Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 20, 2014, 08:49:05 PM

Title: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 20, 2014, 08:49:05 PM
“Ted Nugent’s derogatory description of President Obama is offensive and has no place in politics. He should apologize,” the Kentucky Republican tweeted Thursday night.

Paul isn’t the only potential Republican presidential candidate to speak out about Nugent’s comments.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told CNN he disagreed with Nugent’s language but also didn’t rule out campaigning with him in the future.
“You’ve never heard me say such a thing and nor would I,” Cruz said. “I will note, there are reasons Ted Nugent - people listen to him, which is that he has been fighting passionately for Second Amendment rights.”

Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Thursday told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer he has a “problem with” the rocker’s strong language about the president.
“I got a problem calling the president a mongrel. … I do have a problem with that. That is an inappropriate thing to say,” he said.
Nugent has thrown his support behind Greg Abbott to succeed Perry as governor. The Republican would likely face Democrat Wendy Davis in the general election.

(http://images.politico.com/global/2014/02/20/140220_rand_paul_ted_nugent_aps_605.jpg)

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/rand-paul-ted-nugent-103753.html?hp=l6
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 20, 2014, 08:50:28 PM
Et quelle est ton opinion sur ces paroles si provoquantes et potentiellement explosive dans un pays avec des tensions raciales toujour en vigeur?
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: galeniko on February 20, 2014, 08:51:27 PM
first ammendment right fully executed


Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: The_Punisher on February 20, 2014, 08:55:14 PM
Ce pays ne changeras Jamais.......les tensions raciales existeront pour tous les temps
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: galeniko on February 20, 2014, 08:57:21 PM
Ce pays ne changeras Jamais.......les tensions raciales existeront pour tous les temps
i blame the oj case
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: The_Punisher on February 20, 2014, 09:03:20 PM
i blame the oj case


Nothing has healed since that case and it will be 20 years this upcoming June
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: snx on February 20, 2014, 09:07:20 PM
Et quelle est on opinion sur ces paroles si provoquantes et potentiellement explosive dans un pays avec des tensions raciales toujour en vigeur?

L'opinion? Il n'y a rien qui fait de bon sense. Pose tes questions ici, et tu vas souffrir les imbeciles. Bon appetit!
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 20, 2014, 09:13:44 PM
I'm not sure why Rand Paul feels the need to get involved.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: falco on February 21, 2014, 03:33:50 AM
Je ne compris pas, je ne parle pas français, mes amies.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Skorp1o on February 21, 2014, 03:38:49 AM

Un pays plein de PD
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Thick Nick on February 21, 2014, 03:47:27 AM
I'm trying to figure out what he said that was incorrect? I would called Obama worse... Like traitorous subhuman mongrel.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: _bruce_ on February 21, 2014, 04:15:21 AM
Theodor's a bit of an attention whore but he's right.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: muscleman-2013 on February 21, 2014, 05:52:52 AM
Obama should go to france.  Those stupid fagg0ts would love him.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 21, 2014, 10:56:27 AM
Et quelle est ton opinion sur ces paroles si provoquantes et potentiellement explosive dans un pays avec des tensions raciales toujour en vigeur?

Mon opinion... if you capitalize on using your ethnicity to get elected, expect a backlash.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 10:57:14 AM
Mon opinion... if you capitalize on using your ethnicity to get elected, expect a backlash.
he's about 6 years late though
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 02:26:57 PM
Theodor's a bit of an attention whore but he's right.

This^^
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Wez on February 21, 2014, 02:53:10 PM
Wang Dang Sweet Poontang!
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: the trainer on February 21, 2014, 02:57:52 PM
“Ted Nugent’s derogatory description of President Obama is offensive and has no place in politics. He should apologize,” the Kentucky Republican tweeted Thursday night.

Paul isn’t the only potential Republican presidential candidate to speak out about Nugent’s comments.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told CNN he disagreed with Nugent’s language but also didn’t rule out campaigning with him in the future.
“You’ve never heard me say such a thing and nor would I,” Cruz said. “I will note, there are reasons Ted Nugent - people listen to him, which is that he has been fighting passionately for Second Amendment rights.”

Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Thursday told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer he has a “problem with” the rocker’s strong language about the president.
“I got a problem calling the president a mongrel. … I do have a problem with that. That is an inappropriate thing to say,” he said.
Nugent has thrown his support behind Greg Abbott to succeed Perry as governor. The Republican would likely face Democrat Wendy Davis in the general election.

