Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on January 20, 2012, 12:46:13 PM
-
Breaking: Judge Mahili Denies Obama's Motion To Squash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-PowellvObama,OrderonMotiontoQuashSubpoenas,GeorgiaBallotChallenge.pdf ^
January 20, 2012 2:59:37 PM by Obama Exposer
Judge Mahili Denies Obama's Motion To Squash Subpoenas And To Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing!!!
The Order:
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to squash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at art2superpac.com ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78876832/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Order-on-Motion-to-Quash-Subpoenas-Georgia-Ballot-Challenge
Awesome - ghettothugbama has to appear.
-
From ORYR:
"Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing
Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012."
-end snip-
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-malihi-denies-obamas.html
-
:D
-
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78876832/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Order-on-Motion-to-Quash-Subpoenas-Georgia-Ballot-Challenge
Awesome - ghettothugbama has to appear.
No he doesnt...
Once he uses Executive Privilege, that will be the end of that...along with the case being thrown out like the rest..... Federal law overrules any state law...moron. ::)
-
No he doesnt...
Once he uses Executive Privilege, that will be the end of that...along with the case being thrown out like the rest..... Federal law overrules any state law...moron. ::)
Why can't Obama just release his records?
-
Why can't Obama just release his records?
He's already released his birth certificate showing that he was born in the United States which honestly wasn't even required to begin with. All other items....school records, etc, is pretty ridiculous as they are not in the requirements to run or be President of the United States. There is really no basis or reason to ask for information that is not relevant.
Point being..this is an example of why Executive Privilege was written into the Constitution for. The POTUS can't run around the country to answer every bumfuck lawsuit and a state judge does not have the authority to subpeona the POTUS or has any jurisdiction outside the state. The only legit challenge that could have been made would have had to have been from Hawaii....and that's already been squashed
-
I'm still a birther, a bagger , a birtcher, and think Obama is hiding stuff.
-
Free Republic
Browse · Search Pings · Mail News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing (AP/ABC)
AP via ABC News ^ | AP
Posted on January 20, 2012 6:52:35 PM EST by SteveH
A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn't a natural-born citizen and can't be president.
It's one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama's name off the state's ballot in the March presidential primary.
An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
-
A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn't a natural-born citizen and can't be president.
It's one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama's name off the state's
ballot in the March presidential primary.
An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.
The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president's lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.
Copyright 2012 by Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
Awesome! CBS and AP running w this now.
go back to Kenya!
-
Georgia Democratic Party Responds To Obama Ballot Challenge Seeking Donations (Video)
^
Posted on January 21, 2012 2:42:36 PM EST by Obama Exposer
In a desperate plea attempt, the Georgia Democratic Party Chairman Mike Berlon has made a video requesting contributions to counter the Georgia access ballot challenge to President Obama. In the video he deems the lawsuit frivolous and demands the voters 'Force' republicans to debate the issues that affects Georgia's economic problems all while ignoring the Constitutional natural born citizen eligibility problem that faces Barack Obama.
-
He's already released his birth certificate showing that he was born in the United States which honestly wasn't even required to begin with. All other items....school records, etc, is pretty ridiculous as they are not in the requirements to run or be President of the United States. There is really no basis or reason to ask for information that is not relevant.
Point being..this is an example of why Executive Privilege was written into the Constitution for. The POTUS can't run around the country to answer every bumfuck lawsuit and a state judge does not have the authority to subpeona the POTUS or has any jurisdiction outside the state. The only legit challenge that could have been made would have had to have been from Hawaii....and that's already been squashed
Uh, we've already established the judge can issue the subpoena.
He's already done it, and it's been upheld.
Like I said, you = dumb.
That's not to say that others, including Obama, have to obey.
You are right about this needing to go away though. It makes the Republicans look like idiots and the longer it goes on, the worse they look.
-
http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/blog/barrack-obama-eligibility/a-question-from-lucas-smith-to-attorney-mario-apuzzo-if-obama-fails-to-appear-for-the-administrative-court-hearing-in-georgia-tentatively-scheduled-for-january-26-2012-what-legal-repercussions-co/ (http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/blog/barrack-obama-eligibility/a-question-from-lucas-smith-to-attorney-mario-apuzzo-if-obama-fails-to-appear-for-the-administrative-court-hearing-in-georgia-tentatively-scheduled-for-january-26-2012-what-legal-repercussions-co/)
A question from Lucas Smith to attorney Mario Apuzzo: If Obama fails to appear for the administrative court hearing in Georgia, tentatively scheduled for January, 26 2012, what legal repercussions could he be confronted with?...
...Lucas,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address this issue on your very informative blog. Here is a quick answer.
The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.
Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.
Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena and here is why.
“It is beyond dispute that there is in fact, a public obligation to provide evidence, see United States v. Bryan, 339 U. S. 323, 339 U. S. 331; Blackmer v. United States, 284 U. S. 421, 284 U. S. 438, and that this obligation persists no matter how financially burdensome it may be. Footnote 10″
“Footnote 10 t may be a sacrifice of time and labor, and thus of ease, of profits, of livelihood. This contribution is not to be regarded as a gratuity, or a courtesy, or an ill-required favor. It is a duty not to be grudged or evaded. Whoever is impelled to evade or to resent it should retire from the society of organized and civilized communities, and become a hermit. He who will live by society must let society live by him, when it requires to. 8 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2192, p. 72 (J. McNaughton rev.1961).”
Hurtado v. United States, 410 U.S. 578, 589 (1973). This is one case among the many on this issue.
Indeed, Obama, as a member of legally constitutued society, as a “public obligation” to provide evidence to a court, whether that court is a law court or an administrative one. His obligation is even greater given that the subpoena touches upon his right to eventually hold a public office should he win the election. Even Congress, which is not a law court, issues subpoenas which must be obeyed at the risk of suffering severe sanctions, including incarceration.
The only way that Obama could avoid the subpoena is to show that he has some privilege that protects him from giving the requested evidence. Again, Obama has been subpoened as a private person, a candidate for public office, not as the President of the United States. From the Georgia court’s ruling on Obama’s motion to quash, we can see that Obama failed to make such a showing that convinced the court that he in fact has such a privilege.
If Obama does not honor the subpoena, the court, applying Georgia law and precedents from federal law, can issue an order to show cause to him ordering him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. If he still does not comply, then he would be held in contempt of court. The court in such a case will issue sanctions to him, which can include a monetary penalty, an adverse ruling against him in the case itself, or even incarceration. Since he is the currently putative sitting President, the court would probably just opt for an adverse ruling rather than jail. That would be the best option since it gets to the heart of the matter. That adverse ruling would be that Obama has not met his burden of proof to show that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Hence, the court could recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s not be allowed to be placed on the primary ballot. In the end, the Secretary of State will make the ultimate decision.
