Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Kwon3 on September 16, 2018, 05:21:22 PM
-
Libs in the Congress failed to derail the Kavanaugh nomination through conventional means and scrutiny of his legal record, and he passed every FBI background check, so now they've bet their entire desperate battle on the tried-and-tested method of pulling some obscure woman out of the garbage heap, dusting her off, and begging her for ANYTHING that could save their pathetic last-minute attempts to block a conservative from the court. I predict this will not only fail but blow up so hard in their faces that it'll knock down the rotten MeToo 'movement' whose shaky scaffolding can't survive a firm and hard rejection by the American people with a conscience and a brain in their heads. Of course, CNN just found its new topic for a week.
The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault came forward with her explosive allegations on Sunday, saying the supposed attack "derailed me substantially for four or five years" and claiming that the episode rendered her "unable to have healthy relationships with men."
The woman, Christine Blasey Ford, is a professor at Palo Alto University, according to The Washington Post, which published her account on Sunday. Her decision to go public has capped a whirlwhind week that began when Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., sent shockwaves through Washington by announcing she had sent the FBI information about Kavanaugh she received from an anonymous accuser in July. It's also threatened to upend Kavanaugh's confirmation, as top Democrats call for a full investigation.
Many Republicans immediately pushed back Sunday, saying it was "disturbing" that the decades-old allegations surfaced just days before the Judiciary Committee is set to vote on whether to advance Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Senate floor. Republicans have given no indication that they intend to delay Thursday's key vote, as a series of Democratic senators demanded throughout the day; however, Senate Judiciary Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Chairman Chuck Grassley was working to set up follow-up calls with Kavanaugh and Ford in light of the Post report.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html)
-
#bullshit #desperation
-
Disgusting. CNN is slobbering over this and inviting far-left female guests to lend the illusion of credibility to this preposterous story. Can't believe 500,000 people watch this North Korean propaganda every day. MSNBC sucks but it's not nearly this slanted and National Enquirer-like.
New pic of the accuser:
(https://cdn1.imggmi.com/uploads/2018/9/17/59e88a0df96ce324558e018a6884fa40-full.jpg)
-
If she can't prove it , she should go to jail for at least 10 years
-
If she can't prove it , she should go to jail for at least 10 years
Solid post. Did you lend chaos your account? I already had dibs on it, too. >:(
-
Why doesn't it surprise me that Kavanaugh's accuser is a "Professor" from the Bay Area (Palo Alto) LMFAO..hahaha!
-
Why doesn't it surprise me that Kavanaugh's accuser is a "Professor" from the Bay Area (Palo Alto) LMFAO..hahaha!
She's following the liberal faux accuser playbook in sequential order, right on cue:
1) Waited almost 4 decades to mention it to anyone, including law enforcement, so there's no paper trail of the alleged event or credible contemporaneous witnesses (i.e. not best friends or her sister).
2) Only came forward at the end of the confirmation process.
3) Remained anonymous until her anonymity started to backfire on the credibility of her letter, since few people buy the feminist argument that accusing people while hiding in the shadows is a perfectly normal and legitimate way to pursue them in the law and be taken seriously.
4) Her allegations have increased in severity, from simply being pinned down briefly or wrestled with to being sexually assaulted and held against her will.
5) She refuses to explain why she waited so long or why anyone should believe her.
-
Lawyers made up the paper "presented" to the Democrats. Just BS. When Kavanaugh is in the Supreme court do you think he will remember what the Democrats did to him?
-
Lawyers made up the paper "presented" to the Democrats. Just BS. When Kavanaugh is in the Supreme court do you think he will remember what the Democrats did to him?
He damn well better. I hope he and his conservative allies overturn everything that was passed under Obama thanks to that hook-nosed fossil Ginsburg and that yeast-infection having ham beast Sotomayor.
-
She's following the liberal faux accuser playbook in sequential order, right on cue:
2) Only came forward at the end of the confirmation process.
Am under the understanding that Feinstein had this story since July and only now produced it as a last desperate attempt.
-
Am under the understanding that Feinstein had this story since July and only now produced it as a last desperate attempt.
Her Chinese spy...er...driver probably just found it for her.
-
65-1
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/09/14/dozens-of-women-who-went-to-high-school-with-kavanaugh-back-his-character-n2519010
-
Horrible act of desperation by demoncrats.
-
38 years.....seems as though Bill Cosby isn't looking as bad as we thought.
-
Another leftist liar
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/16/kavanaugh-accuser-signed-letter-fighting-trump-border-enforcement/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
-
Horrible act of desperation by demoncrats.
They tried this with Clarence Thomas. As it is now with Kavanaugh, Thomas’ senate confirmation hearing was done and dusted, and then someone leaked an FBI interview of Anita Hill to the press, reopening the hearings.
Let the accuser testify under oath about what she claims occurred when she was 15 years old. I have enough popcorn.
-
What about girl who's book bag he hid in 1st grade?
What about that, huh?
You just going to let him get away with it?
-
The Dems are trying desperatly to get this past the midterms....This has all been orchestrated...
-
If people can't see past this BS then shame on them. Fools.
-
If people can't see past this BS then shame on them. Fools.
People are really gullible and stupid. That’s how trump got elected. 8)
-
38 years.....seems as though Bill Cosby isn't looking as bad as we thought.
Legit LOL
-
New pic of the accuser:
(https://cdn1.imggmi.com/uploads/2018/9/17/59e88a0df96ce324558e018a6884fa40-full.jpg)
Now, thats funny. :D
-
now i'm hearing that she passed a lie detector test over this issue... maybe he should submit to the same test to prove his innocence... i imagine he won't take the test.. :-X :-X
-
Kavanagh's mother was a judge that headed up a property foreclosure of the accuser's close family....and accuser goes to anti-Trump rallies in a pink hat....sounds legit, haha. Wonder why she blanked all her social media over the weekend. I also wonder what it pays under the table to put yourself out there like that.
-
Kavanagh's mother was a judge that headed up a property foreclosure of the accuser's close family....and accuser goes to anti-Trump rallies in a pink hat....sounds legit, haha. Wonder why she blanked all her social media over the weekend. I also wonder what it pays under the table to put yourself out there like that.
(https://polination.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/george-soros-nazi-dem-money.jpg?w=500&h=333)
-
Ben Shapiro is the biggest simp out there and he even said this whole allegation thing is EXTREMELY dicey.
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LOL - this so called "moderator" seems obsessed with my typos
Hey Poly - do you think ANYONE on this board gives a rats ass about how I spelled the "bath" party?
Dude - you're a fucking weirdo
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LOL - this so called "moderator" seems obsessed with my typos
Hey Poly - do you think ANYONE on this board gives a rats ass about how I spelled the "bath" party?
Dude - you're a fucking weirdo
(https://media.giphy.com/media/n70eNan9X5LJS/200.gif)
-
hardly
I couldn't give a rats ass either
Maybe you're the one person on this board who cares so much about typos
-
hardly
I couldn't give a rats ass either
Maybe you're the one person on this board who cares so much about typos
I thought you just said poly seemed obsessed with your typos.
-
I don't know if what she says is true or not. I lean towards it being likely true for a couple reasons, but lets say it is just for the sake of argument. 17 years old, he got drunk at a party and pushed her into a room and groped her. He tried to take her clothes off and held his hand over her mouth when she tried to call for help. She escaped at that point. Is he the same person he was at 17? Unlike someone like Trump, or Cosby or Franken, there is no known pattern of this behavior. It appears that in the last 35 years he has led a pretty straightforward life achieving some pretty impressive goals. IF it is true, is his lying about it worse than if he said "I vaguely recall something like that happening. I don't remember it that way but I was pretty hammered and I am sorry for any grief I might have caused" or is the right answer to just stick with the denial figuring there is nothing that can be fixed at this point by coming clean and the appointment is too important for the country?
-
I thought you just said poly seemed obsessed with your typos.
yep, and asked him if he thinks anyone else gives a rats ass
-
I don't know if what she says is true or not. I lean towards it being likely true for a couple reasons, but lets say it is just for the sake of argument. 17 years old, he got drunk at a party and pushed her into a room and groped her. He tried to take her clothes off and held his hand over her mouth when she tried to call for help. She escaped at that point. Is he the same person he was at 17? Unlike someone like Trump, or Cosby or Franken, there is no known pattern of this behavior. It appears that in the last 35 years he has led a pretty straightforward life achieving some pretty impressive goals. IF it is true, is his lying about it worse than if he said "I vaguely recall something like that happening. I don't remember it that way but I was pretty hammered and I am sorry for any grief I might have caused" or is the right answer to just stick with the denial figuring there is nothing that can be fixed at this point by coming clean and the appointment is too important for the country?
I have no doubt that she is telling the truth and that Kavanaugh is lying about it.
Question is whether a few Senators will feel the same way and if that's a enough to sink him
They are both set to testify about it (not sure if that's public or not)
-
I don't know if what she says is true or not. I lean towards it being likely true
I have no doubt that she is telling the truth and that Kavanaugh is lying about it.
Typical liberals. Absolutely zero evidence and you're ready to hang the guy out to dry just because he leans to the right. You asshole are 100% what's wrong with this country.
-
Typical liberals. Absolutely zero evidence and you're ready to hang the guy out to dry just because he leans to the right. You asshole are 100% what's wrong with this country.
Since when do Trumptards ever need evidence to believe ANYTHING
-
Grasping is out of control/psycho. 99% of his posts he is raving like a lunatic. I hope this is just his online persona but with this much hatred and vitriol towards others I doubt it.
-
Typical liberals. Absolutely zero evidence and you're ready to hang the guy out to dry just because he leans to the right. You asshole are 100% what's wrong with this country.
Do you even try anymore to converse? I don't KNOW if it is true or not. I suspect it is and I would if she was Republican and he was Democrat.
-
hardly
I couldn't give a rats ass either
Maybe you're the one person on this board who cares so much about typos
(http://www.revmichaelheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/19f8156ca6607f8d326e6ed6c7db5596.jpg)
I don't know if what she says is true or not. I lean towards it being likely true for a couple reasons, but lets say it is just for the sake of argument. 17 years old, he got drunk at a party and pushed her into a room and groped her. He tried to take her clothes off and held his hand over her mouth when she tried to call for help. She escaped at that point. Is he the same person he was at 17? Unlike someone like Trump, or Cosby or Franken, there is no known pattern of this behavior. It appears that in the last 35 years he has led a pretty straightforward life achieving some pretty impressive goals. IF it is true, is his lying about it worse than if he said "I vaguely recall something like that happening. I don't remember it that way but I was pretty hammered and I am sorry for any grief I might have caused" or is the right answer to just stick with the denial figuring there is nothing that can be fixed at this point by coming clean and the appointment is too important for the country?
Prove it.
I have no doubt that she is telling the truth and that Kavanaugh is lying about it.
Question is whether a few Senators will feel the same way and if that's a enough to sink him
They are both set to testify about it (not sure if that's public or not)
Prove it.
Since when do Trumptards ever need evidence to believe ANYTHING
Deflect deflect deflect.
Do you even try anymore to converse? I don't KNOW if it is true or not. I suspect it is and I would if she was Republican and he was Democrat.
Prove it.
-
(http://www.revmichaelheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/19f8156ca6607f8d326e6ed6c7db5596.jpg)
Prove it.
Prove it.
Deflect deflect deflect.
Prove it.
you want me to prove that she's telling the truth?
-
you want me to prove that she's telling the truth?
yeah... pretty silly
-
yeah... pretty silly
pretty much par for the course for this board
-
Since when do Trumptards ever need evidence to believe ANYTHING
Where’s the evidence? No one has come forward, she couldn’t remember the date or the place it happened, the dude that she said was with Kavanaugh denied it, 65 women came to his defense. It’s another lie. This is what the libs do. Sex scandals and race bating. She a Psychologist, I’m sure if something was that traumatic she would have reported it instead of remembering it some 35 years later. She’s liar, like you, like all liberals.
Guaranfuckingtee, like ALL of the bullshit allegations they pull shit with, if Kavanaugh doesn’t get confirmed, this goes away the next day....that being said, fuck you
-
you want me to prove that she's telling the truth?
You say you believe her, based on what evidence? Your unfounded and irrational hatred of Trump ::)
yeah... pretty silly
You said you suspect he did it, way to stay objective "officer" ::)
Next you'll say you believe in God and Jesus, there's more evidence they exist than there is that this liar had any sexual assault encounter with Kavanough.
Do you even try anymore to converse? I don't KNOW if it is true or not. I suspect it is and I would if she was Republican and he was Democrat.
I try to converse when the conversers on the other end aren't being completely irrational assholes. You two have shown your facetious and spitefulness consistently throughout Trumps presidency, you and your kinds jealous hatred of Trump does nothing but hold this country back from progress and turn more people against your socialist party.
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LOL - this so called "moderator" seems obsessed with my typos
Hey Poly - do you think ANYONE on this board gives a rats ass about how I spelled the "bath" party?
Dude - you're a fucking weirdo
Ah bullshit, you just didn't know what the hell you were talking about.
Ole poly was just a little too crafty to let you get one over on him though!
-
you want me to prove that she's telling the truth?
If someone accused you of something, would you like them to prove it or would you prefer the jury just take their word for it?
moron
-
Ah bullshit, you just didn't know what the hell you were talking about.
Ole poly was just a little too crafty to let you get one over on him though!
Seems to have a real hardon for you, too. Refers to your moderator status - whoa, watch out, he's a MOD of one of the slowest forums on the site - in almost every post. I think you pissed him off with that 'ba'ath' comment. He's locked into it for a week now.
-
Seems to have a real hardon for you, too. Refers to your moderator status - whoa, watch out, he's a MOD of one of the slowest forums on the site - in almost every post. I think you pissed him off with that 'ba'ath' comment. He's locked into it for a week now.
Yeah this one goes back years. He's been growling at me ever since.
Insanely jealous since I was one of the first people in the world to predict the Trump presidency.
https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=590768.0
Straw Man, I respect your right to post on this forum but I do not have to respect your lack of knowledge nor your lifestyle.
-
You say you believe her, based on what evidence? Your unfounded and irrational hatred of Trump ::)
You said you suspect he did it, way to stay objective "officer" ::)
Next you'll say you believe in God and Jesus, there's more evidence they exist than there is that this liar had any sexual assault encounter with Kavanough.
I try to converse when the conversers on the other end aren't being completely irrational assholes. You two have shown your facetious and spitefulness consistently throughout Trumps presidency, you and your kinds jealous hatred of Trump does nothing but hold this country back from progress and turn more people against your socialist party.
I am objective. I also unlike you, have interviewed 100's of victims. I was a detective in Family Violence and worked with the Sexual assault unit. I attended a couple extensive course, {Reid Interrogation. https://www.reid.com/ } and applied it to many interviews over my career. So I'm not Bubba on the couch drinking a Budweiser telling you what I think.
I say again, I don't know what happened, but what leads me to believe she is telling the truth is 1. It is not out of the realm of norm that a 17 intoxicated individual would do what she claims happened, A bigger factor is that IF she was fabricating this tale, she would not include a third party. it is too easy just to say Bill pushed me into a room and we were all alone. She included not just a 3rd party, but a person who is a close friend of the accused. Yes he denies it, but that is a risk she would not likely take if she is fabricating it.
She informed her spouse and counselor in 2012 well before this came up. She initially didn't want to come forward openly until the letter was leaked. When it was leaked she reluctantly came forward knowing people like you would accuse her of lying. She voluntarily took a lie detector test administered by a former FBI Polygrapher. Yes, not admissible in court but guilty people don't normally volunteer for those.
So with all that, I say it is LIKELY true. And you think this is irrational?
-
I have no doubt that she is telling the truth and that Kavanaugh is lying about it.
Question is whether a few Senators will feel the same way and if that's a enough to sink him
They are both set to testify about it (not sure if that's public or not)
Do you feel the same way about the women accusing clinton of rape?
-
(https://polination.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/george-soros-nazi-dem-money.jpg?w=500&h=333)
-
You say you believe her, based on what evidence? Your unfounded and irrational hatred of Trump ::)
You said you suspect he did it, way to stay objective "officer" ::)
Next you'll say you believe in God and Jesus, there's more evidence they exist than there is that this liar had any sexual assault encounter with Kavanough.
I try to converse when the conversers on the other end aren't being completely irrational assholes. You two have shown your facetious and spitefulness consistently throughout Trumps presidency, you and your kinds jealous hatred of Trump does nothing but hold this country back from progress and turn more people against your socialist party.
LOL - who says I have to remain objective
Is ANYONE on this board objective
Look again at my statement
I'm telling you what I believe. You're free to believe whatever you want
Orin Hatch (someone who's belief ACTUALLY MATTERS) said he doesn't believe the woman in spite of having never met or spoken with her. This guy actually has a vote that matters and he's already decided that she's lying
So again, my statement below says that I believe her but it also basically says my opinions (just like yours) don't matter at all.
All that mattes is what the Senators who are voting on this believe
I have no doubt that she is telling the truth and that Kavanaugh is lying about it.
Question is whether a few Senators will feel the same way and if that's a enough to sink him
They are both set to testify about it (not sure if that's public or not)
-
If someone accused you of something, would you like them to prove it or would you prefer the jury just take their word for it?
moron
This is why Trump's eventual absence will usher in the inevitable socialist wave. It's coming care of emotional women and men who think doing the same will endear them to the pussy even when it's obviously not in their long term interest.
The far left are destroying the confidence in and fabric of the USA. If they don't win - they destroy elections. If they don't like the message - they destroy media. If they don't like the person - they destroy the justice system. They destroy the family unit and religion for control of weaker people's hearts and minds.
This hearing is just a continuation of destroying due process rights.
-
This is why Trump's eventual absence will usher in the inevitable socialist wave. It's coming care of emotional women and men who think doing the same will endear them to the pussy even when it's obviously not in their long term interest.
The far left are destroying the confidence in and fabric of the USA. If they don't win - they destroy elections. If they don't like the message - they destroy media. If they don't like the person - they destroy the justice system. They destroy the family unit and religion for control of weaker people's hearts and minds.
This hearing is just a continuation of destroying due process rights.
oh brother - what a load of horseshit
would you care to elaborate on the "far left" has destroyed elections and the media
this should be good for a laugh
BTW - the only person in the country destroying confidence in the US is the Fucking Moron in the Oval Office
-
Feinstein On Kavanaugh Accuser: 'I Can't Say That Everything Is Truthful'
(https://i1.wp.com/www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RTX6CN1A.jpg?fit=789%2C460&ssl=1)
Wait a second, so Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) sat on a secret letter given to her by Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges that she was the victim of an attempted sexual assault by a drunken 18-year-old Brett Kavanaugh 30+ years ago for weeks. Feinstein obtained the letter in July and then dropped it at zero hour last week. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who has been nominated to fill the vacancy left by Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, looked as if his confirmation was a guarantee. Now, chaos has engulfed the process. Feinstein wants scores of witnesses. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, says he will hold a hearing on Monday. The problem: Ford has gone AWOL.
Now, after all of this, Feinstein isn’t sure if Ford is being totally truthful. From Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Feinstein said, that Ford “is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this…I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/18/feinstein-on-kavanaugh-accuser-i-dont-know-if-shes-being-truthful-n2520256%3famp=true
-
oh brother - what a load of horseshit
would you care to elaborate on the "far left" has destroyed elections and the media
this should be good for a laugh
BTW - the only person in the country destroying confidence in the US is the Fucking Moron in the Oval Office
Hey Straw Man, looks like your girl might be having some cold feet on this one. (Link listed below)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1LY2E4
-
Feinstein On Kavanaugh Accuser: 'I Can't Say That Everything Is Truthful'
(https://i1.wp.com/www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RTX6CN1A.jpg?fit=789%2C460&ssl=1)
Wait a second, so Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) sat on a secret letter given to her by Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges that she was the victim of an attempted sexual assault by a drunken 18-year-old Brett Kavanaugh 30+ years ago for weeks. Feinstein obtained the letter in July and then dropped it at zero hour last week. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who has been nominated to fill the vacancy left by Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, looked as if his confirmation was a guarantee. Now, chaos has engulfed the process. Feinstein wants scores of witnesses. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, says he will hold a hearing on Monday. The problem: Ford has gone AWOL.
Now, after all of this, Feinstein isn’t sure if Ford is being totally truthful. From Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Feinstein said, that Ford “is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this…I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/18/feinstein-on-kavanaugh-accuser-i-dont-know-if-shes-being-truthful-n2520256%3famp=true
From my understanding, Ford penned the letter and sent it. She had second thoughts because there would be people that would automatically attack her for coming forward and she wasn't sure she wanted to put her family through that. However, the information leaked and her hand was forced. I think Feinstien "Sitting on it" was at the request of Ford.
If Feinstein said for a fact she knew the allegation was true, we would both have a problem with it. That she says she doesn't know, which is the reasonable position to take, you have a problem with it.
-
There's a rumor going around that she (Ford) tried doing the same thing with the Gorchich nominations
-
There's a rumor going around that she (Ford) did the tried doing the same thing with the Gorchich nominations
If this is true she should go to jail.
-
I am objective. I also unlike you, have interviewed 100's of victims.
Stopped reading right here. Unless you can provide some sort of evidence for your claim, I call 100% pure bullshit. Prove you were a cop, maybe I'd take you serious, until then you're just an average old guy that read too many books.
-
oh brother - what a load of horseshit
would you care to elaborate on the "far left" has destroyed elections and the media
this should be good for a laugh
BTW - the only person in the country destroying confidence in the US is the Fucking Moron in the Oval Office
Well, Trump has destroyed the confidence of other nations - that we will continue not to enforce our laws and make poor trade deals. I'm sure Iran noticed a difference between the last and current admins.
The left is radically idea driven and they are winning in the long term IMO because they are willing to do anything without remorse for who they ruin and are playing on people's fears and emotions. To be fair, what the GOP did with abortion they do on every issue....every issue is a scare tactic where the other side is racist, bumpkin, religious wacko, white privilege, kkk, hitler. There is no middle ground to the point where moderate dems are being forced out or forced to go into lala land politically.
-
Feinstein On Kavanaugh Accuser: 'I Can't Say That Everything Is Truthful'
(https://i1.wp.com/www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RTX6CN1A.jpg?fit=789%2C460&ssl=1)
Wait a second, so Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) sat on a secret letter given to her by Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges that she was the victim of an attempted sexual assault by a drunken 18-year-old Brett Kavanaugh 30+ years ago for weeks. Feinstein obtained the letter in July and then dropped it at zero hour last week. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who has been nominated to fill the vacancy left by Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, looked as if his confirmation was a guarantee. Now, chaos has engulfed the process. Feinstein wants scores of witnesses. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, says he will hold a hearing on Monday. The problem: Ford has gone AWOL.
Now, after all of this, Feinstein isn’t sure if Ford is being totally truthful. From Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Feinstein said, that Ford “is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this…I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/18/feinstein-on-kavanaugh-accuser-i-dont-know-if-shes-being-truthful-n2520256%3famp=true
Anyone know if the BS about Kavanough's mom being a judge in a decision against this Ford chicks parents way back in the day? Have read conflicting reports. At any rate, wouldn't surprise me if this broad took the dems bribe money support and ran.
-
Now she's saying she won't testify unless there is an FBI investigation. What pieces of shit the Dems are.
-
Now she's saying she won't testify unless there is an FBI investigation. What pieces of shit the Dems are.
I'm glad it's happening, actually. It's finally giving a national exposure to a problem that's been going on for far too long and which the media's scared to talk about - false accusations against men, unfounded claims of sexual or other harassment, slanderous assertions that companies don't promote women to jobs they feel entitled to (see how many sued Tesla under this spurious pretense, for instance), and the general fear that men now have just for kissing a woman at the end of a date or going to bed with her, not knowing if they're going to led out of their homes in handcuffs the day after.
Women are human. Humans lie. Humans are corrupt. Humans can't be trusted. That's why we have courts. That's why we have investigators and detectives. That's why we have statutes of limitations (which liberals want to abolish, or lengthen).
What we've seen in the past 11 months is the complete destruction of the reputations and careers of dozens of famous men in the arts, the media, business, and politics. But those stories are a drop in the bucket. This is happening nationwide, in schools, offices, universities, private homes, public places, you name it.
By bringing this thoroughly false and anachronistic accusation against a distinguished steward of the law with a sterling record on and off the bench, a family man supported by nearly 70 women who've known him with no track record of any misbehavior with women in his past (which has been exhaustively scrutinized by the top law enforcement agency in the country), this woman is not only doing a disservice to legitimate rape victims, but is also exposing the overreach of a movement that's spun wildly out of control and is consuming its own. McCarthyism was once a respected political-social initiative until its founder went overboard and accused one too many people of being Communists, after which he lost all credibility. The same occurred to any number of religious leaders like Jim Bakker, who scammed their followers by squeezing them for too much while delivering too little. I could go on - Nazism, Stalinism, any excessively disruptive movement that starts off with apparently good intentions but soon becomes corrupted by internal dissent and competition for peoples' wallets and attention.
Liberal is one such movement. In its obsessive desire to come across as the philosophy of tolerance and one-worldism par excellence, it's force-fed far too many people into small spaces hailing from alien cultures and religions that are thoroughly inconvencing, and now enraging, the people in the countries where they're coming to live permanently. Women now have the upper hand not only in family courts, education, and social services, but their word is now incontestable, now matter how questionable or mendacious their motives. All it takes is one unfounded accusation and a man's life is ruined. This false and politically motivated hatchet job of Mr. Kavanaugh will end badly for the Democrats and backfire massively on the "Me Too" movement, one of whose main spokespeople got caught red handed bribing a SEVENTEEN YEAR OLD into silence after sleeping with him. Guess what, she denied it too, until photos of her in bed with him emerged. Yet the movement didn't disavow her. They circled the wagons and rationalized it by saying that in the sum of things, men do it far more, so if one woman makes a mistake, it's perfectly fine. Google the support she's gotten on social media and MSM like the Huffington Post. It's vile. Hypocritical. Insane.
If this doesn't stop, and the Dems win the midterm or (god forbid) the White House in 2020, humanity will be permanently handicapped. This is NOT what the founding fathers wanted. If women were considered equal in judgment and critical thinking, it wouldn't have taken 145 years for them to get the right to VOTE. Relationships will crumble, as fear and paranoia widen the cracks to the point of breaking them. Fecundity rates, already negative for Whites, will dip deeply into the negatives, which is why they bring so many third world immigrants in the first place (they breed a lot, don't use contraception, and laugh at the idea of equality for women - they know it's nonsense). Our entire political system will be radically altered, as more women run for office and win against good men of honor as the winds of political correctness blow them out of their positions in the legislature. Expect more laws protecting half the country only. Expect a lower threshold for proof when arrested and convicting innocent men. Expect laws that guarantee anonymity to all future accusers (such laws already exist, but aren't ironclad). This is the end of humanity as we know it. Pretty soon, all that'll be left are SF1900s and Straw Men.
-
Now she's saying she won't testify unless there is an FBI investigation. What pieces of shit the Dems are.
Guy has been vetted by the FBI something like five times over the years.
She's delusional.
They are trying to stop the vote because dumbasses actually think they have a shot at the Senate in November.
More delusions. ::)
-
Guy has been vetted by the FBI something like five times over the years.
She's delusional.
They are trying to stop the vote because dumbasses actually think they have a shot at the Senate in November.
More delusions. ::)
Naturally the Dems are "believing" everything she says because it's politically expedient and they're a shameless bunch of America-hating assholes who only care about seats in 6 weeks.
But the fact that about 40% of the country is also on board (to go by social media postings and how women believe everything other women say) is terrifying. It's now enough for a liberal arts college professor to challenge a supreme court nominee with impeccable credentials on the basis of a fabrication that's 4 decades old that even she admits she can't remember the details of, right down to the YEAR it happened. This isn't a free country anymore. It's a fucking Chinese re-education camp for political hostages of the Left.
-
Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono tells every man in the United States to shut up and step up at 0:26. Incredible. Hatred of men is now mainstream in the Congress among those who vote Democrat.
-
Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono tells every man in the United States to shut up and step up at 0:26. Incredible. Hatred of men is now mainstream in the Congress among those who vote Democrat.
I apologize for this person who represents my state. She is an embarrassment. Every time she opens her mouth I hang my head in shame.
Regarding these allegations, I am not surprised at all. Outrageous and grossly unfair, but not surprising. It's part of the liberal/statist/progressive playbook.
Saw this posted by Candace Owens:
Democrats guide to fighting conservative wins:
1) Protest and scream
2) Accuse the candidate of racism
3) Claim that if elected, this candidate will somehow dial back human rights
4) Accuse the candidate of sexual assault. <—— (we are here).
-
Guy has been vetted by the FBI something like five times over the years.
She's delusional.
They are trying to stop the vote because dumbasses actually think they have a shot at the Senate in November.
More delusions. ::)
True
-
Kavanaugh's accuser Christine Ford, invited to testify about her alleged experience with nominee Kavanaugh before the senate next Monday, has declined to attend, citing a new condition: The FBI has to conduct a "full" investigation into her claims until she agrees any senate hearings.
Classic bait & hook pyramid scheme: Make explosive claims, promises, or accusations, then, when offered the opportunity to elaborate on them, begin creating implausible excuses and setting impossible conditions to avoid doing so. Women do this every day, ask any man you know. The whole thing is a Democrat-inspired hitjob to keep a conservative off the court - they've known about this since JULY, and their "star" witness just choked on them.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-demands-full-investigation-by-fbi-before-testifying-in-letter-from-her-lawyers.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-demands-full-investigation-by-fbi-before-testifying-in-letter-from-her-lawyers.html)
-
She'll be summoned and disposed of as a kook - not even these weak republicans will let this be delayed that way. My guess is she just figured out her life is of no value to the dems in about a week and her cover is gone. The rest of her life will be a mess for volunteering for this.
Dems will say the sexual deviant prez picked and covered for the sexual deviant justice to rally the base for mid-terms.
-
She'll be summoned and disposed of as a kook - not even these weak republicans will let this be delayed that way. My guess is she just figured out her life is of no value to the dems in about a week and her cover is gone. The rest of her life will be a mess for volunteering for this.
Dems will say the sexual deviant prez picked and covered for the sexual deviant justice to rally the base for mid-terms.
Don't underestimate the bitch's thirst for a second career in media. "Stormy" Daniels's scumbag lawyer, unknown before she went public, is now showcasing for a Presidential run with open air rallies and prostituting himself out to every news network that'll listen to him. He's even ditched his famous client to going back to dancing in seedy bars (Tucker raked him over the coals for this when they toed down on Fox the other day) just to promote himself and his upcoming book. This liberal arts teacher is likely trying to do the same, because she never breathed a word about it to the press until he was nominated for the highest court in the country. That's how you know she's dreaming of a book deal or a part-time job on one of the bigger liberal networks below:
(https://i.postimg.cc/nzfNzPcv/Dm_Yk_N33_W4_AEF9_GG.jpg)
-
There's a rumor going around that she (Ford) tried doing the same thing with the Gorchich nominations
Well by all means.. lets spread the rumor ::)
-
Guy has been vetted by the FBI something like five times over the years.
She's delusional.
They are trying to stop the vote because dumbasses actually think they have a shot at the Senate in November.
More delusions. ::)
Vetting would not produce an incident like this unless the investigators happen to contact the victim during the vetting process.
-
Stopped reading right here. Unless you can provide some sort of evidence for your claim, I call 100% pure bullshit. Prove you were a cop, maybe I'd take you serious, until then you're just an average old guy that read too many books.
Cool, send me your email in a PM
-
Vetting would not produce an incident like this unless the investigators happen to contact the victim during the vetting process.
You know why the vetting failed to produce this subject and her stories during the discovery process? Because it didn't exist. They investigate tangible, real, verifiable people, not political sockpuppets who get scraped from the bottom of the Democratic barrel when conventional screening failed to disqualify a qualified candidate. It's what the Soviets referred to as "kompromat", compromising material used to discredit people they couldn't defeat through any other means that happened to be a thorn in their side. It's like the proverbial minority accusing a cop of beating them or planting drugs on them, releasing a skewed and decontextualized cellphone video of themselves appearing to be victimized, and hoping a groundswell of support within their racial community and among liberal semen dispensaries with guilty consciences saves them from facing the law for what they did, plus (hopefully) a seven-figure settlement to live off of once it's all settled. It's a hail mary pass that shouldn't even get a hearing and be dismissed as last-minute quackery, but this is 2018 and the lunatics run the asylum (Twitter, Facebook).
Cool, send me your email in a PM
Why can't you post proof publicly? Redact your name if you need to. Only cowards do things through private channels, or people who have something to hide. Hey, wait a minute, you're a Democrat, right? ;)
-
Just when you think women and the Left can't get more pathetic, they prove you wrong with their latest zany appeals to the collective insanity of their community:
(https://i.postimg.cc/Gmsm5KzZ/Screenshot_2018-09-19_02.48.40.png)
These dumb liberal motherfuḉkers raised $53,000 in just one day. The target was 50K, so they had to close donations for fear of exceeding the threshold. LMFAO. Great, an overpaid liberal 'professor' just made what an average steel worker or plumber makes in a year in return for accusing an innocent man of something he never did. Nice. How can we get in on that? Oh right, you need to be the right race, gender, political affiliation, and have power political patrons + expensive feminist lawyers. Damn.
-
Wonder if Agnostic's gonna log onto his Twitter account and join in the liberal anti-police bonanza going on in this Tweet:
https://twitter.com/_SJPeace_/status/1042139058397487104 (https://twitter.com/_SJPeace_/status/1042139058397487104)
No, you won't because deep down, if you're a cop (which you're not), you'd know this is a classic example of a black suspect being taken down after eleven orders to step out of his vehicle. It's all on tape and the Left still doesn't believe it. This country's finished. Assholes like you ruined it by empowering women and shitskins into bullying their way above the law and decency in a country that used to be based on both.
-
Sen. Hirono: Men Need To "Shut Up," Kavanaugh Accuser Needs To Be Believed And I Believe Her
(https://secondnexus.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/hironokav.jpg)
Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) told men to "shut up and step up" when it comes to Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault accusation. Asked whether her being one of four women on the Senate Judiciary Committee impacts the Kavanaugh confirmation proceedings, Senator Hirono says, "I just want to say to the men of this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change."
"Not only do women like Dr. Ford, who bravely comes forward, need to be heard, but they need to be believed. They need to be believed," Hirono said. "We cannot continue the victimization and the smearing of someone like Dr. Ford."
"We have to create an environment where women can come forward and be heard and be listened to. I want to thank Dr. Ford. I commend her courage. I believe her," the Senator said.
Hirono told the media that she would "expect the members of the press" to "talk about how unfair" Kavanaugh's accuser is being treated at a press conference Tuesday evening.
"I expect that from you guys," she said to the press.
SEN. MAZIE HIRONO (D-HI): I think we all know when something is not fair, when something smells. This is so patently not fair to her and what really bothers me and gets me so angry that the White House is victimizing this person. Why don't we get that out there? Why should we participate in the victimization of someone who has the courage to come forward? And she is under no obligation to participate in a smearing of her and her family. That is why I am very clear about what needs to happen. But at the same time if the Republicans go forward with their plan to railroad this fast-track as they have so many other nominations, I expect the members of the press to talk about how unfair that is. I don't think that is editorializing, that is laying out the facts. I expect that from you guys...
HIRONO: I expect the men in this country and the men in this committee because we all signed on to this letter to demand an FBI investigation. But really guess who is perpetuating all of these kinds of actions? It's the men in this country. And I just want to say to the men in this country: just shut up and step up, do the right thing for a change.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/09/18/sen_hirono_on_kavanaugh_men_need_to_shut_up_accuser_needs_to_be_believed_and_i_believe_her.html
-
This triggered 18-20 liberal feminists, hahahaha, couldn't take a joke.
#truth hurts
#liars hate the truth
#not as fun when you're the one being accused
#white women are absolutely insane
(https://i.postimg.cc/2Sb787q7/Screenshot_2018-09-19_05.08.50.png)
-
Vetting would not produce an incident like this unless the investigators happen to contact the victim during the vetting process.
That wasn't my point.
The loon is personally asking for an FBI investigation into it after all these years.
This coming at a time when the FBI probably knows what brand of toilet paper this guy uses.
Dems got played.
They didn't expect GOP to willingly hold a hearing on Monday, delaying tomorrow's vote.
So it has now changed from her wanting to be heard to her demanding an FBI investigation first.
Good luck with that. It ain't gonna happen.
-
:(
this is ridiculous
-
This triggered 18-20 liberal feminists, hahahaha, couldn't take a joke.
#truth hurts
#liars hate the truth
#not as fun when you're the one being accused
#white women are absolutely insane
(https://i.postimg.cc/2Sb787q7/Screenshot_2018-09-19_05.08.50.png)
LOL
-
That wasn't my point.
The loon is personally asking for an FBI investigation into it after all these years.
This coming at a time when the FBI probably knows what brand of toilet paper this guy uses.
Dems got played.
They didn't expect GOP to willingly hold a hearing on Monday, delaying tomorrow's vote.
So it has now changed from her wanting to be heard to her demanding an FBI investigation first.
Good luck with that. It ain't gonna happen.
Not to mention, the FBI is the FEDERAL bureau of investigations. F-E-D-E-R-A-L. "Attempted" rape (really, sexual assault, since something is either rape or it isn't), is a state offense, in 1982 as today. It could only be investigated by a federal agency at the express and strict orders of the executive branch (the President), who has already stated he will not be wasting taxpayer money and delaying this nomination any further for a handful of craven assholes who want to win seats in 6 weeks to push their agenda and play politics as the fate of the SCOTUS hangs in the balance. Enough is enough. He said he'd be open to letting this liar and fraud have her day in front of the people whose votes will decide whether justice Kavanaugh gets appointed or not, but no more. And sure enough, she flaked, as all liars do. This is over. They're voting on Wednesday and THAT'S IT. Let the liberals melt on Twitter, nobody reads their shit anyway besides other liberals.
-
Cool, send me your email in a PM
Done
-
“We’ve offered Dr. Ford the opportunity to share her story with the committee, as her attorney said yesterday she was willing to do,” Grassley said in a statement. “We offered her a public or a private hearing as well as staff-led interviews, whichever makes her most comfortable. Nothing the FBI or any other investigator does would have any bearing on what Dr. Ford tells the committee, so there is no reason for any further delay.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-faces-death-threats-110145932.html
-
President Trump on Wednesday said he is eager to hear from Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who is accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault when they were teenagers.
“I really want to see her; I would really want to see what she has to say,” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House before departing for North Carolina, where he will survey damage from Hurricane Florence.
“If she shows up, that would be wonderful,” Trump said Wednesday. “If she doesn’t show up, that would be unfortunate.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-wants-hear-kavanaughs-accuser-doesnt-think-can-change-mind-144714156.html
-
Not to mention, the FBI is the FEDERAL bureau of investigations. F-E-D-E-R-A-L. "Attempted" rape (really, sexual assault, since something is either rape or it isn't), is a state offense, in 1982 as today. It could only be investigated by a federal agency at the express and strict orders of the executive branch (the President), who has already stated he will not be wasting taxpayer money and delaying this nomination any further for a handful of craven assholes who want to win seats in 6 weeks to push their agenda and play politics as the fate of the SCOTUS hangs in the balance. Enough is enough. He said he'd be open to letting this liar and fraud have her day in front of the people whose votes will decide whether justice Kavanaugh gets appointed or not, but no more. And sure enough, she flaked, as all liars do. This is over. They're voting on Wednesday and THAT'S IT. Let the liberals melt on Twitter, nobody reads their shit anyway besides other liberals.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXjivvIaCqHd6J9fmcgyYzNfvjygNGIlDbXzj1x_gqUqDML5tVMw)
-
Done
check your email
-
check your email
Respect.
-
Someone very close to me who was raped about 30 years ago when she was a teenager, told me yesterday that she would not come forward all these years later just to ruin her rapist career or to seek revenge. She's neither a Trump or a Kavanaugh advocate.
-
Someone very close to me who was raped about 30 years ago when she was a teenager, told me yesterday that she would not come forward all these years later just to ruin her rapist career or to seek revenge. She's neither a Trump or a Kavanaugh advocate.
Follow up question. Why not? Is it because she wouldn't want to face the allegations, being called a liar, having to talk about it to the world, or she just doesn't feel the rapist deserves to be derailed because he just raped her? Maybe if he was applying for a job as a bank manager, I could understand that.. but what if he was applying to be a police officer, open a day care, or become a supreme court justice? From your post it seems she feels her rapists doesn't deserve to have to answer for the rape. If so, that's certainly her choice.
-
Someone very close to me who was raped about 30 years ago when she was a teenager, told me yesterday that she would not come forward all these years later just to ruin her rapist career or to seek revenge. She's neither a Trump or a Kavanaugh advocate.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/p0RDMJGgMXF96/giphy.gif)
-
(https://media.giphy.com/media/p0RDMJGgMXF96/giphy.gif)
I can sometimes be a bit dense. I have no idea what your reply suggests. Do you think rape is funny? Perhaps you believe only blacks rape.
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
-
I can sometimes be a bit dense. I have no idea what your reply suggests. Do you think rape is funny? Perhaps you believe only blacks rape.
I guess bolding the parts of your post wasn't obvious enough, so I'll get started on making an etch-a-sketch for you explaining how claiming to have been raped 3 decades earlier without telling anyone or doing anything is absurd enough with the preposterous proviso that it was done to rescue the alleged rapist's career prospects. If we know anything about women it's that they don't care what effects their actions have on people, and the vast majority tell everyone everything about their personal lives, whether it's the police or just a friend. She sounds as credible as this piece of shit accusing Kavanaugh of groping her 36 years ago, conveniently while the Dems are seething at Trump appointing not one, but soon 2 conservative judges they can't manipulate the way they do the voters and the Congress.
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
Now the libs are claiming only a handful of those 65 actually responded to calls asking if they still support him or not. When all else fails, turn reality on its head. That's the liberal mantra.
As I said, this is going to backfire so badly on the MeToo movement and feminism in general that no one will ever take their accusations seriously again. They've taken this way too far and pushed the limits of what even sympathetic and progressive people are willing to believe. Men are fed up with being accused of baseless accusations and having their careers railroaded by a process that's neither due nor fair nor capable of clearing them, since you can't prove a negative. Enough's enough.
-
Follow up question. Why not? Is it because she wouldn't want to face the allegations, being called a liar, having to talk about it to the world, or she just doesn't feel the rapist deserves to be derailed because he just raped her? Maybe if he was applying for a job as a bank manager, I could understand that.. but what if he was applying to be a police officer, open a day care, or become a supreme court justice? From your post it seems she feels her rapists doesn't deserve to have to answer for the rape. If so, that's certainly her choice.
Ever considered the possibility that everything she was bullshit? You're picking apart the possible outcomes and logic for what she did by assuming it's true. That's what all pigs do. It's why a woman can scratch her arm, strange herself, leave some kind of mark, and then call the police and accuse her boyfriend of doing it ,and they'll arrest him because she clearly has the most visible physical signs of abuse. You guys are assholes. You're for sale and bought.
Don't fucking tell me there aren't plenty of men sitting in jail cells awaiting trial or wrongly convicted by women who slept with them consensually, then decided it was rape because they regretted doing it and aren't above abusing the court system to get their revenge on their innocent partners. It happens all the time, and recently a story just like that made national news. Who knows how many others pull this shit on the daily. Few get prosecuted.
https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/woman-who-made-false-rape-claim-sentenced-to-prison/ (https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/woman-who-made-false-rape-claim-sentenced-to-prison/)
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
If the above is all correct
She’s Done
Likely she was put up to do this & make a false accusation
She should be investigated & prosecuted if proven to be lying.
Jeez - How the Feeble minded Liberal Leftists will Breakdown
And need more counselling & quiet rooms.
Pathetic Bunch.
-
If the above is all correct
She’s Done
Likely she was put up to do this & make a false accusation
She should be investigated & prosecuted if proven to be lying.
Jeez - How the Feeble minded Liberal Leftists will Breakdown
And need more counselling & quiet rooms.
Pathetic Bunch.
You think this battle was tough? Wait a few months when we trade the old decrepit jalopy in for a newer more reliable model capable of running for the next 40 years.
(https://record.umich.edu/sites/default/files/styles/inline-full-width/public/150206_justicerbg.jpg?itok=CLLH_EqL)
(http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/barrett_headshot.jpg)
-
The FBI investigated Anita Hills claim and the FBI obviously does background and security checks
Just more hypocrisy from the GOP and Trumptard
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
No way she shows, Joe.
I just can't see it.
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote- She wrote the letter when Kavanaugh was on the short list. It was held back because she had second thoughts about undergoing the fallout which was sure to come from the right. She apparently was correct.
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)- Irrelevant
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense- Jeffrey Dalhmer could have found 65 people who would attest to the fact he did not kill and eat them. It only proves he did not eat them, not that he didn't kill and eat others.
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it- Well, there you go.. and so you conclude "no one believers her" Yet the mere fact she included one of his own buddies as a witness lends some crediblity just for the very thing that happened. He could simply say it never happened. But what he said was he didn't recall it. Of course we know now he wrote a book on being a teen age alcoholic and binge drinking to the point of blacking out more than once so...
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump. -She is a democrat that donated small amounts of money to the democratic party. She is one of many doctors that signed a letter against forced family separation. That hardly makes her a left wing nut case.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever- You mean zero neutral witnesses. That is actually often the case in incidents like this. Doesn't mean she's lying, it just means abusers tend to remove their victims from others before attacking them for this very reason.
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!- I think as part of the background process, which is done to insure the person being asked to fill a job is fit, it would be reasonable to put some effort into this allegation. Had the allegation come up during the course of their background check do you think the FBI would have ignored it? of course not, they would have looked into it. Not for criminal reasons but in order to obtain information to pass on to the committee.
I'm sure you are outstanding as a coach and trainer
-
The FBI investigated Anita Hills claim and the FBI obviously does background and security checks
Just more hypocrisy from the GOP and Trumptard
Hill’s claims were recent, and were deemed unfounded. Great reference, you fucking moron.
-
I'm sure you are outstanding as a coach and trainer
Legit question....someone makes a claim, no evidence, no witnesses, no proof, decades after the fact...hiw do you even start to investigate?
-
Legit question....someone makes a claim, no evidence, no witnesses, no proof, decades after the fact...hiw do you even start to investigate?
The same way they 'investigate' domestic violence calls: They ask neighbors, relatives of the 'victim', look for signs of physical trauma (even if self-inflicted), screen the accused for previous calls or reports about the same type of accusation, and then submits the case to the local district attorney for prosecution.
Notice how in that entire chain of events, there's no requirement for clear and incontrovertible evidence that anything actually happened, nor that the accused was the one who did it. They basically leave it up to a jury to decide.
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
I agree.
-
You think this battle was tough? Wait a few months when we trade the old decrepit jalopy in for a newer more reliable model capable of running for the next 40 years.
(https://record.umich.edu/sites/default/files/styles/inline-full-width/public/150206_justicerbg.jpg?itok=CLLH_EqL)
(http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/barrett_headshot.jpg)
I'm actually thinking Sotomayor might go before the Notorious RBG.
-
Well well well, what a surprise!
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/18/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-and-links-ge/
Look at what’s going on with Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation proceedings for the Supreme Court, and the fingerprints of George Soros are all over it.
First there was a report from June in the Daily Caller that found “a new political advocacy group that vowed to put $5 million behind an effort to stop … Kavanaugh’s confirmation has significant ties to the liberal financier” Soros.
What are those ties?
The group, Demand Justice, established in 2018, gets its money from the Sixteen Thirty Fund — and the Sixteen Thirty Fund received roughly $2.2 million from the Open Society Policy Center, one of Soros’ outlets, between the years of 2012 and 2016.
-
Sounds legit, lol.
-
Hill’s claims were recent, and were deemed unfounded. Great reference, you fucking moron.
ROTFLMAO!
-
Legit question....someone makes a claim, no evidence, no witnesses, no proof, decades after the fact...hiw do you even start to investigate?