(http://images.politico.com/global/2014/02/20/140220_rand_paul_ted_nugent_aps_605.jpg)

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/rand-paul-ted-nugent-103753.html?hp=l6

Benny b are you back  :D
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: galeniko on February 21, 2014, 03:16:13 PM
shouldnt have called him mongrel,only subhumane ;D

or vice versa, but this racist twaat went for the double whooper
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 03:17:34 PM
shouldnt have called him mongrel,only subhumane ;D

or vice versa, but this racist twaat went for the double whooper

ROFL
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Mr Anabolic on February 21, 2014, 03:22:54 PM
Awwww... sensitive little PC idiots get offended by free speech?

Fuck them.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: DanielPaul on February 21, 2014, 04:35:55 PM
I'm not sure why Rand Paul feels the need to get involved.
they asked his opinion dick
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Fortress on February 21, 2014, 04:37:21 PM
The man can call anyone anything he wants to.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 04:38:14 PM
they asked his opinion dick

I like Rand Paul asshole

Just saying Ted Nugent can say whatever he wants and it might not be beneficial for Rand to even acknowledge it.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: nicorulez on February 21, 2014, 05:45:41 PM
He is only saying what 99% of us Getbiggers think. Obama is the antithesis of American. He is an avowed communist who caters to non-working and lazy to get his agenda passed. Unfortunately, Americans have gotten so lazy or ignorant that they voted for this clown in 2012. The continued degradation of
America with more welfare, entitlement, and laziness. Sad to be an American nowadays. :'( :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: oldtimer1 on February 21, 2014, 06:47:49 PM
He is only saying what 99% of us Getbiggers think. Obama is the antithesis of American. He is an avowed communist who caters to non-working and lazy to get his agenda passed. Unfortunately, Americans have gotten so lazy or ignorant that they voted for this clown in 2012. The continued degradation of
America with more welfare, entitlement, and laziness. Sad to be an American nowadays. :'( :'( :'( :'(

So true. He's the worse thing that could have happened to America.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: DanielPaul on February 21, 2014, 06:54:47 PM
I like Rand Paul asshole

Just saying Ted Nugent can say whatever he wants and it might not be beneficial for Rand to even acknowledge it.
oh ok
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 21, 2014, 08:35:54 PM
he's about 6 years late though

Timing is not an issue here; the build up of socialism bullying is has hit the fan. Obama has shit on his face. Hard to tell but he does.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 08:37:18 PM
Timing is not an issue here; the build up of socialism bullying is has hit the fan. Obama has shit on his face. Hard to tell but he does.
Tell me more about how you're a machine in Chicago. Are you a consultant or specialized worker of some sort?
sounds like they import you for your expertise or knowledge of the inner workings of your industry
just curious
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 21, 2014, 08:54:04 PM
Tell me more about how you're a machine in Chicago. Are you a consultant or specialized worker of some sort?
sounds like they import you for your expertise or knowledge of the inner workings of your industry
just curious

I'm a machine wherever I am. Yes I am a consultant spreading his knowledge wherever it is needed. Mon pied-d'à-terre varies depending where I'm needed. I'm in America until April so flying back and forward to our west coast home. What is your question again?
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 08:55:26 PM
I'm a machine wherever I am. Yes I am a consultant spreading his knowledge wherever it is needed. Mon pied-d'à-terre varies depending where I'm needed. I'm in America until April so flying back and forward to our west coast home. What is your question again?
The industry you work in. I was assuming IT based on your thread the other day. Perhaps management consultancy?
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Coach is Back! on February 21, 2014, 08:56:26 PM
That's nothing compared to what the left has said about Bush, Palin and anyone else on the right. Fuck Obama.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 08:58:20 PM
Is it un PC to refer to someone who is biracial as a mongrel?

Serious q
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 08:59:03 PM
That's nothing compared to what the left has said about Bush, Palin and anyone else on the right. Fuck Obama.
Technically they also started two wars that the country couldn't afford, and mortgaged payments on the staggering $15 trillion debt in so doing
but yeah, Obama's no saint
though he has attempted to forcefeed the American people a minimum standard most countries in the West take for granted, namely affordable health care
something apparently they don't want
guess being uninsured and getting a $10K hospital bill is better
all part the American psyche I guess, independence of any outside help seems to be an inalienable ethos branded into their brains
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 21, 2014, 09:01:21 PM
That's nothing compared to what the left has said about Bush, Palin and anyone else on the right. Fuck Obama.

