discuss.
Is it the San Fransisco bridge? If so then I'll buy it. I want to paint it the rainbow gay pride colors. (no homo!)


 - Block!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: tbombz on September 02, 2009, 11:40:00 AM
Is it the San Fransisco bridge? If so then I'll buy it. I want to paint it the rainbow gay pride colors. (no homo!)


 - Block!
trying to hard here, blocky block block.

by the way flexington told me you were an EMT  now your a paramedic. you like the job? how do the hours and schedule fit with liftign and eating. whats the pay
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Big_Tymer on September 02, 2009, 12:51:53 PM
QFT.


 Why we debate about this shit is beyond me. It's 100% scripted and pre-digested.



 - Block!

no shit.  only the naive believe the title is truly "up for grabs, anyones game"  ::)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: MAXX on September 02, 2009, 03:13:46 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 02, 2009, 03:21:12 PM
Are the scores changed? Yes. Absolutely. It's done in a way to cover their tracks in case a competitor wants to challenge anybody. They have the score cards to prove it.

So the judges themselves are not in on it?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 03:22:34 PM
So the judges themselves are not in on it?
They do what they are told. Most judges feel so privlidged to be sitting at the judges table they will practically do anything to be a part of the network.



 - Block!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: tendonitis on September 02, 2009, 03:28:19 PM
They do what they are told. Most judges feel so privlidged to be sitting at the judges table they will practically do anything to be a part of the network.



 - Block!

and a lot of the judges are contest promoters themselves so they suck up to the supplement companies in hopes they will sponsor their show.  it's all a big circle jerk of political bullshit
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 02, 2009, 03:38:18 PM
They do what they are told. Most judges feel so privlidged to be sitting at the judges table they will practically do anything to be a part of the network.



 - Block!

With so many involved in the conspiracy it would seem to me that it's hard to keep it secret, especially over time. I'm just curious as to how the fix is orchestrated in reality.

Who were the judges for the 2008 O for example? Hasn't Dorian judged a few?

Milos does claim Bob's Masters win was a fix. If he could bring hard proof it would ruin the IFBB.  If all the judges are in on it one of them will talk eventually - that's what I think.

But then again, thousands of Jews were in on 9/11 and not one of them has talked yet.  :D
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 02, 2009, 06:06:20 PM


 Are the scores changed? Yes. Absolutely. It's done in a way to cover their tracks in case a competitor wants to challenge anybody. They have the score cards to prove it.

 It is all a big orchestrated buisness move.



 - Block.

Actually block i think u might be right on this, i remember speaking to Jim last year when he was training King for the Atlantic City Pro. He said right before the finals someone came to king with a scoresheet and told him to get ready for the final posedown because he was in the top 5. So King was all pumped up, then out of nowhere someone tells him there was a "mistake" and he was actually in 6th and not 5th.

But what happened to that old scorecard? all of the sudden it couldnt be found. But coincidentally 4 out of the 5 top athletes in that posedown were muscletech athletes, and two of them were ones who had yet to qualify for the olympia and did because of that show, which was the last of the year.

Now I know its King and he has a retardedly funky lookin physique, but he did look top five last year at that show. especially compared to joel stubbs who placed ahead of him, and only has half a body.

Do i think the IFBB is shady, of course I do, just look at Jay's 07  olympia win.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: YoungBlood on September 02, 2009, 06:33:05 PM
Is it the San Fransisco bridge? If so then I'll buy it. I want to paint it the rainbow gay pride colors. (no homo!)


 - Block!

There's three bridges around the SF Bay Area, more if you start reaching a bit farther out but not technically in the Bay Area.....

Golden Gate Bridge, Richmond-San Rafael and the Bay Bridge.

Which would you like to choose?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 02, 2009, 06:38:43 PM
Actually block i think u might be right on this, i remember speaking to Jim last year when he was training King for the Atlantic City Pro. He said right before the finals someone came to king with a scoresheet and told him to get ready for the final posedown because he was in the top 5. So King was all pumped up, then out of nowhere someone tells him there was a "mistake" and he was actually in 6th and not 5th.

But what happened to that old scorecard? all of the sudden it couldnt be found. But coincidentally 4 out of the 5 top athletes in that posedown were muscletech athletes, and two of them were ones who had yet to qualify for the olympia and did because of that show, which was the last of the year.

Now I know its King and he has a retardedly funky lookin physique, but he did look top five last year at that show. especially compared to joel stubbs who placed ahead of him, and only has half a body.

Do i think the IFBB is shady, of course I do, just look at Jay's 07  olympia win.
oh brother to the queen kamali part ::)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 02, 2009, 06:47:47 PM
With so many involved in the conspiracy it would seem to me that it's hard to keep it secret, especially over time. I'm just curious as to how the fix is orchestrated in reality.

Who were the judges for the 2008 O for example? Hasn't Dorian judged a few?

Milos does claim Bob's Masters win was a fix. If he could bring hard proof it would ruin the IFBB.  If all the judges are in on it one of them will talk eventually - that's what I think.

But then again, thousands of Jews were in on 9/11 and not one of them has talked yet.  :D


Yeah, and when asked for proof...he mysteriously disappeared, as usual.

As for your "eventually, one will speak..."..LOL....when? Conspiracy theories and cries of "fix" have been around since the first Olympia in 65.....are you still waiting for one to come forward after 44 years?

Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 02, 2009, 07:33:07 PM
There's three bridges around the SF Bay Area, more if you start reaching a bit farther out but not technically in the Bay Area.....

Golden Gate Bridge, Richmond-San Rafael and the Bay Bridge.

Which would you like to choose?
The ones that is closest to the gayest part of the city. Lots of cool bars and clubs in those areas I want to check out. (no homo!)



 - Block!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 02, 2009, 07:38:49 PM
The ones that is closest to the gayest part of the city. Lots of cool bars and clubs in those areas I want to check out. (no homo!)



 - Block!

Im 45 min away from Frisco, cool town, full of bitches, great food, crazy people, and flaming homo's.

Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 02, 2009, 07:41:07 PM
Im 45 min away from Frisco, cool town, full of bitches, great food, crazy people, and flaming homo's.


u sound hot too honey
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 02, 2009, 07:42:23 PM
u sound hot too honey

Im not that hot, i just have a horse like cock.  :-*

Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: YoungBlood on September 02, 2009, 08:27:08 PM
Im not that hot, i just have a horse like cock.  :-*

And apparently an ego to match.

The ones that is closest to the gayest part of the city. Lots of cool bars and clubs in those areas I want to check out. (no homo!)
 - Block!

That could be 2 of the 3. The Golden Gate will pretty much dump you off in the Marina (or towards the Sunset), and you'll have to spend 10min or so driving into the Castro area where the homos you seek are located.
The Bay Bridge (the one that collapsed in the 89 quake) will dump you off a few seconds from there now that the freeway is back up and running though still not what it was prior to the quake.
Really, the question is best answered off of where you're coming from.
*not meant to be too serious, I realize you're just fuckin' around anyways...*
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 03, 2009, 03:04:55 AM

Yeah, and when asked for proof...he mysteriously disappeared, as usual.

As for your "eventually, one will speak..."..LOL....when? Conspiracy theories and cries of "fix" have been around since the first Olympia in 65.....are you still waiting for one to come forward after 44 years?



I'm not waiting on anything as I'm not the one making the claim. What I'm saying is that if there is an overt fix like this it would be close to impossible to keep secret - too many people involved.

However, it's pretty apparent that Milos was right about Chua, he had been fixing contests for many years. But in this case it was apparently common knowledge - nothing was done about it is all.

Are pro contests outright fixed on US soil? I don't know. I'm inclined to think it's more that the judges are affected by the media like everyone else; who is hot right now and is promoted by the media is more likely to get a high placing. If Cutler had been a first time competitor in 2008 he likely would not have gotten 2nd. Judges assume he should be right up there since he won the prior year. They are blinded by the name.

I asked mike on musclemayhem about the politics and whether the judges are outright told what to do.
He said:
Quote
I don't think judges are TOLD what to do.

