Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gmflex on October 07, 2022, 10:09:25 AM
-
;D. ;D
US buys $290 million in anti-radiation drugs amid Putin’s nuke threats
https://nypost.com/2022/10/07/us-buys-290m-in-anti-radiation-drugs-amid-nuke-fears/ (https://nypost.com/2022/10/07/us-buys-290m-in-anti-radiation-drugs-amid-nuke-fears/)
https://www.tmz.com/2022/10/07/joe-biden-warns-nuclear-war-vladimir-putin-ukraine-russia/ (https://www.tmz.com/2022/10/07/joe-biden-warns-nuclear-war-vladimir-putin-ukraine-russia/)
;D. ;D
-
Libturds hate Putin, yet cheer on the Ukraine Nazi party, then calling Trumpers "Nazi's".
Dumbest folks in existence... (And calling a red ball-cap a "hate symbol" that cheers on our country to be great) MAGA.
Really brain-dead libturd individuals and cult... ::)
-
Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is going to have a real bad day. Get it?
-
I'm not worried he's not going to destroy his property.
-
I'm not worried he's not going to destroy his property.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/07/27/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-putin/
-
Let’s get the party started!
-
Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is going to have a real bad day. Get it?
;D
Does anyone know how the covid vaccine will interact with nuclear exposure? Will the vaccine increase the risk for death?
-
Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is going to have a real bad day. Get it?
-
Let’s get the party started!
fuck yea then those 87,000 armed irs agents will be worthless
-
doing all they can to start WWIII so they can postpone US elections indefinitely
-
This wouldn’t have even been a thought under Trump
-
Oh from what he has left over from the Cold War? As everyone can see, his military isn't that great. I would not be surprised if he pushed "the button" and it just dropped confetti down from the ceiling.
-
Oh from what he has left over from the Cold War? As everyone can see, his military isn't that great. I would not be surprised if he pushed "the button" and it just dropped confetti down from the ceiling.
Hahaha, right.
-
This wouldn’t have even been a thought under Trump
Ummmmm
This war was planned by Russia when Trump was president.
He was too busy calling Putin a “genius” to notice though.
🙄
-
Ummmmm
This war was planned by Russia when Trump was president.
He was too busy calling Putin a “genius” to notice though.
🙄
bullshit..... another delusional lib..
-
Ummmmm
This war was planned by Russia when Trump was president.
He was too busy calling Putin a “genius” to notice though.
🙄
Planned, but executed under bitem because he knew bitem was a pussy and wouldn't do shit about it.
-
Putin would have to be a brain dead delusional little retard who knows he has lost the war to consider using tactical nukes (think of hitler circa bunker era)....so in other words he may just consider it
Luckily there will be people inside that chain of events with greater livelihood instinct knowing that to push that particular button would not only speed up the end of this pathetic 'special military operation' but also the current Russian regime itself
But yeah people can have fun with the 'they can nuke country X off the face of the world !!!' comments, which ignores consequences and self interest haha
-
Planned, but executed under bitem because he knew bitem was a pussy and wouldn't do shit about it.
Trump and Putin make a GREAT pair.
Biggest LOSERS in the history of the world.
😆😆😆
-
Libturds hate Putin, yet cheer on the Ukraine Nazi party, then calling Trumpers "Nazi's".
Dumbest folks in existence... (And calling a red ball-cap a "hate symbol" that cheers on our country to be great) MAGA.
Really brain-dead libturd individuals and cult... ::)
Do you know exactly, or thereabouts, how many of these Nazi soldiers there were or how many Nazi-aligned politicians there were or are. The west, and even Jews, think it's completely fine as there are so few of them. Lol imagine that, as if the US would accept even one in say congress.
My understanding is that a large percentage of the soldiers perished at Azovstal?
-
Oh from what he has left over from the Cold War? As everyone can see, his military isn't that great. I would not be surprised if he pushed "the button" and it just dropped confetti down from the ceiling.
Even the West says he has more than 5000 pieces and carriers so to speak are better than the US - supersonic
-
Even the West says he has more than 5000 pieces and carriers so to speak are better than the US - supersonic
Any sort of link to this? All I've seen are broken down/dilapidated pieces. ???
