-
Not gonna lie - being impeached twice is badass
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
https://mobile.twitter.com/raheemkassam/status/1349503623122849793?s=10
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
-
That's when you know the swap really wants you out.
-
You are canceled
-
That's when you know you really are in over your head.
First time was trying to get a foreign power to publicly announce they were investigating the guy who later kicked his ass in an election, by holding a congressionally approved payment up. For the sake of time, we'll forget the 13 allegations of Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller report.
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
Gotta say, if you support Trump at this point, you might just be Russian
-
That's when you know you really are in over your head.
First time was trying to get a foreign power to publicly announce they were investigating the guy who later kicked his ass in an election, by holding a congressionally approved payment up. For the sake of time, we'll forget the 13 allegations of Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller report.
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
Gotta say, if you support Trump at this point, you might just be Russian
I missed Trump's inciting the capitol riot. I was responding to Getbig PM's.
Can you post the part where Trump incited the riot on here? Curious why he would do such a thing.
-
...
Specifically, what did Trump say? ???
Just curious. You'd think impeaching someone with days left in office is somewhat desperate. What, with the landslide victory by The Duke of Dementia, and all that. I know if Trump had won and beat out a sitting Democrat president, I wouldn't be worrying remotely what happens in basically a week's time.
So what did he say that resulted in this impeachment?
-
That's when you know you really are in over your head.
First time was trying to get a foreign power to publicly announce they were investigating the guy who later kicked his ass in an election, by holding a congressionally approved payment up. For the sake of time, we'll forget the 13 allegations of Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller report.
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
Gotta say, if you support Trump at this point, you might just be Russian
Or Autistic.
-
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
I asked to post the part of what Trump said where he incited a riot, not your interpretation of what he said.
Quote specifically what he said please.
-
They are scared of him running again for president, liars can`t pull a fraud twice in that manner...
-
That's when you know you really are in over your head.
First time was trying to get a foreign power to publicly announce they were investigating the guy who later kicked his ass in an election, by holding a congressionally approved payment up. For the sake of time, we'll forget the 13 allegations of Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller report.
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
Gotta say, if you support Trump at this point, you might just be Russian
Russian? Lmao. Youre pathetic.
-
I asked to post the part of what Trump said where he incited a riot, not your interpretation of what he said.
Quote specifically what he said please.
Dont bother debating with that loser. Trump could say, "I love America." and they hear some type of racist dogwhistle or whatever these morons call it, anything other than what it actually was.
I don't think trump should be the center point here and I dont think he was as effective as some people give him credit for but all this nonsense about wanting to start a civil war and nuclear code, fear based nonsense, as well as Russia lunacy is next level fucking stupid and people like Agnostic007, straw,etc.. shouldn't be given more then a f-off, when they say something so false. They clearly didn't bother to spend a minute to investigate what was said in its entirty and full context. Theres people like this on the right as well though and they don't help.
The left has always shown its true colors. They are censorship ship happy. Always have been remember the PMRC? Lol even music was evil and needed to be stopped.
-
I asked to post the part of what Trump said where he incited a riot, not your interpretation of what he said.
Quote specifically what he said please.
This might help:
-
This might help:
No it doesn't.
-
Dont bother debating with that loser. Trump could say, "I love America." and they hear some type of racist dogwhistle or whatever these morons call it other than what it actually was.
I don't think trump should be the center point here and I dont think he was as effective as some people give him credit for but all this nonsense about wanting to start a civil war and nuclear code fear based nonsense as well as Russia lunacy is next level fucking stupid and people like Agnostic007, straw,etc.. shouldn't be given more then a f-off, when they say some so false.
The left has always shown its true colors. They are censorship ship happy. Always have been remember the PMRC? Lol even music was evil and needed to be stopped.
Tell me about it. I'm asking AbrahamG to specifically state what Trump said that would legally be classified as an incitement to riot, and instead, he comes back with vague rhetoric about Trump making comments AbrahamG alleges to be false, which apparently constitutes "inciting a riot" [I had no idea that making a false statement is somehow construed as being "incitement" now - and I'm not saying I even think what Trump was false, I'm saying that even if it WAS false, what difference does that make? How does making a statement that is false constitute inciting a riot?]. Anyway, here is a portion of the body of Trump's speech which I expected a Getbig leftist to post. Of course, my request was evaded with more vague rhetoric. But what do you expect of leftists?
