Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: tonymctones on September 29, 2014, 08:02:07 PM
-
http://news.yahoo.com/3-times-obama-administration-warned-isis-threat-192100956.html
Looks like the intelligence community wasnt the problem here afterall....
In his "60 Minutes" interview, President Obama seemed to put the blame on the intelligence community, saying, “I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.”
But for nearly a year, senior officials in the U.S. government have been warning about the alarming rise of ISIS, or ISIL as the terrorist group is also known, and the inability of the Iraqi government to confront the threat.
Here are three examples:
BRETT MCGURK
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Iraq and Iran
On Nov. 14, 2013, State Department official Brett McGurk testified before a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee extensively about the growing threat of ISIL/ISIS.
“We face a real problem,” McGurk said. “There is no question that ISIL is growing roots in Syria and in Iraq.”
McGurk was quite specific about the extent of the threat. He cited the group’s alarming campaign of suicide bombings, its growing financial resources and its expanding safe haven in Syria.
“We have seen upwards of 40 suicide bombers per month targeting playgrounds, mosques, and markets, in addition to government sites from Basra to Baghdad to Erbil,” he said.
He was also specific about the inability of the Iraqi government to deal with it.
“AQ/ISIL has benefited from a permissive operating environment due to inherent weaknesses of Iraqi security forces, poor operational tactics, and popular grievances, which remain unaddressed, among the population in Anbar and Nineva provinces.”
ROBERT BEECROFT
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq
In January, ISIS/ISIL gave a strong indication of just how much of a threat they posed when the group took over the Iraqi city of Fallujah and part of Ramadi. At that point, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Robert Beecroft said it could get a whole lot worse.
“It's a very precarious situation,” Beercroft told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz. “And a misstep anywhere could set off a larger conflict in the country.”
Lt. Gen. MICHAEL FLYNN
U.S. Army Director, Defense Intelligence Agency
On Feb. 11, 2014, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, warned the group would likely attempt to take over even more territory.
“ISIL probably will attempt to take territory in Iraq and Syria to exhibit its strength in 2014, as demonstrated recently in Ramadi and Fallujah, and the group’s ability to concurrently maintain multiple safe havens in Syria,” Flynn told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
That’s a prediction, unfortunately, that proved to be right on target.
-
Good grief. You know, this actually might be news to the president given that he skips intelligence briefings and is so disengaged. :-\
-
Where is 240 with the excuses?
-
Where is 240 with the excuses?
had the repubs possessed the fcking balls to IMPEACH OBAMA months ago, when public support was high and the F&F/Benghazi smoking guns were sitting there, then we woudln't be talking about obama's inability to stop ISIS.
You OWN everything obama does now. EVERYONE that was against impeachment, this is your shit pile now. You wanted this beccause, "hey, we might win some more seats in 2014 ,I heard it on Rush".
If 240 had his way, obama would be out of office right now.
But coach, rush, reince priebus had their way, and he's still in office, still ignoring important details like the growth of ISIS.
So before you ask 240 to excuse this inexcusable behavior by Obama, you might want to see which of us wanted obama impeached. And which one of us traded justice for possible political gain. I said it back then, you OWN everyhing bullshit move obama does now. For the next 28 months. You wanted him, you got him.
-
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/29/Report-Obama-Has-Missed-Over-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings
Typical of a lazy drug addicted punk ass
-
had the repubs possessed the fcking balls to IMPEACH OBAMA months ago, when public support was high and the F&F/Benghazi smoking guns were sitting there, then we woudln't be talking about obama's inability to stop ISIS.
You OWN everything obama does now. EVERYONE that was against impeachment, this is your shit pile now. You wanted this beccause, "hey, we might win some more seats in 2014 ,I heard it on Rush".
If 240 had his way, obama would be out of office right now.
But coach, rush, reince priebus had their way, and he's still in office, still ignoring important details like the growth of ISIS.
So before you ask 240 to excuse this inexcusable behavior by Obamaed, you might want to see which of us wanted obama impeached. And which one of us traded justice for possible political gain. I said it back then, you OWN everyhing bullshit move obama does now. For the next 28 months. You wanted him, you got him.