Additionally, the current sitting President of the United States not honoring a court-issued and properly served subpoena related to whether the President is constitutionally eligible for that very office could also be deemed a “high Crime[] or Misdemeanor[]” under Article II, Section 4, the article dealing with impeachment of the President. Congress could declare such conduct a high crime or misdemeanor and inititate and prosecute impeachment proceedings against Obama and they should.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
htt://puzo1.blogspot.com
-
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/ART2SUPERPACANNOUNCEMENTREGARDINGLIVEGAHEARINGBROADCAST.pdf (http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/ART2SUPERPACANNOUNCEMENTREGARDINGLIVEGAHEARINGBROADCAST.pdf)
PRESS RELEASE – JANUARY 21st, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: ARTICLE II SUPER PAC TO BROADCAST JANUARY
26TH, 2012 OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARINGS IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA – LIVE!
Article II Political Action Committee (http://art2superpac.com) will be on site with uncut,
uncensored, complete, live streamed gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the first ever
“Obama” Constitutional Presidential eligibility hearings. “The PAC saw the need to do
this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by
MainStream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said Director
Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.
The PAC describes this upcoming event as “The hearing of the century, for the (alleged)
political crime of the century,” referring to the breathtaking implications of an illegal
“President” in the White House or on the presidential ballot.
For live video coverage from the hearings, go to http://www.Art2SuperPAC.com.
These proceedings could lead to the removal of the incumbent from the Georgia ballot,
which would raise questions nationwide. This would be the first time that these issues
and related evidence are deliberated in open court. Numerous ballot challenges have
been filed in dozens of states, contesting “Obama’s” questionable eligibility, based upon
natural born citizenship requirements, in Article II of the U.S. Constitution and laws in
multiple states. Georgia will be one of the first states heard. This is due to the timing of
challenge filings and its unique state administrative court set up to handle such matters,
in a jurisdiction potentially receptive to such cases.
Three cases are being heard on one momentous day, in this order: Plaintiffs David
Weldon (represented by Van Irion); Carl Swennson and Kevin Powell (represented by
Mark Hatfield); David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas McCLaren, Laurie Roth
(represented by Dr. Orly Taitz).
-
http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/blog/barrack-obama-eligibility/a-question-from-lucas-smith-to-attorney-mario-apuzzo-if-obama-fails-to-appear-for-the-administrative-court-hearing-in-georgia-tentatively-scheduled-for-january-26-2012-what-legal-repercussions-co/ (http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/blog/barrack-obama-eligibility/a-question-from-lucas-smith-to-attorney-mario-apuzzo-if-obama-fails-to-appear-for-the-administrative-court-hearing-in-georgia-tentatively-scheduled-for-january-26-2012-what-legal-repercussions-co/)
A question from Lucas Smith to attorney Mario Apuzzo: If Obama fails to appear for the administrative court hearing in Georgia, tentatively scheduled for January, 26 2012, what legal repercussions could he be confronted with?...
...Lucas,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address this issue on your very informative blog. Here is a quick answer.
The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.
Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.
Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena and here is why.
“It is beyond dispute that there is in fact, a public obligation to provide evidence, see United States v. Bryan, 339 U. S. 323, 339 U. S. 331; Blackmer v. United States, 284 U. S. 421, 284 U. S. 438, and that this obligation persists no matter how financially burdensome it may be. Footnote 10″
“Footnote 10 t may be a sacrifice of time and labor, and thus of ease, of profits, of livelihood. This contribution is not to be regarded as a gratuity, or a courtesy, or an ill-required favor. It is a duty not to be grudged or evaded. Whoever is impelled to evade or to resent it should retire from the society of organized and civilized communities, and become a hermit. He who will live by society must let society live by him, when it requires to. 8 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2192, p. 72 (J. McNaughton rev.1961).”
Hurtado v. United States, 410 U.S. 578, 589 (1973). This is one case among the many on this issue.
Indeed, Obama, as a member of legally constitutued society, as a “public obligation” to provide evidence to a court, whether that court is a law court or an administrative one. His obligation is even greater given that the subpoena touches upon his right to eventually hold a public office should he win the election. Even Congress, which is not a law court, issues subpoenas which must be obeyed at the risk of suffering severe sanctions, including incarceration.
The only way that Obama could avoid the subpoena is to show that he has some privilege that protects him from giving the requested evidence. Again, Obama has been subpoened as a private person, a candidate for public office, not as the President of the United States. From the Georgia court’s ruling on Obama’s motion to quash, we can see that Obama failed to make such a showing that convinced the court that he in fact has such a privilege.
If Obama does not honor the subpoena, the court, applying Georgia law and precedents from federal law, can issue an order to show cause to him ordering him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. If he still does not comply, then he would be held in contempt of court. The court in such a case will issue sanctions to him, which can include a monetary penalty, an adverse ruling against him in the case itself, or even incarceration. Since he is the currently putative sitting President, the court would probably just opt for an adverse ruling rather than jail. That would be the best option since it gets to the heart of the matter. That adverse ruling would be that Obama has not met his burden of proof to show that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Hence, the court could recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s not be allowed to be placed on the primary ballot. In the end, the Secretary of State will make the ultimate decision.
Additionally, the current sitting President of the United States not honoring a court-issued and properly served subpoena related to whether the President is constitutionally eligible for that very office could also be deemed a “high Crime[] or Misdemeanor[]” under Article II, Section 4, the article dealing with impeachment of the President. Congress could declare such conduct a high crime or misdemeanor and inititate and prosecute impeachment proceedings against Obama and they should.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
htt://puzo1.blogspot.com
That's the problem.... the judge is ignoring the fact that Obama IS the President of the United States. He's not a private citizen or a candidate anymore
Of course, to be honest, these types of lawsuits are no more ridiculous that the ones that tried to make brand Bush as a war criminal. The it really does not matter because Obama is not going to win the state of Georgia in the election anyway as he didn't win the state in 2008 but stuff like this will be used as a rallying cry and will give reason for people to mobilize. If the GOP wants to win, they have to beat Obama fair and square...if they are seen to be finding loopholes, then it will be detrimental
-
Vince - why can't Obama just release his damn records and end this?
-
Vince - why can't Obama just release his damn records and end this?
You know good and well that no matter what records he releases, it will never be enough to satisfy birther idiots like you.
-
plus yo'd have idiots crying about obama's 11th grade term papers.
i mean, if htey bitch about what michelle may have said, or what the christmas decorations were, or michelle's 'china red' dress...
-
You know good and well that no matter what records he releases, it will never be enough to satisfy birther idiots like you.
Want to see everything. Sorry, between his name changes, his alias, his I'd fraud, his ss fraud, he needs to come clean.