HERE is the portion of Trump's speech I was expecting to get. I had heard it here and there online, but I requested the full body [either video/audio, or in writing would been sufficient]:
Trump: Our brightest days are before us. Our greatest achievements still wait. I think one of our great achievements will be election security because nobody, until I came along, had any idea how corrupt our elections were. And again, most people would stand there at 9 o’clock in the evening and say, “I want to thank you very much,” and they go off to some other life. But I said something is wrong here, something is really wrong, can’t have happened, and we fight. We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.
Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children and for our beloved country, and I say this, despite all that has happened, the best is yet to come.
So we are going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue — I love Pennsylvania Avenue — and we are going to the Capitol. And we are going to try and give — the Democrats are hopeless, they are never voting for anything, not even one vote — but we are going to try to give our Republicans — the weak ones because the strong ones don’t need any of our help — we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country. So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.
I want to thank you all. God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here. This is incredible.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
^ So somehow using the term "fight" and asking people to walk to the Capitol is an "incitement to riot"?
So to be clear here, left-wing Getbiggers do not believe in the First Amendment?:
First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I LOL'd at this part:
Trump: Media will not show the magnitude of this crowd. Even I, when I turned on today, I looked, and I saw thousands of people here, but you don’t see hundreds of thousands of people behind you because they don’t want to show that. We have hundreds of thousands of people here, and I just want them to be recognized by the fake news media. Turn your cameras, please, and show what is really happening out here because these people are not going to take it any longer. They’re not going to take it any longer.
Go ahead, turn your cameras, please. Would you show they came from all over the world actually, but they came from all over our country. I just really want to see what they do. I just want to see how they cover it. I’ve never seen anything like it, but it would be really great if we could be covered fairly by the media. The media is the biggest problem we have as far as I’m concerned, single biggest problem.
I saw the video portion of this, and the cameraman didn't turn around, LOL. How can you POSSIBLY live, knowing you are just a paid shill? If I was asked to turn the camera around on one of Joe Biden's rallies with 1,000 people, I WOULD TURN IT AROUND. Leftists are so terrified of the truth, it's hilarious. Hence the current desperation in removing Trump. No one would be THAT desperate to remove a man for simply stating that the establishment is corrupt if they didn't know how much of the public is on the same page.
Here is the type of video analysis I was expecting one of Getbig's leftists to post - SURPRISE, SURPRISE, they didn't post it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WmJIw1a06Tzs
Speaking of "incitement to riot" - what to leftist Getbiggers think of this?:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NLDnyFAbhz48
::)
So in this thread, today I learned [ITT, TIL]:
Democrats explicitly making terrorist threats and direct incitements to riot is NOT incitement, but Trump [or presumably, anyone who isn't a batshit insane social justice leftist] merely calling for a peaceful protest - a walk - to "fight" is somehow an incitement to riot? ::)
In what world do these people even live in?
It's complete Trump Derangement Syndrome. In the case of some people, it's extremely low IQ - but what about AbrahamG? Is he also not smart enough to understand this...or is he just lying, or...? I'm just trying to understand these people.
-
No it doesn't.
Yes it does retard.
-
Yes it does retard.
Fuck off.
-
Next stop on leftie agenda: fight against the constitution on all fronts...
-
This might help:
Nice ratio. Even liberals and leftists are getting annoyed by liberal media. Canada is a bit ahead in the batshit insane liberalism as official policy department, so you really need to check the ratios on videos about COVID by CTV, CBC, Global News, etc. ;D
I got to just over five minutes in, and stopped watching that video. Around the three minute mark, he is encouraging his supporters to walk to the Capitol...no judge would consider encouraging a walk to be an incitement to riot. It's not Trump's responsibility what people do. He clearly called for a peaceful demonstration, protected by the first amendment.
I was going to watch the full video, but if any inciting statement was present, it would have been shown by the five minute mark, so I stopped.
And I will ask you and other Getbig leftists YET AGAIN, what did Trump say, in his EXACT WORDS, to incite a riot? I'm not asking you to tell me what some Trump supporters/demonstrators did - I'm asking you to quote where Trump called for any illegal activity.
Post it. Now.
-
Nice ratio. Even liberals and leftists are getting annoyed by that. Canada is a bit ahead in the batshit insane liberalism as official policy department, so you really need to check the ratios on videos about COVID by CTV, CBC, Global News, etc. ;D
I got to just over five minutes in, and stopped watching that video. Around the three minute mark, he is encouraging his supporters to walk to the Capitol...no judge would consider encouraging a walk to be an incitement to riot. It's not Trump's responsibility what people do. He clearly called for a peaceful demonstration, protected by the first amendment.