They do what they THINK they need to do.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: OneManGang on September 03, 2009, 03:24:17 AM
Special Ed belongs in the special olympics or gay olympics. He would fit in both
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on September 03, 2009, 03:36:10 AM
Special Ed belongs in the special olympics or gay olympics. He would fit in both
Is that right?
You are a one man gang bang,and you know what that means? You are a Wanker
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: OneManGang on September 03, 2009, 04:09:30 AM
Is that right?
You are a one man gang bang,and you know what that means? You are a Wanker

And that is coming from a certified gay man... ::)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Determinator on September 03, 2009, 04:10:52 AM
The judges are very fair and accurate in pro bodybuilding, especially the O. When it all comes down, the places are warrented. Okay, perhaps excusing Wolf's gift placing of 4th last year.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on September 03, 2009, 04:14:37 AM
And that is coming from a certified gay man... ::)
Ive never had gay sex of any kind
Ive never wnted gay sex of any kind
I have sex with a girl,and always have fucked girls
But if it makes you feel better,or less fat,to call me gay then knock yourself out man
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: HugeAl on September 03, 2009, 04:43:33 AM
Special Ed bringing the quality back  8)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 05:37:12 AM
I'm not waiting on anything as I'm not the one making the claim. What I'm saying is that if there is an overt fix like this it would be close to impossible to keep secret - too many people involved.

However, it's pretty apparent that Milos was right about Chua, he had been fixing contests for many years. But in this case it was apparently common knowledge - nothing was done about it is all.

Are pro contests outright fixed on US soil? I don't know. I'm inclined to think it's more that the judges are affected by the media like everyone else; who is hot right now and is promoted by the media is more likely to get a high placing. If Cutler had been a first time competitor in 2008 he likely would not have gotten 2nd. Judges assume he should be right up there since he won the prior year. They are blinded by the name.

I asked mike on musclemayhem about the politics and whether the judges are outright told what to do.
He said:

Tis post is a far cry from your first which I responded to...
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 03, 2009, 05:50:13 AM
Tis post is a far cry from your first which I responded to...

Then I wasn't being clear. I said "Milos does claim..."
If the contests are fixed I don't see how it can be kept a secret.

Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 06:07:11 AM
Some bodybuilders were placed low because of politics. Bev Francis is one and Sergio Oliva is another and Rusty Jeffers is the latest victim. Bev was the best by far in 83 in Las Vegas but was placed 8th because her level of muscular development was considered by Ben to be bad for the sport. Sergio and Rusty were also placed 8th in a major contest.

The judges know that whoever is in the first call out should be placed 1st, 2nd and 3rd, not necessarily in that order. The deviation method of assessing judges will discredit any judge who places people out of sync with the majority.

There is also time between the prejudging and the finals to make adjustments with deviating judges.

The whole network in the IFBB is hand picked to maintain consistency and 'validity'. It is a fairly easy matter to select judges who favour certain athletes. Am I suggesting this sort of thing happened in the IFBB? That would be unimaginable!  
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 06:14:14 AM
Then I wasn't being clear. I said "Milos does claim..."
If the contests are fixed I don't see how it can be kept a secret.



They're not, and there wont be anyone coming forward claiming they are as they don't exsist...

Not quite sure what you're trying to say...your first post seems to indicate that you agree that they are fixed and that EVENTUALLy someone will come forward....then you seem to take a step back from that stance....now you seem to agree that it's near impossible.

Perhaps I read your post wrong?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: OneManGang on September 03, 2009, 06:27:25 AM
Ive never had gay sex of any kind
Ive never wnted gay sex of any kind
I have sex with a girl,and always have fucked girls
But if it makes you feel better,or less fat,to call me gay then knock yourself out man

meltdown! :o
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 03, 2009, 07:21:13 AM

 I wonder how many IFBB/NPC judges and various talking heads have already viewed this thread from their blackberrys. More than likely all of them...



 - Block!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 03, 2009, 08:12:30 AM
They're not, and there wont be anyone coming forward claiming they are as they don't exsist...

Not quite sure what you're trying to say...your first post seems to indicate that you agree that they are fixed and that EVENTUALLy someone will come forward....then you seem to take a step back from that stance....now you seem to agree that it's near impossible.

Perhaps I read your post wrong?

I meant that IF they are fixed it would be impossible to keep secret, especially over time. Eventually someone WOULD come forward - if that was the case.

I have a hard time believing the O is fixed outright, but then again I'm not involved in any way and don't have special insight.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Mons Venus on September 03, 2009, 08:24:05 AM
IFBB is more fixed than the WWE.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 03, 2009, 10:34:34 AM
I've personally witnessed the head judge at an IFBB Pro show crossing out another judge's scores and putting in his own. It happened at the 2002 Night of Champions where I was sitting in the first row, directly behind the judges table. King Kamali's scores were being downgraded and Craig Titus's scores were being upgraded.
For anyone who hasn't personally witnessed this, one merely has to look at any of the "come from behind" Olympia victories...I mean sheesh, this isn't a horserace or a baseball game! When Cutler leads and Ronnie "overtakes him" or Victor leads and Cutler "surpasses him at the night show," what more do you need to see?

AMI/Weider DOES pre-select the winner because it is THEIR show - look at the signage:'Joe Weider's Mr. Olympia'. Would Steve Blechman 'let' Phil Heath win if the show was the MD Olympia and he couldn't use Phil's likeness or image for the next year in his magazines? Of course not.

Look at Dexter, who suddenly won the Olympia conveniently and immediately after he agreed to "jump" from MD to AMI/Weider.

Simply stated, Joe Weider and his legacy cannot and will not allow the Mr. Olympia title (that HE CREATED) to be used to EXCLUDE his own magazines from covering the winner. It's nothing more than common sense and capitalism. It's no more random than HALO WARS being an XBox exclusive.

HTH!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: BIG_STI on September 03, 2009, 11:02:53 AM
What a joke this "sport" is. Although I'm sure that tool Chick will be blowing flames at this thread.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Mons Venus on September 03, 2009, 11:06:31 AM
I've personally witnessed the head judge at an IFBB Pro show crossing out another judge's scores and putting in his own. It happened at the 2002 Night of Champions where I was sitting in the first row, directly behind the judges table. King Kamali's scores were being downgraded and Craig Titus's scores were being upgraded.
For anyone who hasn't personally witnessed this, one merely has to look at any of the "come from behind" Olympia victories...I mean sheesh, this isn't a horserace or a baseball game! When Cutler leads and Ronnie "overtakes him" or Victor leads and Cutler "surpasses him at the night show," what more do you need to see?

AMI/Weider DOES pre-select the winner because it is THEIR show - look at the signage:'Joe Weider's Mr. Olympia'. Would Steve Blechman 'let' Phil Heath win if the show was the MD Olympia and he couldn't use Phil's likeness or image for the next year in his magazines? Of course not.

Look at Dexter, who suddenly won the Olympia conveniently and immediately after he agreed to "jump" from MD to AMI/Weider.

Simply stated, Joe Weider and his legacy cannot and will not allow the Mr. Olympia title (that HE CREATED) to be used to EXCLUDE his own magazines from covering the winner. It's nothing more than common sense and capitalism. It's no more random than HALO WARS being an XBox exclusive.

HTH!

Great sport man!! ;D
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: stuntmovie on September 03, 2009, 11:38:42 AM
ED, It will be interesting to see if the official results are somewhat consistent with your forecast. Do you still stand by your initial input?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 11:46:52 AM
I've personally witnessed the head judge at an IFBB Pro show crossing out another judge's scores and putting in his own. It happened at the 2002 Night of Champions where I was sitting in the first row, directly behind the judges table. King Kamali's scores were being downgraded and Craig Titus's scores were being upgraded.
For anyone who hasn't personally witnessed this, one merely has to look at any of the "come from behind" Olympia victories...I mean sheesh, this isn't a horserace or a baseball game! When Cutler leads and Ronnie "overtakes him" or Victor leads and Cutler "surpasses him at the night show," what more do you need to see?

AMI/Weider DOES pre-select the winner because it is THEIR show - look at the signage:'Joe Weider's Mr. Olympia'. Would Steve Blechman 'let' Phil Heath win if the show was the MD Olympia and he couldn't use Phil's likeness or image for the next year in his magazines? Of course not.

Look at Dexter, who suddenly won the Olympia conveniently and immediately after he agreed to "jump" from MD to AMI/Weider.

Simply stated, Joe Weider and his legacy cannot and will not allow the Mr. Olympia title (that HE CREATED) to be used to EXCLUDE his own magazines from covering the winner. It's nothing more than common sense and capitalism. It's no more random than HALO WARS being an XBox exclusive.

HTH!