Repeating myself is useless. You fucked up 6 years ago when you voted for him (twice) and even though warned, didn't bother to listen. Your sarcastic spin posts are getting ridiculous. Why did you vote for him in the first place?
-
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/09/29/karl_vs_earnest_how_can_obama_say_underestimating_isis_was_an_intelligence_failure_when_he_was_warned.html
-
I don't think Obama is a drooling retard. The conclusion I've come to is he's just not very knowledgeable or interested in foreign policy and neither are the people around him. Mentioning Ferguson at the UN reveals the issues most important to Obama.
-
had the repubs possessed the fcking balls to IMPEACH OBAMA months ago, when public support was high and the F&F/Benghazi smoking guns were sitting there, then we woudln't be talking about obama's inability to stop ISIS.
You OWN everything obama does now. EVERYONE that was against impeachment, this is your shit pile now. You wanted this beccause, "hey, we might win some more seats in 2014 ,I heard it on Rush".
If 240 had his way, obama would be out of office right now.
But coach, rush, reince priebus had their way, and he's still in office, still ignoring important details like the growth of ISIS.
So before you ask 240 to excuse this inexcusable behavior by Obama, you might want to see which of us wanted obama impeached. And which one of us traded justice for possible political gain. I said it back then, you OWN everyhing bullshit move obama does now. For the next 28 months. You wanted him, you got him.
What was that statement you made on GetBig after Obama won the first time? Was it: "We changed the World!!"?
-
What was that statement you made on GetBig after Obama won the first time? Was it: "We changed the World!!"?
sounds about right
-
Unamed Pentagon Official: The President is lying to America
The Daily Caller ^ | 10-1-14 | "Joseph Miller"
Posted on 10/1/2014 8:27:03 AM by afraidfortherepublic
Joseph Miller is the pen name for a ranking Department of Defense official with a background in U.S. special operations and combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has worked in strategic planning.
President Barack Obama has taken a lot of flack since his Sunday night “60 Minutes” interview, in which he blamed the intelligence community for his failure to tackle the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. And that is right and proper. Because not only was his excuse of blaming us a lie, but when questioned on his lie, White House press secretary Josh Earnest doubled down with a whole new lie — both of which are easily, publicly proven false.
On Sunday, Obama said the intelligence community had underestimated the rise of ISIS, saying in an interview with CBS, “Our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that, I think, they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.”
But we know that isn’t true, as nearly a dozen administration officials have testified to the threat posed by ISIS publicly over the last year.
The fact that the president chose to use the word “they” instead of “we” immediately drew condemnation from friend and foe alike, who saw it as the president’s attempt to pass the buck. (RELATED: Obama Has Spent More Time Playing Golf Than In Intel Briefings)
To mitigate the fallout, Earnest’s office issued a statement stating that, “…A lot of that [decision-making] was predicated on the will of the Iraqi security forces to fight for their country.”
But this was also not true.
In 2010, General Lloyd Austin, then-commander of United State Forces in Iraq, directly informed the president that over 20,000 U.S. troops would be required to maintain the gains made by U.S. forces against al-Qaida and its affiliates, and to mentor the fledgling Iraqi security forces– because he knew they were not ready to go out on their own. (MILLER: The Facts Are In, And Obama’s Policy Is A Direct Danger To The United States)
But in order for Austin’s plan to work, the United States would have to negotiate and sign a security agreement with the government of Iraq to give the U.S. legal authority to keep U.S. military forces in that country beyond December 2010. The White House claims they were forced to withdraw because then-Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki refused to grant U.S. force serving in Iraq post 2010 immunity from Iraqi prosecution– a prerequisite for the presence of U.S. forces anywhere else in the world. But the administration made no attempt to seriously negotiate an agreement with the Iraqis, and cited our withdrawal from Iraq as a major achievement during the 2012 elections, giving the American intelligence community the distinct feeling that the move was politically motivated. (MILLER: Obama’s Current Strategy Is Doomed To Fail)
Instead of investing any time in negotiating the agreement, the Obama administration used the Maliki regimes refusal to grant immunity as a political out for withdrawing all U.S. combat forces from Iraq by the end of 2010. That saw the immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces and the end of Operation New Dawn, the successor to Operation Iraqi Freedom. It also saw the rise of ISIS, and brings us to where we are today. (MILLER: What It Will Take To Win The War Against The Islamic State)
Today, Gen. Lloyd Austin is in command of U.S. Central Command– the U.S. combatant command in charge of fighting all wars in the Middle East, Central Asia and parts of North and East Africa. From that post, he once again recommended to the president that ground forces would be required in order to achieve the White House’s goals, this time against ISIS in Syria and Iraq. (MILLER: Iraq A Symptom Of Larger Obama Failure — Syria)
Once again, the president overruled his commanding general and has chosen to use air strikes alone to “destroy” a terrorist army of 30,000.