-
plus yo'd have idiots crying about obama's 11th grade term papers.
i mean, if htey bitch about what michelle may have said, or what the christmas decorations were, or michelle's 'china red' dress...
Thought you were a birther yourself? at least I admit I am a birther.
-
Thought you were a birther yourself? at least I admit I am a birther.
of course i'm a birther. and IMO, every candidate should be transparent. but since ya didn't care about mccain's 1 page doctors note... lol
but in this case, rush and levin would cry about his high school math test scores, you know this.
-
President Obama To Ignore Georgia Subpoena And Head To Las Vegas Jan 26th.
Posted on January 22, 2012 11:28:39 PM EST by Obama Exposer
President Obama plans to head out on a 3 day trip arriving in Las Vegas Wednesday afternoon and staying overnight well into Thursday. That afternoon he will leave for Denver and then Detroit. The president plans to promote his State of the Union address. With this action, President Obama intends to ignore a legal judicial subpoena from the state of Georgia requesting him, by name, to appear in court January 26th 2012 at 9am in Judge Michael Malihi's courtroom. Barack Obama's attempt as a candidate to be on the state ballot in Georgia has been officially legally challenged by state citizens in a official administrative hearing before a judge who was appointed by Governor Zell Miller, a democrat at the time.
It is important to know that, once you are given a subpoena or summons, you are legally required to attend the proceeding indicated on the document and serve as a witness for the case in question. Failure to comply with the court’s order can lead to severe penalties, including a warrant being issued for your arrest. In some states, you may even be fined, lose your driver’s license, or spend time in jail if do not appear at the proceeding indicated in the subpoena. As of now it appears Barack Obama will ignore the subpoena, upheld by Judge Malihi in his denial of the Presidents 'Motion to Quash', and carry on with his trip to 'Sin City' and beyond. It's also apparent that Barack Obama doesn't intend to show up in court and ensure the American people that he is indeed a natural born Citizen to be president as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
-
President Obama To Ignore Georgia Subpoena And Head To Las Vegas Jan 26th.
Posted on January 22, 2012 11:28:39 PM EST by Obama Exposer
President Obama plans to head out on a 3 day trip arriving in Las Vegas Wednesday afternoon and staying overnight well into Thursday. That afternoon he will leave for Denver and then Detroit. The president plans to promote his State of the Union address. With this action, President Obama intends to ignore a legal judicial subpoena from the state of Georgia requesting him, by name, to appear in court January 26th 2012 at 9am in Judge Michael Malihi's courtroom. Barack Obama's attempt as a candidate to be on the state ballot in Georgia has been officially legally challenged by state citizens in a official administrative hearing before a judge who was appointed by Governor Zell Miller, a democrat at the time.
It is important to know that, once you are given a subpoena or summons, you are legally required to attend the proceeding indicated on the document and serve as a witness for the case in question. Failure to comply with the court’s order can lead to severe penalties, including a warrant being issued for your arrest. In some states, you may even be fined, lose your driver’s license, or spend time in jail if do not appear at the proceeding indicated in the subpoena. As of now it appears Barack Obama will ignore the subpoena, upheld by Judge Malihi in his denial of the Presidents 'Motion to Quash', and carry on with his trip to 'Sin City' and beyond. It's also apparent that Barack Obama doesn't intend to show up in court and ensure the American people that he is indeed a natural born Citizen to be president as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
Bahahahahaha!!!! Like I said before, Obama isn't going to pay any attention to some judge because he doesn't have the power to make the President of the United States to appear in court.
The fact that the person who wrote this garbage is the biggest moron of all. In addition to Executive Privilege, the President of the United States has Sovereign Immunity which prevents him from being arrested by any judicial system, in addition he doesn't have a Georgia Driver's License because he's a resident of Illinois.
Of course the judge can issue a warrant but again....won't go anywhere and will likely make him a pretty big laughingstock. I am amazed at how far this has gone but its really a waste of taxpayer money.
-
Judge's order in ‘birther' case unlikely to draw Obama
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 5:49 p.m. Monday, January 23, 2012 | Bill Rankin
[...]
Obama will embark on a three-day trip following his State of the Union address Tuesday evening, White House press secretary Jay Carney said during a press briefing Monday. The White House has said that Obama will be in Las Vegas, Denver and Detroit this Thursday.
In a surprising ruling Friday, a Georgia state administrative judge declined to quash a subpoena directing Obama to attend a hearing Thursday at the Fulton County courthouse on a challenge to strike him from the Georgia ballot this fall on claims he is not a U.S. citizen.
Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi issued the decision after previously declining to dismiss the case, one of dozens around the country brought by so-called “birthers.” Malihi, appointed in 1995 by Gov. Zell Miller, presides at the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, which hears complaints against state agencies.
Last year, eight people filed challenges to Obama’s citizenship with the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, which administers elections. The agency referred the dispute to the administrative hearing office as required by law, an office spokesman said Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Jan 23, 2012
Fox News: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility Hearing - 1/23/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.com
-
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Jan 23, 2012
Fox News: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility Hearing - 1/23/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.com
Unfortunately, what Orly is not telling these people who she convinced to file charges is that when they are dismissed, they will have to pay court cost and attorney fees. That's what happenned in Alabama to Harold Sorensen and many others. Lt Col Terry Lakin had to serve 6 months in prison and was dismissed from the Army (Same as a dishonorable discharge to Military Officers).
However Orly doesn't have to pay shit because she's the lawyer and gets these stooges to file suit. Once they lose...off that bitch disappears to find more gullible idiots.
That's why this shit needs to stop....its ridiculous and its hurting a lot of people
-
This issue needs to die, die, die.
-
Amazingly enough, it was published here what happenned to Harold Sorensen
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/alabama-judge-orders-military-veteran.html
-
An attorney for a Georgia voter questioning President Barack Obama's eligibility for the March 6 primary said the president probably won't attend a hearing on the issue Thursday, even though a subpoena compelling his appearance stands.
Van R. Irion, who represents plaintiff David Welden, acknowledged Monday that Obama likely will avoid the trial-like proceeding before Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings Deputy Chief Judge Michael M. Malihi.
At issue are claims that Obama either wasn't born in the United States or that he's ineligible for re-election because his father wasn't a U.S. citizen—even though he released copies of Hawaii birth documents and other presidents had foreign-born parents
.
Malihi on Friday rejected Obama's motion to quash a subpoena for the president to appear, saying the president and his attorney Michael K. Jablonski failed to outline the legal authority for their argument. Jablonski's motion to quash said a subpoena requiring Obama's appearance for an administrative hearing was unreasonable given the president's other duties.
"I fully expect Mr. Jablonski to refile on behalf of the president a renewed motion to quash with some citations, and I expect that would probably be granted," said Irion.