-
Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is going to have a real bad day. Get it?
-
thats a very powerful scene which I feel like they called it many years ago as if they foresaw this coming
-
thats a very powerful scene which I feel like they called it many years ago as if they foresaw this coming
It is. Etched in my mind since I saw T2 as a kid in the 90's. When Putin starts talking about nukes I somehow think about this scene.
-
From 83' The Day After
-
Scary shit
-
putin would hate life if he started a nuke war, intelligenc miliitary would have him so fast
-
Anything is possible in this now-official Clown World.
Fortress is Team Russia, just to be clear. But shit, globally, is spiralling SO out of control, any and all continuing nonsense is to be expected.
We’re living in a time in which an individual can choose his or her, or thee, zee, it, they, them, whatever, sex/gender, after all.
Up is down. Blue is red. Left is right. Bad is good. Good is bad. Etc.
Clown. World.
-
Even the West says he has more than 5000 pieces and carriers so to speak are better than the US - supersonic
WWII ended after only 2 were dropped.
We can assume Quantity is irrelevant when it comes to nukes and hydrogen bombs. It is more about the act of who was willing to do it and deal with the outcome. It did end the war though.
If a nuke gets dropped today we can assume it ends WWIII. If it’s Russia who launches one, the aftermath being a cutting of the sea bed internet cables, cut off of satellite information, cut off from the Swift banking system, global sanctions on all imports/exports, seizing of all Russian owned assets.
How Russia hasn’t gone bananas already seems to demonstrate he isn’t in a winning position. We are sinking ships, blowing up pipelines, blowing up bridges, goading them to do something but so far no direct response.
-
WWII ended after only 2 were dropped.
We can assume Quantity is irrelevant when it comes to nukes and hydrogen bombs. It is more about the act of who was willing to do it and deal with the outcome. It did end the war though.
If a nuke gets dropped today we can assume it ends WWIII. If it’s Russia who launches one, the aftermath being a cutting of the sea bed internet cables, cut off of satellite information, cut off from the Swift banking system, global sanctions on all imports/exports, seizing of all Russian owned assets.
How Russia hasn’t gone bananas already seems to demonstrate he isn’t in a winning position. We are sinking ships, blowing up pipelines, blowing up bridges, goading them to do something but so far no direct response.
Haven't seen ANYONE advance this this type of theory yet. Russia drops a nuke in the US and it's all over? Or USA drops a nuke in Russia and it's all over? No it's more about Apocalypse and whether ANY human life survives. Now Lavrov did say that if they dropped a small tactical(vs strategic) nuke in Ukraine that no one might respond in kind because saving humankind is more important than committing worldwide suicide. Could you give a specific example where one nuke ends the war?
-
Haven't seen ANYONE advance this this type of theory yet. Russia drops a nuke in the US and it's all over? Or USA drops a nuke in Russia and it's all over? No it's more about Apocalypse and whether ANY human life survives. Now Lavrov did say that if they dropped a small tactical(vs strategic) nuke in Ukraine that no one might respond in kind because saving humankind is more important than committing worldwide suicide. Could you give a specific example where one nuke ends the war?
WWII I said the US dropped 2 nukes and it ended the war. That is fact. Japan got nuked and 6 days later WWII was over.
Therefore we can conclude the odds are 1 in 1 that another nuke drop ends a war. History provides us this odds.
Average Joe behaves like a total child with ‘oh you dropped a nuke, I’ll nuke you back’ mentality as if there is no other option. Yet we have history tell us nobody nuked anyone back. It is spastics who have their bin pushed over so they push a bin over in retaliation and then apply that logic to where if a nuke is launched then 10 more will be launched in return. No, just no.
Models of WWIII with China have already been done. The US would lose. Models of nuclear warefar with Russia have been done. The US gets utterly decimated (Russia does aswell).
Is it any surprise we have not seen any direct warfare or nukes? No. The US is fighting to its advantage which is economically.
