Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Yamcha on July 08, 2018, 04:19:10 PM

Title: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 08, 2018, 04:19:10 PM
I know the outcome regardless!  :D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 08, 2018, 05:11:33 PM
It is beginning...  ;D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: chaos on July 08, 2018, 05:22:16 PM
Kinky!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Moontrane on July 08, 2018, 05:43:46 PM
It is beginning...  ;D

Be still my heart!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 08, 2018, 07:31:12 PM
I think he'll choose Judge Amy Barrett just to piss the left off even more.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 09, 2018, 02:47:30 AM
The left will meltdown and freak out no matter who it is .   
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: mazrim on July 09, 2018, 08:08:27 AM
I think he'll choose Judge Amy Barrett just to piss the left off even more.
Hopefully, seems to be the most conservative minded as well based on background.

Orin Hatch used the word "her" when he talked about it.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 09:27:13 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 10:00:17 AM
I know the outcome regardless!  :D

Right?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 10:00:31 AM
;)

Hahahahahaha!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 04:06:50 PM
Tick Tock
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 04:14:07 PM
I have to admit he is pretty good at creating theater. 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 05:00:06 PM
I have to admit he is pretty good at creating theater. 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 05:05:10 PM
Flip over to MSNBC 1 hour before the announcement:
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 05:10:38 PM
lol.  I have no idea what he will do, but if he nominates Barrett liberals heads will explode.  A woman and mother of 7, two adopted kids from Haiti, including one with special needs. 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Straw Man on July 09, 2018, 05:16:45 PM
Who gives a shit

whoever he picks will be sure to lean toward chipping away at Roe v. Wade and that will be fun when the daughters,wives and most importantly mistresses of Republicans need to get an abortion

hopefully we'll be locking up doctors and women with other women having to get back alley illegal abortions.

that will be Trump legacy and I'm sure he and the social regressives who support him will relish it.

Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 05:24:03 PM
Who gives a shit

Hopefully every American.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 05:27:05 PM
Hopefully every American.

Americans who love their country. 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 05:35:38 PM
Jr. w/ the Bants
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: polychronopolous on July 09, 2018, 05:49:12 PM
Jr. w/ the Bants

Yeah Don Jr. has really been on his A game here lately
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 06:00:35 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 09, 2018, 06:07:34 PM
;D

I love trump
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Straw Man on July 09, 2018, 06:09:06 PM
Hopefully every American.

He is going to replace the swing vote with a Federalist Society approved pick who will be to the right of John Roberts thus changing the court to a conservative majority.

That's a done deal......thus who gives a shit.

The consequences will make this country the first modern country on the globe to regress which is fitting with the Trump legacy.

Like I said I'm looking forward to all the Republicans who will no longer be able to abortions for their daughters and mistresses.    

That will be entertaining
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 09, 2018, 06:13:56 PM
He is going to replace the swing vote with a Federalist Society approved pick who will be to the right of John Roberts thus changing the court to a conservative majority.

That's a done deal......thus who gives a shit.

The consequences will make this country the first modern country on the globe to regress which is fitting with the Trump legacy.


LOL! Elections have consequences.

Btw, I give a shit. I know a LOT of people who give a shit. It was the only reason they had no reserves about pulling the lever for Trump.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 09, 2018, 06:14:04 PM
He is going to replace the swing vote with a Federalist Society approved pick who will be to the right of John Roberts thus changing the court to a conservative majority.

That's a done deal......thus who gives a shit.

The consequences will make this country the first modern country on the globe to regress which is fitting with the Trump legacy.

Like I said I'm looking forward to all the Republicans who will no longer be able to abortions for their daughters and mistresses.    

That will be entertaining

You still have 3 hags and a half a fag on there
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: polychronopolous on July 09, 2018, 06:19:07 PM
And Amy Barrett is still sitting there at 46 years old ready to replace Ginsburg.

Wouldn't that be something?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Straw Man on July 09, 2018, 06:32:14 PM
LOL! Elections have consequences.

Btw, I give a shit. I know a LOT of people who give a shit. It was the only reason they had no reserves about pulling the lever for Trump.

and the consequences are now set in stone ....thus who gives a shit

Also, we know Republicans stole a seat from Obama so spare me elections have consequences shit

Obama was elected and McConnell didn't seem to care so it's got nothing to do with elections and has everything to do with who is the most craven and corrupt and that of course is where Republicans shine

Like I said, it's going to be fun to watch Republicans not be able to get abortions for their daughters and mistresses .
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 06:43:39 PM
And Amy Barrett is still sitting there at 46 years old ready to replace Ginsburg.