Yet Ronnie won while not on board as a Weider athlete, as did Dorian Yates...and somehow Sergio beat out Arnold in 69 even though Weider had Arnold under contract and was considered the golden boy
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: YoungBlood on September 03, 2009, 11:55:33 AM
Yet Ronnie won while not on board as a Weider athlete,

Flex Wheeler always made the connection that Ronnie was with Met-Rx at the end of his contract, so while not being with Weider when Ronnie won, he was AVAILABLE to sign afterwords and we all know he did. But the first ads of Ronnie with an Olympia trophy showed him wearing a Met-Rx hat.
I think there are parts that seem to be true, but also other parts that are full of holes.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 12:15:47 PM
Flex Wheeler always made the connection that Ronnie was with Met-Rx at the end of his contract, so while not being with Weider when Ronnie won, he was AVAILABLE to sign afterwords and we all know he did. But the first ads of Ronnie with an Olympia trophy showed him wearing a Met-Rx hat.
I think there are parts that seem to be true, but also other parts that are full of holes.





Anyone is "available" AFTER their contract...

Of course there are holes, especially in all these ridiculous conspiracy theories...convenient when the guess is right, but explained away when the guess is wrong.

Phil is a MetRx athletes, but also a AMI athlete...

Muscletech isn't title sponsor this year, so I guess you can all throw out that angle...

Ultimate Nutrition is title sponsor, and has Markus Ruhl in the show....if he wins, now you got something...

Victor is with MHP and MD...if he wins, you guys REALLY dint have anything to say

Same with Kai Greene...

If Jay regains the title, then I guess its a AMI thing since you dint have MT to cry foul this year..

Dex repeating as the champ throws out your Phil fix scenario...but I guess you can still fall back on the AMI contract...



Allegedly,the fix was in back in 2001 when Jay was touted to beat Ronnie to boost ticket sales and set up a rematch....but Ronnie ended up winning....

Gunter beats Ronnie at the GNC SOS as he's supposed to go on to the Olympia Title....but he ends up losing there as well.

Flex Wheeler was all but declared the winner as a Weider athlete....but got beat by Ronnie who was with MetRx and nowhere near the top 5 the year before...

Ronnie was allegedly guaranteed victory number 9, but ended up losing to Cutler...


Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: dr.chimps on September 03, 2009, 12:17:54 PM
Chickster? Stop making sense.    >:(
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 03, 2009, 01:52:36 PM

Phil is a MetRx athletes, but also a AMI athlete...

Muscletech isn't title sponsor this year, so I guess you can all throw out that angle...

Ultimate Nutrition is title sponsor, and has Markus Ruhl in the show....if he wins, now you got something...

Victor is with MHP and MD...if he wins, you guys REALLY dint have anything to say

Same with Kai Greene...

If Jay regains the title, then I guess its a AMI thing since you dint have MT to cry foul this year..

Dex repeating as the champ throws out your Phil fix scenario...but I guess you can still fall back on the AMI contract...

Allegedly,the fix was in back in 2001 when Jay was touted to beat Ronnie to boost ticket sales and set up a rematch....but Ronnie ended up winning....

Gunter beats Ronnie at the GNC SOS as he's supposed to go on to the Olympia Title....but he ends up losing there as well.

Flex Wheeler was all but declared the winner as a Weider athlete....but got beat by Ronnie who was with MetRx and nowhere near the top 5 the year before...

Ronnie was allegedly guaranteed victory number 9, but ended up losing to Cutler...
Mixing apples and grapefruits my friend. I am talking about the only business Weider has left, which is his magazines/Olympia. No one said anything about Weider supplements (if they're still around). And regarding Ultimate Nutrition...yes, a 15th place worthy Markus Ruhl will definitely make the top ten this year if UN is the title sponsor!

Again, the issue is black and white.

So if Bob could please answer this:

Do you honestly believe the judges would EVER turn over EXCLUSIVE control over the MR. OLYMPIA title to STEVE BLECHMAN and MUSCULAR DEVELOPMENT and leave FLEX Magazine with ZERO ability to interview, feature, or otherwise take non-contest photographs of Mr. Olympia for one or more years?

My opinion: It has never happened. And it never will.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: DK II on September 03, 2009, 01:54:40 PM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson);
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler);
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).



DAMN!


Mods, please make this a sticky for eternity. Best post EVER on getbig.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 03, 2009, 03:48:38 PM
I've personally witnessed the head judge at an IFBB Pro show crossing out another judge's scores and putting in his own. It happened at the 2002 Night of Champions where I was sitting in the first row, directly behind the judges table. King Kamali's scores were being downgraded and Craig Titus's scores were being upgraded.
For anyone who hasn't personally witnessed this, one merely has to look at any of the "come from behind" Olympia victories...I mean sheesh, this isn't a horserace or a baseball game! When Cutler leads and Ronnie "overtakes him" or Victor leads and Cutler "surpasses him at the night show," what more do you need to see?

AMI/Weider DOES pre-select the winner because it is THEIR show - look at the signage:'Joe Weider's Mr. Olympia'. Would Steve Blechman 'let' Phil Heath win if the show was the MD Olympia and he couldn't use Phil's likeness or image for the next year in his magazines? Of course not.

Look at Dexter, who suddenly won the Olympia conveniently and immediately after he agreed to "jump" from MD to AMI/Weider.

Simply stated, Joe Weider and his legacy cannot and will not allow the Mr. Olympia title (that HE CREATED) to be used to EXCLUDE his own magazines from covering the winner. It's nothing more than common sense and capitalism. It's no more random than HALO WARS being an XBox exclusive.

HTH!
too bad special jay doesnt post here more often, cos he SPEAKS THE TRUTH!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 04:01:22 PM
Mixing apples and grapefruits my friend. I am talking about the only business Weider has left, which is his magazines/Olympia. No one said anything about Weider supplements (if they're still around)

You're right...no one did mention Weider supplements (which are 99% based in Europe)...so why did you?




. And regarding Ultimate Nutrition...yes, a 15th place worthy Markus Ruhl will definitely make the top ten this year if UN is the title sponsor!


LOL.....OK. Guess you can spin that however you want and justifys your position.

So if Markus looks great and is deserving of top 10, then it's because of UN sponsor dollars...
If he looks like he should be 15th and places 14th, you'll point the finger to the sponsor...

Again, the issue is black and white.

So if Bob could please answer this:

Do you honestly believe the judges would EVER turn over EXCLUSIVE control over the MR. OLYMPIA title to STEVE BLECHMAN and MUSCULAR DEVELOPMENT and leave FLEX Magazine with ZERO ability to interview, feature, or otherwise take non-contest photographs of Mr. Olympia for one or more years?


You put WAY to much emphasis to something that doesnt mean a hell of a lot....there is no "ecxclusive" these days...everyone does interviews (be it through supp ads or 3rd party)  Jay had a "column" in MD for years even though he was under contract with AMI...Muscletech puts 14 page spreads/ ads in EVERY publication with titles of "How I won the Olympia", etc....

Jay/ Dex/ Phil, etc have all been on MD/MM/Ironman, etc numerous times...
My opinion: It has never happened. And it never will.


You're entitled to your opinion...and when it does happen...you'll be ready with yet another spin as to why.

BTW...I noticed you didnt have a chance to respond to my post you quoted, tackling the many conspiracies over the years (or lack therof)...I'm sure it was just an oversight
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on September 03, 2009, 04:13:58 PM
great posts ed finally the truth is revealed
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: tendonitis on September 03, 2009, 04:21:44 PM
Chick, we all saw the 07 Olympia debacle.  We're not stupid.  The Olympia is not a contest, it's an AMI marketing tool. 
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on September 03, 2009, 04:27:07 PM
Has anyone seen Pumping Iron 2?

There is a scene where Ben Weider tells the judges to mark down competitors showing signs of being too muscular. That isn't influencing the judging? Some put Bev in 1st, some put her last.

As for Chick, he bitched and moaned when they wouldn't compare him to Titus (and being placed below him), despite saying every show he was compared to Titus he beat him. So there's nothing wrong with the judging Chick?  ;)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 04:55:16 PM
Has anyone seen Pumping Iron 2?

There is a scene where Ben Weider tells the judges to mark down competitors showing signs of being too muscular. That isn't influencing the judging? Some put Bev in 1st, some put her last.

As for Chick, he bitched and moaned when they wouldn't compare him to Titus (and being placed below him), despite saying every show he was compared to Titus he beat him. So there's nothing wrong with the judging Chick?  ;)


Judging is subjective in BB and based on opinion, that said, what your talking about differs greatly in that complaining about lack of comparisons is a world away from "fixing " shows...and something I've campaigned for (and gotten approval) ever since...