Obama hadn't sought reconsideration in filings with the court by Monday. Jablonski, who has served as an attorney for the Democratic Party of Georgia, and the Obama re-election campaign declined to comment.
The president's other options include ignoring the subpoena or appealing to Superior Court. If he refuses to appear, the administrative hearings judge may refer the case to Superior Court for a finding of contempt of court, according to the rules of the Office of State Administrative Hearings.
"I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a contempt order come out if in fact Mr. Obama doesn't show up and if he doesn't renew his motion to quash and get it granted," Irion said.
Malihi's order said Obama didn't explain why the subpoena was unreasonable, oppressive, irrelevant or immaterial, which are grounds for quashing a subpoena.
"Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing," Malihi wrote. "This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority."
Plaintiffs seeking Obama's appearance don't say what they would gain from having him attend the hearing on his status. Orly Taitz, a California attorney who represents one of the plaintiffs and is a leader of the so-called "birther" movement questioning the president's eligibility, said she issued the subpoena.
Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, according to birth documents released by his campaign and newspaper birth notices published at the time. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a U.S. citizen who was born in Kansas, and his father, Barack Obama Sr., was born in Kenya, which plaintiffs say made him a British citizen.
The plaintiffs apparently believe that the U.S. Constitution's requirement that only a "natural born citizen" may be president prevents candidates with only one U.S. citizen parent.
Some of the plaintiffs also doubt the veracity of Obama's birth documents and say he hasn't proven his U.S. citizenship.
"We need a stronger check against foreign influence, so the natural born citizen issue came up," said plaintiff David Farrar, a retired Miami court reporter who now lives in Cedartown and is represented by Taitz. "If you claim executive power, you have to prove it, not presume it."
Staff Reporter Mark Niesse
-
I would definitely pay for Obama and the gang to go back to Kenya
-
Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot Access Hearing
obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ^ | 1/25/12 | breitbart
Posted on January 25, 2012 8:57:22 PM EST by Mr. K
Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of StateAdministrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client andadvising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. WhileI regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to anadministrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As thereferring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearingsscheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, Ido not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judgeto report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of thereport, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to myreview of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in theOSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to thismatter.Sincerely,Brian P. Kemp
-
Breaking News: Obama's Attorney In Georgia Ballot Challenge Refuses To Appear At Hearing
Posted on January 25, 2012 5:39:58 PM EST by Obama Exposer
President Obama's private attorney Michael Jablonski has issued a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp confirming that he will not attend the Georgia Access Ballot Challenge hearing set by the Honorable Judge Michael Malihi for January 26, 2012 at 9am.
Here is the letter from Jablonski stating the reasons why he as well as the president will not show:
Hon. Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
214 State Capitol Atlanta, Georgia 30334
via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.
Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Secretary Kemp:
This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.
Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.
For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.
It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.
Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.
In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….
As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.
All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).
The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.
We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.
Very truly yours,
MICHAEL JABLONSKI Georgia State Bar Number 385850 Attorney for President Barack Obama
cc: Hon. Michael Malihi Van Irion, Esq. Orly Taitz, Esq. Mark Hatfield, Esq. Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. Stefan Ritter, Esq. Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. Darcy Coty, Esq. Andrew B. Flake, Esq.
-
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79405341/Obama-s-Attorney-Jaberwoki-Slapped-Down-By-Georgia-SOS-1-25-2012 (http://www.scribd.com/doc/79405341/Obama-s-Attorney-Jaberwoki-Slapped-Down-By-Georgia-SOS-1-25-2012)
I don't know how to insert a scribd document
-
I'm glad Obama might be off the ballot in GA. That would be great. Let him explain to the voters why he refuses to release his records.
-
12:15 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012
After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November.
Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing.
"It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi.
"I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied.
Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote.
Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing.
In response, Kemp said the hearing to consider the challenges is required by Georgia law. "If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote.
Thursday's hearing was held before a packed courtroom with almost every seat taken -- except for those at the defendant's table facing the judge.
Find this article at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/no-ruling-in-birther-1318374.html
Print this page Close .
-
pending further confirmation, but...
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/ (http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/)
EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...
OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!
I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.
How does the mainstream media spin this?
The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!
-
:)
-
pending further confirmation, but...
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/ (http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/)
EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...
OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!
I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.
How does the mainstream media spin this?
The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!
Chuckle....you're going to be very disappointed in what happens next week.
-
Chuckle....you're going to be very disappointed in what happens next week.
Yeah - the employment report comes out. All the part time shelf stockers who got laid off will show up in the report.
-
Yeah - the employment report comes out. All the part time shelf stockers who got laid off will show up in the report.
Discuss that in another post. The sad fact is that Obama was not going to win Georgia in the election anyway but once the story is dragged back into the media, its going to allow Obama to use the situation as a trumpet call to arms in the election.
-
Discuss that in another post. The sad fact is that Obama was not going to win Georgia in the election anyway but once the story is dragged back into the media, its going to allow Obama to use the situation as a trumpet call to arms in the election.
LOL.
-
Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing In Georgia
January 26, 2012
By Breaking News 7 Comments
Update: Dean Haskins at Obama Release Your Records is saying that the Judge is entering a default judgement against Obama because he did not appear. This could mean that Obama might not appear on Georgia’s ballot, although the Obama administration will certainly appeal.
Today was an important day in the fight for truth. Despite Obama’s no-show, today’s court proceedings could have a great affect on the eligibility movement as a whole.
A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama eligibility movement and what results we might see. In the meantime, read the following blow by blow account:
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.
-
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....
-
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....
If Obama continues to default, je will be forced off the ballot in GA.
-
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....
Yea....shame on the judge who thinks that President of the United States doesn't have more important things to do than to deal with obviously frivolous bullshit like this. Makes Georgia look like the asscrack of the U.S. ::)
Its already been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that Obama is a natural born citizen and the fact is that no matter how much paperwork and records are disclosed, some people are just going to argue the latter..... ::)
-
Then why not show up in court and settle it?
-
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
She has real perseverance.
-
This was from the earlier thread just mentioned:
Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
-
Then why not show up in court and settle it?
Orly has filed these lawsuits in all 50 states multiple times. If a sitting president, senator, congressman, etc had to answer every frivolous lawsuit thrown at them then they would never get anything done. You should know that.
Its a misuse of the judicial system and a serious waste of tax dollars. One day, Orly is going to have to pay court costs for all of them but she seems to keep suckering these people to do with without telling them the consequences of doing so. She's left a bunch of people in serious debt because of this
-
Orly has filed these lawsuits in all 50 states multiple times. If a sitting president, senator, congressman, etc had to answer every frivolous lawsuit thrown at them then they would never get anything done. You should know that.
