Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on December 22, 2016, 01:15:15 PM
-
Mike was awesome but that back was a mess
-
Here I thought he had risen from the dead.
-
Typically it seems like guys with great arms have somewhat weak backs... And guys with great backs have somewhat weak bi's.
-
You post a lot of bb related treads brah. Keep it up 8)
-
Lacked width but that bdb is like granite and very detailed, in that respect better than anyone in the o today
-
Typically it seems like guys with great arms have somewhat weak backs... And guys with great backs have somewhat weak bi's.
Ronnie Coleman may disagree with that wisdom?
-
Mike was awesome but that back was a mess
Am I right in observing that 3 of the guys in that shot are no longer with us? Fark! :'( :'( :'(
-
Great conditioning though and decent lower lat insertions
-
Munzers lack of taper and relatively undersized arms really hurt his bdb
-
Dillett loved using Matarazzo's back routines
-
Mike was awesome but that back was a mess
But those calves and biceps were insane. They were either both 22" or 24". I've read both over the years.
-
Yet he still had a christmas tree in the bdb pose and also great calves, both of which are not present in most of today's bodybuilders.
-
Ronnie Coleman may disagree with that wisdom?
That's why I said typically... Nothing typical bout ronnie
-
Am I right in observing that 3 of the guys in that shot are no longer with us? Fark! :'( :'( :'(
Genetic pre-condition.
If they haven't used roids,they would be dead at say 49 instead of 46 you know.
-
Genetic pre-condition.
If they haven't used roids,they would be dead at say 49 instead of 46 you know.
it wasn't the roids, it was spiking insulin by eating sweets.
8 inch not biceps has the background on it.
-
Typically it seems like guys with great arms have somewhat weak backs... And guys with great backs have somewhat weak bi's.
And Ronnie shot that theory to hell.
Stellar back. Stellar biceps.