Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Darren Avey on January 09, 2019, 09:23:10 AM
-
Word
-
A knife carrying moped rider? Damn that's G.
-
Police in London cant chanse a moped riding criminal, too dangerous for the criminal.
And no gun carrying police, what a pussy country...
-
Police in London cant chanse a moped riding criminal, too dangerous for the criminal.
And no gun carrying police, what a pussy country...
It's pathetic..there aren't many real men like me left over here
-
Police in London cant chanse a moped riding criminal, too dangerous for the criminal.
And no gun carrying police, what a pussy country...
they can chase mopeds, they can even hit them which they call "tactical contact". but at other times, depending on the seriousness of the suspected crime, traffic conditions, etc, they will give up chase.
there have been a good number of incidents where innocents have been killed during police chases. so they weigh up the risks of the actual chase to the risks the suspects pose if they get away and then make a jusgement call on whether pursuit is in the public interest.
re armed police. you only have to look at the overall murder rate, how many are killed with guns by police and how many police are killed with guns each year, then compare that to somehwere like the US, for clarification that the UK system is preferable.
-
they can chase mopeds, they can even hit them which they call "tactical contact". but at other times, depending on the seriousness of the suspected crime, traffic conditions, etc, they will give up chase.
there have been a good number of incidents where innocents have been killed during police chases. so they weigh up the risks of the actual chase to the risks the suspects pose if they get away and then make a jusgement call on whether pursuit is in the public interest.
re armed police. you only have to look at the overall murder rate, how many are killed with guns by police and how many police are killed with guns each year, then compare that to somehwere like the US, for clarification that the UK system is preferable.
No real deterrent to commit any type crime is what it sounds like.
-
No real deterrent to commit any type crime is what it sounds like.
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
-
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
Libtard says what?
-
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
One cannot compare different countries because of all the variable involved. Mexico and Brazil have much stricter gun laws than the US and no one would argue those are safer less violent countries.
You can compare somewhat apples to apples. For example, two different States in the US. Those with very strict gun control laws like New York and Washington D.C. with those States that allow either or both concealed and open carry like Arizona and Texas. The States with stricter gun laws have considerable more violent crime and gun violence that States with more lenient gun laws.
And it's a staggering leap in logic to imply that more police in the U.S. are shot dead compared to the UK due to carrying firearms. That would imply that they would not have been shot dead if they were unarmed. And it discounts the very real instances where a police officer's life has been saved because they were armed.
And, of course, there is the common sense logic regarding a deterrent. What makes something or someone a deterrent? A deterrent is something that discourages or inhibits someone from acting out a specific form of behavior. If you wanted to commit an act of violence and hurt another person or refuse to follow the orders and directions of another person, wouldn't you choose someone who is weaker than you are? Weaker in the sense that they cannot enforce or stop your actions. Who would you be more likely to attack or ignore their directions or orders? An armed or an unarmed man.
Of course, a deterrent, be it a gun or a border wall, isn't going to stop everybody. Making certain behaviors illegal and punishable doesn't stop everybody. But just because you can't stop everybody doesn't mean you can't stop anybody. Just because not everybody obeys the laws doesn't mean that we should do away with all laws. The greater the deterrent the greater the compliance. That's why there is very little violent crime in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and North Korea. There's tons of corruption but very little violent crime in a society where you have no human rights.
-
they can chase mopeds, they can even hit them which they call "tactical contact". but at other times, depending on the seriousness of the suspected crime, traffic conditions, etc, they will give up chase.
Must of been fake news where they reported they cannot chase a moped.
Sounded way to soft/crazy,but you never know. Police weapons are a torch over there (a flashlight).
-
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
Paki BS, more crime in London than in NY.
"Thanks" to Brussels in many EU countries police don't have a guns , will see U.K. after BREXIT ;D
Nobody was BS good old British Bobbie ;)
-
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
Because we have large numbers of Blacks who have a murder rate 8 times that of non Hispanic Whites....
-
if police having guns is such a great deterrent why is the murder rate so much higher in the US and why are way, way more cops shot dead in the US than the UK?
Why so little murder rate in Japan?