Wouldn't that be something?

Or Sotomayor.  Ginsburg is probably in better health than her.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: polychronopolous on July 09, 2018, 06:50:58 PM
and the consequences are now set in stone ....thus who gives a shit

Also, we know Republicans stole a seat from Obama so spare me elections have consequences shit

Obama was elected and McConnell didn't seem to care so it's got nothing to do with elections and has everything to do with who is the most craven and corrupt and that of course is where Republicans shine

Like I said, it's going to be fun to watch Republicans not be able to get abortions for their daughters and mistresses .

Did you really just say the same dumb joke 3 times in the same thread?

Talk about a guy who has the personality of a house plant.

Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 09, 2018, 06:51:13 PM
Soon.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DgugwqBUcAAy6ci.jpg)
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: mazrim on July 09, 2018, 06:51:25 PM


hopefully we'll be locking up doctors and women with other women having to get back alley illegal abortions.

that will be Trump legacy and I'm sure he and the social regressives who support him will relish it.


It's an awfully dumb position when you make arguments like this to support it. "People are going to do it anyway so it should be a-ok". Might as well remove every law from the books then.

As far as I know only barbarians murder babies intentionally and with no remorse. Sick individuals who think that is "progress".
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: polychronopolous on July 09, 2018, 06:55:17 PM
Or Sotomayor.  Ginsburg is probably in better health than her.

Horrible health. Very real possibility.

Look for Justice Kagan to carry a flask of Wild Turkey under her robe if she's the only liberal left on the bench.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: mazrim on July 09, 2018, 07:02:55 PM
Personally believe this is a bit of a missed opportunity when you look at who could have been nominated. A lot of red flags/iffy decisions with this guy. Hopefully he doesn't turn out to be a clone of who he replaced.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 07:03:18 PM
Horrible health. Very real possibility.

Look for Justice Kagan to carry a flask of Wild Turkey under her robe if she's the only liberal left on the bench.

lol  :D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Straw Man on July 09, 2018, 08:04:41 PM
Did you really just say the same dumb joke 3 times in the same thread?

Talk about a guy who has the personality of a house plant.



joke ?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: chaos on July 09, 2018, 08:10:44 PM
Who gives a shit

whoever he picks will be sure to lean toward chipping away at Roe v. Wade and that will be fun when the daughters,wives and most importantly mistresses of Republicans need to get an abortion

hopefully we'll be locking up doctors and women with other women having to get back alley illegal abortions.

that will be Trump legacy and I'm sure he and the social regressives who support him will relish it.


Not sure I've ever seen a guy so upset about the possibility of abortion control.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Straw Man on July 09, 2018, 08:24:29 PM
Not sure I've ever seen a guy so upset about the possibility of abortion control.

Why do you think I'm upset

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension?

I said it will be FUN to watch Republicans not be able get abortions for their mistresses and daughters

All that's going to happen is abortion will revert back to the states and blue states will have it and red states won't have it (or will have vast restrictions)


Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 09, 2018, 09:31:40 PM
Why do you think I'm upset

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension?

I said it will be FUN to watch Republicans not be able get abortions for their mistresses and daughters

All that's going to happen is abortion will revert back to the states and blue states will have it and red states won't have it (or will have vast restrictions)




lol....don’t worry baby killer. Even if it’s overturned it still reverts back to the states for decision.  Since you live in Nor. Cal, rest assured you’ll still have your abortions as well as SF and Nor. Cal in general continuing its transformation into complete shitholes due to liberal leadership.

I hope you never stop posting. You’re the gift that keeps on giving 😂😂😂😂
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 09, 2018, 10:01:19 PM
lol....don’t worry baby killer. Even if it’s overturned it still reverts back to the states for decision.  Since you live in Nor. Cal, rest assured you’ll still have your abortions as well as SF and Nor. Cal in general continuing its transformation into complete shitholes due to liberal leadership.

I hope you never stop posting. You’re the gift that keeps on giving 😂😂😂😂

Curious coach.. how many orphans have you personally adopted?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: James on July 09, 2018, 10:06:00 PM

He is a lock for upholding Trump's immigration policy.

Brett Kavanaugh: “An illegal immigrant worker is not a lawful employee in the United States”

Brett Kavanaugh: “Economic expediency does not authorize an employer to displace American workers for foreign workers.”



MAGA!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 09, 2018, 10:07:46 PM
Curious coach.. how many orphans have you personally adopted?

None. How many have you advocated killing? That was one of the stupidest fucking questions to date....on any board.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 09, 2018, 10:17:13 PM
None. How many have you advocated killing? That was one of the stupidest fucking questions to date....on any board.

