Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => UK Getbig Bodybuilding and More => Topic started by: anabolichalo on August 31, 2014, 03:37:44 AM

Title: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: anabolichalo on August 31, 2014, 03:37:44 AM
Is there really a huge difference in reality?

Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: bigmc on September 01, 2014, 12:21:19 AM
a lot of people swear by fasted cardio

i used to run before breakfast


not sure of the benefits but it really set you up for the day energy wise
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: booty on September 01, 2014, 12:48:05 AM
a lot of people swear by fasted cardio

i used to run before breakfast


not sure of the benefits but it really set you up for the day energy wise
bumps up the metabolic rate for the whole day too.
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: Skorp1o on September 01, 2014, 01:08:05 AM
Fasted cardio is same as any cardio when body is running on empty. Makes sense logically, If I had the time I'd do it a lot more often.
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: anabolichalo on September 01, 2014, 02:02:54 AM
what pisses me off

the last at least 10 years "science based" gurus are trying to convince the public that "high intensity interval" cardio is best, because it increases metabolic rate for the rest of the day


yet the pros are all doing low intensity cardio


and for good reason if you ask me, low intensity cardio is where the health benefits lie, is it not true?

if you're going to do "HIIT" cardio might as well do circuit training on the weights


wtf is this shit they are trying to shove down our throat HIIT this HIIT that

fucking PISSES ME OFFFF
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: BigRo on September 01, 2014, 03:16:24 AM
yes that annoys me too.
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: BigCyp on September 01, 2014, 03:34:16 AM
what pisses me off

the last at least 10 years "science based" gurus are trying to convince the public that "high intensity interval" cardio is best, because it increases metabolic rate for the rest of the day


yet the pros are all doing low intensity cardio


and for good reason if you ask me, low intensity cardio is where the health benefits lie, is it not true?

if you're going to do "HIIT" cardio might as well do circuit training on the weights


wtf is this shit they are trying to shove down our throat HIIT this HIIT that

fucking PISSES ME OFFFF

I'd imagine, that scientific proofs aside, most professional bodybuilders would avoid high intensity cardio as they're carrying too much size.

Low intensity = effective, safer for the big guys.
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: anabolichalo on September 01, 2014, 04:26:37 AM
I'd imagine, that scientific proofs aside, most professional bodybuilders would avoid high intensity cardio as they're carrying too much size.

Low intensity = effective, safer for the big guys.

low intensity cardio helps diminish the long teerm effects of adrenaline (associated with high intensity training) on the heart


at least a bro scientist on the internet claimed so
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: local hero on September 01, 2014, 07:53:40 AM
I could never get away with low low intensity cardio, id have to make it difficult as id be too bored to be able to keep on it...

Fasted works much better from my experience, but any is better than none if course..

My approach to this is to have a mix if the 2.. If I do 30 mins I'll do a full out sprint for 45 secs, every 5 mins, or id increase the level every 5 mins etc etc
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: Teutonic Knight on September 01, 2014, 03:51:47 PM
what pisses me off

the last at least 10 years "science based" gurus are trying to convince the public that "high intensity interval" cardio is best, because it increases metabolic rate for the rest of the day


yet the pros are all doing low intensity cardio


and for good reason if you ask me, low intensity cardio is where the health benefits lie, is it not true?

if you're going to do "HIIT" cardio might as well do circuit training on the weights


wtf is this shit they are trying to shove down our throat HIIT this HIIT that

fucking PISSES ME OFFFF

Koln Sport University is only 3 hours away from yours "Havana",  :)
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: anabolichalo on September 02, 2014, 08:09:25 AM
this morning 40 minutes incline walking

getting shredded
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: Simple Simon on September 02, 2014, 08:24:53 AM
this morning 40 minutes incline walking

getting shredded

Fucking awesome.
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: anabolichalo on September 02, 2014, 08:25:36 AM
Fucking awesome.

 :D

now very soon i get mine shiny mercedes and the world will be mine
Title: Re: fasted cardio VS cardio after a meal - difference in fat burning effect?
Post by: Teutonic Knight on September 03, 2014, 02:23:26 PM
Is there really a huge difference in reality?



Yeah,  ;)

Just like € 5000 classy Belgian escort & € 30 "fine" Africana  :D