Its a misuse of the judicial system and a serious waste of tax dollars. One day, Orly is going to have to pay court costs for all of them but she seems to keep suckering these people to do with without telling them the consequences of doing so. She's left a bunch of people in serious debt because of this
Oh please obama has time to party, vacation, and campaign all day he has time for this.
Once served the summons and complaint, all his lawyer needed to do is file responsive documents attached to the Answer and filed for a motion for Summ Judgment if it was that clear.
But its not since we all know obama is a liar, a fraud, and the sham wow potus.
-
Bush ignored supoeans from CONGRESS and repubs thought it was funny.
Obama ignores a summons from some low level judge (to the same lawsuit filed in 50 states and rejected in 49 states)...
and suddenly repubs care about it? lolzercopterwhirlybird.. .
-
Bush ignored supoeans from CONGRESS and repubs thought it was funny.
Obama ignores a summons from some low level judge (to the same lawsuit filed in 50 states and rejected in 49 states)...
and suddenly repubs care about it? lolzercopterwhirlybird.. .
Fail. The two have nothing to do with one another.
Obama is being sued as an individual the same way Clinton was in the Paula Jones case.
-
Fail. The two have nothing to do with one another.
Obama is being sued as an individual the same way Clinton was in the Paula Jones case.
yeah, but seriously, this lawsuit was rejected in 49 of 50 courts... and did you ever seriously believe ANY us president would travel to georgia to beg some dipshit judge to drop the charges? lol I mean really, no president would do this. It ain't about Obama... I'm sure if i cared more about this thread than I did about this bagel, i would look it up, but I'm sure bush was sued as an individual as president, and he probably laughed it out the door.
-
yeah, but seriously, this lawsuit was rejected in 49 of 50 courts... and did you ever seriously believe ANY us president would travel to georgia to beg some dipshit judge to drop the charges? lol I mean really, no president would do this. It ain't about Obama... I'm sure if i cared more about this thread than I did about this bagel, i would look it up, but I'm sure bush was sued as an individual as president, and he probably laughed it out the door.
Those cases were on the standing issue, this is on the merits. Additionally - if it were so clear - why hasny obama shown up via his lawyer w proof?
If this communist usurper above the law on this too now?
-
why hasn't obama shown up? a little thing called POLITICS
You don't swing down. You don't give fuel to Rush and the other ass-hats. And yes, i have lost all respect for conservative radio hosts, who have crushed ron paul with nonstop attacks because they dont want their guy to lose.
anyway, obama shows up, and it's all Rush talks about, it's all the political world talks about. That's not smart politics. Obama is doing very little and saying very little - he's letting the repubs destory themselves. Obama can literally go live in paris for 10 monts and probably win this eleciton.
-
why hasn't obama shown up? a little thing called POLITICS
You don't swing down. You don't give fuel to Rush and the other ass-hats. And yes, i have lost all respect for conservative radio hosts, who have crushed ron paul with nonstop attacks because they dont want their guy to lose.
anyway, obama shows up, and it's all Rush talks about, it's all the political world talks about. That's not smart politics. Obama is doing very little and saying very little - he's letting the repubs destory themselves. Obama can literally go live in paris for 10 monts and probably win this eleciton.
No it is not politics - ITS THE FUCKING LAW!
-
No it is not politics - ITS THE FUCKING LAW!
and if you attain enough political power, you can circumvent the law.
pardons, jurisdictions, protections of the office, and just the simple knowledge that the court is wasting its time.
Look at the way alberto gonzalez 'forgot' shit that happened 2 weeks ago. Look at the way clinton and libby and a million others can lie without consequence.
Dont ya get it? if you are rich and have political power, the law doesn't apply to you. So your phrase "It's the FUCKING LAW" doesn't apply to Obama, my friend.
it's the reality of the world.
-
Oh please obama has time to party, vacation, and campaign all day he has time for this.
Once served the summons and complaint, all his lawyer needed to do is file responsive documents attached to the Answer and filed for a motion for Summ Judgment if it was that clear.
But its not since we all know obama is a liar, a fraud, and the sham wow potus.
Orly Tariz has filed over 200 different lawsuits in the past 3 years. Do you seriously expect the President to take time from running the country to answer junk lawsuits like this.
This is the reason for laws like sovereign immunity, to prevent stuff like this. Unfortunately, once this gets thrown out, the people Orly suckered into filing will have to pay court cost and lawyers fees just like the rest of the people who did the same.
BTW, you don't know shit about the law. You can't file for a summary judgement in a preliminary hearing.... ::)
-
I wish people would put this kind of effort into just making sure elections can't be rigged.
-
Free Republic
Browse · Search Pings · Mail Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Eligibility Judge About To Lower The Boom On Barack?
Western Center for Journalism ^ | Jan 28, 2012 | Doug Book
Posted on January 29, 2012 3:08:18 PM EST by bkopto
... Well Obama had been subpoenaed to appear in that courtroom. The subpoena had been specifically and without reservation upheld by Judge Malihi just 6 days earlier. So Obama was in obvious violation of the court’s order.
So maybe, just maybe Judge Malihi read the final words of Jablonski’s hyper arrogant, “we don’t believe your little state or your silly hearing are worth our time” letter for the purpose of reading into the record the fact that it was indeed the decision of Obama and his attorney to NOT attend and to NOT honor legal subpoenas.
And if that is the case, it means Malihi is clearing the decks for either a default judgment against the president, or the implementation of a legal remedy of some sort for Obama’s self-important refusal to appear or even respond to the proceeding with counsel.
Naturally it would take an attorney to decipher any “legal” significance in Malihi’s actions, but through his past rulings the judge has made it abundantly clear that he will follow the laws of the state of Georgia to the letter and accept no grandstanding or phony arguments from either side, not even from a president.
And it is against the law to ignore a subpoena, perhaps all the more so when the judge himself refused to allow Obama’s earlier request that the subpoena be quashed.
It might be significant that Georgia Secretary of State Kemp backed Malihi to the hilt in his response to Michael Jablonski’s letter, telling the lawyer “…If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”
In short, though you and your client clearly don’t think much of our state or its laws, we will conduct the business of both just as though you were mere mortals rather than privileged characters.
When will Judge Malihi issue a ruling and what weight of law will it carry? Attorneys for both sides have until February 5th to present additional evidence for their claims. Soon after that we will know how determined the State of Georgia is in seeing to it their laws are obeyed…even by a president.
-
Free Republic
Browse · Search Pings · Mail News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Media Blackout in Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Case
American Thinker ^ | January 30, 2012 | Cindy Simpson
Posted on January 30, 2012 5:08:32 AM EST by matt1
Last week, I noted that Obama turned his back not just on Arizona's Governor Jan Brewer, but also on the laws of the State of Georgia. I closed my column, "Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks on By," with the observation: "And most of the media has followed along right behind him."