So you are all about women having the babies, you just don't want to get involved with what happens after that. That doesn't seem shitty to you? 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: chaos on July 09, 2018, 10:24:44 PM
Curious coach.. how many orphans have you personally adopted?
One could turn that back to you and ask how many abortions have you personally paid for?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 09, 2018, 11:45:37 PM
One could turn that back to you and ask how many abortions have you personally paid for?

Sober? 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 09, 2018, 11:46:37 PM
One could turn that back to you and ask how many abortions have you personally paid for?

Correct me if I am wrong but the average citizen isn't paying for abortions of those they don't know
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2018, 11:53:02 PM
He is a lock for upholding Trump's immigration policy.

Brett Kavanaugh: “An illegal immigrant worker is not a lawful employee in the United States”

Brett Kavanaugh: “Economic expediency does not authorize an employer to displace American workers for foreign workers.”



MAGA!

Sounds like Schumer before he did his 180 on illegal immigration. 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 10, 2018, 12:48:46 AM
Correct me if I am wrong but the average citizen isn't paying for abortions of those they don't know

They’re not? Then who’s paying for it? Here’s a hint. PPH is federally funded and it needs to end.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 10, 2018, 01:07:39 AM
They’re not? Then who’s paying for it? Here’s a hint. PPH is federally funded and it needs to end.

You are aware none of the money goes to abortions right?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 10, 2018, 03:30:38 AM
Here we go!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: James on July 10, 2018, 06:51:20 AM
You are aware none of the money goes to abortions right?


Taxpayer Funding of Abortions at Planned Parenthood:






GAO (Government Accountability Office) Finds that More Than $1.5 Billion in Tax Dollars go to Abortion Providers

AO found that these three organizations spent $410 million in federal funding between 2013 and 2015, and received $1.2 billion combined federal and state funds under federal health programs that require shared funding. In short, more than $1.5 billion in tax dollars went to abortion providers over a three-year period.

GAO found that four of the five Planned Parenthood affiliates spending the largest amount of funds from federal programs during this period were later subject to referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for possible criminal misconduct regarding fetal tissue transfer. The DOJ confirmed that an investigation is ongoing.

https://black.house.gov/media/press-releases/gao-finds-more-15-billion-tax-dollars-go-abortion-providers



Abortions funded by taxpayers continue to climb

The number of abortions funded by Minnesota taxpayers hit another all-time high in 2016, according to new data released by the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Taxpayers bankrolled a total of 4,321 abortions at a cost of $1.056 million.

"Minnesota's Court-imposed policy of tax-funded abortion allows the abortion industry to offer 'free' abortions to economically vulnerable women," said MCCL Executive Director Scott Fischbach. "This gives the industry an easy revenue stream, and it is taking full advantage—especially in the face of the long-term trend of declining overall abortions."

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2018/04/03/Abortions-funded-by-taxpayers-continue-to-climb-in-Minnesota



Illinois taxpayers to begin paying for elective abortions Jan. 1

Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner signed a bill Thursday allowing taxpayer dollars to fund abortions for women enrolled in Medicaid.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/09/28/illinois-gov-rauner-signs-bill-requiring-tax-payers-fund-abortions/

Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Thin Lizzy on July 10, 2018, 07:01:49 AM
So I guess now we have to hear about abortion from a bunch of fat chicks that no guy wants to fuck.😞
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: loco on July 10, 2018, 07:18:09 AM
So I guess now we have to hear about abortion from a bunch of fat chicks that no guy wants to fuck.😞

Straw Man?

Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Thin Lizzy on July 10, 2018, 07:49:40 AM
Straw Man?




She is representative of the typical woman at a left wing protest.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 10, 2018, 09:18:21 AM
You are aware none of the money goes to abortions right?

And I suppose you actually think PPH is an actual healthcare service. 90% of their business is abortions. Dude, pull your head out and start researching you BS instead of it just being one-sided, and before you start accusing ME of being one-sided, it's because I research most everything I post and part of that is getting a view from the other side. Where did you get the idea that PPH wasn't federally funded?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: residue on July 10, 2018, 09:24:52 AM
And I suppose you actually think PPH is an actual healthcare service. 90% of their business is abortions. Dude, pull your head out and start researching you BS instead of it just being one-sided, and before you start accusing ME of being one-sided, it's because I research most everything I post and part of that is getting a view from the other side. Where did you get the idea that PPH wasn't federally funded?
because of the fucking hyde amendment you twit.

also find one credible source saying 90% of pp's services are abortions, one credible government supported finding, not some tinfoil alex jones cook with a shity wordpress site
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: mazrim on July 10, 2018, 09:29:16 AM
So you are all about women having the babies, you just don't want to get involved with what happens after that. That doesn't seem shitty to you? 
I do foster care and there are lots of people looking to adopt but that doesn't really matter in regards to what a terrible argument that is.