Typically you would interview the accused and accuser to lock down the story. Since he is saying it never happened you won't get much from him. From her, you may or may not get the home it happened in. If the floorplan fits what she described that adds credibility. If the owners can confirm that room had a stereo that could be turned up, another straw. Not saying after these many years that will happen but it could. They'll work on finding out if they can determine other people at the party. Who did she hang out with at the time, did she go there alone, that kind of stuff.
Mark Judge, his not recalling it could be that it didn't happen, could be he binge drank as he says he was prone to do and blacked out.
At the end of the day, I don't think it's possible to prove it happened or disprove it happened. There are things they could find that would lend credibility to one side of the story or the other and report the findings without drawing a conclusion.
Again, I can get past the "I was 17 and drunk" argument. I've never done that but lets say he did. It was a bad thing. It obviously caused her a lot of emotional strife. But if there is nothing in his record or history to indicate a pattern or even a repeat of this, then for me, I would not disqualify him for it. However if it turns out to be likely true, and he chose to deny it rather than own it, that would speak to current integrity and is a different story. My best guess is due to the time that has passed, people who may have known anything about it either dying, moving away and not having contact, it will turn out to be inconclusive. But I do think it ought to be looked into.
-
Typically you would interview the accused and accuser to lock down the story. Since he is saying it never happened you won't get much from him. From her, you may or may not get the home it happened in. If the floorplan fits what she described that adds credibility. If the owners can confirm that room had a stereo that could be turned up, another straw. Not saying after these many years that will happen but it could. They'll work on finding out if they can determine other people at the party. Who did she hang out with at the time, did she go there alone, that kind of stuff.
Mark Judge, his not recalling it could be that it didn't happen, could be he binge drank as he says he was prone to do and blacked out.
At the end of the day, I don't think it's possible to prove it happened or disprove it happened. There are things they could find that would lend credibility to one side of the story or the other and report the findings without drawing a conclusion.
Again, I can get past the "I was 17 and drunk" argument. I've never done that but lets say he did. It was a bad thing. It obviously caused her a lot of emotional strife. But if there is nothing in his record or history to indicate a pattern or even a repeat of this, then for me, I would not disqualify him for it. However if it turns out to be likely true, and he chose to deny it rather than own it, that would speak to current integrity and is a different story. My best guess is due to the time that has passed, people who may have known anything about it either dying, moving away and not having contact, it will turn out to be inconclusive. But I do think it ought to be looked into.
(https://i.postimg.cc/52BjhFRn/beatnik.gif)
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/52BjhFRn/beatnik.gif)
Maybe you're having an off day. Whatever is going on, I hope tomorrow things are better for you
-
Typically you would interview the accused and accuser to lock down the story. Since he is saying it never happened you won't get much from him. From her, you may or may not get the home it happened in. If the floorplan fits what she described that adds credibility. If the owners can confirm that room had a stereo that could be turned up, another straw. Not saying after these many years that will happen but it could. They'll work on finding out if they can determine other people at the party. Who did she hang out with at the time, did she go there alone, that kind of stuff.
Mark Judge, his not recalling it could be that it didn't happen, could be he binge drank as he says he was prone to do and blacked out.
At the end of the day, I don't think it's possible to prove it happened or disprove it happened. There are things they could find that would lend credibility to one side of the story or the other and report the findings without drawing a conclusion.
Again, I can get past the "I was 17 and drunk" argument. I've never done that but lets say he did. It was a bad thing. It obviously caused her a lot of emotional strife. But if there is nothing in his record or history to indicate a pattern or even a repeat of this, then for me, I would not disqualify him for it. However if it turns out to be likely true, and he chose to deny it rather than own it, that would speak to current integrity and is a different story. My best guess is due to the time that has passed, people who may have known anything about it either dying, moving away and not having contact, it will turn out to be inconclusive. But I do think it ought to be looked into.
You're not going to get anything from her either since she already said she's not testifying. She's not testifying because it's bullshit.
-
Maybe you're having an off day. Whatever is going on, I hope tomorrow things are better for you
Why would you write this?
(https://i.postimg.cc/xjJvWXjz/The_thread_where_nothing_is_sacred.jpg)
-
You're not going to get anything from her either since she already said she's not testifying. She's not testifying because it's bullshit.
He pretends to be a cop on the Internet while promoting a far-left agenda in all his posts and claiming to understand what rape victims go through.
-
You're not going to get anything from her either since she already said she's not testifying. She's not testifying because it's bullshit.
'
'
Coach, you are wrong.. You likely have no experience with victims of sexual assault. It's not the same as testifying that you signed a contract with X for 12 months to train them and X at 4 months refuses to pay. It's traumatic. Who in their right mind would go before a hostile group of people on national tv (or in private) knowing going in they don't have the means or the experience to determine anything. Her request that the FBI look into it is reasonable considering she knows already that the majority of Republicans won't listen to a word she says.
-
He pretends to be a cop on the Internet while promoting a far-left agenda in all his posts and claiming to understand what rape victims go through.
Chaos is a moderator. He can confirm I am a retired cop. Not that it matters in the big picture. I speak as a private citizen, though I do have experience and insight in some things others might not. Doesn't mean I am always right. It's my opinion. And for the record. This is the only account I have had since joining when you were in diapers. I'm sorry you are having a tough time of it, but trust me, projecting your anger on me isn't going to help and it will only make you look stupid(er)
-
'
'
Coach, you are wrong.. You likely have no experience with victims of sexual assault. It's not the same as testifying that you signed a contract with X for 12 months to train them and X at 4 months refuses to pay. It's traumatic. Who in their right mind would go before a hostile group of people on national tv (or in private) knowing going in they don't have the means or the experience to determine anything. Her request that the FBI look into it is reasonable considering she knows already that the majority of Republicans won't listen to a word she says.
1) She doesn't need the Republicans to listen to her. She's being offered the chance to speak with a bipartian group led by Chuck Grassley, no friend of Kavanaugh's, in her home state, to avoid inconveniencing her by flying to DC to allow the accused to face his accuser. Her lawyer had agreed to this on Monday, and today reneged on her commitment and stopped returning the media's phonecalls and voicemails.
If someone robs your house, do you wait 36 years to report it? She obviously wanted attention, which is why she brought this to the attention of the senate to begin with. Who does that? She had the local police if she wanted to pursue it in law. The FBI doesn't deal with state crimes or allegations of them. Again, you want to hold the entire SCOTUS process hostage because it suits your leftist agenda and you don't care about the rights of the accused.
-
Chaos is a moderator. He can confirm I am a retired cop. Not that it matters in the big picture. I speak as a private citizen, though I do have experience and insight in some things others might not. Doesn't mean I am always right. It's my opinion. And for the record. This is the only account I have had since joining when you were in diapers. I'm sorry you are having a tough time of it, but trust me, projecting your anger on me isn't going to help and it will only make you look stupid(er)
Why do I need chaos to confirm it? I asked you to post proof of it here and you failed to do so. What've you got to hide? No ex cops I know are afraid to admit to it, in fact, most are proud of their service.
-
Why can't you post proof publicly? Redact your name if you need to. Only cowards do things through private channels, or people who have something to hide. Hey, wait a minute, you're a Democrat, right? ;)
-
Why do I need chaos to confirm it? I asked you to post proof of it here and you failed to do so. What've you got to hide? No ex cops I know are afraid to admit to it, in fact, most are proud of their service.
You need Chaos to confirm it because that's how it works on this board. You may not believe it but there are people on this board who would wish you were gunned down by the sniper in Las Vegas and describe you bleeding out in almost pornographic terms, I mean sick people... So the standard procedure is to prove it through Ron or a moderator. You should understand my concern, there are sicko's on this site. And Chaos has credibility, he is a moderator, AND he and I have argued at every turn. He has no reason to lie for me. If that ain't enough, then continue on in your delusion.What do you do for a living by the way?
-
You need Chaos to confirm it because that's how it works on this board. You may not believe it but there are people on this board who would wish you were gunned down by the sniper in Las Vegas and describe you bleeding out in almost pornographic terms, I mean sick people... So the standard procedure is to prove it through Ron or a moderator. You should understand my concern, there are sicko's on this site. And Chaos has credibility, he is a moderator, AND he and I have argued at every turn. He has no reason to lie for me. If that ain't enough, then continue on in your delusion.What do you do for a living by the way?
No, it doesn't work like that. If you have proof, post it. If you don't. then shut the fuck up. See how that works? Now you know why this thread was started, because that lying cumbag in California is doing the same thing.
-
chaos can tonguejack my hairy ass. I don't care what he has to say, which is why I rejected his PM asking me who I was two months ago. His views on politics aside, we have nothing in common. But he's more of a man than you, since I'm pretty sure he'd tell me what he does for a living if I asked him.
Stop being a pussy and hiding behind other men for protection, ya nutless windbag.
-
chaos can tonguejack my hairy ass. I don't care what he has to say, which is why I rejected his PM asking me who I was two months ago. His views on politics aside, we have nothing in common. But he's more of a man than you, since I'm pretty sure he'd tell me what he does for a living if I asked him.
Stop being a pussy and hiding behind other men for protection, ya nutless windbag.
What do you do for a living? I'm a retired police Commander
-
What do you do for a living? I'm a retired police Commander
I'll be glad to answer that once you post proof of the above. Until then, you're another Internet fraud pretending to live a life you don't actually live.
-
I suspect it wouldn't matter and now who is the chicken s*it who won't post their occupation?
-
I suspect it wouldn't matter and now who is the chicken s*it who won't post their occupation?
I asked you to post proof of your job, which you're using a credential for being more educated on the subject of assault and rape than coach. I make no such claims based on my own profession. Therefore, if you can't prove you are what you say you are, why should anyone believe you?
-
I asked you to post proof of your job, which you're using a credential for being more educated on the subject of assault and rape than coach. I make no such claims based on my own profession. Therefore, if you can't prove you are what you say you are, why should anyone believe you?
and I asked you simply to tell me what you do for a living.
-
and I asked you simply to tell me what you do for a living.
Why is that relevant? I'm not claiming to know more on this subject based on my job. You are. See the difference?
-
I asked you to post proof of your job, which you're using a credential for being more educated on the subject of assault and rape than coach. I make no such claims based on my own profession. Therefore, if you can't prove you are what you say you are, why should anyone believe you?
I DID prove it. Ask Chaos. Unless you have reason to doubt his integrity
-
You need Chaos to confirm it because that's how it works on this board. You may not believe it but there are people on this board who would wish you were gunned down by the sniper in Las Vegas and describe you bleeding out in almost pornographic terms, I mean sick people... So the standard procedure is to prove it through Ron or a moderator. You should understand my concern, there are sicko's on this site. And Chaos has credibility, he is a moderator, AND he and I have argued at every turn. He has no reason to lie for me. If that ain't enough, then continue on in your delusion.What do you do for a living by the way?
dodge, weave, deflect
;D
-
I DID prove it. Ask Chaos. Unless you have reason to doubt his integrity
I don't believe it until I see it. You should know all about that, being Agnostic. ;)
-
dodge, weave, deflect
;D
You're new here so maybe you are just ignorant. I provided proof to a moderator. Its not really my problem you don't know how it works here
-
You're new here so maybe you are just ignorant. I provided proof to a moderator. Its not really my problem you don't know how it works here
I've never heard of this. I'm new, so maybe you can direct me to the list of guidelines that says you can't prove who you are or what you do for a living unless a moderator approves it first.
-
I don't believe it until I see it. You should know all about that, being Agnostic. ;)
I give my permission for Chaos if he feels it necessary because you are going through something, to provide the proof to you, then fine. I don't feel the need to post my credentials on here where there are nut cases that wish you were gunned down. I'm sure you understand
-
And I hope whatever is affecting you, is temporary and you get back to your old self soon
-
I give my permission for Chaos if he feels it necessary because you are going through something, to provide the proof to you, then fine. I don't feel the need to post my credentials on here where there are nut cases that wish you were gunned down. I'm sure you understand
Proving my point below:
Why can't you post proof publicly? Redact your name if you need to. Only cowards do things through private channels, or people who have something to hide. Hey, wait a minute, you're a Democrat, right?
-
And I hope whatever is affecting you, is temporary and you get back to your old self soon
What's affecting me? You've said this 5 times in the past hour but haven't given any specifics. Shed some light on this epiphany you've been having.
-
What's affecting me? You've said this 5 times in the past hour but haven't given any specifics. Shed some light on this epiphany you've been having.
well, are you always an annoying prick, or is something bothering you? I mean the list of gimmicks was Alex Jones stuff. I've been here 14 years.. have only had this account. I have been on record as being against having gimmick accounts. I think they are juvenile and cowardly. If you won't say it under your real account, don't say it at all. But you went off on a tangent about me being a part of a dozen accounts. Now I know that is bogus, you probably know that is bogus, but it has me concerned about your well being.
-
well, are you always an annoying prick, or is something bothering you? I mean the list of gimmicks was Alex Jones stuff. I've been here 14 years.. have only had this account. I have been on record as being against having gimmick accounts. I think they are juvenile and cowardly. If you won't say it under your real account, don't say it at all. But you went off on a tangent about me being a part of a dozen accounts. Now I know that is bogus, you probably know that is bogus, but it has me concerned about your well being.
I get plenty of PMs of people who say they like my posts/threads and have said so in public threads as well. Other than you and "Stan" Diego, I can't think of anyone here I have a problem with. Even if there was, I'm not here to be your best friend or make you feel warm and fuzzy inside. Your politics and social views are shit covered in diarrhea sprinkles and I'm going to remind you of that whenever you post in my threads, which this one is. I'm the same as I was yesterday or the day before that, so once again, you can't give me a specific example of anything I said or did different.
You sound a lot like a few people here and reply to them right away at times, which is very suspicious behavior. You also won't prove you do what you say you did as a career choice. Overall, you're not very credible and come off as hysterical and emo.
-
I get plenty of PMs of people who say they like my posts/threads and have said so in public threads as well. Other than you and "Stan" Diego, I can't think of anyone here I have a problem with. Even if there was, I'm not here to be your best friend or make you feel warm and fuzzy inside. Your politics and social views are shit covered in diarrhea sprinkles and I'm going to remind you of that whenever you post in my threads, which this one is. I'm the same as I was yesterday or the day before that, so once again, you can't give me a specific example of anything I said or did different.
You sound a lot like a few people here and reply to them right away at times, which is very suspicious behavior. You also won't prove you do what you say you did as a career choice. Overall, you're not very credible and come off as hysterical and emo.
Can you downsize your post? You haven't earned the right yet to post a lengthy post that takes effort.
-
Can you downsize your post? You haven't earned the right yet to post a lengthy post that takes effort.
This is you being Straw Man. In the other thread, you're being Stan Diego. And in another thread, you're being "Agnostic" 007. See what I mean? You're nuts.
-
Ill offer you this deal. You don't mention me, or comment on my posts or threads and I won't mention you, or comment on your posts or threads. Does that sound fair?
-
This is you being Straw Man. In the other thread, you're being Stan Diego. And in another thread, you're being "Agnostic" 007. See what I mean? You're nuts.
Again.. only one account.. for 14 years. Never had a gimmick, never will. If you can prove I have a gimmick, I will leave this site forever, if you can't you leave. Open offer
-
Again.. only one account.. for 14 years. Never had a gimmick, never will. If you can prove I have a gimmick, I will leave this site forever, if you can't you leave. Open offer
It's impossible to prove through IPs, since they change regularly, so posting style is the most reliable technique, and yours is uncannily similar to those two other guys. Hate to be the one to say it.
Ill offer you this deal. You don't mention me, or comment on my posts or threads and I won't mention you, or comment on your posts or threads. Does that sound fair?
What's in it for me?
-
It's impossible to prove through IPs, since they change regularly, so posting style is the most reliable technique, and yours is uncannily similar to those two other guys. Hate to be the one to say it.
What's in it for me?
Hate to be the one to say it but you are wrong. And I encourage you to think over the times in your life when you absolutely thought you were right... because this is clearly a time when you were wrong, so maybe there are others. I can't prove I am not any other poster except to say, ask some long time posters here that you respect. Take their input seriously. I have been posting like I said since 2004. I have always been who I said I was, never deviated. I have voiced my disdain more than once over people that log on under gimmicks because I think it is juvenile. I would advocate for a policy that banned anyone who was posting under a gimmick but I don't run the site. Chaos has my police credentials. I trust him though we are on opposite sides of the argument on many issues, I have never had a reason to question his integrity.
-
Hate to be the one to say it but you are wrong. And I encourage you to think over the times in your life when you absolutely thought you were right... because this is clearly a time when you were wrong, so maybe there are others. I can't prove I am not any other poster except to say, ask some long time posters here that you respect.
Yeah, that's a tough one.
Take their input seriously. I have been posting like I said since 2004. I have always been who I said I was, never deviated. I have voiced my disdain more than once over people that log on under gimmicks because I think it is juvenile. I would advocate for a policy that banned anyone who was posting under a gimmick but I don't run the site.
Based on your treatment of the subject of this thread and the unfounded accusations against him, politically motivated all the way through, I find it hard to believe you apply a different standard on here. Me saying you're a gimmick is no different than what she's doing, yet you took her side from day 1. Hypocrite.
Chaos has my police credentials. I trust him though we are on opposite sides of the argument on many issues, I have never had a reason to question his integrity.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM/giphy.gif)
-
Yeah, that's a tough one.
Based on your treatment of the subject of this thread and the unfounded accusations against him, politically motivated all the way through, I find it hard to believe you apply a different standard on here. Me saying you're a gimmick is no different than what she's doing, yet you took her side from day 1. Hypocrite.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM/giphy.gif)
Hard to take someone who is 1 Kwon out of 3 serious but ok
I said from day one, I lean towards her being truthful because of a few reasons. No one I know of has fabricated a lie that includes a best friend of the accused being present. The risk is too great that Bros before Hoes would come into play. No, most people fabricating this story would say he pushed me in the room and we were alone. But I have said I don't know if this happened or not. My stance is, it should be looked into as part of the background investigation into a Supreme Court Nominee
-
Hard to take someone who is 1 Kwon out of 3 serious but ok
There we go. This is what you've been jonesing to say all along and didn't, probably out of concern that it come off as too shallow and superficial. You literally gauge someone's credibility by their screen name. That tells me what I need to know about your powers of discernment.
I said from day one, I lean towards her being truthful because of a few reasons. No one I know of has fabricated a lie that includes a best friend of the accused being present. The risk is too great that Bros before Hoes would come into play. No, most people fabricating this story would say he pushed me in the room and we were alone. But I have said I don't know if this happened or not. My stance is, it should be looked into as part of the background investigation into a Supreme Court Nominee
You apparently never considered that the two men are not close or in contact and his 'friend' has no reason to have his back. He's actually a liberal self-employed writer and a Democrat, so politically, he's soundly on the Left, which is why you don't see CNN or MSNBC trashing him for being a Republican or a Trump voter - they already looked into that and found the answer didn't suit their narrative. The fact that the entire Left establishment and liberals on social media have closed ranks around her story before she's even had the chance to speak about it publicly tells any objective observer what they need to know about this: It's political and always has been.
This woman isn't very bright. She figured by adding someone else into the picture, it wouldn't simply be he-said, she-said. She never conceived that the guy wouldn't skip to her tune or sponsor her fabricated story just to avoid Me Too-style harassment, which he's surely going to be pilloried with soon now that she exposed him by name (which he never asked for). She's also highly calculating, taking a polygraph last month before this information was ever made public. She had lawyers on standby. She now has over $50,000 tax-free dollars by means of a gofundme campaign by triggered snowflakes with money who think she's somehow in some kind of danger as a result of her own malicious actions. And, lo and behold, once she's given the option to testify - which her lawyer confirmed just 2 days ago - she ran away and hid back under the rock she crawled out of. Now her lawyer just came out confirming she won't testify or even talk to investigators in her home state. Nothing short of an "FBI" investigation will do. You can't trust someone whose conditions change by the day and who can't explain why she doesn't even remember half the details of her story. Bottom line: If she was serious about her issue with Kavanaugh, she would've taken this to the police who had jurisdiction over the place where the event allegedly took place. Telling her paid therapist about it in private sessions or her husband - in 2012, not in 1982 or 1992 or 2002 - all point to a person with an ax to grind, rather than a real problem that no one would listen to (like Bill Clinton's victims, where he was the top law enforcement officer in their state when he committed his rapes and assaults, one of them barely a year before being elected as President).
She wanted a book deal. This whole thing was a publicity stunt, hence the timing (they've known since July).
-
Ford's lawyer apparently is OK with sexual assault as long as it's done by Democrats.
Attorney Debra Katz made the rounds Monday on morning television to argue her client’s sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should be taken seriously, an appeal accepted even by the White House.
But while her client's claims have raised bipartisan concerns about Kavanaugh, Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians -- including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.
“Paula Jones' suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She's alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”
Jones, who worked as a government employee in Arkansas, accused Clinton, while governor of Arkansas in 1991, of propositioning her for sex. Clinton settled a lawsuit with Jones in 1998.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/17/lawyer-for-kavanaugh-accuser-downplayed-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-clinton-franken.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/17/lawyer-for-kavanaugh-accuser-downplayed-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-clinton-franken.html)
An expert dismisses the polygraph's significance:
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-the-most-meaningless-proof-of-christine-fords-truthfulness-out-there-right-now/ (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-the-most-meaningless-proof-of-christine-fords-truthfulness-out-there-right-now/)
-
Hard to take someone who is 1 Kwon out of 3 serious but ok
I said from day one, I lean towards her being truthful because of a few reasons. No one I know of has fabricated a lie that includes a best friend of the accused being present. The risk is too great that Bros before Hoes would come into play. No, most people fabricating this story would say he pushed me in the room and we were alone. But I have said I don't know if this happened or not. My stance is, it should be looked into as part of the background investigation into a Supreme Court Nominee
What do you think about her declining the opportunity to testify and tell her story? How is an FBI investigation going to change what she has to say? Her response seems suspicious.
-
Ford's lawyer apparently is OK with sexual assault as long as it's done by Democrats.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/17/lawyer-for-kavanaugh-accuser-downplayed-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-clinton-franken.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/17/lawyer-for-kavanaugh-accuser-downplayed-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-clinton-franken.html)
An expert dismisses the polygraph's significance:
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-the-most-meaningless-proof-of-christine-fords-truthfulness-out-there-right-now/ (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-the-most-meaningless-proof-of-christine-fords-truthfulness-out-there-right-now/)
What were the questions asked during the polygraph?
-
KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S CLASSMATE BACKS OFF CLAIM SHE HEARD ABOUT ALLEGED ASSAULT
A classmate of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is backing off of claims that she knew anything about an alleged sexual assault committed by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Cristina King Miranda, who attended high school with Ford, wrote on Facebook this week that she heard school rumors about an incident involving Kavanaugh and Ford back in the 1980s. Miranda later deleted the post and said she did not want to talk to the media about her claims.
However, Miranda spoke to NPR on Thursday and clarified that she has no information about an alleged assault.
“That it happened or not, I have no idea,” Cristina King Miranda told NPR’s Nina Totenberg. “I can’t say that it did or didn’t.”
Miranda’s new statement directly contradicts her Facebook post, in which she wrote, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”
“In my post, I was empowered and I was sure it probably did [happen],” Miranda told NPR this morning. “I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it before 50 cable channels and have my face spread all over MSNBC news and Twitter.”
Miranda said the Senate Judiciary Committee reached out to her after her post but that she would not testify if asked.
Dr. Ford previously said she had not told anyone about the incident until a therapist meeting in 2012. Ford also said the incident happened during the summer, contradicting Miranda’s assertion that she heard rumors about it in school.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/kavanaugh-accuser-classmate-backs-off/
-
"Hillary Clinton is drawn to it like a bear to donuts" LOL ;D
-
Has Fox and Friends shown the videos of Orrin Hatch and Chuck Grassley back in 1991 saying how when the Chairman and ranking members of the Judiciary committee learned of Anita's Hills claims that the the "FBI was immediately ordered to conduct and investigation" and that it was the "very right" and "appropriate thing to do" and that investigation was done before the Judiciary Committee voted
If you missed this on Fox and Friends (or maybe they didn't show it) you can see it right here.
Get ready for some good old fashioned Republican Hypocrisy:
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/1042481401755561985
-
What do you do for a living? I'm a retired police Commander
I have seen proof that backs up this claim.
-
Has Fox and Friends shown the videos of Orrin Hatch and Chuck Grassley back in 1991 saying how when the Chairman and ranking members of the Judiciary committee learned of Anita's Hills claims that the the "FBI was immediately ordered to conduct and investigation" and that it was the "very right" and "appropriate thing to do" and that investigation was done before the Judiciary Committee voted
If you missed this on Fox and Friends (or maybe they didn't show it) you can see it right here.
Get ready for some good old fashioned Republican Hypocrisy:
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/1042481401755561985
Thomas was a federal employee during the time of Hill's accusations, not a 36 year old vague memory of a 15 year old in high school.
"Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators- including with Sen. Feinstein -- sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his confirmation has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new 'information' about him," said White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec. "
Take the burlap off your head. ::) Even a blind man can see this is nothing more than a last minute delay tactic.
-
Thomas was a federal employee during the time of Hill's accusations, not a 36 year old vague memory of a 15 year old in high school.
"Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators- including with Sen. Feinstein -- sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his confirmation has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new 'information' about him," said White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec. "
Take the burlap off your head. ::) Even a blind man can see this is nothing more than a last minute delay tactic.
They would be investing a claim against Kavanaugh
It's common practice for the FBI to do background checks and investigations on judicial nominees and many other federal employees and this is no different.
-
They would be investing a claim against Kavanaugh
It's common practice for the FBI to do background checks and investigations on judicial nominees and many other federal employees and this is no different.
Which was completed.
It wasn't until the 11th hour they decided to throw this out there in a last ditch attempt to DELAY the process. They know it's bogus otherwise they would've "leaked" it 6 weeks earlier during the confirmation process.
-
Which was completed.
It wasn't until the 11th hour they decided to throw this out there in a last ditch attempt to DELAY the process. They know it's bogus otherwise they would've "leaked" it 6 weeks earlier during the confirmation process.
And now they can open it back up to investigate new information.
It only took the FBI 3 days to investigate Anita Hills allegations
I know that's the right wing spin but the facts are that she talked this both publicly and privately (which is documented with notes from her therapist) prior to Kavanaugh ever being nominated After he was nominated she contacted the WAPO tip line and her state rep (Anna Eshoo) and then at some point wrote a letter which was passed from Eshoo to Diane Feinstein who sat on it because Blasey-Ford was not willing to go public. She also passed a lie detector test.
Turns out she had good reason to fear going public because since she has she's been threatened, had her email hacked and has had to flee her home and to hire private security to protect her and her family.
I suspect it's not Democrats who are causing her family these problems.
There is no deadline or time requirement for a judicial nominee.
There is no reason to rush. We went almost a year without a ninth justice.
-
And now they can open it back up to investigate new information.
It only took the FBI 3 days to investigate Anita Hills allegations
I know that's the right wing spin but the facts are that she talked this both publicly and privately (which is documented with notes from her therapist) prior to Kavanaugh ever being nominated After he was nominated she contacted the WAPO tip line and her state rep (Anna Eshoo) and then at some point wrote a letter which was passed from Eshoo to Diane Feinstein who sat on it because Blasey-Ford was not willing to go public. She also passed a lie detector test.
Turns out she had good reason to fear going public because since she has she's been threatened, had her email hacked and has had to flee her home and to hire private security to protect her and her family.
I suspect it's not Democrats who are causing her family these problems.
There is no deadline or time requirement for a judicial nominee.
There is no reason to rush. We went almost a year without a ninth justice.
The bitch is fraud and a liar. She got given the chance to talk and pussied out, like all liberals do when their bluff gets called. Threats? Well, she should've thought about that before writing a letter to a liberal newspaper, begging her state rep. to listen to her story, and trumpeting it across the world once her identity got exposed (which is what she really wanted, otherwise she wouldn't have done this). I mean really, you want a derail a SCOTUS nominee of all things and remain in the shadows? That's not going to happen. She knew that, which is why when her name got leaked, she had a polygraph and several lawyers ready and waiting. But now she can't deliver. Typical liberal.
And don't worry about her security, she got $55,000 from angry snowflakes on Twitter (I'm sure you contributed) to do whatever she wants with. That's more than the average American auto worker makes in a year. She just got a huge jackpot for doing nothing besides smearing an innocent man. Why would anyone listen to what she has to say at this point? Anita Hill testified before the FBI investigation publicly. This whore isn't saying a word.
-
The bitch is fraud and a liar. She got given the chance to talk and pussied out, like all liberals do when their bluff gets called. Threats? Well, she should've thought about that before writing a letter to a liberal newspaper, begging her state rep. to listen to her story, and trumpeting it across the world once her identity got exposed (which is what she really wanted, otherwise she wouldn't have done this). I mean really, you want a derail a SCOTUS nominee of all things and remain in the shadows? That's not going to happen. She knew that, which is why when her name got leaked, she had a polygraph and several lawyers ready and waiting. But now she can't deliver. Typical liberal.
And don't worry about her security, she got $55,000 from angry snowflakes on Twitter (I'm sure you contributed) to do whatever she wants with. That's more than the average American auto worker makes in a year. She just got a huge jackpot for doing nothing besides smearing an innocent man. Why would anyone listen to what she has to say at this point? Anita Hill testified before the FBI investigation publicly. This whore isn't saying a word.
Hill testified AFTER the FBI investigation
From your obvious anger I wouldn't be surprised if you're one of the people who sent death threats
Seems like something a world class pussy like you would do
-
Hill testified AFTER the FBI investigation
From your obvious anger I wouldn't be surprised if you're one of the people who sent death threats
Seems like something a world class pussy like you would do
Again with the straw men. She spoke to many, many people about it before the FBI got involved. That is testimony. It doesn't need to be before a senate committee. There was plenty of evidence that Thomas was more guilty than this joke of a story against Kavanaugh, an alcohol- and drug-induced haze from 36 years ago denied by everyone from her friends to the other guy in the room to the guy accused, etc.
I don't need to threaten someone who's clearly mental and is the laughing stock of the entire conservative establishment. Even princess l doesn't believe him. When women doubt you, you've got problems.
-
I'm actually thinking Sotomayor might go before the Notorious RBG.
Well she's definitely the wild card in all of this with that serious health scare plus shoulder injury she sustained.
"The life expectancy of type 1 diabetes patients has been reported in earlier research to be 20 years shorter than a normal individual."
https://www.redorbit.com/type-1-diabetes-life-expectancy/
If Trump gets that second term, could he possibly replace Ginsburg, Breyer AND Sotomayor?? Maybe Brother Thomas hands in the gavel as well?
-
And now they can open it back up to investigate new information.
It only took the FBI 3 days to investigate Anita Hills allegations
I know that's the right wing spin but the facts are that she talked this both publicly and privately (which is documented with notes from her therapist) prior to Kavanaugh ever being nominated After he was nominated she contacted the WAPO tip line and her state rep (Anna Eshoo) and then at some point wrote a letter which was passed from Eshoo to Diane Feinstein who sat on it because Blasey-Ford was not willing to go public. She also passed a lie detector test.
Turns out she had good reason to fear going public because since she has she's been threatened, had her email hacked and has had to flee her home and to hire private security to protect her and her family.
I suspect it's not Democrats who are causing her family these problems.
There is no deadline or time requirement for a judicial nominee.
There is no reason to rush. We went almost a year without a ninth justice.
Documented as 4 perps ::) Oh wait, that was a mistake ::) If we're going to use the therapist's notes as evidence, then ALL of the notes on that patient should be open to scrutiny because such a traumatic event would certainly come up more than just one therapy session.
Reopen the investigation. While they're at it, they can investigate every blowjob she's performed over the last 36 years.
-
Documented as 4 perps ::) Oh wait, that was a mistake ::) If we're going to use the therapist's notes as evidence, then ALL of the notes on that patient should be open to scrutiny because such a traumatic event would certainly come up more than just one therapy session.
Reopen the investigation. While they're at it, they can investigate every blowjob she's performed over the last 36 years.
That might strengthen her case, though. We know how ridiculous and pathetic some men can be when a woman openly admits she enjoys sex. Even senators Graham and Hatch might vote against Kavanaugh in light of that new evidence if she promises to visit them in their private offices after the hearing. ;)
-
Wow, even Cokie Roberts is telling Ms. Ford to put up or shut up. :o
Ford made her choice. Now she needs to tell her story to the Senate: COLUMN
By COKIE ROBERTS
Sep 20, 2018, 5:06 AM ET
Christine Blasey Ford has either developed a case of cold feet or she’s playing footsie with the Democrats. Neither one of those options is useful if she wants to stop Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.
It would certainly be understandable if Ford decided not to go through the brutal spectacle of a committee hearing. Since she’s told her story, she and her family say they have been subjected to what must be terrifying insults and threats.
Any woman in the public eye can tell you about that.
In this age of anonymous Twitter postings, a brief appearance on TV can elicit the most hateful and misogynistic messages, some of them downright frightening. So, I can imagine how awful the missives headed Ford’s way must be.
But she made the choice to reveal her identity, knowing that it would upend her life. Now, she needs to tell her story to the people who will decide whether Brett Kavanaugh ascends to the Supreme Court -- the members of the United States Senate.
Absent that, she has put herself and her family in harm’s way to no end.
(https://s.abcnews.com/images/Politics/christine-blasey-yearbook-01-ht-jc-180918_hpMain_4x3_992.jpg)
It would certainly be understandable if Ford decided not to go through the brutal spectacle of a committee hearing. Since she’s told her story, she and her family say they have been subjected to what must be terrifying insults and threats.
Any woman in the public eye can tell you about that.
In this age of anonymous Twitter postings, a brief appearance on TV can elicit the most hateful and misogynistic messages, some of them downright frightening. So, I can imagine how awful the missives headed Ford’s way must be.
But she made the choice to reveal her identity, knowing that it would upend her life. Now, she needs to tell her story to the people who will decide whether Brett Kavanaugh ascends to the Supreme Court -- the members of the United States Senate.
Absent that, she has put herself and her family in harm’s way to no end.
If Ford’s lawyers are insisting on an FBI investigation in the hopes of finding some corroborating evidence of a decades-old alleged crime, that’s again understandable, but highly unlikely to happen.
And if they are taking that tack because the Democrats want to delay the confirmation process in the hopes of jettisoning Kavanaugh and energizing female voters, that’s likely to backfire.
As it is, some Republicans who had said they needed to hear from the accuser before they would vote, are now getting restless, saying that she’s been invited to testify in any way that’s comfortable for her -- in private or public, with senators or staff—and that she should do so.
The Democrats’ insistence that the Kavanaugh nomination is being railroaded sounds like politics as usual, rather than concern for a wronged woman. Perhaps they hope that the longer they string this out, the more unlikely it will be for the president to restrain his Twitter finger and that he will say something to outrage women voters.
Some Republicans in the Senate are already stepping onto treacherous terrain by suggesting that Ford is “mixed up” or “confused.” Give them a few more days and who knows what they might say.
But so far, they and the White House have, by and large, played it smart. They have repeatedly stated that Ford be respected and heard. They have focused their fire on Democrats -- not her. And as the week has progressed, and no other woman or fellow high-school partygoer has come forward, they have renewed their support for Kavanaugh, who has unblinkingly denied the allegations.
If Ford took this life-altering step because she believes that Brett Kavanaugh should not serve on the Supreme Court, then she must come forward to tell that to the Senate. And then it will be up to the members to decide what to do.
As it is now, without her testimony, it is almost certain that Judge Kavanaugh will soon become Justice Kavanaugh.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/christine-blasey-ford-made-choice-now-story-senate/story?id=57932425
-
When women start doubting your story, you're finished. I'm not implying women can't be objective and judge a case on its merits, but the trend on Twitter at the moment is overwhelming support for her by women who don't know her or anything about her case besides what they've been spoon fed in the MSM and through retweets by their followers (#standwithchristine, #ibelievechristine, #stopkavanaugh, etc....). It's fair to say, on average, most women will give another woman the benefit of the doubt, which is why most companies hire them in HR and why women prefer to talk to another woman about sexual assault than to a man. Totally understandable and fair.
But their support is conditional. If you can't prove anything you said and the man being accused is an otherwise decent, righteous person - which justice Kavanaugh is - then eventually those women will start to worry that you're hurting their cause and their image by dragging all of them into your story and discrediting the suffering or reporting by real victims of abuse. And if you're not humble and stick with your story even when it's unprovable, they will eventually turn against you. Then you're done.
-
When does he get voted in.
Enough of the silly bollocks nonsense
The democrats have tried everything to stop him
And now this with this woman who’s kept silent until
The 11th hour and none of her witnesses back her claims.
Says it all - End Of.
-
When does he get voted in.
Enough of the silly bollocks nonsense
The democrats have tried everything to stop him
And now this with this woman who’s kept silent until
The 11th hour and none of her witnesses back her claims.
Says it all - End Of.
Well said!
She's doing tremendous damage to the cause of women victims everywhere by making a parody of what assault is really all about. "I...might've been pinned down...by a man who I think is this man being nominated for the highest court in the country...my memory is blurry...I can't remember when or where this happened, or what year, or who else was involved...I am sure it was him, though. Please believe me."
-
"The FBI has said it is not investigating"
"Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, has been given a Friday deadline to decide whether to testify before the Judiciary Committee"
A lawyer for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, of sexual assault told a Senate panel the professor would be willing to testify next week if it provides "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety," an email obtained by U.S. media on Thursday showed.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/deadline-looms-accuser-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-145956468.html
-
"The FBI has said it is not investigating"
"Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, has been given a Friday deadline to decide whether to testify before the Judiciary Committee"
A lawyer for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, of sexual assault told a Senate panel the professor would be willing to testify next week if it provides "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety," an email obtained by U.S. media on Thursday showed.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/deadline-looms-accuser-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-145956468.html
That was already provided since last week. This is a classic stalling tactic: Agree to something, back out, agree to come back in if your impossible conditions are met, get shut down over it, then agree to do it under the same proposal you were offered in the first place. I predict she won't testify. Cowards never follow through in the end, it would expose them for the fraud they are.
-
Liberals gone off the deep end.
-
Well said!
She's doing tremendous damage to the cause of women victims everywhere by making a parody of what assault is really all about. "I...might've been pinned down...by a man who I think is this man being nominated for the highest court in the country...my memory is blurry...I can't remember when or where this happened, or what year, or who else was involved...I am sure it was him, though. Please believe me."
Ha - Yes Please Believe Her.
Fat chance of that her story’s got more holes in it Bin Laden’s body had.
It’s a setup it’s fake it’s dems clutching at straws.
Like I said previously it’s a load of old Bollocks
The Gullible liberal leftist Muppets Like ‘StrawWeight’ on here (as he’s not even a Lightweight)
Will fall for it & Clamour all over it. ::)
Pathetic Specimen.
-
Ha - Yes Please Believe Her.
Fat chance of that her story’s got more holes in it Bin Laden’s body had.
It’s a setup it’s fake it’s dems clutching at straws.
Like I said previously it’s a load of old Bollocks
The Gullible liberal leftist Muppets Like ‘StrawWeight’ on here (as he’s not even a Lightweight)
Will fall for it & Clamour all over it. ::)
Pathetic Specimen.
The guy who killed him was recently on the Howard Stern show.
Said he basically split his head in half with that 5.56 round.
(http://shtfplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/rob-oneill.jpg)
-
The video by Hollywood women in this link is truly sick and demented. THIS is what America's coming to. Oh my god. They want to bring Stalinism back.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/09/20/we-believe-you-hollywood-women-rally-to-defend-christine-ford-leave-ellisons-credible-accuser-in-the-dust-675943 (https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/09/20/we-believe-you-hollywood-women-rally-to-defend-christine-ford-leave-ellisons-credible-accuser-in-the-dust-675943)
-
CNN talking about this yet?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DndsWkkVAAAs4ay.jpg:large)
-
CNN talking about this yet?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DndsWkkVAAAs4ay.jpg:large)
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQI04trJmjl8DIpiQrYwRpN5ccbi-vaw60urnpvrUlBAyaObYT0)
-
Looks like the gloves are off.
Cory Booker's 1992 column detailing 'groping' of high school friend resurfaces
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8F3juDyNxZUfi3S_WmXUUmKM3535fH5g1xMgUs57ic_N_rm9I)
A 1992 column by now-Sen. Cory Booker detailing his “groping” of a high school friend has resurfaced as he pushes to delay Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings over a sexual assault allegation.
In the 1992 column for The Stanford Daily, then-Stanford University grad student Mr. Booker wrote about the New Year’s Eve incident in 1984 that he will “never forget.” In the column, titled, “So much for stealing second,” Mr. Booker said he was 15 when he fondled an intoxicated female friend.
“With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast,” he wrote. “After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.’ Our groping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did. You see, the next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”
Mr. Booker said he was conditioned to believe that sex was “a game,” and that hooking up was best achieved through “luck, guile, strategy or coercion,” and lots of alcohol. He wrote about how his attitude toward sex dramatically changed after just a couple years at Stanford, and how his work as a peer counselor listening to the “raw truth from men and women discussing rape” was a real “wake-up call” for the future senator.
“I now see the crowds, no, not the spectators, but the thousands, the millions who are rarely seen or heard,” he said of sexual assault victims.
Mr. Booker, who said this week that it would be “irresponsible” for him to not consider a 2020 presidential run, has been recently ridiculed by conservatives after he appeared to dub himself “Spartacus” by revealing confidential records during the Judge Kavanaugh hearing. The senator now wants the FBI to investigate a claim by a woman who accused Judge Kavanaugh of trying to rape her more than 35 years ago before the hearings continue.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/20/cory-bookers-1992-column-detailing-groping-high-sc/
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Proof liberals don't think anything through. They open this can of worms and appoint themselves the arbiters of decency and assume the moral high ground while their own seedy pasts catch up to them. I guess they forgot there's two sides to the accusation medallion. Soon enough, your own dirt comes out to bury you. 8)
-
Looks like the gloves are off.
Cory Booker's 1992 column detailing 'groping' of high school friend resurfaces
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8F3juDyNxZUfi3S_WmXUUmKM3535fH5g1xMgUs57ic_N_rm9I)
A 1992 column by now-Sen. Cory Booker detailing his “groping” of a high school friend has resurfaced as he pushes to delay Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings over a sexual assault allegation.
In the 1992 column for The Stanford Daily, then-Stanford University grad student Mr. Booker wrote about the New Year’s Eve incident in 1984 that he will “never forget.” In the column, titled, “So much for stealing second,” Mr. Booker said he was 15 when he fondled an intoxicated female friend.
“With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast,” he wrote. “After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.’ Our groping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did. You see, the next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”
Mr. Booker said he was conditioned to believe that sex was “a game,” and that hooking up was best achieved through “luck, guile, strategy or coercion,” and lots of alcohol. He wrote about how his attitude toward sex dramatically changed after just a couple years at Stanford, and how his work as a peer counselor listening to the “raw truth from men and women discussing rape” was a real “wake-up call” for the future senator.
“I now see the crowds, no, not the spectators, but the thousands, the millions who are rarely seen or heard,” he said of sexual assault victims.
Mr. Booker, who said this week that it would be “irresponsible” for him to not consider a 2020 presidential run, has been recently ridiculed by conservatives after he appeared to dub himself “Spartacus” by revealing confidential records during the Judge Kavanaugh hearing. The senator now wants the FBI to investigate a claim by a woman who accused Judge Kavanaugh of trying to rape her more than 35 years ago before the hearings continue.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/20/cory-bookers-1992-column-detailing-groping-high-sc/
The self-regard of progressives is unlimited.
-
I have seen proof that backs up this claim.
Thanks, maybe that will put that red herring to bed.
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Proof liberals don't think anything through. They open this can of worms and appoint themselves the arbiters of decency and assume the moral high ground while their own seedy pasts catch up to them. I guess they forgot there's two sides to the accusation medallion. Soon enough, your own dirt comes out to bury you. 8)
^ This
Why didn’t we see this outrage from democrats when Ellis or Clinton were accused with valid proof? Because it’s fake outrage. ::) Demoncrats are out to destroy anyone who gets in their way. Women need to step up and defend good men from these leftist feminists. Someday it might be your son, brother, husband, or friend in Kavanaugh's shoes. I guaranfuckintee you, any woman that had something like that happen to her would remember every detail.
-
Thanks, maybe that will put that red herring to bed.
Thank you :-*
-
What do you think about her declining the opportunity to testify and tell her story? How is an FBI investigation going to change what she has to say? Her response seems suspicious.
Just my opinion, Anita Hill went through the ringer in that forum. I don't think a public or private hearing by a committee is the appropriate venue for investigating this type of allegation. It would be better served for statements to be taken in private by professionals such as FBI investigators who don't have a dog in the hunt. I would guess that her request to have the FBI investigate would be that she knows it happened, and if they can investigate and find facts to support her allegation, then the detractors would be more likely to listen to her with an open mind.
-
Just my opinion, Anita Hill went through the ringer in that forum. I don't think a public or private hearing by a committee is the appropriate venue for investigating this type of allegation. It would be better served for statements to be taken in private by professionals such as FBI investigators who don't have a dog in the hunt. I would guess that her request to have the FBI investigate would be that she knows it happened, and if they can investigate and find facts to support her allegation, then the detractors would be more likely to listen to her with an open mind.
"They" have bent over backwards to accommodate her.
-
"They" have bent over backwards to accommodate her.
I haven't listened to the news at all today so if it hasn't changed from a hearing before a committee vs a more private setting then I don't know that they bent over backwards. I have never been the victim of a sexual assault but I would guess based on hearing from those who have, it isn't all that easy to talk about and a committee might not be the best setting.
-
^ This
Why didn’t we see this outrage from democrats when Ellis or Clinton were accused with valid proof? Because it’s fake outrage. ::) Demoncrats are out to destroy anyone who gets in their way. Women need to step up and defend good men from these leftist feminists. Someday it might be your son, brother, husband, or friend in Kavanaugh's shoes. I guaranfuckintee you, any woman that had something like that happen to her would remember every detail.
While I'm disappointed by the lopsided support the accuser has received over the accused, I do understand it. Women, generally, don't want to discredit or question a person's story because it could discredit ALL stories, including the true ones that are real and deserve prosecution. But at the same time, if they stick with far-fetched or absurd ones like Ford's, they risk irreversibly damaging the reputation of legitimate victims as well by lumping them together with fantasists, misandrists, and liars. It's a balancing act - like a black person denouncing the violence in Chicago while not letting racists and violent cops off the hook. Too much of one and you're a typical hypocritical, agenda-driven liberal. Do the other and you get subjected to a lynching on social media and among the general public. It's a little tough. Men are already jittery due to this MeToo movement, which case a wide net based on gender rather than case-by-case analysis of allegations, new and old, and this isn't helping. It's practically sending the message that all future SCOTUS nominees have to be female. It's insane.
Kavanaugh does not want or need support from men who've worked with him and know him. He needs WOMEN to step forward and defend his reputation, and while some have agreed to do so and speak (mostly to conservative outlets), not enough have denounced his accuser's stalling tactics or her childish behavior since coming out.
-
While they're at it, they can investigate every blowjob she's performed over the last 36 years.
Video? :D
"The FBI has said it is not investigating"
"Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, has been given a Friday deadline to decide whether to testify before the Judiciary Committee"
A lawyer for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, of sexual assault told a Senate panel the professor would be willing to testify next week if it provides "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety," an email obtained by U.S. media on Thursday showed.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/deadline-looms-accuser-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-145956468.html
She's been offered several different ways and venues to get her shit out, she's stalling and trying to hold the vote out as long as she can. I believe it was on for next Wednesday if I remember right.
CNN talking about this yet?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DndsWkkVAAAs4ay.jpg:large)
Demoncratically controlled media avoiding this one like the plague.
-
Video? :D
She's been offered several different ways and venues to get her shit out, she's stalling and trying to hold the vote out as long as she can. I believe it was on for next Wednesday if I remember right.
Demoncratically controlled media avoiding this one like the plague.
100% real and posted by his ex-girlfriend on social media.
https://www.twincities.com/2018/09/20/keith-ellison-abuse-allegation-ex-girlfriend-karen-monahan-posts-2017-medical-record-alleging-abuse/ (https://www.twincities.com/2018/09/20/keith-ellison-abuse-allegation-ex-girlfriend-karen-monahan-posts-2017-medical-record-alleging-abuse/)
-
Looks like the gloves are off.