Concerning Bev....Ben was the pres of the IFBB...giving direction as to what the criteria is suppossed to be, is expected and as Pres, he has every right to do so.

 I dont recall Ben ever having any discussions as to SPECIFIC competitors being placed in any particular order...



Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 03, 2009, 05:18:08 PM
Bob,

You brought up Weider supplements when you said that Ronnie Coleman wasn't with Weider when he won the O. Back then, Weider publishing was the only magazine that paid for exclusivity. Ronnie Coleman was NOT under contract with a competing magazine. And it should be noted that shortly after winning the O, Ronnie suddenly dumped Met-Rx and became a Weider-exclusive athlete. Was the deal between Coleman and Weider agreed to in principle BEFORE the 1998 Olympia just as the Dexter Jackson-AMI deal was agreed to PRIOR to Dexter winning the 2008 Olympia? Hmmm...

I appreciate your loyalty to the powerbrokers who have been good to you, but as I have said: I have seen Olympia judges (at non-Olympia shows) ALTERING SCORECARDS of other judges to achieve SPECIFIC RESULTS. That meets most peoples, gamblers, and casinos definition of 'fixing'.

Don't get me started on Dorian Yates. The guy became best buds with the Head Olympia judge, stayed at his house for two weeks prior to the O each year, and won the Olympia while missing an entire major bodypart in the biggest disgrace of Olympia 'competition' ever.

Anyway, if Markus Ruhl places out of the top ten this year, a Bob Bowl at the Firehouse is on me!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 05:30:48 PM
Bob,

You brought up Weider supplements when you said that Ronnie Coleman wasn't with Weider when he won the O. Back then, Weider publishing was the only magazine that paid for exclusivity. Ronnie Coleman was NOT under contract with a competing magazine. And it should be noted that shortly after winning the O, Ronnie suddenly dumped Met-Rx and became a Weider-exclusive athlete. Was the deal between Coleman and Weider agreed to in principle BEFORE the 1998 Olympia just as the Dexter Jackson-AMI deal was agreed to PRIOR to Dexter winning the 2008 Olympia? Hmmm...

I appreciate your loyalty to the powerbrokers who have been good to you, but as I have said: I have seen Olympia judges (at non-Olympia shows) ALTERING SCORECARDS of other judges to achieve SPECIFIC RESULTS. That meets most peoples, gamblers, and casinos definition of 'fixing'.

Don't get me started on Dorian Yates. The guy became best buds with the Head Olympia judge, stayed at his house for two weeks prior to the O each year, and won the Olympia while missing an entire major bodypart in the biggest disgrace of Olympia 'competition' ever.

Anyway, if Markus Ruhl places out of the top ten this year, a Bob Bowl at the Firehouse is on me!

Weider supps and Weider pubs are two different entities....point being...Ronnie wasnt with EITHER when he won the O...beating a much heralded WEIDER athlete who was under contract...Flex Wheeler.


Who knows what you've seen...unless you were actually ON the judging panel, chances are, you didnt see what you thought....or.....you seen what you wanted to see,

I didnt agree with the Dorian decision on a few occasions, nor the FRanco81 decision, Haney winning over Labrada in 89, or all of Colemans wins.....doesnt mean the shows are predetermined, just that the judges seen a different result than we did.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on September 03, 2009, 05:33:53 PM
Experts on ESPN picked Jay. Anyone else see that?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 07:02:48 PM

Who knows what you've seen...unless you were actually ON the judging panel, chances are, you didnt see what you thought....or.....you seen what you wanted to see,


This is vintage Manion sophistry to make the IFBB sound authentic. The IFBB patsy, stooge, and informer Bob Chick is recruited to save the Pro League.

Special Ed gives us an anecdotal report telling us what he saw. This is good enough for me. However, we should remain sceptical because Special Ed might have been mistaken about what he saw. He thought he saw a head judge cross out a score and replace it with his own. Yep, that sounds like what happens. The errant judge had to be corrected by the head judge. Bob calls Jim and asks what to post to discredit Special Ed. Voila, the quote above. This is the theatre of the absurd for sure.

We can imagine what happened in the Masters Pro. Poor Rusty was relegated to 8th and wasn't compared with the guys who won. Great to have mates who are running the contest you are in, right Chick?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 07:10:30 PM
This is vintage Manion sophistry to make the IFBB sound authentic. The IFBB patsy, stooge, and informer Bob Chick is recruited to save the Pro League.

Special Ed gives us an anecdotal report telling us what he saw. This is good enough for me. However, we should remain sceptical because Special Ed might have been mistaken about what he saw. He thought he saw a head judge cross out a score and replace it with his own. Yep, that sounds like what happens. The errant judge had to be corrected by the head judge. Bob calls Jim and asks what to post to discredit Special Ed. Voila, the quote above. This is the theatre of the absurd for sure.

We can imagine what happened in the Masters Pro. Poor Rusty was relegated to 8th and wasn't compared with the guys who won. Great to have mates who are running the contest you are in, right Chick?


LOL....vintage Basile...clueless in Australia

Unless Special Ed was sitting on the panel, or looking directly over the shoulder of the head judge (who doesn't cast a vot, BTW...) he would have no way to actually see what they were doing...just his own perception and interpretation. 

Are these the same "mates" Basile, that scored me out of the top 5 on occasion, or had me still competing in the amateurs?  Funny how it only fits your agenda when it suits you....

clown
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 07:11:05 PM

Judging is subjective in BB and based on opinion, that said, what your talking about differs greatly in that complaining about lack of comparisons is a world away from "fixing " shows...and something I've campaigned for (and gotten approval) ever since...

Concerning Bev....Ben was the pres of the IFBB...giving direction as to what the criteria is suppossed to be, is expected and as Pres, he has every right to do so.

 I dont recall Ben ever having any discussions as to SPECIFIC competitors being placed in any particular order...


Right here Bob Chick abandons all credibility and joins the IFBB as hatchet man and errand boy. What a joke that 1983 contest was in Las Vegas. The contest fixing has been recorded for posterity. Ben clearly instructed the judges not to let Bev Francis win. Who else was he referring to when he mentioned muscularity?  Bev never won the Ms Olympia no matter what she did.

The amusing thing is Bev would probably win now because of her association with Weinberger. There was hapless Steve lamenting Bev placing 8th in that contest won by Rachel McLish.  Ben did a bad thing that day and women's bodybuilding has been corrupt ever since.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 07:13:16 PM
According to IFBB logic I guess Special Ed is to blame for that controversial result that he commented on!!!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 03, 2009, 07:17:23 PM




Anyone is "available" AFTER their contract...

Of course there are holes, especially in all these ridiculous conspiracy theories...convenient when the guess is right, but explained away when the guess is wrong.

Phil is a MetRx athletes, but also a AMI athlete...

Muscletech isn't title sponsor this year, so I guess you can all throw out that angle...

Ultimate Nutrition is title sponsor, and has Markus Ruhl in the show....if he wins, now you got something...

Victor is with MHP and MD...if he wins, you guys REALLY dint have anything to say

Same with Kai Greene...

If Jay regains the title, then I guess its a AMI thing since you dint have MT to cry foul this year..

Dex repeating as the champ throws out your Phil fix scenario...but I guess you can still fall back on the AMI contract...



Allegedly,the fix was in back in 2001 when Jay was touted to beat Ronnie to boost ticket sales and set up a rematch....but Ronnie ended up winning....

Gunter beats Ronnie at the GNC SOS as he's supposed to go on to the Olympia Title....but he ends up losing there as well.

Flex Wheeler was all but declared the winner as a Weider athlete....but got beat by Ronnie who was with MetRx and nowhere near the top 5 the year before...

Ronnie was allegedly guaranteed victory number 9, but ended up losing to Cutler...




And Lee Haney jumps to Twinlab, but still wins number 8, back in the day.   
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 07:20:46 PM
Right here Bob Chick abandons all credibility and joins the IFBB as hatchet man and errand boy. What a joke that 1983 contest was in Las Vegas. The contest fixing has been recorded for posterity. Ben clearly instructed the judges not to let Bev Francis win. Who else was he referring to when he mentioned muscularity?  Bev never won the Ms Olympia no matter what she did.