Less Negroids and Mussies.
-
Why so little murder rate in Japan?
Less Negroids and Mussies.
One of the most racist countries in the world.
God Bless them.
-
Why so little murder rate in Japan?
Less Negroids and Mussies.
Facts is facts. Don't allow murderers and thieves into your country, magically there won't be any murders or robberies.
-
One viral image points to Japan as an example of a country that keeps out radical Islam by cracking down on all forms of Islam and its adherents,
implying that this is a good model for the United States to follow.
The graphic is a simple black-and-white block of text with the headline, "Japan keeps Islam at bay by putting restrictions on Islam and ALL Muslims."
The graphic then mentions a variety of ways in which Japan supposedly keeps tight control over the Muslims in its midst:
"Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims"
"Permanent residency is not given to Muslims"
"Propagation of Islam in Japan is banned"
"In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught"
"Japan is the only country in the world with a negligible number of embassies in Islamic countries"
"One cannot import a Koran published in the Arabic language"
"Muslims must follow Japanese law and language".
"The Japanese government is of the opinion that Muslims are fundamentalist, and unwilling to change their Muslim laws"
"Muslims cannot even rent a house in Japan"
"There is no sharia law in Japan"
-
Because we have large numbers of Blacks who have a murder rate 8 times that of non Hispanic Whites....
And as our Numbers of Low IQ Theiving, Drug dealing Blacks increases so does our murder rate.
Hmmm I wonder what the connection could possibly be Mr Plonker Conker ::)
-
One viral image points to Japan as an example of a country that keeps out radical Islam by cracking down on all forms of Islam and its adherents,
implying that this is a good model for the United States to follow.
The graphic is a simple black-and-white block of text with the headline, "Japan keeps Islam at bay by putting restrictions on Islam and ALL Muslims."
The graphic then mentions a variety of ways in which Japan supposedly keeps tight control over the Muslims in its midst:
"Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims"
"Permanent residency is not given to Muslims"
"Propagation of Islam in Japan is banned"
"In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught"
"Japan is the only country in the world with a negligible number of embassies in Islamic countries"
"One cannot import a Koran published in the Arabic language"
"Muslims must follow Japanese law and language".
"The Japanese government is of the opinion that Muslims are fundamentalist, and unwilling to change their Muslim laws"
"Muslims cannot even rent a house in Japan"
"There is no sharia law in Japan"
Bingo ! ! !
Well Done Japan
If France, Germany, Sweden did the same they wouldnt be suffering the Shit storm they are now.
-
One viral image points to Japan as an example of a country that keeps out radical Islam by cracking down on all forms of Islam and its adherents,
implying that this is a good model for the United States to follow.
The graphic is a simple black-and-white block of text with the headline, "Japan keeps Islam at bay by putting restrictions on Islam and ALL Muslims."
The graphic then mentions a variety of ways in which Japan supposedly keeps tight control over the Muslims in its midst:
"Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims"
"Permanent residency is not given to Muslims"
"Propagation of Islam in Japan is banned"
"In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught"
"Japan is the only country in the world with a negligible number of embassies in Islamic countries"
"One cannot import a Koran published in the Arabic language"
"Muslims must follow Japanese law and language".
"The Japanese government is of the opinion that Muslims are fundamentalist, and unwilling to change their Muslim laws"
"Muslims cannot even rent a house in Japan"
"There is no sharia law in Japan"
So there is a promised land.
Always been a huge fan of Japanese people because they are so polite, considerate and hard working. Even more so now. Hawaii has a huge Japanese population that growing up here I thought a lot of the culture and food here was Hawaiian when it was in fact Japanese.
A government that puts its own people first and to hell with what anybody else says.
-
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/muslims-in-japan/
-
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/muslims-in-japan/
Dreams crushed... :'(
Maybe Muslims just don't like Japan. I wonder what it is that discourages them from invading and destroying that nation? Maybe it's all the raw fish and that they pixel out the cawks and vag in porn.
-
One cannot compare different countries because of all the variable involved. Mexico and Brazil have much stricter gun laws than the US and no one would argue those are safer less violent countries.