Cory Booker's 1992 column detailing 'groping' of high school friend resurfaces
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8F3juDyNxZUfi3S_WmXUUmKM3535fH5g1xMgUs57ic_N_rm9I)
A 1992 column by now-Sen. Cory Booker detailing his “groping” of a high school friend has resurfaced as he pushes to delay Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings over a sexual assault allegation.
In the 1992 column for The Stanford Daily, then-Stanford University grad student Mr. Booker wrote about the New Year’s Eve incident in 1984 that he will “never forget.” In the column, titled, “So much for stealing second,” Mr. Booker said he was 15 when he fondled an intoxicated female friend.
“With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast,” he wrote. “After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.’ Our groping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did. You see, the next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”
Mr. Booker said he was conditioned to believe that sex was “a game,” and that hooking up was best achieved through “luck, guile, strategy or coercion,” and lots of alcohol. He wrote about how his attitude toward sex dramatically changed after just a couple years at Stanford, and how his work as a peer counselor listening to the “raw truth from men and women discussing rape” was a real “wake-up call” for the future senator.
“I now see the crowds, no, not the spectators, but the thousands, the millions who are rarely seen or heard,” he said of sexual assault victims.
Mr. Booker, who said this week that it would be “irresponsible” for him to not consider a 2020 presidential run, has been recently ridiculed by conservatives after he appeared to dub himself “Spartacus” by revealing confidential records during the Judge Kavanaugh hearing. The senator now wants the FBI to investigate a claim by a woman who accused Judge Kavanaugh of trying to rape her more than 35 years ago before the hearings continue.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/20/cory-bookers-1992-column-detailing-groping-high-sc/
Well at least he used to be a man. Now he's a lying, mentally retarded pussy.
-
I haven't listened to the news at all today so if it hasn't changed from a hearing before a committee vs a more private setting then I don't know that they bent over backwards. I have never been the victim of a sexual assault but I would guess based on hearing from those who have, it isn't all that easy to talk about and a committee might not be the best setting.
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/facepalm.gif)
-
Kirsten Gillibrand (D) having a full-blown meltdown at a press conference yesterday.
I believe Dr. Ford because she's telling the truth.
-
Kirsten Gillibrand (D) having a full-blown meltdown at a press conference yesterday.
"A bedroom that doesn't have two doors." Isn't that a C&W song? Tammy Wynette or Loretta Lynn?
Skidmarks of truth.
"Anita Hill ... Anita Hill." At least Ms. Hill sat at the adult table by testifying.
-
"A bedroom that doesn't have two doors." Isn't that a C&W song? Tammy Wynette or Loretta Lynn?
Skidmarks of truth.
"Anita Hill ... Anita Hill." At least Ms. Hill sat at the adult table by testifying.
Her testimony was also far more credible and RECENT than this two-faced white liberal clown in California. She typifies the leftist coward parodied on Fox News: She wanted to stay anonymous, yet sent letters to the WaPo, her congresswoman, and Sen. Feinstein. Uh, so did she intend for that letter to remain buried forever? Or was she seriously intended to remain nameless and faceless while making explosive and deadly serious accusations against a man who would neither know who she was nor be able to defend himself against her spineless and false accusations? Last I checked, you can't take someone to court and fail to appear yourself to justify what you're accusing someone else of doing. Sure, you don't have to testify, but you have to show up. She neither wants to testify nor appear in CLOSED session, or even meet anyone in private in her home state from the committee. It's so shockingly stupid if it wasn't true, and the fact that political heavies, Hollywood celebrities, and braindead/psychotic feminist maniacs across social media is so frightening that it literally should send a chill down the spine of every man running for political office right now.
-
What were the questions asked during the polygraph?
Turns out they won't share that information, and the polygraph was administered by her lawyer, not by a professional and independent lie detector expert.
-
From Fox news
Ford provided The Washington Post the results of a polygraph examination conducted by a former FBI agent in August, which reportedly showed that she had been truthful in her allegations. According to the Post, Ford took the polygraph on the advice of her attorney, Debra Katz.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/polygraph-exam-taken-by-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-comes-under-scrutiny.html
-
Turns out they won't share that information, and the polygraph was administered by her lawyer, not by a professional and independent lie detector expert.
The main question she asked was "who exactly is paying for this?"... once that got out of the way everything was true. Bloodsuckers.
-
From Fox news
Ford provided The Washington Post the results of a polygraph examination conducted by a former FBI agent in August, which reportedly showed that she had been truthful in her allegations. According to the Post, Ford took the polygraph on the advice of her attorney, Debra Katz.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/polygraph-exam-taken-by-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-comes-under-scrutiny.html
The swamp is mobile.
-
From Fox news
Ford provided The Washington Post the results of a polygraph examination conducted by a former FBI agent in August, which reportedly showed that she had been truthful in her allegations. According to the Post, Ford took the polygraph on the advice of her attorney, Debra Katz.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/polygraph-exam-taken-by-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-comes-under-scrutiny.html
I should clarify what I said: The test was conducted by someone else, but her lawyer arranged it and handpicked the person conducting it on behalf of her client. The MSM was acting like Ford hired an independent expert versed in polygraph examinations. Now, that guy might be one such person, but we don't know who he is, so we can't gauge his credentials. I've seen interviews with professionals who've conducted 30,000 or more of these over their careers. Being former LE does not automatically mean expert in polygraph tests, and until we know what the questions were, it's not final. Polygraphs are not admissible as evidence in court.
-
The main question she asked was "who exactly is paying for this?"... once that got out of the way everything was true. Bloodsuckers.
That has yet to be answered. Multiple e-mails and calls about it have not been returned to Fox News (the other networks didn't ask).
The swamp is mobile.
Yeah, well, we have a guy in office who's not for sale, doesn't pander to anyone, has the cojones to tells the press he has no attorney general (even as the guy's still in office), and doesn't pander to pressure groups or lobbies because there's nothing in it for him. In short, he's uncontrollable - by the left or the right - and that makes him the sworn enemy of creatures of the system like this guy, who works at the state department and admitted some things that left me stunned on hidden camera:
Project Veritas has released the first installment in an undercover video series unmasking the deep state. The video features a State Department employee, Stuart Karaffa, engaged in radical socialist political activity on the taxpayer's dime, while advocating for government resistance. Stuart Karaffa is also a ranking member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America (Metro DC DSA.)
Stuart Karaffa is just the first federal government employee that Project Veritas has filmed in an undercover series unmasking the deep state. More video reports are to be released soon.
-
Kirsten Gillibrand (D) having a full-blown meltdown at a press conference yesterday.
"I believe her because she's telling the truth."
Nice logic. These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.
-
"I believe her because she's telling the truth."
Nice logic. These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.
The way they see it, if you throw enough mud at something eventually it'll stick. What the Dems want is to make precedent with this case (they failed with Thomas in 1991) so that not only all future SCOTUS nominees will be discredited as the liberals see fit whenever they agenda doesn't perfectly align with the Left, but society in general will apply the same standard going forward, which basically amounts to a kind of social and legal death for men young and old of all races and backgrounds, no matter how innocent they are, if a woman decides their time is up. It's taken insanity to a whole other level.
If the Republicans lose the midterms and this bullshit succeeds, I'm betting on a civil war in under 5 years if they take the White House in 2020. Which works for us, since we're praying for it. :)
-
She keeps changing and adding to her demands ::)
Ford's lawyers outlined these demands, according to a source close to the process:
Ford will not appear any sooner than next Thursday;
No questions to be asked at hearing by any outside counsel -- only by Senators;
Mark Judge must be subpoenaed;
Kavanaugh would testify first, then Ford would testify, and Kavanaugh would have no opportunity to respond or rebut;
The Friday deadline for her to provide written statement before the hearing would be waived;
Provide adequate security;
Only one pool camera in hearing room;
Ford and Kavanaugh allotted the same amount of time to talk.
-
When does he get voted in.
Enough of the silly bollocks nonsense
The democrats have tried everything to stop him
And now this with this woman who’s kept silent until
The 11th hour and none of her witnesses back her claims.
Says it all - End Of.
Mitch McConnell is pretty much the most powerful man at this point and he says it's going through.
Looks like he has the votes and he knows it.
McConnell: Kavanaugh will be on Supreme Court 'in very near future'
(https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/caae48c/2147483647/resize/1160x>/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F0a%2Fcb%2Fb29c1672414d9aea82c65f42f3d5%2F180719-mcconnell-kavanaugh2-gty-1160.jpg)
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Friday said that Brett Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court "in the very near future" even as President Trump's nominee faces a sexual assault allegation.
"You've watched the fight, you've watched the tactics, but here's what I want to tell you: In the very near future Judge Kavanaugh will be on the United States Supreme Court," McConnell said while speaking at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C.
He added that Trump has "nominated a stunningly successful individual" and told conservatives not to get "rattled" because Senate Republicans are going to "plow right through it."
McConnell's comments come as a sexual assault allegation has thrown the timeline for a potential vote on Kavanaugh's nomination into limbo.
Republicans hold a narrow 51-49 majority in the Senate. They can only lose one GOP senator before they would need to lean on Democrats for help getting Kavanaugh confirmed.
Several Senate Republicans remain on the fence, but McConnell's comments indicate that he remains confident that Kavanaugh will get the 50 votes needed to be confirmed.
Republicans had wanted to get Kavanaugh confirmed by the end of the month, but that timeline has slipped after Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed and attempting to forcibly remove her clothes at a party in the early 1980s.
Kavanaugh has denied any wrongdoing.
McConnell's speech came as a 10 a.m. Friday deadline set by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for Ford to let the panel know if she would testify at a Monday hearing came and went without an announcement.
Ford's lawyer told Judiciary Committee staff in an email Thursday that the Monday hearing and the Friday morning deadline for a prepared copy of her testimony was a "non-starter."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/senate/407761-mcconnell-kavanaugh-will-be-on-supreme-court-in-very-near-future%3famp
-
She keeps changing and adding to her demands ::)
Ford's lawyers outlined these demands, according to a source close to the process:
Ford will not appear any sooner than next Thursday;
No questions to be asked at hearing by any outside counsel -- only by Senators;
Mark Judge must be subpoenaed;
Kavanaugh would testify first, then Ford would testify, and Kavanaugh would have no opportunity to respond or rebut;
The Friday deadline for her to provide written statement before the hearing would be waived;
Provide adequate security;
Only one pool camera in hearing room;
Ford and Kavanaugh allotted the same amount of time to talk.
She's doing what all blackmailers do and changing the rules as she goes along only to back out when they're met in order to return with a new and even more unrealistic set of conditions until finally people give up and provide her with everything she wants. This is textbook manipulator behavior and unlike in most cases where it happens, this is playing out on the international stage. The foreign press is eating it up. America is coming off as a joke where the nominees to its highest court can be hamstrung or even disqualified on the basis of one unfounded allegation by an anonymous provocateur whose entire ramshackle case would be laughed out of any room or serious discussion were it not for the considerable weight and power of the country's Democratic political establishment propping it up for political gain. It's the most repulsive and irresponsible use of the nation's media organs and political machinery to inflate a hitherto nameless troll's wildly libelous and patently false fabrications to bring down a good man in the crosshairs of an establishment that failed to disqualify him through conventional channels. It's a political hit job the Russians would be envious of.
-
This is one of the most punchable faces I've ever seen. She reminds me of every uppity school administrator, obnoxious HR generalist, mouthy social worker, or bitchy airline reservation agent spouting off a long list of reasons why a flight's delayed while 40 people in the queue start griping and shoving each other in the background. Everything that's wrong with America's pampered class of privileged white liberal women now has a face. Funny part is I knew she'd look like this being a 2nd tier college professor at a liberal arts college in Norcal.
(https://i1.wp.com/www.worldusheadlines.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Christine-Blasey-Ford-2-1.jpg?fit=620%2C300&ssl=1)
-
So this lying piece of shit somehow managed to con over 2200 braindead idiots into donating a whopping $114,662+ by means of a gofundme. That is on top of the $53,000 that was raised for her in a separate campaign days ago. Do you realize she just made close to 200K (and counting) for calling an innocent man a rapist?
America's gone completely insane. Nothing but a civil war who clean out the scum-sucking liberals who are destroying our country will suffice.
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford (https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford)
-
"I believe her because she's telling the truth."
Nice logic. These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
-
This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.
1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote
2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)
3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense
4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it
5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.
6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever
No basis for an investigation AT ALL!
Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.
If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.
-
So this lying piece of shit somehow managed to con over 2200 braindead idiots into donating a whopping $114,662+ by means of a gofundme. That is on top of the $53,000 that was raised for her in a separate campaign days ago. Do you realize she just made close to 200K (and counting) for calling an innocent man a rapist?
America's gone completely insane. Nothing but a civil war who clean out the scum-sucking liberals who are destroying our country will suffice.
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford (https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford)
LOL
-
Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.
If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.
This is akin to the "what have you got to hide" when it comes to someone invading your privacy. It's a BS position. No offense to you.
-
This is akin to the "what have you got to hide" when it comes to someone invading your privacy. It's a BS position. No offense to you.
It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.
Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.
There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.
-
It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.
Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.
There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.
I agree public figures pretty much sacrifice their private lives, but that doesn't make this kind of intrusion right. Nor should we take the "what have you got to hide" approach when it comes to an obvious politically motivated smear campaign.
-
I agree public figures pretty much sacrifice their private lives, but that doesn't make this kind of intrusion right. Nor should we take the "what have you got to hide" approach when it comes to an obvious politically motivated smear campaign.
Unfortunately, you and I can agree on these stupidities and yet we are powerless to do anything to change them. It can frustrate one to death.
-
It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.
Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.
There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.
Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown. We have proven it numerous times
-
Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown. We have proven it numerous times
Did you mean to reply to my post? Your reply is so off topic, it is hard to tell.
-
Unfortunately, you and I can agree on these stupidities and yet we are powerless to do anything to change them. It can frustrate one to death.
Not entirely powerless. Our votes matter.
-
Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown. We have proven it numerous times
According to Straw Man, presumption of innocence is an anachronistic concept from a bygone era. He prefers the Chinese legal system, where prosecutors and judges are on the same side of the bench, government-appointed lawyers don't utter a word during the trial other than "Yes, your honor" or "No, your honor" and the defendant somehow has to produce proof to discredit what the secret police manufactured against the accused because it's politically necessary.
-
Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown. We have proven it numerous times
::)
-
Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.
If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.
Epic contradictions....
-
::)
Using Democrat libgaytranscommie standards it’s as valid as anything Ford claims vs Kananaugh. But I got way more proof than that ditzy nutbag broad does
-
Using Democrat libgaytranscommie standards it’s as valid as anything Ford claims vs Kananaugh. But I got way more proof than that ditzy nutbag broad does
The best video ever made about Obama, and posted three months before he was even elected. Fits him to a T.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/8cj1gbKY/Dnv_VGDJUYAAZGa_A.jpg)
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/8cj1gbKY/Dnv_VGDJUYAAZGa_A.jpg)
Nice try ;D
-
http://tennesseestar.com/2018/09/22/researcher-uncovers-christine-blasey-fords-hidden-80s-era-high-school-social-life/
One of the enduring mysteries of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s decision to level last minute allegations of sexual misconduct against Judge Brett Kavanaugh is why her social media and online presence were so thoroughly scrubbed prior to her charges against Kavanaugh becoming public.
Although internet sleuths have tracked down a few photos and articles from Dr. Blasey Ford’s professional output, she effectively ghosted herself prior to going public – a very unusual move for someone who requested
and anticipated anonymity from the Democrats through whom she leveled the charges against Judge Kavanaugh.
The ghosting of Christine Blasey Ford was so thorough that her high school alma mater, the prestigious all-girl Holton Arms School, even pulled the yearbooks for the years during which she was a student, when a teenage Brett Kavanaugh allegedly attacked her.
However, one prescient, and as yet anonymous, blogger downloaded copies of the yearbooks and posted key pages that describe the social life of “Chrissy” Blasey and her social set.
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
-
http://tennesseestar.com/2018/09/22/researcher-uncovers-christine-blasey-fords-hidden-80s-era-high-school-social-life/
One of the enduring mysteries of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s decision to level last minute allegations of sexual misconduct against Judge Brett Kavanaugh is why her social media and online presence were so thoroughly scrubbed prior to her charges against Kavanaugh becoming public.
Although internet sleuths have tracked down a few photos and articles from Dr. Blasey Ford’s professional output, she effectively ghosted herself prior to going public – a very unusual move for someone who requested
and anticipated anonymity from the Democrats through whom she leveled the charges against Judge Kavanaugh.
The ghosting of Christine Blasey Ford was so thorough that her high school alma mater, the prestigious all-girl Holton Arms School, even pulled the yearbooks for the years during which she was a student, when a teenage Brett Kavanaugh allegedly attacked her.
However, one prescient, and as yet anonymous, blogger downloaded copies of the yearbooks and posted key pages that describe the social life of “Chrissy” Blasey and her social set.
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
Hahaa yeah, total dem plant.
-
Hahaa yeah, total dem plant.
Who raised over $400,000 in tax-free cash for personal use from liberal fanatics in the space of a week. I guess they should thank Trump that his management of the economy made that extra cash in their pocket possible. How dumb do you have to be to spend the money you gained from his tax cuts on a delusional lying sockpuppet with an already-inflated salary at her tenured professor job at a liberal arts college? Who scrubs their entire social media footprint, has their yearbooks seized, does a preemptive polygraph, and creates gofundme campaigns for themselves before their identity is even made public? LMFAO. The United States now officially has the dumbest people ever shat out on the face on the earth.
https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford (https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford)
https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs (https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs)
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8]https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8]https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8 (https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8)
"What good fortune for rulers that men do not think."
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
- Adolf Hitler
-
Who raised over $400,000 in tax-free cash for personal use from liberal fanatics in the space of a week. I guess they should thank Trump that his management of the economy made that extra cash in their pocket possible. How dumb do you have to be to spend the money you gained from his tax cuts on a delusional lying sockpuppet with an already-inflated salary at her tenured professor job at a liberal arts college? Who scrubs their entire social media footprint, has their yearbooks seized, does a preemptive polygraph, and creates gofundme campaigns for themselves before their identity is even made public? LMFAO. The United States now officially has the dumbest people ever shat out on the face on the earth.
https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford (https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford)
https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs (https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs)
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8]https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8]https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8 (https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2CHBH_enCA806CA806&q=christine+ford+gofundme&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiordfs99HdAhUIpFkKHYtjBKUQt8YBKAF6BAgEEAU&biw=3200&bih=1220&dpr=0.8)
"What good fortune for rulers that men do not think."
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
- Adolf Hitler
400k for what? Just come out and say something bad supposedly happened in your life and people will give you money ???
-
400k for what? Just come out and say something bad supposedly happened in your life and people will give you money ???
Really !!! Will They - Then I’d be a Billionaire. ;D
-
The lawyer for a woman who Brett Kavanaugh's accuser has said attended the 1980s party at which he allegedly molested her has told Senate Republican investigators that the woman doesn't recall such a gathering or know the Supreme Court nominee.
The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.
A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.
But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.
That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-latest-deadline-looms-kavanaugh-accuser-151503689--politics.html
-
The lawyer for a woman who Brett Kavanaugh's accuser has said attended the 1980s party at which he allegedly molested her has told Senate Republican investigators that the woman doesn't recall such a gathering or know the Supreme Court nominee.
The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.
A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.
But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.
That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-latest-deadline-looms-kavanaugh-accuser-151503689--politics.html
Hahaa what a clusterfuck. This Ford broad should be slapped silly.
-
Hahaa what a clusterfuck. This Ford broad should be slapped silly.
She should be sued and arrested for fraud.
-
Seems another woman has come forward now
-
Seems another woman has come forward now
Really !!!
No surprise there - Her & her lawyers have been throwing out enough bait
What a waste of time & $ on this blown up nothing allegation
It should of been laughed out long ago.
-
Seems another woman has come forward now
First one was extremely unbelievable, I can't wait to see what this lying whore has to say. ::)
-
First one was extremely unbelievable, I can't wait to see what this lying whore has to say. ::)
extremely? Hardly
-
extremely? Hardly
Very extreme.
-
Very extreme.
I'll disagree. Could I blame you for not believing it? Not really. Certainly would understand if you had your doubts. What she is saying isn't that far from the norm that it takes any stretch of the imagination to believe it could have happened. And again, if you are going to fabricate a story, most people would not include the best friend of the perpetrator as the only other eye witness to the event., That is a top 5 rule of fabricating. Make it where it's only your word against theirs or at least use a good friend of yours that will back you up.
-
I'll disagree. Could I blame you for not believing it? Not really. Certainly would understand if you had your doubts. What she is saying isn't that far from the norm that it takes any stretch of the imagination to believe it could have happened. And again, if you are going to fabricate a story, most people would not include the best friend of the perpetrator as the only other eye witness to the event., That is a top 5 rule of fabricating. Make it where it's only your word against theirs or at least use a good friend of yours that will back you up.
But he denies ever being there or such an event taking place, and a woman who recently claimed she'd been told about the event now retracted her statement. So how does including Mr. Judge help her case if he wasn't involved (and there's no reason to doubt him)?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/christine-ford-friend-leland-ingham-keyser-says-she-doesnt-recall-party-where-alleged-kavanaugh-assault-took-place.html (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/christine-ford-friend-leland-ingham-keyser-says-she-doesnt-recall-party-where-alleged-kavanaugh-assault-took-place.html)
-
I'll disagree. Could I blame you for not believing it? Not really. Certainly would understand if you had your doubts. What she is saying isn't that far from the norm that it takes any stretch of the imagination to believe it could have happened. And again, if you are going to fabricate a story, most people would not include the best friend of the perpetrator as the only other eye witness to the event., That is a top 5 rule of fabricating. Make it where it's only your word against theirs or at least use a good friend of yours that will back you up.
Exactly, she's a bad liar. All I've read from this new chick is that he supposedly showed her his ding dong at a party. Again, this dude has been in the news for weeks, he's been vetted by the FBI 6 times before, none of this stuff has ever come up before. As soon as he is supported by Trump, these lying sluts come out of nowhere? LMAO. I won't hold my breath. I can only hope they approve Kav this week and the media can go back to looking for Trump/Russia collusion. ::)
-
But he denies ever being there or such an event taking place, and a woman who recently claimed she'd been told about the event now retracted her statement. So how does including Mr. Judge help her case if he wasn't involved (and there's no reason to doubt him)?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/christine-ford-friend-leland-ingham-keyser-says-she-doesnt-recall-party-where-alleged-kavanaugh-assault-took-place.html (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/christine-ford-friend-leland-ingham-keyser-says-she-doesnt-recall-party-where-alleged-kavanaugh-assault-took-place.html)
Mr. Judge partied so hard in high school (I think we all partied at times) that he felt it was worthy of writing a book about. He writes about binge drinking to the point of blacking out. He didn't say he wasn't there. He said he doesn't remember it. Could be he was never there, or could be it was one of those times. Also remember they were best friends at the time. Her naming him makes no sense to me if she was making the story up. The logical thing to do would be to say it was just me and him. She had to know Judge saying he doesn't remember that event would hurt her credibility so why even go there?
I get that people not remembering a party doesn't help her, but I attended a lot of parties during my Junior and Senior year. If today someone from my school came forward and said "When I was at a party I was sexually assaulted by Billy Bob in a bedroom upstairs off the bathroom, I may likely have to say I don't remember that party. Again, it doesn't help her story, but I don't think it is a case for extremely unbelievable.
-
So I just read some of this liars story....she's full of shit.
Some of her closest friends for years and people that were supposedly at this party have all said she never mentioned it once, until now. While there is supposedly a witness that says every time she heard his name she would think of him waving his penis in this chicks face. ::)
I think they just found themselves a better lair and will be pushing her "story" hard next week in the media.
-
So I just read some of this liars story....she's full of shit.
Some of her closest friends for years and people that were supposedly at this party have all said she never mentioned it once, until now. While there is supposedly a witness that says every time she heard his name she would think of him waving his penis in this chicks face. ::)
I think they just found themselves a better lair and will be pushing her "story" hard next week in the media.
I'm curious to see how it plays out.
-
http://tennesseestar.com/2018/09/22/researcher-uncovers-christine-blasey-fords-hidden-80s-era-high-school-social-life/
One of the enduring mysteries of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s decision to level last minute allegations of sexual misconduct against Judge Brett Kavanaugh is why her social media and online presence were so thoroughly scrubbed prior to her charges against Kavanaugh becoming public.
Although internet sleuths have tracked down a few photos and articles from Dr. Blasey Ford’s professional output, she effectively ghosted herself prior to going public – a very unusual move for someone who requested
and anticipated anonymity from the Democrats through whom she leveled the charges against Judge Kavanaugh.
The ghosting of Christine Blasey Ford was so thorough that her high school alma mater, the prestigious all-girl Holton Arms School, even pulled the yearbooks for the years during which she was a student, when a teenage Brett Kavanaugh allegedly attacked her.
However, one prescient, and as yet anonymous, blogger downloaded copies of the yearbooks and posted key pages that describe the social life of “Chrissy” Blasey and her social set.
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
how are her allegations "last minute"
Kavanaugh was nominated on July 9th
When did Blasey Ford first discuss this allegation with her congressperson
She talked to her congressperson in July and a letter was in Feinsteins possession on July 30th
-
According to Straw Man, presumption of innocence is an anachronistic concept from a bygone era. He prefers the Chinese legal system, where prosecutors and judges are on the same side of the bench, government-appointed lawyers don't utter a word during the trial other than "Yes, your honor" or "No, your honor" and the defendant somehow has to produce proof to discredit what the secret police manufactured against the accused because it's politically necessary.
According to me you're liar and fucking moron (two things you have in common with Trump)
Don't attribute things to me that I haven't said
-
According to me you're liar and fucking moron (two things you have in common with Trump)
Don't attribute things to me that I haven't said
Nice comeback. Turd
-
According to me you're liar and fucking moron (two things you have in common with Trump)
Don't attribute things to me that I haven't said
Nice meltdown you lying piece of shit. You've had Kavanaugh guilty and his accuser truthful since the start of the thread, with proof for neither. That's the Chinese-Russian legal system in a nutshell. Go live over there if you love a corrupt legal system that much.
-
Nice comeback. Turd
He's easily the worst poster on this site, and that's saying something on a forum with the likes of Marty Champions and Brian Poulos. He can't even write a single sentence without typos or butchering half the nouns because he's hyperventilating so hard.
(https://www.newsbusters.org/s3/files/styles/blog_body-100/s3/images/cnnsept19.jpg?itok=-qjwTqsd)
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/09/19/cnn-gives-virtually-no-air-time-pro-kavanaugh-evidence (https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/09/19/cnn-gives-virtually-no-air-time-pro-kavanaugh-evidence)
-
According to me you're liar and fucking moron (two things you have in common with Trump)
Don't attribute things to me that I haven't said
Can you prove you didn't say those things?
-
Can you prove you didn't say those things?
Haha. Owned by his own insane liberal legal acrobatics.
-
How to poison public opinion against someone in under 2 weeks, with no proven claims and massive support from the press:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html)
Feinstein, Gillibrand, Hirono, other Dem heavyweights quiet on Ellison claims:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/feinstein-other-dems-largely-silent-on-abuse-claims-against-keith-ellison.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/feinstein-other-dems-largely-silent-on-abuse-claims-against-keith-ellison.html)
-
How to poison public opinion against someone in under 2 weeks, with no proven claims and massive support from the press:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html)
Feinstein, Gillibrand, Hirono, other Dem heavyweights quiet on Ellison claims:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/feinstein-other-dems-largely-silent-on-abuse-claims-against-keith-ellison.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/feinstein-other-dems-largely-silent-on-abuse-claims-against-keith-ellison.html)
Thought I read today Hirono was calling for Ellison to be investigated
-
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/politics/mazie-hirono-keith-ellison-cnntv/index.html
-
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/politics/mazie-hirono-keith-ellison-cnntv/index.html
Recent victim and ex-girlfriend of elected official accuses him of violence and posts a medical report to that effect publicly:
*Mazie Hirono does interview on CNN and mentions quickly at the end that the congressman should be investigated*
Anonymous liberal arts college professor makes unsubstantiated, virtually unprovable 36-year-old claim against a SCOTUS nominee at the end of his nomination without remembering the address or the year:
*Mazie Hirono and Kirsten Gillibrand hold a full court press conference for 20 minutes condemning all men in the United States, including the nominee*
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
-
The Left and their middle/upper-class white soldiers not waiting for Ford's testimony. Apparently she's too credible to need to talk about what she claimed against the judge, so they're asking for his ouster immediately ahead of time.
As usual, lots of 'diversity' in the protestors. A sea of white. Not a black or brown face to be found. ::)
The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China look at us and laugh. We can't even get a judge elected because a bunch of triggered left-wing pothead college students with backpacks and mocca lattes just found a new trendy idea, smearing and disqualifying respected judges with distinguished records because two drunken white women hazily claim to remember seeing his dick 35 years ago, without any proof or even a memory of where it happened or when. LOL.
Fuck it, only a war can rinse out the rot in our house.
protesters are looking for "hero" GOP lawmakers.
Some of the demonstrators came from Yale Law School, Kavanaugh's alma mater. Members of a group called Yale Law Students Demanding Better included Veronica Guerrero, who told law.com that more than 100 traveled from the Connecticut school to join the protest.
"We’re here to demand that the law does not marginalize groups that are already marginalized in broader society," she said as she and other students waited for a chance to speak with Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb. Sasse has been a frequent critic of President Donald Trump.
(https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2018/09/24/USAT/1eeefcbf-6a9b-4e51-b396-7ad01d0f5e2f-AFP_AFP_19E1RI.jpg?width=534&height=401&fit=bounds&auto=webp)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-arrests-made-capitol-during-kavanaugh-protests/1409906002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-arrests-made-capitol-during-kavanaugh-protests/1409906002/)
-
And the attempted high tech lynching continues.
10 Serious Problems With New Accusations Against Kavanaugh
ByRYAN SAAVEDRA
@REALSAAVEDRA
September 24, 2018
The New Yorker published new accusations on Sunday from a second woman who alleges that Judge Brett Kavanaugh acted sexually inappropriate towards her at a party during their college years.
Deborah Ramirez, 53, alleges that while she was at a Yale party, intoxicated to the point that she was on the ground in a "foggy" state "slurring" her words, Kavanaugh pulled his pants down and exposed himself to her.
The New Yorker report and a subsequent report from The New York Times both raise multiple red flags about the credibility of the allegations. Here are 10 key points compiled from both reports that raise serious questions about the claims:
1. The New Yorker could not find a single witness who could put Kavanaugh at the alleged party.
Buried more than 1,000 words into the report, Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer wrote:
The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.
2. The New York Times could not find a single person who could corroborate Ramirez's claims.
The New York Times likewise could not find a single witness to backup her allegations:
The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge.
3. The man accused of egging on Kavanaugh denied Ramirez's allegations and vouched for Kavanaugh's character.
Buried more than 1,400 words into The New Yorker story, Farrow and Mayer provide a quote from one of the men named by Ramirez:
One of the male classmates who Ramirez said egged on Kavanaugh denied any memory of the party. "I don’t think Brett would flash himself to Debbie, or anyone, for that matter," he said. Asked why he thought Ramirez was making the allegation, he responded, "I have no idea." The other male classmate who Ramirez said was involved in the incident commented, "I have zero recollection."
4. A third person that Ramirez claimed was at the party says she was not there for the alleged incident.
The classmate, who was not named, said that "she was not present at the incident."
5. Ramirez contacted her former classmates, asking about the incident, and admitted she was not sure that Kavanaugh was the male who exposed himself.
The Times' report states:
Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.
6. A woman who claims she was "best friends" with Ramirez says Ramirez never mentioned the story and initially said her friend's accusations against Kavanaugh might be "politically motivated."
Buried nearly 1,700 words into the New Yorker piece, the report states:
The former friend who was married to the male classmate alleged to be involved, and who signed the statement, said of Ramirez, “This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.” She said she hadn’t spoken with Ramirez for about ten years, but that the two women had been close all through college, and Kavanaugh had remained part of what she called their “larger social circle.” In an initial conversation with The New Yorker, she suggested that Ramirez may have been politically motivated. Later, she said that she did not know if this was the case.
7. Ramirez, just like Christine Blasey Ford, is a registered Democrat and is dedicated to leftist causes.
Farrow and Mayer note more than 1,800 words into their report that "Ramirez is a registered Democrat," noting that she "works toward human rights, social justice, and social change."
8. Ramirez wasn't even sure her memory was correct — until she spent six days going over it with her Democrat lawyer.
"In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty," the outlet reports. "After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh..."
The New Yorker waits for more than 2,100 words to inform readers that Ramirez's lawyer is "Stanley Garnett, a former Democratic district attorney in Boulder..."
9. Ramirez admits there are holes in her memory due to how much she drank at the party.
"She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident," The New Yorker report states in the second paragraph.
Ramirez said that at the party, where students were playing a drinking game, she "quickly became inebriated" because of the large amounts of alcohol she was consuming, adding that she became so intoxicated that she "was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words."
10. People who knew Ramirez after her time at Yale say that she never once mentioned the incident — until Kavanaugh's nomination was pending.
More than 1,500 words into the article, The New Yorker report states:
In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36229/10-serious-problems-new-accusations-against-ryan-saavedra
-
Nolte: Every Witness Named by Kavanaugh’s Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh
24 Sep 2018
The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaugh’s claim that nothing happened.
. . . .
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/24/every-witness-named-kavanaughs-accusers-sides-kavanaugh/
-
Nolte: Every Witness Named by Kavanaugh’s Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh
24 Sep 2018
The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaugh’s claim that nothing happened.
. . . .
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/24/every-witness-named-kavanaughs-accusers-sides-kavanaugh/
Liberals are the worst pos ever,. EVERY single case of their supposed evidence of abuse alswys turned out to crap.
-
The accusations made by Christine Ford and this female alumnus from Yale would not meet the minimum requirements for a district attorney to file charges, even in our triggered post-#MeToo environment. Vague memories and unsubstantiated allegations can be made against literally anyone: Your boss, your co-workers, your spouse, your roommates, anyone. The best the Left and its sponsors in the media and the Democrat party can do to buttress such claims is to disingenuously and preposterously insist that the people making such accusations should be believed because they were born female. They've said this with a straight face at press conferences and in interviews with the liberal press and TV networks in the past 2 weeks.
That is the definition of a police state. It's how things work in China to this very day, and how it worked in Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge terror state in Cambodia, Stalin's Russia, and Hitler's Germany, as well as any number of third world religious dictatorships in the Middle East and military juntas in Africa. An accusation is enough for anyone to be arrested and often convicted in those places.
That is what the Left wants and is aggressively pushing for in the United States, and they're succeeding because good White people aren't standing up to it with counterprotests and demonstrations in favor of this good man. Letters from women who knew him don't mean shit. Where are they when it comes to doing interviews on TV or holding press conferences to condemn the people besmirching his reputation? At home, scared. Asians, Natives, Blacks, Jews, Pacific Islanders all don't care about this type of thing and are quiet on the matter. They can't be relied on.
-
There can be no accord with the Left. They are the enemy. They want to turn us into a 3rd world shithole where they can continue to rule from well guarded enclaves while the rest of us fend for ourselves against the screaming hordes. Trump called them out and unmasked them for who they are. They aren't Americans as we understood it. They all need to go.....
From the twitterverse.....
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are considering using female staffers to question Dr. Christine Blasey Ford at the hearing set for Thursday, but her attorneys pushed back.
Might she now cancel completely now that she's successfully stalled long enough to let the Democrat/Socialist Social Justice Warrior find new accusers?
Committee Republicans "reserve the option to have female staff attorneys, who are sensitive to the particulars of Dr. Ford’s allegations and are experienced investigators, question both witnesses," committee chair Republican Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said in a letter to Ford’s lawyers Friday, according to The New York Times.
Ford's lawyers only want her to be questioned by senators, reported CNN. All 11 of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Republican members are male.
-
There can be no accord with the Left. They are the enemy. They want to turn us into a 3rd world shithole where they can continue to rule from well guarded enclaves while the rest of us fend for ourselves against the screaming hordes. Trump called them out and unmasked them for who they are. They aren't Americans as we understood it. They all need to go.....
From the twitterverse.....
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are considering using female staffers to question Dr. Christine Blasey Ford at the hearing set for Thursday, but her attorneys pushed back.
Might she now cancel completely now that she's successfully stalled long enough to let the Democrat/Socialist Social Justice Warrior find new accusers?
Committee Republicans "reserve the option to have female staff attorneys, who are sensitive to the particulars of Dr. Ford’s allegations and are experienced investigators, question both witnesses," committee chair Republican Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said in a letter to Ford’s lawyers Friday, according to The New York Times.
Ford's lawyers only want her to be questioned by senators, reported CNN. All 11 of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Republican members are male.
Smart guy.
Also, she dropped her condition that the FBI conduct an investigation. Why? I thought that was the entire pivot of her case. How convenient.
-
I think after hearing that "THE FUCKING FBI DOES'NT INVESTIGATE SHIT LIKE THIS YOU CRAZY BITCH" 9 billion times, she dropped it. Now its trying to make the Repubs look like their badgering her. Nothing Trump has done thus far has been earth shaking as far as President...but sealing the Supreme Court up for a generation so we can keep the batshit leftists from legislating from the bench because they can't pass enough laws or control enough legislatures......is the greatest thing ever.
-
I think after hearing that "THE FUCKING FBI DOES'NT INVESTIGATE SHIT LIKE THIS YOU CRAZY BITCH" 9 billion times, she dropped it. Now its trying to make the Repubs look like their badgering her. Nothing Trump has done thus far has been earth shaking as far as President...but sealing the Supreme Court up for a generation so we can keep the batshit leftists from legislating from the bench because they can't pass enough laws or control enough legislatures......is the greatest thing ever.
she dropped it "for now" because she knew has no power and the Senate would just plow forward with the vote
-
she dropped it "for now" because she knew has no power and the Senate would just plow forward with the vote
Yeah, everyone in the country can get U.S. senators to offer to fly across the country to conduct a private interview with them because flying out to Washington all expenses paid and with heavy security to support your unprovable and proven libels against a federal judge might inconvenience their dayjob, get them to do a closed-door Q & A session with only 1 camera, handpick who does your questions, and demand that the person you're accusing not even be in the room. On top of $500,000 gifted through gofundme directly into their checking account. That's the textbook definition of powerlessness alright.
Remember when you and me did that shit? That was awesome. I love my new boat and newfound fame. How's your beach house in CA doing?
-
Yeah, everyone in the country can get U.S. senators to offer to fly across the country to conduct a private interview with them because flying out to Washington all expenses paid and with heavy security to support your unprovable and proven libels against a federal judge might inconvenience their dayjob, get them to do a closed-door Q & A session with only 1 camera, handpick who does your questions, and demand that the person you're accusing not even be in the room. On top of $500,000 gifted through gofundme directly into their checking account. That's the textbook definition of powerlessness alright.
Remember when you and me did that shit? That was awesome. I love my new boat and newfound fame. How's your beach house in CA doing?
You forgot one thing in your narrative.
the Senate is not even going to ask the only eye witness to testify
not sure what the other nonsense is that you posted.
-
You forgot one thing in your narrative.
the Senate is not even going to ask the only eye witness to testify
not sure what the other nonsense is that you posted.
There is no eye-witness. There's a mentally-deranged and deeply confused 53 year old white college professor with wants fame and money off the back of an innocent man while making a mockery of the country's SCOTUS nomination committee and the media in general. And her dung beetle followers on getbig and Twitter.
-
There is no eye-witness. There's a mentally-deranged and deeply confused 53 year old white college professor with wants fame and money off the back of an innocent man while making a mockery of the country's SCOTUS nomination committee and the media in general. And her dung beetle followers on getbig and Twitter.
she said someone was there
all that person has to do is go under oath and say he wasn't there
that would actually help Kavanaugh so I'm sure you'd have no problem with that
-
she said someone was there
all that person has to do is go under oath and say he wasn't there
that would actually help Kavanaugh so I'm sure you'd have no problem with that
But that person has no proof, either, if they even exist. I can get five people to say you molested me when I was 14. That mean it's true?
-
There can be no accord with the Left. They are the enemy. They want to turn us into a 3rd world shithole where they can continue to rule from well guarded enclaves while the rest of us fend for ourselves against the screaming hordes. Trump called them out and unmasked them for who they are. They aren't Americans as we understood it. They all need to go.....
From the twitterverse.....
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are considering using female staffers to question Dr. Christine Blasey Ford at the hearing set for Thursday, but her attorneys pushed back.
Might she now cancel completely now that she's successfully stalled long enough to let the Democrat/Socialist Social Justice Warrior find new accusers?
Committee Republicans "reserve the option to have female staff attorneys, who are sensitive to the particulars of Dr. Ford’s allegations and are experienced investigators, question both witnesses," committee chair Republican Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said in a letter to Ford’s lawyers Friday, according to The New York Times.
Ford's lawyers only want her to be questioned by senators, reported CNN. All 11 of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Republican members are male.
Welcome back. :)
-
Welcome back. :)
This disgusting story has brought the great ones out from retirement just to contribute some common sense and sanity to the equation. 8)
-
I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.
Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.
-
This disgusting story has brought the great ones out from retirement just to contribute some common sense and sanity to the equation. 8)
Yep. :)
-
I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.
Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.
I haven't watched it yet, but how is he supposed to know what is motivating someone to lie about him?
-
I haven't watched it yet, but how is he supposed to know what is motivating someone to lie about him?
That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.
-
That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.
Thanks. I'll check it out.
-
she said someone was there
all that person has to do is go under oath and say he wasn't there
that would actually help Kavanaugh so I'm sure you'd have no problem with that
4 "witnesses", 4 denials. LOL
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/23/fourth-supposed-witness-kavanaugh-accusers-alleged-assault-says-didnt-happen/
-
4 "witnesses", 4 denials. LOL
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/23/fourth-supposed-witness-kavanaugh-accusers-alleged-assault-says-didnt-happen/
The case against him is non-existent. Tucker Carlson just had a female guest at the opening of his show that said that when it comes to sexual assault allegations, the burden of proof being on the accuser no longer applies and men should have to prove themselves innocent or face the consequences. I'm not even kidding. Even he was stunned and speechless. I recommend you guys watch this episode (it's on right now and play against at 12 ET 9 PT) because he went on the strongest offensive against this culture of identity politics and man-hating rum amok I've ever seen on any Fox host's show.
-
This really changes the reason for men videotaping their relations with women, haha....have to do it to cover your ass now from these liars. 24/7/365 cameras going from now on. ;D
-
The case against him is non-existent. Tucker Carlson just had a female guest at the opening of his show that said that when it comes to sexual assault allegations, the burden of proof being on the accuser no longer applies and men should have to prove themselves innocent or face the consequences. I'm not even kidding. Even he was stunned and speechless. I recommend you guys watch this episode (it's on right now and play against at 12 ET 9 PT) because he went on the strongest offensive against this culture of identity politics and man-hating rum amok I've ever seen on any Fox host's show.
These people have lost their minds. :-\
-
Quite possibly the best episode of TCT I've ever seen, and I've been watching him since he started at CNN in the late 1990s.
His opening monologue spoke for so many of us out there...I felt every word of it. He was legitimately enraged at what's happening to this judge and America in general due to the lefty's endless chipping away at the Bill of Rights with its pickax of political correctness. Highly recommend watching it through, because he destroys Republicans as well.
-
I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.
Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.
I saw it as well. I got the feeling he was coached to stick to talking points. He did a LOT of repeating. If he is telling the truth, I think his handlers made a poor decision. I think several posters could have handled that interview much better, coming off genuine, honest and likable in the end. He did not lose one supporter with that interview but I highly doubt he gained any. There was nothing there to latch on to.
-
That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.
Should have read this before my previous post, you said it better
-
But that person has no proof, either, if they even exist. I can get five people to say you molested me when I was 14. That mean it's true?
I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.
-
I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.
Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.
Looks like if you're a male and in the spotlight...you are fucked these days. More than 35 years ago, a women tried to molest me. I'd go after her except that it is too late because she is dead now. My step-dad caught her in the act and could have been a witness but for the fact that he died in the '70's. No matter, I survived.
-
Libs in the Congress failed to derail the Kavanaugh nomination through conventional means and scrutiny of his legal record, and he passed every FBI background check, so now they've bet their entire desperate battle on the tried-and-tested method of pulling some obscure woman out of the garbage heap, dusting her off, and begging her for ANYTHING that could save their pathetic last-minute attempts to block a conservative from the court. I predict this will not only fail but blow up so hard in their faces that it'll knock down the rotten MeToo 'movement' whose shaky scaffolding can't survive a firm and hard rejection by the American people with a conscience and a brain in their heads. Of course, CNN just found its new topic for a week.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html)
Anything is possible, but I suspect it will take more than this fiasco to take down the Me Too folks. They are still on a roll.
-
Why doesn't it surprise me that Kavanaugh's accuser is a "Professor" from the Bay Area (Palo Alto) LMFAO..hahaha!
You wish you could afford to live in Palo Alto. Chances are you couldn't get a job cleaning the toilets at the farm (otherwise known as Standford University).
-
Lawyers made up the paper "presented" to the Democrats. Just BS. When Kavanaugh is in the Supreme court do you think he will remember what the Democrats did to him?
And if he does. what then?
-
A bunch of men (?) weighing in on a possible sexual assault on a woman/girl. ::) Do you think anything we have to say would be taken seriously? Better buy yourself a cock-cage and give the key to your mom (not your priest). You could be next one to burn.
-
A bunch of men (?) weighing in on a possible sexual assault on a woman/girl. ::) Do you think anything we have to say would be taken seriously? Better buy yourself a cock-cage and give the key to your mom (not your priest). You could be next one to burn.
So women are supposed to just be allowed to make up any allegation at all and automatically we are suppose dto believe it? Especially considering the 3 alleged witnesses - SHe NAMED - all say it never happed? GTFO
-
-
Quite possibly the best episode of TCT I've ever seen, and I've been watching him since he started at CNN in the late 1990s.
His opening monologue spoke for so many of us out there...I felt every word of it. He was legitimately enraged at what's happening to this judge and America in general due to the lefty's endless chipping away at the Bill of Rights with its pickax of political correctness. Highly recommend watching it through, because he destroys Republicans as well.
This!
-
I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.
Lol, too mean.... ;D
-
So women are supposed to just be allowed to make up any allegation at all and automatically we are suppose dto believe it? Especially considering the 3 alleged witnesses - SHe NAMED - all say it never happed? GTFO
Hope you realize my post was meant to be sarcastic.
If Ford is making this up and she sticks to her story under oath and is found out, she's risking going to jail.
Speaking of jail time, my son-in-law just told me that Cosby got 3 to 10 years in prison. The judge denied bail pending an appeal. Sad.
-
It seems prime got his new shipment of Depends last night and went on a bit of a rampage in my thread.
For the convenience of others and to keep the thread from becoming cluttered, can I ask you to condense all your replies into one post? It's pretty easy to do, just scroll down the page below the reply box and quote the people you want to reply to in one post. That way we don't have 8 replies that could've been contained in one. Thanks, gramps. And you're still an old pedophile. ;)
I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.
I doubt it'll be anywhere as hilarious as these two back-to-back frustrated old man meltdowns
Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! Move on fuck-head, you'll so quickly be forgotten, it will be like you never existed. Amen.
Kwon3 relishes calling folks pedophiles. It's all an enormous Getbig joke to him. He is disgustingly subhuman. Call him on it and he counters that he's just pulling your chain. Bullshit! "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" He is obsessed...and mentally deeply disturbed.
-
It seems prime got his new shipment of Depends last night and went on a bit of a rampage in my thread.
For the convenience of others and to keep the thread from becoming cluttered, can I ask you to condense all your replies into one post? It's pretty easy to do, just scroll down the page below the reply box and quote the people you want to reply to in one post. That way we don't have 8 replies that could've been contained in one. Thanks, gramps. And you're still an old pedophile. ;)
I doubt it'll be anywhere as hilarious as these two back-to-back frustrated old man meltdowns
Say something that would make me want to do anything for you. I owe you no favors. Good to know you don't like clutter in 'your' threads.