The amusing thing is Bev would probably win now because of her association with Weinberger. There was hapless Steve lamenting Bev placing 8th in that contest won by Rachel McLish.  Ben did a bad thing that day and women's bodybuilding has been corrupt ever since.

Ben was trying to preserve what FBB should have been about...he didnt have to mention anyone in particular, it was a LOOK they were going for, and Bev didnt fit the look.

You can see how well FBB has done sionce, basile, as they gradually allowed more muscular and freakier women to place higher and higher...sadly, you're too stupid to see the obvious
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: disturbia on September 03, 2009, 07:22:08 PM
Ben was trying to preserve what FBB should have been about...he didnt have to mention anyone in particular, it was a LOOK they were going for, and Bev didnt fit the look.

You can see how well FBB has done sionce, basile, as they gradually allowed more muscular and freakier women to place higher and higher...sadly, you're too stupid to see the obvious

howeverrrr---is it obvious to see hes stupid?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 07:45:01 PM
Bob, spare us the IFBB justification bullshit. Bev was the best female bodybuilder that day by far and they placed her 8th. That was a disgrace and travesty. Bev later tried the 'feminine' approach and still didn't win. The women's events are more corrupt than the mens and that is saying something.

Why offend those of us who are not biased and corrupt like Bob Chick is?

Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 03, 2009, 07:52:26 PM
Bob, spare us the IFBB justification bullshit. Bev was the best female bodybuilder that day by far and they placed her 8th. That was a disgrace and travesty. Bev later tried the 'feminine' approach and still didn't win. The women's events are more corrupt than the mens and that is saying something.

Why offend those of us who are not biased and corrupt like Bob Chick is?




LOL....yeah, by far

As for Bev trying the "more feminine approach"....much like your ability to be attracted to a women less than 200 lbs., it aint going to happen
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 08:11:54 PM
What would you know about what I am attracted to in women? Women can be attractive at all sizes.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 03, 2009, 08:33:50 PM
Bob,

You brought up Weider supplements when you said that Ronnie Coleman wasn't with Weider when he won the O. Back then, Weider publishing was the only magazine that paid for exclusivity. Ronnie Coleman was NOT under contract with a competing magazine. And it should be noted that shortly after winning the O, Ronnie suddenly dumped Met-Rx and became a Weider-exclusive athlete. Was the deal between Coleman and Weider agreed to in principle BEFORE the 1998 Olympia just as the Dexter Jackson-AMI deal was agreed to PRIOR to Dexter winning the 2008 Olympia? Hmmm...

I appreciate your loyalty to the powerbrokers who have been good to you, but as I have said: I have seen Olympia judges (at non-Olympia shows) ALTERING SCORECARDS of other judges to achieve SPECIFIC RESULTS. That meets most peoples, gamblers, and casinos definition of 'fixing'.

Don't get me started on Dorian Yates. The guy became best buds with the Head Olympia judge, stayed at his house for two weeks prior to the O each year, and won the Olympia while missing an entire major bodypart in the biggest disgrace of Olympia 'competition' ever.

Anyway, if Markus Ruhl places out of the top ten this year, a Bob Bowl at the Firehouse is on me!

Are you suggesting Ronnie's 1998 win wasn't justified?  To use that example in the context you did would almost imply that.  Being that most would consider 1998 a clear win for Ronnie, I'd say your example loses steam fast.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 03, 2009, 08:40:40 PM
I was mistaken. The year was 2003, not 2002. The contest was the Night of Champions at the Beacon Theater. After much nagging, Wayne Demilia delivered us a pair of first row seats, directly behind the judges table. As the bodybuilders were being compared, I and a fellow longtime GB member leaned forward and snuck peeks at the scorecards. Sitting directly in front of me sat a young black judge, and on either side of him sat Steve Weinberger and the forementioned Bev Francis (Steve's wife). Both Steve and Bev took great interest in the middle guy's scoresheet, each of them reaching over at different times to cross off his numbers and insert their own onto his score sheet. I am pretty sure they weren't playing 'Guess my Age' or 'Tic Tac Toe'.   

Incidentally, our very own Bob took 6th that evening behind Victor (in his first win), Pavel Jablonicky, Titus, Kamali, and JOJ. This show was notable primarily because not only were Kamali and Titus mocking each other on stage but Kelly Ryan and Barb Kamali were screaming at the tops of their lungs every time the two were on stage together. All together, it made for  a pretty memorable prejudging and night show.

I still have a nice black and white photo I took of the top five, in which you can see the tops of the judges' heads in the forefront. But I'm sure the 'anti-conspiracy' theorist will probably claim it's been doctored by the Warren Commission.

Anyway, in all fairness and gayness, I don't really care that the show is fixed any more than I care if the Miss Universe is fixed. Like most schmoes, I'm there to look at the ebony and ivory moutains of salacious muscle, not bankrupt the Orleans Sportsbook, which for some strange reason won't take bets on the Olympia.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 03, 2009, 09:13:40 PM
Good thing Special Ed isn't a pro or he would be suspended for that allegation. I can imagine Steve doing that but not Bev. She must have been playing tic tac toe!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: TechnoViking on September 03, 2009, 09:17:57 PM
Good thing Special Ed isn't a pro or he would be suspended for that allegation. I can imagine Steve doing that but not Bev. She must have been playing tic tac toe!

Some of your posts are absolute GOLD Basile... ;)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: kiwiol on September 03, 2009, 09:20:03 PM
Ed, why don't you sign your name bracketing a custom phrase like before? It was a trademark and you should bring it back.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: io856 on September 03, 2009, 09:42:44 PM
Good thing Special Ed isn't a pro or he would be suspended for that allegation. I can imagine Steve doing that but not Bev. She must have been playing tic tac toe!
LOL!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 03, 2009, 10:04:11 PM
Good thing Special Ed isn't a pro or he would be suspended for that allegation. I can imagine Steve doing that but not Bev. She must have been playing tic tac toe!
It is possible that Bev and Steve were both playing Tic Tac Toe on the poor gentleman's scorecard...only using numbers instead of Xes and Os. Battleship, perhaps?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Big_Tymer on September 03, 2009, 10:11:24 PM
I was mistaken. The year was 2003, not 2002. The contest was the Night of Champions at the Beacon Theater. After much nagging, Wayne Demilia delivered us a pair of first row seats, directly behind the judges table. As the bodybuilders were being compared, I and a fellow longtime GB member leaned forward and snuck peeks at the scorecards. Sitting directly in front of me sat a young black judge, and on either side of him sat Steve Weinberger and the forementioned Bev Francis (Steve's wife). Both Steve and Bev took great interest in the middle guy's scoresheet, each of them reaching over at different times to cross off his numbers and insert their own onto his score sheet. I am pretty sure they weren't playing 'Guess my Age' or 'Tic Tac Toe'.   

Incidentally, our very own Bob took 6th that evening behind Victor (in his first win), Pavel Jablonicky, Titus, Kamali, and JOJ. This show was notable primarily because not only were Kamali and Titus mocking each other on stage but Kelly Ryan and Barb Kamali were screaming at the tops of their lungs every time the two were on stage together. All together, it made for  a pretty memorable prejudging and night show.

I still have a nice black and white photo I took of the top five, in which you can see the tops of the judges' heads in the forefront. But I'm sure the 'anti-conspiracy' theorist will probably claim it's been doctored by the Warren Commission.

Anyway, in all fairness and gayness, I don't really care that the show is fixed any more than I care if the Miss Universe is fixed. Like most schmoes, I'm there to look at the ebony and ivory moutains of salacious muscle, not bankrupt the Orleans Sportsbook, which for some strange reason won't take bets on the Olympia.

way too many details for this story to be fake.  IFBB fixes virtualy every contest, it is a fact
Title: Re: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Parker on September 03, 2009, 10:44:57 PM
Dexter doesn't promote bodybuilding the way Jay did.

Either Jay or Phil would make better ambassadors than Dexter.