At the time, I had just witnessed an historic hearing that actually discussed the eligibility of the sitting president of the United States to run for a second term. The president had been subpoenaed to appear, and instead of his attorney respectfully following protocol to have that subpoena recalled, both Obama and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, simply failed to show up at all or offer any defense whatsoever.
Isn't there a headline in there somewhere?
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/media_blackout_in_obama_georgia_ballot_eligibility_case.html#ixzz1kvxbTSEd
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
-
SEARCH TERM - "Nixon subpoena" gave 781,000 returns even though the internet wasn't around during Watergate. For those old enough to remember, it was all over the news on a nightly basis.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=nixon+subpoena&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
About 781,000 results (0.16 seconds)
SEARCH TERM - "Clinton subpoena" and Whitewater and Lewinski were all over the news.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=clinton+subpoena&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
About 1,230,000 results (0.16 seconds)
SEARCH TERM - "Obama subpoena" And what are we hearing on the news? Practically a total blackout.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=obama+subpoena&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
About 648,000 results (0.09 seconds)
PRAVDA
-
Nice follow-up on the hearing.
http://www.birthersummit.org/news/80-georgia-hearings-two-out-of-three-aint-bad.html
GEORGIA HEARINGS – TWO OUT OF THREE AIN'T BAD
Posted by: Dean C. Haskins
dean@birthersummit.org
202.241.3648
Posted: January 30, 2012
© 2012 The Birther Summit
Download a PDF
Author's Request: If you are not going to read the conclusion of this article, please do not read any of it. Those whose critical thinking skills are limited, either genetically, or willfully, are required to read the conclusion at least three times before sending me your zombie hate mail.
Once again, in the days following the hearings that were conducted in Georgia on January 26, there has been a lot of spin and misinformation coming from our side; while much of it comes from simply being overzealous about the hearings, we must be vigilant to stay on the side of truth.
But, before I get into that, I want to explain some things about the issues that we faced with the live video streaming. I was brought into the live streaming process pretty late in the game, and while my background and experience are in studio audio, before this past week, I had never been involved in any live streaming video project. We did visit the courtroom on Wednesday to assess the layout, but the facility had no wireless internet available, and our wireless card that had been shipped to Atlanta had not yet arrived; so, we were not able to test the live streaming in the courtroom. Moreover, the Media was relegated to the rear of the courtroom, and there was no allowance for placing any microphones at the front.
Ultimately, we gained a mountain of experiential knowledge through this first attempt, and will use what we learned to perfect our future live video streaming projects.
The First Two Cases Heard
The courtroom was packed and hot, and there was a constant flurry of activity throughout the morning. Things were said, and half-explained, in the midst of the surrounding confusion, so I want to take a moment to clarify the essence of what happened, now that there's been some time to accurately recount the events of the day.
Just as we witnessed internet postings falsely proclaiming that many individuals had been “subpoenaed” or “ordered by a judge” to appear in Atlanta, as well as repeated claims of there being a “trial” (instead of what they were—administrative hearings), that same kind of self-serving, inaccurate headline-manufacturing has resulted in claims that a “judge has ordered that Obama will not appear on the Georgia ballot.” Folks, not only has that not happened, Judge Malihi will not be issuing any such “order.” He will only be issuing a recommendation to Secretary of State Kemp, who will ultimately decide.
Prior to the start of the hearings on Thursday, the judge called the three attorneys who were present into his chambers and said that he could award them a default order because the defendant did not show up, but the attorneys stated that they would prefer to present abbreviated versions of their arguments so that they would be on the record, in case there were any appeals.
Their having chosen to present evidence, therefore, precluded a default order, as such an order is awarded in the absence of any evidence being presented. The fact that evidence was presented means that Judge Malihi must make his recommendation based upon that evidence. It is the understanding of the first two attorneys to present their cases that, whichever way the judge decides will ultimately result in an appeal, and with their evidence being presented, they have prepared their cases to proceed to the highest court in the land, if necessary. The third case, as presented, didn't, and won't, go anywhere.
The cases presented by attorneys Irion and Hatfield had nothing to do with any claims regarding Obama's birthplace or his birth certificate. In fact, Van Irion's plaintiff stipulated to the birth certificate that had been posted online, which means that, for the purposes of his case, his plaintiff accepted its validity as part of the court record. He merely used what is claimed to be a valid birth certificate to establish the fact that Obama's father was a foreign national, and never a US citizen. Mark Hatfield's plaintiffs relied on parental divorce records to establish the same fact. Neither attorney was concerned with anything other than arguing that Barack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be president because of his father's lack of US citizenship.
At this point in the proceedings, and in light of the basis of much of the third case, I believe an attorney who either understood the law, or who had an actual interest in succeeding with that case, would have at least voiced an objection to attorney Irion's stipulation of the birth certificate, even if, for no other reason, than to have the objection entered into the record. However, the third attorney made no such objection.
Having quickly presented their evidence, the judge called for a brief recess, at which time, Irion and Hatfield asked for the record to be closed in their cases. While speculation resulted that they requested the closing of their cases to prevent the defendant from providing evidence, I do not believe that was their purpose, as was evidenced in their open, and calculated, exit from the courtroom before the beginning of the third hearing, and not returning. They wanted it understood that they would have nothing to do with the third case, and closed the record on their cases to keep the third case from diluting theirs.
Now, before proceeding with my report, let me say that, before Thursday, I had never personally met Orly Taitz. After she entered the courtroom, she approached the Media area, where I was standing with our live streaming equipment, and she asked, “Are you Dean Haskins?” I extended my hand and said, “Yes, how are you doing, Orly?” Without reciprocating the handshake, she stated, “I think it is about time for an apology,” to which I replied, “You can apologize to me anytime you want.” Through clenched teeth, Orly quietly seethed, “You're a piece of sh*t. You shouldn't even be here.” Classy.
It is not really necessary to go into a detailed analysis of Orly's presentation of her case, as there was little proffered that could be viewed as proper construction of a legal argument, or even a coherent presentation of evidence, but there are some points I believe need to be made.
As I have stated, Orly has grossly misrepresented the facts in her part of these cases, and, as I had previously remarked, any of the subpoenas she simply mailed to people who reside outside the state of Georgia weren't worth the paper on which the blank subpoena forms were downloaded and printed. Judge Malihi neither issued them, nor personally signed them. But, that's not what Orly stated to her faithful followers. Before the day of the hearings, jbjd came to the same conclusion. In fact, as many times as it has been pointed out that these were “administrative hearings” and not “trials,” Orly is still claiming her hearing was a trial. I have also recently read that Orly was “the principal attorney,” and that she “was the one responsible for these cases being heard.” That is an outright lie, as she injected herself into these cases very late in the process, and at the probable dismay of the other plaintiffs. It was the work of Swensson, Powell, Irion, Hatfield, and Weldon, which had been ongoing for more than two years, that brought these hearings to fruition.