-
Say something that would make me want to do anything for you. I owe you no favors. Good to know you don't like clutter in 'your' threads.
It was a suggestion, not a demand. If you want to post like an asshole and ignore etiquette, be my guest. It confirms everyone's low opinion of you on here as a child-fiddling dementia-stricken liberal imbecile who shares everything that's on his mind regardless of whether people want to read it or not, and fucks up threads with cluttered posts to boot. And yes, it is my thread, since I made it. I realize a communist doesn't understand that concept, since you think everyone should own everything everyone else has. If you don't like it, make your own.
-
Christine Ford, through her lawyers, are now objecting to their very condition that they demanded in the first place: A non-senator female lawyer to ask her the questions that would normally be asked by the committee, as was done in the Hill case (and in all cases, normally).
She's now claiming she wouldn't be comfortable talking to a prosecutor because she doesn't feel she's on "trial".
See? Blackmailers doing what blackmailers do best: Changing the rules as many times as they see fit to avoid taking responsibility for their own repulsive actions. Republicans dropped the ball. They should never have accommodated her in any way and simple done an up or down vote last week. Pandering to liars never works.
https://www.infowars.com/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/ (https://www.infowars.com/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/)
-
Haven't paid attention - did they give in to Kavanaugh going first and not being able to defend himself after her testimony?
-
Haven't paid attention - did they give in to Kavanaugh going first and not being able to defend himself after her testimony?
No, they wouldn't budge on that unprecedented and ridiculous condition or the FBI investigation.
Other than those two, they've given everything and anything she asked for and she's still not happy.
Because this is like a kid holding his parents' keys over an overpass and threatening to let them drop unless he gets taken to Disney Land. It's extortion plain and simple, played out on an adult scale and in front of the whole world. It's shocking and sad for elected officials to pander to a faceless white nobody who clearly wanted free money and attention (she's at nearly $1 million in gofundme funds now).
-
Joe Biden stating unequivocally in 1991 at the Thomas hearing that the FBI does not reach conclusions about guilt when used for SCOTUS nominations, contradicting his statements in 2018 stating that such investigations are "essential" for establishing fitness:
In other passages available on YouTube, he claims the presumption of innocence is on Clarence Thomas's part, not Hill's.
Two glaring examples of hypocrisy and dishonesty on the part of the Left, yet again. Contradicts ALL their statements in 2018 in the Kavanaugh hearing.
-
Joe Biden stating unequivocally in 1991 at the Thomas hearing that the FBI does not reach conclusions about guilt when used for SCOTUS nominations, contradicting his statements in 2018 stating that such investigations are "essential" for establishing fitness:
In other passages available on YouTube, he claims the presumption of innocence is on Clarence Thomas's part, not Hill's.
Two glaring examples of hypocrisy and dishonesty on the part of the Left, yet again. Contradicts ALL their statements in 2018 in the Kavanaugh hearing.
Hypocrite.
-
These people are dangerous.
Sen. Chris Coons: Burden of proof lies with Kavanaugh to prove innocence
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Sen. Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat, drew double-takes on the right Monday after insisting that the burden of proof lies with Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to prove his innocence.
Mr. Coons said that Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez “have nothing to gain” and have put themselves “at legal risk” by accusing Mr. Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in his teen years.
“It is Judge Kavanaugh who is seeking a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court and who I think now bears the burden of disproving these allegations,” said Mr. Coons in a Monday interview on MSNBC, “rather than Dr. Ford and Deborah Ramirez who should be dismissed with slanderous accusations.”
Townhall.com’s Guy Benson called the argument “just wild,” while the Media Research Center blasted it as the “Dem idea of justice.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/25/chris-coons-burden-proof-lies-brett-kavanaugh-prov/
-
Christine Ford, through her lawyers, are now objecting to their very condition that they demanded in the first place: A non-senator female lawyer to ask her the questions that would normally be asked by the committee, as was done in the Hill case (and in all cases, normally).
She's now claiming she wouldn't be comfortable talking to a prosecutor because she doesn't feel she's on "trial".
See? Blackmailers doing what blackmailers do best: Changing the rules as many times as they see fit to avoid taking responsibility for their own repulsive actions. Republicans dropped the ball. They should never have accommodated her in any way and simple done an up or down vote last week. Pandering to liars never works.
https://www.infowars.com/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/ (https://www.infowars.com/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/)
From what I understand having no outside lawyers was a request. She is still set to testify Thursday
-
From what I understand having no outside lawyers was a request. She is still set to testify Thursday
Let's hope for once she actually goes through with what she says. The senate, the SCOTUS, Kavanaugh, the media, and just about everyone in the administration is fed up with the mind games. They just want this over, positive or negative.
Also, good article on this situation:
https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-can-innocent-even-christine-blasey-ford-isnt-lying/ (https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-can-innocent-even-christine-blasey-ford-isnt-lying/)
-
Let's hope for once she actually goes through with what she says. The senate, the SCOTUS, Kavanaugh, the media, and just about everyone in the administration is fed up with the mind games. They just want this over, positive or negative.
Also, good article on this situation:
https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-can-innocent-even-christine-blasey-ford-isnt-lying/ (https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-can-innocent-even-christine-blasey-ford-isnt-lying/)
It is an interesting perspective. Its a little outdated. Since that was written, one of the women who signed the letter of support that Kavenaugh was a stellar guy, found out Brett and some of his friends had written notations in their yearbook insinuating she was at the very least, "easy". He graduated in 1983. Drinking age was 21 in 1982 so her statement of no underage or illegal drinking is false. She has agreed to testify under oath.
-
I was surprised to hear Kavanaugh volunteer, that he was a virgin through highschool and "many many years" after that. I mean why even go there.. not a guy out there believes it.
-
I was surprised to hear Kavanaugh volunteer, that he was a virgin through highschool and "many many years" after that. I mean why even go there.. not a guy out there believes it.
One of the many problems I found with the interview and why I wrote a negative assessment of it shortly after I saw it on Fox.
-
This whole fiasco reeks of dishonesty.
-
I was surprised to hear Kavanaugh volunteer, that he was a virgin through highschool and "many many years" after that. I mean why even go there.. not a guy out there believes it.
You, I, and others might be incredulous; but if it's true, he gets to state it. If it ain't true, he has invited a panoply of folks to respond; perhaps some are male.
(http://media1.giphy.com/media/gZt1QEnzWNeSY/200.gif)
-
If men and women are equal, then this picture and its associated hashtags should start trending on Twitter and be accepted by the same people that use the #IStandWithChristineFord and #BelieveWomen and #MeToo tags, right? Wanna bet you'd be savaged, verbally brutalized and blocked by almost every one of them if you posted it? Because that's what I've noticed on the few men brave enough to experiment with it so far on the feeds discussing the Kavanaugh situation.
Liberals, as always, only believe their perception of the world is right one and anyone else has no right to a voice. They brook no disagreement and give no quarter. They're monsters, crooks, sociopaths.
(https://i.postimg.cc/YSLMzfwH/Men.png)
-
this whole fiasco has really turned me away from all media outlets for the past couple of weeks.
just like the "nuclear option" - this will come back and bite the obstructionist democrats
-
I was surprised to hear Kavanaugh volunteer, that he was a virgin through highschool and "many many years" after that. I mean why even go there.. not a guy out there believes it.
(https://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/mm/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fewedit.files.wordpress.com%2F2015%2F12%2F6c_2_20r.jpg%3Fw%3D612&w=1000&q=70)
-
(https://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/mm/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fewedit.files.wordpress.com%2F2015%2F12%2F6c_2_20r.jpg%3Fw%3D612&w=1000&q=70)
lol :D
-
The Truth About Kavanaugh
-
WASHINGTON — Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford have given the Senate Judiciary Committee sworn declarations from four individuals, including her husband, who say she told them in recent years that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh attacked her when they were in high school.
The signed documents — from Ford's husband, Russell, and three friends — were sent to the committee on Tuesday night and obtained by NBC News Wednesday morning, the day before Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify before the committee about the allegations. The story was first reported by USA Today.
Uh huh. The man who has sex with her every night and three best friends just told you that everything she's said in the past two weeks is true. Why even bother holding a vote? The top references in the United States just came forward to defend her claims.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/kavanaugh-accuser-ford-provides-four-sworn-declarations-supporting-her-allegation-n913216 (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/kavanaugh-accuser-ford-provides-four-sworn-declarations-supporting-her-allegation-n913216)
-
You c a n n o t make this stuff up.
-
Uh huh. The man who has sex with her every night and three best friends just told you that everything she's said in the past two weeks is true. Why even bother holding a vote? The top references in the United States just came forward to defend her claims.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/kavanaugh-accuser-ford-provides-four-sworn-declarations-supporting-her-allegation-n913216 (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/kavanaugh-accuser-ford-provides-four-sworn-declarations-supporting-her-allegation-n913216)
This is one of those facepalm times.
-
This Kavanaugh matter is like an inverted version of the film The Contender.
(https://img.moviepostershop.com/the-contender-movie-poster-2000-1020231085.jpg)
-
Nah, it's more like Ricochet.
Ricochet is a 1991 American action crime thriller film, directed by Russell Mulcahy and starring Denzel Washington, John Lithgow, Ice-T, Kevin Pollak, and Lindsay Wagner. The film details a struggle between a Los Angeles attorney (Washington) and a vengeful criminal (Lithgow) he arrested and caused to be convicted when he was previously a cop.
In 1983, rookie Los Angeles police officer and law student Nicholas Styles (Denzel Washington) meets his future wife Alice (Victoria Dillard). He drifts away from his childhood friend Odessa (Ice-T), who is drifting into a life of crime in South Central Los Angeles. Styles and his partner Larry Doyle (Kevin Pollak) patrol a carnival, where they encounter hitman Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow) and his servile accomplice Kim (Josh Evans). Styles catches Blake at gunpoint and is forced into a standoff when Blake takes a hostage. After stripping his equipment and uniform off, Styles uses a hidden gun in his athletic supporter, shooting Blake in the knee and subduing him. The incident is caught by an amateur videographer and is shown on television, making Styles a hero. He and Doyle are subsequently promoted to Detective, while Blake is sent to prison.
Eight years later, Styles has moved on to be an Assistant District Attorney, is married to Alice, and has two daughters. At the same time, Blake has degenerated into further violence fighting against the Caucasian Brotherhood. He also strikes a deal with the leader of the gang to plot an escape. Having been incarcerated with Blake, Kim is paroled and plans to assist in Blake's escape and revenge. Blake and the AB members stage a violent and deadly prison escape during a parole hearing, which only Blake and the AB leader survive. Blake murders the gang leader and burns his corpse.
Styles finds Odessa, who has become a major drug-dealer in the neighborhood. Blake and Kim later kill the city councilman, staging his death to appear as a suicide. Styles is abducted by Blake and Kim outside his home and is held hostage in an empty swimming pool for several days. Blake and Kim regularly inject Styles with heroin and cocaine while engaging in arm wrestling. Blake hires a blonde white female prostitute Wanda (Linda Dona) to have sex with Styles. As she strips naked, Wanda ignores Styles' weak objections and proceeds to rape him as Blake records the incident on video. After Blake and Kim deposit Styles' unconscious body on the steps of City Hall, Alice overhears Styles' phone conservation and thinks he cheated on her with a prostitute. Styles witnesses a video of Blake going up to his daughters' room and holding a hatchet over them just before the tape cuts out. Terrified and enraged, Styles heads to the park, sees a black-clad figure who is a clown, and holds him at gunpoint. After the tape has been substituted with the video recording of Styles' rape, he vehemently protests his innocence and Blake's complicity to District Attorney Priscilla Brimleigh (Lindsay Wagner), who suspends Styles. After receiving evidence of Blake's obsession, Styles and Doyle go to the bookstore that night, and Styles beats information out of the owner. Blake ambushes Doyle, fatally wounds him in the alley, and escapes.
Classic frame job on (ironically) an Assistant D.A., often the precursor to judgeship.
-
Nuts. This really is a moral issue at this point. If those spineless Republicans allow this political terrorism to succeed, they are going to lose big time in November IMO.
7:48 PM — Someone else claims that Kavanaugh and Judge raped a girl on a boat in Rhode Island, then got beaten up by her friends. The man making this claim calls Trump “the parasite that occupies the White House.”
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/26/live-updates-avenatti-circus-throws-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-into-chaos/
-
Nah, it's more like Ricochet.
Ricochet is a 1991 American action crime thriller film, directed by Russell Mulcahy and starring Denzel Washington, John Lithgow, Ice-T, Kevin Pollak, and Lindsay Wagner. The film details a struggle between a Los Angeles attorney (Washington) and a vengeful criminal (Lithgow) he arrested and caused to be convicted when he was previously a cop.
n 1983, rookie Los Angeles police officer and law student Nicholas Styles (Denzel Washington) meets his future wife Alice (Victoria Dillard). He drifts away from his childhood friend Odessa (Ice-T), who is drifting into a life of crime in South Central Los Angeles. Styles and his partner Larry Doyle (Kevin Pollak) patrol a carnival, where they encounter hitman Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow) and his servile accomplice Kim (Josh Evans). Styles catches Blake at gunpoint and is forced into a standoff when Blake takes a hostage. After stripping his equipment and uniform off, Styles uses a hidden gun in his athletic supporter, shooting Blake in the knee and subduing him. The incident is caught by an amateur videographer and is shown on television, making Styles a hero. He and Doyle are subsequently promoted to Detective, while Blake is sent to prison.
Eight years later, Styles has moved on to be an Assistant District Attorney, is married to Alice, and has two daughters. At the same time, Blake has degenerated into further violence fighting against the Caucasian Brotherhood. He also strikes a deal with the leader of the gang to plot an escape. Having been incarcerated with Blake, Kim is paroled and plans to assist in Blake's escape and revenge. Blake and the AB members stage a violent and deadly prison escape during a parole hearing, which only Blake and the AB leader survive. Blake murders the gang leader and burns his corpse.
Styles finds Odessa, who has become a major drug-dealer in the neighborhood. Blake and Kim later kill the city councilman, staging his death to appear as a suicide. Styles is abducted by Blake and Kim outside his home and is held hostage in an empty swimming pool for several days. Blake and Kim regularly inject Styles with heroin and cocaine while engaging in arm wrestling. Blake hires a blonde white female prostitute Wanda (Linda Dona) to have sex with Styles. As she strips naked, Wanda ignores Styles' weak objections and proceeds to rape him as Blake records the incident on video. After Blake and Kim deposit Styles' unconscious body on the steps of City Hall, Alice overhears Styles' phone conservation and thinks he cheated on her with a prostitute. Styles witnesses a video of Blake going up to his daughters' room and holding a hatchet over them just before the tape cuts out. Terrified and enraged, Styles heads to the park, sees a black-clad figure who is a clown, and holds him at gunpoint. After the tape has been substituted with the video recording of Styles' rape, he vehemently protests his innocence and Blake's complicity to District Attorney Priscilla Brimleigh (Lindsay Wagner), who suspends Styles. After receiving evidence of Blake's obsession, Styles and Doyle go to the bookstore that night, and Styles beats information out of the owner. Blake ambushes Doyle, fatally wounds him in the alley, and escapes.
Classic frame job on (ironically) an Assistant D.A., often the precursor to judgeship.
Good movie.
-
Trump rakes the liberal media, the Kavanaugh 'accusers', Michael Avenatti, and the Democrats over the coals today after a press conference.
-
Senator Blumenthal (D-CT) ups the ante and adds fuel to the liberal inferno by claiming Brett Kavanaugh "seemingly" raped a woman as well now (at 3:14).
The left is flailing madly, throwing every insane accusation possible to try to block the vote on Friday. Why would they do that if they were confident in "Dr" Ford's testimony? They're trying everything and anything to stop this guy.
-
(https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42559010_2238226059521311_393651568202743808_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&oh=5c0f0c74e5a40da0df5b23bf1d7c4d4e&oe=5C6306A9)
-
That's such a manly haircut. For a woman who prides herself on being as womanly as a bulldyke can get, she sure tries her best to sound and look like us (hairstyle, plain makeup, deep voice, manly suits, etc). Bet she uses penis-shaped objects with her girlfriend, too. Why, I thought you didn't need us? ;D
-
2 men just came forward and said it was they who were at the party - not Kavanaugh.
Psycho dingbat lady is all screwed up
-
Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison said Wednesday he's requesting a House Ethics Committee investigation into the allegation of physical abuse from an ex-girlfriend that is clouding his bid for attorney general and complicating Democrats' push to investigate allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Karen Monahan said last month Ellison dragged her off a bed by her feet while screaming obscenities at her. She claimed to have video footage of the 2016 incident but has declined to release it. Ellison, a longtime and fiercely liberal congressman from Minneapolis and deputy chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has denied it ever happened.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ellison-seeks-house-ethics-investigation-abuse-allegation-192955261--election.html
-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html
:D
-
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6212551/Brett-Kavanaughs-accuser-history-money-troubles-unpaid-taxes.html
-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html
:D
Icing on the cake.
-
Never trust a liberal
-
She's supposedly horrified of flying yet takes trips all over the world.
-
She's supposedly horrified of flying yet takes trips all over the world.
Didn't know she was offered her testimony could take place on her home turf...
-
Didn't know she was offered her testimony could take place on her home turf...
Even though the entire world knew.
Also doesn't know who paid for her polygraph. Talked to Washington Post. Doesn't remember whether she showed her therapist notes to the Washington Post two months ago.
-
When asked if she spoke to anyone about the alleged rape attempt between the time her letter was published and the time she spoke with her attorneys, she answered she spoke to no one about this during this time.
When asked who recommended she hire an attorney, she said the people she spoke with about the alleged rape attempt after her letter was published recommended she hire an attorney.
WTF?
-
The over the top grandstanding by the Democrats is cringe-worth.
Graham summed it all up - something happened with this woman.
When you have a passionate accusation with what will be followed by a passionate denial, you go to the rules of law.
Since there is no corraboration, it should be done.
-
When asked if she spoke to anyone about the alleged rape attempt between the time her letter was published and the time she spoke with her attorneys, she answered she spoke to no one about this during this time.
When asked who recommended she hire an attorney, she said the people she spoke with about the alleged rape attempt after her letter was published recommended she hire an attorney.
WTF?
The beach people ;D
-
some people I don't know said to go talk to lawyer and then some people I don't know paid for my polygraph and I don't know which year/Month/date/house it took place but the room had a bed on the right side of it and 2-4 people of indeterminate gender may have been there and raped me ....or didn't rape me..but did something awful so because Brett Kavanaugh is an enemy of the Left and I hate Trump...yeah that will do.
-
some people I don't know said to go talk to lawyer and then some people I don't know paid for my polygraph and I don't know which year/Month/date/house it took place but the room had a bed on the right side of it and 2-4 people of indeterminate gender may have been there and raped me ....or didn't rape me..but did something awful so because Brett Kavanaugh is an enemy of the Left and I hate Trump...yeah that will do.
The people on the beach ;D
-
-
Democrats are evil. I hope they all lose in November.
-
Democrats are evil. I hope they all get their asses kicked in November.
-
*Applause* Nailed it.
-
Democrats are evil. I hope they all lose in November.
who cares what you think
you should worry about your own country
-
The over the top grandstanding by the Democrats is cringe-worth.
Graham summed it all up - something happened with this woman.
When you have a passionate accusation with what will be followed by a passionate denial, you go to the rules of law.
Since there is no corraboration, it should be done.
Too bad the Republican didn't have the balls to actually call the alleged eye witness testify
It would have been a lot more convincing to have him show and and say under oath under penalty of perjury that this didn't happen.
Since the Republicans chose not to do this it will simply come down to who each individual senator believes is telling the truth and they only need to flip a few Republicans to send this guy home.
If he is placed on the court and the Dems win the election they can always open up an new investigation.
-
who cares what you think
you should worry about your own country
You care, obviously, and in a very creepy kind of way.
And I'm not worried.
-
You care, obviously, and in a very creepy kind of way.
And I'm not worried.
Right? Friggin creepy weirdo.
-
Senator Grassley was just spectacular during this whole ordeal.
Took his lumps early with the press, gave in to the accuser's requests as a show of empathy. Put just enough heat on during the hearing.
Basically was the glue that kept everything together. Just solid leadership all around. Really impressive how he walked that tight rope.
I just can't imagine Kavanaugh not getting the nod after today but as the old saying goes..."crazier things have happened"
It's political suicide as a Republican to vote against him after his strong showing.
-
Too bad the Republican didn't have the balls to actually call the alleged eye witness testify
It would have been a lot more convincing to have him show and and say under oath under penalty of perjury that this didn't happen.
Since the Republicans chose not to do this it will simply come down to who each individual senator believes is telling the truth and they only need to flip a few Republicans to send this guy home.
If he is placed on the court and the Dems win the election they can always open up an new investigation.
If the Democrats were truly concerned about Ford, they would have started the process when they became aware of it, and proper time would have permitted a better process.
But they were only doing this for political purposes, and it's obvious to anyone who posses any rational thought.
-
Fuckstein screwed the pooch on this one, thought she was going to pull some "aha!" out and it burned up in her face. What kind of person sits on info like that for so long?
-
*Applause* Nailed it.
Yep
-
BREAKING: Source close to Sen. Manchin (D-WV) says he will MOST LIKELY VOTE TO CONFIRM JUDGE KAVANAUGH
https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1045478279220797440
-
BREAKING: Source close to Sen. Manchin (D-WV) says he will MOST LIKELY VOTE TO CONFIRM JUDGE KAVANAUGH
https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1045478279220797440
I wouldn't be surprised if he gets in with 53 to 55 votes.
Not saying it's going to happen but there are some VERY vulnerable red state Democrats who are surely catching an earful from their constituents on this whole witch trial ordeal.
-
What a political clusterfuckery. Trying to ruin this guys career and personal life just because of his political affiliation, fucking pathetic.
-
"Dr" Ford says her own therapist got it wrong. Then in another video she can't seem to remember if she shared her notes with the WaPo or note. "Uh, uh, ummm, not sure if I did, uh I guess" in the second link's video. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA SHE'S DONE, SON. TOTAL FUCKING LIAR! Liars can never cope with being questioned with specifics and asked for details.
RIP the reputation of all legitimate victims sexual assault, just went up in smoke. This pampered piece of shit and every female idiot who supported her just killed the benefit of the doubt. "#IBelieveChristineFord" "StandwithChristine"? HAHAHAHAHA.
#IStandWithBrett
#FucktheDemocrats
#MotherFuckGilibrand
#MotherFuckHirono
#FuckBlumenthal
#FuckFeminists
#FuckLiars
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/27/blasey-ford-therapist-notes-wapo/ (https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/27/blasey-ford-therapist-notes-wapo/)
-
"Dr" Ford says her own therapist got it wrong. Then in another video she can't seem to remember if she shared her notes with the WaPo or note. "Uh, uh, ummm, not sure if I did, uh I guess" in the second link's video. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA SHE'S DONE, SON. TOTAL FUCKING LIAR! Liars can never cope with being questioned with specifics and asked for details.
RIP the reputation of all legitimate victims sexual assault, just went up in smoke. This pampered piece of shit and every female idiot who supported her just killed the benefit of the doubt. "#IBelieveChristineFord" "StandwithChristine"? HAHAHAHAHA.
#IStandWithBrett
#FucktheDemocrats
#MotherFuckGilibrand
#MotherFuckHirono
#FuckBlumenthal
#FuckFeminists
#FuckLiars
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/27/blasey-ford-therapist-notes-wapo/ (https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/27/blasey-ford-therapist-notes-wapo/)
Stefan Molyneux said she was north of 630k in donations this afternoon with her GoFundMe account.
It's fucked up but it's seemingly the way these things will be handled at times going forward.
-
Stefan Molyneux said she was north of 630k in donations this afternoon with her GoFundMe account.
It's fucked up but it's seemingly the way these things will be handled at times going forward.
I've been tracking her gofundme in this thread from day 1. She's going for $1 million.
This is what this whole thing was about. It was a publicity stunt and a cash grab done off the idiocy of the liberals in the general public.
Keep donating, f a g g o t s, she's gonna be real happy with the new house you just bought her by the beach.
-
P.S. Brett's wife is way better looking than that shoe-beaten bitch. Looks like a bag of smashed assholes with a blond dye job and coke bottle glasses. Who would fuck her? No wonder her husband hasn't come out publicly, he's ashamed to be sleeping with that thing.
-
Senator Grassley was just spectacular during this whole ordeal.
Took his lumps early with the press, gave in to the accuser's requests as a show of empathy. Put just enough heat on during the hearing.
Basically was the glue that kept everything together. Just solid leadership all around. Really impressive how he walked that tight rope.
I just can't imagine Kavanaugh not getting the nod after today but as the old saying goes..."crazier things have happened"
It's political suicide as a Republican to vote against him after his strong showing.
I agree with this.
-
Senator Graham summarizing the Demoncrats and the carnival of terror:
-
If the Democrats were truly concerned about Ford, they would have started the process when they became aware of it, and proper time would have permitted a better process.
But they were only doing this for political purposes, and it's obvious to anyone who posses any rational thought.
Exactly.
-
Senator Graham summarizing the Demoncrats and the carnival of terror:
I posted this a page back, Graham was awesome here, spoke from the heart, no notes, and he nailed it!
-
BREAKING: Source close to Sen. Manchin (D-WV) says he will MOST LIKELY VOTE TO CONFIRM JUDGE KAVANAUGH
https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1045478279220797440
I really hope this is true. Great sign if he said this after coming out of a meeting with Collins, Murkowski, and Flake after today's testimony.
-
Even by Congress' standards this turned into a real shitshow.
The conniving hag Feinstein of course denied leaking Dr. Ford's confidential letter and then proceeded to throw her under the bus. The only thing she cares about her re-election.
-
who cares what you think
you should worry about your own country
You sure as hell don’t worry about it
-
You sure as hell don’t worry about it
If you want to worry about Venezuela or any other country where you have no say in the process then feel free
seems kind of stupid but then that's kind of your thing
-
Even by Congress' standards this turned into a real shitshow.
The conniving hag Feinstein of course denied leaking Dr. Ford's confidential letter and then proceeded to throw her under the bus. The only thing she cares about her re-election.
Her whole behavior during this was so sad and pathetic.
85 years old and selling out to buy another 6 years that she likely won't even see.
The part where her 20 something year old assistants had to step up and answer for her was so telling.
You hear these stories about these barely functional dinosaur beaurocrats being propped up by their staff and that was so apparent when the spotlight was turned on her.
-
I will add that "Dr" Chrstine Ford has the most annoying, croaky voice I've ever heard in my life. It felt like she was fighting back tears the entire testimony. I'm sure her feelings are genuine, what with making nearly 3/4 of a million dollars for lying about some guy she's never met. Crying all the way to the bank, y'all.
-
BREAKING: We Have The Votes
With the Senate Judiciary Committee holding a vote at 9:30 A.M. tomorrow, a Senate insider has told Townhall that Kavanaugh has the votes to make it out of committee and the votes to be confirmed on the floor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sens. Flake (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Manchin (D-WV) are expected to vote in favor of Kavanaugh. All the Republicans are voting yes. Also, in the rumor mill, several Democrats may break ranks and back Kavanaugh. That’s the ball game, folks.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/27/breaking-we-have-the-votes-n2523402
-
Kav will be confirmed. Even Jeff Flake is going to vote for him.
Her female "friend" who was her only direct witness refuted the claims and the whole thing lacks the details of a truthful recollection....and she gets in airplanes at least once a year...big fat stalling liar.
-
What a political clusterfuckery. Trying to ruin this guys career and personal life just because of his political affiliation, fucking pathetic.
I would agree with you if that was a fact.
-
I would agree with you if that was a fact.
I'm actually all in favor of letting Democrats win everything and block SCOTUS nominees. You know why? Once they turn the entire country into Chicago's south side, that's when those of us who want a different country and a different society will get our moment in the sun. Not through the ballot box, dry committee hearings, and hashtag wars on Twitter.
;)
-
I've been tracking her gofundme in this thread from day 1. She's going for $1 million.
This is what this whole thing was about. It was a publicity stunt and a cash grab done off the idiocy of the liberals in the general public.
Keep donating, f a g g o t s, she's gonna be real happy with the new house you just bought her by the beach.
Nice try
-
I agree with this.
totally shocked
-
I posted this a page back, Graham was awesome here, spoke from the heart, no notes, and he nailed it!
I love your nativity. You really believe that was not orchestrated. I would give anything to be like you.
-
I would agree with you if that was a fact.
It's the only fact in the whole hearing, because there were none from the accuser.
-
I love your nativity. You really believe that was not orchestrated. I would give anything to be like you.
Pot meet kettle. The whole reason for orchestration was that Dems didn't have the votes to block without some crazy story at the last minute.
Not getting your way/losing is not a reason to obstruct the process. Win an election if you don't like it.
-
Nice try
Excuse me? The woman who makes more in a week in solicited donations than you made in your entire police career had motives other than fame and fortune? Make your case, officer.
-
Pot meet kettle. The whole reason for orchestration was that Dems didn't have the votes to block without some crazy story at the last minute.
Not getting your way/losing is not a reason to obstruct the process. Win an election if you don't like it.
The left doesn't fight fair. If it doesn't get its way through conventional channels, it turns to unorthodox methods and, if those fail, outright criminality.
-
I love your nativity. You really believe that was not orchestrated. I would give anything to be like you.
Naivety?? ???
-
Naivety?? ???
I read it as nativism, since that's a term often thrown around by the Left to describe alleged intolerance and xenophobia in those who express pride of country or culture (i.e. Whites).
-
BREAKING: We Have The Votes
With the Senate Judiciary Committee holding a vote at 9:30 A.M. tomorrow, a Senate insider has told Townhall that Kavanaugh has the votes to make it out of committee and the votes to be confirmed on the floor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sens. Flake (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Manchin (D-WV) are expected to vote in favor of Kavanaugh. All the Republicans are voting yes. Also, in the rumor mill, several Democrats may break ranks and back Kavanaugh. That’s the ball game, folks.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/27/breaking-we-have-the-votes-n2523402
Awesome. :)
-
totally shocked
::)
-
"A spokeswoman for GoFundMe, Katherine Cichy, said the company had verified the authenticity of the “Help Christine Blasey Ford” campaign and one other, which ran from Sept. 18 to Sept. 20 and raised $209,987 explicitly for her security costs. It was shut down after it exceeded its $175,000 goal.
"
“We are working directly with all campaign organizers and guarantee the funds raised will be transferred directly to the Ford family,” she said. (Dr. Blasey is sometimes referred to by her married name, Ford.)
Doesn't appear she set up any gofund me
-
"A spokeswoman for GoFundMe, Katherine Cichy, said the company had verified the authenticity of the “Help Christine Blasey Ford” campaign and one other, which ran from Sept. 18 to Sept. 20 and raised $209,987 explicitly for her security costs. It was shut down after it exceeded its $175,000 goal.
"
“We are working directly with all campaign organizers and guarantee the funds raised will be transferred directly to the Ford family,” she said. (Dr. Blasey is sometimes referred to by her married name, Ford.)
Doesn't appear she set up any gofund me
That homeless guy didn't set his up either but he still got funded to the tune of $400,000 by idiots who don't understand that you should never give money to a freeloader and expect to have it put to proper use. Who cares if she didn't start it? She's the beneficiary. It goes DIRECTLY INTO HER BANK ACCOUNT. And it's at close to a million now.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/27/gofundme-campaigns-raised-over-500000-to-cover-blasey-ford-costs.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/27/gofundme-campaigns-raised-over-500000-to-cover-blasey-ford-costs.html)
-
Her "security" was provided by taxpayers and the DC and Capitol police. She didn't need 'security' money. What she uses it on is her call, and I'm betting a new house and a new car. Thanks, America! ::)
She has not one but TWO gofundme accounts. LMFAO.
https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford (https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford)
https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs (https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs)
-
LM
$10
Liz McDaniel
5 hours ago
FK
$100
Frances Kazan
5 hours ago
$100
Paul Wiggin
5 hours ago
KW
$10
katie winters
5 hours ago
$10
Shannon Fischer
5 hours ago
IE
$20
Insa Elliott
5 hours ago
CJ
$50
Charlotte Jones-Roe
5 hours ago
AS
$100
Alice Sutton
5 hours ago
$250
Lar Kaufman
5 hours ago
GF
$50
GEORGE FAVALORO
5 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
5 hours ago
CC
$25
Cherie Chavez
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
KE
$20
Kathleen Lohmar Exel
5 hours ago
JB
$25
Jeremy Butler
5 hours ago
CR
$50
Cindy Raspiller
5 hours ago
$10
Ruth Scollan
5 hours ago
SJ
$25
Susan Jonas
5 hours ago
FB
$20
Flora Birnbaum
5 hours ago
EM
$10
Elizabeth McCambridge
5 hours ago
$25
Jiya Freeberg Sarma
5 hours ago
MR
$5
Michelle Rowe
5 hours ago
GJ
$20
Gerry and Karissa James
5 hours ago
MY
$20
Margo Young
5 hours ago
$5
Jessica Ramirez
5 hours ago
BM
$20
Bridget Moriarty
5 hours ago
JL
$50
Jaisri Lingappa
5 hours ago
$10
Hayne Lim
5 hours ago
CE
$5
Cameron Elliott
5 hours ago
RH
$50
Robert Harrington
5 hours ago
LH
$100
Laura Harris
5 hours ago
WS
$50
William Stokes
5 hours ago
RB
$10
Rick Blythe
5 hours ago
JC
$10
Jeff Costa
5 hours ago
SM
$20
Sharon Meraz
5 hours ago
$20
Merrik Bush
5 hours ago
DL
$30
Donna Laporta
5 hours ago
CC
$50
Carole Counihan
5 hours ago
$30
Michael T Charter
5 hours ago
NH
$10
Norma Hayes
5 hours ago
DS
$10
Deena Said
5 hours ago
PG
$25
Pastor Albanos Gatira
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
SH
$25
Sarah Hazan
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
SS
$10
Scott Sella
5 hours ago
DW
$10
Dana Williams
5 hours ago
KR
$10
Karen Reaume
5 hours ago
BK
$25
Bo Kearns
5 hours ago
WM
$10
Wendy Max
5 hours ago
LS
$200
Lisa Sather-long
5 hours ago
KK
$25
Karen Kane
5 hours ago
LH
$50
Laura Haston
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
AM
$100
Alan Mayer-Sommer
5 hours ago
$20
Bohdi Byles
5 hours ago
KM
$100
Karen Moore
5 hours ago
$25
Bobbie Sackman
5 hours ago
AB
$25
Anonymouse Broenner
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
VN
$50
V N
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
FP
$20
FRANCINE POWEL
5 hours ago
RS
$25
Richard Silverstein
5 hours ago
SC
$20
Susan Campbell
5 hours ago
LF
$25
Linda Fenner
5 hours ago
$25
Maria Lynn
5 hours ago
MM
$25
maria mcconnell
5 hours ago
JB
$20
Joan Brenner
5 hours ago
RK
$50
Roy Kleinsasser
5 hours ago
KS
$5
Kenneth Sanchez
5 hours ago
$5
Anonymous
5 hours ago
JB
$100
Jannet Borrmann
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$25
Adrianna Thomas
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
NG
$10
N Grant
5 hours ago
MM
$40
Mary Mayeux
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
CM
$50
Carolyn Modugno
5 hours ago
LS
$50
Leslie Somers
5 hours ago
KH
$25
Kimberly Hunsaker
5 hours ago
LP
$100
lenore pearlstein
5 hours ago
KF
$50
Kerry Feldman
5 hours ago
AD
$100
Audrey Dorfman
5 hours ago
KK
$25
Kathryn Krug
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
LS
$100
Leah Serebrenik
5 hours ago
JT
$20
janice stump tharp
5 hours ago
RP
$20
Rachel Peckerman
5 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$20
Tracy Biggs
5 hours ago
BT
$200
Betty Tsang
5 hours ago
TF
$50
Tina Fisher
5 hours ago
$10
Alicia Prendergast
5 hours ago
KM
$10
Kalis Malikov
5 hours ago
$36
Phyllis Anne Kosen
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
CP
$100
Cathy Phillips
5 hours ago
LK
$100
laura kalman
5 hours ago
EE
$50
Elizabeth Eifler
5 hours ago
RG
$25
Randolph Getsla
5 hours ago
WC
$25
wendy cloak
5 hours ago
$10
Sherry Glubo Kaplan
5 hours ago
ML
$5
Matthew Leishman
5 hours ago
JC
$100
John Carmody
5 hours ago
GM
$15
Girard Miller
5 hours ago
MT
$10
Melyora Trujillo
5 hours ago
JP
$100
Jeffrey Perloff
5 hours ago
RS
$20
Reed Stepleman
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
PB
$10
Patrick Box
5 hours ago
TP
$10
Tracy Pearce
5 hours ago
RD
$25
Robert D
5 hours ago
TN
$25
Tammy Neustein
5 hours ago
VP
$25
Victoria Pires
5 hours ago
JP
$25
John Pierce
5 hours ago
RB
$50
Roselyn Bonilla
5 hours ago
ES
$50
Elaine Silverstrim
5 hours ago
$25
diane obrien
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$5
Roland Burton
5 hours ago
$10
Pam Bingham
5 hours ago
TC
$10
Tracy Cudjoe-Taylor
5 hours ago
MM
$100
Michelle Morgan
5 hours ago
BM
$20
Barbara & Scott McCrae
5 hours ago
AB
$50
Ava Bayless
5 hours ago
NP
$25
Nancy Prost
5 hours ago
EW
$50
eryn Walanka
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
MG
$50
MICHAEL GADDINI
5 hours ago
SM
$20
Susan Monroe
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
DF
$100
Diana Fisketjon
5 hours ago
JO
$10
John Olsen
5 hours ago
ND
$25
Nicolas Dehaine
5 hours ago
AH
$20
Allison Hughes
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
MP
$50
Myrna Poirier
5 hours ago
$20
Charlotte Scott
5 hours ago
DT
$100
Derek Tusa
5 hours ago
DH
$50
Don Huber
5 hours ago
DF
$25
Debbie Ficarra
5 hours ago
SS
$20
Stefan Straka
5 hours ago
AB
$5
Amber Billingsley
5 hours ago
NB
$10
Nzinga Bryant
5 hours ago
MB
$50
Michael Bowman
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
WH
$20
William Hawes
5 hours ago
SA
$10
Sandra Alua
5 hours ago
DK
$75
Daphne Kis
5 hours ago
$10
Mollye de Armendi
5 hours ago
KS
$20
Keith Stocker
5 hours ago
BB
$15
Ben Bagniewski
5 hours ago
DN
$25
Diane Noreen
5 hours ago
BR
$10
Bonnie Rosenstein
5 hours ago
SS
$5
Shannon Santagata
5 hours ago
CL
$50
Camilo Libedinsky
5 hours ago
LF
$100
Lucia Fanjul
5 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
5 hours ago
MP
$20
Mary Pender
5 hours ago
$25
Brad Nahill
5 hours ago
GK
$100
Grace Koo
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
ZG
$10
Zach Graham
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
MS
$20
Malinda Selever
5 hours ago
KP
$50
Kathryn Phares
5 hours ago
JS
$25
Janette Sweeney
5 hours ago
SP
$25
Shelley Pollero
5 hours ago
JC
$20
Janet Campbell
5 hours ago
SL
$20
Suzanne Loper-Powers
5 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
5 hours ago
MA
$25
Michael Aguilar
5 hours ago
ZW
$10
Z W
5 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
5 hours ago
AL
$100
Ana Lago
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
RH
$25
Rayford Harwell
5 hours ago
MP
$5
Marjorie Polk
5 hours ago
MB
$10
Marylou Benson
5 hours ago
$2,500
Anonymous
5 hours ago
BL
$100
Bill Laidley
5 hours ago
AB
$25
Anna Bright
5 hours ago
JV
$20
James Varner
5 hours ago
TS
$10
Theresa Signorino
5 hours ago
$25
Meghan Hardin
5 hours ago
RC
$25
Ruby Carmen
5 hours ago
EH
$20
Erin Hobin
5 hours ago
KL
$50
kenneth litwack
5 hours ago
TB
$50
Tracy Barrett
5 hours ago
KS
$40
Katie Semack
5 hours ago
HN
$20
Heather Noble
5 hours ago
MU
$25
Melissa Usrey
5 hours ago
LF
$100
Laura Forte
5 hours ago
JH
$100
John Herman
5 hours ago
CM
$40
Caitlin Monroe
5 hours ago
MJ
$20
Melanie Jordan
5 hours ago
JN
$15
John Norris
5 hours ago
KK
$10
Kathryne Keinert
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
SA
$250
Steven Allen
5 hours ago
TM
$50
Theresa Monahan
5 hours ago
AB
$10
Anne. K Brereton
5 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
5 hours ago
AN
$200
Almaz Negash
5 hours ago
MT
$48
Marianne Tilds
5 hours ago
$50
Paula Williams Threlkeld
5 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
5 hours ago
SK
$10
Sharon King
5 hours ago
MF
$10
Mary Fierle
5 hours ago
WO
$50
William Orvis
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
RM
$5
richard mccullen
5 hours ago
FW
$50
Foster Wettlaufer
5 hours ago
RK
$10
Rebecca Krystosek
5 hours ago
MD
$25
Mark Daley
5 hours ago
VN
$50
Vijith Nair
5 hours ago
AS
$20
Aimee Sixel
5 hours ago
$10
Sambit Biswas
5 hours ago
PW
$10
Patricia Williams
5 hours ago
PL
$50
Phil Lofaro
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$25
Pernille Ripp
5 hours ago
JL
$10
Jan Lella
5 hours ago
$20
Nicole Murphy
5 hours ago
AV
$20
Ashley Vincent
5 hours ago
DR
$25
Deborah Reyes
5 hours ago
NS
$20
Nancy Sales
5 hours ago
ZW
$10
Zachary Williams
5 hours ago
LL
$25
Lizzy Linke
5 hours ago
$10
robert thiele
5 hours ago
LC
$10
Lisa Cain
5 hours ago
$5
Anonymous
5 hours ago
CD
$20
Carol Dolgon
5 hours ago
$5
Anonymous
5 hours ago
KD
$100
Kenneth Dunn
5 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$20
Pat Colyar
5 hours ago
$50
Christine Suchor
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
A
$10
Aubrey
5 hours ago
KB
$20
Kirsten Braudt
5 hours ago
SH
$20
Sybil Hadfield
5 hours ago
LD
$25
Leslie Davidson
5 hours ago
$200
Anonymous
5 hours ago
DR
$15
Daryn Rybicki
5 hours ago
SS
$40
Shawn Selby
5 hours ago
BG
$50
Buckley Guderian
5 hours ago
AA
$50
Adrienne Abramson
5 hours ago
AF
$100
Adrienne Filipov
5 hours ago
AL
$5
Angeline Long
5 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
5 hours ago
JB
$10
Jason Blake
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
SF
$20
Susan Fekety
5 hours ago
$15
Anonymous
5 hours ago
LF
$20
Laelia Francesca
5 hours ago
AM
$20
Amanda Medlock
5 hours ago
$5
Anonymous
5 hours ago
ND
$50
Nikki DAlessandro
5 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
5 hours ago
TB
$20
Toni Broyles
5 hours ago
SK
$20
Shabnam Kavousian
5 hours ago
PB
$25
Priscilla Del Bosque-Schouten
5 hours ago
KE
$50
Kenneth Ernst
5 hours ago
$100
Coleen Hanna
5 hours ago
JH
$5
Julia Hirata
5 hours ago
$25
Cathy Andrews
5 hours ago
JC
$5
Jessica Clapper
5 hours ago
AR
$20
Adrienne Robinson
5 hours ago
CF
$20
Carol and Ira Fischer
5 hours ago
AG
$5
Alice Gaffan-Driver
5 hours ago
$150
Anonymous
5 hours ago
HW
$50
Holly Wong
5 hours ago
JW
$20
John Wilusz
5 hours ago
CB
$25
Carrie May Bjorkquist
5 hours ago
DL
$20
Douglas Larkin
5 hours ago
$25
Gia Schaffer
5 hours ago
$5
Anonymous
5 hours ago
CH
$25
Catherine Hofmann
5 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$50
Kendra Lyons
5 hours ago
AD
$10
Amy Domeika
5 hours ago
BS
$20
barrie saccomanno
5 hours ago
WR
$20
William Ryan
5 hours ago
CH
$22
Charlotte Hammond
5 hours ago
LD
$25
Lisa Distefano
5 hours ago
JG
$25
Janet George
5 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
5 hours ago
KV
$100
Kari Vacura
5 hours ago
KC
$100
Kim Cobb
5 hours ago
MA
$50
Maria A
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
5 hours ago
LH
$25
Leigh Henderson
5 hours ago
KB
$25
Kristi Bartholomew
5 hours ago
ES
$50
Eileen Sullivan-Boss
5 hours ago
LE
$50
Laurie Eisendrath
5 hours ago
CM
$25
Craig Mcmahon
5 hours ago
NF
$25
Nancy Friedman
5 hours ago
JO
$5
Jacqueline O’Sullivan
5 hours ago
WF
$50
Will Friese
5 hours ago
JK
$20
Julie Kucyn
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
VT
$20
Virginia Tarnowski
6 hours ago
SW
$20
Stephen Wilde
6 hours ago
CP
$10
Cynthia Prien
6 hours ago
RT
$100
Reid Turnquist
6 hours ago
RT
$20
Robin Troutman
6 hours ago
KH
$10
Kate Hoff
6 hours ago
NV
$100
Nancy Vines
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
SS
$10
Saurav Shrestha
6 hours ago
DF
$25
Denise Fiorini
6 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$100
MJ Waters
6 hours ago
RS
$10
Rachael Sabra
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
CM
$50
Cheryl Mathieu
6 hours ago
AP
$40
Anna Preston
6 hours ago
MM
$50
mary maskell
6 hours ago
$25
Joe Pertel
6 hours ago
BB
$10
Beth Byrne
6 hours ago
NF
$18
Naomi Firestone-Teeter
6 hours ago
LM
$20
Laila McClay
6 hours ago
WG
$11
William Grill
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Chris Talmage
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
LA
$50
Liz Apkin
6 hours ago
DG
$25
Djuana Gibson
6 hours ago
JK
$25
Jennifer Kain
6 hours ago
AS
$25
Anand Singh
6 hours ago
AL
$20
Amy Love
6 hours ago
RK
$25
Russ Kirchenbauer
6 hours ago
$15
Anonymous
6 hours ago
JP
$100
Joelle Prislin
6 hours ago
TT
$25
Trish Tobin
6 hours ago
SF
$25
Sara Fisher
6 hours ago
CS
$25
Catherine Schendel
6 hours ago
$10
Mia Santamaria Della Valentina
6 hours ago
HH
$50
Holly Hurwitz
6 hours ago
LV
$50
Lynn Vailes
6 hours ago
JM
$25
Jim Moseley
6 hours ago
CW
$100
Catherine Willis
6 hours ago
BN
$5
Brian Naas
6 hours ago
RR
$30
Rohini Rao
6 hours ago
EM
$30
Ellen Muench
6 hours ago
JG
$100
Janice Genevro
6 hours ago
TS
$100
Teri Shouvli
6 hours ago
SW
$25
Shu Shu Wu
6 hours ago
$25
Elizabeth Ann
6 hours ago
AA
$25
al atari
6 hours ago
WS
$10
Wanda Shrum
6 hours ago
AN
$50
Alex Nketia
6 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
6 hours ago
MS
$100
Mary Styles
6 hours ago
$500
Anonymous
6 hours ago
ND
$50
Nadine DeVost
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
KT
$50
Katie Tosh
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
PC
$25
Purujit Chatterjee
6 hours ago
MS
$25
Mary Sheehan
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
MS
$25
Mitchell Smith
6 hours ago
$25
Gail Trieger
6 hours ago
JC
$25
Jean Carpenter
6 hours ago
GD
$10
Grace Day
6 hours ago
WS
$10
William Scott
6 hours ago
$20
Becky Smith
6 hours ago
TL
$20
Tracy Luke
6 hours ago
$15
Anonymous
6 hours ago
RF
$100
Rollin Fatland
6 hours ago
JJ
$100
Jolene Jarrell
6 hours ago
WB
$20
Willam Barnes
6 hours ago
LM
$20
Lindsay McConchie
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
EB
$20
Edward Brauer
6 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
TB
$100
Troy Buckaloo
6 hours ago
$10
Lori Delgado
6 hours ago
$50
Violeta Iguchi
6 hours ago
SL
$50
Saundra Liggins
6 hours ago
LW
$20
Lisa Woodward
6 hours ago
$10
Rachel Dunn
6 hours ago
TL
$25
Tina Lin
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
JS
$10
Jessica Samuel
6 hours ago
LW
$100
Lynn Walter
6 hours ago
CN
$10
Charlene Nolan
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$25
Psychology Docs
6 hours ago
$10
David Torres
6 hours ago
JM
$25
Johanna Metz
6 hours ago
AT
$25
anthony tedesco
6 hours ago
JW
$20
Joy Weidling
6 hours ago
$25
Deborah Newcomb-Skeans
6 hours ago
CD
$25
Courtney Dragoon
6 hours ago
$25
Catherine Polcyn
6 hours ago
VB
$50
Vicki Bryden
6 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
6 hours ago
DR
$30
David Rissenberg
6 hours ago
$100
Carol Atterbury
6 hours ago
KS
$50
Katherine Schwering
6 hours ago
EL
$25
Elaine Litwack
6 hours ago
KB
$5
Kelly Brown
6 hours ago
JG
$75
Jacqueline Gallagher
6 hours ago
KW
$25
Katharine Wheeler
6 hours ago
$50
Karen Chapman
6 hours ago
SA
$25
Sherry Ash-Rabith
6 hours ago
JC
$50
Jarkko Cain
6 hours ago
JM
$25
John Matthews
6 hours ago
LM
$50
Lisa Maley
6 hours ago
DP
$100
Dwarakanath Parvatam
6 hours ago
$10
Kelly Green
6 hours ago
DB
$25
Donna Blakely
6 hours ago
LB
$10
Lela Brodsky
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
S B
6 hours ago
FS
$20
Frances Smith
6 hours ago
MS
$50
Marla Swanson
6 hours ago
MK
$25
Marni Kagan
6 hours ago
JS
$50
JENNIFER SCHAEFER
6 hours ago
KR
$25
Kate Radetsky
6 hours ago
$25
Barry Chretien
6 hours ago
PC
$100
Peter Curtis
6 hours ago
DW
$25
Daniel Webb
6 hours ago
$20
Laura Edelstein
6 hours ago
VO
$25
Vikki O'Neil
6 hours ago
$10
Kathryn Buck
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$45
Anonymous
6 hours ago
LH
$25
Liz Hall
6 hours ago
TB
$10
Tana Beverwyk-Abouda
6 hours ago
JD
$20
James Dionne-Odom
6 hours ago
JG
$25
Julie Galassini
6 hours ago
MC
$50
Mark Hughes Cobb
6 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Erika Peirce
6 hours ago
$25
Linda Spaulding
6 hours ago
MF
$100
Melissa Fleming
6 hours ago
RG
$25
Robert Gray
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
CN
$20
Christian Nill
6 hours ago
YA
$100
Yvonne Adams
6 hours ago
JW
$25
JOANNE S WEBER
6 hours ago
MA
$250
Marc Atkins
6 hours ago
MD
$50
Mark DeGreef
6 hours ago
LM
$20
Lanne Margrett
6 hours ago
$100
Jana Black
6 hours ago
MM
$500
Mary McDermott
6 hours ago
$10
Courtney Anderson
6 hours ago
ML
$500
Mary Luddy
6 hours ago
MJ
$50
Martha Jacobs
6 hours ago
CG
$10
Caty Greene
6 hours ago
TB
$20
Tasnim Beg
6 hours ago
$15
Kristie Hackett
6 hours ago
SS
$25
Sarah Sardinsky
6 hours ago
$20
Mary Cagnina
6 hours ago
EV
$5
Edith Villanueva
6 hours ago
BK
$10
Brigid Khuri
6 hours ago
AS
$25
Anita Sonquist
6 hours ago
TK
$50
teddy kinney
6 hours ago
$15
Anonymous
6 hours ago
SP
$50
Suzanne Perry
6 hours ago
HE
$20
Hendrik Evenhuis
6 hours ago
$25
David Lowery
6 hours ago
GS
$25
Greg Serafin
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$5
Cynthia Gray
6 hours ago
$24
Anonymous
6 hours ago
NK
$20
Nancy Keese-Sato
6 hours ago
$5
Eduardo Cristoforis
6 hours ago
PJ
$10
Patricia Jones
6 hours ago
JM
$5
Janet Meehan
6 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
6 hours ago
NC
$50
Noreen Collins
6 hours ago
$15
Heather Byrne Vieira
6 hours ago
EH
$25
Elizabeth Harris
6 hours ago
KL
$100
Kathleen Lawlor
6 hours ago
LK
$25
Laura Keil
6 hours ago
HL
$10
Hing Lum
6 hours ago
$15
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
CS
$25
Caroline Sandlin
6 hours ago
CB
$25
Cheri Bichsel
6 hours ago
$50
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$50
Kate Coffey
6 hours ago
HF
$15
Howard Fradkin
6 hours ago
MB
$100
Michelle Bratton
6 hours ago
LP
$20
Laurent Picard
6 hours ago
KS
$20
Kari Stanley
6 hours ago
EH
$20
Einar Huber
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
PA
$50
Perry Anderson
6 hours ago
$100
Nina D'Iorio
6 hours ago
PK
$10
Patricia Kramer
6 hours ago
MG
$15
Matthew Gatti
6 hours ago
BR
$50
Brian Rogers
6 hours ago
KD
$10
Kasey Decosimo
6 hours ago
$20
Suzanne Sisco
6 hours ago
RB
$50
Renee Badertscher
6 hours ago
JW
$100
Jessica Wilson
6 hours ago
KS
$50
Kelly Sahner
6 hours ago
MC
$100
Marjorie Carter
6 hours ago
RH
$50
Rachel Hudson
6 hours ago
$20
Anonymous
6 hours ago
MK
$25
Margaret Kennedy
6 hours ago
SS
$20
Stephanie Stolzenberg
6 hours ago
$10
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
AF
$20
Ann Ferguson
6 hours ago
$100
Anonymous
6 hours ago
$20
Dorleen Fowler
6 hours ago
$25
Anonymous
6 hours ago
CA
$25
Clint Adams
6 hours ago
ER
$20
Erin Riggins
6 hours ago
KV
$20
Kristin Valdez
6 hours ago
$20
Kimberly Henning
6 hours ago
$10
Melanie Moore
6 hours ago
JW
$50
Julie Weissend
6 hours ago
-
Look at the lemmings go! Sending their tax refunds and hard-earned paycheck money to a fraud and a thief. Hahahaha.