What the Hell did Jay do? I'm amiss as to knoww because all i know was of the interview of him with a Las Vegas  news show prior to one of the Mr. O's, pics of his modded BMW 650i, which nobody complained about, yet people complained about Dex and his modded BMW 750i. Other than that, Jay has done the same as Dex has.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 03, 2009, 10:51:56 PM
Bob you are definetely a wonderful "company man" i have to give u that.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Smokincrazy on September 03, 2009, 10:59:18 PM
Great thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Special Ed glad to have you back.  Your a great contributer to Getbig
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Chick on September 04, 2009, 05:49:12 AM
I was mistaken. The year was 2003, not 2002. The contest was the Night of Champions at the Beacon Theater. After much nagging, Wayne Demilia delivered us a pair of first row seats, directly behind the judges table. As the bodybuilders were being compared, I and a fellow longtime GB member leaned forward and snuck peeks at the scorecards. Sitting directly in front of me sat a young black judge, and on either side of him sat Steve Weinberger and the forementioned Bev Francis (Steve's wife). Both Steve and Bev took great interest in the middle guy's scoresheet, each of them reaching over at different times to cross off his numbers and insert their own onto his score sheet. I am pretty sure they weren't playing 'Guess my Age' or 'Tic Tac Toe'.   

Incidentally, our very own Bob took 6th that evening behind Victor (in his first win), Pavel Jablonicky, Titus, Kamali, and JOJ. This show was notable primarily because not only were Kamali and Titus mocking each other on stage but Kelly Ryan and Barb Kamali were screaming at the tops of their lungs every time the two were on stage together. All together, it made for  a pretty memorable prejudging and night show.

I still have a nice black and white photo I took of the top five, in which you can see the tops of the judges' heads in the forefront. But I'm sure the 'anti-conspiracy' theorist will probably claim it's been doctored by the Warren Commission.

Anyway, in all fairness and gayness, I don't really care that the show is fixed any more than I care if the Miss Universe is fixed. Like most schmoes, I'm there to look at the ebony and ivory moutains of salacious muscle, not bankrupt the Orleans Sportsbook, which for some strange reason won't take bets on the Olympia.

Ok, so you're telling me that from the front row with enough room for people to pass between you and the judges seats...that you were able to "lean forward" enough to see what was being written on a paper, lying flat on the table....in front of the judges??  LOL....please.

As for the "judge in question"...was he actually judging, or test judging? Was he an alternate judge?  Assuming he was a new judge (since you dont seem to know who he was given your vast knowledge.....) perhaps he was scoring in the wrong box, was scoring the wrong round, etc.....you have no idea what was being changed. As the highs and lows are thrown out, this ONE judges score wouldnt have amounted to much anyway. If he was way off, his score would have been dropped....if he was within a place, his score wouldnt need to be "changed"...

You say your "pretty sure", but in reality, you're just inserting what you want to...you of all people shoud know that, counselor. Speculation at best...like the 5 eye witnesses at a accident scene, somehow all seeing and swearing to completely DIFFERENT accounts of the same thing.

Keep on with your story though....it's certainly more entertaining than the truth
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: OneManGang on September 04, 2009, 06:12:52 AM
Chick is no chicken, but an ostrich...with his head burried deep in the sand. Hear no evil see no evil... ::)
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Special Ed on September 04, 2009, 01:54:12 PM
LOL! In the event that anyone, anywhere had any question about Bob's indebtedness to the IFBB powerbrokers and his complete lack of interest in judging fairness or impartiality, you have all the proof you'll ever need right here, in black and beige.

But hey, the Eddie Murphy 'Wasn't Me' defense is just about all a guy can offer when he's caught red-handed. The prosecution rests.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: DK II on September 04, 2009, 01:56:31 PM
Chick is no chicken, but an ostrich...with his head burried deep in the sand. Hear no evil see no evil... ::)

no, he knows it all, he's just a liar. and not even a good one.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Blockhead on September 04, 2009, 02:53:48 PM
Bob you are definetely a wonderful "company man" i have to give u that.
Clearly, Chick has to fight what Ed is saying with all of his might because he also knows for a fact that all the 'IFBB Powerbrokers' are reading and studying this thread on an around the clock basis and his ass is on the line if he fails to deliver the 1st line of defense.



 - Block!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Big_Tymer on September 04, 2009, 03:56:43 PM
agreed.  chick is the 'damage control rep' that was assigned by the ifbb to defend the organization on getbig
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Vince B on September 04, 2009, 06:28:14 PM
If Jim Manion reads these threads it must be funny as hell to hear his calls to his stooge, Bob, telling him what to do.

Imagine having to be the Pro League apologist on Getbig! Now that takes a special guy for sure. You need someone who

is totally loyal and who has no integrity at all. How about a cadet deputy sheriff? Yeah, that is the perfect candidate. Give

the dude some token power and you have a disciple for life.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The Master on September 04, 2009, 06:32:08 PM
If Jim Manion reads these threads it must be funny as hell to hear his calls to his stooge, Bob, telling him what to do.

Imagine having to be the Pro League apologist on Getbig! Now that takes a special guy for sure. You need someone who

is totally loyal and who has no integrity at all. How about a cadet deputy sheriff? Yeah, that is the perfect candidate. Give

the dude some token power and you have a disciple for life.


You never answered the question about Tommy Emmanuel you forgetful old geezer.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 04, 2009, 06:36:34 PM
Ok, so you're telling me that from the front row with enough room for people to pass between you and the judges seats...that you were able to "lean forward" enough to see what was being written on a paper, lying flat on the table....in front of the judges??  LOL....please.

As for the "judge in question"...was he actually judging, or test judging? Was he an alternate judge?  Assuming he was a new judge (since you dont seem to know who he was given your vast knowledge.....) perhaps he was scoring in the wrong box, was scoring the wrong round, etc.....you have no idea what was being changed. As the highs and lows are thrown out, this ONE judges score wouldnt have amounted to much anyway. If he was way off, his score would have been dropped....if he was within a place, his score wouldnt need to be "changed"...

You say your "pretty sure", but in reality, you're just inserting what you want to...you of all people shoud know that, counselor. Speculation at best...like the 5 eye witnesses at a accident scene, somehow all seeing and swearing to completely DIFFERENT accounts of the same thing.

Keep on with your story though....it's certainly more entertaining than the truth

There's one major problem with what you've stated, Bob.  It's logical, they'll never buy it.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: Wiggs on September 04, 2009, 06:56:32 PM
This is vintage Getbig right here...I feel like the old days are back.  Thanks Ed!
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: wes on September 05, 2009, 03:32:10 AM
If Jim Manion reads these threads it must be funny as hell to hear his calls to his stooge, Bob, telling him what to do.

Imagine having to be the Pro League apologist on Getbig! Now that takes a special guy for sure. You need someone who

is totally loyal and who has no integrity at all. How about a cadet deputy sheriff? Yeah, that is the perfect candidate. Give

the dude some token power and you have a disciple for life.
Don`t you have a strangers funeral to crash or something?
Title: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Special Ed on September 06, 2009, 01:21:13 PM
According to Blockhead, he spoke with Chick at the Continental USA last night and asked Bob for his honest opinion about my Top Ten Olympia Predictions, to which Bob replied, "I know he's your friend but he's an idiot."

To which I make the following BOLD rebuttal proclamation: If an MD-endorsed bodybuilder (Kai Greene, Victor Martinez, or Dennis Wolf) win the Olympia this year without a prior agreement between AMI and MD to forgo exclusivity, then I will allow Bob to choose one of the following punishments:

a) Kai Greene can use my mouth or ass as a fruit prop for his next video;
b) Victor Martinez can use my New York office to stash ecstasy, gear, and meth for the next year;
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.

Deal or No Deal?

P.S. No homo!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: G o a t b o y on September 06, 2009, 01:24:05 PM
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.




That's not exacly a time-limited punishment.  If anything, Matt would be helping Dennis get the gas chambers fired up!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: tendonitis on September 06, 2009, 01:26:02 PM
being called an idiot by Bob Chick is a compliment

I can't imagine being a 40 year old man having to make my living by telling everyone the sky really isn't blue
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Schmoe Buster on September 06, 2009, 01:30:02 PM
Chick is the biggest idiot of all, his whole life is a "mirage"
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Chick on September 06, 2009, 01:33:23 PM
According to Blockhead, he spoke with Chick at the Continental USA last night and asked Bob for his honest opinion about my Top Ten Olympia Predictions, to which Bob replied, "I know he's your friend but he's an idiot."

To which I make the following BOLD rebuttal proclamation: If an MD-endorsed bodybuilder (Kai Greene, Victor Martinez, or Dennis Wolf) win the Olympia this year without a prior agreement between AMI and MD to forgo exclusivity, then I will allow Bob to choose one of the following punishments:

a) Kai Greene can use my mouth or ass as a fruit prop for his next video;
b) Victor Martinez can use my New York office to stash ecstasy, gear, and meth for the next year;
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.

Deal or No Deal?