-
WWII I said the US dropped 2 nukes and it ended the war. That is fact. Japan got nuked and 6 days later WWII was over.
Therefore we can conclude the odds are 1 in 1 that another nuke drop ends a war. History provides us this odds.
Average Joe behaves like a total child with ‘oh you dropped a nuke, I’ll nuke you back’ mentality as if there is no other option. Yet we have history tell us nobody nuked anyone back. It is spastics who have their bin pushed over so they push a bin over in retaliation and then apply that logic to where if a nuke is launched then 10 more will be launched in return. No, just no.
Models of WWIII with China have already been done. The US would lose. Models of nuclear warefar with Russia have been done. The US gets utterly decimated (Russia does aswell).
Is it any surprise we have not seen any direct warfare or nukes? No. The US is fighting to its advantage which is economically.
Japan surrendered because Russia was about to invade from the North and they saw what it was like for captured Germans. They were more than happy to surrender to the US and be occupied by them. Smart choice.
-
Japan surrendered because Russia was about to invade from the North and they saw what it was like for captured Germans. They were more than happy to surrender to the US and be occupied by them. Smart choice.
And Therefore the nukes ended WWII. 2 nukes got dropped. 6 days later Japan surrendered.
Basic logic says you just received 2 nukes, the probability is high you will get more in coming days/weeks if you don’t surrender you will be blown to total shit well before Russians come knocking.
-
Anything is possible in this now-official Clown World.
Fortress is Team Russia, just to be clear. But shit, globally, is spiralling SO out of control, any and all continuing nonsense is to be expected.
We’re living in a time in which an individual can choose his or her, or thee, zee, it, they, them, whatever, sex/gender, after all.
Up is down. Blue is red. Left is right. Bad is good. Good is bad. Etc.
Clown. World.
This ^^
Pure insanity. And the woke-libz who support this need to be "Kilaried"...
-
And Therefore the nukes ended WWII. 2 nukes got dropped. 6 days later Japan surrendered.
Basic logic says you just received 2 nukes, the probability is high you will get more in coming days/weeks if you don’t surrender you will be blown to total shit well before Russians come knocking.
The Tokyo and Osaka napalm bombings were much worse and they didn't surrender.
-
Japan surrendered because Russia was about to invade from the North and they saw what it was like for captured Germans. They were more than happy to surrender to the US and be occupied by them. Smart choice.
I’m not sure what readings/teaching brought you to this conclusion, but it’s an incorrect assumption on your part.
-
Japan surrendered because Russia was about to invade from the North and they saw what it was like for captured Germans. They were more than happy to surrender to the US and be occupied by them. Smart choice.
I thought the Japanese didn't know we only had 2 total nukes at the time and thought more would be dropped and that was why they surrendered.
-
I thought the Japanese didn't know we only had 2 total nukes at the time and thought more would be dropped and that was why they surrendered.
Read my post above. This is exactly why they surrendered, not any fear of Russia. Russia brought some troops in at the last second to occupy some territory but they were by no means responsible for Japanese surrender. We did the brunt of that work, while Russia did most of the work on the Germans. Although, I believe we did more to the Japanese than the Russians did to the Germans, as far as stopping them. If that makes sense.
-
I thought the Japanese didn't know we only had 2 total nukes at the time and thought more would be dropped and that was why they surrendered.
they dropped the bomb on Nagasaki even though the Japanaese were going to surrender
The Americans claimed a mis translation.
-
Japan surrendered because Russia was about to invade from the North and they saw what it was like for captured Germans. They were more than happy to surrender to the US and be occupied by them. Smart choice.
Utterly decimated US and Russia but the war stops after one nuke? Yeah I don't get it. Japan had no nukes, of course the surrendered. Imagine if the had 5000 nukes ready to go would they surrender? Lol yeah no.
-
Any sort of link to this? All I've seen are broken down/dilapidated pieces. ???
I can't remember all the article but wiki says this:
"Russia possesses an estimated 6,300 nuclear warheads as of 2022, the largest stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world; the second-largest stockpile is the United States' 5,428 warheads."