If you wonder how dictators ever come to power, how rumors snowball into viral convictions, and how people are led over a cliff by unscrupulous dictators and political strongmen, I refer you to the above.
People are, without a doubt, morons. Like, REALLY stupid. SUPER SUPER SUPER ULTRA stupid. Not fit to own a broomstick or a pair of keys stupid.
-
If the Democrats were truly concerned about Ford, they would have started the process when they became aware of it, and proper time would have permitted a better process.
But they were only doing this for political purposes, and it's obvious to anyone who posses any rational thought.
Exactly right.
How can anyone argue against this
It was all done for political reasons
-
I love your nativity. You really believe that was not orchestrated. I would give anything to be like you.
(http://www.ncregister.com/images/uploads/ArmstrongD-CRECHE.jpg)
-
"A spokeswoman for GoFundMe, Katherine Cichy, said the company had verified the authenticity of the “Help Christine Blasey Ford” campaign and one other, which ran from Sept. 18 to Sept. 20 and raised $209,987 explicitly for her security costs. It was shut down after it exceeded its $175,000 goal.
"
“We are working directly with all campaign organizers and guarantee the funds raised will be transferred directly to the Ford family,” she said. (Dr. Blasey is sometimes referred to by her married name, Ford.)
Doesn't appear she set up any gofund me
$473,622 of $150,000 goal + $209,987 of $175,000 goal = $683,609
https://ca.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford
https://www.gofundme.com/to-cover-dr-fords-security-costs
-
;D
-
Senator Grassley was just spectacular during this whole ordeal.
Took his lumps early with the press, gave in to the accuser's requests as a show of empathy. Put just enough heat on during the hearing.
Basically was the glue that kept everything together. Just solid leadership all around. Really impressive how he walked that tight rope.
I just can't imagine Kavanaugh not getting the nod after today but as the old saying goes..."crazier things have happened"
It's political suicide as a Republican to vote against him after his strong showing.
yup
-
the bitch was practically gang raped again on Capitol Hill :-X I honestly feel somewhat sorry for her.
-
the bitch was practically gang raped again on Capitol Hill :-X I honestly feel somewhat sorry for her.
A woman who's legitimately scarred by being smothered by men in a terror-rape type situation doesn't look so cool and comfortable with people crowding her personal space like that photo. You can tell she's had gangbangs before, not just in high school but recently as well. Her facial expression is the classic porn actress being eaten out prior to getting flipped over and railed by multiple men in a movie. She loves men, and it's so damn obvious.
-
the bitch was practically gang raped again on Capitol Hill :-X I honestly feel somewhat sorry for her.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=648399.0;attach=766044;image)
And she seems way too comfortable for someone who is allegedly traumatized by an attempted gang rape.
Her attorneys seem like true "experts."
(https://d9nvuahg4xykp.cloudfront.net/-848194254186800096/1518121763647725508.jpg)
-
I love your nativity. You really believe that was not orchestrated. I would give anything to be like you.
Lol, so oblivious to your own shortcomings. You are a lemming/follower. You are feelings oriented.
-
LOL, half the democrats just left the committee hearing while chairman Grassley was speaking. Harris, Booker, Hirono among them. It'll be on YouTube shortly.
They're such children. Literally when they don't get their way, they pick up their pencils and leave the room on live TV. What a disgrace. You'll never see a conservative do the same thing for liberal judges.
The Democrats are the biggest joke in American history. Anyone who votes for them is a traitor, a criminal, and a scumbag. Turning the highest offices and most solemn processes in the country into a fucking farce.
-
Jeff Flake: I Will Vote to Confirm Brett Kavanaugh
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/GettyImages-910241942-640x480.jpg)
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) revealed in a statement Friday that he will vote to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was considered a key swing vote to confirm Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.
The senator’s full statement reads:
After hearing more than 30 hours of testimony from Judge Kavanaugh earlier this month, I was prepared to support his nomination based on his view of the law and his record as a judge. In fact, I commented at the time that had he been nominated in another era, he would have likely received 90+ votes.
When Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh surfaced two weeks ago, I insisted that she be allowed to testify before the committee moved to a vote. Yesterday, we heard compelling testimony from Dr. Ford, as well as a persuasive response from Judge Kavanaugh. I wish that I could express the confidence that some of my colleagues have conveyed about what either did or did not happen in the early 1980s, but I left the hearing yesterday with as much doubt as certainty.
What I do know is that our system of justice affords a presumption of innocence to the accused, absent corroborating evidence. That is what binds us to the rule of law. While some may argue that a different standard should apply regarding the Senate’s advice and consent responsibilities, I believe that the constitution’s provisions of fairness and due process apply here as well.
I will vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.
CNN reports that when Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) heard the news of Flake’s decision, his immediate response was, “Oh f*ck.”
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/28/jeff-flake-will-vote-to-confirm-brett-kavanaugh/
-
You get Flake on board, I think that's a wrap.
Democrat senators from Montana, North Dakota, Indiana, West Virginia could potentially cross the aisle.
McCaskill in Missouri seems hell bent on dying on this hill but is it really a fight worth fighting?
-
CNN reports that when Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) heard the news of Flake’s decision, his immediate response was, “Oh f*ck.”
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/28/jeff-flake-will-vote-to-confirm-brett-kavanaugh/
LOL ;D
-
Sen. Bob Corker to Vote ‘Yes’ on Kavanaugh: ‘Nothing Corroborates the Allegation’
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/Bob-Corker-640x480.jpg)
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) announced Thursday evening that he would vote to confirm President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, pointing to the lack of corroboration of Dr. Christine Ford’s allegation of sexual assault.
“I believe those who come forward with allegations of sexual assault deserve to be heard,” he wrote in a statement. “That is why I was one of the first members of the Senate to call on the judiciary committee to delay the original vote on the nomination so that both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh could provide additional information.”
“I know it took courage for Dr. Ford to appear before the committee today,” he continued. “I also very strongly believe that Judge Kavanaugh, like all Americans, deserves the presumption of innocence and that it was equally as important for him to have the opportunity to address the charges and defend himself.”
-
Either Murkoski or Collins commits at this point and we have a newly appointed HONORABLE Supreme Court Justice.
-
LOL, half the democrats just left the committee hearing while chairman Grassley was speaking. Harris, Booker, Hirono among them. It'll be on YouTube shortly.
They're such children. Literally when they don't get their way, they pick up their pencils and leave the room on live TV. What a disgrace. You'll never see a conservative do the same thing for liberal judges.
The Democrats are the biggest joke in American history. Anyone who votes for them is a traitor, a criminal, and a scumbag. Turning the highest offices and most solemn processes in the country into a fucking farce.
Liberals are so pathetic a new word needs to be generated to describe their shamelessness and the bottomless depths of their stupidity.
(https://i.postimg.cc/xjzyWhG6/Screenshot_2018-09-28_10.27.04.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/hPRbgspc/Screenshot_2018-09-28_10.28.34.png)
-
Some Dems walk out of meeting after panel decides to vote on Kavanaugh later today
Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court is poised for a vote Friday morning by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Republican-led committee began a crucial meeting to debate and then to vote on whether to advance the nomination to the full Senate — a day after nearly nine hours of emotional and at times wrenching testimony from the judge and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, on her allegation of sexual assault when they were teens.
Here's how the day is unfolding:
10:23 am: Leahy: 'It feels like Alice in Wonderland around here.'
"It's almost surreal," Leahy said, admonishing the committee amid the meeting on Kavanaugh's confirmation. "This Judiciary Committee is no longer an independent branch of government. And we're supposed to be. The Senate is supposed to be an independent, equal branch of government. We're no longer that. We are an arm and a very weak arm of the Trump White House. Every semblance of independence has just disappeared. It's gone."
9:53 am: Democrats briefly walk out
Interested in Supreme Court?
Add Supreme Court as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Supreme Court Add Interest
Democratic senators Kamala Harris of California, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Patrick Leahy of Vermont walked out of the meeting in protest.
Staff for Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey left the room, signaling he might walk out too. Eventually, two of the Democratic members that walked out, Leahy and Whitehouse, returned to the Dirksen room.
Ranking Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed to sum up her colleagues' frustration as she underscored the severity of their task and actions of Republicans on the committee.
“I hoped we would do better and show women that our country, our committee, has in fact changed,” the ranking member said. “This isn't a political battle for power, as some have said. This is a serious undertaking with serious allegations. While the Republican strategy is no longer attack the victim, it is ignore the victim. The entire country is watching now how we handle these serious allegations.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley, the committee's chairman, responded to the mostly absent minority during the meeting, asserting, "I regret that my Democratic colleagues again failed to timely bring this relevant information to his attention."
With the committee closely split between 11 GOP members and 10 Democrats, if one Republican votes "no" or "present" on the recommendation, the nomination won't have the endorsement of the full committee.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-nomination-slated-vote-friday-morning-senate-committee/story?id=58107011
-
Some Dems walk out of meeting after panel decides to vote on Kavanaugh later today
Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court is poised for a vote Friday morning by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Republican-led committee began a crucial meeting to debate and then to vote on whether to advance the nomination to the full Senate — a day after nearly nine hours of emotional and at times wrenching testimony from the judge and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, on her allegation of sexual assault when they were teens.
Here's how the day is unfolding:
10:23 am: Leahy: 'It feels like Alice in Wonderland around here.'
"It's almost surreal," Leahy said, admonishing the committee amid the meeting on Kavanaugh's confirmation. "This Judiciary Committee is no longer an independent branch of government. And we're supposed to be. The Senate is supposed to be an independent, equal branch of government. We're no longer that. We are an arm and a very weak arm of the Trump White House. Every semblance of independence has just disappeared. It's gone."
9:53 am: Democrats briefly walk out
Interested in Supreme Court?
Add Supreme Court as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Supreme Court Add Interest
Democratic senators Kamala Harris of California, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Patrick Leahy of Vermont walked out of the meeting in protest.
Staff for Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey left the room, signaling he might walk out too. Eventually, two of the Democratic members that walked out, Leahy and Whitehouse, returned to the Dirksen room.
Ranking Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed to sum up her colleagues' frustration as she underscored the severity of their task and actions of Republicans on the committee.
“I hoped we would do better and show women that our country, our committee, has in fact changed,” the ranking member said. “This isn't a political battle for power, as some have said. This is a serious undertaking with serious allegations. While the Republican strategy is no longer attack the victim, it is ignore the victim. The entire country is watching now how we handle these serious allegations.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley, the committee's chairman, responded to the mostly absent minority during the meeting, asserting, "I regret that my Democratic colleagues again failed to timely bring this relevant information to his attention."
With the committee closely split between 11 GOP members and 10 Democrats, if one Republican votes "no" or "present" on the recommendation, the nomination won't have the endorsement of the full committee.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-nomination-slated-vote-friday-morning-senate-committee/story?id=58107011
Nice publicity stunt. It's alright, your dung beetle followers gobble it up and take it at face value. Apparently they don't know how Washington works. Nothing is what it seems.
(https://i.postimg.cc/xjzyWhG6/Screenshot_2018-09-28_10.27.04.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/hPRbgspc/Screenshot_2018-09-28_10.28.34.png)
-
As fucked as our government is. And it is fucked.
I think McConnell lines this one up and seats Kavanaugh for the next 30 to 40 years.
The Senate is such a Brotherhood and I just can't imagine he doesn't have the votes lined up.
Anything is possible though!
-
Senator Graham just shut it down. 8)
-
Senator Graham just shut it down. 8)
I must admit, that guy has had a decently solid transformation over the past 2 years.
Sniffing the political winds and seeing that the Neo-Con gravy train ride is coming to an end with big boss Trump at the reins?
Yeah that's possible.
A complete opportunist? Come on now...we all know that.
But you have to give respect when it's due and Senator Graham has showed up pretty significantly to buoy the party when it has been necessary.
-
.
-
Jeff Flake: I Will Vote to Confirm Brett Kavanaugh
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/GettyImages-910241942-640x480.jpg)
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) revealed in a statement Friday that he will vote to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was considered a key swing vote to confirm Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.
The senator’s full statement reads:
After hearing more than 30 hours of testimony from Judge Kavanaugh earlier this month, I was prepared to support his nomination based on his view of the law and his record as a judge. In fact, I commented at the time that had he been nominated in another era, he would have likely received 90+ votes.
When Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh surfaced two weeks ago, I insisted that she be allowed to testify before the committee moved to a vote. Yesterday, we heard compelling testimony from Dr. Ford, as well as a persuasive response from Judge Kavanaugh. I wish that I could express the confidence that some of my colleagues have conveyed about what either did or did not happen in the early 1980s, but I left the hearing yesterday with as much doubt as certainty.
What I do know is that our system of justice affords a presumption of innocence to the accused, absent corroborating evidence. That is what binds us to the rule of law. While some may argue that a different standard should apply regarding the Senate’s advice and consent responsibilities, I believe that the constitution’s provisions of fairness and due process apply here as well.
I will vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.
CNN reports that when Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) heard the news of Flake’s decision, his immediate response was, “Oh f*ck.”
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/28/jeff-flake-will-vote-to-confirm-brett-kavanaugh/
LOL!!! ;D
Elizabeth Landers
Verified account
@ElizLanders
Follow Follow @ElizLanders
More
.@JeffFlake is a YES on Kavanaugh.
@SunlenSerfaty broke that news to Sen. Coons in the hallway as he walked into the hearing.
Coons said, “Oh f—k,” then choked up, “We each make choices for our own reason. I’m struggling, sorry.”
6:35 AM - 28 Sep 2018 from Washington, DC
2,097 Retweets 5,789 Likes
256 replies 2,097 retweets 5,789 likes
Reply 256 Retweet 2.1K Like 5.8K
-
Either Murkoski or Collins commits at this point and we have a newly appointed HONORABLE Supreme Court Justice.
Or Manchin.
-
(https://static.pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/user-content/40/files/2018/09/graham.jpg)
-
I must admit, that guy has had a decently solid transformation over the past 2 years.
Sniffing the political winds and seeing that the Neo-Con gravy train ride is coming to an end with big boss Trump at the reins?
Yeah that's possible.
A complete opportunist? Come on now...we all know that.
But you have to give respect when it's due and Senator Graham has showed up pretty significantly to buoy the party when it has been necessary.
You're either on the Trump train or you're going to get thrown off to the side along with the deep stateists, the old fossil senators that don't understand the new Washington, and the Demoturds with their picket signs, their showground stall bell ringing, hellalujas, we-are-the-world hand-holding one-worldism, and their unprecedented and Putin-approved paranoid detestation of everything and anything made in America.
Graham gets it. The others? They're getting left behind or they're on the train, because Trump isn't pulling the emergency brake for anyone. Full steam ahead to 2020 and beyond.
-
Or Manchin.
I don't have the stats in front of me but Trump won West Virginia by a pretty wide margin.
You combine that with the spirit of those Appalachian mountain folk in West Virginia and I just imagine his phone is ringing off the hook.
How can Manchin vote NO??
The lurkers who hide behind their rocks will crawl out and attack but I still say a vote North of 53 IS POSSIBLE.
-
(https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/trumps-2nd-term-supreme-court-nominations-ray-liotta-triggered-liberal.jpg?resize=515%2C415&ssl=1)
-
These losers wasted all their ammo on someone who we aren't even sure how "conservative/constitutional" he is on several of his rulings.
-
I don't have the stats in front of me but Trump won West Virginia by a pretty wide margin.
You combine that with the spirit of those Appalachian mountain folk in West Virginia and I just imagine his phone is ringing off the hook.
How can Manchin vote NO??
The lurkers who hide behind their rocks will crawl out and attack but I still say a vote North of 53 IS POSSIBLE.
Yep. I think he will vote yes.
-
(https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/trumps-2nd-term-supreme-court-nominations-ray-liotta-triggered-liberal.jpg?resize=515%2C415&ssl=1)
;D
-
Cory Booker is such a dumpster fire to watch.
No backbone. No real policy agenda. Same old played out race/gender division tactics.
A b-team wannabe trying to wrestle his way into the larger Senate landscape.
Trump would MELT this guy in front of the entire world on stage.
-
George W. Bush Is Whipping Votes for Brett Kavanaugh
(https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/gettyimages-71102247.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&w=779&strip=all)
With Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote just days away, a big-name supporter of the embattled judge has been making calls to senators who haven’t yet decided if they’ll vote for him.
George W. Bush, the Washington Post reports, has reached out in recent days to Republican senators Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, and Lisa Murkowski, along with Democratic Senator Joe Manchin. The group of four is seen as the key to Kavanaugh’s confirmation; without their votes, he will fail to land a seat on the Supreme Court.
The Post suggests that Bush has entered the fray, at least in part, because these undecided senators are less likely to be swayed by President Trump, who hasn’t made very good friends with any of them. And while that may be what’s driving Bush’s most recent attempt to win support for Kavanaugh, it’s not the whole reason he’s involved.
Bush and Kavanaugh go way back. In 2000, the judge worked for Bush during the Florida recount. In 2003, he nominated Kavanaugh to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. That nomination was held up for three years, during which time Kavanaugh served as White House Staff Secretary. In the summer of 2006, Kavanaugh finally made it onto the court.
When President Trump tapped Kavanaugh to join the Supreme Court in July, Bush came out in full support. “He is a fine husband, father, and friend — and a man of the highest integrity. He will make a superb Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States,” Bush said. Two months later, after the judge was accused of attempted rape, Bush reaffirmed his support.
https://www.google.com/amp/nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/amp/2018/09/george-w-bush-is-whipping-votes-for-brett-kavanaugh.html
-
So at THIS point and time, IF the Dems were given 3 more days (some asking for 1 week) for the FBI investigation to be reopened, they would FINALLY STFU? Is that what the majority of them are saying?
-
Cory Booker is such a dumpster fire to watch.
No backbone. No real policy agenda. Same old played out race/gender division tactics.
A b-team wannabe trying to wrestle his way into the larger Senate landscape.
Trump would MELT this guy in front of the entire world on stage.
A real drama queen.
-
So at THIS point and time, IF the Dems were given 3 more days (some asking for 1 week) for the FBI investigation to be reopened, they would FINALLY STFU? Is that what the majority of them are saying?
Of course not.
-
Out of committee with Flake being flaky. I hope McConnell goes forward with the floor vote on Monday.
-
So at THIS point and time, IF the Dems were given 3 more days (some asking for 1 week) for the FBI investigation to be reopened, they would FINALLY STFU? Is that what the majority of them are saying?
Of course not.
That was not intended to be a rhetorical question. :-\
-
The Democrat senators from Indiana and Montana are in opposition. Very interesting to see how this will play out in November.
Two red state Democrats announce opposition to Kavanaugh
(https://thehill.com/sites/default/files/styles/thumb_small_article/public/donnellyjoe_091217gn_lead.jpg?itok=TwCUe3fQ)
(https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/07/05/105312375-1530799033016gettyimages-881100060.530x298.jpeg?v=1530799088)
Washington (CNN) Two red state Democrats facing re-election in 2018 announced on Friday that they oppose Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court.
Sens. Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Jon Tester of Montana both came out against President Donald Trump's nominee the day after Christine Blasey Ford testified that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the early 1980s -- allegations that Kavanaugh vehemently denied.
"I have deep reservations about Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to this lifetime position and ... we have been unable to get all the information necessary regarding this nomination, despite my best efforts," Donnelly said in a statement on Friday.
"While I would gladly welcome the opportunity to work with President Trump on a new nominee for this critically important position, if Judge Kavanaugh's nomination comes before the full Senate for a vote under these circumstances, I will oppose it," he said.
Tester put out a statement later in the day on Friday, citing a number of concerns with Kavanaugh's record as well as concerns over the allegations of sexual assault.
"I have concerns that Judge Kavanaugh defended the PATRIOT Act instead of Montanans' privacy," the senator said. "I have concerns about his support for more dark money in politics. I have concerns about who he believes is in charge of making personal health decisions. And I have deep concerns about the allegations of sexual assault against Judge Kavanaugh. Unfortunately, Judge Kavanaugh couldn't find time to discuss these concerns with me in person, so the only information I have is from what he said in his hearings. I'll be voting against him."
Donnelly was one of three Democrats in the chamber to back President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, and he had been an a handful of undecided senators from red or purple states that Kavanaugh's supporters had targeted for support.
The news makes the battle for Senate Republicans to confirm Trump's nominee harder given the GOP's razor-thin majority in the upper chamber. Republicans can only afford to lose one GOP vote if all Senate Democrats opt to vote against the nomination, and many congressional observers are closely watching a pair of undecided moderate Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, to determine the future of Kavanaugh's nomination.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/09/28/politics/joe-donnelly-kavanaugh-nomination/index.html
-
Of course they'd find something else to bitch about to try and further DELAY. Everyone of them said they want the FBI to reopen the investigation, most saying 3 days like the Hill case. So IF they were given their 3 days, they could theoretically vote by next Friday right? It would still be done before the election and they'd have nothing more to bitch about, right? That's what they're SAYING. ???
2nd question: They constantly pummeled Kavanaugh with the implied authority to reopen the FBI investigation. If HE had come right out and said yes, reopen the investigation, rather than saying "I will do whatever the committee wants", would that have held more weight (Dems infer that it would)? Does he even have the power to make them do it?
-
That was not intended to be a rhetorical question. :-\
Only Republican I've heard say it was Flake, although he seemed to say (without naming them) that Collins and Murkowski agree with him.
-
From what I've heard, congress cannot authorize an FBI investigation. Only the President can do that.
-
From what I've heard, congress cannot authorize an FBI investigation. Only the President can do that.
I heard that too, although I think McConnell could delay or kill a floor vote if he wants and FBI investigation.
-
I heard that too, although I think McConnell could delay or kill a floor vote if he wants and FBI investigation.
This whole circus keeps getting crazier and crazier. Both republicans and democrats are in a pickle right now. There are no easy answers.
-
Fine. Give them their f'g investigation. Naturally they're gonna want a week or more and continue to lay on the demands even though they've already stated 3 days would suffice siting the Hill case. Again, another cave in by (R) making them appear spineless. Careful what you wish for folks. kavanaugh has nothing to worry about. Ford's entire past sexual history will be out on display for public consumption.
-
Fine. Give them their f'g investigation. Naturally they're gonna want a week or more and continue to lay on the demands even though they've already stated 3 days would suffice siting the Hill case. Again, another cave in by (R) making them appear spineless. Careful what you wish for folks. kavanaugh has nothing to worry about. Ford's entire past sexual history will be out on display for public consumption.
So now they are delaying the vote for one week for an FBI investigation.
My prediction: the FBI will get statements that repeat what the witnesses have already said. Not a single Democrat will change his or her vote. Ford will file a criminal complaint with the state of Maryland. Democrats will demand a delay until after the state completes its investigation.
And Kavanaugh will be confirmed week after next.
-
So what is the reason the Democrats are asking for the FBI to investigate if its reports are inconclusive, not worth anything and we cannot rely on them?
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI explicitly does not, in this case or any other case, reach a conclusion, period. Period.
The reason why we cannot rely on the FBI report, you would not like it if we did, because it’s inconclusive. They say, he said, she said and they said, period.
So when people wave an FBI report before you, understand they do not — they do not, they do not — reach conclusions. They do not make, as my friend points out more accurately, they do not make recommendations.”
-
Fine. Give them their f'g investigation. Naturally they're gonna want a week or more and continue to lay on the demands even though they've already stated 3 days would suffice siting the Hill case. Again, another cave in by (R) making them appear spineless. Careful what you wish for folks. kavanaugh has nothing to worry about. Ford's entire past sexual history will be out on display for public consumption.
Don't kid yourself. This isn't just about Ford and no way in hell this lasts just a week. The dems will delay even further by looking into the other fake allegations and during that time you can bet other fake allegations will surface. All this is, is just hold off until after the Nov elections. Flake has always been a hero of the left.
-
Republicans may have shot themselves in the foot and destroyed chances at midterms. Hope it is the opposite and people will be motivated to get those like Flake out. Good thing he has already bowed out.
-
Not surprising that Flake is from Arizona...WWMD? What Would McCain DO? This very thing...
All of these politicians are either owned or subject to control files that get dangled in front of them when they get out of line.
-
Once confirmed I hope Kavanaugh remembers the assault on his character and his family during these times.
-
Cory Booker physically assaulted a woman in high school and wrote an article about it in 1992. There's a number of wife-beaters on the Democrat side, including Keith Ellison. Not a word said about them at the hearings today.
Dems = can never be taken seriously except by radical left anarchists, 'minorities', and misandrist psychopaths (like Ford).
-
Cory Booker physically assaulted a woman in high school and wrote an article about it in 1992. There's a number of wife-beaters on the Democrat side, including Keith Ellison. Not a word said about them at the hearings today.
Dems = can never be taken seriously except by radical left anarchists, 'minorities', and misandrist psychopaths (like Ford).
-
They've already went over Kavanaugh with a fine toothed comb and 4 of the supposed top witnesses say they were not even there.
Plus the man is a federal judge who teaches law. Who knows how to handle this situation better than him?
It seems to me that more will be brought to light about Ford and who knows what will come out of that?
More allegations against other men or co workers(sexual or nonsexual)? It's possible.
-
They've already went over Kavanaugh with a fine toothed comb and 4 of the supposed top witnesses say they were not even there.
Plus the man is a federal judge who teaches law. Who knows how to handle this situation better than him?
It seems to me that more will be brought to light about Ford and who knows what will come out of that?
More allegations against other men or co workers(sexual or nonsexual)? It's possible.
What it does is open the door to every scumbag, liar, and opportunist the Democrats can pressure into joining this theater of madness, without necessarily having to put then before a committee. FBI sources can be anonymous and that's exactly what you'll get - faceless, nameless cowards (as Ford herself was at the beginning until Feinstein leaked her name to the press) trashing a nominee they don't want appointed.
Today, any dignity or respect associated with the Senate just went out the door (literally, in the case of Harris, Blumenthal, Hirono et al.).
-
(https://scontent-lax3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42677866_1770417943057499_2547076371448856576_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&oh=0cc3e3280f4b168ab68479cea60349c4&oe=5C148999)
-
That article is Sen. Cory "Spartacus" Booker's shot record - he self-inoculated against charges of misogyny.
-
The hysterical maniac who scared dickless Jeff Flake into reversing his own vote. This is how the Left does things - not through process or discussion, but blunt force trauma, embarrassing emotional explosions in public, shutting down committee hearings with violent heckling and being dragged out, accosting and savaging public officials at restaurants with their families, and mindless paroxysms of rage on camera (bought and paid for by CNN).
-
What it does is open the door to every scumbag, liar, and opportunist the Democrats can pressure into joining this theater of madness, without necessarily having to put then before a committee. FBI sources can be anonymous and that's exactly what you'll get - faceless, nameless cowards (as Ford herself was at the beginning until Feinstein leaked her name to the press) trashing a nominee they don't want appointed.
Today, any dignity or respect associated with the Senate just went out the door (literally, in the case of Harris, Blumenthal, Hirono et al.).
It just strikes me as such a losing position for the Democrats.
This is the kind of guy any of us would love to have as a father, older brother, uncle.
And yet he continues to be driven through the mud like an asshole.
Are we that far gone as a country? I hear these statements "oh this just like pre civil war rhetoric among the senate"
Seems too hyperbolic to me but if Kavanaugh is denied his seat off of some bullshit?? You are going to have some very hot citizens out there.
-
Seems too hyperbolic to me but if Kavanaugh is denied his seat off of some bullshit?? You are going to have some very hot citizens out there.
Fine with me.
And by the way, the people willing to go to war for our rights and freedoms are like 85% conservative, mostly white men without college degrees who live outside big cities (aka most of the population). The moment it looks like we might have a drop of unity in our system in the same style as BLM or MeToo - oh, and we're armed - the Left will back down. Who are they? "Antifa" (suburban white kids in skater shoes with skinnyjeans and masks), women (lol), and a few ballsy blacks and hispanics (most don't care enough about America to fight for it or against it). The moment we put our foot down, the war is over. It won't even be a war. One day later they'd all come to the table and start making concessions and begging us to hold our fire and let's talk about this and please guys don't turn the streets into a bloodbath etc. They're all talk. Those arrogant female senators like Harris and Hirono would sing a different tune, hell they'd shit a 7lb brick, if they were suddenly confronted by 30 rednecks and patriots in a hallway and shoved into a corner.
-
The hysterical maniac who scared dickless Jeff Flake into reversing his own vote. This is how the Left does things - not through process or discussion, but blunt force trauma, embarrassing emotional explosions in public, shutting down committee hearings with violent heckling and being dragged out, accosting and savaging public officials at restaurants with their families, and mindless paroxysms of rage on camera (bought and paid for by CNN).
I stated earlier on this...With all the facts currently available, if he votes no on this he has officially destroyed his life.
Being accosted by some cock eyed nut case lefties is one thing but for him to operate in the circles that he does, with real life conservative men and women, from the local business owner to the local Republican politician and all the way up to the very top, he will be branded a coward and a traitor for the rest of his life.
-
Women are so fucking dumb. I'm surprised they even know how to operate a keyboard or the shift button to mash out those hashtags while they live a privileged, pampered existence in wealthy American cities while women who get burned alive or raped by convoys of government troops in Africa have no voice on Twitter.
#White women problems.
#Twitter psychologists
#HimToo
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
(https://i.postimg.cc/sD1c8N2X/Screenshot_2018-09-28_23.59.11.png)
-
The hysterical maniac who scared dickless Jeff Flake into reversing his own vote. This is how the Left does things - not through process or discussion, but blunt force trauma, embarrassing emotional explosions in public, shutting down committee hearings with violent heckling and being dragged out, accosting and savaging public officials at restaurants with their families, and mindless paroxysms of rage on camera (bought and paid for by CNN).
“4th floor: pink pussy hats, discounted Sarah Mclachlan CDs, and women’s XXL clothing.”
-
What a mess this entire process has been.
I personally think a constitutional amendment is needed. Something to streamline the nomination process and prevent it from being sidetrack, blocked, or perverted to suit the political agenda of a small number of unscrupulous senators. This is NOT acceptable and is NOT what the founding fathers wanted.
-
Fine. Give them their f'g investigation. Naturally they're gonna want a week or more and continue to lay on the demands even though they've already stated 3 days would suffice siting the Hill case. Again, another cave in by (R) making them appear spineless. Careful what you wish for folks. kavanaugh has nothing to worry about. Ford's entire past sexual history will be out on display for public consumption.
An FBI investigation was the only right answer. I mean.. what's the hurry?
-
An FBI investigation was the only right answer. I mean.. what's the hurry?
Yeah, what's the hurry
there's only a major election 5 weeks away
you know, the kind that changes the configuration of the chamber tasked with selecting supreme court nominees
-
Yeah, what's the hurry
there's only a major election 5 weeks away
you know, the kind that changes the configuration of the chamber tasked with selecting supreme court nominees
5 weeks minus 1 week equals 4 weeks, or 1 month. So again I ask.. what's the hurry? Unless you don't care what the truth is. I mean the NPR poll states 54% of Republicans don't care if he did exactly what he is accused of, they would still vote for him.. so maybe we are spinning our wheels
-
5 weeks minus 1 week equals 4 weeks, or 1 month. So again I ask.. what's the hurry? Unless you don't care what the truth is. I mean the NPR poll states 54% of Republicans don't care if he did exactly what he is accused of, they would still vote for him.. so maybe we are spinning our wheels
they could've called for an FBI investigation 2 months ago, they've known since July
they waited until the last minute of the hearings, when it appeared he'd be approved
then this morning they left the hearing moments after it started when their vote to keep it in committee and off the floor was defeat
then they held a publicity stunt news conference outside to denounce the process and the man who is (as yet) innocent
then they sent hysterical metoo plants to bully jeff flake into voting for them
oh, and I should add that 100% of democrats think he's guilty
that doesn't even begin to describe the anti-Kavanaugh hysteria on mainstream tv outlets, daytime talktime shows, and the millions of haters and wackjob on social media
but let's focus on 54% of republicans who did none of the above, they're clearly the problem
::)
-
they could've called for an FBI investigation 2 months ago, they've known since July
they waited until the last minute of the hearings, when it appeared he'd be approved
then this morning they left the hearing moments after it started when their vote to keep it in committee and off the floor was defeat
then they held a publicity stunt news conference outside to denounce the process and the man who is (as yet) innocent
then they sent hysterical metoo plants to bully jeff flake into voting for them
oh, and I should add that 100% of democrats think he's guilty
that doesn't even begin to describe the anti-Kavanaugh hysteria on mainstream tv outlets, daytime talktime shows, and the millions of haters and wackjob on social media
but let's focus on 54% of republicans who did none of the above, they're clearly the problem
::)
:)
-
:)
see
you're cooling down
and you're tiring down
now we can have a civilized conversation and talk this out like adults over a beer or a coffee
tell me, why can't our elected officials do the same thing?
-
see
you're cooling down
and you're tiring down
now we can have a civilized conversation and talk this out like adults over a beer or a coffee
tell me, why can't our elected officials do the same thing?
I'm always cool. I'm always open to a discussion where both parties are honest, and open. I think our elected officials on both sides, in many cases, are so focused "winning" and staying the party line that they can't entertain any idea that conflicts with their position. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant
-
My mantra is "what is the truth". Even if it doesn't match what I think.. I want to think I am open to it. And on many occasions in my life I have had to adjust my position because the facts didn't match my position. I am fallible, but not on purpose
-
::)
(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/1E6E/production/_103609770_imagefromios.jpg)
Any of these people have jobs?
(https://i.postimg.cc/4dXttsNW/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.14.54.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/G2zDxV4d/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.00.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/fyL92CdX/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.13.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/j2FJGf61/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.19.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/pXmjK0RM/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.27.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/66jR2ssh/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.38.png)
-
::)
(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/1E6E/production/_103609770_imagefromios.jpg)
If she told me she ate a stack of pancakes for breakfast, a double cheeseburger with fries for lunch and lasagna for dinner... i would probably believe her
-
If she told me she ate a stack of pancakes for breakfast, a double cheeseburger with fries for lunch and lasagna for dinner... i would probably believe her
Okay so how are you feeling about this whole process?
Does Brett Kavanaugh deserve to sit on the Supreme Court bench?
-
(http://digitalspyuk.cdnds.net/16/35/480x240/landscape-1472883545-obama.gif)
(https://i.postimg.cc/Kzs7tjpm/Screenshot_2018-09-29_04.24.29.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/vB92Sn1H/Screenshot_2018-09-29_04.34.19.png)
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/24/woman-jailed-10-years-false-rape-claims-jemma-beale (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/24/woman-jailed-10-years-false-rape-claims-jemma-beale)
(https://i.postimg.cc/d067YHzh/Screenshot_2018-09-29_05.03.30.png)
-
If the cops believed her, they'll believe "Dr" Ford too. HTH. ;)
The woman who confronted Flake in the elevator works for Soros.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-who-confronted-flake-in-elevator-runs-soros-funded-organization/ (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-who-confronted-flake-in-elevator-runs-soros-funded-organization/)
-
Woman accuses Washington state lawmaker of rape based on "Dr" Ford's testimony. ::)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/29/woman-accuses-washington-lawmaker-ford-testimony-joe-fain (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/29/woman-accuses-washington-lawmaker-ford-testimony-joe-fain)
-
Flake is a fucking deep state cuckold
-
Flake is a fucking deep state cuckold
Walking around in a daze with that 1000 yard stare like he just got molested by his uncle.
(https://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Jeff+Flake+Senate+Judiciary+Committee+Holds+V6a5-JRDojkl.jpg)
-
5 weeks minus 1 week equals 4 weeks, or 1 month. So again I ask.. what's the hurry? Unless you don't care what the truth is. I mean the NPR poll states 54% of Republicans don't care if he did exactly what he is accused of, they would still vote for him.. so maybe we are spinning our wheels
None of these leftist windbags give a shit about the truth
-
If the cops believed her, they'll believe "Dr" Ford too. HTH. ;)
The woman who confronted Flake in the elevator works for Soros.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-who-confronted-flake-in-elevator-runs-soros-funded-organization/ (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-who-confronted-flake-in-elevator-runs-soros-funded-organization/)
She should've been arrested. That was a Members Only elevator - NO PRESS, NO PUBLIC. Security was trying to remove her as she continued to scream and refusing to get out.
-
::)
(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/1E6E/production/_103609770_imagefromios.jpg)
Any of these people have jobs?
(https://i.postimg.cc/4dXttsNW/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.14.54.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/G2zDxV4d/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.00.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/fyL92CdX/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.13.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/j2FJGf61/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.19.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/pXmjK0RM/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.27.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/66jR2ssh/Screenshot_2018-09-29_03.15.38.png)
Not a single hot chick. Weird.
-
An FBI investigation was the only right answer. I mean.. what's the hurry?
Why would an FBI investigation, costing US taxpayers how much, be the only answer? If any of the lying sacks of shit that accused Brett of these sexual assaults had any type of corroboration to their stories, maybe, but so many people close to these she-beasts have blatantly denied and shot down their stories, their credibility is nil.
Don't you think if one of those liars had irrefutable evidence, the demoncrats would have plastered that all over the media before the sham of a hearing?
Huge stall tactic, waste of time and taxpayer dollars.
-
Why would an FBI investigation, costing US taxpayers how much, be the only answer? If any of the lying sacks of shit that accused Brett of these sexual assaults had any type of corroboration to their stories, maybe, but so many people close to these she-beasts have blatantly denied and shot down their stories, their credibility is nil.
Don't you think if one of those liars had irrefutable evidence, the demoncrats would have plastered that all over the media before the sham of a hearing?
Huge stall tactic, waste of time and taxpayer dollars.
for 3 reasons. 1. He is picked for a lifetime position on the Supreme court. I don't know about you, but I want someone with at least a modem of ethics and integrity in that position. So if he is accused by more than one person of doing something inappropriate, and he denies it, that is a potential credibility issue. If it takes a week to resolve, its a week out of a lifetime appointment. Shouldn't be that big of a deal.
2. Republicans are supposed to pretend they are the morally superior party. would think it would be in their best interest to at least pretend they care if this guy is lying.
And 3. FBI is tasked with background investigations. At any point, new info comes to light about a nominee, it stands to reason they should look into it. If not, what's the point of the background investigations?
When I hear you complain about Trumps golfing, I will take your taxpayer concern a little more seriously
-
for 3 reasons. 1. He is picked for a lifetime position on the Supreme court. I don't know about you, but I want someone with at least a modem of ethics and integrity in that position. So if he is accused by more than one person of doing something inappropriate, and he denies it, that is a potential credibility issue. If it takes a week to resolve, its a week out of a lifetime appointment. Shouldn't be that big of a deal.
2. Republicans are supposed to pretend they are the morally superior party. would think it would be in their best interest to at least pretend they care if this guy is lying.
And 3. FBI is tasked with background investigations. At any point, new info comes to light about a nominee, it stands to reason they should look into it. If not, what's the point of the background investigations?
When I hear you complain about Trumps golfing, I will take your taxpayer concern a little more seriously
The appointments shouldn't be for life there should be
An upper age limit
A max of 10/ 15yrs
And a check on their decision making / mental soundness every few years
Ahhhh & I thought it was the democraps & leftist that were the moralists with
All their protesting & liberal rights Bollocks.
Oh and Trumps Golfing appears to have worked wonders on the economy / employment
His Presidency rating & many other things... I must admit I never Though Golfing would've
had such a dramatic Favourable impact on so many things. ;D
-
for 3 reasons. 1. He is picked for a lifetime position on the Supreme court. I don't know about you, but I want someone with at least a modem of ethics and integrity in that position. So if he is accused by more than one person of doing something inappropriate, and he denies it, that is a potential credibility issue. If it takes a week to resolve, its a week out of a lifetime appointment. Shouldn't be that big of a deal.
2. Republicans are supposed to pretend they are the morally superior party. would think it would be in their best interest to at least pretend they care if this guy is lying.
And 3. FBI is tasked with background investigations. At any point, new info comes to light about a nominee, it stands to reason they should look into it. If not, what's the point of the background investigations?
When I hear you complain about Trumps golfing, I will take your taxpayer concern a little more seriously
It should be obvious at this point who the unhinged nuts are.
(https://liberalsbackwardsthink.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/trumps-head.jpg)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-qfzqBr1qh0/maxresdefault.jpg)
(http://usdefensewatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/fcd8a870-e958-11e6-a4bd-657b38259212_violent-protests-erupt-uc-berkeley-20170202.jpg)
(https://s24989.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/download-67-780x392.jpg)
Quoted for Accuracy
;D
-
The appointments shouldn't be for life there should be
An upper age limit
A max of 10/ 15yrs
And a check on their decision making / mental soundness every few years
Ahhhh & I thought it was the democraps & leftist that were the moralists with
All their protesting & liberal rights Bollocks.
Oh and Trumps Golfing appears to have worked wonders on the economy / employment
His Presidency rating & many other things... I must admit I never Though Golfing would've
had such a dramatic Favourable impact on so many things. ;D
;D
-
for 3 reasons. 1. He is picked for a lifetime position on the Supreme court. I don't know about you, but I want someone with at least a modem of ethics and integrity in that position. So if he is accused by more than one person of doing something inappropriate, and he denies it, that is a potential credibility issue. If it takes a week to resolve, its a week out of a lifetime appointment. Shouldn't be that big of a deal.
2. Republicans are supposed to pretend they are the morally superior party. would think it would be in their best interest to at least pretend they care if this guy is lying.