I was going to watch the full video, but if any inciting statement was present, it would have been shown by the five minute mark, so I stopped.
And I will ask you and other Getbig leftists YET AGAIN, what did Trump say, in his EXACT WORDS, to incite a riot? I'm not asking you to tell me what some Trump supporters/demonstrators did - I'm asking you to quote where Trump called for any illegal activity.
Post it. Now.
Stop Matt. you're inciting violence with your post. The tolerant leftist on here will call for your imprisonment now.
"Racist" is losing its charm so now word is "violence".
-
Yes it does retard.
Above, I stated portions of Trump's speech - the part that I assume to be what you are calling an incitement to riot.
I want you to EXPLCITLY state IN TRUMP'S WORDS, what he said that is an incitement to violence. Presumably, a portion of his speech where he stated to storm the Capitol building, cause property damage, cause physical harm to someone - anything like that.
QUOTE specifically, in text, or post a video/audio clip, of the portion of what Trump said that, in your opinion, is considered incitement to riot.
-
This is ok. But if Trump said it, its inciting violence. lol
Maybe if the GOP Rep called the President a mother fucker instead of a liar it would be acceptable.
https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-are-defending-democracy-threats-burn-down-system-1533828
Democrats Are 'Defending Democracy' With Threats to Burn Down the System
Daily Beast and CNN contributor Reza Aslan tweeted, "If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire f***ing thing down."
Aslan was not alone. Writers Guild of America president Beau Willimon said, "We're shutting the country down" if Trump and McConnell move to confirm a nominee. Washington Post writer Laura Bassett said a nomination would mean "there will be riots."
Democratic politicians weren't much more subtle about their plans. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said McConnell was "playing with fire." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said his party would "use every tool at our disposal" to stop a confirmation. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spoke of having "arrows in our quiver" to keep the seat open.
All acceptable here.
Eeven going after fellow "progressives" if they dont like what they hear. Differing opinion and holding politicians accountable is violence.
AOC accuses Jimmy Dore of "violent speech"
Just going by your rules and standards, libtards.
-
In Trumps case, lies and manipulation of deceivers being pushed by media and big tech companies becomes reality of all a sudden.
Best is, they put themselves on some imaginary moral pedestal and point their finger at the president, accusing him of inciting violence through words and saying he is responsible for the aforementioned untruths.
Commie tactics are always the same, personal discreditation, destroy, steal the property of the accused and in end, physical elimination.
-
That's when you know the swap really wants you out.
The Squad? :D
-
Stop Matt. you're inciting violence with your post. The tolerant leftist on here will call for your imprisonment now.
Racist is losing its charm so now everything is violence.
Apparently Trump saying that people should fight for their rights, and asking his supporters to walk to the Capitol building is an incitement to riot. I missed the part in the first amendment THAT SAYS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT ACTUALLY SAYS.
I can't believe how much intellectual energy I spend on these morons. On the flip side, it REALLY raises my game as far as being able to be good at debating.
So Donald Trump asking people to fight for their rights = illegal.
While Nancy Pelosi openly using the term "civil unrest" in a speech = legal.
On that note, and not being a batshit insane leftist, I suspect even using the term "civil unrest" is probably legal.
Even Madonna saying whatever she said, I think something like "I have thought about bombing the White House", is probably legal. I mean - it's legal to THINK these things. Had she said "Everyone should go out and [commit illegal act]", that would be another story. But she didn't say that.
I'm just happy that the right-wing has all of the guns. Stupid lefties with their gun control bollocks over the years, hahaha - what do these jagoffs think is going to happen if the SHTF? What are they going to fight right-wingers with? Spoons? Flipping tools.
-
Apparently Trump saying that people should fight for their rights, and asking his supporters to walk to the Capitol building is an incitement to riot. I missed the part in the first amendment THAT SAYS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT ACTUALLY SAYS.
I can't believe how much intellectual energy I spend on these morons. On the flip side, it REALLY raises my game as far as being able to be good at debating.
So Donald Trump asking people to fight for their rights = illegal.
While Nancy Pelosi openly using the term "civil unrest" in a speech = legal.
On that note, and not being a batshit insane leftist, I suspect even using the term "civil unrest" is probably legal.