As to my previous explanation that Orly's subpoena to Loretta Fuddy, which included a demand for certain documents of identification pertaining to Barack Obama, was completely unenforceable since Hawaii law prohibits the release of those documents to someone without a direct and tangible interest, and that a Georgia ALJ has no jurisdiction over Hawaii (something first-year law students would readily understand), Judge Malihi denied her request for that reason (although, as of this writing, Orly has chosen not to post that denial). Additionally, it appears that Orly may have knowingly gone outside the bounds of the law in a statement she made trying to coerce a Hawaiian court to provide certain documents to her.
On January 19, 2012, Orly filed an Ex Parte Amended Motion for Reconsideration under 60B in Honolulu, which was denied by Judge Nishamura. On page 5 of that motion is the following language: “I, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, declare under penalty of perjury, that I was given commission and subpoena (attached) to conduct deposition and examination of records of witness Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health.” Interestingly, what she stated “under penalty of perjury” never happened. It was a lie. Not only did she never go before Judge Malihi to obtain a commission prior to January 26, on January 27 Judge Malihi denied her request for such commission due to lack of jurisdiction (precisely as predicted). I would be surprised if this little tidbit doesn't get included in whatever Deputy AG Nagamine files with Judge Nishamura concerning Taitz.
If there were any questions regarding whether or not Orly is truly interested in proving anything in a courtroom about Barack Obama, those questions were finally put to rest last Thursday. Putting aside the abysmal legal performance we have all come to expect (which was certainly replayed on Thursday), and seeing the constant shameless appeals for donations (since her expenses to conduct her HEARING were so great), why would Orly have spent the money to hire a personal professional videographer to capture her every move in the courtroom? If Orly's case wasn't all about Orly (rather than proving anything about Barack Obama), what possible motivation could she have had for such an extravagance? And, I'm not quite sure how she plans to use the footage of her transitioning from a closing argument, to taking the stand and testifying, and then back to a closing argument (at Judge Malihi's insistence), but it would probably be very useful in a “How-Not-To” video somewhere.
And, to what did she “testify”? While “testifying” about Barack Obama's Illinois Bar Application, Judge Malihi asked Orly what “personal knowledge” she had about the document (this is a common “legal” question), and Orly's response was that she had downloaded the image from the internet herself. Really? Did an attorney actually say that to a judge? I don't know if I could have been more embarrassed.
But, far and above the horrendous incompetence, unmerited self-promotion, and inexplicably inaccurate self-image, is Orly's proclivity still to throw people under the bus in an effort to provide cover for her ineptitude. While most everything about Orly's public persona is deplorable, this must be her most depraved character flaw.
In a ridiculous posting in which Orly spoke dishonestly about Sheriff Joe, she included abhorrent and wholly undeserved comments about Mara Zebest and Tom Harrigan (although, she didn't even get Mara's name correct). In essence, she stated that, if Zebest and Harrigan wouldn't agree to be a part of her absurd circus, then they are “totally worthless,” and “their opinion is of no value.” But, the fact that there was even a posting about Sheriff Joe in the first place should indicate to any sane individual that Orly is singularly the most damaging element of the entire eligibility movement (more on that in a minute).
It is clear that Orly does not want Sheriff Joe to garner any possible limelight for the efforts that he and his Cold Case Posse have expended, and her fake subpoena to him was an attempt to have that evidence presented as part of HER hearing (for then, she could somehow claim the evidence as her own). It needs to be understood that this is truly reprehensible behavior. To the one and only law enforcement official in the country who has stepped up to the plate and is conducting a thoroughly professional investigation, he deserves our utmost gratitude; but, after Sheriff Joe rightfully and commendably ignored Orly's downloaded unenforceable “subpoena,” Orly tried to elevate herself by diminishing him. That is censurable conduct, folks!
How can I assert that this was Orly's attempt to steal Sheriff Joe's evidence, and claim it as her own? From her website:
“Arpaio’s unwillingness to testify tells me that:
a. he does not have any new evidence aside from what I provided him.”
I have spoken several times with the Posse's lead investigator, and that statement couldn't be further from the truth. For those Orlyites out there, that is what is technically called a “lie.”
Also, Orly has been repeatedly vocal against proactive groups in our movement, such as Article2SuperPAC, ObamaReleaseYourRecords, Obama State Ballot Challenge, and GiveUsLiberty1776, but those entities deserve our full gratitude and support, as they are truly working for the benefit of our cause, and are not daily sabotaging it. Short of libel, I couldn't care less what Orly, or anyone else, says about me, but I will not stand idly by while she calls into question the characters and motivations of these good people.
I also commend jbjd.org as trustworthy commentary that cuts through the deceptive hype many in our movement have blindly accepted at face value.
Conclusion
Before sending me any hate emails like the ones I've already received, there are now ground rules involved. You must include this statement: “I, (state your name), declare under penalty of perjury, that I have read this conclusion at least three times.” Additionally, such hate mail must be constrained to refuting what I have stated. Personal attacks devoid of such refutation will demonstrate a lack of critical thinking skills on the part of the sender, and relegate such hate mail to the insignificant and unworthy of consideration.
Folks, I'm angry; not in a personal way, but fundamentally in regards to our cause. I have poured my time and energy into this issue as a quest for truth . . . nothing more, nothing less. When I see us publicly lauding disgraceful behavior, and honoring deception, then I fear we have lost our way in what we are doing. Such blanket approval of that is indicative of abject hatred overruling thoughtful objectivity. If we are willing to disregard truth and decency in our quest toward a goal, then we should re-examine our motivation for that goal.
On any given day, I can scroll through the headlines on Orly's website, and it literally turns my stomach. The contents are typically morally and ethically questionable; thus, I have a hard time believing that those who openly and totally support such, are not also lacking in morals and ethics—and I, personally, do not want to believe that! But, the tension that such an inconsistency produces in my conscience is the reason I believe I must speak up. I refuse to sear my conscience through my silence.
I am aware that most of those who are actually working in this movement do not disagree with me; however, there is a remnant who have not yet figured it out for themselves. To those who would accuse me of being “divisive,” or “hurting our cause,” if being truthful is divisive to a cause, then there's either something wrong with the cause, or the people within the cause. I cannot, in good conscience, tolerate aberrant behavior simply as a way to further the cause—and what some have not yet learned is that, as long as we do accept it, our cause will continue to be severely handicapped.
