Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Army of One on November 04, 2013, 05:55:56 AM

Title: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Army of One on November 04, 2013, 05:55:56 AM
Since current day naturals like Simeon Panda and friends are bigger because of improved Weider principles, nutrient timing, whey protein and horny goat weed, maybe these guys who are smaller were natty?

(http://i28.tinypic.com/akbgi8.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVfhPLTIAAAOv65.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: SilverSpoon on November 04, 2013, 11:44:48 AM
You can see fairly obvious photoshopping in the 2nd picture as well.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Tito24 on November 04, 2013, 11:48:29 AM
who are these criminals?
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Rudee on November 04, 2013, 11:54:50 AM
Easily achievable naturally with a little bee pollen, a sweet potato, and a half dozen raw squirrel eggs a day. 
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: _aj_ on November 04, 2013, 11:57:42 AM
Panda's chest to waist ratio is like 2:1. Ridiculous.

Easily attainable with Weider Principles and creatine.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Rambone on November 04, 2013, 12:10:02 PM
Quote from: _aj_ on November 04, 2013, 11:57:42 AM
Panda's chest to waist ratio is like 2:1. Ridiculous.

Easily attainable with Weider Principles and creatine.

4 words......Weider Pre-Exhaustion Training Principles
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Army of One on November 04, 2013, 12:31:55 PM
Natural Pandas in their native habitat are stronger than those reared in an artificial environment.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: TrueGrit on November 04, 2013, 12:34:04 PM
Whitey needs dbol just to have the natural test levels of those fine Hebrew boys..
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: arce1988 on November 04, 2013, 12:36:13 PM
   NOT
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: flex933 on November 04, 2013, 04:12:40 PM
Panda not even close to Arnold or Lou and not as good conditioned as Zane... Bad pic
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Kwon_2 on November 04, 2013, 07:45:02 PM
Quote from: Army of One on November 04, 2013, 05:55:56 AM
Since current day naturals like Simeon Panda and friends are bigger because of improved Weider principles, nutrient timing, whey protein and horny goat weed, maybe these guys who are smaller were natty?

(http://i28.tinypic.com/akbgi8.jpg)

Arnold looked huge there! Made Lou look slender (the angle was helping of course) :D
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: tommywishbone on November 04, 2013, 07:48:09 PM
Great shot.   Arnold is huge. Zane looks soft for Zane but still good- but Ferrigno is clearly the tighest and best conditioned in the photo. His face is drawn and gaunt, his abs are deep and his serratus and intercoastals are showing even though he is relaxed. Franco's forearm is just visible on the extreme left.  ;)
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Shockwave on November 04, 2013, 08:09:00 PM
Quote from: tommywishbone on November 04, 2013, 07:48:09 PM
Great shot.   Arnold is huge. Zane looks soft for Zane but still good- but Ferrigno is clearly the tighest and best conditioned in the photo. His face is drawn and gaunt, his abs are deep and his serratus and intercoastals are showing even though he is relaxed. Franco's forearm is just visible on the extreme left.  ;)
Lou looks killer there.
Arnold destroyed his mind though.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on November 04, 2013, 08:12:44 PM
74 Olympia . . . Lou came in very light, Zane destroyed Franco.

THE BEEF
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: galeniko on November 04, 2013, 08:17:16 PM
you can SEE they are natural!

the picture itself is the proof!

open your eyes.

do you see a needle stuck in them?

do you see them munching on orals?

no?see, natural.

Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: thebrink on November 05, 2013, 04:48:00 PM
black guy on the right most likely natural.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Obvious Gimmick on November 06, 2013, 12:17:46 AM
As natural as 2 shirtless guys taking a few pictures before settling down for some nice toilet wine
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: OTHstrong on November 06, 2013, 12:41:28 AM
Quote from: thebrink on November 05, 2013, 04:48:00 PM
black guy on the right most likely natural.
NOPE, naturals DO NOT get capped delts. Minus the delts he can pass though
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: _bruce_ on November 06, 2013, 05:45:23 AM
Looked fantastic.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: thebrink on November 06, 2013, 02:47:49 PM
Quote from: Onetimehard on November 06, 2013, 12:41:28 AM
NOPE, naturals DO NOT get capped delts. Minus the delts he can pass though

creatine and 'ripped freak'

he prolly only weights 185
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 06, 2013, 02:52:45 PM
Quote from: Hurricane Beef ! on November 04, 2013, 08:12:44 PM
74 Olympia . . . Lou came in very light, Zane destroyed Franco.

THE BEEF

I agree , Zane looked better
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 06, 2013, 04:54:16 PM
That's not Forest Whitaker on the right.
Title: Re: Were these guys natural?
Post by: Hulkotron on November 06, 2013, 04:58:56 PM
Why are their forearms touching?