The president clearly does not think the mission is worth the cost necessary to complete it; but by pursuing his ends without authorizing the necessary means, he is dooming that mission to failure. (MILLER: Special Forces, Not #Hashtags, Mr. President.
The United States military and intelligence community have learned a lot over the past decade of conflict. Our commander in chief, unfortunately, has not. Since the start of his administration, President Barack Obama has ignored his generals and the intelligence community. Over the past few weeks, he has half-heartedly pursued a strategy that destines us to fail in our mission, and over the past three days, he and his White House have lied to prove otherwise. To those who wear our nation’s uniform, or serve in her intelligence community, that’s insult — and injury.
-
Free Republic
Browse · Search Pings · Mail News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
The Ghost In The White House
Townhall.com ^ | 10-2-2014 | Derek Hunter
Posted on October 2, 2014 at 5:26:29 AM EDT by servo1969
There is a ghost in the White House, a spirit disconnected from this world, whisking from room to room, past staff, uninterested in their conversations. Unfortunately for us, the ghost is the president of the United States.
Barack Obama loves being president – the perks, the privilege, the pomp and circumstance. It’s the job that bores him. Unlike community organizing, the Illinois State Senate, or even the U.S. Senate, there’s only one president. They can’t just show up when they want or bleed into the background when they’d rather be doing other things.
President Obama loves the campaign trail. He performs a substance-free partisan attack speech written by snarky young staffers better than any recent occupant of the Oval Office. But those speechwriters aren’t serious people. They’re smartasses better suited for Twitter, not the seat of power. As such, when it comes to serious issues of foreign policy, the speeches give us nothing but vacant platitudes when what we need is serious thoughtfulness.
Ask yourself this: Have you heard Barack Obama deliver a serious, substantive foreign policy speech? Not a recap of what is already known, but a practical speech laying out principles, practical goals and the means by which to achieve them? Obama’s “ISIS strategy” speech last month was devoid of anything, even inspiring words, beyond what anyone who’d read a couple of Associated Press stories on the subject could’ve written.
A president knowledgeable and interested in the job and the subject would recognize this and demand others, maybe adults, craft a speech designed to inform and rally the American people to his side. Obama’s failure to do so shows either he doesn’t know or he doesn’t care.
Not knowing or not caring was on full display on Sunday when President Obama sat down with Steve Croft of 60 Minutes. When he was asked how ISIS managed to control so much without his knowing, and was it a surprise to him, Obama gave a very “Obama” answer.
“Well, I think our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria,” he said.
Barack Obama didn’t fail; James Clapper and the intelligence community did.
But James Clapper didn’t call ISIS the “jayvee team” just nine months ago; Barack Obama did. That was the president acknowledging the existence of ISIS and the fact that they’d just captured the major Iraqi city of Fallujah. Between then and September, did President Obama not receive any follow-up briefings on their progress? Did he ask no questions on their advances and barbarism? Was he not informed they held westerners, including Americans, hostage?
We know that’s not true, because after the beheading of journalist James Foley, the White House leaked that Obama had authorized a rescue attempt, after dithering for months.
So what kind of surprise could ISIS have been to the president if in July he’d sent the military into Syria because they were threatening Americans? None, really.
On Monday, Jon Karl of ABC News asked about how Obama could have been surprised by ISIS when so many intelligence officers had made public statements about their growth and spread starting last November. He asked, “So these warnings that came, to the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, to Iraq, he made similar warnings on the news, DHS officials, did the president hear this, did he know? You mentioned Clapper, so we know he listened to Clapper, the head of the DNI. Did he know what these other top officials in his own administration were saying about the threat from ISIL, did he hear what I just read to you?”
