Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: AlphaMaleDawg on November 02, 2011, 11:31:47 AM

Title: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on November 02, 2011, 11:31:47 AM
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/fat-free-mass-index-in-users-and-nonusers-of-anabolic-androgen-steroids-research-review.html
Title: Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
Post by: purenaturalstrength on November 02, 2011, 11:43:46 AM
lyle mcdonald is very accurate and no bullshit

people mock him because he's small and weak

they want to be fed lies by lying hormonized fools who are big and strong (because of the hormones)
Title: Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
Post by: berblexer on November 02, 2011, 11:45:34 AM
Quote from: AlphaMaleDawg on November 02, 2011, 11:31:47 AM
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

haha 1.8 is actually 5'11, who's unable to convert eh?
Title: Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
Post by: Dr Dutch on November 02, 2011, 12:08:20 PM
Quote from: AlphaMaleDawg on November 02, 2011, 11:31:47 AM
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/fat-free-mass-index-in-users-and-nonusers-of-anabolic-androgen-steroids-research-review.html
The article gives a higher muscular weight for naturals than gh15 said..
Title: Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on November 02, 2011, 12:11:10 PM
Quote from: berblexer on November 02, 2011, 11:45:34 AM
haha 1.8 is actually 5'11, who's unable to convert eh?

blame it on my google search