You can compare somewhat apples to apples. For example, two different States in the US. Those with very strict gun control laws like New York and Washington D.C. with those States that allow either or both concealed and open carry like Arizona and Texas. The States with stricter gun laws have considerable more violent crime and gun violence that States with more lenient gun laws.
And it's a staggering leap in logic to imply that more police in the U.S. are shot dead compared to the UK due to carrying firearms. That would imply that they would not have been shot dead if they were unarmed. And it discounts the very real instances where a police officer's life has been saved because they were armed.
And, of course, there is the common sense logic regarding a deterrent. What makes something or someone a deterrent? A deterrent is something that discourages or inhibits someone from acting out a specific form of behavior. If you wanted to commit an act of violence and hurt another person or refuse to follow the orders and directions of another person, wouldn't you choose someone who is weaker than you are? Weaker in the sense that they cannot enforce or stop your actions. Who would you be more likely to attack or ignore their directions or orders? An armed or an unarmed man.
Of course, a deterrent, be it a gun or a border wall, isn't going to stop everybody. Making certain behaviors illegal and punishable doesn't stop everybody. But just because you can't stop everybody doesn't mean you can't stop anybody. Just because not everybody obeys the laws doesn't mean that we should do away with all laws. The greater the deterrent the greater the compliance. That's why there is very little violent crime in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and North Korea. There's tons of corruption but very little violent crime in a society where you have no human rights.
yes you can compare different countries. nearly all of countries in the developed world have pretty similar (very low) homicide rate apart from the US which is the big outlier. nearly all of the other countries in the developed world have very strict gun control and very few guns in society, pro rata.
the problem in the US is the number of guns in circulation, which stems from the stupidly lax laws. at this stage it's pretty pointless comparing states because it is so easy for anyone in any state with or without strict gun laws to get a gun. the country is awash with guns.
i did not imply that more police are shot in the US because they carry guns. i asked the question that if guns are such great deterrents (as per the gun nut argument) why are police in the US (that all carry guns), killed at such a higher rate than those in the UK that are unarmed? and i am talking at probably 50X plus rate.
and, as is said, police also kill civilians at a far higher rate in the US than in the UK...and that is unarguably a direct result of them carrying guns.
so what i'm saying is when you hear people trying to mock the UK system becuase police are unarmed, which i've seen quite frequently on here. you only need to look at the stats to see which system in reality is working better and by quite some way.
south america is full of 3rd world countries, many with long standing political problems. so comparing them with the US really is comparing apples to oranges. AND it is estimated that hundreds of thousands of US guns illegally cross the border into mexico yearly. so not only is the ridiculous number of guns in circulation having grave consequences on your own society. it is also a major contributor to crime and violence in neighbouring countries too.
-
family blame the government for letting the dindu down
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6576201/Leyton-Waltham-Forest-murder-victim-Jayden-Moodie-pictured-Anthony-Joshua-boxer-hero.html
-
Must of been fake news where they reported they cannot chase a moped.
Sounded way to soft/crazy,but you never know. Police weapons are a torch over there (a flashlight).
probably read it on one of those braindead right wing type sites
-
Most of the knife crime and violence in London is committed by blacks and pakistanis.
-
yes you can compare different countries. nearly all of countries in the developed world have pretty similar (very low) homicide rate apart from the US which is the big outlier. nearly all of the other countries in the developed world have very strict gun control and very few guns in society, pro rata.
the problem in the US is the number of guns in circulation, which stems from the stupidly lax laws. at this stage it's pretty pointless comparing states because it is so easy for anyone in any state with or without strict gun laws to get a gun. the country is awash with guns.
i did not imply that more police are shot in the US because they carry guns. i asked the question that if guns are such great deterrents (as per the gun nut argument) why are police in the US (that all carry guns), killed at such a higher rate than those in the UK that are unarmed? and i am talking at probably 50X plus rate.
and, as is said, police also kill civilians at a far higher rate in the US than in the UK...and that is unarguably a direct result of them carrying guns.
so what i'm saying is when you hear people trying to mock the UK system becuase police are unarmed, which i've seen quite frequently on here. you only need to look at the stats to see which system in reality is working better and by quite some way.
south america is full of 3rd world countries, many with long standing political problems. so comparing them with the US really is comparing apples to oranges. AND it is estimated that hundreds of thousands of US guns illegally cross the border into mexico yearly. so not only is the ridiculous number of guns in circulation having grave consequences on your own society. it is also a major contributor to crime and violence in neighbouring countries too.
