Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: chess315 on November 07, 2013, 03:35:31 PM

Title: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: chess315 on November 07, 2013, 03:35:31 PM
 if any I'm just curious if anyone has opinions on the matter. My personal guess is at least some
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: shrek on November 07, 2013, 03:55:34 PM
That's a theory of some folks ..... some believe that the hormone will favor the muscle injected but others say it has to enter the the system first and will be distributed according to receptors volume . Its kind of like spot reduction of fat, if you do a lot of crunches you will burn abdominal fat first which in some arguments it sounds true " the muscle that is working and needs energy will draw from the nearest storage" I think it does but in such a small amount that its not really worth worrying about... now I would say if he injected all the time in his bi's its as if he was injecting synthol in there at a lower volume...... years back that's why I did the bi's and calves but it hurt so I said fuck it
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: anabolichalo on November 07, 2013, 04:48:37 PM
great post shrek


i think that injecting biceps would make them more prone to tears
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: shrek on November 07, 2013, 06:04:31 PM
great post shrek


i think that injecting biceps would make them more prone to tears
I didn't want to use synthol so when I was doing tren ace I would inject ED so I would split the shot with pharma test e and inject 1-2 cc in the bi's inner then outer and and the same with the calves and on those days I would go straight to the gym and pump the fuck out of them ........ if you want pain do that..... hell I remember about 4 years ago ALPHA PHARMA  had some NPP  and I did the same and it brought tears to my eyes after they got sore .... it was a very bad batch and I had a shitload I would give them away I couldn't bring myself to sell them
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: galeniko on November 07, 2013, 06:10:21 PM
none.

those were legit arms

what is this, jsut bc they were big there must be some trick?

Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: shrek on November 07, 2013, 06:16:54 PM
none.

those were legit arms

what is this, jsut bc they were big there must be some trick?


ha that's funny you say that .... its like my thread where everyone is trying to figure out how I can be a certain size and weight at lower amounts of drugs "THERES GOTTA BE A TRICK OR A FACTOR"  :D
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: shrek on November 07, 2013, 06:21:28 PM
He had those arms from the get go ..... as he grew they grew they shape never changed nor did the proportion of his arm . The arm was of the same proportion from the start some are blesses that way some pike me have smaller arm the shoulder ratio I can grow my back late and traps like no other but the arms aren't as fast . People say I used to be wider and traps a lot bigger and I tell them yes but they didn't fit my arms so I hit them less intense now a days hit arms 3 x a week now and calves almost daily
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: jude2 on November 07, 2013, 07:17:19 PM
none.

those were legit arms

what is this, jsut bc they were big there must be some trick?


Correct.  No oil there. They injected in their gluts mainly back then. Some did the delta, but the ass was the first choice. They had their shirts off a lot even in the gyms and did't want people to see bruises.
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: chess315 on November 08, 2013, 04:21:14 AM
i find it hard to think they didnt inject arms a lot they really didnt have the knowledge then it wouldnt cause site specific growth my thoughts are all of them had to good of arms for them not to have some trick in that era who knows
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: OTHstrong on November 08, 2013, 06:14:48 AM
great post shrek


i think that injecting biceps would make them more prone to tears
There is NO differenece in the effect of oil from synthol as there is in oil from gear, non, hence if synthol makes behemoth arms so would site injecting if done often enough with the same amount.

So why do we not see synthol like arms on people who site inject because unlike the synthol freaks they are not doing 15cc of gear in each bicep daily.

My point is oil from synthol does not necessarily tear a muscle so why would oil from gear do that?..

As for Arnold, I doubt it, like jude said, frequent injection in the biceps would cause bruises on a regular basis and Arnold always had his shirt off.
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: OTHstrong on November 08, 2013, 06:17:48 AM
I didn't want to use synthol so when I was doing tren ace I would inject ED so I would split the shot with pharma test e and inject 1-2 cc in the bi's inner then outer and and the same with the calves and on those days I would go straight to the gym and pump the fuck out of them ........ if you want pain do that..... hell I remember about 4 years ago ALPHA PHARMA  had some NPP  and I did the same and it brought tears to my eyes after they got sore .... it was a very bad batch and I had a shitload I would give them away I couldn't bring myself to sell them
holy shit bro, you have been in the trenches, man that sounds painful  :-\
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: anabolichalo on November 08, 2013, 10:18:28 AM
There is NO differenece in the effect of oil from synthol as there is in oil from gear, non, hence if synthol makes behemoth arms so would site injecting if done often enough with the same amount.

So why do we not see synthol like arms on people who site inject because unlike the synthol freaks they are not doing 15cc of gear in each bicep daily.

My point is oil from synthol does not necessarily tear a muscle so why would oil from gear do that?..

As for Arnold, I doubt it, like jude said, frequent injection in the biceps would cause bruises on a regular basis and Arnold always had his shirt off.
i meant steroid injections


synthol injections dont enter my wildest imagination

a travesty it is
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: shrek on November 08, 2013, 10:53:46 AM
Yeah I only get bruising when I ht a shallow vein or a sloppy injection or a twitch...... and now that I started the calces again they twitch on me and cause bruises
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: local hero on November 09, 2013, 01:26:45 AM
arnie had those arms as a naive dianabol swallowing teen in austria.... he had the chest too, so i suppose by this reckoning he was shooting his chest too?

i looked into the synthol thing a lot a few years back before i stopped competing, and there is a big difference between the oils, synthol is full of collegen and is much thicker, it stays in the muscle far longer before it breaks down, which in turn blows the muscle up

 
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: thebrink on November 10, 2013, 04:16:29 PM
none.

those were legit arms

what is this, jsut bc they were big there must be some trick?



this
Title: Re: how much of arnolds arm size was related to site injects?
Post by: POB on November 16, 2013, 02:15:21 PM
Used an arm blaster when curling 8)