Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on June 20, 2017, 03:32:18 PM

Title: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on June 20, 2017, 03:32:18 PM
(2001; first pic) was a decent first showing.

He then overbulked on Chad's orders during the offseason and ended up coming in smaller and less conditioned for the 2002 Olympia.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on June 20, 2017, 04:00:24 PM
He was very much like Samir bannout in that if he came in over a certain weight he looked worse.

Looked his best at 225lbs.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Howard on June 20, 2017, 04:20:29 PM
(2001; first pic) was a decent first showing.

He then overbulked on Chad's orders during the offseason and ended up coming in smaller and less conditioned for the 2002 Olympia.

I didn't realize that Chad Mower was training him.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on June 20, 2017, 04:56:22 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=274884.0;attach=314528;image)
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: falco on June 21, 2017, 06:59:30 AM
Hoping to see some bench declines technique.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: beakdoctor on June 21, 2017, 07:03:20 AM
Shortly after birth King Kamali was declining.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: bigkid on June 21, 2017, 07:07:14 AM
He took off a year after the 2001 Olympia and went backwards.  It was rumored that he was partying an doing a lot of club drugs during that time.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on June 21, 2017, 11:34:11 AM
Adding nothing to the debate except pathetically stupid pics (what's new)
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jaejonna on June 21, 2017, 02:57:22 PM
Thats the guy that was gonna come down to 240's crib and 'slap the ish' outta him hahahhah
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Shizzo on June 21, 2017, 02:59:26 PM
Other than a treadmill, was Kamali's career ever on an incline?
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on June 21, 2017, 03:18:21 PM
Other than a treadmill, was Kamali's career ever on an incline?

Placed top ten his first olympia..
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Shizzo on June 21, 2017, 03:20:34 PM
Placed top ten his first olympia..
On name factor alone. He was all hype from the beginning.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on June 21, 2017, 06:12:48 PM
Kamari has a small structure.

He looked best keeping under 225lbs with a small waist that, when combined with his low lat insertions, gave him his best chance for success.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 03, 2017, 12:05:44 PM
Kamari has a small structure.

He looked best keeping under 225lbs with a small waist that, when combined with his low lat insertions, gave him his best chance for success.

In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on July 03, 2017, 12:22:43 PM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......
he looks like shit.

When you have small arms you have to keep your waist small since it's impossible to proportionally add enough arms size to compensate for added waist thickness than comes with added weight.

Think about Ronnie Coleman. He always had massive arms even at 230lbs so when he was 290lbs he still looked ok. Yates only looked worse once he went over 250lbs since he had weak arms.

That big Aussie Josh has to be careful since he has average arms to always come in shredded if he loses his waist it will be over for him.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on July 03, 2017, 12:41:31 PM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......

What's with the forearms? Is it that his upper arms have atrophied due to nerve damage and look smaller in comparison, or what?
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: FREAKgeek on July 03, 2017, 01:39:23 PM
Other than a treadmill, was Kamali's career ever on an incline?

Good point. Won the nationals and became very arrogant. That would be the only show he'd ever win.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: _bruce_ on July 03, 2017, 02:02:47 PM
Shortly after birth King Kamali was declining.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: OLKE_TEXAS on July 03, 2017, 02:18:54 PM
(2001; first pic) was a decent first showing.

He then overbulked on Chad's orders during the offseason and ended up coming in smaller and less conditioned for the 2002 Olympia.

I love the top picture. One of my all time fav bb pics. King looked sliced and diced.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Howard on July 03, 2017, 02:25:42 PM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......

He looks winded, from taking a selfie. ;D
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: OLKE_TEXAS on July 03, 2017, 02:33:11 PM
He looks winded, from taking a selfie. ;D
Shut the fuck up you fat estrogen turd.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Tapeworm on July 04, 2017, 12:22:28 AM
Other than a treadmill, was Kamali's career ever on an incline?

