Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Alex23 on December 12, 2013, 11:07:21 PM
-
Once again science prevails. 8)
-
MythBusted by Nerds. 8)
-
I have personally met the engineer who designed the telecom system that linked the video to Earth and converted the standards to NTSC and PAL.
-
The story about how the moon hoax was made is symbolically encoded in "The Shinning". Look it up on youtube
-
The story about how the moon hoax was made is symbolically encoded in "The Shinning". Look it up on youtube
So whats your take on the moon landing have humans walked there before?
-
So whats your take on the moon landing have humans walked there before?
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
That is actually worth some thought, could this explain UFO sightings why would not life forms there want to come and explore the earth. NASA has many secrets I think not given out to the public in fear of people freaking out.
-
:D
-
Once again science prevails. 8)
Jruth would like to land on Uranis.
-
Jruth would like to land on Uranis.
;D
juruth makes elton blush
-
The moon landings were obviously faked. Best of all, it worked so well they actually faked it six times. Those sneaky NASA/Hollywood bastards.
* Apollo 11 - landed 20 July, 1969
* Apollo 12 - landed 19 November, 1969
* Apollo 14 - landed 5 February, 1971
* Apollo 15 - landed 30 July, 1971
* Apollo 16 - landed 20 April, 1972
* Apollo 17 - landed 11 December, 1972
-
Once again science prevails. 8)
hahaha fucker you are back from timeout, you tried to outmass the pros but your dick is not bigger than the clit of the female pros.
-
The moon landings were obviously faked. Best of all, it worked so well they actually faked it six times. Those sneaky NASA/Hollywood bastards.
* Apollo 11 - landed 20 July, 1969
* Apollo 12 - landed 19 November, 1969
* Apollo 14 - landed 5 February, 1971
* Apollo 15 - landed 30 July, 1971
* Apollo 16 - landed 20 April, 1972
* Apollo 17 - landed 11 December, 1972
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
Oh brother ::)
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
The moon actually does rotate as it orbits earth. It rotates on its axis by one full rotation for each rotation it makes around the earth. If the moon didn't rotate on its axis as it circled the earth, then we would be able to see all sides of the moon, which we know we cannot.
Try out this little experiment for yourself to satisfy your curisity. Take two tennis balls. Then, rotate one around the other. The only way for the rotating tennis ball to keep the same face against the stationary ball is for the rotating ball to actually rotate on its own axis - precisely one axial rotation for every rotation around the stationary ball.
Now, do it again. But this time, using the rotating ball, don't allow it to rotate on it's axis. Take a pen and put a little dot on the rotating ball. Now, have that pen dot face you the entire time you rotate the ball around the stationary ball. You'll see that, behold, the stationary ball gets to see all "sides" (if you will pardon the geometrical faux pas) of the rotating ball.
And since we know we only see one "side" (again, haha!) of the moon, we therefore know that the moon must in fact rotate on its own axis. Precisely once per rotation around the earth.
And now, this nerd is shutting down for a beer.
For what it's worth, I'm still a big Sev fan!
-
we landed on the moon?
-
we landed on the moon?
;D
-
???
-
That video is so full of shit. The window represent 3M which is sticky material??? WHat the fuck! There are two poles in a scene with other poles but 2 of them make an 11. There is an upside triangle. Like an A for Apollo. hahahaha. Fuck. The best is the window will represents a stage where Apollo 11 was staged.
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
What the fuck? Are you, Wiggs and all the other nutjobs getting together to sniff gasoline and paint thinner before going out to hunt for toads to lick? I mean seriously...
-
What the fuck? Are you, Wiggs and all the other nutjobs getting together to sniff gasoline and paint thinner before going out to hunt for toads to lick? I mean seriously...
People who believes in this crap are borderlining mental discapacities, altought in Wiggs' case I think the main problem is rec drugs and some kind of emotional distress.
-
The story about how the moon hoax was made is symbolically encoded in "The Shinning". Look it up on youtube
I saw a great documentary on Netflix claiming Stanley Kubrick told his story about making the fake footage in the Shining. That he used the same techniques from 2001.
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
LOL, a secret space program that allow us to travel around galaxies while NASA has to fake a moon landing. Wouldn't be easier then to just go to the fucking moon? ::)
-
The moon actually does rotate as it orbits earth. It rotates on its axis by one full rotation for each rotation it makes around the earth. If the moon didn't rotate on its axis as it circled the earth, then we would be able to see all sides of the moon, which we know we cannot.
Try out this little experiment for yourself to satisfy your curisity. Take two tennis balls. Then, rotate one around the other. The only way for the rotating tennis ball to keep the same face against the stationary ball is for the rotating ball to actually rotate on its own axis - precisely one axial rotation for every rotation around the stationary ball.
