Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: aliamini on February 25, 2006, 02:35:10 AM

Title: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: aliamini on February 25, 2006, 02:35:10 AM: A lot of people think Dorian had bad genetics … in probodybuildingweekly he said “I didn’t say I had bad genetics, I think I had pretty good genetics more muscular and less body fat than others … people say I had bad genetics”

Why people think he had bad genetics??
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: aliamini on February 25, 2006, 02:36:40 AM: :o
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: Mars on February 25, 2006, 02:52:56 AM: (http://www.bbszene.de/html/british_gp2004/PB075473.JPG)
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: Bluto on February 25, 2006, 04:26:26 AM: Well he didn't. End of story.
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: Croatch on February 25, 2006, 06:33:33 AM: A Mr. Olympia with good calves that are real? I don't get it.
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: hillbilly on February 25, 2006, 06:57:53 AM: who says he has bad genetics i have never heard that
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: FREAKgeek on February 25, 2006, 07:23:53 AM: a lot of times big calves mean shitty thighs
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: sarcasm on February 25, 2006, 07:44:04 AM: the only thing lacking on Dorian were his arms, very small compared to everything else, his chest could have been bigger as well.
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: JamesD on February 25, 2006, 08:25:54 AM: But there's a difference:

He HAD good genetics for building muscle, no doubt..

He did NOT have good genetics for shape, symmetry, aesthetics (ala Flex, Ray, etc).
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: aliamini on February 26, 2006, 07:44:00 AM: Quote from: JamesD on February 25, 2006, 08:25:54 AM
But there's a difference:
He HAD good genetics for building muscle, no doubt..
He did NOT have good genetics for shape, symmetry, aesthetics (ala Flex, Ray, etc).

than why they never won
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: 240 is Back on February 26, 2006, 07:45:42 AM: Quote from: aliamini on February 26, 2006, 07:44:00 AM
than why they never won

I think they could have won if they had entered natural shows instead.

But then again, they weren't soulless cheaters.
Title: Re: Bad genetics!! why??
Post by: hillbilly on February 26, 2006, 07:50:44 AM: Quote from: 240 is Back on February 26, 2006, 07:45:42 AM
I think they could have won if they had entered natural shows instead.
But then again, they weren't soulless cheaters.

Or they realised there is no money of fame in natural comps!