The irony... I remember being in San Francisco when GWB was re-elected in 2004. Weak minded San franciscans were literally crying and threatening to move to Canada. The viciousness of the conformity enforcement from the left is destroying this great Republic. Don't let them do it.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 09:09:59 PM
Technically they also started two wars that the country couldn't afford, and mortgaged payments on the staggering $15 trillion debt in so doing
but yeah, Obama's no saint
though he has attempted to forcefeed the American people a minimum standard most countries in the West take for granted, namely affordable health care
something apparently they don't want
guess being uninsured and getting a $10K hospital bill is better
all part the American psyche I guess, independence of any outside help seems to be an inalienable ethos branded into their brains

We can afford the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan easily, and the stratigraphic positioning in the region is well worth it. Although if it were up to me we wouldn't play world police while Canadians and Europeans sit back and reap the benefits (at our expense) while complaining like little girls.

As far as healthcare goes, he's clearly made the situation worse as predicted.

(http://www.rightchange.com/images/sized/images/buttons/RC-blog-debt-added-649x376.jpg)
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Coach is Back! on February 21, 2014, 09:10:53 PM
Technically they also started two wars that the country couldn't afford, and mortgaged payments on the staggering $15 trillion debt in so doing
but yeah, Obama's no saint
though he has attempted to forcefeed the American people a minimum standard most countries in the West take for granted, namely affordable health care
something apparently they don't want
guess being uninsured and getting a $10K hospital bill is better
all part the American psyche I guess, independence of any outside help seems to be an inalienable ethos branded into their brains

Obama surpassed all of those numbers in his first term. $8Trillion in 8 years compared to an additional $9 trillion with in 6 years with three years to go. We're fucked.

Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 09:11:50 PM
The irony... I remember being in San Francisco when GWB was re-elected in 2004. Weak minded San franciscans were literally crying and threatening to move to Canada. The viciousness of the conformity enforcement from the left is destroying this great Republic. Don't let them do it.

I never thought I would say it, but I miss George and Dick.

 :(
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 09:12:10 PM
If they can afford the wars, why did they almost default on the debt ceiling 5 months ago?
why is social security going to run out in about 30 years?
why are half the government service office wickets closed leading to endless lineups for basic things like welfare payments?
lol
america's broke
china and japan own its debt in bonds
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 21, 2014, 09:14:07 PM
We can afford the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan easily, and he stratigraphic positioning in the region is well worth it. Although if it were up to me we wouldn't play world police while Canadians and Europeans sit back and reap the benefits (at our expense) while complaining like little girls.

As far as healthcare goes, he's clearly made the situation worse as predicted.

(http://www.rightchange.com/images/sized/images/buttons/RC-blog-debt-added-649x376.jpg)

but.... no one should be left behind.... Hope and Change?  :-\
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 09:15:23 PM
If they can afford the wars, why did they almost default on the debt ceiling 5 months ago?
why is social security going to run out in about 30 years?
why are half the government service office wickets closed leading to endless lineups for basic things like welfare payments?
lol
america's broke
china and japan own its debt in bonds

I don't think you realize what "default" means in the context. It wasn't that we couldn't pay, big government is holding us hostage, and the debt ceiling was a bargaining tool to try and cut spending.

Social security was a ponzi scheme from the very beginning, it could never sustain itself and should have never been passed.

The US deficit is decreasing, although I agree that it isn't good enough. We need massive cuts, the Federal Government is way to big.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 09:18:41 PM
I don't think you realize what "default" means in the context.

Social security was a ponzi scheme from the very beginning, it could never sustain itself and should have never been passed.

The US deficit is dropping, although I agree that it isn't good enough. We need massive cuts, the Federal Government is way to big.
It's not dropping at all. It's set to rise astronomically in the next 10 years.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/)
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 09:46:28 PM
It's not dropping at all. It's set to rise astronomically in the next 10 years.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/)


deficit/debt
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 09:47:18 PM
deficit/debt
Debt is the cumulative total of deficits over the years, bub.

Educated yourself.

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/news/pressroom/pressroom_bpd08052004.htm (http://www.treasurydirect.gov/news/pressroom/pressroom_bpd08052004.htm)
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 10:43:53 PM
Debt is the cumulative total of deficits over the years, bub.