And 3. FBI is tasked with background investigations. At any point, new info comes to light about a nominee, it stands to reason they should look into it. If not, what's the point of the background investigations?
When I hear you complain about Trumps golfing, I will take your taxpayer concern a little more seriously
#1 It should never be a lifetime appointment. Have ALL accusations towards nominees been investigated by the FBI?
#2 Really? Cause if you see 99% of media sources, they seem to portray the dems as some sort of saints that are battling the evil repubs.
#3 FBI should be used to investigate crimes the have some sort of evidence attached, this accusation has nothing, zero, zilch, nada, nil
As far as you dragging Trumps golf time in as a show of wasted taxpayer dollars, that's just you trying to deflect from the fact that deep down inside you agree this chick is a liar and this whole charade is just bullshit to push out the confirmation until after midterms.
-
Sex-Crimes Prosecutor: Claims From Ford Against Judge Kavanaugh Lack Sufficient Evidence
Rachel Mitchell said in a memo to senators, ‘I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.’
(https://images.wsj.net/im-28733?width=1260&aspect_ratio=1.5)
Oct. 1, 2018
The sex-crimes prosecutor hired by the Senate Judiciary Committee to question Christine Blasey Ford about her allegations of assault against Brett Kavanaugh told the panel she wouldn’t have prosecuted the case, according to documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Rachel Mitchell, an Arizona prosecutor for more than two decades whom Republicans hired for last Thursday’s hearing with Dr. Ford and the Supreme Court nominee, told senators on the panel in a memo Sunday that a reasonable prosecutor wouldn’t proceed because of a lack of sufficient evidence.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/sex-crimes-prosecutor-claims-from-ford-against-judge-kavanaugh-lack-sufficient-evidence-1538369619
READ THE MEMO:
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/
-
Lacks any evidence at all.
-
Lacks any evidence at all.
you're an attorney. Is testimony from a plaintiff considered direct evidence? Yes or no
Would documents supporting an excessive drinking lifestyle that supported the plaintiffs claim the defendant was staggeringly intoxicated at the time of the assault be considered circumstantial evidence? Yes or no
So while you may consider the evidence to be weak, to say there is no evidence at all is simply a lie.
-
Sex-Crimes Prosecutor: Claims From Ford Against Judge Kavanaugh Lack Sufficient Evidence
Rachel Mitchell said in a memo to senators, ‘I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.’
(https://images.wsj.net/im-28733?width=1260&aspect_ratio=1.5)
Oct. 1, 2018
The sex-crimes prosecutor hired by the Senate Judiciary Committee to question Christine Blasey Ford about her allegations of assault against Brett Kavanaugh told the panel she wouldn’t have prosecuted the case, according to documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Rachel Mitchell, an Arizona prosecutor for more than two decades whom Republicans hired for last Thursday’s hearing with Dr. Ford and the Supreme Court nominee, told senators on the panel in a memo Sunday that a reasonable prosecutor wouldn’t proceed because of a lack of sufficient evidence.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/sex-crimes-prosecutor-claims-from-ford-against-judge-kavanaugh-lack-sufficient-evidence-1538369619
READ THE MEMO:
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/
Right between the eyes. Don't believe an allegation just because it comes from a female. Believe evidence, regardless of gender.
-
Republicans Are Planning To Vote On Brett Kavanaugh By The End Of The Week
An additional FBI investigation into accusations against the Supreme Court nominee is supposed to be completed Friday.
Paul McLeod
BuzzFeed News Reporter
Posted on October 1, 2018
Senate Republicans are planning to vote on confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court by the end of the week, right after the FBI investigation into his past is set to conclude.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Monday on the Senate floor that “we’ll be voting this week” on Kavanaugh’s confirmation. He had initially planned to have the nomination wrapped up early this week, but that was delayed when Sen. Jeff Flake called for, and won, a one-week delay during which the FBI is investigating sexual harassment complaints against Kavanaugh.
Flake’s stand took place last Friday. The FBI was given a maximum of one week to investigate, meaning the background check could be made available to senators as late as this Friday.
Confirmation will require two votes in total. McConnell could schedule a cloture vote Friday or Saturday, which signals the end of debate. From that point on there will be up to 30 hours of debate before a final confirmation vote. Kavanaugh will need 51 votes on each of those to move forward.
Republicans have a thin 51-seat majority in the Senate and Vice President Mike Pence to break a tie. If all Democrats oppose Kavanaugh, it would take just two Republicans to sink the nomination.
Flake had actually announced he would support the Kavanaugh nomination Friday morning before saying the process needed to be slowed down. Even after winning a one-week FBI investigation, Flake told reporters that he is a conservative, like Kavanaugh, and hopes to vote yes on the nomination. But Flake said over the weekend that if Kavanaugh is found to have lied under oath he should not be confirmed. On Monday he said the FBI should investigate all “credible” allegations thoroughly.
“It does no good to have an investigation that gives us more cover,” he said at an event in Boston.
Only two other Republicans — Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins — have not declared their stance.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/republicans-kavanaugh-vote-fbi-investigation
-
you're an attorney. Is testimony from a plaintiff considered direct evidence? Yes or no
Would documents supporting an excessive drinking lifestyle that supported the plaintiffs claim the defendant was staggeringly intoxicated at the time of the assault be considered circumstantial evidence? Yes or no
So while you may consider the evidence to be weak, to say there is no evidence at all is simply a lie.
Other than her accusation & testimony there is NO Evidence.
She can’t / couldnt remember when it was
Where it was
How she got to the party
How she got home
Her 4 “witness's Don’t confirm her story
And She hasn’t previously named him when having counselling
Only now he’s nominated & about to be appointed
She knows it was Him... ::) yeah right of course she does,
And I have a Lovely Bridge for Sale. ;D
-
So now that these sexual assault allegations have blown up, the issue is whether Kavanaugh drank too much in high school. Democrats have turned this process into a partisan national disgrace.
Byron York: In Kavanaugh fight, Democrats move goalposts far, far away
by Byron York
September 30, 2018
Ask any casual observer what the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation fight is about, and the answer will be the allegation that at a high-school party 36 years ago, when Kavanaugh was 17, he drunkenly forced then-15-year-old Christine Ford onto a bed, tried to undress her, and, when she tried to scream, covered her mouth with his hand.
That is now old news. In the last 48 hours, immediately after Senate Republicans and President Trump agreed to Democratic demands that the FBI investigate the 1982 incident, the Kavanaugh goalposts have moved dramatically. Now, a key issue is Kavanaugh's teenage drinking, and whether he testified truthfully to Congress about the amount of beer he consumed in high school and college more than three decades ago, and the effect it had on him.
Just look at the headlines:
Policy Bosses: NASA's Jim Bridenstine says America needs to be first, even in space
Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads
"Yale Classmate Accuses Kavanaugh of 'Blatant Mischaracterization' of His Drinking." (New York Times)
"Another Yale classmate breaks silence: Kavanaugh lied." (CNN)
"Brett Kavanaugh's College Friends Say He Lied Under Oath About Drinking." (NBC)
And many others. The allegation is that at last Thursday's hearing, Kavanaugh lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee when he was asked about his drinking practices both in high school and at Yale University. Kavanaugh was under oath at the time.
"Lying to Congress is a federal crime," Sen. Bernie Sanders noted in a letter to Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley. "Kavanaugh's truthfulness with the Senate goes to the very heart of whether he should be confirmed to the court."
The new developments raised two questions. One, did Kavanaugh actually lie to the Senate about his drinking? And two, why are Democrats, now that they have finally won the FBI investigation they wanted into the sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh, suddenly making a bigger deal of his drinking?
On the first, Kavanaugh clearly told the Senate he drank in high school and college. He told the Senate he sometimes drank to excess. But he said he did not black out, nor did he drink so much that he could not remember events that took place while he was drinking.
"I drank beer with my friends," Kavanaugh testified. "Almost everyone did. Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer. But I did not drink beer to the point of blacking out, and I never sexually assaulted anyone."
That was pretty clear. Kavanaugh repeated it all when the Republican-appointed prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, questioned him.
"Yes, we drank beer," he said. "My friends and I, the boys and girls. Yes, we drank beer. I liked beer. Still like beer. We drank beer. The drinking age, as I noted, was 18, so the seniors were legal, senior year in high school, people were legal to drink, and we — yeah, we drank beer, and I said sometimes — sometimes probably had too many beers, and sometimes other people had too many beers."
Mitchell pressed Kavanaugh on whether he sometimes drank so much that he forgot what he did when he was drinking.
"Have you ever passed out from drinking?"
"I — passed out would be — no, but I've gone to sleep, but — but I've never blacked out," Kavanaugh said. "That's the — that's the — the allegation, and that — that — that's wrong."
"So let's talk about your time in high school," Mitchell said. "In high school, after drinking, did you ever wake up in a different location than you remembered passing out or going to sleep?"
"No, no."
"Did you ever wake up with your clothes in a different condition, or fewer clothes on than you remembered when you went to sleep or passed out?"
"No, no."
"Did you ever tell — did anyone ever tell you about something that happened in your presence that you didn't remember during a time that you had been drinking?"
"No..."
"During the time in high school when you would be drinking, did anyone ever tell you about something that you did not remember?"
"No."
Later in the hearing, Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar picked up the questioning. "Drinking is one thing, but the concern is about truthfulness, and in your written testimony, you said sometimes you had too many drinks. Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn't remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?"
"No, I — no," Kavanaugh answered. "I remember what happened, and I think you've probably had beers, senator, and — and so I..."
"So you're saying there's never been a case where you drank so much that you didn't remember what happened the night before, or part of what happened?"
"It's — you're asking about, you know, blackout," Kavanaugh said. "I don't know. Have you?"
"Could you answer the question, judge? I just — so you — that's not happened. Is that your answer?"
"Yeah, and I'm curious if you have," Kavanaugh said.
"I have no drinking problem, judge."
"Yeah, nor do I."
Some Democrats and their allies in the press suggested Kavanaugh lied in his exchanges with Mitchell and the Democratic senators. But how? Kavanaugh was quite open about the fact that he drank in high school and in college, and also about the fact that he sometimes drank too much. He denied having alcohol-related blackouts, but said he had "gone to sleep" after drinking. On another occasion, responding to Klobuchar, he said "I don't know" when asked if he had ever drunk so much that he didn't remember what happened the night before. It's hard to see where the "federal crime," as Sen. Sanders put it, is in that testimony.
But by Sunday night, the Washington Post reported that "many Democrats have called for the FBI to take a broader look at whether Kavanaugh may have misled senators by minimizing his carousing behavior in high school and college."
Both the Post and the New York Times featured statements by a man named Charles Ludington, who was a classmate of Kavanaugh's at Yale and is now a professor at North Carolina State University. (He has written an academic history of wine.) Ludington said that in college Kavanaugh was "a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker." Ludington said he had heard Kavanaugh "slur his words" and saw him "staggering from alcohol consumption." (Ludington said he knew that because "I often drank with him.")
"When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive," Ludington continued. "On one of the last occasions I purposely socialized with Brett, I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man's face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail."
Ludington said he was going to take his tale of a 35-year-old scuffle to the FBI for further investigation, to show that Kavanaugh lied under oath to the Senate. "I can unequivocally say that in denying the possibility that he ever blacked out from drinking, and in downplaying the degree and frequency of his drinking, Brett has not told the truth," Ludington said.
The problem is, there is nothing in Ludington's statement that actually contradicts Kavanaugh's testimony. As noted, Kavanaugh testified that he drank plenty. And Ludington did not say that he, Ludington, ever witnessed Kavanaugh blacked out or passed out from alcohol. It is unclear what, if anything, the FBI would do with such a presentation from Ludington. But such stories are causing great excitement in Democratic Washington at the moment.
Why? The answer is the theory behind the Democratic attacks on Kavanaugh.
The most serious allegation against Kavanaugh is, of course, Christine Ford's. (To a lesser extent, there is also accuser Deborah Ramirez's claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in a college drinking session, and to an even lesser extent, there is the gang rape allegation of Michael Avenatti client Julie Swetnick, which is not taken very seriously by either Democrats or Republicans.)
Kavanaugh has strongly and unequivocally denied the Ford allegation. The problem for Democrats is that there is no contemporaneous evidence to support Ford's claim. By her own account, Ford told no one of what happened at the time. She told no one in the next few years. No one in the next few decades. No one for 30 years, until, in 2012, when Ford says she told her therapist what had happened to her long ago.
The people Ford claims were at the home where she says Kavanaugh attacked her, including one close friend of Ford's, have said they have no memories that support her account.
So the Ford case is quite hard to make. And that is where, for Democrats, Kavanaugh's supposed blackouts come in. With no contemporaneous evidence that the Ford attack happened, Democrats are trying to make the case that it could have happened. What if Kavanaugh got drunk, attacked Ford, and later didn't remember that he did it?
That is the theory behind some Democratic senators' questioning of Kavanaugh last week. The idea was to get Kavanaugh to admit alcohol-induced memory loss and thus undermine his firm contention that he did not do what Ford alleged. How could he really know? He himself admitted that he sometimes drank so much he couldn't remember what happened the night before. He could have attacked Christine Ford in an alcoholic blackout and never remember that he did it.
The problem, of course, is that is all anti-Kavanaugh theorizing. There's no evidence to support it, just as there is no evidence beyond Christine Ford's word to support the original attack allegation. But it's what Democrats have to work with right now, and it's why they are trying to change the subject from alleged sexual misconduct to Kavanaugh's teenage drinking.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-in-kavanaugh-fight-democrats-move-goalposts-far-far-away
-
So now they are delaying the vote for one week for an FBI investigation.
My prediction: the FBI will get statements that repeat what the witnesses have already said. Not a single Democrat will change his or her vote. Ford will file a criminal complaint with the state of Maryland. Democrats will demand a delay until after the state completes its investigation.
And Kavanaugh will be confirmed week after next.
Not sure Ford could file a criminal complaint. The statute of limitations in Maryland for a felony is 5 years. Misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment has no statute of limitations. It's best to have criminal trials as soon after an incident as possible. She might be able to file a civil suit, but her chance of prevailing is almost no chance whatsoever.
-
This pretty much sums up the common sense interpretation of these events:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1046554824895066112
And, before anyone comments on the source, I got it via twitter, and it doesn't matter, it's the man's words I'm referring to.
-
Not sure Ford could file a criminal complaint. The statute of limitations in Maryland for a felony is 5 years. Misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment has no statute of limitations. It's best to have criminal trials as soon after an incident as possible. She might be able to file a civil suit, but her chance of prevailing is almost no chance whatsoever.
denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance... ;D
-
" Third Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick just validated claims that she should be criminally prosecuted for lying in her initial sworn account alleging that Trump SCOTUS pick Brett Kavanaugh participated in "gang rapes" with his high school buddies back in the early 1980s.
In an interview with NBC news, Swetnick said that while she saw Kavanaugh aggressively hit on women at parties, she denied that she actually witnessed him participate in the rapes. She also said Kavanaugh wasn't a member of a group of boys who assaulted her during one of these parties.
"I cannot specifically say that he was one of the ones who assaulted me," Swetnick told Snow. "But, before this happened to me, at that party, I saw Brett Kavanaugh there, I saw Mark Judge, and they were hanging out about where I started to feel disoriented and where the room was and where the other boys were hanging out and laughing."
She added that Kavanaugh is an "admitted blackout drunk and drug addict."
Swetnick did not confirm that she saw Kavanaugh spike punch, one of the claims from her affidavit, she instead said that she merely "saw him around punch containers," and that she wouldn't have accepted a glass of punch if he were to hand it to her.
"I don’t know what he did," she added.
NBC was unable to corroborate Swetnick's claims after she provided four names to NBC News of people whom she said would confirm her accounts of the parties in the 1980s. After contacting all four, NBC reported that one said they did not remember Swetnick, one was dead and two did not respond. "
LOCK. HER. UP.
-
denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance... ;D
denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance... Not sure it's acceptance so much as logic, but I thought I should give you one point. :) The other points don't apply to me since I never gave a shit about all this crap or Kavanaugh. If I've learned nothing else in 74 years, I've learned what I can control and what I can't and that most things have a way of working out in the long run despite what any of us thinks, does or says.
Note: The amount of things any of us can control is negligible.
-
So while you may consider the evidence to be weak, to say there is no evidence at all is simply a lie.
And what exactly is this weak evidence?
-
Demoncrats(https://media.giphy.com/media/kKqozJnYzWnmM/giphy.gif)
-
Right between the eyes. Don't believe an allegation just because it comes from a female. Believe evidence, regardless of gender.
I agree, at this time, it is not prosecutable. Don't misinterpret that from it didn't happen
-
Other than her accusation & testimony there is NO Evidence.
She can’t / couldnt remember when it was
Where it was
How she got to the party
How she got home
Her 4 “witness's Don’t confirm her story
And She hasn’t previously named him when having counselling
Only now he’s nominated & about to be appointed
She knows it was Him... ::) yeah right of course she does,
And I have a Lovely Bridge for Sale. ;D
Your first sentence disproves Souls statement
-
Not sure Ford could file a criminal complaint. The statute of limitations in Maryland for a felony is 5 years. Misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment has no statute of limitations. It's best to have criminal trials as soon after an incident as possible. She might be able to file a civil suit, but her chance of prevailing is almost no chance whatsoever.
I think you are incorrect. But from what I read, a felony sexual assault has no time limit. but I suspect her incident would fall under the 1 year misdemeanor statute. But I could be wrong. I do agree with your assessment that after so long, it is unlikely anyone could reach a conclusion in a court proceeding. But this is really about his fitness for a Supreme Court position.
-
And what exactly is this weak evidence?
Her testimony is considered evidence. He is a lawyer from what people on here say, so he should be aware of that. The yearbook, with its entries, notations is also considered evidence. My issue is that a lawyer who should know better, says it lacks any evidence. That simply is not true
-
Minds are pretty much made up. I will attempt to refrain from commenting further until the Senate votes. I have said about all I can say. Anything more will devolve into a tit for tat and I'd rather not go there. Its a politically divisive issue and emotions can be strong. Again, I am just giving an opinion. I wasn't there. I try to evaluate the information as much as possible and determine what likely is the truth. And Illuminati, I agree 100% a lifetime appointment is ludicrous. I also think there should be a cap on age in Congress.
-
Not sure Ford could file a criminal complaint. The statute of limitations in Maryland for a felony is 5 years. Misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment has no statute of limitations. It's best to have criminal trials as soon after an incident as possible. She might be able to file a civil suit, but her chance of prevailing is almost no chance whatsoever.
There's this interpretation of Maryland law:
Back on September 19th, the Washington Post ran an article written by Thiru Vignarajah, the former Deputy Attorney General of Maryland. You can’t be much more of an expert on Maryland state law than this guy is. Here’s part of what he wrote:
"Attempting a sexual assault with the aid of another person counts as attempted first-degree rape, just as restricting a victim’s breathing to stop her from shouting for help could fairly qualify as first-degree assault. Both are felonies with no statute of limitations in Maryland. Likewise, under Maryland law, using force to move a victim a short distance, even from one room to another, can amount to kidnapping, a crime that similarly has no limitations period. There are examples across the country where convictions for kidnapping have been upheld in cases where rapists took the victim just to a separate room to commit the crime."
https://www.palmerreport.com/factcheck/statute-limitations-maryland-brett-kavanaugh/13135/
We just have to wait and see how far they take the statute of humiliation.
-
There's this interpretation of Maryland law:
Back on September 19th, the Washington Post ran an article written by Thiru Vignarajah, the former Deputy Attorney General of Maryland. You can’t be much more of an expert on Maryland state law than this guy is. Here’s part of what he wrote:
"Attempting a sexual assault with the aid of another person counts as attempted first-degree rape, just as restricting a victim’s breathing to stop her from shouting for help could fairly qualify as first-degree assault. Both are felonies with no statute of limitations in Maryland. Likewise, under Maryland law, using force to move a victim a short distance, even from one room to another, can amount to kidnapping, a crime that similarly has no limitations period. There are examples across the country where convictions for kidnapping have been upheld in cases where rapists took the victim just to a separate room to commit the crime."
https://www.palmerreport.com/factcheck/statute-limitations-maryland-brett-kavanaugh/13135/
We just have to wait and see how far they take the statute of humiliation.
Awesome post with great information. Thank you. I have wondered since reading the Maryland statutes what they would consider a felony sexual assault and your post explains it. The issue always is, with time, I mean the longer a victim waits, in any type case the lesser their chances of success, that after 38 years, even if he did it... it would be near impossible to meet "beyond a reasonable doubt" in a court environment
In reading the article, it says the door is wide open to Ford pressing charges. The problem then becomes, when it is staffed with the DA who would try the case, would they say insufficient evidence. No DA ever wants to take a case they might lose and this one would be a special "Ah hell no". And frankly I wouldn't blame him or her. Doesn't mean it didn't happen, just means it would be impossible to reach that "Beyond a reasonable doubt" bar at this time
-
I think you are incorrect. But from what I read, a felony sexual assault has no time limit. but I suspect her incident would fall under the 1 year misdemeanor statute. But I could be wrong. I do agree with your assessment that after so long, it is unlikely anyone could reach a conclusion in a court proceeding. But this is really about his fitness for a Supreme Court position.
I could be. I've been wrong before. Here's the link to my source, check it out and give us your take. https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html (https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html)
Moontrane has provided a very comprehensive account of the current statute of limitations rules in Maryland which apparently proves me wrong.
-
Minds are pretty much made up. I will attempt to refrain from commenting further until the Senate votes. I have said about all I can say. Anything more will devolve into a tit for tat and I'd rather not go there. Its a politically divisive issue and emotions can be strong. Again, I am just giving an opinion. I wasn't there. I try to evaluate the information as much as possible and determine what likely is the truth. And Illuminati, I agree 100% a lifetime appointment is ludicrous. I also think there should be a cap on age in Congress.
Too bad you've decided to bow out of this issue. Where's the fun in that? ;)
As for 100% lifetime appointments, no term limits and age caps, you also have my complete agreement. Sometimes I wondered in the last year or so if Trump and his clan will figure out how to give him a lifetime appointment as dictator of the U.S., much like his boyfriend Kim Jong-un has in North Korea....or he'll rig the vote like his buddy Putin has in order to maintain his "tandemocracy". Remember Fidel Castro....in until you're about to die.
-
I could be. I've been wrong before. Here's the link to my source, check it out and give us your take. https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html (https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html)
Moontrane has provided a very comprehensive account of the current statute of limitations rules in Maryland which apparently proves me wrong.
I think your link and info is outdated or incomplete. My info is no limitation on Felony Sexual Assault. 1 year on misdemeanor offenses. According to a Former Attorney General via Moontranes. post. what happened to her would fit the No SOL criteria.
-
Too bad you've decided to bow out of this issue. Where's the fun in that? ;)
As for 100% lifetime appointments, no term limits and age caps, you also have my complete agreement. Sometimes I wondered in the last year or so if Trump and his clan will figure out how to give him a lifetime appointment as dictator of the U.S., much like his boyfriend Kim Jong-un has in North Korea....or he'll rig the vote like his buddy Putin has in order to maintain his "tandemocracy". Remember Fidel Castro....in until you're about to die.
I have to evaluate my participation and I admit, I like a good debate. But I am trying to ween myself from the arguments where there is never a winner or it becomes hostile. I don't enjoy those. And honestly, this issue for me is so partisan that it is ridiculous, and having worked with sexual assault victims it is difficult for me to make it a game of politics. I could be wrong. Been wrong before. But to me the person telling the truth in this is clear, and I would like to think I would say this if parties were reversed.
-
I have to evaluate my participation and I admit, I like a good debate. But I am trying to ween myself from the arguments where there is never a winner or it becomes hostile. I don't enjoy those. And honestly, this issue for me is so partisan that it is ridiculous, and having worked with sexual assault victims it is difficult for me to make it a game of politics. I could be wrong. Been wrong before. But to me the person telling the truth in this is clear, and I would like to think I would say this if parties were reversed.
Let's turn 250 years of precedent on its head and adopt the Egyptian system. You don't hear MeToo boarding flights to protest the treatment of women there. You know why? Because over there, they lock you up for the bullshit women do in the United States:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/egypt-sends-actress-to-jail-for-spreading-fake-news-over-sexual-harassment-1538222090 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/egypt-sends-actress-to-jail-for-spreading-fake-news-over-sexual-harassment-1538222090)
The MeToo cowards only attack in the safe space of America. Outside of it, they wouldn't last 2 fucking days.
-
REAL victim of sexual assault casts doubt on Kavanaugh accuser.
My name is Linda. I was sexually assaulted when I was 6 years old. I remember exactly where I was, what time it was, where it happened. I remember the furnishings in my home. I remember the tea pot on the stove. I remember what I was wearing. I remember where my friends were. I remember the day and I remember what the weather was like.
I was living in the projects back in those days in Washington State. I was a child. The only other person that knows of this is my mother. When I told her what happened, she filed charges against the old man that assaulted me.
We went to court. I was put on the stand. In front of a courtroom of people, in front of my accuser. The Judge who presided over that case asked me if I could state where the old man touched me, assaulted me, raped me. All I could say was “down there”.
Because I did not know the technical word for “down there” was a vagina, the man who assaulted me got off scott free. I was six years old. I remember every scintilla of details, even down to the clothing I was wearing.
The man who did this to me got away with it because I didn’t know what the word ‘vagina’ meant. I was 6 years old. My mother and I had to ride down an elevator with my assailant. I want the accuser of Brett Kavanaugh to be held to account.
When you are sexually assaulted, you never forget it. The date. The time. The place.
For the record… We verified this story with state records.
http://thepedogate.com/other/coming-out-victim-of-child-sexual-assault-and-rape-wants-kavanaugh-accuser-held-accountable/ (http://thepedogate.com/other/coming-out-victim-of-child-sexual-assault-and-rape-wants-kavanaugh-accuser-held-accountable/)
-
Avenatti's client, Julie Swetnick, held an interview recently with NBC News where she couldn't corroborate anything claimed by "Dr" Ford, and couldn't name a single person who had witnessed her doubtful claims about gang rapes and spiked punch (full interview available on YouTube, as well as videos focusing only on her contradictory statements and unsubstantiated claims).
Meanwhile her ex boyfriend of 7 years, who put a restraining order on her after she threatened to kill him and his unborn child when he broke up with her, stopped by Fox News's Laura Ingraham's show last night to share more information on this disturbing individual.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/fox-news-first-ex-boyfriend-of-1-kavanaugh-accuser-speaks-out-mcconnell-vows-final-kavanaugh-vote-this-week (https://www.foxnews.com/us/fox-news-first-ex-boyfriend-of-1-kavanaugh-accuser-speaks-out-mcconnell-vows-final-kavanaugh-vote-this-week)
-
No one really knew who this guy was until this shit came out it doesn't matter what side of the fence your on dem or rep this guy looked like shit during those hearings he had no composure he look like a weak beaten pussy cat sorry guilty or not he cannot be handed that much power no way wouldn't want my life left up to him...no spine weak
-
No one really knew who this guy was until this shit came out it doesn't matter what side of the fence your on dem or rep this guy looked like shit during those hearings he had no composure he look like a weak beaten pussy cat sorry guilty or not he cannot be handed that much power no way wouldn't want my life left up to him...no spine weak
We should be honest about this train wreck of a run on sentence.
You may have reached a new level here.
-
We should be honest about this train wreck of a run on sentence.
You may have reached a new level here.
Not to mention there's already a Kavanaugh thread, so why make a new one, especially this shitty? This isn't the G&O. Dos Equis will bleach this abomination of a thread when he sees it.
-
No one really knew who this guy was until this shit came out it doesn't matter what side of the fence your on dem or rep this guy looked like shit during those hearings he had no composure he look like a weak beaten pussy cat sorry guilty or not he cannot be handed that much power no way wouldn't want my life left up to him...no spine weak
lets be honest YOU really knew nothing
Obviously, you didn't see the confirmation hearings that began on Sept. 4th and the temper tantrums the left displayed the moment chair Chuck Grassley started the hearings.
-
Quoted for Accuracy
;D
what's wrong with killing fascists? america dubbed the set of people that were famous for killing fascists their "Greatest"
-
what's wrong with killing fascists? america dubbed the set of people that were famous for killing fascists their "Greatest"
That’s when fascism was on the right. It’s moved to the opposite end of the spectrum in the 21st century. Radical leftists are the new Nazis and unlike the old ones, these ones have the media and half the Congress in their back pocket.
-
Not sure Ford could file a criminal complaint. The statute of limitations in Maryland for a felony is 5 years. Misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment has no statute of limitations. It's best to have criminal trials as soon after an incident as possible. She might be able to file a civil suit, but her chance of prevailing is almost no chance whatsoever.
The ship has sailed. It is too late for her to sue him. And as the sex crimes prosecutor said, no reasonable prosecutor would file criminal charges.
-
Sparking Progressive Fury, Tom Perez Says DNC Would Continue to Back Any Democrat Who Votes for Kavanaugh
(https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2018/06/27/AP_18150677832401_c0-338-3300-2262_s885x516.jpg?b603376ca1ae6514cc22e8077e17e610da26f799)
Even as he continues to denounce Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh as an enormous threat to women and declare that the judge's sham confirmation process is a "vivid illustration" of why it's crucial for Democrats to retake the Senate in November, Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair Tom Perez outraged progressives on Friday by suggesting that the DNC would continue to stand behind any Democrat who decides to vote yes on Kavanaugh.
Asked by Wall Street Journal reporter Reid Epstein if the DNC would "continue to work to reelect Democratic senators if they vote" for Kavanaugh, Perez briefly ducked and dodged before finally answering, "Of course we're going to continue."
While several red-state Democrats who were previously viewed as possible yes votes for Kavanaugh—such as Sens. Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Jon Tester (Mont.), and Joe Donnelly (Ind.)—vowed to vote against his confirmation after hearing the compelling testimony of his accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) are still undecided.
Perez's remarks were quickly denounced by progressives as both an egregious political mistake and a betrayal of the millions of women and allies who have been working tirelessly to defeat Kavanaugh, who has been credibly accused of sexual assault.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.commondreams.org/news/2018/09/29/sparking-progressive-fury-tom-perez-says-dnc-would-continue-back-any-democrat-who%3famp
-
FBI to be done with probe tomorrow. Just enough time for Flake to get his offshore account set up.
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538511155
-
FBI to be done with probe tomorrow. Just enough time for Flake to get his offshore account set up.
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538511155
I was thinking right along those lines just a few hours ago.
Would not surprise me in the least.
-
I was thinking right along those lines just a few hours ago.
Would not surprise me in the least.
He turned on a dime, now saying that Kav is "too partisan" to be on the court....like all these justices had no political affiliations.
National level politicians are owned and have many masters. They spend millions of somebody else's $$$ to get elected. This ass is getting his severance package from the highest bidder.
-
He turned on a dime, now saying that Kav is "too partisan" to be on the court....like all these justices had no political affiliations.
National level politicians are owned and have many masters. They spend millions of somebody else's $$$ to get elected. This ass is getting his severance package from the highest bidder.
It's so depressing to think about. Especially when you consider Kavanaugh's family.
His body language and overall demeanor when asking for the FBI investigation.
The 1000 yard stare while walking the hallways afterwards.
Then he comes out with that sham of a "bipartisan" ::) interview.
He will be called out for the rest of his life though.
I still think there is a good chance Manchin caves and 3 or 4 other Democrats could as well.
Indiana, North Dakota and Missouri will most likely see some significant voter push back if they deny Kavanaugh.
Possibly Montana as well.
-
It's so depressing to think about. Especially when you consider Kavanaugh's family.
His body language and overall demeanor when asking for the FBI investigation.
The 1000 yard stare while walking the hallways afterwards.
Then he comes out with that sham of a "bipartisan" ::) interview.
He will be called out for the rest of his life though.
I still think there is a good chance Manchin caves and 3 or 4 other Democrats could as well.
Indiana, North Dakota and Missouri will most likely see some significant voter push back if they deny Kavanaugh.
Possibly Montana as well.
Well, Tom Perez is a total far left nut so if he is conceding that a Dem yes vote is not an issue there must be something to get in front of.
-
Her testimony is considered evidence. He is a lawyer from what people on here say, so he should be aware of that. The yearbook, with its entries, notations is also considered evidence. My issue is that a lawyer who should know better, says it lacks any evidence. That simply is not true
And his testimony is also considered evidence. Cancel each other out, now what? How about the witnesses she named that blatantly say it never happened? Is that evidence?
Again, anyone can make an accusation, seems if it's made about a repub, dems are hellbent to make it the truth without any sort of evidence other than some old hags unsubstantiated word. ::)
-
And his testimony is also considered evidence. Cancel each other out, now what? How about the witnesses she named that blatantly say it never happened? Is that evidence?
Again, anyone can make an accusation, seems if it's made about a repub, dems are hellbent to make it the truth without any sort of evidence other than some old hags unsubstantiated word. ::)
Ron forced me to touch Valentino's arm during an Arnold Classic. I remember it was at a party sometime in the 2000s. It was dark, there was loud music, it was cold outside, there were a lot of big men there and a lot of fake boobs. I felt violated. Getbig should be shut down ::)
-
Ron forced me to touch Valentino's arm during an Arnold Classic. I remember it was at a party sometime in the 2000s. It was dark, there was loud music, it was cold outside, there were a lot of big men there and a lot of fake boobs. I felt violated. Getbig should be shut down ::)
Did he put his hand over your mouth and try to take your clothes off
-
“The full details of Dr. Ford’s polygraph are particularly important because the Senate Judiciary Committee has received a sworn statement from a longtime boyfriend of Dr. Ford’s stating that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on polygraph examinations,” Grassley says in his request for the materials.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-sworn-statement-alleges-ford-lied-under-oath-about-prepping-someone-for-a-polygraph
This is looking more and more like a pro hit job from an alphabet agency.
-
Ron forced me to touch Valentino's arm during an Arnold Classic. I remember it was at a party sometime in the 2000s. It was dark, there was loud music, it was cold outside, there were a lot of big men there and a lot of fake boobs. I felt violated. Getbig should be shut down ::)
This is sad.. just sad.
-
Ron forced me to touch Valentino's arm during an Arnold Classic. I remember it was at a party sometime in the 2000s. It was dark, there was loud music, it was cold outside, there were a lot of big men there and a lot of fake boobs. I felt violated. Getbig should be shut down ::)
I bet Gregg loved it. I mean, what man wouldn't want their guns appraised by the Princess L, right?
;)
-
Accuser Julie Swetnick may face perjury charges says Harvard Law professors Alan Dershowitz:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/alan-dershowitz-if-julie-swetnick-lied-she-should-be-tried-for-perjury-and-sent-to-prison (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/alan-dershowitz-if-julie-swetnick-lied-she-should-be-tried-for-perjury-and-sent-to-prison)
-
The Left's entire smear campaign is crumbling daily:
In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.
The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor said she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford helping a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.
He also claimed Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a small, 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.
Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote. On Thursday, Ford testified, "I was hoping to avoid getting on an airplane. But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane." She also acknowledged regularly -- and, in her words, "unfortunately" -- traveling on planes for work and hobbies.
Ford also told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that she had a second front door installed in her home because of "anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms" that she purportedly suffered in the wake of Kavanaugh's alleged attack at a house party in the 1980s -- "more especially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing."
In a pointed, no-holds-barred letter Tuesday evening that referenced the ex-boyfriend's declaration, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley demanded that attorneys for Ford turn over her therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than truthful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday's dramatic Senate hearing.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm)
-
The Left's entire smear campaign is crumbling daily:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm)
Complete lunacy that many conservative commentators, etc. we're calling this woman credible (only that she had no evidence to back it up but still credible). Obvius lie from the beginning. They are/were just afraid to come out and say the truth due to fear of backlash or to be "civil" possibly and not upset "survivors". Lady is trash.
-
Complete lunacy that many conservative commentators, etc. we're calling this woman credible (only that she had no evidence to back it up but still credible). Obvius lie from the beginning. They are/were just afraid to come out and say the truth due to fear of backlash or to be "civil" possibly and not upset "survivors". Lady is trash.
"Credibility" is in the eye of the beholder, and mostly partisan.
But it's not about credibility - it's about evidence and corroboration, and there's nothing.
-
I guess they are anticipating the FBI will find nothing to help their case.
Lawyers for Kavanaugh accusers raise doubts over FBI probe
https://www.yahoo.com/news/lawyers-kavanaugh-accusers-worried-fbi-probe-not-serious-222447841.html
-
Accuser Julie Swetnick may face perjury charges says Harvard Law professors Alan Dershowitz:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/alan-dershowitz-if-julie-swetnick-lied-she-should-be-tried-for-perjury-and-sent-to-prison (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/alan-dershowitz-if-julie-swetnick-lied-she-should-be-tried-for-perjury-and-sent-to-prison)
What a vile human being. Note the date of the postings if she tries denying.
(https://i.postimg.cc/Pf8CLJSH/7hgiudfqdmo11.jpg)
-
Candace Owens Calls for Jailing of Christine Blasey Ford: ‘Lock Her Up’
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/Oc4do.2g2wbTDqaQ64ID7g--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9NjE4O2g9NDAw/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/homerun/thewrap.com/b35c99dada5dd21d678ae773824d8b3f)
Candace Owens attacked Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford on Wednesday, saying that she should be jailed.
Owens shared an article on Twitter from Fox News that reported that a former boyfriend of Dr. Ford said she helped prepare a friend for a polygraph test.
“WOW. LIAR Christine Ford’s entire testimony just got blown up by an ex-boyfriend of 6 years,” said Owens “She has HELPED people prep to take polygraph tests, never had a fear of flying–oh, and of course, never once mentioned her sexual assault.”
“#LockHerUp,” she added, throwing in the 2016 presidential campaign hashtag previously used almost exclusively by Trump supporters for Hillary Clinton.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/candace-owens-calls-jailing-christine-154728160.html
-
Meanwhile that creepy Down Syndrome-ridden, stammering piece of shit Susan Collins slammed the President again earlier today in front of the liberal press and implied she won't vote for his nominee. Typical two-faced white cum-guzzling nutjob.
-
Meanwhile that creepy Down Syndrome-ridden, stammering piece of shit Susan Collins slammed the President again earlier today in front of the liberal press and implied she won't vote for his nominee. Typical two-faced white cum-guzzling nutjob.
That’s got to be one ugly man in Drag Surely.
-
That’s got to be one ugly man in Drag Surely.
She's the American Theresa May.
-
She's the American Theresa May.
Ha ha She def is that.
In fact I think it’s got Theresa beat only Just though.
-
CBS Spends 3+ Minutes Asking Chelsea Clinton About Kavanaugh Allegations, Never Mentions Bill
(https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/bill-chelsea-clinton.jpg?w=628&h=353&crop=1)
CBS “This Morning” interviewed Chelsea Clinton about the allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, but failed to ask her about the multiple allegations against her father, former President Bill Clinton, on Wednesday.
Norah O’Donnell asked Chelsea Clinton what she thought about President Trump mocking Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee at a campaign event on Tuesday.
“I don’t think the president should be mocking anyone. I don’t think he should be mocking Dr. Ford. I don’t think he should be mocking a gold star family. I don’t think he should be mocking a disabled reporter,” Clinton said.
Gayle King followed up by asking Clinton what she thought about Kavanaugh’s testimony and his mention of the Clintons.
“Oh, my gosh, we loom so much larger in your mind than you loom, at least in mine,” Clinton said. “But to me what was so troubling was how nakedly partisan he was, and I think the principle of a judicial review being absent of partisanship is still really important.”
“I just don’t think that that is healthy as a dynamic on the Supreme Court or, really candidly, any court,” she added.
Clinton then said she doesn’t think that Kavanaugh, whose nomination she opposed from the beginning, should be confirmed to the Supreme Court.
In total, CBS “This Morning” spent more than three minutes discussing the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh, yet never once asked Clinton about the multiple women who have accused her father of sexual misconduct throughout the years.
https://ntknetwork.com/cbs-spends-3-minutes-asking-chelsea-clinton-about-kavanaugh-allegations-never-mentions-bill/
-
No mention of Keith Ellison's assault allegations by his ex girlfriend, nor of Al Franken's groping of several female colleagues. But yeah, the media's totally objective, fair and balanced.
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
-
No mention of Keith Ellison's assault allegations by his ex girlfriend, nor of Al Franken's groping of several female colleagues. But yeah, the media's totally objective, fair and balanced.
great point
I did a google search on Franken allegations and couldn't find a damn thing other than Fox, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBS, PBS, Newsweek, Vox, Washington Post, USA Today, CNN. Seems like the media just completely ignored it.
Franken denied most of the allegations which were things like putting his hand on a womans ass during a photo and and putting his hand on a womans waist during another photo shoot. Pretty serious stuff
Of course Franken stepped down and as you've pointed out, the media is so unfair in not reporting on that.
Kavanaugh should absolutely follow Frankens example and withdraw his nomination
-
CBS Spends 3+ Minutes Asking Chelsea Clinton About Kavanaugh Allegations, Never Mentions Bill
(https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/bill-chelsea-clinton.jpg?w=628&h=353&crop=1)
CBS “This Morning” interviewed Chelsea Clinton about the allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, but failed to ask her about the multiple allegations against her father, former President Bill Clinton, on Wednesday.
Norah O’Donnell asked Chelsea Clinton what she thought about President Trump mocking Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee at a campaign event on Tuesday.
“I don’t think the president should be mocking anyone. I don’t think he should be mocking Dr. Ford. I don’t think he should be mocking a gold star family. I don’t think he should be mocking a disabled reporter,” Clinton said.
Gayle King followed up by asking Clinton what she thought about Kavanaugh’s testimony and his mention of the Clintons.
“Oh, my gosh, we loom so much larger in your mind than you loom, at least in mine,” Clinton said. “But to me what was so troubling was how nakedly partisan he was, and I think the principle of a judicial review being absent of partisanship is still really important.”
“I just don’t think that that is healthy as a dynamic on the Supreme Court or, really candidly, any court,” she added.
Clinton then said she doesn’t think that Kavanaugh, whose nomination she opposed from the beginning, should be confirmed to the Supreme Court.
In total, CBS “This Morning” spent more than three minutes discussing the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh, yet never once asked Clinton about the multiple women who have accused her father of sexual misconduct throughout the years.
https://ntknetwork.com/cbs-spends-3-minutes-asking-chelsea-clinton-about-kavanaugh-allegations-never-mentions-bill/
They definitely should have asked her about her father being impeached by Republicans for lying about consensual relationship that had nothing to do with the investigation of a real estate deal in Arkansas.
With that premise they could have led into whether Kavanaugh should be impeached from his current job for repeatedly lying under oath to Congress.
Really seems like they missed an easy lay up by not asking that obvious question
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
Hopefully they ask him who put him up to this. :D
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
Good. I am surprised they are actually trying to hold someone accountable.
-
McCarthyism.
Kamala Harris Presents Letter Claiming Kavanaugh & Friend Repeatedly Raped ‘Jane Doe’ in Car
1 Oct 2018
The Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh last Wednesday regarding a letter delivered to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) in which an anonymous woman claims she was repeatedly raped by the judge without providing any details to investigate.
. . .
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/01/kamala-harris-presents-letter-claiming-kavanaugh-friend-repeatedly-raped-jane-doe-in-car/
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
I wonder if this is the same person on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, updated WIKI about the definition of Devil Triangle after Kavanaugh lied about it under oath last week.
-
McCarthyism.
Kamala Harris Presents Letter Claiming Kavanaugh & Friend Repeatedly Raped ‘Jane Doe’ in Car
1 Oct 2018
The Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh last Wednesday regarding a letter delivered to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) in which an anonymous woman claims she was repeatedly raped by the judge without providing any details to investigate.
. . .
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/01/kamala-harris-presents-letter-claiming-kavanaugh-friend-repeatedly-raped-jane-doe-in-car/
You mean Republican Senator Joe McCarthy?
-
Christine Blasey Ford's changing Kavanaugh assault story leaves her short on credibility
Margot Cleveland, Opinion contributor
Published Oct. 3, 2018
Put aside Christine Blasey Ford's emotional performance. Her testimony revealed her as a witness whose memories change at her convenience.
When Christine Blasey Ford testified last week before the Judiciary Committee, America witnessed a haunted woman recounting a devastating trauma. But putting aside Ford’s emotional performance and focusing instead on the professor’s testimony reveals numerous inconsistencies in her narrative that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.
As a sex-crimes prosecutor, Republican questioner Rachel Mitchell is well-positioned to “know it when she sees it.” But rather than see Ford as a victim of sexual abuse by Kavanaugh, Mitchell saw her as a witness lacking in credibility. And this conclusion comes from an expert who knows that there are many reasons victims delay reporting sexual abuse. Mitchell also recognized that victims may legitimately not remember certain details related to an attack.
But the problem for Ford is not that she doesn’t remember everything: It is that everything she remembers changes at her convenience.
First, Ford’s testimony that the assault occurred in the summer of 1982, when just 15, conflicted with both her therapist’s notes and the text message Ford sent to the Washington Post. According to reporter Emma Brown, Ford claimed she had been assaulted in the mid-1980s; and the therapist’s notes stated Ford had been the victim of an attempted rape in her late teens. But by that time, Kavanaugh was attending Yale, so Ford’s recasting of the attack to the summer of 1982 is suspect.
Ford's story changed in key ways
Ford’s retelling of the alleged sexual assault also included several conflicting accounts of the number of individuals at the gathering. The therapist’s notes stated that four boys had attempted to rape Ford. (Ford claims her therapist confused the total number of boys at the party with the number of boys who had attacked her.)
Later, in her July letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford again placed the number of individuals at the party at five, stating the gathering included her and four other individuals. But Ford then identified the four by name, and that group included three boys and one girl. And finally, during her Senate testimony, Ford unequivocally stated that “there were four boys I remember specifically being there,” in addition to her friend Leland Keyser.
Another significant change in the scenario came when Ford testified about the location of the party. She had originally told the Washington Post that the attack took place at a house not far from the country club. Yet, when Mitchell revealed a map of the relevant locations and reminded Ford that she had described the attack as having occurred near the country club, Ford backtracked: “I would describe [the house] as it's somewhere between my house and the country club in that vicinity that’s shown in your picture.” Ford added that the country club was a 20-minute drive from her home.
More: Don't count on FBI to clear up the Kavanaugh-Ford mess. Its record is flawed.
3 big questions hanging after Christine Blasey Ford's testimony on Brett Kavanaugh
How could both Kavanaugh and Ford seem to tell the truth? Trauma, alcohol and time.
Finally, Ford altered her description of the interior layout of the home and the details of the party and her escape. A “short” stairwell turned into a “narrow” one. The gathering moved from a small family room where the kids drank beer (and which Ford distinguished from the living room through which she fled the house) when she spoke to the Washington Post, to a home described in her actual testimony as having a "small living room/family room-type area.” And in an obvious tell to the change, Ford suggested that she could draw a floor plan of the house.
These four points are significant. First, because Ford had waited 30-plus years to report the purported attack, a therapist’s notes from Ford's sessions with her husband countered claims that Ford had invented the assault to derail Kavanaugh’s confirmation. But the notes did not name Ford’s attacker. And the timing of the assault summarized by her therapist, whom Ford saw individually the following year, conflicted with Ford’s current claims against Kavanaugh.
The final three contradictions are even more significant because in each circumstance Ford altered her story only after Kavanaugh and Senate investigators had obtained evidence to disprove her original tale. For instance, investigators had obtained statements from Kavanaugh and the two men and one female lifelong friend of Ford’s, and they all denied any recollection of the gathering.
These contradictions mean Ford's not credible
Investigators also spoke with former classmates of Kavanaugh, including two men who showed staffers the “party houses” near the country club during the relevant time period. And the detailed description of the home interior Ford originally provided allowed investigators to compare her story to the layout of the homes of the individuals Ford identified. But then Ford changed her description of the house’s floor plan.
Since media leaks of Ford’s charges first broke, Kavanaugh and his supporters have stressed the impossibility of proving the negative: Kavanaugh could not prove he did not attack Ford. But Kavanaugh could prove that Ford’s story could not possibly have happened by showing that none of the individuals at the supposed party lived in a house near the country club, and that none of their houses matched that described by Ford. Kavanaugh and investigators were poised to do so when Ford changed her story.
