Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: littleguns on March 25, 2010, 06:28:33 AM

Title: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: littleguns on March 25, 2010, 06:28:33 AM
Don't know if anyone has ever/will ever match his graineyness, last person I remember was Jim Quinn back in the day

Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: BayGBM on March 25, 2010, 06:41:26 AM
He's "freaky" and I like freaks as much as the next guy, but I think Branch peaked a while ago.  His lines are nowhere near as good as they used to be.  See the pix in this thread http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=150704.0

Grainyness only goes so far.  At 5'6" you can only add so much muscle before you've maxed out your physique; I think Branch has done that.  His waist has also gotten a lot bigger over the years and that doesn't look.   :-\

He's got 'the wow factor' in spades, but I wouldn't give his physique any more trophies.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Figo on March 25, 2010, 07:00:51 AM
a lot of muscle tears

sure the size game has taken a toll, still a freak nonetheless. Good drawcard factor
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Mr Nobody on March 25, 2010, 07:08:46 AM
He wont be around at 40, in the ground.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: tendonitis on March 25, 2010, 07:15:14 AM
trainwreck
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Figo on March 25, 2010, 07:28:43 AM
He wont be around at 40, in the ground.

he looks almost 50
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 07:51:27 AM
im a steroid user and all so im not hating, but HONESTLY....you gotta wonder what his blood pressure must be.  i would be willing to bet that if you put a sensitive enough microphone next to his lower back you might actually be able to hear his kidneys weeping.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Mr Nobody on March 25, 2010, 07:53:04 AM
im a steroid user and all so im not hating, but HONESTLY....you gotta wonder what his blood pressure must be.  i would be willing to bet that if you put a sensitive enough microphone next to his lower back you might actually be able to hear his kidneys weeping.
Yep dont think he last long a good dude though.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: JasonH on March 25, 2010, 07:56:22 AM
I like the "grainy" look as much as the next guy, but his physique is just becoming ugly - it just looks like a mass of bodyparts all thrown together. The quad size and shape is excellent but he doesn't really have anything else that I would want if I could have that sort of physique. Steroids are wrecking him.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 07:59:41 AM
Yep dont think he last long a good dude though.

never know though, maybe with his resources, he knows the right doctors to put him on the right kind of statins and BP meds.  even though he takes probably alot more, he might just be safer then the average user

doubt it though
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Figo on March 25, 2010, 08:00:33 AM
I like the "grainy" look as much as the next guy, but his physique is just becoming ugly - it just looks like a mass of bodyparts all thrown together. The quad size and shape is excellent but he doesn't really have anything else that I would want if I could have that sort of physique. Steroids are wrecking him.

and other compounds, Im sure. Many other agents
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: BayGBM on March 25, 2010, 08:04:51 AM
I like the "grainy" look as much as the next guy, but his physique is just becoming ugly - it just looks like a mass of bodyparts all thrown together. The quad size and shape is excellent but he doesn't really have anything else that I would want if I could have that sort of physique. Steroids are wrecking him.


x2!  Steroids made him and they can break him!

But seriously, the guy is 5'6".  If he were not on steroids would anyone in the world even notice him at 130lbs?  ???
He's done a lot with a little, but he's taken it too far.  :-\
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 08:11:48 AM

x2!  Steroids made him and they can break him!

But seriously, the guy is 5'6".  If he were not on steroids would anyone in the world even notice him at 130lbs?  ???
He's done a lot with a little, but he's taken it too far.  :-\

#1 it not the steroids that are wrecking him (physique wise) its the peptides

#2 what weird is he totally changed his structure over the years, if you look at his pics when he was competing as a young man....he was actually pretty aesthetic and proportioned

(http://img.youtube.com/vi/0GBoKMbWjlI/0.jpg)
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: littleguns on March 25, 2010, 12:34:35 PM
He's paid his dues and seems to have found the right formula for conditioning.........
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Rami on March 25, 2010, 12:50:20 PM
He does not look like the same guy. How is that possible?
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: MadeYaMelt on March 25, 2010, 01:02:21 PM
Bay is right.  These short guys just don't get it.  You can only put so much mass on your frame before you look like a complete ball of shit.  Why don't they just lower the dosage, bring their waists in, and compete in 202?  In time, the 202 division will be modestly lucrative in its own right. 
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: BayGBM on March 25, 2010, 01:04:51 PM
He does not look like the same guy. How is that possible?