Educated yourself.

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/news/pressroom/pressroom_bpd08052004.htm (http://www.treasurydirect.gov/news/pressroom/pressroom_bpd08052004.htm)

I said the deficit is shrinking, and you responded with an article about the debt.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 10:44:50 PM
I said the deficit is shrinking, and you responded with an article about the debt.
The country's had deficits for all but 4 years since 1970. Feel free to look that up. That doesn't reduce debt at all, and is therefore a nonsequitur.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 10:49:52 PM
The US deficit is decreasing
It's not dropping at all. It's set to rise astronomically in the next 10 years.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/)


Deficit in U.S. Shrinks Oct.-Jan. on Rise in Revenue
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-12/budget-deficit-in-u-s-shrinks-oct-jan-on-8-2-rise-in-revenue.html
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 10:52:49 PM
Deficit in U.S. Shrinks Oct.-Jan. on Rise in Revenue
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-12/budget-deficit-in-u-s-shrinks-oct-jan-on-8-2-rise-in-revenue.html
it's been shrinking and expanding for 40 years, genius
that doesn't mean it isn't going to stay in the red, unless it's completely balanced
a balanced budget hasn't existed in decades
wake up and smell reality
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 10:53:36 PM
it's been shrinking and expanding for 40 years, genius
that doesn't mean it isn't going to stay in the red, unless it's completely balanced
a balanced budget hasn't existed in decades
wake up and smell reality

The US deficit is decreasing
It's not dropping at all. It's set to rise astronomically in the next 10 years.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmcsherry/2013/10/13/week-ahead-what-if-16-7-trillion-debt-climbs-to-25-trillion/)


Deficit in U.S. Shrinks Oct.-Jan. on Rise in Revenue
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-12/budget-deficit-in-u-s-shrinks-oct-jan-on-8-2-rise-in-revenue.html
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 21, 2014, 10:54:33 PM
why the double post
the first one was enough
I get it, you know how to google
so do I
the deficit shouldnt exist at all
and it's Bush Jr that ran some of the biggest ever
like it or not, Obama's just continuing that trend
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 21, 2014, 10:55:16 PM
it's Bush Jr that ran some of the biggest ever
like it or not, Obama's just continuing that trend

(http://www.rightchange.com/images/sized/images/buttons/RC-blog-debt-added-649x376.jpg)
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: dario73 on February 22, 2014, 07:40:54 AM
Deficit in U.S. Shrinks Oct.-Jan. on Rise in Revenue
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-12/budget-deficit-in-u-s-shrinks-oct-jan-on-8-2-rise-in-revenue.html

It decreased from what Obama spent in his first 4 years.

So we should thank him for spending $1 trillion a year and bringing that now to $600 billion a year?

At 500 to 600 billion a year, he is still spending more annually than any other president.

And now he has proposed another spending plan that will another $56 billion to the deficit.

Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: rachaelsnav on February 22, 2014, 10:14:40 AM
i find the following much more offensive than Ted Nugents free speech

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/americas-fundamental-transformation-under-obama/

And lets not forget the following greatness from MSNBC which the no democrat elected official felt the need to apologize over

http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/31/msnbcs-top-offensive-moments/

Oh and Obama's mentor he never said anything offensive.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/18/barackobama.uselections20083

Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Voici Le Rédempteur on February 22, 2014, 11:43:30 AM
Pre-Election:
Obama is a Messiah of Hope and Change, the most charismatic man since Jesus Christ.

Post-Election:
The most inefficient Manager this country has ever seen, bullies his way, promotes spying on its citizens, stages getting Osama (and takes the credit). Most uncharismatic Quadroon even seen.
Title: Re: “subhuman mongrel”?
Post by: Icelord on February 22, 2014, 11:45:13 AM
Pre-Election:
Obama is a Messiah of Hope and Change, the most charismatic man since Jesus Christ.

Post-Election:
The most inefficient Manager this country has ever seen, bullies his way, promotes spying on its citizens, stages getting Osama (and takes the credit). Most uncharismatic Quadroon even seen.
Because:

Pre-Election: Can say and promise whatever one wants
Post-Election: Has to try to pass legislation (blood) through a clogged artery (congress) and kowtow to the corporations that own it (life support). It's a miracle he's even done what he did, good or bad. Trying to manage the US is like trying to do backstrokes in mud.