Yeah...Must be the guns...not the people using them.
Such a lack of logic.
-
probably read it on one of those braindead right wing type sites
Didn't U talk Paki rubbish about Tommy Robinson 2 ...................
-
yes you can compare different countries. nearly all of countries in the developed world have pretty similar (very low) homicide rate apart from the US which is the big outlier. nearly all of the other countries in the developed world have very strict gun control and very few guns in society, pro rata.
the problem in the US is the number of guns in circulation, which stems from the stupidly lax laws. at this stage it's pretty pointless comparing states because it is so easy for anyone in any state with or without strict gun laws to get a gun. the country is awash with guns.
i did not imply that more police are shot in the US because they carry guns. i asked the question that if guns are such great deterrents (as per the gun nut argument) why are police in the US (that all carry guns), killed at such a higher rate than those in the UK that are unarmed? and i am talking at probably 50X plus rate.
and, as is said, police also kill civilians at a far higher rate in the US than in the UK...and that is unarguably a direct result of them carrying guns.
so what i'm saying is when you hear people trying to mock the UK system becuase police are unarmed, which i've seen quite frequently on here. you only need to look at the stats to see which system in reality is working better and by quite some way.
south america is full of 3rd world countries, many with long standing political problems. so comparing them with the US really is comparing apples to oranges. AND it is estimated that hundreds of thousands of US guns illegally cross the border into mexico yearly. so not only is the ridiculous number of guns in circulation having grave consequences on your own society. it is also a major contributor to crime and violence in neighbouring countries too.
After they pass Brexit and you get deported please don't come to the US. It will be way too dangerous for you. Go back to that nice, peaceful, homeland of yours, Pakistan, where you can reunite with your family and have children with them.
-
Didn't U talk Paki rubbish about Tommy Robinson 2 ...................
Most of what he Talks is Complete & utter Rubbish.
-
Yeah...Must be the guns...not the people using them.
Such a lack of logic.
He says you CAN compare countries and except if it's South America. And the problem with gun crime in South America is because of all the guns in the US. And it is implying that somehow police carrying guns is one of the reasons they get killed at a higher rate. As if they wouldn't get killed if they didn't carry guns.
And it's true more civilians get shot by police in the US compared to the UK. So what? The question is if they deserved to get shot. How many criminals in the UK got away with violent crimes because no one had a gun to shoot them?
It reminds me of some Leftist who told me that one of the many proofs that America is a racist country is that there are more Blacks in prison than in college. As if we didn't put them in jail that they would instead go to college. Same flawed reasoning that cocker uses.
The torrential flow of illogic coming from the inbred Paki is just breathtaking.
-
https://streamable.com/4xx2z
-
He says you CAN compare countries and except if it's South America. And the problem with gun crime in South America is because of all the guns in the US. And it is implying that somehow police carrying guns is one of the reasons they get killed at a higher rate. As if they wouldn't get killed if they didn't carry guns.
And it's true more civilians get shot by police in the US compared to the UK. So what? The question is if they deserved to get shot. How many criminals in the UK got away with violent crimes because no one had a gun to shoot them?
It reminds me of some Leftist who told me that one of the many proofs that America is a racist country is that there are more Blacks in prison than in college. As if we didn't put them in jail that they would instead go to college. Same flawed reasoning that cocker uses.
The torrential flow of illogic coming from the inbred Paki is just breathtaking.
we have something in the UK called "due process of law" ...we prefer to let the courts decide on guilt and then punishment rather than have the police play judge, jury and executioner.
you senile old kunt.
simple question. if guns are such a great deterrent, why do US police get shot and killed at a way higher rate than in the UK where police are unarmed...