I was in Newark airport in '99 on my way to a supplement conference and I saw King on one of those moving walkways.  He wasn't even walking.  He just stood there in his ILS stance wearing a dull expression.  There was an old woman with one leg trying to get past because her guide dog kept going and the torporous fuck wouldn't budge an inch for her.  Everyone he went past from terminals 16 to 43 hated him.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Skeletor on July 04, 2017, 02:21:14 AM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......
 

And still "growing like a weed"?
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: ESFitness on July 04, 2017, 03:42:50 AM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......

His arms in that pic are stuck in the telltale site injected bicep-angle. They get stuck like that for about a week following a few "heavy" injections. Its weird. I know from first hand experience lol.. Luckly its not permament.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: falco on July 04, 2017, 05:39:51 AM
In this pic from last week, he's claiming 288lbs.......

He must teach Flex how to photoshop forearms.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 04, 2017, 02:10:19 PM
 
And still "growing like a weed"?

 :D  how did you guess?!   ;D
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 04, 2017, 02:12:19 PM
What's with the forearms? Is it that his upper arms have atrophied due to nerve damage and look smaller in comparison, or what?

His arms in that pic are stuck in the telltale site injected bicep-angle. They get stuck like that for about a week following a few "heavy" injections. Its weird. I know from first hand experience lol.. Luckly its not permament.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on July 04, 2017, 06:49:30 PM
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on July 04, 2017, 06:52:39 PM
.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: ESFitness on July 04, 2017, 06:57:50 PM
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.

Could be.. Injust remember my arms being stuck out like that after a few days of 2cc water based in each bicep and walking around like i was. Wearing an Under bench shirt lol.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on July 04, 2017, 07:00:42 PM
2005 and he managed to hold it together 'til around here...


Titus was better though.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Nether Animal on July 04, 2017, 07:01:44 PM
Most fucked up arms in Milos' gym

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=274884.0;attach=314490;image)
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Running Wild on July 04, 2017, 07:21:22 PM
Both biceps and triceps look torn... wtf  :-X
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 04, 2017, 09:57:35 PM
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.

I love this pic of him (nh).  I was looking to post it if I could find a decent version, thanks  :)

It reminds us that - even pretty much off-season (as I believe he is here) - he didn't always have the chipmunk face, double chin and Derek Anthony style facial fluid.  I wonder if it just crept up on him?
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: jwb on July 05, 2017, 12:14:36 AM
I love this pic of him (nh).  I was looking to post it if I could find a decent version, thanks  :)

It reminds us that - even pretty much off-season (as I believe he is here) - he didn't always have the chipmunk face, double chin and Derek Anthony style facial fluid.  I wonder if it just crept up on him?
he has sunken thyroid cheeks that is about a week after a show I bet
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 07, 2017, 04:58:14 PM

From a few hours ago - I didn't mess with the aspect ratio, just (again) brightened the picture up (King - learn how to adjust your camera settings, dude!)

I left the comment box in as he's clearly happy with progress - dropped 3lbs since last week so really getting that ripped and grainy look now...
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 07, 2017, 05:01:37 PM

Just after I posted that I realised what it reminded me of....  ;D
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Running Wild on July 07, 2017, 05:14:05 PM
From a few hours ago - I didn't mess with the aspect ratio, just (again) brightened the picture up (King - learn how to adjust your camera settings, dude!)

I left the comment box in as he's clearly happy with progress - dropped 3lbs since last week so really getting that ripped and grainy look now...

Looks to be downsizing.... oil abuse will become more obvious now.
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: FREAKgeek on July 07, 2017, 05:18:14 PM
Adding nothing to the debate except pathetically stupid pics (what's new)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=632813.0;attach=731901;image)



either staring at a big mac or 1st grade flashcards
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Taffin on July 07, 2017, 06:02:31 PM
either staring at a big mac or 1st grade flashcards

 ;D
Title: Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
Post by: Danimal77 on July 08, 2017, 08:54:38 AM
What's with the forearms? Is it that his upper arms have atrophied due to nerve damage and look smaller in comparison, or what?

oil