Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Training Q&A => Topic started by: GET_BIGGER on December 20, 2005, 07:32:57 AM

Title: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: GET_BIGGER on December 20, 2005, 07:32:57 AM
Came across an article yesterday in which basicall said not to use a belt while squatting.  At first it struck we wierd because I guess I have always been on the belt side of the fence. 

Basically the reason is that when you wear the belt it puts strain and pressure on your spine.  Then when put weight on, it multiplies.  So theres almost twice the strain on your spine while squatting then if you didn't wear a belt.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Ledd on December 20, 2005, 08:38:02 AM
So wearing a belt actually puts more strain on your spine?  I dont understand how this is a good thing.  I never wear a belt anyway though.
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Bear03 on December 20, 2005, 08:55:31 AM
That doesn't really make sense....maybe if you do it wrong....

I like to use a belt on my heavier squats, but that's it.
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: JPM on December 20, 2005, 09:34:37 AM
Actually more stress will be put upon the ab's and can restrict normal breathing. That's why a lifting belt, super cinched up, should only be used for 2 or 3 max rep's at the most. Lifting belts should not be worn during a complete workout, really no need to. A lot of guy's like wearing them because it can make the waist look smaller and the lats more wider. Vanity reasons only.

If your serious about it than your going to have to get a custom made belt for your body with extra support around the small of the back and even with that you may have to put a folded towel behind there for even more support. Belts are more useful for PL'ers aand Olympic lifters than the regular BB'er.

Lot's of pro's & con's about wearing a belt even during heavy lifts. Take you choice of wearing one or not but in my view there really not needed at all for the support that they are meant to give. Good luck.
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Cavalier22 on December 20, 2005, 12:32:16 PM
yeah i read in MD sometime that in studies belts were actually worse for your back tha no belts. 

but than again, i bet a year from now they will have the exact same article with the conclusion reversed
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Loomis on December 20, 2005, 12:56:42 PM
I never wear a belt. I don't feel it's neccesary as I've never reall had any lower-back pain. If I did, I'd consider it.
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Carmello on December 20, 2005, 04:56:14 PM
I used to wear a belt, thinking that because i was tall that i needed extra back support. One time I forgot to bring my belt to workout, and lifted way more weight than with the belt. Turns out the belt was counter productive. Stopped wearing it since that day just over a year ago.  Never had a problem since, just make sure your form is tight!
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: bmacsys on December 21, 2005, 05:49:20 AM
When I started lifting in 1978 everybody wore a belt. Now I see very few people wearing one. I prefer to wear one.
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Overload on December 21, 2005, 09:18:33 AM
Most belts don't do shit but support you in the upright position. do you really think it is helping your back when you are bent forward slightly doing a squat? the only belts that work are the thick inzer type belts that are so fucking tight you need 400 pounds on your shoulders just to squat down. no reason at all to use one unless you are maxing out and need some "help" or extra "support". the most powerful guys at my gym use them for max attempts only. these guys squat high 600's and dead the same. i haven't used a belt in years and i haven't had any back problems.

 8)
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: Beelzebub on January 05, 2006, 06:50:55 AM
i use an inzer belt on the last 2 sets of squat (basically once i hit over 400+).  can't use one on anything else, especially deadlift.  feels like it's going to break my ribs when i bend over for the start position. 
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: BigIronMike25 on January 13, 2006, 08:27:34 AM
I've always heard, read, and believed that wearing a belt really does make the lower back weaker and more injury-prone!
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: GET_BIGGER on January 13, 2006, 08:56:36 AM
i use an inzer belt on the last 2 sets of squat (basically once i hit over 400+).  can't use one on anything else, especially deadlift.  feels like it's going to break my ribs when i bend over for the start position. 

Thats what I do to and it seems to have been working fine.  Hopefully I will increase the strength in my back and I wont need a belt up to 500 on day, then 600 then I will retire  ;D.  I also didn't wrap it as tight and it seemed to benefit me more.  But it is such a psychological thing to not have it on your heaviest lifts would be hard. 
Title: Re: Belt vs. no belt
Post by: LatsMcGee on January 14, 2006, 11:38:02 AM
(http://www.brickflick.com/ronn/foreigner.gif)