P.S. No homo!


Just what is it you do in your "NY office"?


Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Special Ed on September 06, 2009, 01:47:21 PM

Just what is it you do in your "NY office"?
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: spinnis on September 06, 2009, 01:48:17 PM
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!

hahahahahahahahahah
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Milos_Sarcev on September 06, 2009, 01:49:23 PM
He could call you genius - which one you prefer? ;D
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Big_Tymer on September 06, 2009, 01:58:50 PM
Notice bob does not agree to the stipulation Special Ed offered.  He knows that its impossible for a MD endorsed bb to win.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Chick on September 06, 2009, 02:00:27 PM
Notice bob does not agree to the stipulation Special Ed offered.  He knows that its impossible for a MD endorsed bb to win.

Read his "stipulation" again...he covers himself both ways.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: TRIX on September 06, 2009, 02:06:50 PM
FUUCK ALL THE BODYBUILDERS

i will be a pro some day  :o :o :o


BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAH
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEH

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL LOL         LOLOLOLOL
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Bobby on September 06, 2009, 02:08:01 PM
many 'feelings' hurt

fight fight fight :D
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on September 06, 2009, 03:21:20 PM
oh geez bob ::)
do u ever think b4 u speak
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Army of One on September 06, 2009, 05:06:54 PM
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!

HAHAHA, owning of the year right there, poor Chick should go hang his head in shame for eternity after that one!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Tapeworm on September 06, 2009, 06:07:40 PM
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!

blackballed
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 06:12:33 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on September 06, 2009, 06:12:48 PM
HAHAHA, owning of the year right there, poor Chick should go hang his head in shame for eternity after that one!
haha yes!!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 06, 2009, 06:14:10 PM
;)
trophies were better back then it appears
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: TechnoViking on September 06, 2009, 06:17:12 PM

Just what is it you do in your "NY office"?




Chick

Was Blockhead covered in Protan?
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on September 06, 2009, 06:26:37 PM
According to Blockhead, he spoke with Chick at the Continental USA last night and asked Bob for his honest opinion about my Top Ten Olympia Predictions, to which Bob replied, "I know he's your friend but he's an idiot."

To which I make the following BOLD rebuttal proclamation: If an MD-endorsed bodybuilder (Kai Greene, Victor Martinez, or Dennis Wolf) win the Olympia this year without a prior agreement between AMI and MD to forgo exclusivity, then I will allow Bob to choose one of the following punishments:

a) Kai Greene can use my mouth or ass as a fruit prop for his next video;
b) Victor Martinez can use my New York office to stash ecstasy, gear, and meth for the next year;
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.

Deal or No Deal?

P.S. No homo!


Bob called you an idiot....well...its not like he was lying or something... ::)
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: mwbbuilder on September 06, 2009, 06:33:08 PM
HAHAHA, owning of the year right there, poor Chick should go hang his head in shame for eternity after that one!

That's doesn't count! Chick served up Special Ed a SOFTBALL! Anyone could that one out of the park! ;)
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 06:34:24 PM
trophies were better back then it appears
yes better than the cheap shit of today
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: aliamini on September 06, 2009, 09:14:43 PM
According to Blockhead, he spoke with Chick at the Continental USA last night and asked Bob for his honest opinion about my Top Ten Olympia Predictions, to which Bob replied, "I know he's your friend but he's an idiot."

To which I make the following BOLD rebuttal proclamation: If an MD-endorsed bodybuilder (Kai Greene, Victor Martinez, or Dennis Wolf) win the Olympia this year without a prior agreement between AMI and MD to forgo exclusivity, then I will allow Bob to choose one of the following punishments:

a) Kai Greene can use my mouth or ass as a fruit prop for his next video;
b) Victor Martinez can use my New York office to stash ecstasy, gear, and meth for the next year;
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.

Deal or No Deal?

P.S. No homo!

that has to be quote of the year
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 06, 2009, 09:25:56 PM
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!
LOL! thats awesome
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: StickStickly on September 06, 2009, 09:34:39 PM
According to Blockhead, he spoke with Chick at the Continental USA last night and asked Bob for his honest opinion about my Top Ten Olympia Predictions, to which Bob replied, "I know he's your friend but he's an idiot."

To which I make the following BOLD rebuttal proclamation: If an MD-endorsed bodybuilder (Kai Greene, Victor Martinez, or Dennis Wolf) win the Olympia this year without a prior agreement between AMI and MD to forgo exclusivity, then I will allow Bob to choose one of the following punishments:

a) Kai Greene can use my mouth or ass as a fruit prop for his next video;
b) Victor Martinez can use my New York office to stash ecstasy, gear, and meth for the next year;
c) Dennis Wolf can put on a Nazi uniform and keep me in a barbed wire enclosure in Germany until Matt C liberates me.

Deal or No Deal?

P.S. No homo!
;D now that was funny for once Ed.... especially the last one
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: io856 on September 06, 2009, 10:20:39 PM
lol @ your new avatar Special Ed
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Matt C on September 06, 2009, 10:23:07 PM

That's not exacly a time-limited punishment.  If anything, Matt would be helping Dennis get the gas chambers fired up!

If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: io856 on September 06, 2009, 10:25:13 PM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.
sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: chaos on September 06, 2009, 10:25:35 PM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.
Are you saying you found a use for a jew that didn't require starter fluid and a lighter?
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Matt C on September 06, 2009, 10:47:20 PM
sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft

Looks like thanks to Special Ed I got the elevator!!!

Are you saying you found a use for a jew that didn't require starter fluid and a lighter?

 ;D
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 07, 2009, 05:17:00 AM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.
you got legal advise for free....how COLORED of you
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: bodybuildermdpitt on September 07, 2009, 05:22:49 AM
Mostly read Captain America comics while posting on Getbig, waiting for the phone to ring for an audition to read for 'Meat Head #2'.

Just kidding. I love you man!

Wow... you have basically marginalzied Bob to a bitch with that statement. Biggest owning in a while.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Bobby on September 07, 2009, 09:16:05 AM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.

maybe jews aren't so bad after all :D
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: dr.chimps on September 07, 2009, 09:38:22 AM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.
Thunder Bay's baddest ass!?
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: tom joad on September 07, 2009, 10:44:16 AM
bob, give up trying to match wits with ed while you're way behind.  it's not your fault that you weren't born with a whole lot of brain cells rubbing against each other. 
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Earl1972 on September 07, 2009, 11:23:33 AM
If not for the legal advice Special Ed gave me, I would be sitting in federal prison for assaulting a police officer as well as three other charges.  Special Ed asked me questions via PM which the crown attorney would likely ask me during the trial and as a result I was very well prepared and was found not guilty.

woah what's the story with this?

E
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Colossus3 on September 07, 2009, 01:45:56 PM
Seen Chick at Illinois St.charles continental contest , all jokes a side he seems like a good guy.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 07, 2009, 01:48:51 PM
Seen Chick at Illinois St.charles continental contest , all jokes a side he seems like a good guy.
that's what people said about jeffrey Dahmer too
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: G o a t b o y on September 07, 2009, 02:21:28 PM
woah what's the story with this?

E


It wasn't Matt's fault.  The police officer in question was a negro.  Naturally, Matt assumed no way was this a real cop!
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Bobby on September 07, 2009, 03:19:37 PM

It wasn't Matt's fault.  The police officer in question was a negro.  Naturally, Matt assumed no way was this a real cop!

maybe the officer was confiscating matts car while in civilian clothes and matt just assumed...
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Chick on September 07, 2009, 04:53:53 PM
HAHAHA, owning of the year right there, poor Chick should go hang his head in shame for eternity after that one!

Yeah, real big owning there...except for the fact that I get PAID to model for Capt A, and post, and lift weights....
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Army of One on September 07, 2009, 04:58:10 PM
Yeah, real big owning there...except for the fact that I get PAID to model for Capt A, and post, and lift weights....

You got a brutal owning, deal with it.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: noworries on September 07, 2009, 04:58:28 PM
Seen Chick at Illinois St.charles continental contest , all jokes a side he seems like a good guy.