Now, do it again. But this time, using the rotating ball, don't allow it to rotate on it's axis. Take a pen and put a little dot on the rotating ball. Now, have that pen dot face you the entire time you rotate the ball around the stationary ball. You'll see that, behold, the stationary ball gets to see all "sides" (if you will pardon the geometrical faux pas) of the rotating ball.
And since we know we only see one "side" (again, haha!) of the moon, we therefore know that the moon must in fact rotate on its own axis. Precisely once per rotation around the earth.
And now, this nerd is shutting down for a beer.
For what it's worth, I'm still a big Sev fan!
I like when the nutjobs avoid serious responses.
-
lol.
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
Are there other goodies besides structures, bases, buildings? That sounds like boys' toys. What about the girls? Is your teddy bear on the "Dark Side", too?
First one to the Dark Side gets a Tootsie Roll!
-
I short,
The moon is not a natural satellite but a hollowed out planetoid driven in orbit 826.000 years ago when the Earth was first colonized. It stays in orbit like a ship, which it was, and that is why it does not spin around (the only "natural" object that defies cosmic laws ::) )
It has plenty of life, structures, bases, buildings etc that were used and still are. on the "Dark Side"
The NASA programs are just a show for public consumption. The real space pogram makes Star Wars kiddie play.
Nice Troll. Next thing you know you will be telling us a secret group of reptilian humanoids called the Babylonian Brotherhood controls humanity.
-
Yet you believe Sandy Hook was a hoax.
-
Once again science prevails. 8)
Sad thing is, that Dr Kaku could use his time to giving lectures to bunch of chimpanzees, and the apes would understand more than all the foil hat morons in the USA. I have no difficulties to believe his story about the moon rock he was studying, but in the other hand, is quite easy for the moron to say, "I do not believe this shit". Why don't he believe? Because he isn't smart enough to understand, he is a moron. This is the problem with all foil hats. They think they are smart, but that is plain and simple illusion, because in the real world they are idiots.
I am strong believer of the fact, that all the foil hats and doomsday preppers would in the closer examination reveal as an mentally ill bunch of idiots, because things they believe are so fucking far out from this world. Only completely insane or mentally ill mind could believe shit that is "common knowledge" to these morons, like Wiggs and his comets. He is referring to things which comes from the beliefs of people more than 400 years ago, before the witch hunts and inquisition of Rome. All the science starting from Galileo Galilei is just lies to him, at least he stupidly ignores all of it, so how he even could be sane? There have been hundred of billions of dollars put in the science all over the world, but he believe fairy tales coming from ancient history? That is beyond ridiculous, it is just pathetic.
-
The sad truth is that Wiggs and associates are not idiots, imbeciles or even morons. They are reasonably intelligent people who believe preposterous things. I have seen guys like this. They will argue all manner of things. New World Order. Conspiracies. Wiggs is doubly tainted because he has abandoned all rationality by embracing religion. So he rejects theories like evolution. Yeah, that is right a benevolent creator made ticks, flees, and all manner of awful things to punish us humans. He made women menstruate monthly. Nice creator, that!
-
Hey Vince, no sight of you at the Bondi beach ??, U should join us at North Bondi Outdor gym
doin' flags,chins,pulls........... :)
Reminder: you a getting into super shape 4 Bondi beach showing of , why not asking Paul Graham for advice
how to get into tip-top form ?.
-
The moon was once a planet called Theia. It collided with earth and the moon is what's left of the debris.
-
kaku has books to sell. And he s very good at talking about science and bordering sci fi most of the time. It sells his books.
-
Yet you believe Sandy Hook was a hoax.
not sure he means hoax, he implies a setup
-
Oh brother ::)
So Erich Von Daniken is not in charge of the Nasa :-\
-
I saw a great documentary on Netflix claiming Stanley Kubrick told his story about making the fake footage in the Shining. That he used the same techniques from 2001.
What was it called chief?
I watched Sev's and some off was kinda weak, but some of it was pretty damn convincing.
-
So Erich Von Daniken is not in charge of the Nasa :-\
witty and smart... I actually LOLed. ;D
-
Didn't convince me.
And no debunker wants to explain how the Astronauts could survive the trip through the Van Allen Radiation Belts and the cosmic radiation outside the Earth's Magnetosphere.
Also, there's evidence the "moon rocks" are meteors colected in Antarctica.
-
Didn't convince me.
Oh... well, if a prominent scientist such as yourself is not convinced, that gives us all pause.