Even Madonna saying whatever she said, I think something like "I have thought about bombing the White House", is probably legal. I mean - it's legal to THINK these things. Had she said "Everyone should go out and [commit illegal act]", that would be another story. But she didn't say that.
I'm just happy that the right-wing has all of the guns. Stupid lefties with their gun control bollocks over the years, hahaha - what do these jagoffs think is going to happen if the SHTF? What are they going to fight right-wingers with? Spoons? Flipping tools.
This.
Im just using their, (agnostic007) tactics and "logic" but I really dont care what the people in any of the above examples I posted have said. I really dont. Just pointing out hypocrisy. It happenes on the right too but they left is out of control with this behavior.
-
Next stop on leftie agenda: fight against the constitution on all fronts...
Along with legalized pedophilia.
-
This.
Im just using their tactics but I really dont care what the people in any of the above examples I posted have said. I really dont. Just pointing out hypocrisy. It happened on the right too but its not even close as to how often the accusations happen nor with as much glee.
Exactly. I would even say that some of the comments, on both sides, is legal speech. If I recall correctly [this was years ago], Madonna said something like "I have thought about bringing a bomb to the White House". I know leftists are too moronic to grasp nuance, but technically speaking, she could be referring to a pre-detonated bomb that she bought in a private sale from a WWI museum or something.
I don't know the exact laws, but it wouldn't surprise me if owning a rusted century-old antique bomb that has already exploded, or is otherwise unusable, is legal. And stating you are going to bring a legal object somewhere is probably legally protected speech.
As I said, I don't expect leftists to understand this, but even IF their statements are true, it wouldn't take long doing a tally to figure out that Democrats have made WAY more statements like this than Republicans have.
Just look at what the Schmayor of Portland did - Trump offered federal assistance in response to the 100+ days of property destruction, looting, and arson civil disobedience, and THIS is how the prick responds:
https://twitter.com/tedwheeler/status/1299433988600156160
::)
Just count the property damage by Democrats and by Republicans and make a strict comparison. I'm sorry, but how on earth can anyone even claim the right-wing is causing the most damage right now?
I remember the only election in my life that mattered to me was Bush II. And for good reason - he started a war based on BLATANT, DISGUSTING, AND OBVIOUS LIES. Does it really take a genius to figure out that if Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction THAT HE WOULD HAVE USED THEM ON THE FIRST DAY OF BEING INVADED BY THE MOST POWERFUL MILITARY FORCE IN HUMAN HISTORY? ::)
That was a point in time where I would have never labelled myself as a conservative or right-winger in any way. Additionally, lack of stem cell research was considered to be caused by the religious right in the USA, so it was a bit embarrassing to be associated with anything right-wing.
Now with BLM and batshit insane SJW's, and every other leftist loon out there, I could NEVER call myself leftist. Even on things like drugs and prostitution, areas where I am libertarian, I find it difficult to make comments that will even REMOTELY get me associated with the left. The far-far left has just gone so completely insane, that I don't know how a normal person can call themselves a liberal.
I mean, how the f*ck can someone be supportive of 100+ days of rioting in Portland? And WHAT are these people even rioting? The right to shoot loaded guns at police officers and survive the interaction?
I have NO IDEA what these people even want. I just assume they are spiteful mutants, who presumably just hate existence itself.
Life ain't easy. Every time I check out Britney Spears' updates on Instagram, I realize how life is almost a cosmic tragedy of sorts. Maybe that's what it's about. Otherwise, I really have no idea. All they ever do is demand privileges in the name of "rights" and destroy property.
I no longer pretend that any left-winger is going to tell me, in clear terms, exactly what it is they support.
-
Tell me about it. I'm asking AbrahamG to specifically state what Trump said that would legally be classified as an incitement to riot, and instead, he comes back with vague rhetoric about Trump making comments AbrahamG alleges to be false, which apparently constitutes "inciting a riot" [I had no idea that making a false statement is somehow construed as being "incitement" now - and I'm not saying I even think what Trump was false, I'm saying that even if it WAS false, what difference does that make? How does making a statement that is false constitute inciting a riot?]. Anyway, here is a portion of the body of Trump's speech which I expected a Getbig leftist to post. Of course, my request was evaded with more vague rhetoric. But what do you expect of leftists?
HERE is the portion of Trump's speech I was expecting to get. I had heard it here and there online, but I requested the full body [either video/audio, or in writing would been sufficient]:
^ So somehow using the term "fight" and asking people to walk to the Capitol is an "incitement to riot"?