Open-minded Americans of all stripes should see that — emotions aside — Ford’s testimony is completely devoid of credibility: so much so, that Mitchell told the Senate this week that Ford’s allegations do not even meet the preponderance of evidence standard. That standard, which governs in civil litigation, asks whether it is more likely than not that an event occurred.
Yes, victims must be believed. But Ford is not a victim — at least not of Kavanaugh.
Margot Cleveland is a lawyer and an adjunct instructor at the University of Notre Dame. Follow her on Twitter: @ProfMJCleveland
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-changing-memories-not-credible-kavanaugh-column/1497661002/
-
Straw - Have they voted him in yet ?
If not when are they going to vote ?
-
Straw - Have they voted him in yet ?
If not when are they going to vote ?
McConnell says "test vote" on Friday
is that a thing?
Bart is probably over at Tobin's house
-
great point
I did a google search on Franken allegations and couldn't find a damn thing other than Fox, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBS, PBS, Newsweek, Vox, Washington Post, USA Today, CNN. Seems like the media just completely ignored it.
Franken denied most of the allegations which were things like putting his hand on a womans ass during a photo and and putting his hand on a womans waist during another photo shoot. Pretty serious stuff
Of course Franken stepped down and as you've pointed out, the media is so unfair in not reporting on that.
Kavanaugh should absolutely follow Frankens example and withdraw his nomination
Was anything about those two men asked of Chelsea in the interview? No. Referring to past articles from weeks/months ago is a straw man. Damn it, you snookered me again, you trickster.
I expect him to if the FBI substantiates the claims the accuser(s) have made against him. After all, it's an investigation the Democrats demanded before a floor vote. If it does not corroborate the claims made against him, then he should be voted on and the result of the vote should stand, positive or negative.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/cCwfsQxJ/Screenshot_2018-10-04_03.12.24.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/zXYnxP7H/Screenshot_2018-10-04_03.12.35.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/150D2c7C/Screenshot_2018-10-04_03.12.47.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/dVqGYkzq/Screenshot_2018-10-04_03.13.44.png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoozU0tU4AAvmgf.jpg:large)
-
Even mainstream news outlets aren't pulling punches with this psychopath as her story crumbles like a box of Mr Christie's cookies being shoveled in Schizzo's mouth.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-changing-memories-not-credible-kavanaugh-column/1497661002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-changing-memories-not-credible-kavanaugh-column/1497661002/)
-
Now the Left is melting since the report's completed, and their latest shock & awe gimmick is to claim the FBI doesn't know how to do its job since they didn't contact enough people to suit the liberals news networks' expectations. This is rich coming from the same network that hosted a primetime interview with discredited accuser Julie Swetnick, who even the FBI conceded couldn't be called on due to massive credibility gaps. These guys are truly shameless. This shit doesn't fly in the age of 24HR news and the Internet. As for attacking the very agency they had begged for an investigation from, it's a textbook case of them mashing the proverbial refresh screen button until the broken webpage they keep trying to connect to finally loads.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/dozens-potential-sources-information-have-not-been-contacted-fbi-kavanaugh-n916146 (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/dozens-potential-sources-information-have-not-been-contacted-fbi-kavanaugh-n916146)
-
The Left is pulling out the big guns and trotting out the same tired celebrity acts to try to keep its sinking ship from capsizing, now that Senate hearings and the FBI investigation they demanded have failed to bring the desired results.
Whoopi Goldberg, John Legend, Lena Dunham and other celebrities are joining forces to protest Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday.
Organizers say the main #CANCELKAVANAUGH Protest will be held outside the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol on Oct. 4 at 12:30 EDT.
In a final effort to stop Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation, the Women's March and other organizations have announced the Cancel Kavanaugh march, which will take place in Washington, D.C. on Oct. 4. Nationwide demonstrations are also scheduled for the next few days.
Some reports say the FBI's investigation into the sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh could wrap up sooner than the end of the week, which means the Senate might vote on his nomination by Friday. But don't panic because the fight is not over.
Liberal activists believe they have a shot at convincing Republican senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona, along with Democratic senators Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, to vote no on Kavanaugh's confirmation. Protestors and sexual assault survivors have confronted some of those senators to discuss their decisions, and Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, said Republicans "will not be intimidated by these people."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/10/02/john-legend-lena-dunham-other-celebs-set-protest-brett-kavanaugh/1505743002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/10/02/john-legend-lena-dunham-other-celebs-set-protest-brett-kavanaugh/1505743002/)
https://mashable.com/article/womens-march-cancel-kavanaugh/#_RAD6L82XPq4 (https://mashable.com/article/womens-march-cancel-kavanaugh/#_RAD6L82XPq4)
https://www.cancelkavanaugh.com/ (https://www.cancelkavanaugh.com/)
-
Buenas noches, bitches. 8)
(https://i.postimg.cc/NFnjqrFK/Trump_Evangelicals_1050x700.jpg)
-
Thanks for sharing.
The exits to the G&O are clearly marked. Feel free to show yourself out anytime.
-
Alas, the verbal food fight is more fun for the kids.
I'll stick to the issues and some thoughtful interaction.
Great. You can start by leaving this thread to the people who actually have something meaningful to contribute and go back to the G&O, which is where you do your best work on here. I'm asking as the author to do me a solid and not ruin it with your left-leaning rubbish. :)
-
That's exactly the response that I was expecting. No conservative poster seriously expects a liberal to act their age rather than their shoe size or compromise on anything. It's outside the scope of your maturity level and doesn't fit into the overall scheme of your narrow-minded posturing. Thanks for proving me right.
-
Great. You can start by leaving this thread to the people who actually have something meaningful to contribute and go back to the G&O, which is where you do your best work on here. I'm asking as the author to do me a solid and not ruin it with your left-leaning rubbish. :)
It's gotten too annoying (for me) to have meaningful political debate at this point.
That's life on any forum LOL. I leave the politics board with no hard feelings .
Thanks to all of you who tried to have some meaningful debate or posted funny stuff.
-
^
And I can't take anything the guy says seriously since his self-defeating, pseudo-populist, preachy 'racism' thread a couple of months ago. The sheer stupidity and ignorance of what he posted in that thread cost me a considerable number of brain cells I'll never get back. I suppose it was a matter of time before he'd waddle his worthless self into this forum and start corroding the decent threads with his leftist mumbo jumbo again.
-
Liberal crybabies already melting down :
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Feinstein: This Was an 'Incomplete Investigation'
townhall.com ^ | 10/4/2018 | Cortney O'Brien
Posted on 10/04/2018 9:22:29 AM PDT by rktman
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have been briefed on the FBI investigation into Judge Brett Kavanaugh and have come to very different conclusions than Chairman Chuck Grassley. The Republican senator said the findings confirm that Kavanaugh's record is clean. However, "The most notable part of the report is what’s not in it," according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). She sounded off with fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill Thursday after being briefed on the FBI report.
The FBI did not interview Kavanaugh or his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Feinstein noted. That's not fair and a judiciary committee hearing "should not be a substitute" for an FBI interview.
Senators "lack the expertise" of FBI agents, Feinstein said. Furthermore, they were only given five minutes to interview the nominee.
The FBI investigation itself was "very limited" in scope - and that appeared to be the White House's fault.
The White House "blocked access to millions of documents from Kavanaugh’s record, Feinstein charged, as well as 90 percent of his emails. While Democrats agreed that the investigation should be somehwat limited, they did not say that the White House "should tie the FBI’s hands."
"Our fears have been realized," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said after being briefed on the FBI report. "I disagree with Grassley that there was no hint of misconduct."
Schumer called for the documents, with proper redaction, be made public.
"Why shouldn't all of America see the facts?" he asked.
He too accused the White House of a cover up. The directive from White House Counsel Donald McGahn to the FBI shows the administration "greatly constrained the investigation from the get go."
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
-
Some undecided senators on Kavanaugh call FBI report 'reassuring' and 'thorough'
NBC "News" ^ | October 4, 2018 | by Rebecca Shabad and Frank Thorp
Posted on 10/4/2018, 1:00:10 PM by Oldeconomybuyer
Two key senators who have remained undecided on the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday praised a new FBI report detailing the agency's latest background investigation — comments that seemed to suggest the odds of confirmation might be moving in his direction.
Their comments came as Senate Republicans on Thursday claimed that the FBI probe into sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh had vindicated him by failing to uncover new evidence of wrongdoing, while Democrats blasted the speedy probe as "limited" and "incomplete."
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she was still absorbing the new report, but sounded satisfied with its scope, based on a GOP morning briefing. “It appears to be a very thorough investigation," she said, adding that she still planned to "go back to personally read the interviews.”
Retiring Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., another potential swing vote, left the same briefing saying he plans to go back and read more of the report, but said he saw “no additional corroborating information” to back up misconduct allegations, calling the report “reassuring.”
Democrats and attorneys for women who have accused Kavanaugh of misconduct have been critical of the depth of the investigation and of some of the limits the White House, which had initially dismissed the need for a new probe, had placed on it.
Top Democratic senators, meanwhile, expressed outrage Thursday that the FBI probe was limited in scope and incomplete.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
________________________ ________________________ __
ha ha ha ha!!!!!
-
This last-minute 7th investigation was a blessing in disguise for conservatives. You see, it exposed the left for its complete lack of honesty and integrity. They got everything they asked for and now they're still not satisfied, calling the FBI's scope and competence into question. It's like the patient who disagrees with his own doctor's diagnosis and wants to try five more hoping one will agree with their amateur opinion on what their problem is.
The American people get to see Chuck and Feinstein dissemble and obfuscate as they struggle to explain why the investigation they asked for failed to deliver the bombshell they were hoping for. Pretty weak stuff. A bunch of leftist women with no jobs and picket signs are protesting outside the Congress. America looks at them and laughs. A good man's name is being rebuilt by the hour and the fence-sitting Republicans are back in the saddle.
Trump = winning.
-
This last-minute 7th investigation was a blessing in disguise for conservatives. You see, it exposed the left for its complete lack of honesty and integrity. They got everything they asked for and now they're still not satisfied, calling the FBI's scope and competence into question. It's like the patient who disagrees with his own doctor's diagnosis and wants to try five more hoping one will agree with their amateur opinion on what their problem is.
The American people get to see Chuck and Feinstein dissemble and obfuscate as they struggle to explain why the investigation they asked for failed to deliver the bombshell they were hoping for. Pretty weak stuff. A bunch of leftist women with no jobs and picket signs are protesting outside the Congress. America looks at them and laughs. A good man's name is being rebuilt by the hour and the fence-sitting Republicans are back in the saddle.
Trump = winning.
Going out into the streets and kicking and screaming like a baby then heading back to your shitty job or your parent's home. What a great life.
-
Liberal crybabies already melting down :
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Feinstein: This Was an 'Incomplete Investigation'
townhall.com ^ | 10/4/2018 | Cortney O'Brien
Posted on 10/04/2018 9:22:29 AM PDT by rktman
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have been briefed on the FBI investigation into Judge Brett Kavanaugh and have come to very different conclusions than Chairman Chuck Grassley. The Republican senator said the findings confirm that Kavanaugh's record is clean. However, "The most notable part of the report is what’s not in it," according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). She sounded off with fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill Thursday after being briefed on the FBI report.
The FBI did not interview Kavanaugh or his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Feinstein noted. That's not fair and a judiciary committee hearing "should not be a substitute" for an FBI interview.
Senators "lack the expertise" of FBI agents, Feinstein said. Furthermore, they were only given five minutes to interview the nominee.
The FBI investigation itself was "very limited" in scope - and that appeared to be the White House's fault.
The White House "blocked access to millions of documents from Kavanaugh’s record, Feinstein charged, as well as 90 percent of his emails. While Democrats agreed that the investigation should be somehwat limited, they did not say that the White House "should tie the FBI’s hands."
There is a single copy of the FBI's findings and supposedly the report is over 1,000 pages long. There are 109 people who have clearance to access what was delivered to Capitol Hill at 2:30 Thursday morning -- 100 senators, four majority committee staffers and four minority committee staffers, one committee clerk. It is currently in a vault, in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. It cannot leave the room. Senators can't bring their phones into the SCIF when they go to review the documents. If they take notes, the notes must be left in the room when the senator leaves. Senators are not allowed to discuss or characterize in detail what they've read (though they most certainly will try.)
Feinstein must be upset that she can't leak the report.
-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/key-republicans-signal-satisfaction-with-fbi-report-increasing-confirmation-odds-for-kavanaugh/ar-BBNUZsy?ocid=spartanntp
The investigation was full , fair and complete. The dems got the extra FBI investigation, etc.
To me , their were sufficient POLITICAL reasons to vote NO on Kavanaugh.
The republicans had enough balls to admit they supported his views on abortion, etc
Sadly, the dems lacked the political courage to vote NO based purely on POLITICS.
I'd vote NO, and would have the courage to stand behind my politics.
In simple terms, just say what you believe and VOTE that way.
Then have the balls to stand behind your politics.
In summary, I don't agree with the republican political view ( on this), but they stand behind their political beliefs.
The GOP behind Trump appear to have the senate votes and support to win this one.
I'm sorry to say that you're more mature and level-headed than the people who claim to represent you in the House and Senate. On this issue, anyway.
The republicans bent over backwards to accomodate the Left. The fact is no investigation was required. It was offered as an olive branch to the undecided moderates in the GOP who weren't sold based on testimony alone and come from states with liberal populations that pressured them to stall until the process was complete.
As for the Democrats, they decided not to vote the day Kavanaugh was nominated months ago. That's partisanship. Lindsey Graham voted for Sotomayor and Kagan, because he felt that was the right thing to do despite disagreeing with their left-wing views. The Dems have chosen to vote as a bloc and allow no dissent or votes outside party lines. Too bad. It'll hurt them next month. The American people don't want that kind of Congress.
-
KAVANAUGH IN STRIKING DISTANCE AS COLLINS, FLAKE PRAISE THOROUGHNESS OF FBI REPORT
Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Jeff Flake of Arizona appeared pleased with the FBI’s supplemental background investigation of sexual misconduct allegations levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, placing Kavanaugh in a stronger position for confirmation as compared to recent days.
Though neither lawmaker has committed to supporting Kavanaugh, they did not seem troubled with the scope of the inquiry or disturbed by its contents, while Democrats were unmoved in their opposition to the judge’s confirmation. Flake, Collins and GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska hold the decisive votes on the Kavanaugh nomination.
“It appears to be a very thorough investigation but I’m going back later to personally read the interviews,” Collins said.
Flake went somewhat further than Collins, and discussed the investigation’s findings in general terms.
“We’ve seen no additional corroborating information,” Flake told reporters.
A single copy of the report was delivered to the Senate in the small hours on Thursday. Lawmakers and a handful of senior aides are reviewing it in a secure room inside the Capitol called a SCIF.
Terms for Senate review of FBI background checks on judicial nominees was set by a 2009 “memo of understanding” between the Judiciary Committee and the White House. Per this memo, the report may not be photocopied, and must be returned to FBI custody within five days of final action on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Notes and memos deriving from the report must be destroyed in a timely manner. (RELATED: Kavanaugh Fight Leaves Supreme Court Shorthanded For New Term)
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, spoke in somewhat different registers about the report in a joint appearance Thursday. Feinstein did not speak to the substance of the investigation, instead decrying its unspecified omissions.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/04/flake-collins-fbi-report-kavanaugh/
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoozU0tU4AAvmgf.jpg:large)
QFT!!
-
They had 6 prior FBI reports so this was just a touch up to weed out the new liars.
-
How many times has this poster promised to leave??
-
There is a single copy of the FBI's findings and supposedly the report is over 1,000 pages long. There are 109 people who have clearance to access what was delivered to Capitol Hill at 2:30 Thursday morning -- 100 senators, four majority committee staffers and four minority committee staffers, one committee clerk. It is currently in a vault, in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. It cannot leave the room. Senators can't bring their phones into the SCIF when they go to review the documents. If they take notes, the notes must be left in the room when the senator leaves. Senators are not allowed to discuss or characterize in detail what they've read (though they most certainly will try.)
Feinstein must be upset that she can't leak the report.
You mean like Spartacus saying the FBI report "hints of misconduct"?
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoozU0tU4AAvmgf.jpg:large)
Right?
-
Right?
wrong
-
wrong
Glad we cleared that up. ::)
-
That's what I'm here for
-
You mean people still don't realize Agnostic's been trolling this forum for the past year? He's even more far right than me. This whole thing has been an elaborate troll to rile up the conservative posters and until I got a PM about it the other day, I fell for it, too. Mostly though it was done to irritate coach and occasionally chaos.
That's why you don't see me fulminating at him with clenched fists anymore. He's one of us. 8)
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
Accused doxxer of GOP senators allegedly threatened to publish their children’s health information
Sources familiar with the case tell Fox News Cosko was in Sen. Hassan's office, where he was caught using a login he was not authorized to use. Cosko earlier was let go by Senator Hassan's office. A spokesman for Hassan says she "strongly denounces the alleged actions.”
According to Bell's statement, Cosko is alleged to have been confronted by the staffer and then walked out. Hours later the witness received an email from "livefreeorpwn@gmail.com" saying: “If you tell anyone I will leak it all. Emails signal conversations gmails. Senators children’s health information and socials.”
“Socials” apparently referred to social security numbers, while Signal is a secure messaging application. Bell said that there was probably cause to believe that Cosko published the information of senators, and then made threatening statements directed to the unnamed witness “with the intent to hinder, delay, or prevent” the witness from reporting it to authorities.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/accused-doxxer-of-gop-senators-allegedly-threatened-to-publish-their-childrens-health-information
-
What did Sheila Jackson Lee know and when did she know it?
-
Serious question:
After Kavanaugh is confirmed and the mid-terms, could the FBI launch a secret (or not) investigation on Ford, Feinstein, etc. for obstruction?
-
Accused doxxer of GOP senators allegedly threatened to publish their children’s health information
Sources familiar with the case tell Fox News Cosko was in Sen. Hassan's office, where he was caught using a login he was not authorized to use. Cosko earlier was let go by Senator Hassan's office. A spokesman for Hassan says she "strongly denounces the alleged actions.”
According to Bell's statement, Cosko is alleged to have been confronted by the staffer and then walked out. Hours later the witness received an email from "livefreeorpwn@gmail.com" saying: “If you tell anyone I will leak it all. Emails signal conversations gmails. Senators children’s health information and socials.”
“Socials” apparently referred to social security numbers, while Signal is a secure messaging application. Bell said that there was probably cause to believe that Cosko published the information of senators, and then made threatening statements directed to the unnamed witness “with the intent to hinder, delay, or prevent” the witness from reporting it to authorities.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/accused-doxxer-of-gop-senators-allegedly-threatened-to-publish-their-childrens-health-information
There's no limit to the perfidy of Progressives.
-
Serious question:
After Kavanaugh is confirmed and the mid-terms, could the FBI launch a secret (or not) investigation on Ford, Feinstein, etc. for obstruction?
Would love to see the FBI announce that a couple of weeks before the election.
-
Serious question:
After Kavanaugh is confirmed and the mid-terms, could the FBI launch a secret (or not) investigation on Ford, Feinstein, etc. for obstruction?
Yes. Trump could order it. I doubt it happens though. No way would they prosecute Ford for perjury. She is already a darling of the left. She's the next Anita Hill. We'll be seeing her on the lecture/talk show circuit for the next 20 years.
-
Yes. Trump could order it. I doubt it happens though. No way would they prosecute Ford for perjury. She is already a darling of the left. She's the next Anita Hill. We'll be seeing her on the lecture/talk show circuit for the next 20 years.
(https://godneighbor.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/paris_tuileries_garden_facepalm_statue.jpg?w=480)
-
You mean people still don't realize Agnostic's been trolling this forum for the past year? He's even more far right than me. This whole thing has been an elaborate troll to rile up the conservative posters and until I got a PM about it the other day, I fell for it, too. Mostly though it was done to irritate coach and occasionally chaos.
That's why you don't see me fulminating at him with clenched fists anymore. He's one of us. 8)
At 10 am tomorrow there will be a knock at your door. Answer it. To not answer it is futile. I assume you have your will in order, It will be painless. If you run.. and I know you are too smart for that, It will only lead to shall I say.. to casualties you would not want involved.
-
You mean people still don't realize Agnostic's been trolling this forum for the past year? He's even more far right than me. This whole thing has been an elaborate troll to rile up the conservative posters and until I got a PM about it the other day, I fell for it, too. Mostly though it was done to irritate coach and occasionally chaos.
That's why you don't see me fulminating at him with clenched fists anymore. He's one of us. 8)
Are you trying to say he's not 240? ;D
-
Yes. Trump could order it. I doubt it happens though. No way would they prosecute Ford for perjury. She is already a darling of the left. She's the next Anita Hill. We'll be seeing her on the lecture/talk show circuit for the next 20 years.
Plus, she wasn't lying. That they couldn't prove she was telling the truth doesn't mean she was lying
-
Plus, she wasn't lying. That they couldn't prove she was telling the truth doesn't mean she was lying
LOL guess you know more than the FBI now.
-
LOL guess you know more than the FBI now.
I apparently know more than you if you thought the FBI was going to determine whether she was telling the truth or not.
-
Plus, she wasn't lying. That they couldn't prove she was telling the truth doesn't mean she was lying
Agnostic- Really !! Come on now.
That’s just being obtuse & playing at semantics
Isn’t the onus on her to prove / verify her accusations ?
Kavanaugh’s Totally Innocent until Proven Guilty - or are you going to despute that Premise also.
Give it up She’s a very poor witness - you know it & she most definitely does or she would of
Pursued a criminal case against him.
-
1st, I'll agree with loco that it was silly of me to make some a announcement post about leaving the forum.
If I didn't want to interact on this forum, I can simply avoid coming to this site. No need to post some dopey goodbye reason.
Obviously, many on here don't agree with views. That's to be expected on any open politics forum.
I'll still post and even respond a bit.
Some of this is interesting and entertaining but it gets settled at the voting booth each election. ;)
Howard's back? 3rd time this year! fantastic! I'll start posting more.
-
"Senate Republicans said on Thursday that the FBI had sufficiently investigated allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and turned up no corroboration of the claims made by two of his accusers, Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez.
Democrats were quick to push back on that characterization of the highly anticipated report, arguing that the probe was deliberately limited by the White House and suggesting, without elaborating, that there were problematic details yet to be made public about Kavanaugh’s past."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/3b36f6d0-6beb-32a8-9b46-383f2376a095/kavanaugh%E2%80%99s-chances-improve.html
Democrats bitch about not getting their FBI investigation, then bitch about the FBI investigation after they finally get it. I hope they all lose in November. Evil f00k3r$ deserve that and worse.
-
I apparently know more than you if you thought the FBI was going to determine whether she was telling the truth or not.
Ok, heres your opportunity to explain what the FBI was investigating in your opinion. :)
-
1st, I'll agree with loco that it was silly of me to make some a announcement post about leaving the forum.
If I didn't want to interact on this forum, I can simply avoid coming to this site. No need to post some dopey goodbye reason.
Obviously, many on here don't agree with views. That's to be expected on any open politics forum.
I'll still post and even respond a bit.
Some of this is interesting and entertaining but it gets settled at the voting booth each election. ;)
We've crossed swords a good few times & I've also been supportive / encouraged you on certain things.
Please
Either stay and post or leave & delete your account your not doing yourself any favours
with the repetitive I'm leaving / good bye Malarkey.
-
We've crossed swords a good few times & I've also been supportive / encouraged you on certain things.
Please
Either stay and post or leave & delete your account your not doing yourself any favours
with the repetitive I'm leaving / good bye Malarkey.
More than fair I must say.
-
Manchin votes ‘yes’ on advancing Kavanaugh confirmation vote
(https://s3.amazonaws.com/wvmetro-uploads-prod/2018/07/Manchin-Kavanaugh-650x350.jpg)
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia voted “yes” during a procedural vote Friday morning on the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Manchin was the only Democrat to break partisan ranks. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voted “no” and was the only GOP member to dissent in a 51-49 vote that ended debate.
A final vote on Kavanaugh is expected Saturday.
Manchin remained vague about his stance until minutes before the cloture vote, saying as late as Friday morning that he probably wouldn’t make up his mind until he entered the Senate Chamber.
In the MetroNews Dominion Post West Virginia Poll released last month, 62 percent of likely voters in the Mountain State said they wanted Manchin to vote in favor of confirming Kavanaugh. Thirty-eight percent say no, that Manchin should not vote in favor of Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
Manchin is in a heated race against Republican challenger Patrick Morrisey, who contends the incumbent was “gutless” for making a last-minute political calculation instead of a resolute stand on Kavanaugh.
In a Tweet after the vote for cloture, Morrisey stated:
“Cowardice. Manchin literally waited until the outcome of the Kavanaugh procedural vote was decided before he piled on to join the winning side. We don’t need a gutless Senator from WV. Who in the media will call him out for being a modern day Hamlet?”
In late July, Manchin was the first Democrat to meet with Kavanaugh, calling the two-hour meeting “very productive” bu taking no public position.
In early July, Manchin said he would give the nomination significant consideration.
“As the Senator from West Virginia, I have a constitutional obligation to advise and consent on a nominee to fill Supreme Court vacancies and I take that responsibility seriously,” Manchin stated then.
“Just as I did when Merrick Garland and Neil Gorsuch were nominated, I will evaluate Judge Kavanaugh’s record, legal qualifications, judicial philosophy and particularly, his views on healthcare.”
In a poll released last week by the Judicial Crisis Network, which has spent millions of dollars in West Virginia in support of Kavanaugh’s nomination, said a vote by Manchin in favor of Kavanaugh by Manchin would cause 33 percent of Democrats to be more likely to vote for Manchin in his race against state Attorney General Patrick Morrisey while 23 percent would be less like. Forty-three percent of Democrats surveyed said it wouldn’t make a difference.
In that same poll, 43 percent of Republicans said they would be more likely to vote for Manchin if he’s a “yes” vote on Kavanaugh. A similar 43 percent of Republicans said it would make no difference.
http://wvmetronews.com/2018/10/05/manchin-votes-yes-on-kavanaugh-procedural-vote/
-
Black and Hispanic liberals are closet homophones, and white liberals are closet racists.
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/kI.WFJ1FLi1RhpzZHvigKQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/51973a40c926d0dca36e35731a58bce2)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/hCYxR1VH.7rEODpltBR0JQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/f7f474992b250f1428fb48a53a1404e8)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/O45FySDmFm3AHBe.ZJNCeQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/7a97c0ebe8ce370ce7fc7ab7d526fe3d)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/l86v.hYTP2AjAE8LNyPHBA--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/60d3570f80ba662448088edd3039aae7)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/XMKNhqnKvmWdeRtoUqpEfQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/39f5742f9b04b05db72ea8a6434cbd9f)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/7jslAc2kitPYFPPZoGiiiw--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/0a17db8f482d0fc4d6220a540432ed83)
-
Black and Hispanic liberals are closet homophones, and white liberals are closet racists.
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/kI.WFJ1FLi1RhpzZHvigKQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/51973a40c926d0dca36e35731a58bce2)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/hCYxR1VH.7rEODpltBR0JQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/f7f474992b250f1428fb48a53a1404e8)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/O45FySDmFm3AHBe.ZJNCeQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/7a97c0ebe8ce370ce7fc7ab7d526fe3d)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/l86v.hYTP2AjAE8LNyPHBA--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/60d3570f80ba662448088edd3039aae7)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/XMKNhqnKvmWdeRtoUqpEfQ--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/39f5742f9b04b05db72ea8a6434cbd9f)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/7jslAc2kitPYFPPZoGiiiw--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9MTI4MDtoPTk2MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/0a17db8f482d0fc4d6220a540432ed83)
Doesn't Bette Midler live in an ocean front 20 million dollar mansion?? ???
-
Looks like Flake is a yes.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/05/flake-reveals-vote-kavanaugh/
-
Plus, she wasn't lying. That they couldn't prove she was telling the truth doesn't mean she was lying
Yes she was lying. That’s what the evidence shows.
-
Doesn't Bette Midler live in an ocean front 20 million dollar mansion?? ???
I thought she lives in Manhattan
-
That piece of liberal Dem-voting shit Murkowski voted against it but Manchin is in, so that's alright. We're solid, boys. Let's put this one away and get Brett on that court. 8)
-
I thought she lives in Manhattan
Most New York celebrities have LA homes too, and sometimes a few townhouses in London and some in Paris, too. Limousine liberals sure love their excessive real estate holdings, and none of them house any black people or beaten women in their spare rooms.
-
2 weeks and this thread's as big as the Tennessee Bible thread that took almost 5 years to get to that size. I deliver. ;)
-
Flake to vote yes on Kavanaugh 'unless something big changed'
(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/09/28/img_0098_wide-83271a02ad0ca5494893b30a65cd1939ab289b7f-s800-c85.jpg)
Washington (CNN) Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, a key Republican swing vote, said Friday he plans to vote in favor of Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court.
"Unless something big changed, I don't see what would, but anyway I'm glad we had a better process," Flake told reporters. Earlier Friday, he voted to advance Kavanaugh's nomination to a final vote.
Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, previously called for an FBI investigation into accusations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh after both he and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both in high school, which he denies.
Republicans currently hold a 51-49 majority in the Senate, with Vice President Mike Pence a potential tie-breaking vote.
Fellow Republican senator and swing vote Lisa Murkowski voted to oppose Kavanaugh's advancement. When asked about Murkowski's vote, Flake said he admired her.
"I admire her a lot and everybody had to make their own decision," Flake said. "I think the world of her."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/10/05/politics/jeff-flake-brett-kavanaugh-vote-yes/index.html
-
Flake to vote yes on Kavanaugh 'unless something big changed'
(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/09/28/img_0098_wide-83271a02ad0ca5494893b30a65cd1939ab289b7f-s800-c85.jpg)
Washington (CNN) Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, a key Republican swing vote, said Friday he plans to vote in favor of Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court.
"Unless something big changed, I don't see what would, but anyway I'm glad we had a better process," Flake told reporters. Earlier Friday, he voted to advance Kavanaugh's nomination to a final vote.
Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, previously called for an FBI investigation into accusations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh after both he and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both in high school, which he denies.
Republicans currently hold a 51-49 majority in the Senate, with Vice President Mike Pence a potential tie-breaking vote.
Fellow Republican senator and swing vote Lisa Murkowski voted to oppose Kavanaugh's advancement. When asked about Murkowski's vote, Flake said he admired her.
"I admire her a lot and everybody had to make their own decision," Flake said. "I think the world of her."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/10/05/politics/jeff-flake-brett-kavanaugh-vote-yes/index.html
It’s almost like he’s inviting someone to make another allegation.
-
Collins and Manchin are yes votes. Great speech by Collins.
-
Sen. Susan Collins indicates she will vote yes on the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, making it incredibly likely he'll secure a spot on the court
(https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2018/09/susan-collins-kavanaugh-1536075907-e1536075958817.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&q=90&fit=crop&w=1440&h=720)
Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine indicated that she plans to vote yes on Saturday's final floor vote on the confirmation of embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, after she voted yes to invoking cloture on his nomination Friday morning.
She said the sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh fail to meet the "more-likely-than-not" threshhold and that they should not "fairly prevent Judge Kavanaugh from serving on the court."
With Collins a likely yes, Kavanaugh's confirmation is now all but certain. If the one remaining undecided senator, Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia, votes yes, Kavanaugh will be confirmed 51-49.
Even if Manchin votes no and the Senate comes down 50-50 on Kavanaugh, Vice President Mike Pence could cast the tie-breaking vote to confirm him, which would be the first time in history the vice president cast a tie-breaking vote on the confirmation of a federal judge.
As a moderate Republican who supports abortion rights, not only has Collins's vote has been heavily scrutinized for months, but she is also the subject of a historically unprecedented fundraising campaign from Maine activists that will automatically trigger over $1.9 million in donor pledges to fund her future opponent when she goes up for re-election in 2020 if she votes yes on Kavanaugh.
While Collins and Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell decried the campaign as a form of bribery, law professors Deborah Hellman and Stuart Green wrote in The Atlantic that the campaign does not fit the legal parameters of a bribe because they are threatening to give the funds to her eventual, unnamed opponent instead of offering her money to vote a certain way.
Kavanaugh, a federal judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, is embroiled in scandal relating to sexual assault allegations dating back to the early 1980s, which he has vehemently denied both under oath and to the press.
His confirmation was delayed in order for him and accuser Christine Blasey Ford to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and for the FBI to conduct a supplemental background investigation into the allegations, which was completed on Wednesday.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/susan-collins-will-vote-yes-on-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-2018-10
-
Democrats in sheer meltdown in my FB feed
-
Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin says he will vote for Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh
In a statement, Manchin (D-W.V.) said, "I believe he will rule in a manner that is consistent with our Constitution.”
The confirmation vote, scheduled for Saturday, needs support from at least 50 senators. Vice President Pence would cast the tiebreaking vote if necessary.
-
Serious question:
After Kavanaugh is confirmed and the mid-terms, could the FBI launch a secret (or not) investigation on Ford, Feinstein, etc. for obstruction?
I doubt it. Just as there was insufficient proof that Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, there are only opinions and not proof of Ford or Feinstein attempting to obstruct Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court.
-
I doubt it. Just as there was insufficient proof that Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, there are only opinions and not proof of Ford or Feinstein attempting to obstruct Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court.
How about that, Prime?
Would you date a younger hottie like Professor Ford?
-
Most New York celebrities have LA homes too, and sometimes a few townhouses in London and some in Paris, too. Limousine liberals sure love their excessive real estate holdings, and none of them house any black people or beaten women in their spare rooms.
Ha - Exactly Right
How very true
Let’s see them in action & housing some.
-
How about that, Prime?
Would you date a younger hottie like Professor Ford?
prime likes em young
and by young I mean absent of pubic hair
and by pubic hair I mean vaginal openings
-
Leftist Nazis trying to guilt Joe Manchin into voting against Kavanaugh
White self-hating #MeToo unemployed liberal women melting
Lindsey Graham shuts down protester
Liberals going volcanic outside
-
At the end of the day Kavanaugh is an establishment judge and a former(always will be) Bushie. He's not going to overturn R v. W but he may be more corporatist and pro big govt search and seizure than very conservative parts of the right would like.
I think dems will find that the negative impact at the polls was not worth fighting this fairly predictable pick the way they did.
-
the sky is falling Cassandras will be proven wrong, as usual
few months from now when he doesn't overturn abortion or pardon Trump preemptively for anything he might do in office (something only Ford did, for Nixon), they'll find some new obsession to bitch about
healthcare or something, since they already melted over illegals at the border and the 2016 election thing is getting old
the left always needs something to rally against, it's all they do for a living since they never actually produce or propose anything
-
I thought she lives in Manhattan
She does. she lives in an apartment in a building in Manhattan on 5th Ave. This is the view from her terrace.
(https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/07/article-2622526-1DA53C0800000578-950_634x819.jpg)
Not bad for a gal whose career began when she was singing at the Continental Baths, a gay bathhouse in the Ansonia Hotel, in the summer of 1970.
-
Yes she was lying. That’s what the evidence shows.
No, you are wrong again. But it is what it is. They had their hearing, he got enough votes or so it seems. Done deal. In the future I would propose that when a sitting President nominates a SCJ, if the senate majority is of the same party of the President, that they forgo a hearing and vote. It's a waste of time.
-
I love the smell of liberal tears. It smells like... victory. 8) :-*
(http://i68.tinypic.com/xcvq7p.jpg)
-
No, you are wrong again. But it is what it is. They had their hearing, he got enough votes or so it seems. Done deal. In the future I would propose that when a sitting President nominates a SCJ, if the senate majority is of the same party of the President, that they forgo a hearing and vote. It's a waste of time.
If any Republican tried to pass a law like that, the Left would collectively declare jihad on American society. You're acting as if any kind of reasonable debate or compromise is possible with a party whose shining beacons are celebrity singers and actors, and who declared half the population deplorable idiots 2 years ago for not voting for them. Oh, and not one of them has condemned these angry, criminal mobs that are flooding the capitol and harassing politicians off and on the clock. They're complicit in that bullshit and that's why nobody cares what the Democrats have to say. The media's corrupt. It's all farce.
-
Libs in the Congress failed to derail the Kavanaugh nomination through conventional means and scrutiny of his legal record, and he passed every FBI background check, so now they've bet their entire desperate battle on the tried-and-tested method of pulling some obscure woman out of the garbage heap, dusting her off, and begging her for ANYTHING that could save their pathetic last-minute attempts to block a conservative from the court. I predict this will not only fail but blow up so hard in their faces that it'll knock down the rotten MeToo 'movement' whose shaky scaffolding can't survive a firm and hard rejection by the American people with a conscience and a brain in their heads.
I was right on the money. 8)
-
48-50 confirmed.
Chalk another one for Trump.
/thread
-
BOOOOM. Confirmed. 50-48 with one Dem abstaining.
-
BOOOOM. Confirmed. 50-48 with one Dem abstaining.
Technically she abstained because a Republican was at a wedding, and forfeited her vote to cancel his out since it wouldn't make a difference.
Liberals in full critical mass nuclear reactor meltdown outside. It's a beautiful sight to behold. The lowest scum of the earth just got shown the door.
-
Brett Kavanaugh confirmed by Senate in 50-48 vote, will ascend to Supreme Court
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/Judge_Brett_Kavanaugh.jpg/220px-Judge_Brett_Kavanaugh.jpg)
The Senate voted on Saturday to confirm Brett Kavanaugh as the newest member of the Supreme Court, voting largely along party lines to end an emotional weeks-long debate characterized by explosive allegations of sexual assault.
With one senator voting present, Kavanaugh officially ascended to the nation's highest court as an Associate Justice, following an unusually partisan process that united Republicans, but divided the population in an era defined by the public's reckoning with sexual assault.
Kavanaugh, 53, a federal appeals court judge who investigated President Bill Clinton and worked for his successor, President George W. Bush, is President Donald Trump's second high court nominee in two years, following Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was confirmed in 2017.
Kavanaugh's confirmation became all but assured on Friday, after a wavering group of senators made their preferences public in the wake of a supplemental Federal Bureau of Investigations probe. The week-long investigation revealed nothing new in the allegations against Kavanaugh, but was met with furious criticism by many Democrats.
"The White House applauds the Senate for confirming President Trump's nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Later today, the president will sign his commission of appointment and he will be officially sworn in," said Raj Shah, a White House spokesman.
Republicans and Democrats grappled for weeks over Kavanaugh's views on controversial legal rulings and the disclosure of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to the nominee. But in September, the judge's seemingly clear path toward a winning vote in the GOP-controlled Senate became obstructed by a decades old accusation of sexual assault, which mushroomed into multiple allegations that sparked weeks of agonizing debate.
California professor Christine Blasey Ford sent a letter to California Democrat Rep. Anna Eshoo alleging that, in the 1980s, an intoxicated Kavanaugh and his classmate, Mark Judge, had pinned her down on a bed, covered her mouth and attempted to take her clothes off. Ford, Kavanaugh and Judge were all in high school at the time.
For his part, Kavanaugh vehemently denied the allegations, which culminated in an emotionally pitched testimony on the same day Ford appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss the incident in question.
The soft-spoken accuser was widely viewed as credible and sympathetic, while the judge's fiery, combative performance inspired conservatives, including the president, to ramp up their support for him.
Beforehand, Democrats' chances of successfully stopping Kavanaugh's confirmation were broadly viewed as slim throughout the majority of the confirmation process. Kavanaugh's record and character were extolled by conservative judicial groups, as well as some prominent figures on the left, including self-described "liberal feminist lawyer" Lisa Blatt.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had set in motion the process to quickly confirm Kavanaugh after the hearing, but retiring Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., pushed for a week-long delay so the FBI could re-open its background investigation into the judge to specifically look into the allegations against him. The brief probe, which was limited in scope, wrapped up before the one-week deadline.
Tensions between Republicans desperate to confirm Kavanaugh before the November midterm elections, and Democrats determined to slow down the process, boiled over in Senate Judiciary Committee hearings earlier in September.
Democrats grilled Kavanaugh on topics including the constitutionality of abortion, the possibility of indicting a sitting president and the limits of a president's pardon power. Kavanaugh, often citing the precedent set by prior nominees' judicial hearings, generally declined to discuss his views.
The two parties appeared mostly unified in support or opposition of Kavanaugh. But with Republicans holding a razor-thin majority in the Senate, a handful of politically moderate or electorally vulnerable senators on either side of the aisle quickly gained the most attention.
Among them was Collins, a moderate Republican who had spoken positively of Kavanaugh and said he had told her that he considered the consequential 1973 Roe v. Wade case, which legalized abortion, as "settled law."
Three red-state Democratic senators — North Dakota's Heidi Heitkamp, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Manchin — who voted for Gorsuch in 2017 had also come under intense scrutiny from journalists and advocacy groups. Heitkamp and Donnelly announced their opposition to Kavanaugh. On the other hand, Manchin announced his support for the nominee quickly after Collins made her announcement.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/10/06/brett-kavanaugh-confirmed-by-senate-in-50-48-vote.html
-
Clarence Thomas is already planning a pubic hair on his beer can joke
-
(https://i.redd.it/kom8ptd38lq11.gif)
-
(https://i.redd.it/kom8ptd38lq11.gif)
(https://i.redd.it/9juyoov08wo11.gif)
-
(https://i.redd.it/kom8ptd38lq11.gif)
;D
-
No, you are wrong again. But it is what it is. They had their hearing, he got enough votes or so it seems. Done deal. In the future I would propose that when a sitting President nominates a SCJ, if the senate majority is of the same party of the President, that they forgo a hearing and vote. It's a waste of time.
How did her's & the Democraps Derailment Nonsense Workout ;D ;D ;D
-
How did her's & the Democraps Derailment Nonsense Workout ;D ;D ;D
You tell me.
(https://i.postimg.cc/9FkvCdQZ/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.47.43.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/LsKwZmfs/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.47.57.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/hjKYpM2W/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.48.06.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/G2z5NYfB/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.48.14.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/YS6V6Tfz/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.48.44.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/qqR5dqf1/Screenshot_2018-10-07_06.49.08.png)
-
(https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/trumps-2nd-term-supreme-court-nominations-ray-liotta-triggered-liberal.jpg?resize=515%2C415&ssl=1)
-
Just a daily reminder that you guys lost. :)
-
As I already posted that Trump and the republicans won a sweeping victory in 2016, leading
to this latest win for his SCOTUS pick. It's like a hard fought game.
If you put more points on the board, you get to declare victory.
It's silly and useless to cry or carry on about this.
I don't like Trump and many of his views.
So,for the first time I'm voting 100% democrat in the elections next month.
If the dems win the house 2018, and eventually the POTUS ( and senate) in 2020, they get to pass laws and pick judges* ( when it comes up).
This one went to team Trump , they won this SCOTUS pick, fair and sqaure with more GOP senators.
BUT after next election things might be different (* at least in the house of reps)?
Nice people you've got on your side, Howie.
You still sure this was about "Dr" Ford's testimony and not something else all along?
(https://i.postimg.cc/0QqXmHRq/Screenshot_2018-10-08_17.40.20.png)
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36827/colbert-writer-kavanaugh-im-just-glad-we-ruined-joseph-curl (https://www.dailywire.com/news/36827/colbert-writer-kavanaugh-im-just-glad-we-ruined-joseph-curl)
-
He's being sworn in live on Fox News right now.
-
As I already posted that Trump and the republicans won a sweeping victory in 2016, leading
to this latest win for his SCOTUS pick. It's like a hard fought game.
If you put more points on the board, you get to declare victory.
It's silly and useless to cry or carry on about this.
I don't like Trump and many of his views.
So,for the first time I'm voting 100% democrat in the elections next month.
If the dems win the house 2018, and eventually the POTUS ( and senate) in 2020, they get to pass laws and pick judges* ( when it comes up).
This one went to team Trump , they won this SCOTUS pick, fair and sqaure with more GOP senators.
BUT after next election things might be different (* at least in the house of reps)?
I'm voting 100% Republican just to counter your vote and make it null and void, like your life.
-
I'm voting 100% Republican just to counter your vote and make it null and void, like your life.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSZpS4oGDJnHmmUiDiyMpiqDdrpTBXYzO8Ch6xDItGcJ9tuZFEx)
-
LMFAO.
The Left went insane today, clawing and banging on the doors of the Supreme Court. Tbombz makes a special appearance at the beginning of the video. Straw Man in the blue t-shirt with glasses at the back too.
-
No, you are wrong again. But it is what it is. They had their hearing, he got enough votes or so it seems. Done deal. In the future I would propose that when a sitting President nominates a SCJ, if the senate majority is of the same party of the President, that they forgo a hearing and vote. It's a waste of time.
I am often wrong but hardly ever when having exchanges with you.
Yes the facts are what they are, as adeptly laid out by Rachel Mitchell. But nothing she says will convince true believers like you.
Your proposal is silly.
-
At the end of the day on Nov 6, we'll count the totals and see who wins.
(https://www.denverpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/donald-trump2.jpg?w=525)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DM7D_TuVAAA6ddr.jpg)
-
Millions will do like either of us.
At the end of the day on Nov 6, we'll count the totals and see who wins.
Pretty simple.
Seek help. How on earth do you dare post on this forum given what a complete ass you have made of yourself since the election in 2016? You lack any sense of shame whatsoever. Seek MOFO help for F sake.
-
Seek help. How on earth do you dare post on this forum given what a complete ass you have made of yourself since the election in 2016? You lack any sense of shame whatsoever. Seek MOFO help for F sake.
For some reason this dickless buttplug pisses me off way more than prime or straw. He's so smug and self-assured in his willful ignorance, and it's not even about politics. He married NINE TIMES. HE is the reason why women are such obnoxious whores anymore. He makes mockery of marriage. He's so fucking stupid that reading his posts is like punching yourself in the face repeatedly on purpose. And unlike those two other liberal nuthuggers, he's not even good for a laugh. He's just fucking annoying.
-
I've been married and divorced ( a couple times) and made no secret of it.
The 9 wives thing is just a get big joke I use. LOL, only a retard would take it serious.
Yes, I don't like Trump or the current direction of the republican party.
The political pendulum swings back and forth.
Like most before him, Trump and his party loyalists over-reached.
So, like most President's , he'll lose seats in congress during his 1st midterms.
It's likely the dems will gain seats in the house of reps in next months election.
I was polite and accepeted political reality when team Trump won big in 2016.
Many Trump supporters enjoyed making fun of upset, crying liberals.
I'll be curious to see how gracious the Trump supporters are if this election doesn't go their way.
We'll riot in the streets, block traffic, destroy buildings, attack demoncratic representatives, etc, etc. Just like you dummycrats have done
-
We'll riot in the streets, block traffic, destroy buildings, attack demoncratic representatives, etc, etc. Just like you dummycrats have done
I've got 3 rifles and two handguns that I can open carry. I'm looking forward to it.
-
The Odd Story About Christine Blasey Ford’s Second Front Door That Triggered The Kavanaugh Allegation
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/06/the-odd-story-about-christine-blasey-fords-second-front-door-that-triggered-the-n2525474
-
The Odd Story About Christine Blasey Ford’s Second Front Door That Triggered The Kavanaugh Allegation
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/06/the-odd-story-about-christine-blasey-fords-second-front-door-that-triggered-the-n2525474
Thanks for that link
A very interesting article
I’d like to see Ford have the courage to press charges against Kavanaugh
Or Have Charges Against her for lying & trying to wreck an innocent man’s
Life & his family’s & his career.
The Democraps & Their Supporters have Sunk to new depths
We can but hope decent minded people recognise this & turn away
From them by not voting for them.
-
This is the $3M house??
(https://turtleboysports.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Screen-Shot-2018-09-30-at-11.50.39-PM-807x536.png)
The City of Palo Alto Municipal Code requires trash bins to be enclosed and not visible from the street.
(https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/streetview?channel=rdc-ldp-streetview&client=gme-movesalesinc&location=3872+Duncan+Pl%2CPalo+Alto%2CCA%2C94306&size=640x480&signature=vlxCOqKStUR5rNAIX9GNAt4jwdg=)
-
This is the $3M house??