Josh Earnest, White House press secretary, responded, “I assume what you read to me was congressional testimony. There are a lot of public statements about this. I'm not going to get into what sort of private conversations the president had with his, with the intelligence community.”
So there were plenty of warnings, plenty of people in the intelligence community funneling information to the White House, and either the president knew and didn’t care, or he didn’t care to know.
The only other alternative is this information was not included in the President’s Daily Brief and James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, willfully withheld this important information from the president of the United States. In which case he should be fired immediately.
That not having happened, it leaves us only with the aforementioned “either/or” situation.
It’s been reported that Barack Obama had all this information and more in his Daily Brief for 18 months, including options for wiping out the leadership of both ISIS and the Khorasan group—all of which were rejected out of hand. That leaves only the “or”—that he doesn’t care. A case bolstered by his attending only 42 percent of his daily security briefings.
The ghost in the Oval Office will occupy that space until January 2017, but his failures as a leader and disinterest in leadership will haunt this country long after he departs.
TOPICS: Editorial; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: clapper; isil; isis; obama; scandals; Click to Add Keyword
-
The idiotintheovaloffice uses "we" to take credit for successes that were accomplished in spite of him, but uses "they" for every single one of his failures and to explain away his incompetence.
It must be Bush's fault.
-
bump
-
What was that statement you made on GetBig after Obama won the first time? Was it: "We changed the World!!"?
Did he really say that?
-
Did he really say that?
Yes he did
-
Yes he did
An Obama cheerleader from day one.
-
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/29/Report-Obama-Has-Missed-Over-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings
Typical of a lazy drug addicted punk ass
Thats a fucking disgrace >:(
Finally a valid argument. Good stuff SouC.
Is the source legit? What is Breibart's reputation?
-
typical towel headed muslim
-
SecDef nominee was getting grilled on ISIS, but what can really do? Only boots on the ground (IMO) can really eradicate these nuts and I don't think most people - conservative or liberal - has the stomach for that.
Lean on other Islamic nations or give them weapons may help, but even they don't always much care for us. It's not like Jordan has any love for us.
-
ISIS has claimed that ar-Raqqa in Syria is their capital.
Why don't we wipe that off the map. We didn't seem to have any qualms about civilian deaths in Japan and Germany during WWII.
I'm sure there are all kinds of political reasons why we can't do this but we really should just do it anyway.
The civilians in that town are already held hostage by these nuts (or actively support them) and I'm sure some would survive but ISIS would no longer have a capital
-
ISIS has claimed that ar-Raqqa in Syria is their capital.
Why don't we wipe that off the map. We didn't seem to have any qualms about civilian deaths in Japan and Germany during WWII.
I'm sure there are all kinds of political reasons why we can't do this but we really should just do it anyway.
The civilians in that town are already held hostage by these nuts and I'm sure some would survive but ISIS would no longer have a capital
Because obama protects his own. He's one of them.
-
Because obama protects his own. He's one of them.
And you're a certified moron
-
Because obama protects his own. He's one of them.
You don't support impeaching a member of ISIS (Obama).
Explain yourself - why would you support a terrorist running the USA?
-
And you're a certified moron
you're a certified twatwaffle
-
you're a certified twatwaffle
so I guess you believe that Obama considers ISIS to be "one of his own" too
-
And you're a certified moron
And you're a naive little man of you believe otherwise. How more fuckkng proof do you want ?
-
You don't support impeaching a member of ISIS (Obama).
Explain yourself - why would you support a terrorist running the USA?
Honestly Rob, shut the fuck up. Do you take anythjng seriously?
-
Honestly Rob, shut the fuck up. Do you take anythjng seriously?
no, I do take it seriously - and I was pissed when reagan fed the mujahadeen, clinton fed alquida, and buch/mccain fed the rebels in iraq and syria. And I'm very pissed about us still doing it.
Also, I'm very pissed about our govt not doing enough to waste these bad guys.
HOWEVER, I support impeachment (for fast and furious) because I believe obama broke laws and should no longer be president. I've been calling for impeachment since 2011. 333386 first sugggested it in 2010, and he is right.
I know, i know, Rush and fox radio said they were against it - but WHY? You have the senate now, you can win it. Popular opinion won't help obama - it'll plummet when we see the 200 bodies from fast and furious.
