Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Deicide on September 19, 2011, 12:28:55 PM
-
???
-
May have , although 09 might be better
-
May have , although 09 might be better
Could 2001 Cutler have beaten 2011 Heath?
-
;D
-
Could 2001 Cutler have beaten 2011 Heath?
Nope
-
Could 2001 Cutler have beaten 2011 Heath?
Yes
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=395703.0;attach=429969;image)
the lasix DQ'ed him right out the show but ronnie was still the better bber. born the same yr, jay would have never seen an O with ronnie round. phil is a lucky bitch too.
evan ::)
kai and wiggs ::)
kulco ::) (can't get rid of the donut glaze)
wolfe ::)
victor ::)
-
2001 by miles
-
2001 was his best year.
-
2001 is his best physique
2009 is his best performance
It's like compare 1999 Ronnie Coleman with 2003 Ronnie Coleman
-
They both got gyno....it's not that hard to have it cut out, why didn't they....?
-
2009 was jays best year,bigger than 01 and just as cut if not more so.
-
Jay looked WAY better at the 2003 ASC IMO
that's his best
-
2001 and 2003 best years for him.
-
his legs looked better when he was lighter and every pose including most muscular 01 looks great compared to now he's heavier but his crab most muscular is not a good pose now weird.
-
2009....much bigger, not quite as sharp in some poses though. Guy never had a great detailed back....wide as shit though...its the width that finally toppled Coleman in '06..a much hobbled Coleman though, but still.
-
Cutler looks great in those pics. It's refreshing to see some quality pics of him posted