"More than 70,000 guns recovered from crime scenes in Mexico between 2009 and 2014 could be traced back to the United States, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. That represents 70 percent of all crime guns recovered and traced in Mexico during that period.
The report underscores the extent to which American firearms are a contributor not just to crime in the United States, but also to violence that happens south of the border. "
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/14/why-mexicos-drug-cartels-love-americas-gun-laws/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.97b4d5115f97
go back to noncing young children, pedolust. something you're actually good at.
-
He says you CAN compare countries and except if it's South America. And the problem with gun crime in South America is because of all the guns in the US. And it is implying that somehow police carrying guns is one of the reasons they get killed at a higher rate. As if they wouldn't get killed if they didn't carry guns.
Could you imagine if cops in inner cities were banned from carrying guns? The entire force would resign en masse.
-
Could you imagine if cops in inner cities were banned from carrying guns? The entire force would resign en masse.
it could never happen in the US. but in the UK statistics show that police do not need guns and when you look at what's going in the US it's a stark warning that isn't a system to aspire to.
-
it could never happen in the US. but in the UK statistics show that police do not need guns and when you look at what's going in the US it's a stark warning that isn't a system to aspire to.
And then they get their CB shoved up their arses because they were never trained in its use because that would be considered insensitive to muslimes. You wouldn't survive a night in a B&W in Chicago or Detroit.
Fuck Your Noise.
-
And then they get their CB shoved up their arses because they were never trained in its use because that would be considered insensitive to muslimes. You wouldn't survive a night in a B&W in Chicago or Detroit.
Fuck Your Noise.
and you would?
you wouldn't survive a meeting with me anywhere on this planet if you got out of line. ;)
and I wouldn't need any gun
-
After they pass Brexit and you get deported please don't come to the US. It will be way too dangerous for you. Go back to that nice, peaceful, homeland of yours, Pakistan, where you can reunite with your family and have children with them.
77 day's until BREXIT ;D
-
and you would?
you wouldn't survive a meeting with me anywhere on this planet if you got out of line. ;)
and I wouldn't need any gun
;D ;D
-
77 day's until BREXIT ;D
HUZZAH!!
-
it could never happen in the US. but in the UK statistics show that police do not need guns and when you look at what's going in the US it's a stark warning that isn't a system to aspire to.
Why would America aspire to be like Europe? Where are the European equivalents of these companies?
Apple
Amazon
Uber
Netflix
Facebook
Google
Home Depot
Airbnb
Microsoft
UFC
The great European companies are almost all over 100 years. Europe is obviously a stagnant place devoid of of entrepreneurial spirit.
Ironically, The only reason you dont have similar innovation in other industries is because theyre too much like Europe, heavily government regulated and intervened.
-
Why so little murder rate in Japan?
Less Negroids and Mussies.
like Always..
(https://i.redd.it/hz0n1mrr9b421.jpg)
spot the common denominator...
-
and you would?
you wouldn't survive a meeting with me anywhere on this planet if you got out of line. ;)
and I wouldn't need any gun
What are you going to do? Pose in a thong?
-
Dreams crushed... :'(
Maybe Muslims just don't like Japan. I wonder what it is that discourages them from invading and destroying that nation? Maybe it's all the raw fish and that they pixel out the cawks and vag in porn.
+ NO goats in Nippon :D
-
What are you going to do? Pose in a thong?
whatever it takes bae :-*
-
and you would?
you wouldn't survive a meeting with me anywhere on this planet if you got out of line. ;)
and I wouldn't need any gun
BS, U have no coins to travel, cheap Bulgarian holiday tells all about U.
-
BS, U have no coins to travel, cheap Bulgarian holiday tells all about U.
you've dedicated your entire existence on this board to following me around. lol. I literally own you ;D
-
you've dedicated your entire existence on this board to following me around. lol. I literally own you ;D
O, Tommy , Tommy, Tommy Robinson ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;D
-
O, Tommy , Tommy, Tommy Robinson ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;D
LOL! Gets him every time.
-
(https://img-cdn.brainberries.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/17-Selfies-That-Went-To-The-EXTREME-12.jpg)
-
LOL! Gets him every time.
;D ;D ;D