I know this is US data so to speak. And as far as the supersonic capability, I've seen all types of US experts talk about as a real thing, something that has the US at a decided disadvantage.
-
-
Vlad doesnt seem to like libtards, wokesters, confused gender morons and the like.
No wonder they hate him back, and seem to love Ukraine, w/ its corruption and retardation... (And Nazi-ism)..
-
Pretty sure it was the bombs that caused their surrender. It's practically stated so in the address to it's people :
"the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable ... . Should we continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization."[
-
Pretty sure it was the bombs that caused their surrender. It's practically stated so in the address to it's people :
"the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable ... . Should we continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization."[
https://blog.pangeanic.com/worst-translation-mistake
-
WWII I said the US dropped 2 nukes and it ended the war. That is fact. Japan got nuked and 6 days later WWII was over.
Therefore we can conclude the odds are 1 in 1 that another nuke drop ends a war. History provides us this odds.
Average Joe behaves like a total child with ‘oh you dropped a nuke, I’ll nuke you back’ mentality as if there is no other option. Yet we have history tell us nobody nuked anyone back. It is spastics who have their bin pushed over so they push a bin over in retaliation and then apply that logic to where if a nuke is launched then 10 more will be launched in return. No, just no.
Models of WWIII with China have already been done. The US would lose. Models of nuclear warefar with Russia have been done. The US gets utterly decimated (Russia does aswell).
Is it any surprise we have not seen any direct warfare or nukes? No. The US is fighting to its advantage which is economically.
Your logic is flawed. In 1945 no other country besides the US had an atomic bomb. Who was going to nuke them back? ??? ??? ???
-
Your logic is flawed. In 1945 no other country beside the US had an atomic bomb. Who was going to nuke them back? ??? ??? ???
The point is dropping nukes and 6 days later the war ended. I’m not trying to be a dick here but rather trying to show average pleb mentality is not applied in warfare.
The flawed logic is playing Grand Theft Auto and applying the same logic of player killing to real life.
The entire globe was shit scared of Covid for 2yrs. Yet the seemingly common belief of its going to be 100% nuke for nuke until the earth is wiped from the universe doesn’t even register on the fear scale.
Plebs walking around thinking it’s ok to launch hundreds of nukes and not even bat an eyelid then wonder why the laws are becoming more restrictive of their rights lol.
Sure, I could be completely wrong and GTA player killing logic is correct. In which case we will all be 💀 anyway so no one will be able to tell me ‘I told you so’.
-
Your logic is flawed. In 1945 no other country besides the US had an atomic bomb. Who was going to nuke them back? ??? ??? ???
Agree. Was going to post that as well.
-
The point is dropping nukes and 6 days later the war ended. I’m not trying to be a dick here but rather trying to show average pleb mentality is not applied in warfare.
The flawed logic is playing Grand Theft Auto and applying the same logic of player killing to real life.
The entire globe was shit scared of Covid for 2yrs. Yet the seemingly common belief of its going to be 100% nuke for nuke until the earth is wiped from the universe doesn’t even register on the fear scale.
Plebs walking around thinking it’s ok to launch hundreds of nukes and not even bat an eyelid then wonder why the laws are becoming more restrictive of their rights lol.
Sure, I could be completely wrong and GTA player killing logic is correct. In which case we will all be 💀 anyway so no one will be able to tell me ‘I told you so’.
Your logic is flawed. The two atomic bombs were dropped after a few years of constant battles. Japan was already weak. And they had no way to retaliate. They did not possess nukes. So they had no choice but to surrender or risk extinction.
You also have to remember that Russia and USA have underground bunkers. In Russia, they built them into mountains and can house many people.
https://www.bolnews.com/international/2022/03/inside-putins-siberian-guy-becomes-increasingly-real/#:~:text=Experts%20suggest%20that%20Putin%20has%20concealed%20his%20close,people%20in%20the%20event%20of%20a%20nuclear%20assault.
The problem is the West is being run by a mafia-like evil Deep State. They cannot be reasoned with. They cannot be arrested because they have ultimate power in the West and control of the US military. This became clear after the 2020 election fraud. Before this happened I considered that the US military might be independent. But I was naïve. Trump, unfortunately, did not get the US military in order.