My point exactly!  http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=150704.0

Yet there were people in that thread who said he looks better now.  ??? :-\ :-[
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 01:48:35 PM
Bay is right.  These short guys just don't get it.  You can only put so much mass on your frame before you look like a complete ball of shit.  Why don't they just lower the dosage, bring their waists in, and compete in 202?  In time, the 202 division will be modestly lucrative in its own right. 

the open is barley lucrative, save for 2 shows a year.  all the other shows pay around 10 grand, which isnt far from what it takes to prepare for one of these shows

the 202 division, there is noooooooooo money there
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: kyomu on March 25, 2010, 01:53:07 PM
Paco and Dorian
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 02:00:47 PM
Paco and Dorian

gaspari, munzer, pavol joblinicky


white guys tend to get granier for some reason.....when ever you mention the thinnest-sandpaper skinned grainy bodybuilders, its almost all white guys

just like when you mention the best structured guys its black guys


i think black guy tend to carry l little more water then white guys,
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: kyomu on March 25, 2010, 02:28:57 PM
gaspari, munzer, pavol joblinicky


white guys tend to get granier for some reason.....when ever you mention the thinnest-sandpaper skinned grainy bodybuilders, its almost all white guys

just like when you mention the best structured guys its black guys


i think black guy tend to carry l little more water then white guys,
Gaspari is grany as you say.
Pavol...so.so.

Munzer is super shredded but he is not grany.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: XXXII/LX on March 25, 2010, 02:33:31 PM
Gaspari is grany as you say.
Pavol...so.so.

Munzer is super shredded but he is not grany.
[/quote

Are you high?
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Hulkotron on March 25, 2010, 02:37:13 PM
Haha I love the tragic injuries incurred in bodybuilding.

"Fell down a flight of stairs outside the gym."
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: kyomu on March 25, 2010, 02:39:38 PM
Gaspari is grany as you say.
Pavol...so.so.

Munzer is super shredded but he is not grany.
[/quote

Are you high?
Serious.
 Have you ever seen his off season mode?
He looked soft. Just he knew how to dial in.

On the other hand, Dorian looked hard even with fat.
Paco also.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: KevinP85 on March 25, 2010, 02:49:25 PM
The theory of short guys and muscle mass??

Well, look at Kai, he is 5'7 or so and outmasses Phil, yet Phil is 5'9 is already maxing out his physique as it seems.

Nasser is 5'11 and IMO he looks much better before adding all that mass to his frame, he was looking like shit in his later years. Flex Wheeler is the same way. So the arguement of height in some ways can be throwned out of the equation. Bone structure/joints have more to do with it.

The only guys that come to my mind right now that can add mass and still look good whether height is concerned is Chris Cormier, Dillet, Freeman, Ronnie of course, etc..
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 03:31:25 PM
Gaspari is grany as you say.
Pavol...so.so.

Munzer is super shredded but he is not grany.

really, like the other guys said.......are you high???  he single handedly redefined "grainy"

Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on March 25, 2010, 03:47:10 PM
Munzer was only 31 years old there. At 35 he would have been much more grainy looking (fuck that sounds gay).
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 03:59:46 PM
Munzer was only 31 years old there. At 35 he would have been much more grainy looking (fuck that sounds gay).

lol, a discriminating eye can pic out the finer points of oiled-up, shimmering-thonged musclemen ;) ;)
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 04:04:18 PM
look at those tie-ins....just incredible....

(http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=29892&d=1079797991)

(http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=29901&d=1079798862)
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: BayGBM on March 26, 2010, 10:23:43 AM
Munzer was only 31 years old there. At 35 he would have been much more grainy looking (fuck that sounds gay).

;D
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: BayGBM on March 26, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
I can't believe how far he has fallen from his peak.  :-[

He is starting to "look like a bag of smashed assholes."  Btw, which getbigger invented that phrase?
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Parker on March 26, 2010, 10:36:33 AM
really, like the other guys said.......are you high???  he single handedly redefined "grainy"


I don't see super grainy, I see super shreddedness. Grainy to me, is the consistency of the muscle, to have a granite like quality to it, a certain solidity and denseness that comes from yrs of hard work, versus young "inflated" muscle.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Earl1972 on March 26, 2010, 03:28:43 PM
I can't believe how far he has fallen from his peak.  :-[

He is starting to "look like a bag of smashed assholes."  Btw, which getbigger invented that phrase?

not invented on getbig

E
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: wes on March 27, 2010, 01:27:24 AM
Branch has looked like crap for a few years now.
Has a serious chemical look to him,as if he was gonna` explode anytime soon.

Ruined a nice physique.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: haider on March 28, 2010, 09:47:52 AM
I can't believe how far he has fallen from his peak.  :-[

He is starting to "look like a bag of smashed assholes."  Btw, which getbigger invented that phrase?
his upperbody is at least. strange.
Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: disco_stu on March 28, 2010, 01:25:26 PM
another idiot waving his arms around arbitrarily only to arrive after a stagnant pause at one of the "same old" poses.

what was with the pirouette before his first pose?

seriously, this shit is embarrassing.


Title: Re: Branch Warren Arnold 2010
Post by: Matt C on March 28, 2010, 08:52:40 PM
I can't believe how far he has fallen from his peak.  :-[

He is starting to "look like a bag of smashed assholes."  Btw, which getbigger invented that phrase?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=325414.0;attach=364713;image)

I read that expression on elitefitness in 2002.