Actually Bob is a great guy.  I like him alot.  The thing I don't like is how he is being used by the IFBB to cover up their bullshit.  They use him so their names aren't used and they don't have to put up with questions and controversy.  The IFBB is crooked and everyone knows it.  Without Wayne, there is no one else who has the balls to put up with the public and the bullshit the IFBB brings upon themselves.  Every IFBB official and especially the top brass are all crooked.  Now they have Bob to absorb all the shit everyone throws at them.  I feel bad that Bob has been brainwashed and obviously put in a position where he either does what they say and be the scapegoat or some privileges will be lost.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: G o a t b o y on September 07, 2009, 05:00:48 PM
Yeah, real big owning there...except for the fact that I get PAID to model for Capt A, and post, and lift weights....



Bob brutally admits he gets paid to post.  Manion needs him here replying to the "peanut gallery" with the official IFBB party line. 


I always assumed, but it's nice to have confirmation.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Army of One on September 07, 2009, 05:02:57 PM


Bob brutally admits he get's paid to post.  Manion needs him here replying to the "peanut gallery" with the official IFBB party line. 


I always assumed, but it's nice to have confirmation.

Meltdowns always reveal the truth.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: G o a t b o y on September 07, 2009, 05:10:24 PM
As we speak Bob is placing a nervous phone call to the 412 area code...  "Uh, yeah, Jim?  I kinda made a little boo-boo while I was arguing with those Getbig losers..."



Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Chick on September 07, 2009, 05:12:56 PM


Bob brutally admits he gets paid to post.  Manion needs him here replying to the "peanut gallery" with the official IFBB party line. 


I always assumed, but it's nice to have confirmation.

LOl...nice try loser...but no one actually gets paid to post per se...(at least not here on Getbig).....As part of my BB.com contract however, it is ONE of my "duties"...so yes, I do get paid to post...just not on here.

Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Army of One on September 07, 2009, 05:17:51 PM
LOl...nice try loser...but no one actually gets paid to post per se...(at least not here on Getbig).....As part of my BB.com contract however, it is ONE of my "duties"...so yes, I do get paid to post...just not on here.



Its too late for lies now Bob, the truth is out.
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on September 07, 2009, 05:23:44 PM
Its too late for lies now Bob, the truth is out.
haha bob is caught
ed made the statement about captain america and posting on getbig to which bob replied about how he get paid to do both-ed never mention other site
whenever bob makes a mistake and posts something he should not have he always writes a certain way...notice his condescending tone is not present in the post and his use of lol
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: io856 on September 07, 2009, 05:32:07 PM
buying humalog OTC
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: TRIX on September 07, 2009, 08:20:12 PM
Can i have free supplements vince?
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 07, 2009, 09:14:37 PM
Bob owes so much to so many that he is permanently bent over. At least we can walk away from these boards whereas hapless stooge Chick is contracted to contribute to discussion forums. I would say he lost his soul a long time ago. Actually, about the same time he accepted the pro masters title gift.

I wonder, for you and those of your ilk, what the reaction would be if Bob stopped posting here.  For all of the energy spent bashing him, it begs the question of what you would possibly do with all of your free time if he were no longer here?  I think you'd miss him, Vince.  You'd be like Kramer at the end of the episode where the Kenny Roger's Roasters gets shut down.  "Bob,....Bob,...Bob!"
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: pumpster on September 08, 2009, 07:25:50 AM
And your free time is spent monitoring what I am doing? .


lol no life "Iderful" does nothing more than follow others around here then obsesses about about what others are up to. ;D
Title: Re: Bob Chick called me an Idiot!
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 08, 2009, 11:32:46 AM

lol no life "Iderful" does nothing more than follow others around here then obsesses about about what others are up to. ;D

And in turn you follow me around and obsess over what I am doing, like the lost puppy you are.  Now go away before I hit you with a rolled up newspaper. On a side note, you'll see that although I registered here over a year before you, you have almost 19,000 posts, while I don't even have 1,700.  What was that about having no life?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: Chick on September 29, 2009, 04:12:56 PM
1. Whomever Flex/AMI has decided should win this year (Phil Heath);  WRONG/ JAY
2. Whomever Muscletech has decided should be second this year (Dexter Jackson); WRONG/ BRANCH
3. Whomever Jim Manion likes the most and thinks should be 3rd (Jay Cutler); WRONG/ DEX
4. Whomever Steve Weinberger likes the most and thinks should be 4th (Victor Martinez);WRONG/ KAI
5. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should win but won't (Kai Greene);WRONG/ PHIL
6. Whomever Steve Blechman thinks should get second because he is so powerful but he's not (Dennis Wolf);WRONG/ VIC
7. Whomever Lee Thompson likes the most and thinks should be 5th, but Blechman sponsors more events (Branch Warren);WRONG/ RONNIE ROCKEL
8. Whomever John Lindsay likes the most and does the most West Coast favors for (Melvin Anthony);WRONG/ TONEY FREEMAN
9. Whomever placed 5th last year as they fade into obscurity and become a footnote (Toney Freeman);WRONG/ HIDE
10. Whomever the judges feel should place 5th, but due to politics will be placed 10th (Ronnie Coleman).WRONG/ MO EL MOSSAWOUI



Pretty good, Ed....0-10. your usual %
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: Earl1972 on September 29, 2009, 04:40:40 PM
hahaha Ed got owned ;D

E
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: kiwiol on September 29, 2009, 04:44:41 PM
hahaha Ed got owned ;D

E

Yes. The judging was fair and obvious for everyone to see.
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 29, 2009, 07:42:49 PM
Pretty good, Ed....0-10. your usual %

Does that, along with the moniker "Special Ed" denote that he takes the short bus?
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten Olympia Picks (No BS!)
Post by: The Luke on September 29, 2009, 08:54:57 PM
Just a quick note about Bob's argument...

As for the "judge in question"...was he actually judging, or test judging? Was he an alternate judge?  Assuming he was a new judge (since you dont seem to know who he was given your vast knowledge.....) perhaps he was scoring in the wrong box, was scoring the wrong round, etc.....you have no idea what was being changed. As the highs and lows are thrown out, this ONE judges score wouldnt have amounted to much anyway. If he was way off, his score would have been dropped....if he was within a place, his score wouldnt need to be "changed"...

...while his might seem pretty plausible, as someone who is interested in system manipulation from a gaming perspective, I'd like to correct it.

If Bev and Steve really were editing a fellow judges scoresheet then manipulation of the final result is NOT out of the question.

Let me give you a hypothetical example, which might better elucidate some of the seemingly counter-intuitive strategies that actually can pay dividends under these circumstances; imagine four bodybuilders named A, B, C and D who should fairly be judged 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respectively.

If two judges want to change the results and have bodybuilder B win, then they have several options available to them by interfering with a third judges score:

-they could create a consensus of three identical scoresheets; if three judges rank bodybuilder B in 1st place then the dismissal of the highest and lowest scores in each round has NO EFFECT. Even if they are the ONLY judges who rank bodybuilder B in 1st and one of their scores are discarded, then they still succeed in having two unfair scores counted. If all the other scorecards are fair, then no matter how many other judges there are they still change the result: bodybuilder B in 1st.

-they could use the interfered with score card to rank bodybuilder A in 5th place instead of first, thereby guaranteeing that this score is excluded and skewing the averages for the other competitors. The real lowest score (which should fairly be discarded) is then included putting bodybuilder A at a disadvantage.

-they could each place a DIFFERENT top three finisher well OUT of the top three, thereby slightly reducing the average of all top three finishers (except for their favorite).

There are lots of strategies, but you get the idea...


This kind of thing is not impossible given the current judging system... remember, in an averaged ranking, you can sometimes better rig the vote by awarding your favorite consistent 2nd places, while attributing 1sts and 3rds to his competitors.


But why am I discussing these subtle intricacies? Everyone knows bodybuiding shows are rigged by fixing the callouts... it's very easy to determine places by avoiding certain callouts. Until every competing bodybuilder is compared with every other competing bodybuilder in combinations of two; three or four with a live scoreboard at prejudging (and hopefully simultaneous audience voting) we won't have honest contests.

In fact, if you were careful to avoid direct comparisons, I'm pretty sure you could lock a guy who should be second (or maybe even first) in eighth place because he used to do a bit of porn.


The Luke
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: TechnoViking on September 29, 2009, 09:06:46 PM
Pretty good, Ed....0-10. your usual %

Well at least he still has his radio show to fall back on
Title: Re: Olympia: Special Ed's Top Ten + Ed vs. Chick Battle
Post by: OneManGang on September 30, 2009, 07:18:11 AM
Well at least he still has his radio show to fall back on

Bob Chick has his double chin to fall back on. Perhaps is old trusted threadmill has collapsed under his weight and he is now unable to do cardio