Russia knows they are dealing with a criminal Deep State. This DS will not go down without themselves pushing the nuke buttons. They also have bunkers. They'd rather live in a bunker for a few years than face the music and be executed for their crimes.
Russia would rather use its nukes and end everyone than go down on its own with the rest of the world still living happily ever after. Not going to happen. It is like Israel's "Samson Option".
The risk for a nuclear escalation is extremely high right now, much higher than the Cuban Missile Crisis in my opinion. Because we don't have sane actors in the West. Look at the fool Biden that was installed in the White House. You can't have a discussion with that imbecile!
-
Pretty sure it was the bombs that caused their surrender. It's practically stated so in the address to it's people :
"the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable ... . Should we continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization."[
Maybe the UK will surrender after Russia sends two MRV hypersonic missiles that destroy everything? They like to poke the Bear until it is too late!
-
Its funny with some butt-hurt libturdz w/ gunts. Post real-news, like how this Admin destroyed a great economy, they fire back w/ fake meme's and nonsense.
Cant even be truthful w/ themselves. Cant see the obvious. They live in a SNL-like fantasy land, LOL.
Cant even be a tiny-bit truthful, even w/ themselves. Hilarious... ::)
-
Pretty sure it was the bombs that caused their surrender. It's practically stated so in the address to it's people :
"the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable ... . Should we continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization."[
Without the use of the atomic bombs, the US would most probably have to launch a land invasion.
A study done for Stimson's staff by William Shockley estimated that invading Japan would cost 1.7–4 million American casualties, including 400,000–800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities.
The key assumption was large-scale participation by civilians in the defense of Japan. Japanese military directives ordered the execution of all POWs being held if Japan was ever invaded. Towards the end of the war about 100,000 Allied prisoners were in Japanese custody.
Outside the government, well-informed civilians were also making guesses. Kyle Palmer, war correspondent for the Los Angeles Times, said half a million to a million Americans would die by the end of the war.
Herbert Hoover, in memorandums submitted to Truman and Stimson, also estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 fatalities, which were believed to be conservative estimates; however, it is not known if Hoover discussed these specific figures in his meetings with Truman. The Chief of the Army Operations Division thought them "entirely too high" under "our present plan of campaign."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall#:~:text=A%20study%20done%20for%20Stimson's,to%20ten%20million%20Japanese%20fatalities.
-
Without the use of the atomic bombs, the US would most probably have to launch a land invasion.
A study done for Stimson's staff by William Shockley estimated that invading Japan would cost 1.7–4 million American casualties, including 400,000–800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities.
The key assumption was large-scale participation by civilians in the defense of Japan. Japanese military directives ordered the execution of all POWs being held if Japan was ever invaded. Towards the end of the war about 100,000 Allied prisoners were in Japanese custody.
Outside the government, well-informed civilians were also making guesses. Kyle Palmer, war correspondent for the Los Angeles Times, said half a million to a million Americans would die by the end of the war.
Herbert Hoover, in memorandums submitted to Truman and Stimson, also estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 fatalities, which were believed to be conservative estimates; however, it is not known if Hoover discussed these specific figures in his meetings with Truman. The Chief of the Army Operations Division thought them "entirely too high" under "our present plan of campaign."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall#:~:text=A%20study%20done%20for%20Stimson's,to%20ten%20million%20Japanese%20fatalities.
Wow...that's heavy.
I had heard a land raid of Japan would have been difficult to impossible to implement - and I guess those numbers show it.
-
Russia would rather use its nukes and end everyone than go down on its own with the rest of the world still living happily ever after. Not going to happen. It is like Israel's "Samson Option".
My communication on this is likely poor but my point still being missed entirely.
What you just said is the prime example.
average Joe does not use the same logic as someone with access to nukes because average Joe is childish and an emotional toddler.