So to be clear here, left-wing Getbiggers do not believe in the First Amendment?:
I LOL'd at this part:
I saw the video portion of this, and the cameraman didn't turn around, LOL. How can you POSSIBLY live, knowing you are just a paid shill? If I was asked to turn the camera around on one of Joe Biden's rallies with 1,000 people, I WOULD TURN IT AROUND. Leftists are so terrified of the truth, it's hilarious. Hence the current desperation in removing Trump. No one would be THAT desperate to remove a man for simply stating that the establishment is corrupt if they didn't know how much of the public is on the same page.
Here is the type of video analysis I was expecting one of Getbig's leftists to post - SURPRISE, SURPRISE, they didn't post it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WmJIw1a06Tzs
Speaking of "incitement to riot" - what to leftist Getbiggers think of this?:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NLDnyFAbhz48
::)
So in this thread, today I learned [ITT, TIL]:
Democrats explicitly making terrorist threats and direct incitements to riot is NOT incitement, but Trump [or presumably, anyone who isn't a batshit insane social justice leftist] merely calling for a peaceful protest - a walk - to "fight" is somehow an incitement to riot? ::)
In what world do these people even live in?
It's complete Trump Derangement Syndrome. In the case of some people, it's extremely low IQ - but what about AbrahamG? Is he also not smart enough to understand this...or is he just lying, or...? I'm just trying to understand these people.
(https://media.tenor.com/images/0b6584bd4c8d717d55aebab0ae16f1fb/tenor.gif)
-
(https://media.tenor.com/images/0b6584bd4c8d717d55aebab0ae16f1fb/tenor.gif)
That's a post I can agree with! ;D
wes - where in this tweet below do you see anything about "White Supremacists"?
Does it make me a White Supremacist if I wear an American flag tanktop? ???
https://twitter.com/CUPCAKEWILLIAM6/status/1300120160800571392
-
her exact quote was
“Yes, I’m angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” Madonna said. “But I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair.”
I cant stand the bitch but I still knew what she was trying to say. I didnt get all bent outta shape and ask that she get arrested for inciting violence. lol
Too much of this is going on. Its lame.
-
her exact quote was
“Yes, I’m angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” Madonna said. “But I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair.”
I cant stand the bitch but I still knew what she was trying to say. I didnt get all bent outta shape and ask that she get arrested for inciting violence. lol
Too much of this is going on. Its lame.
LOL!!! Wow...that was similar to what I remembered. At first I thought she said "bombing the White House" [page one of this thread]. But then I thought "Nah...she must have said "I've thought about bringing a bomb to the White House".", because that doesn't technically denote a crime.
But I guess the truth was in between my two guesses...she did technically say she wanted to blow up the White House - but she did not use the word "bomb". Even had she said "I have thought about bombing the White House"...well...in the USA, that speech, as far as I am aware, is legal.
Had she said "I want each and every one of you to learn how to acquire or build a bomb, and bring it to a federal building and [I'm sure you see where I'm going here]", THAT would be illegal, as it would be direct incitement.
To simply say "I have thought about the world blowing up" is NOT ILLEGAL.
Left-wingers are so utterly brainwashed by social justice that they think "hurt feelings" is illegal, these sacks of shit.
My issue wit the university is that I mentioned on here before is that they threatened to sue me as my status on Facebook still said I was an employee of the university [because Facebook CONSTANTLY changes how to change anything, and I just went to change it one day, and it wasn't the same place as it was before, and I just didn't think anything about it]. I went to tell the university administration that I changed my status and that I didn't want any further threatening letters sent to me, and they expelled me, stating that "Canning's eyes were dating around". Uh...excuse me? ??? I didn't realize that my eyes shifting in my head was a crime. ::)
We'll just ignore the bit about university security physically assaulting me in the process of all this too. ::)
This is what happens when we raise generations of pussies who seem to think it's ok to literally encourage or commit complete violence against people depending on what group they are a part of [White people, males, right-wingers...in recent times, Asians are being discriminated against in the USA too, RE: Ivy League lawsuits, where Asians needed 1600 SAT scores to get the same admission seat that a Black American only needed a 1350 SAT score to get]. Meanwhile, if you are a certain group, it is ILLEGAL to even defend yourself. An example is in Thunder Bay, where a White female police officer was called in to deal with a belligerent Indigenous person. The Indigenous female repeatedly spat on the White female police officer who finally slapped her.