I guess what I'm saying it - How are YOU taking it seriously, when you refuse to support the ONE thing that can stop obama - IMPEACHMENT? I mean, it's a legal way to remove him. He's doing bad shit and will only get worse. WHy are you against impeachment/ It's baffling to me! And you get mad, tell me STFU...
but really - why are you against impeachment? It's the answer to the problem in this (and most) anti-obama threads.
-
And you're a naive little man of you believe otherwise. How more fuckkng proof do you want ?
Hey shorty, if you have proof that Obama is a member of ISIS then shouldn't you be contacting the FBI or something, maybe the CIA?
-
no, I do take it seriously - and I was pissed when reagan fed the mujahadeen, clinton fed alquida, and buch/mccain fed the rebels in iraq and syria. And I'm very pissed about us still doing it.
Also, I'm very pissed about our govt not doing enough to waste these bad guys.
HOWEVER, I support impeachment (for fast and furious) because I believe obama broke laws and should no longer be president. I've been calling for impeachment since 2011. 333386 first sugggested it in 2010, and he is right.
I know, i know, Rush and fox radio said they were against it - but WHY? You have the senate now, you can win it. Popular opinion won't help obama - it'll plummet when we see the 200 bodies from fast and furious.
I guess what I'm saying it - How are YOU taking it seriously, when you refuse to support the ONE thing that can stop obama - IMPEACHMENT? I mean, it's a legal way to remove him. He's doing bad shit and will only get worse. WHy are you against impeachment/ It's baffling to me! And you get mad, tell me STFU...
but really - why are you against impeachment? It's the answer to the problem in this (and most) anti-obama threads.
No, no you don't. At this point your purpose is to flat out fuckkng annoy. No if, ands or buts about it. I could probably go through at least 100 posts that parrot the same thing. You've ran out of your defence against obama so like a child, you repeat the same thing over and over again until someone gives you attention. I like you, but you've got past the point of being annoying.
-
Hey shorty, if you have proof that Obama is a member of ISIS then shouldn't you be contacting the FBI or something, maybe the CIA?
And then there's this idiot who takes being an idiot to different level. This asshole could kill a family member and you'd still defend him.
-
Hey shorty, if you have proof that Obama is a member of ISIS then shouldn't you be contacting the FBI or something, maybe the CIA?
I would bet my life right now that he's on someone's radar no matter what agency. That speech at the national prayer breakfast should have set off a whole shitload of bells and whistles.
-
I would bet my life right now that he's on someone's radar no matter what agency. That speech at the national prayer breakfast should have set off a whole shitload of bells and whistles.
LOL - it's a good think for you that you can't actually bet your life
I'm sure there are always bells and whistles and all kinds of other racket going off inside that empty skull of yours
-
LOL - it's a good think for you that you can't actually bet your life
I'm sure there are always bells and whistles and all kinds of other racket going off inside that empty skull of yours
Another terrorist sympathizer.
-
Another terrorist sympathizer.
great point genius
just a few posts up I said we should wipe off the map the city that they claim as their capital even though it would no doubt kill tens of thousands of civilians
do you have to get the moron certification renewed each year or is it a lifetime renewal ?
-
great point genius
just a few posts up I said we should wipe off the map the city that they claim as their capital even though it would no doubt kill tens of thousands of civilians
do you have to get the moron certification renewed each year or is it a lifetime renewal ?
You defend Obama. Obama defends terrorism = you a terrorist sympathizer.
-
You defend Obama. Obama defends terrorism = you a terrorist sympathizer.
Obama defends terrorism?
link please
-
Obama defends terrorism?
link please
www.foxnews.com
-
www.foxnews.com
don't troll man
I'm sure Joe truly believes his ridiculous statement and I'd like to know what he is basing it on
-
http://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2014/07/17/is-obama-waging-jihad-n1863378/page/full
This is from July. It's worse by 10fold today. But this won't help you or 240.