And no debunker wants to explain how the Astronauts could survive the trip through the Van Allen Radiation Belts and the cosmic radiation outside the Earth's Magnetosphere.
Of course they don't want to explain it. Which is why an explanation isn't available on wikipedia, on a page conveniently labelled Moon landing conspiracy theories (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_hoax#Environment) which doesn't say the following:
There are two main Van Allen belts - the inner belt and the outer belt - and a transient third belt. The inner belt is the more dangerous one, containing energetic protons. The outer one has less-dangerous low-energy electrons (Beta particles). The Apollo spacecraft passed through the inner belt in a matter of minutes and the outer belt in about 1 1⁄2 hours. The astronauts were shielded from the ionizing radiation by the aluminum hulls of the spacecraft. Furthermore, the orbital transfer trajectory from Earth to the Moon through the belts was chosen to lessen radiation exposure. Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too harmful for the Apollo missions. Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years. The spacecraft passed through the intense inner belt and the low-energy outer belt. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year and not much more than what Space Shuttle astronauts received.
Or, to put it more bluntly, unless you know what you're talking about and are sure you aren't making shit up, sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up because we shouldn't have to be subjected to the sort of bullshit you spew.
Also, there's evidence the "moon rocks" are meteors colected in Antarctica.
Slightly more plausible than your bullshit about the Van Allen radiation belts, but still no good. Wikipedia explains why this "evidence" you cite not only isn't evidence but is well and thoroughly debunked.
-
What was it called chief?
I watched Sev's and some off was kinda weak, but some of it was pretty damn convincing.
room 237, aka two hours of utterly bullshit by morons who are on LSD-trip. According to "author", every second of movie "shining", has at least double meaning, of even triple or quarto meaning. There is no doubt that Kubric was a genius, but in the other hand, there is no doubt that those who are debugging his works to find some hidden messages, are insane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_237
-
room 237, aka two hours of utterly bullshit by morons who are on LSD-trip. According to "author", every second of movie "shining", has at least double meaning, of even triple or quarto meaning. There is no doubt that Kubric was a genius, but in the other hand, there is no doubt that those who are debugging his works to find some hidden messages, are insane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_237
The only room that's recognized on getbig is Room 7 at the Mirage, by the ice machine.
-
Would love to visit the moon and see for myself. Kaku-old seems strange, something's not kosher about him.
-
Sad thing is, that Dr Kaku could use his time to giving lectures to bunch of chimpanzees, and the apes would understand more than all the foil hat morons in the USA. I have no difficulties to believe his story about the moon rock he was studying, but in the other hand, is quite easy for the moron to say, "I do not believe this shit". Why don't he believe? Because he isn't smart enough to understand, he is a moron. This is the problem with all foil hats. They think they are smart, but that is plain and simple illusion, because in the real world they are idiots.
I am strong believer of the fact, that all the foil hats and doomsday preppers would in the closer examination reveal as an mentally ill bunch of idiots, because things they believe are so fucking far out from this world. Only completely insane or mentally ill mind could believe shit that is "common knowledge" to these morons, like Wiggs and his comets. He is referring to things which comes from the beliefs of people more than 400 years ago, before the witch hunts and inquisition of Rome. All the science starting from Galileo Galilei is just lies to him, at least he stupidly ignores all of it, so how he even could be sane? There have been hundred of billions of dollars put in the science all over the world, but he believe fairy tales coming from ancient history? That is beyond ridiculous, it is just pathetic.
Well said.
-
Well said.
Every Ache and Disappointment.
Every Pain and Tear in us.
Is the Dying of a World.
-
Every Ache and Disappointment.
Every Pain and Tear in us.
Is the Dying of a World.
Have you been licking your avatar? You know that's bad for you, right?
-
kaku has books to sell. And he s very good at talking about science and bordering sci fi most of the time. It sells his books.
agreed .. he does not say anything and talks quite a bit which I find fascinating ... much like you do ;D
-
Oh... well, if a prominent scientist such as yourself is not convinced, that gives us all pause.
Of course they don't want to explain it. Which is why an explanation isn't available on wikipedia, on a page conveniently labelled Moon landing conspiracy theories (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_hoax#Environment) which doesn't say the following:
Or, to put it more bluntly, unless you know what you're talking about and are sure you aren't making shit up, sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up because we shouldn't have to be subjected to the sort of bullshit you spew.
Slightly more plausible than your bullshit about the Van Allen radiation belts, but still no good. Wikipedia explains why this "evidence" you cite not only isn't evidence but is well and thoroughly debunked.
Well, i don't want to convince anyone of anything, i am just sharing my opinion. I think everybody should be a scientist in the sense of doing his/her own research and coming to a personal conclusion instead of blindly accepting the pre packaged official truth in any subject.