There was an outrage in the press, and it was later reported that the police officer was "charged" for slapping her. In reality, she was NOT charged - no Crown Attorney would touch the case, because the video evidence was clear, which was that the Indigenous female ASSAULTED the police officer, and the police officer acted in self-defense. In reality, the 21-year-old Indigenous woman should have been charged.
But instead, the White female police officer was "charged" under the bullshit Police Services Act.
It's clearly gotten to the point where more or less, out of four White people, at least one will know this is where things are going, and that's why we're starting to see a reversal of this horseshit [hence more Trumps will be elected, and if that doesn't work...well...this may now be the time to remind left-wingers that all the evil stuff they say about White men and White people is TRUE].
Just to think of the morons in this thread, who actually think that Trump saying that people should "fight" is considered incitement. Could you IMAGINE how these morons would feel if they posted on Facebook "Go out to vote today" [even as Democrats], but that the result was that Republicans won, and the next day, they found themselves fired from their job for having encouraged people to vote because, in hindsight, the suggestion ultimately resulted in a Republican victory?
Seriously, could you IMAGINE? They would be the first to say that's bullshit!
These idiots only feel the way they do because they are in power. It's shocking how unprincipled they were.
I would have still been marginally annoyed if Democrats won the presidency, knowing that they are only still getting any victories at all because they keep importing more non-Whites to vote Democrat...but this election wasn't even remotely fair and free, as far as I can tell. THAT is what bothers me. If you gave me ample proof of a Republican win being rigged, I would be bothered by it. It seems like the Democrats in general [or at least the ones here on Getbig] don't care how they win at all.
Except the day that this stuff impacts them...I'd be curious what they say then.
-
So Getbig leftists think telling people to fight for their rights is incitement to violence? ???
Better watch it the next time you discuss the civil rights movement to a group of more than six people.
-
See what you idiots started?
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene vows to IMPEACH Biden on his first day in office, says she’ll be ‘voice of ignored voters’
-
See what you idiots started?
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene vows to IMPEACH Biden on his first day in office, says she’ll be ‘voice of ignored voters’
awesome. dog those fuckers like they dogged Trump since his day one. nothing else mattered to them, nothing.
-
See what you idiots started?
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene vows to IMPEACH Biden on his first day in office, says she’ll be ‘voice of ignored voters’
Fine. The new norm is to attempt to oust the POTUS the entire time he is in office. Just like ending the filibuster this impeachment nonsense will backfire.
&index=14
-
Fine. The new norm is to attempt to oust the POTUS the entire time he is in office. Just like ending the filibuster this impeachment nonsense will backfire.
&index=14
When I was growing up and being taught to "not be racist", I couldn't help to notice some of the same POS teachers who wanted young White Canadian children to "end hate" had their own hate-on for White Americans.
I noticed the hypocrisy immediately with these pricks.
So I bought that CD from a friend who was like that, to derive him the pleasure of listening to it, LOL. Good song though. I didn't recall hearing them much in the years to follow though.
-
it would seem to be obligatory, especially for a philosopher, to sacrifice even one's closest personal ties in defense of the truth. Both are dear to us, yet 'tis our duty to prefer the truth.” I am astonished at those who don’t feel the same way and only believe what makes them feel good or supports their delusions. ;D
-
That's when you know you really are in over your head.
First time was trying to get a foreign power to publicly announce they were investigating the guy who later kicked his ass in an election, by holding a congressionally approved payment up. For the sake of time, we'll forget the 13 allegations of Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller report.
The Second was when he incited a riot at the capitol by continuing to falsely claim in spite of the Supreme court, state supreme court, state courts, appellate courts, Election officials, saying otherwise, that the election was rigged.
Gotta say, if you support Trump at this point, you might just be Russian
so what is kamala guilty of for setting up fundraisers to bail out people that contributed to 2 billion dollars in property damage?
gotta say if you support biden/harris, you might be a communist traitor to america
E
-
When I was growing up and being taught to "not be racist", I couldn't help to notice some of the same POS teachers who wanted young White Canadian children to "end hate" had their own hate-on for White Americans.
I noticed the hypocrisy immediately with these pricks.
So I bought that CD from a friend who was like that, to derive him the pleasure of listening to it, LOL. Good song though. I didn't recall hearing them much in the years to follow though.