-
www.foxnews.com
Yeah, maybe Brian Wiiliams can shed some light on the subject ::)
-
http://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2014/07/17/is-obama-waging-jihad-n1863378/page/full
This is from July. It's worse by 10fold today. But this won't help you or 240.
you're simply providing the opinion of Wayne Allen Root
Why not just refer to your own opinion instead
I skimmed it and didn't find any facts of Obama "defending terrorism"
Can you just give me those specific facts and leave out the opinion of other nutbags
-
I would bet my life right now that he's on someone's radar no matter what agency. That speech at the national prayer breakfast should have set off a whole shitload of bells and whistles.
LOL love it ;D
The CIA and FBI is on Obama's sleeper muslim commie's ass.
Somehow they missed his background as a muslim spy communist when he was checked before his inaguration :D
-
you're simply providing the opinion of Wayne Allen Root
Why not just refer to your own opinion instead
I skimmed it and didn't find any facts of Obama "defending terrorism"
Can you just give me those specific facts and leave out the opinion of other nutbags
Do you really think I'm the only one who thinks this? What was stated in that article are facts. The only think that I disgree on in this article is that I don't think Obama is american born and far from it. Are you going to deny the fact that are in that article? You seriously don't think that he makes excuses for them? lol
-
Do you really think I'm the only one who thinks this? What was stated in that article are facts. The only think that I disgree on in this article is that I don't think Obama is american born and far from it. Are you going to deny the fact that are in that article? You seriously don't think that he makes excuses for them? lol
why do you think 100 morons or 1000 morons lends any credence to your idiotic beliefs
simply post the specific facts that prove that Obama defends terrorism
-
why do you think 100 morons or 1000 morons lends any credence to your idiotic beliefs
simply post the specific facts that prove that Obama defends terrorism
Again, you're a naive little man. Now refute what was stated in that article.
-
Again, you're a naive little man. Now refute what was stated in that article.
come on Coach
I don't know what part of the article you think supports your belief that Obama "defends terrorism".
just list those couple of parts of the article that you think most support your belief
-
come on Coach
I don't know what part of the article you think supports your belief that Obama "defends terrorism".
just list those couple of parts of the article that you think most support your belief
Funny. All of the sudden you're illiterate.
-
Funny. All of the sudden you're illiterate.
give me some specific parts of the article or even just forget that and tell me why you (as in YOU) have the belief that Obama "defends terrorism".
-
give me some specific parts of the article or even just forget that and tell me why you (as in YOU) have the belief that Obama "defends terrorism".
He has let out the worst of the worst terrorists who rejoined the fight against us.
-
Biggest diff btw the two obama haters (i hate him to) soul crusher and coach is that soul c is mostly trolling with many of his comments about obama but coach really believe what he is saying
-
Biggest diff btw the two obama haters (i hate him to) soul crusher and coach is that soul c is mostly trolling with many of his comments about obama but coach really believe what he is saying
soul crusher hates rinos. I think he'd rather fck a pencil sharpener than line up to vote Christie/Jeb in 2016.
Cruz or lose.
-
Biggest diff btw the two obama haters (i hate him to) soul crusher and coach is that soul c is mostly trolling with many of his comments about obama but coach really believe what he is saying
Obama is a muslim communist drug addicted down-lo incompetent pissed-on lover of terrorists pos.
-
Obama is a muslim communist drug addicted down-lo incompetent pissed-on lover of terrorists pos.
the other difference is that soul crusher would crawl thru 40 miles of broken glass to attend an obama impeachment hearing.
other repubs also believe obama is a foreign-born, terrist sympathizer, but are cool with him having another 49 weeks of executive power.
-
What is the problem w calling Obama a friend to terrorists? Everything this fng liar is about is to embolden these animals, make excuses for them, allow them room to operate and grow, etc.
He is a pos and should go live in Kenya where he belongs and came from
-
What is the problem w calling Obama a friend to terrorists? Everything this fng liar is about is to embolden these animals, make excuses for them, allow them room to operate and grow, etc.
He is a pos and should go live in Kenya where he belongs and came from
Did you hear his response yesterday?
"I won't call it 'Islamic Extremism" HOWEVER, I WILL remind everyone here of the atrocities created by Christianity 1,200 years ago."
Basically trying to call off the attention of people being lit on fire TODAY to give everyone a history of shit that went down centuries ago.
-
Did you hear his response yesterday?
"I won't call it 'Islamic Extremism" HOWEVER, I WILL remind everyone here of the atrocities created by Christianity 1,200 years ago."