We have gained a toehold in Georgia (Orly had absolutely nothing to do with that, regardless of what she claims), and we owe a debt of gratitude to the plaintiffs and attorneys in the first two cases that were heard. However, if we continue to allow ourselves to be equated with the preposterous antics of the third case, we are doomed. The Media will always gravitate to that which makes it easiest to ridicule and vilify us—and, we saw that again this past week.
For those who are still unconvinced, take a few days and actually investigate the facts—and ignore every single word Orly says about Orly, or against anyone else. Obama himself could not have set into action a more brilliant ploy to keep him safe in the White House. If one forces himself to research and study the facts, apart from the repeatedly baseless claims, he will necessarily come to the same conclusion, for the facts themselves do not lie.
I am aware of so much more that I cannot divulge, as it would not be fair to those who have shared those things with me. If they want to come forward with such information, that will be up to them—I will not betray their confidence.
In the end, the hate emails I have received have been from those who are not aware of the truth (from a lack of real research, and reliance on the constant deception), cannot understand the truth, or who know the truth, but choose to ignore it. The last group are the ones I most fear regarding our cause, as they will ultimately be the “divisive” ones, and will be the ones who keep us relegated to the circus sideshow.
Again, if I must be hated for speaking the truth, then so be it. But, if you're going to send me a message to let me know just how much you hate me, it had better be because you can refute what I've said, and not because you just don't like it. I am completely open to being proved wrong where the facts are concerned—and, if you want to share your hatred with me, I hope you DO try to refute the facts, because then you will at least have to face them.
Peace, if possible, but the truth at any rate. - Martin Luther
-
Free Republic
Browse · Search Pings · Mail News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
‘Green light’ to see Obama’s Hawaii files [It's about time !]
WND ^ | January 31, 2012 | Bob Unruh
Posted on January 31, 2012 9:43:27 PM EST by RobinMasters
An attorney who presented evidence to a Georgia judge last week on Barack Obama’s eligibility for the state’s 2012 presidential ballot believes she now has a right to demand to see his original Hawaii documents.
Obama last April released what he said was a copy of his original Hawaii birth documentation, but a number of imaging, document and computer experts contend it is a fraud.
The original birth documentation could undermine Obama’s claim to be a “natural-born citizen,” as the Constitution requires. Many of his critics, however, say the birth documentation doesn’t matter, because Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen. The Founders likely understood “natural-born citizen” to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens.
Now California attorney Orly Taitz, who has brought a number of major legal challenges to Obama’s eligibility in various courts up to the U.S. Supreme Court, has told WND that when Obama and his lawyer wrote a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp last week refusing to attend the hearing on Obama’s eligibility status, they included a copy of the image that the White House released last April.
They also sent a copy to the court of Judge Michael Malihi, the hearing officer, whose ruling is expected to be made available in the next few days.
That act, Taitz explained, effectively gave the court a copy of the White House documentation, and under ordinary rules of evidence the opposing side is supposed to have access to the original to verify the authenticity of the purported copy.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
-
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
Return to the Article
February 1, 2012
Obama Got Served
Cindy Simpson
Obama was served a subpoena to appear in a hearing last week in Georgia over his eligibility to appear on the state's ballot. Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski, immediately filed a motion to quash the subpoena, which was denied by OSAH Judge Michael Malihi. In his denial, Judge Malihi seemed to leave open the possibility for a quash, if Jablonski had only offered appropriate legal authority in support. The judge asserted that "Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority."
Instead of respectfully following procedure, however, Jablonski went over the judge's head and straight to Secretary of State Brian Kemp with a letter, sent the day before the hearings were scheduled, arguing that the entire matter should be dropped as it was "baseless, costly and unproductive[.]" Jablonski's letter concluded: "We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26."
Kemp responded that his office lacked authority under Georgia law to suspend the hearings, and warned Jablonski that "if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril."
Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.
Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.
The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi. Irion asserts that "... Defendant Obama willfully defied this Court's order to appear and testify[,]" and his "actions represent a direct threat to the entire judicial branch and the separation of powers between the branches of government." Irion argued that "uch a declaration cannot go without response from this Court" and moved that the Court refer the "matter to the Superior Court of Fulton County for confirmation that the Defendant violated Administrative Rules of Procedure ... and to determine appropriate sanctions."
Now, will we get the opportunity to debate the meaning of "subpoena" -- or whether the law even applies to this president?
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/obama_got_served.html at February 01, 2012 - 09:07:18 PM CST
-
Georgia Judge Orders Obama off the Ballot
Conservative Action Alerts ^ | January 27, 2012 | Conservative Action Alerts
...Here’s how a report from inside the courtroom yesterday summed it up:
“One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of ‘Natural Born Citizen’ provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President… it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot. It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.”
Another insider who had access to the lawyers involved in the case yesterday reported:
“Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama’s name not be on the Georgia ballot… The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge’s recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!”
If the judge follows through on his promise, this will be a HUGE VICTORY!...
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeactionalerts .com ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AWESOME!!!!
-
F U C K !!!!!
Someone got to this guy. WTF!!! How does a party efault, present no evidence at all, and get a ruling in their favor?
Judge Malihi Rules Against Plaintiffs: Says Obama Born In Hawaii Therefore Natural Born Citizen
BirtherReport.com ^ | 2/3/2012 | Kevin Powell
We just spoke with plaintiff Kevin Powell and he reports Judge Malihi has ruled against the Plaintiffs and stated in his order that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore Obama is a natural born Citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
I wish people would put this kind of effort into just making sure elections can't be rigged.
good call
-
F U C K !!!!!
Someone got to this guy. WTF!!! How does a party efault, present no evidence at all, and get a ruling in their favor?
Judge Malihi Rules Against Plaintiffs: Says Obama Born In Hawaii Therefore Natural Born Citizen
BirtherReport.com ^ | 2/3/2012 | Kevin Powell
We just spoke with plaintiff Kevin Powell and he reports Judge Malihi has ruled against the Plaintiffs and stated in his order that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore Obama is a natural born Citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the first proceeding was a preliminary hearing. Once it went to trial, it was then thrown out.
Would have been nicer for the Judge to dismiss beforehand but I guess he wanted to get Orly's hopes up and then smash them to pieces......brutal pwning!!!! How do you feel now 333386??? ;D
Oh by the way...now the Plaintiffs will have to pay court cost and attorney fees....just like the rest. :-X
-
I feel like justice was not served
-
I feel like justice was not served
Justice was done but those people Orly suckered into filing the lawsuit will have to take out a second mortgage on their homes and get a second job to pay off the court fees and attorneys.
-
Justice was done but those people Orly suckered into filing the lawsuit will have to take out a second mortgage on their homes and get a second job to pay off the court fees and attorneys.
This judge was approached.
-
hahaha wow who would have thought it would end that way :D :D
-
This judge was approached.
No the fuck he wasn't..... ::)