Haha were these teachers darkies or just those stupid white guilt cunts
I remember being in first school when we were told we had to now call the black board a chalk board and the nursery rhyme ‘baa baa black sheep’ was banned despite the school being 100% white
-
Haha were these teachers darkies or just those stupid white guilt cunts
I remember being in first school when we were told we had to now call the black board a chalk board and the nursery rhyme ‘baa baa black sheep’ was banned despite the school being 100% white
Haha, neither would group bashing White Americans would have been acceptable to me, but we only had one Black teacher at the school who came from Haiti. For some reason, he studied in the USA, but ultimately settled in Canada. Imagine coming from a dump like Haiti, and then migrant shopping until you get to Canada. Like WTF problem did he have in the USA? Probably too many Black people, lmao.
The teachers who taught this sort of rhetoric [in hindsight, only one I remember with certainty, but maybe a second or third one] annoyed me because we we clearly being taught at a young age that hating people based on group membership is wrong, AND THEN THEY WOULD GO ON HATING WHITE PEOPLE [specifically Americans, in the one prominent case I still distinctly remember].
I can't even tell you how annoying this was. I felt like hipolita meija was shitting in my brain. And you could still smell it from the Greater Columbus Convention Center. ;D
Sounds to me like you attending an even more batshit insane leftist school / school with more batshit insane leftist teachers.
-
Just think how much more of a badass the FAT ORANGE TRAITOR will be when he's sitting in jail (for ...tax fraud, insurance fraud, money laundering, ...and who knows what else)
-
KING OF BADASSES!
(https://i.ibb.co/M5gdZLj/Trumpe.png)
-
Just think how much more of a badass the FAT ORANGE TRAITOR will be when he's sitting in jail (for ...tax fraud, insurance fraud, money laundering, ...and who knows what else)
unhinged or what ? seek help.
-
Just think how much more of a badass the FAT ORANGE TRAITOR will be when he's sitting in jail (for ...tax fraud, insurance fraud, money laundering, ...and who knows what else)
you have your head so far up your ass.... he wont do a fuckin day in jail... keep dreaming... better yet, find a fuckin job pussy..
-
you have your head so far up your ass.... he wont do a fuckin day in jail... keep dreaming... better yet, find a fuckin job pussy..
^hillbilly meltdown^
-
KING OF BADASSES!
(https://i.ibb.co/M5gdZLj/Trumpe.png)
nice neck vagina right there.
-
.
-
.
Get help. Youre obsessing
-
They are very silent once they were shown the “ proof”
Silly girls act silly
-
Get help. Youre obsessing
Whining over humor is truly an indication of obsessing. Suggesting it for others is a sign of projection.
Carry on Trumpturd.
-
Whining over humor is truly an indication of obsessing. Suggesting it for others is a sign of projection.
Carry on Trumpturd.
🐑 🐑 Lurker... 🐑 🐑 No... 🐑 🐑 🐑 🐑 More.... 🐑 🐑🐑🐑 🐑
-
Both times for absolutely nothing. Nothing in that phone call to the Ukraine while proof positive of corruption with Biden and family. The second time again there was nothing in that speech that spoke of violence.
-
🐑 🐑 Lurker... 🐑 🐑 No... 🐑 🐑 🐑 🐑 More.... 🐑 🐑🐑🐑 🐑
^^^ Another Trumpturd whinebag.
You still standing by your predictions that Biden will never be President? :D
-
^^^ Another Trumpturd whinebag.
You still standing by your predictions that Biden will never be President? :D
🐑 🐑 🐑
-
Whinebag.
-
LurkerNoMore family reunion
-
A trumpturd talking about sheep. ::) Tell us more how Biden won't be President. Three days left.... what ya gonna do? Besides whine?
-
200 in us dollars or turkish lira?
-
-
Still no good story how Biden won’t be POTUS? Are you saving it for Wednesday?
-
Still no good story how Biden won’t be POTUS? Are you saving it for Wednesday?
still no facts about the positive things biden has done in 47 years as a politician from you? are you saving it for...????
are you excited for communism? why do you want communism? why do i get the feeling you will have to google "communism"? ::)
E
-
still no facts about the positive things biden has done in 47 years as a politician from you? are you saving it for...????
are you excited for communism? why do you want communism? why do i get the feeling you will have to google "communism"? ::)
E
They don't really care....their loyalty has a price just like their "leader" creepy Joe. At least Joe and his family got filthy rich for selling out.
For a few thousand dollars in the mail most leftists are fine with locking down all small enterprise and selling the country to China.
SAD!