Basically trying to call off the attention of people being lit on fire TODAY to give everyone a history of shit that went down centuries ago.
And even at that Obama is DEAD FNG wrong. The Crusades were a war to oust the moslems from the Holy Land after the moslems had waged was for centuries.
He is a complete joke
-
Obama is a muslim communist drug addicted down-lo incompetent pissed-on lover of terrorists pos.
;D
-
Biggest diff btw the two obama haters (i hate him to) soul crusher and coach is that soul c is mostly trolling with many of his comments about obama but coach really believe what he is saying
you're giving 333 way too much credit
he's just as insane as Joe, if not more so
-
SecDef nominee was getting grilled on ISIS, but what can really do? Only boots on the ground (IMO) can really eradicate these nuts and I don't think most people - conservative or liberal - has the stomach for that.
Lean on other Islamic nations or give them weapons may help, but even they don't always much care for us. It's not like Jordan has any love for us.
truth
-
He has let out the worst of the worst terrorists who rejoined the fight against us.
I've told you before to not respond to posts I make to other people
for a loser who complains that I stalk him why is it that you can't stay out of conversations I'm having with other people
-
I've told you before to not respond to posts I make to other people
for a loser who complains that I stalk him why is it that you can't stay out of conversations I'm having with other people
Stfu strawpajamaboy - obama let 5 of the worst out for that deserter bergdahl remember
-
Stfu strawpajamaboy - obama let 5 of the worst out for that deserter bergdahl remember
says the guy who complains that I stalk him yet can't stop himself from replying even when I tell you to stay out of my conversations with other people.
When I want the insane, closet case perspective I will let you know
-
What is the problem w calling Obama a friend to terrorists? Everything this fng liar is about is to embolden these animals, make excuses for them, allow them room to operate and grow, etc.
He is a pos and should go live in Kenya where he belongs and came from
It seems to be the plan, doesn't it?
-
.
-
.
great job as usual making an idiotic claim on page 1 and being utterly unable to back it up
par for the course for you Joe
-
great job as usual making an idiotic claim on page 1 and being utterly unable to back it up
par for the course for you Joe
That's because you're too fuckkng blind to see what your Allah is doing.
-
That's because you're too fuckkng blind to see what your Allah is doing.
You base your life on the way you feel like a woman brah. Just because you want to believe this bullshit doesn;'t make it true, facts have to come into the picture at some point.
-
You base your life on the way you feel like a woman brah. Just because you want to believe this bullshit doesn;'t make it true, facts have to come into the picture at some point.
And people like you straw and the rest of the left whack jobs actually believe you can win this by "reasoning" and being nice.
-
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/02/19/former_ambassador_to_syria_admin_was_warned_about_growing_extremism_in_2012.html
-
Why ‘Jihadi John’ did not have a job
Canada Free Press ^ | 03/04/15 | Arthur Weinreb
Posted on 3/4/2015 10:52:49 AM by Sean_Anthony
Emwazi did not join the Islamic State because he did not have a job. He didn’t need one. He was a proud member of the family business that consisted of leeching off the state
Deputy State Department spokeswoman, Marie Harf, became a household name a couple of weeks ago when she took to the airwaves to state the real reason young people become jihadists and flock to join the Islamic State. They do so because they don’t have jobs. If only they could be gainfully employed, they wouldn’t have any wish to join ISIS where they can spend their days beheading, crucifying, burning and otherwise killing people, including babies and children simply because they are Christians, Yazidis, or Muslims who do not agree with their interpretation of Islam.
Harf took a lot of heat but she not only was just doing her job, she was doing it well. She correctly put forth the Obama administration’s position that the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam. It’s not a leap to suggest Obama and Kerry really believe that Islam has nothing to do with Islam.
A lot of information about the head chopper known as “Jihadi John” has surfaced since his true identity was revealed to be Mohammed Emwazi whose family came to the UK from Kuwait. Lacking a job had absolutely nothing whatsoever with Emwazi deciding to join the Islamic State. The reason he didn’t have a job was, he really didn’t need one. His parents didn’t need jobs either; the entire family was well looked after by the British taxpayers.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
-
BUMP for obama fail - more interested in wearing pink headphones than beating isis