(https://turtleboysports.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Screen-Shot-2018-09-30-at-11.50.39-PM-807x536.png)
It must be a very expensive property area
That looks a bit like a mobile home type place.
I don’t know property prices over there - maybe that’s a desirable residence.
-
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
Kavanaugh's replacement on D.C. Circuit could get confirmed by Christmas, Grassley says
(http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/160406_POL_Chuck-Grassley.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg)
Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said Wednesday the Senate could confirm a replacement for Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s old seat on the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. by the end of the year.
The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is seen as the second highest court in the country, since many of the federal government’s legal challenges make their way through the docket.
“If we received it right now, the answer is yes, but just before Christmas. So it kind of depends upon how long we’ll be in session,” Mr. Grassley, Iowa Republican, told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt on Wednesday.
The White House has not yet sent over a nominee to the Judiciary Committee to replace the seat left vacant following Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
Sen. John Kennedy, Louisiana Republican, said he has a feeling the White House will be sending over a name soon.
Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat, laughed at the notion the GOP would push through a replacement for Justice Kavanaugh’s old seat so quickly.
“That is the first I have heard of it. That would strike me as an ambitious schedule,” he said.
Currently there are seven Democratic appointed active judges on the D.C. Circuit, while there are only three GOP appointed jurists. Just one, Judge Greg Katsas, was appointed by President Trump.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/10/chuck-grassley-kavanaughs-replacement-could-get-co/
-
It must be a very expensive property area
That looks a bit like a mobile home type place.
I don’t know property prices over there - maybe that’s a desirable residence.
?
(https://newsfeeds.media/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/protesters-back-christine-fords-claim-she-was-sexually-assaulted-by-brett-kavanaugh.jpg)
3872 Duncan Pl
Palo Alto, CA 94306
-
?
(https://newsfeeds.media/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/protesters-back-christine-fords-claim-she-was-sexually-assaulted-by-brett-kavanaugh.jpg)
3872 Duncan Pl
Palo Alto, CA 94306
4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...
-
4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...
This is why I love getbig. Lol.
-
4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...
lol - which one is 1?!!
-
Millions will do like either of us.
At the end of the day on Nov 6, we'll count the totals and see who wins.
Pretty simple.
Yes, but it's so much fun to spin our wheels in the meantime. ::)
-
For some reason this dickless buttplug pisses me off way more than prime or straw. He's so smug and self-assured in his willful ignorance, and it's not even about politics. He married NINE TIMES. HE is the reason why women are such obnoxious whores anymore. He makes mockery of marriage. He's so fucking stupid that reading his posts is like punching yourself in the face repeatedly on purpose. And unlike those two other liberal nuthuggers, he's not even good for a laugh. He's just fucking annoying.
We are the brave!
-
We'll riot in the streets, block traffic, destroy buildings, attack demoncratic representatives, etc, etc. Just like you dummycrats have done
Nothing new going on here.
-
It must be a very expensive property area
That looks a bit like a mobile home type place.
I don’t know property prices over there - maybe that’s a desirable residence.
Living in Palo Alto is not affordable. The median home value in Palo Alto is $3,270,200. Palo Alto home values have gone up 14.0% over the past year and Zillow predicts they will rise 9.3% within the next year. The median list price per square foot in Palo Alto is $1,510, which is higher than the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metro average of $690. The median income is $137,000.
-
Living in Palo Alto is not affordable. The median home value in Palo Alto is $3,270,200. Palo Alto home values have gone up 14.0% over the past year and Zillow predicts they will rise 9.3% within the next year. The median list price per square foot in Palo Alto is $1,510, which is higher than the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metro average of $690. The median income is $137,000.
137k buying a 3.3m home? I don't think so.
At any rate, why did she need two front doors? To rent one side of her house out to help pay her mortgage?
-
Thanks for that link
A very interesting article
I’d like to see Ford have the courage to press charges against Kavanaugh
Or Have Charges Against her for lying & trying to wreck an innocent man’s
Life & his family’s & his career.
The Democraps & Their Supporters have Sunk to new depths
We can but hope decent minded people recognise this & turn away
From them by not voting for them.
This undermines the whole premises
-
137k buying a 3.3m home? I don't think so.
At any rate, why did she need two front doors? To rent one side of her house out to help pay her mortgage?
Once again, a simple statistical reply gets misrepresented. It behooves you to read illuminatti's post before jumping in with your irrelevant response. Where did I ever suggest these figures applied to any particular situation? It was a simple answer to the question as to whether Palo Alto is an expensive place to live.
-
This undermines the whole premises
Why do you say that then ? Explain please
Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?
-
Tick Tock....
-
Why do you say that then ? Explain please
Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?
Lately, Agnostic no longer speaks in whole sentences or cogent, well-reasoned arguments. He's now reached Mao Zedong-level enlightenment, where a word, a nod of the head, a subtle hand gesture, and a deep rhetorical question keeps his mesmerized audience locked to him with rapt attention, trying to discern every movement and sign in order to decipher the meaning of his inscrutible responses.
Try to see it this way. We're Matt Damon and he's Robbie Coltrane in this scene:
-
Why do you say that then ? Explain please
Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?
A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.
-
A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.
The rules are not different. The golden rule and the one on which our country was founded was the presumption of innocence. It doesn't matter if it's a criminal court or a public hearing. You fucking morons on the left seem to have real problems understanding this.
-
A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.
Exactly - You don’t say there not the same ::) Really
She & The Democraps did the senate route
1, because the burden of proof upon her was no existent
2, to derail & stop him getting elected
Of Course she never had any intention of going with criminal charges
She would’ve opened herself up to all sorts of potential problems.
Piece of crap she is & her idiot supporters.
-
Why do you say that then ? Explain please
Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?
It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.
-
It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.
You know it as well as I do
It’s a load of Bollocks
She hadn’t a clue what she was on about
Let alone who it was.
I can only hope women from 38yrs ago don’t suddenly spring up accusing you
Of thing she says you did to her - Just to Let People Know... ::) ::) ::)
And how would you get out of that one then. You couldn’t as he couldn’t.
Try putting yourself in his position- You’d likely have a very different view & attitude.
-
You know it as well as I do
It’s a load of Bollocks
She hadn’t a clue what she was on about
Let alone who it was.
I can only hope women from 38yrs ago don’t suddenly spring up accusing you
Of thing she says you did to her - Just to Let People Know... ::) ::) ::)
And how would you get out of that one then. You couldn’t as he couldn’t.
Try putting yourself in his position- You’d likely have a very different view & attitude.
No, we disagree on this one. I don't agree with you and pretend I don't agree with you.
-
It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.
The only other eye witness also claims she wasn't there and can't remember anything about her friend's story. That didn't help, either.
Ford knew this was an unwinnable case. That was never the point. She wanted a ton of money and a plump book deal. Her boring, nothing-ever-happens existence as an obscure college professor has been traded for something a lot more fun and exciting.
-
No, we disagree on this one. I don't agree with you and pretend I don't agree with you.
If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?
-
If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?
We've been over this already over a month.
He claims it'll never happen because he never did anything wrong. But if it does, he'll call on an ex-colleague of his, a female detective with a lot of experience, who'll be his character reference. If that doesn't cut it, all his ex-coworkers will pitch in. And if that's not enough, his years as a sexual assault survivor team member will surely convince skeptics that he couldn't possibly be guilty, since cops who hunt predators are never predators themselves.
I got news for him. When they're ready for your white ass, even a 30 year career in law enforcement can't help you. A few accusations later, you're grimy and fit for an orange jumpsuit in the eyes of the community, whether true or not.
-
If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?
If it happened as she said it did I would apologize to her, letting her know that my behavior was unacceptable and I regret causing her obvious mental anguish and that I am not that person and haven't been for 3 decades.
If I didn't do it I would certainly have been vocal about getting the FBI involved to attempt to make sense of it.
-
If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?
My turn to ask a question. Did you believe his explanations for
Beach Week Ralph Club?
Renate Alumnus?
Bart O'Kavenaugh?
If you did then you may just be the most gullible person on the planet. If you didn't do you think someone who lied under oath should be disqualified from the Supreme Court?
-
If it happened as she said it did I would apologize to her, letting her know that my behavior was unacceptable and I regret causing her obvious mental anguish and that I am not that person and haven't been for 3 decades.
If I didn't do it I would certainly have been vocal about getting the FBI involved to attempt to make sense of it.
yeah apologizing worked well for those 90-odd famous men who got accused, too
real well
how's morgan freeman doing these days? he was an a-lister until 5 months ago
-
My turn to ask a question. Did you believe his explanations for
Beach Week Ralph Club?
Renate Alumnus?
Bart O'Kavenaugh?
If you did then you may just be the most gullible person on the planet. If you didn't do you think someone who lied under oath should be disqualified from the Supreme Court?
None of those things have anything to do with "dr" Ford's claims against him. So whether he told the truth about them or not is immaterial. Just like whether "Dr" ford lied to her husband about her number of sexual partners also doesn't matter because it's not material to the case.
-
None of those things have anything to do with "dr" Ford's claims against him. So whether he told the truth about them or not is immaterial. Just like whether "Dr" ford lied to her husband about her number of sexual partners also doesn't matter because it's not material to the case.
We'll have to disagree. Lying under oath is a biggie and should disqualify him from the position.
-
If it happened as she said it did I would apologize to her, letting her know that my behavior was unacceptable and I regret causing her obvious mental anguish and that I am not that person and haven't been for 3 decades.
If I didn't do it I would certainly have been vocal about getting the FBI involved to attempt to make sense of it.
If it happened as she said - you’d admit it & all would be good - She’d forgive you
And back your nomination & encourage all others to back you.
Please Get Real - You’d Be Facing a criminal court as you’d of admitted it.
So much for your wife /family / career.
He didn’t do it and
The FBI I believe did get involved.
And he was cleared & elected.
-
We'll have to disagree. Lying under oath is a biggie and should disqualify him from the position.
Well, it didn't, he's confirmed, so grow a fucking pair and get over it.
-
If it happened as she said - you’d admit it & all would be good - She’d forgive you
And back your nomination & encourage all others to back you.
Please Get Real - You’d Be Facing a criminal court as you’d of admitted it.
So much for your wife /family / career.
He didn’t do it and
The FBI I believe did get involved.
And he was cleared & elected.
Yes, if I did it and she came around 38 years later to accuse me, I would certainly admit it. I am vying for a seat on the Supreme court. I am a federal judge. I certainly believe I could survive telling the truth. Anyone can tell the truth when there is no cost. Integrity and character come into play when it will cost and you still do it.
-
Well, it didn't, he's confirmed, so grow a fucking pair and get over it.
Dude I am over it. We're just talking here...
-
Yes, if I did it and she came around 38 years later to accuse me, I would certainly admit it. I am vying for a seat on the Supreme court. I am a federal judge. I certainly believe I could survive telling the truth. Anyone can tell the truth when there is no cost. Integrity and character come into play when it will cost and you still do it.
Do you know anyone running for the Supreme Court or any other high office that got elected once they admitted to a charge they were accused of, assuming of similar gravity to hers?
I'll wait.
-
My turn to ask a question. Did you believe his explanations for
Beach Week Ralph Club?
Renate Alumnus?
Bart O'Kavenaugh?
If you did then you may just be the most gullible person on the planet. If you didn't do you think someone who lied under oath should be disqualified from the Supreme Court?
Good questions -
I’d say I’m 50/50 on them
I’d like to have known more about both of them.
The place for this to have been decide is a criminal court
Only she didn’t want to go that route.
So He got elected.
-
Dude I am over it. We're just talking here...
Nah, you're still really frustrated by it. I can tell this doesn't sit well with you at all, or you'd have let this (admittedly excellent) thread die a natural death. Ford moved on and got her bags of money and her fame. Kavanaugh for appointed. Trump's moved onto other things. It's over man. Let it go.
-
Good questions -
I’d say I’m 50/50 on them
I’d like to have known more about both of them.
The place for this to have been decide is a criminal court
Only she didn’t want to go that route.
So He got elected.
I think the place to decide if he was lying under oath would have been a thorough background check by the FBI. It would have been pretty easy to gather enough information to show he was obviouly lying about those 3 things.. and for me.. and should be for most of America, if a nominee for the Supreme Court is shown to be lying under oath about small things like that.. what else might he lie about?
-
Yes, if I did it and she came around 38 years later to accuse me, I would certainly admit it. I am vying for a seat on the Supreme court. I am a federal judge. I certainly believe I could survive telling the truth. Anyone can tell the truth when there is no cost. Integrity and character come into play when it will cost and you still do it.
Okay - I’ll take your word for that.
-
I think the place to decide if he was lying under oath would have been a thorough background check by the FBI. It would have been pretty easy to gather enough information to show he was obviouly lying about those 3 things.. and for me.. and should be for most of America, if a nominee for the Supreme Court is shown to be lying under oath about small things like that.. what else might he lie about?
It was thorough. The only people who don't believe it were the people who voted against him. The six he had before were thorough too. He got 1200+ questions asked of him by the Senate. There's more than all SCOTUS nominees COMBINED in U.S. history. Even Gorsuch only got like 200.
-
Okay - I’ll take your word for that.
His word doesn't mean dick around these parts. Straw Man's credibility is bulletproof by comparison.
-
Okay - I’ll take your word for that.
what would you have done?
-
You're a disgusting person if you doubt the FBI is anything but an apolitical, professional body of dedicated men and women who represent the best of law enforcement in the United States. That's like someone saying he doesn't agree with the local cops' verdict on the people who burglarized his house so he wants them to start over again. It doesn't work like that. You don't demand investigations until you get the outcome you WANT.
-
It was thorough. The only people who don't believe it were the people who voted against him. The six he had before were thorough too. He got 1200+ questions asked of him by the Senate. There's more than all SCOTUS nominees COMBINED in U.S. history. Even Gorsuch only got like 200.
No, when he testified about the Renate Alumnus, Bart O'Kavenaugh etc.. the FBI never even looked into it. They focused on the one incident. Apparently lying under oath is no big deal anymore
-
No, when he testified about the Renate Alumnus, Bart O'Kavenaugh etc.. the FBI never even looked into it. They focused on the one incident. Apparently lying under oath is no big deal anymore
The mandate was: Find out whether Christine Ford's accusation about him was true. Whether he lied about drinking games or a skull & bones secret club he belonged to in his yearbook was not relevant. Period. Point blank.
-
His word doesn't mean dick around these parts. Straw Man's credibility is bulletproof by comparison.
Why are we slipping back into insult mode? Doesn't that get old?
-
I think the place to decide if he was lying under oath would have been a thorough background check by the FBI. It would have been pretty easy to gather enough information to show he was obviouly lying about those 3 things.. and for me.. and should be for most of America, if a nominee for the Supreme Court is shown to be lying under oath about small things like that.. what else might he lie about?
We’re getting in to semantics here and going nowhere
It should of been a criminal trial and all her accusations would of been
Investigated & and his answers also
And The jury would come up with a decision
As this isn’t going to happen it’s all what ifs.
And pointless.
You believe her & I Don’t.
-
The mandate was: Find out whether Christine Ford's accusation about him his true. Whether he lied about drinking games or a skull & bones secret club he belonged to in his yearbook was not relevant. Period. Point blank.
Lying under oath is a thing. It's a big thing. But not recently. I don't want a SCJ that I know lies under oath sitting on the bench. But that's just me
-
Why are we slipping back into insult mode? Doesn't that get old?
You're doing this on purpose to trigger us and you're succeeding because you're insulting our intelligence and the way law enforcement works because you don't like this guy. And then you have the nerve to deny it and act like we're the ones who are out of touch with the situation. It's silly. Let liars be liars, let rape victims be rape victims. Live a wonderful life.
-
It was thorough. The only people who don't believe it were the people who voted against him. The six he had before were thorough too. He got 1200+ questions asked of him by the Senate. There's more than all SCOTUS nominees COMBINED in U.S. history. Even Gorsuch only got like 200.
Ahh but that’s stil not enough for him.
;D
-
We’re getting in to semantics here and going nowhere
It should of been a criminal trial and all her accusations would of been
Investigated & and his answers also
And The jury would come up with a decision
As this isn’t going to happen it’s all what ifs.
And pointless.
You believe her & I Don’t.
I think for her purpose, it was brought to the right place. She was just mistaken that they would care.
-
Lying under oath is a thing. It's a big thing. But not recently. I don't want a SCJ that I know lies under oath sitting on the bench. But that's just me
The SENATE had the final say over whether he lied or not, and whether he was fit or not. It had far more power than the FBI, which as Biden eloquently put it in 1991, does NOT reach conclusions. Senators do. And the senate spoke. They approved him and that's all that matters.
-
I think for her purpose, it was brought to the right place. She was just mistaken that they would care.
She could buy you four new houses in Florida thanks to her letter.
-
You're doing this on purpose to trigger us and you're succeeding because you're insulting our intelligence and the way law enforcement works because you don't like this guy. And then you have the nerve to deny it and act like we're the ones who are out of touch with the situation. It's silly. Let liars be lairs, let rape victims be rape victims. Live a wonderful life.
Man I am sorry. I didn't realize you were the victim here. I will try and say things you agree with more often so you won't feel compelled to act like that
-
Man I am sorry. I didn't realize you were the victim here. I will try and say things you agree with more often so you won't feel compelled to act like that
You don't have to agree with me or Illuminati. You do have to respect the FBI and our Senate confirmation process if you care about this country as much as you say you do. You're putting a nobody out of nowhere on a pedestal and elevating her to the same status as a federal circuit court judge. That's absurd.
-
Lying under oath is a thing. It's a big thing. But not recently. I don't want a SCJ that I know lies under oath sitting on the bench. But that's just me
Hey I dont Want Cops Lying / Planting evidence / turning a blind eye / switching off body cameras / Shooting / beating Innocent People / Etc etc & They’re all under Oath - But That’s Just Me. ;D
-
You don't have to agree with me or Illuminati. You do have to respect the FBI and our Senate confirmation process if you care about this country as much as you say you do. You're putting a nobody out of nowhere on a pedestal and elevating her to the same status as a federal circuit court judge. That's absurd.
I'm just saying.. and forgive me for being so ludicrous.. that FOR ME... lying under oath should disqualify you from being a Supreme Court Justice.. a school superintendent., a police officer, a whole host of positions where people depend on your integrity to make decisions about them
-
Hey I dont Want Cops Lying / Planting evidence / turning a blind eye / switching off body cameras / Shooting / beating Innocent People / Etc etc & They’re all under Oath - But That’s Just Me. ;D
They do that stuff all the time.
-
I'm just saying.. and forgive me for being so ludicrous.. that FOR ME... lying under oath should disqualify you from being a Supreme Court Justice.. a school superintendent., a police officer, a whole host of positions where people depend on your integrity to make decisions about them
Everybody lies. Every President we've had did. How about we just fire everyone and get it over with.
-
They do that stuff all the time.
and it's ok with you? Because that's pretty much what you have said
-
and it's ok with you? Because that's pretty much what you have said
Yeah, it is. Because for every bad deed they do, they do 50 good ones. They keep us safe, even if they get a blowjob from a prostitute in their car in an alley to avoid taking her to jail for the bag of coke in her purse.
-
Everybody lies. Every President we've had did. How about we just fire everyone and get it over with.
I can't believe we are really arguing about this.. in your mind it is no big deal that he lied under oath because everybody does... I'm not there yet.
-
I think for her purpose, it was brought to the right place. She was just mistaken that they would care.
Her purpose was Dirty Tactics as we’d seen all along to stop him getting nominated
They Thought it was Going to be Their Trump Card - Only it wasn’t
It was Trumps Trump Card That Won.
-
I can't believe we are really arguing about this.. in your mind it is no big deal that he lied under oath because everybody does... I'm not there yet.
I forget sometimes that your second career as a monk has placed a great burden on your shoulders and redefined your relationship with the truth in a way that makes everyone compromised because they talk some shit that isn't true every now and then. ;)
-
Her purpose was Dirty Tactics as we’d seen all along to stop him getting nominated
They Thought it was Going to be Their Trump Card - Only it wasn’t
It was Trumps Trump Card That Won.
nah that was her purpose at first
later, when it became profitable, it was all about the money
she didn't just get a million off the idiocy of the donating public
she got millions from liberal billionaires like soros as well
don't worry, she can retire early thanks to this publicity stunt
-
and it's ok with you? Because that's pretty much what you have said
And it’s okay with you
As you’re always quick to defend them and point out any little subtleties
That may protect / help clear them.
We don’t see you on you’re high horse condemning them.
Double standards or what.
-
And it’s okay with you
As you’re always quick to defend them and point out any little subtleties
That may protect / help clear them.
We don’t see you on you’re high horse condemning them.
Double standards or what.
If this is how he did his job as a sexual assault victims investigator, I shiver for the men accused by the women he dealt with. The way he talks it sounds like he's about ready to get in bed with them.
-
Agnostic's favorite show gets it right.
-
If this is how he did his job as a sexual assault victims investigator, I shiver for the men accused by the women he dealt with. The way he talks it sounds like he's about ready to get in bed with them.
I like Agnostic & though I’ve crossed verbal swords many times with him
I’ve appreciated & even learnt from some of his answers.
Sadly now some of his responses recently I find very troubling
For him to say some of the things he has it does bring into
Question his policing -
He’s now become psychic & Judge & jury in some of his answers
Not the reasoned rational Agnostic of previous.
-
It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.
Oh please. As Senator Collins explained, it couldn’t be proven based on a preponderance. That’s 50 percent plus a feather.
She had zero contemporary corroborating evidence. Rachel Mitchell nailed it.
-
We've been over this already over a month.
He claims it'll never happen because he never did anything wrong. But if it does, he'll call on an ex-colleague of his, a female detective with a lot of experience, who'll be his character reference. If that doesn't cut it, all his ex-coworkers will pitch in. And if that's not enough, his years as a sexual assault survivor team member will surely convince skeptics that he couldn't possibly be guilty, since cops who hunt predators are never predators themselves.
I got news for him. When they're ready for your white ass, even a 30 year career in law enforcement can't help you. A few accusations later, you're grimy and fit for an orange jumpsuit in the eyes of the community, whether true or not.
Did he say that? Incredibly naive.
-
His word doesn't mean dick around these parts. Straw Man's credibility is bulletproof by comparison.
Uh, no. Lol
-
I like Agnostic & though I’ve crossed verbal swords many times with him
I’ve appreciated & even learnt from some of his answers.
Sadly now some of his responses recently I find very troubling
For him to say some of the things he has it does bring into
Question his policing -
He’s now become psychic & Judge & jury in some of his answers
Not the reasoned rational Agnostic of previous.
I don’t think it’s fair to criticize his profession, but he has definitely become a left wing liberal on this board.
-
Everybody lies. Every President we've had did. How about we just fire everyone and get it over with.
Fire them or overthrow them. Nothing wrong with a little chaos every now and then.
As far as lies in government, lol @ acting offended by it, government officials have been lying since the invention of government and it won't change.
-
I don’t think it’s fair to criticize his profession, but he has definitely become a left wing liberal on this board.
I’m making a observation based on how his posts have been & what he’s saying,
As stated I’ve held Agnostic in high regard even though we’ve frequently disagreed.
He’s gone very left wing liberal & lost his reasoned middle ground outlook of Before.
And let’s be honest policing has an awful lot of very questionable individuals in its
Ranks And seriously needs a thorough house clean.
Though that’s for a different thread.
-
I’m making a observation based on how his posts have been & what he’s saying,
As stated I’ve held Agnostic in high regard even though we’ve frequently disagreed.
He’s gone very left wing liberal & lost his reasoned middle ground outlook of Before.
And let’s be honest policing has an awful lot of very questionable individuals in its
Ranks And seriously needs a thorough house clean.
Though that’s for a different thread.
Personally, I think you've been taking it way too easy on him. He's one of those guys that if you back off for even an hour, he starts with his nonsense again and recycles the same talking points that were already discussed a month earlier. I know who's reasonable on here with strong opinions and who's plainly irrational and confrontational on every point raised, and he's definitely not the former. I don't insult his occupation because I respect his occupation, and while I've seen no proof that he worked in law enforcement, chaos vouches for him and I trust chaos's judgment.
That being said, I liked these types of replies a lot more. They were effective at ending that ridiculous back-and-forth in ND's thread. I'd like to see more of them used with A007. Guarantee he wouldn't stick around for long. ;)
Back again
Peadophile Pervert.
In bold letters so your stupid thick brain can take it in.
FUCK OFF.
I’M NOT & NEITHER IS ANYONE ELSE AFRAID OF YOU
AND YOUR PATHETIC THREATS.
WE’RE NOT GOING TO MEET - LUCKILY FOR YOU - SO GET OVER IT.
FUCK OFF BACK TO WHATEVER PAEDO / PERVERT INTERNET SITE
YOU USUALLY FREQUENT - AND BE THE PATHETIC BRAGGART WEAKLING ON THERE.
Just how many quotes of a very questionable nature is there on this board.
Peadophile Pervert.
Dismissed.
-
Personally, I think you've been taking it way too easy on him. He's one of those guys that if you back off for even an hour, he starts with his nonsense again and recycles the same talking points that were already discussed a month earlier. I know who's reasonable on here with strong opinions and who's plainly irrational and confrontational on every point raised, and he's definitely not the former. I don't insult his occupation because I respect his occupation, and while I've seen no proof that he worked in law enforcement, chaos vouches for him and I trust chaos's judgment.
That being said, I liked these types of replies a lot more. They were effective at ending that ridiculous back-and-forth in ND's thread. I'd like to see more of them used with A007. Guarantee he wouldn't stick around for long. ;)
Ha ha - Thanks for your advice & support.
As I’ve said before - Please be careful with referencing you know how
As he may easily take umbrage with you and Threaten all sorts of
Untold horrors & beatings also Demand you post pictures of yourself ::)
Lest this thread be ravaged by him.
;D
-
Guys. I'm right here.. I can hear you..
-
And it’s okay with you
As you’re always quick to defend them and point out any little subtleties
That may protect / help clear them.
We don’t see you on you’re high horse condemning them.
Double standards or what.
Depends on what you consider a double standard. If by double standard you mean that I may point out things from my point of view that you may not have considered then absolutely. If you mean by double standard that I don't always agree with your opinion on a police matter then yes.. I guess it all depends on what you want to call a double standard. As for condemning them.. all you have to do is visit the thread that talks about the officer that shot the teen with a knife, where I said I watched the video and the shooting wasn't justified to see that I do try and call a duck a duck. Am I biased towards police, absolutely. I am pro police. But unless you are suffering from selective memory, you should recall times when I condemned them.
-
Depends on what you consider a double standard. If by double standard you mean that I may point out things from my point of view that you may not have considered then absolutely. If you mean by double standard that I don't always agree with your opinion on a police matter then yes.. I guess it all depends on what you want to call a double standard. As for condemning them.. all you have to do is visit the thread that talks about the officer that shot the teen with a knife, where I said I watched the video and the shooting wasn't justified to see that I do try and call a duck a duck. Am I biased towards police, absolutely. I am pro police. But unless you are suffering from selective memory, you should recall times when I condemned them.
Ahhh - Now That’s more like the agnostic I know and cross verbal swords with.
Likewise I / we point out things you may not of considered
We very seldom agree on police matters
And that’s a very rare occasion you’ve condemned a cop. :o
I call a scumbag a scumbag cop or otherwise
I’m neither pro or anti cops.
-
Exactly - You don’t say there not the same ::) Really
She & The Democraps did the senate route
1, because the burden of proof upon her was no existent
2, to derail & stop him getting elected
Of Course she never had any intention of going with criminal charges
She would’ve opened herself up to all sorts of potential problems.
Piece of crap she is & her idiot supporters.
I'm sorry, was there some other route suitable and timely? I didn't know.
-
Only on Getbig do the idiots keep rehashing what is over and done with. Kavanaugh was confirmed. He's a Supreme Court Justice. Y'all can whine and moan about what got him there all you want. but you're merely spinning your wheels at this point. Next...
-
I'm sorry, was there some other route suitable and timely? I didn't know.
In the intervening 34/36/38yrs whichever you choose
Yes there was an other route & Likely more than 1.
-
Yes, if I did it and she came around 38 years later to accuse me, I would certainly admit it. I am vying for a seat on the Supreme court. I am a federal judge. I certainly believe I could survive telling the truth. Anyone can tell the truth when there is no cost. Integrity and character come into play when it will cost and you still do it.
I don't think your accuser would be a female. tbh
-
Exactly!
1. The republicans had more senators to confirm him, so he got in.
2. They'll be some inevitable political backlash during next months election.
Pretty simple.
True they did.
And it’s just as well they did after the atrocious behaviour of many against him
Purely because he’s a conservative- Nothing else ::)
Until that wasn’t going to work so they drum up Dr Ford & Her amazingly accurate
Memory- Who in Fact can’t remember Fcuk All - Except it Was Him.... ::)
Yeah Right - Those like you bought it hook line & sinker.
-
I don't think your accuser would be a female. tbh
He strikes me as the type of husband who sweet talks his wife, pushes the shopping cart, makes her breakfast in bed, and gets her to agree to let him have sex with other men as long as he keeps it out of her bedroom. So yeah, I agree with you.
-
What about using the strap on?
As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.
-
As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.
I don’t see either of them as being queer or part queer.
Jeez Howard’s working his way through marrying all available milfs / cougars
I congratulate him on that.
Maybe he’s deep in the closet very deep in - With another woman ;D
-
You're a funny dude and that was pretty clever zinger.
We obviously don't agree on too many political issues.
But, WTF, that shouldn't trigger a string of insult filled retorts.
I'm nothing great and I lack the desire or talent to ever run for high office.
BUT, I'm not angry and feel good about my life overall.
On a serious note, I see a lot of different people out there , who seem really angry and pissed off at life.
If your life sucks, don't blame a politician.
Get out there and get a new job, get divorced,remarried, new gf, bf, whatever. Just go do something to change things.
Yelling at GOP senators or wearing a MAGA hat while insulting liberals, won't change your life.
For some , it seems to be their life.
That's how the Left rationalizes everything: If you don't like your situation, improve it. Who cares about the world around you.
That is not what conservatism is all about. We don't have the luxury of turning a blind eye while our entire culture, our media, our political system, and our social fabric disintegrate due to a small group of misfits that want to change everything for everyone just because something offends them or doesn't seem fair to them. MeToo, the right for men to piss in female bathrooms as long as they identify as women, men marrying other men or joining the military while openly espousing views that bother a good number of our troops, and a ton of other things are all reasons why we're upset not just at "liberals" but at where our country is headed. This isn't my dad's America anymore and it's all because of you.
-
If Trump said take personal responsibility for your life, you'd wear it on a t shirt.
I could declare that Kwon3 is the ultimate ladies man, and you'd post a pic at a pride parade in assless chaps.
The difference is Trump keeps his promises. That's why his supporters continue supporting him long after his novelty wore off. I can post a recent liberal MSNBC panel that acknowledged that he delivers and that's a big part of his appeal. The left rarely says what it thinks or thinks what it says, and almost never remembers the campaign promises it made during election years. That's where Trump is head and shoulders above the opposition. He also speaks candidly without a filter, something neither other republicans nor democrats have ever done, since their careers are more important than their truth.
-
As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.
Certainly wouldn't be a first
-
The difference is Trump keeps his promises. That's why his supporters continue supporting him long after his novelty wore off. I can post a recent liberal MSNBC panel that acknowledged that he delivers and that's a big part of his appeal. The left rarely says what it thinks or thinks what it says, and almost never remembers the campaign promises it made during election years. That's where Trump is head and shoulders above the opposition. He also speaks candidly without a filter, something neither other republicans nor democrats have ever done, since their careers are more important than their truth.
And this is why you can't be taken seriously
-
And this is why you can't be taken seriously
Go take a read and come back when you're done.
(You won't)
https://www.promiseskept.com/ (https://www.promiseskept.com/)
-
Go take a read and come back when you're done.
(You won't)
https://www.promiseskept.com/ (https://www.promiseskept.com/)
Chiming in....I read it. IMO the points are both overstated and premature. However, these are things Trump promised to do.
-
A Conservative wants the country to stay just as f***ed up as it currently is.
A Liberal wants the country to be even more f***ed up.
-
A Conservative wants the country to stay just as f***ed up as it currently is.
A Liberal wants the country to be even more f***ed up.
I liked the country just fine until Bill Clinton. We could live in 1988 forever and I'd be truly content with that.
-
Go take a read and come back when you're done.
(You won't)
https://www.promiseskept.com/ (https://www.promiseskept.com/)
Go Donald
It’s Pathetic that Leftist would dislike someone so much
That is doing such a Good job.
The world Needs more leaders like Donald
And far less airy fairy spineless politically correct scared of their own shadows
Liberal Leftist contaminated with the feminisation.
-
Go Donald
It’s Pathetic that Leftist would dislike someone so much
That is doing such a Good job.
The world Needs more leaders like Donald
And far less airy fairy spineless politically correct scared of their own shadows
Liberal Leftist contaminated with the feminisation.
You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.
-
You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.
? ::)
Pathetic reply.
Is that the best you can muster.
-
You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.
This doesn't even make sense. He said "leaders not "dictators". Why would he want more dictators? Is that what you want? When did the definition of "leader" get changed?
-
This doesn't even make sense. He said "leaders not "dictators". Why would he want more dictators? Is that what you want? When did the definition of "leader" get changed?
It got changed in the confused mixed up head of his.
-
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/
I like the promise that he wouldn't have time to play golf
-
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/
I like the promise that he wouldn't have time to play golf
Imagine the meltdowns if he didn't! :o
-
These people are like little kids.
Susan Collins' honorary degree should be rescinded, nearly 1,500 St. Lawrence University faculty, alumni say
By Kaitlyn Schallhorn | Fox News
Senator Susan Collins has been targeted by liberal activist after she pledged to vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Nearly 1,500 St. Lawrence University alumni and faculty are calling on the school to rescind an honorary degree Sen. Susan Collins was awarded last year because of her vote to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
A more moderate Republican, Collins was targeted by liberal activists and those opposed to Kavanaugh – particularly after allegations of sexual assault came to light – who thought she could abandon her party and vote against confirming the judge. But ahead of the vote, Collins said she didn't believe the charges could "fairly prevent Judge Kavanaugh from serving on the Court.”
Kavanaugh, who vehemently denied the decades-old sexual misconduct claims against him, was confirmed in a narrow 50-48 vote despite testimony from accuser Christine Blasey Ford.
More than 1,300 alumni of St. Lawrence University in New York signed onto a letter saying Collins “lack[ s] the integrity and commitment to justice that we expect from the St. Lawrence body.”
“We ask that the University revoke this honorary degree as we find that she is not deserving of it in the face of her recent actions. We ask the university to do this in support of truth and for all of the victims of sexual assault and violence, of which many of her fellow alumni and students have suffered,” the letter read, in part.
Nearly 100 faculty members have also demanded the university revoke the degree to “communicate that we find the dismantling of rape culture more important than saving face or avoiding critique that has the potential to threaten relationships with people who wield considerable power.”
They said Collins “did not carefully weigh all the available evidence” when determining Ford’s testimony was “lacking credibility.”
Collins graduated from St. Lawrence University in 1975. She was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws degree in 1998 and an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters degree in 2017. The letters from alumni and faculty specifically ask for the revocation of the 2017 degree.
In a statement, St. Lawrence University spokesman Ryan Deuel told Fox News the school has “no intention” of rescinding the degree, noting it has never before done so.
Collins has faced intense backlash since the Oct. 6 vote. Linda Sarsour, a far-left activist and a leader of the Women’s March, said Collins “talking about presumption of innocence that is never offered to Black men in America” was a sign of “white supremacy on the Senate Floor.”
Linda Sarsour
✔
@lsarsour
A white woman Senator is talking about presumption of innocence that is never offered to Black men in America. You are watching white supremacy live on the Senate Floor. #SusanCollins #CancelKanavaugh
9:51 AM - Oct 5, 2018
11.6K
7,283 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Authorities were called to Collins’ Bangor, Maine, home Monday after a threatening letter containing what the author said was poison ricin was delivered there. An FBI spokesman told The Associated Press preliminary tests to the envelope indicated there was no threat to the public.
Collins spokesperson Annie Clark said the “incident is the latest in a series of threats against Senator Collins, her loved ones, and her staff.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/susan-collins-honorary-degree-should-be-rescinded-nearly-1500-st-lawrence-university-faculty-alumni-say
-
This doesn't even make sense. He said "leaders not "dictators". Why would he want more dictators? Is that what you want? When did the definition of "leader" get changed?
Most of the leaders he's referring to are in fact dictators by nature of their totalitarian governing style.
Rodrigo Duterte, Philippines
Vladimir Putin, Russia
Xi Jinping, China
Kim Jong Un, North Korea
Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, Egypt
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey
-
Most of the leaders he's referring to are in fact dictators by nature of their totalitarian governing style.
Rodrigo Duterte, Philippines
Vladimir Putin, Russia
Xi Jinping, China
Kim Jong Un, North Korea
Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, Egypt
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey
EXCUSE ME - You Haven’t a FUCKING Clue
I Was Referring To Donald - No one Else,
That’s why I only Named Him.
Please Brush up your Reading Comprehension Skills.
Also I’m very forthright in stating what I Mean - If I’d wanted to include other leaders I would’ve.
I’ll await your Apology.
-
EXCUSE ME - You Haven’t a FUCKING Clue
I Was Referring To Donald - No one Else,
That’s why I only Named Him.
Please Brush up your Reading Comprehension Skills.
Also I’m very forthright in stating what I Mean - If I’d wanted to include other leaders I would’ve.
I’ll await your Apology.
Why are you so wound up? Retracing these posts, you appear to be responding, yet again, to something I posted on October 12th. The first time you replied, you didn't seem to be upset and now you do. What's up?
Sorry if I misunderstood your original post on this matter. I do think it is time to let it go, though.
-
Why are you so wound up? Retracing these posts, you appear to be responding, yet again, to something I posted on October 12th. The first time you replied, you didn't seem to be upset and now you do. What's up?
Sorry if I misunderstood your original post on this matter. I do think it is time to let it go, though.
No not wound up.
Very pissed at your reply I found it insulting
As I Made no mention of anyone other than Donald.
And for you to insinuate I had Donald in with a bunch of dictators 🤬😱
As stated I don’t have any issues stating what I think / how I feel.
At least you replied.
-
No not wound up.
Very pissed at your reply I found it insulting
As I Made no mention of anyone other than Donald.
And for you to insinuate I had Donald in with a bunch of dictators 🤬😱
As stated I don’t have any issues stating what I think / how I feel.
At least you replied.
And I apologized.
-
And I apologized.
That's because you're a professional ballspew drinker with the testosterone levels of Terri Schiavo's brain stem.
-
No not wound up.
Very pissed at your reply I found it insulting
Meltdown
-
Meltdown
;D
Calm now.
😂😂😂
-
And I apologized.
Yes.
Good of you.
👍🏻
-
that's the thing about illuminati
You Read His Posts And Think he's going to let something Go because he started it with Something conciliatory like "Fair enough" or "I agree"
but then he hits you with a last-minute curve ball Colombo-style like "However you ignored my real question So I suspect you're full of shit"
hahahaa
-
that's the thing about illuminati
You Read His Posts And Think he's going to let something Go because he started it with Something conciliatory like "Fair enough" or "I agree"
but then he hits you with a last-minute curve ball Colombo-style like "However you ignored my real question So I suspect you're full of shit"
hahahaa
He is wiley that way
-
;D
Calm now.
😂😂😂
Some high rep squats always help. 8)
-
;)
-
https://www.dailywire.com/news/38006/senate-judiciary-committee-report-45-interviews-james-barrett?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro&fbclid=IwAR18QEwXz-6nWINB8P58_s5RsRjjGwoIFiu-SNpJUeTmPHq-72V1LgcEMO4
45 Interviews - this was a total SHAM
-
Nolte: Best News of 2018 Midterm Is Kavanaugh Backlash Against Senate Democrats
7 Nov 2018
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/07/nolte-best-news-of-2018-midterm-is-kavanaugh-backlash-against-senate-democrats/
-
oh boy...
-
These people are just incapable of handling a loss.
House Judiciary Democrat says Justice Kavanaugh will 'likely' be investigated for perjury
By Andrew O'Reilly | Fox News
(https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/01/1862/1048/Kav-CO-Crop.jpg?ve=1&tl=1)
Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., (right) claims Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh (left) committed perjury during the tense confirmation hearing last year, but does not say which specific statement is problematic. (AP/House.gov)
A freshman Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee told constituents the panel will “likely” investigate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh for purportedly committing perjury during his confirmation hearings last fall.
In a video sent out by conservative activist group America Rising, Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., was recorded Friday saying he believes the Supreme Court justice committed perjury while under questioning from Congress -- though did not point to a specific statement.
“There’s no question [Kavanaugh] committed perjury during the confirmation hearings and so forth,” Neguse said, responding to a question about the possibility of impeaching Kavanaugh. “I think the Judiciary Committee is likely to take that up.”
Kavanaugh’s confirmation process last fall was nearly derailed by numerous accusations of sexual misconduct tied to the judge's time in high school at Georgetown Prep and college at Yale University.
KAVANAUGH ACCUSERS: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?
Kavanaugh vehemently denied all of them, including claims from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford that he sexually assaulted her when both were high school students. On top of that controversy, Democrats have also previously claimed Kavanaugh lied to lawmakers -- including about his drinking habits and the meaning of terms in his high school yearbook.
Days after the midterm elections in November, now-Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., was overheard on an Amtrak train discussing the possibility of impeaching Kavanaugh, while Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez in December spoke about reform proposals to the Supreme Court.
KAVANAUGH SWORN IN AS 114TH SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, HOURS AFTER SENATE VOTES TO CONFIRM
But with Democrats assuming the House majority earlier this month, and with it the power to investigate and subpoena witnesses, the Kavanaugh controversy has largely taken a backseat to other Trump-related issues like his tax returns and alleged Russia connections.
Despite the uproar and accusations last fall, Kavanaugh was eventually confirmed by the Senate in an almost party-line vote of 50-48. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia was the lone Democrat to support Kavanaugh.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-judiciary-democrat-says-that-justice-kavanaugh-will-likely-be-investigated-for-perjury
-
Another welfare idiot qualified to do nothing else than politics
These people are just incapable of handling a loss.
House Judiciary Democrat says Justice Kavanaugh will 'likely' be investigated for perjury
By Andrew O'Reilly | Fox News
(https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/01/1862/1048/Kav-CO-Crop.jpg?ve=1&tl=1)
Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., (right) claims Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh (left) committed perjury during the tense confirmation hearing last year, but does not say which specific statement is problematic. (AP/House.gov)
A freshman Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee told constituents the panel will “likely” investigate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh for purportedly committing perjury during his confirmation hearings last fall.
In a video sent out by conservative activist group America Rising, Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., was recorded Friday saying he believes the Supreme Court justice committed perjury while under questioning from Congress -- though did not point to a specific statement.
“There’s no question [Kavanaugh] committed perjury during the confirmation hearings and so forth,” Neguse said, responding to a question about the possibility of impeaching Kavanaugh. “I think the Judiciary Committee is likely to take that up.”
Kavanaugh’s confirmation process last fall was nearly derailed by numerous accusations of sexual misconduct tied to the judge's time in high school at Georgetown Prep and college at Yale University.
KAVANAUGH ACCUSERS: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?
Kavanaugh vehemently denied all of them, including claims from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford that he sexually assaulted her when both were high school students. On top of that controversy, Democrats have also previously claimed Kavanaugh lied to lawmakers -- including about his drinking habits and the meaning of terms in his high school yearbook.
Days after the midterm elections in November, now-Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., was overheard on an Amtrak train discussing the possibility of impeaching Kavanaugh, while Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez in December spoke about reform proposals to the Supreme Court.
KAVANAUGH SWORN IN AS 114TH SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, HOURS AFTER SENATE VOTES TO CONFIRM
But with Democrats assuming the House majority earlier this month, and with it the power to investigate and subpoena witnesses, the Kavanaugh controversy has largely taken a backseat to other Trump-related issues like his tax returns and alleged Russia connections.
Despite the uproar and accusations last fall, Kavanaugh was eventually confirmed by the Senate in an almost party-line vote of 50-48. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia was the lone Democrat to support Kavanaugh.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-judiciary-democrat-says-that-justice-kavanaugh-will-likely-be-investigated-for-perjury
-
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.
U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.
Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of-gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing
Second congressional Democrat staffer charged in scheme to 'dox' Republicans amid Kavanaugh confirmation fight
A second aide to New Hampshire Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan is facing federal charges stemming from a scheme to publicly post the personal information of several Republican politicians amid the contentious confirmation hearings for now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The aide, Samantha Deforest Davis, was a staff assistant in Hassan’s office from August 2017 until last December. She was fired after Capitol Police discovered her possible involvement in the so-called "doxing" effort.
Court documents accuse Davis of aiding 27-year-old Jackson A. Cosko, a former Hassan aide who has pleaded guilty to five federal offenses, including two counts of making public restricted personal information, and one count each of computer fraud, witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors alleged Wednesday that Davis was persuaded by Cosko to "wipe down" Senate computers he had hacked. Davis now faces two misdemeanor charges: one federal count of aiding and abetting computer fraud and a District count of attempted evidence tampering, the Washington Post reported.
Also on Wednesday, Cosko was sentenced to four years in prison in the scheme, and was required to turn over the cell phones, computers, and other equipment he used.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/second-house-democrat-staffer-charged-in-scheme-to-doxx-republicans-amid-kavanaugh-confirmation-fight
-
Second congressional Democrat staffer charged in scheme to 'dox' Republicans amid Kavanaugh confirmation fight
A second aide to New Hampshire Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan is facing federal charges stemming from a scheme to publicly post the personal information of several Republican politicians amid the contentious confirmation hearings for now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The aide, Samantha Deforest Davis, was a staff assistant in Hassan’s office from August 2017 until last December. She was fired after Capitol Police discovered her possible involvement in the so-called "doxing" effort.
Court documents accuse Davis of aiding 27-year-old Jackson A. Cosko, a former Hassan aide who has pleaded guilty to five federal offenses, including two counts of making public restricted personal information, and one count each of computer fraud, witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors alleged Wednesday that Davis was persuaded by Cosko to "wipe down" Senate computers he had hacked. Davis now faces two misdemeanor charges: one federal count of aiding and abetting computer fraud and a District count of attempted evidence tampering, the Washington Post reported.
Also on Wednesday, Cosko was sentenced to four years in prison in the scheme, and was required to turn over the cell phones, computers, and other equipment he used.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/second-house-democrat-staffer-charged-in-scheme-to-doxx-republicans-amid-kavanaugh-confirmation-fight
Awesome @!!
-
Second congressional Democrat staffer charged in scheme to 'dox' Republicans amid Kavanaugh confirmation fight
A second aide to New Hampshire Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan is facing federal charges stemming from a scheme to publicly post the personal information of several Republican politicians amid the contentious confirmation hearings for now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The aide, Samantha Deforest Davis, was a staff assistant in Hassan’s office from August 2017 until last December. She was fired after Capitol Police discovered her possible involvement in the so-called "doxing" effort.
Court documents accuse Davis of aiding 27-year-old Jackson A. Cosko, a former Hassan aide who has pleaded guilty to five federal offenses, including two counts of making public restricted personal information, and one count each of computer fraud, witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors alleged Wednesday that Davis was persuaded by Cosko to "wipe down" Senate computers he had hacked. Davis now faces two misdemeanor charges: one federal count of aiding and abetting computer fraud and a District count of attempted evidence tampering, the Washington Post reported.
Also on Wednesday, Cosko was sentenced to four years in prison in the scheme, and was required to turn over the cell phones, computers, and other equipment he used.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/second-house-democrat-staffer-charged-in-scheme-to-doxx-republicans-amid-kavanaugh-confirmation-fight
Awesome @!!
Yep. Rare to see people in DC actually being held accountable. They are little fish, so that probably explains it, but still awesome.
-
Yep. Rare to see people in DC actually being held accountable. They are little fish, so that probably explains it, but still awesome.
It is about damn time.