-
still no facts about the positive things biden has done in 47 years as a politician from you? are you saving it for...????
are you excited for communism? why do you want communism? why do i get the feeling you will have to google "communism"? ::)
E
Already listed you dumbass. Try again.
-
Already listed you dumbass. Try again.
🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑
-
🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑🇨🇳🐑
^^ Desperate. 50 more hours!
-
^^ Desperate. 50 more hours!
yup 50 more hours.... and we will truly see who is suffering from stage 5 terminal TDS.... lmao, i cant wait to see the stupid shit you libtards post.... threads like "Trump golfs 5 days in a row",, or " the traitors neighbors hate him".... or itll be straight commie shit like, "Trump needs to go to prison for _______".
-
yup 50 more hours.... and we will truly see who is suffering from stage 5 terminal TDS.... lmao, i cant wait to see the stupid shit you libtards post.... threads like "Trump golfs 5 days in a row",, or " the traitors neighbors hate him".... or itll be straight commie shit like, "Trump needs to go to prison for _______".
The fact you think he will still be relevant says a lot about your mindset. I'm sure we will all have a good chuckle over his upcoming troubles.
Not as many chuckles as we will have over the tears the Trumpturds are shedding or the delusions they are trying to pass off though.
-
Trump will always be relevant
-
Trump will always be relevant
Only for morons.
-
Who gave the order for all these military to be deployed to DC to protect the "virtual" inauguration?
Trump?
Is it online somewhere stating whom gave this order?
-
The fact you think he will still be relevant says a lot about your mindset. I'm sure we will all have a good chuckle over his upcoming troubles.
Not as many chuckles as we will have over the tears the Trumpturds are shedding or the delusions they are trying to pass off though.
where did say i think that he will still be relevant lib? the fact that you just admitted youll be all over his "upcoming troubles" just proves who he will be "relevant" too...typical libcuck....., all ya gotta do is let them keep talking! lol... you simple fuck.
-
where did say i think that he will still be relevant lib? the fact that you just admitted youll be all over his "upcoming troubles" just proves you know im right...typical libcuck....., all ya gotta do is let them keep talking! lol... you simple fuck.
Says the little bitch still whining over his loss when he isn’t whining over Biden.
-
Says the little bitch still whining over his loss when he isn’t whining over Biden.
find one of my posts where im whining about anything son.... let alone trumps loss or sleepy joe..., go prove your how simple you are to someone else now... youve made your point to me already...
-
find one of my posts where im whining about anything son.... let alone trumps loss or sleepy joe..., go prove your how simple you are to someone else now... youve made your point to me already...
^^ Perfect example. Libtard induced meltdown.
-
^^ Perfect example. Libtard induced meltdown.
not even close .. but there will some good ones coming from trump people.. these far right guys are just as fucked as the leftists..
-
Only for morons.
You must no go outside much
If you frequented the places I do with a ugly negative attitude like the one you display here
You would be promptly removed
But probably not because you couldn’t afford to go in
-
Bring on the liberal freak show! It's gonna be a peverted mess!!
-
"When they go low, we go high."
-
You must no go outside much
If you frequented the places I do with a ugly negative attitude like the one you display here
You would be promptly removed
But probably not because you couldn’t afford to go in
Why would I care to to frequent some place with the likes of you?
You just worry about what excuse you will be making very shortly on why you can't pay your wager on that losing bet.
-
"When they go low, we go high."
Meaningless words when you are known to do the exact opposite.
-
$200
-
200?
i wanted 1k
then your fellow welfare case and fake cop homie agnostic wanted 200
after offering thousands to anyone who he could
and xoxo offered 10-1 on my 1k he wanted 10k
but nothing happened
dont worry "if" there is a inauguration on the 20th ill pay the 200
you willing to jump in too? 200? right here and now? your so sure right?
-
200?
i wanted 1k
then your fellow welfare case and fake cop homie agnostic wanted 200
after offering thousands to anyone who he could
and xoxo offered 10-1 on my 1k he wanted 10k
but nothing happened
dont worry "if" there is a inauguration on the 20th ill pay the 200
you willing to jump in too? 200? right here and now? your so sure right?
inauguration is virtual.. and probably already was recorded so Biden doesn't fumble his words...lol
sportsbooks already paid out
-
virtual is not real its emulation
ill pay anyway if it does happen
funny thing though
is agnostic the fake cop wont accept it because he is to afraid for me to know his info to send it
i however am not
so go on and own yourself some more
Virtual definition is - being such in essence or effect though not formally recognized or admitted.- websters