Another incredibly dumb argument for murder. "Let's murder babies because we don't think people want to take care of them. Perfect solution! Then we can move on to shooting homeless people, old people, etc."

Murder is a bit more then just "shitty" I would guess.
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: loco on July 10, 2018, 09:40:51 AM
I do foster care and there are lots of people looking to adopt but that doesn't really matter in regards to what a terrible argument that is.

Another incredibly dumb argument for murder. "Let's murder babies because we don't think people want to take care of them. Perfect solution! Then we can move on to shooting homeless people, old people, etc."

Murder is a bit more then just "shitty" I would guess.

Isn't that also the same argument the Nazis used to justify the elimination of cripples and elderly people?  Useless eaters, they called them?
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: loco on July 10, 2018, 09:50:35 AM
I do foster care and there are lots of people looking to adopt but that doesn't really matter in regards to what a terrible argument that is.

Another incredibly dumb argument for murder. "Let's murder babies because we don't think people want to take care of them. Perfect solution! Then we can move on to shooting homeless people, old people, etc."

Murder is a bit more then just "shitty" I would guess.

That's commendable, mazrim!

Yeah, most Christians are pro-life, and Christians are also more than twice as likely to adopt than the general population.

https://adoption.org/who-adopts-the-most

https://www.ethicsdaily.com/christians-more-than-twice-as-likely-to-adopt-a-child-cms-21267/

https://www.barna.com/research/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-adoption/#.UnvPco2E7Tw
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 10, 2018, 11:10:21 AM
Gabby Giffords: Brett Kavanaugh’s Dangerous Views on the Second Amendment
The Truth About Guns ^ | 07/10/18 | Dan Zimmerman
Posted on 7/10/2018, 11:25:08 AM by

“In nominating Judge Kavanaugh to be the next Supreme Court justice, the Trump Administration is once again showing brazen disregard for the people it claims to protect. Judge Kavanaugh’s dangerous views on the Second Amendment are far outside the mainstream of even conservative thought and stand in direct opposition to the values and priorities of the vast majority of Americans. America needs a Supreme Court justice who respects the Second Amendment but who also realizes reasonable regulations that reduce gun violence do not infringe on anyone’s constitutional rights. But that’s not the kind of justice President Trump nominated today.” – Gabby Giffords’ statement on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 10, 2018, 11:13:19 AM
Report: Supreme Court Nominee Kavanaugh Called Hillary Clinton a B*tch
Gateway Pundit ^ | July 9, 2018 | Jim Hoft
Posted on 7/10/2018, 1:14:43 AM by EdnaMode

Opposition research being sent around about President Trump’s second nominee to the Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, accuses him of calling Hillary Clinton a bitch 21 years ago–in a private setting among friends where he was allegedly seen to mouth the b-word but not actually say it. The fate of Kavanaugh’s nomination to the high court apparently depends on whether this is seen as a resume enhancer or a nomination killer.

The Washington Post’s Robert Costa tweeted several days ago about a snippet from a book by former conservative journalist turned Democratic Party activist David Brock about a gathering he attended at the home of Laura Ingraham to watch the 1997 State of the Union address by President Bill Clinton. Brock wrote he saw Kavanaugh, who at the time worked for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr investigating the Clintons, sitting across from him at Ingraham’s place mouthing the word, “bitch” as First Lady Hillary Clinton appeared on the TV screen. Brock wrote he was so upset he had to leave the room to light up a cigarette.

Costa wrote the excerpt is from page 306 of Brock’s book, Blinded by the Right.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...




ha ha ha ha!!!! 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: James on July 10, 2018, 11:24:00 AM
Report: Supreme Court Nominee Kavanaugh Called Hillary Clinton a B*tch
Gateway Pundit ^ | July 9, 2018 | Jim Hoft
Posted on 7/10/2018, 1:14:43 AM by EdnaMode

Opposition research being sent around about President Trump’s second nominee to the Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, accuses him of calling Hillary Clinton a bitch 21 years ago–in a private setting among friends where he was allegedly seen to mouth the b-word but not actually say it. The fate of Kavanaugh’s nomination to the high court apparently depends on whether this is seen as a resume enhancer or a nomination killer.