How many nukes have been dropped in war? 2
Were they are the start or the end? End
How many nukes built since WWII? Thousands
How many wars/battles since WWII? Quite a few
How many nukes dropped since WWII? None. This even includes the Cold War with Russia
How does one look at that and go from no nukes dropped in 80yrs to everybody will nuke everybody else because it is better than losing……
if your NFL team is losing do you run out and start stabbing the other team players because it’s better than losing?
Plot twist - it ends up being the US who makes tactical errors and finds themselves collapsing faster than everyone else. Do you now decide to nuke everybody because it’s better than losing just like you claim Russia will do?
-
My communication on this is likely poor but my point still being missed entirely.
What you just said is the prime example.
average Joe does not use the same logic as someone with access to nukes because average Joe is childish and an emotional toddler.
How many nukes have been dropped in war? 2
Were they are the start or the end? End
How many nukes built since WWII? Thousands
How many wars/battles since WWII? Quite a few
How many nukes dropped since WWII? None. This even includes the Cold War with Russia
How does one look at that and go from no nukes dropped in 80yrs to everybody will nuke everybody else because it is better than losing……
if your NFL team is losing do you run out and start stabbing the other team players because it’s better than losing?
Plot twist - it ends up being the US who makes tactical errors and finds themselves collapsing faster than everyone else. Do you now decide to nuke everybody because it’s better than losing just like you claim Russia will do?
None of the battles since WW2 required nukes. USA did not need it in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. All those nations were weak opponents and lacked nuclear weapons.
Name one major battle between two nuclear powers since WW2!
In case you haven't noticed, the Deep State agenda has been accelerating for the past few years. Globalism is the end goal and Nationalist Russia stands in that way. In London, you can go for a whole day without seeing any white person. WW1 and WW2 killed millions of white people and these dead white people did not have any children either. So an exponential number of whites were exterminated by the Deep State WW1 and WW2 agenda.
Now it is also possible that Putin is an agent of the DS as Churchill and Hitler were. Time will tell.
All I am saying is don't discount Russia using nukes if they stand to lose their nation and land. Russia has already been canceled via all the sanctions and anti-Russia propaganda in the media. The ultimate goal is to cancel Russia physically. And they know it. They've been talking about it a lot. Even Putin has mentioned it.
And don't underestimate how evil the DS is. No deals can be made with them. The only solution for humanity is to wipe the DS and their descendants off the face of the Earth. Only killing them would work.
Russia can't win a conventional war against NATO. But they won't be the only loser in a nuclear war! In racing, there is a saying: "Run what ya brung." If you have nukes and you're losing, why not use them? The USA used it against Japan and they weren't even losing!
-
Mayday, this is what Russians think:
(https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=875,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/117/642/541/original/667a65c9a7291b29.png)
-
My communication on this is likely poor but my point still being missed entirely.
What you just said is the prime example.
average Joe does not use the same logic as someone with access to nukes because average Joe is childish and an emotional toddler.
How many nukes have been dropped in war? 2
Were they are the start or the end? End
How many nukes built since WWII? Thousands
How many wars/battles since WWII? Quite a few
How many nukes dropped since WWII? None. This even includes the Cold War with Russia
How does one look at that and go from no nukes dropped in 80yrs to everybody will nuke everybody else because it is better than losing……
if your NFL team is losing do you run out and start stabbing the other team players because it’s better than losing?
Plot twist - it ends up being the US who makes tactical errors and finds themselves collapsing faster than everyone else. Do you now decide to nuke everybody because it’s better than losing just like you claim Russia will do?
UK is going to be non-white very soon and forever after that. What's the point of trying to save UK? They are already gone. A nuked UK might be better than the future that awaits it. It will become insignificant. Just another African island. Eventually it will have to be flushed down the toilet.
-
Mayday, this is what Russians think:
(https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=875,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/117/642/541/original/667a65c9a7291b29.png)
Imagine an American military leader saying that. The MSM would have a total meltdown! ;D
-
Well, I hope we don’t all die from nuclear warfare.
Move to Mars with Musk?
-
Mayday, this is what Russians think:
(https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=875,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/117/642/541/original/667a65c9a7291b29.png)
He's not wrong though.
-
loving the bridge nuke