Also, i am not "making shit up", as the said "shit" is present in lots of documentaries available on youtube as evidence that was researched by others.
If someone wants to believe the official version, and that version sounds right to then, its OK by me.
For those who after watching both sides of the argument think there is lots of weird things and conflicting evidence going on, they have the right to be skeptical.
-
Well, i don't want to convince anyone of anything, i am just sharing my opinion. I think everybody should be a scientist in the sense of doing his/her own research and coming to a personal conclusion instead of blindly accepting the pre packaged official truth in any subject.
Also, i am not "making shit up", as the said "shit" is present in lots of documentaries available on youtube as evidence that was researched by others.
If someone wants to believe the official version, and that version sounds right to then, its OK by me.
For those who after watching both sides of the argument think there is lots of weird things and conflicting evidence going on, they have the right to be skeptical.
Everything you cited as evidence in support for your position has already been debunked and debunked quite thoroughly. A couple of minutes on Google would have told you that
So please, don't backpedal and adopt some "well, we should all be scientists" schtick and try to pretend you're rational and your positions are credible, supported by actual evidence or cannot be countered. You are a conspiracy theorist and a grade A nutjob.
-
Would love to visit the moon and see for myself. Kaku-old seems strange, something's not kosher about him.
He seems strange, because he has at least 150 IQ, while you got 75 points. Guy is a nuclear physicist, not little wanker, and he talks about things you have no means to comprehend, so that why he seem to be strange to your point of view.
-
witty and smart... I actually LOLed. ;D
me too..it was a funny fucking comment haha
other things on the moon
(http://tech.bemoor.com/tech/Ancient_SpaceshipScale_on_moon.jpg)
this is what the apollo mission found inside
a female alien . WYHI?
(http://www.viewzone2.com/MonaLisa11.gif)
-
me too..it was a funny fucking comment haha
other things on the moon
(http://tech.bemoor.com/tech/Ancient_SpaceshipScale_on_moon.jpg)
this is what the apollo mission found inside
a female alien . WYHI?
(http://www.viewzone2.com/MonaLisa11.gif)
why are the world governments trying to hide these discoveries?
-
me too..it was a funny fucking comment haha
other things on the moon
(http://tech.bemoor.com/tech/Ancient_SpaceshipScale_on_moon.jpg)
this is what the apollo mission found inside
a female alien . WYHI?
(http://www.viewzone2.com/MonaLisa11.gif)
http://www.galaxiki.org/web/main/_blog/all/the-apollo-20-alien-spaceship-hoax.shtml
-
http://www.galaxiki.org/web/main/_blog/all/the-apollo-20-alien-spaceship-hoax.shtml
;D
-
me too..it was a funny fucking comment haha
other things on the moon
(http://tech.bemoor.com/tech/Ancient_SpaceshipScale_on_moon.jpg)
this is what the apollo mission found inside
a female alien . WYHI?
(http://www.viewzone2.com/MonaLisa11.gif)
This simply proves what I say couple of messages earlier: stupidity isn't enough to cover everything, these guys has to be plain mad to believe all this crap without any doubts. Like always, you have some photo manipulation, crappy fake video with genuine foil hat morons crappy quality, and your head spin like yo yo. You need help, you are insane.
Let see couple of claims closer: There has been "top secret" Apollo 20 mission just for this. Top secret? The space ship is 363 feet/101 meters high and just first stage f the craft burns 4,700,000 pounds of propellant. How secret is that, while it will be visible at least 100 kilometers in every direction, it will be seen in telescopes, radars and every fucking equipment known to man, which are invented to study space. In the video command module is hovering around the "alien ship" like a helicopter, meaning that it has skills which doesn't include it's arsenal. In real life they would be able to hang above the "alien ship" without effort just by selecting the correct speed in orbit, like they did above Apollo landing site. Hanging on the orbit doesn't use propellant, but flying around like a helicopter would use it like mad, so they need to have endless source of fuel to do that? How this happen, while whole space program was one endless fight to exclude as much mass from the space ship as possible. As an idiot you probably doesn't know that main problem with saturnus rocket was lack of power, so they have to calculate every fucking gram many times over before adding it to payload. Knowing this, how come there was lots of extra propellant to fly all over the place? Furthermore, there is also original copies about the photo without any space ships, so which one are correct? Photos without aliens ship, or pictures with it. Regarding the fact that there isn't any fucking prove about aliens what so ever, take your pick.
-
Those are "Q Tips" on the face.
-
Will we be invaded by Spacegoats? :D
-
This is a half-smoked marijuana cigarette.