The Washington Post’s Robert Costa tweeted several days ago about a snippet from a book by former conservative journalist turned Democratic Party activist David Brock about a gathering he attended at the home of Laura Ingraham to watch the 1997 State of the Union address by President Bill Clinton. Brock wrote he saw Kavanaugh, who at the time worked for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr investigating the Clintons, sitting across from him at Ingraham’s place mouthing the word, “bitch” as First Lady Hillary Clinton appeared on the TV screen. Brock wrote he was so upset he had to leave the room to light up a cigarette.

Costa wrote the excerpt is from page 306 of Brock’s book, Blinded by the Right.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...




ha ha ha ha!!!! 


In addition to a brilliant legal mind, he is a great judge of character.,




MAGA !
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 10, 2018, 11:54:23 AM
https://nypost.com/2018/07/09/brett-kavanaugh-is-an-excellent-pick-for-the-supreme-court


 :D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 10, 2018, 12:00:16 PM
Lol. The Dem Twitter account couldn't even bother to get a picture of the correct Justice... Tweet slamming Kavanaugh, but put a picture of Hardiman!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 10, 2018, 12:07:03 PM
Lol. The Dem Twitter account couldn't even bother to get a picture of the correct Justice... Tweet slamming Kavanaugh, but put a picture of Hardiman!
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2018, 12:28:42 PM
Straw Man?



Holy smokes.   :-\
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 10, 2018, 12:47:09 PM
And I suppose you actually think PPH is an actual healthcare service. 90% of their business is abortions. Dude, pull your head out and start researching you BS instead of it just being one-sided, and before you start accusing ME of being one-sided, it's because I research most everything I post and part of that is getting a view from the other side. Where did you get the idea that PPH wasn't federally funded?

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/05/429641062/fact-check-how-does-planned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money

What does the law say on funding abortions?

Title X does not allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Medicaid, however, does allow government money to be spent on them — in very restricted cases.

The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for "medically necessary" abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.

However, abortions are actually not a big part of what Planned Parenthood says it does — 3 percent of the services it provided last year were abortion-related

 https://www.factcheck.org/2011/04/planned-parenthood/

Abortions represent 3 percent of total services provided by Planned Parenthood, and roughly 10 percent of its clients received an abortion. The group does receive federal funding, but the money cannot be used for abortions by law.



Coach... you really shouldn't tout doing research as your strongpoint
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2018, 12:59:28 PM
Report: Supreme Court Nominee Kavanaugh Called Hillary Clinton a B*tch
Gateway Pundit ^ | July 9, 2018 | Jim Hoft
Posted on 7/10/2018, 1:14:43 AM by EdnaMode

Opposition research being sent around about President Trump’s second nominee to the Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, accuses him of calling Hillary Clinton a bitch 21 years ago–in a private setting among friends where he was allegedly seen to mouth the b-word but not actually say it. The fate of Kavanaugh’s nomination to the high court apparently depends on whether this is seen as a resume enhancer or a nomination killer.

The Washington Post’s Robert Costa tweeted several days ago about a snippet from a book by former conservative journalist turned Democratic Party activist David Brock about a gathering he attended at the home of Laura Ingraham to watch the 1997 State of the Union address by President Bill Clinton. Brock wrote he saw Kavanaugh, who at the time worked for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr investigating the Clintons, sitting across from him at Ingraham’s place mouthing the word, “bitch” as First Lady Hillary Clinton appeared on the TV screen. Brock wrote he was so upset he had to leave the room to light up a cigarette.

Costa wrote the excerpt is from page 306 of Brock’s book, Blinded by the Right.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...




ha ha ha ha!!!! 

Was he wrong? 
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2018, 01:00:18 PM
Lol. The Dem Twitter account couldn't even bother to get a picture of the correct Justice... Tweet slamming Kavanaugh, but put a picture of Hardiman!

LOL!   ;D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Yamcha on July 10, 2018, 01:34:46 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Who will be new SC appointment?
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 10, 2018, 01:38:47 PM
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/05/429641062/fact-check-how-does-planned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money

What does the law say on funding abortions?

Title X does not allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Medicaid, however, does allow government money to be spent on them — in very restricted cases.

The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for "medically necessary" abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.

However, abortions are actually not a big part of what Planned Parenthood says it does — 3 percent of the services it provided last year were abortion-related

 https://www.factcheck.org/2011/04/planned-parenthood/

Abortions represent 3 percent of total services provided by Planned Parenthood, and roughly 10 percent of its clients received an abortion. The group does receive federal funding, but the money cannot be used for abortions by law.



Coach... you really shouldn't tout doing research as your strongpoint

Nice pulling from sources that not just defend PPH but also contribute. I’ll get back to you on this later.