Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: affeman on February 20, 2023, 11:34:22 AM
-
Good trade-off? ???
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/zG7wWXRg/IMG-0379-1-removebg-preview-2.png).
-
point of correction: accelerating the manifestation of genetic health defects in return for exceeding your genetic muscle size potential, way beyond remotely aesthetically pleasing proportions that your frame can support
-
His nuts seem to have shriveled up, it just looks like a cock without balls. Pretty wild that people seem to be oblivious about that condition, or owning it to the point of putting on a thong for pictures in their backyard to post online. It's particularly weird also that this is in combination with a massive jihadi beard style, and cancer patient scalped look. So many things that are out of place and don't match up with eachother, we could spend hours breaking these things down, none of this stuff makes any sense
-
Actually he did a reverse hair transplant, he Moved all his head hair to his beard area
It’s an illusion, going to for the tough guy constipated look
-
height>hair>muscles
-
height>hair>muscles
Where do jawline, teeth, cranium/forehead shape, skin quality, youth/age, cock size, fertility, wealth, and social status fit into that list?
-
In the older days, bodybuilders didn't have to sacrifice their hair for muscle.
(https://www.trulyhuge.com/1980s-bodybuilding.jpg)
Different story for the current era:
(https://fitnish.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/mro16.jpg)
-
His hair was already thin. Like True Adonis thin
-
His hair was already thin. Like True Adonis thin
also a frontal combover to hide the hairline
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/zG7wWXRg/IMG-0379-1-removebg-preview-2.png)
its Wilfred Brimley
-
Chaos traded hair and muscles for child-birthing hips.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/zG7wWXRg/IMG-0379-1-removebg-preview-2.png)
its Wilfred Brimley
-
In the older days, bodybuilders didn't have to sacrifice their hair for muscle.
(https://www.trulyhuge.com/1980s-bodybuilding.jpg)
Boyer Coe was a known hairpiece (ab-)user
-
Boyer Coe was a known hairpiece (ab-)user
And Al Beckles was almost as bald as bhank.
-
In the older days, bodybuilders didn't have to sacrifice their hair for muscle.
(https://www.trulyhuge.com/1980s-bodybuilding.jpg)
Different story for the current era:
(https://fitnish.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/mro16.jpg)
Phil and Rhoden had hair/weren't balding, but just didn't have great hairlines
-
Hair or no hair, this guys face isn’t doing him any favors.
So no real lose either way.
-
Good trade off you ask?
Well depends on the individual you are asking and is solely user dependent, but this is common sense...which apparently isn't so common anymore these days.
-
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more hair
-
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more hair
Just when we thought we had all the answers…..
You flip the question on it’s head!
-
I have a full head of hair but I would trade it all for a certain look no question.
-
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more hair
Fuck no.
-
Good trade-off? ???
Not if you're that particular guy.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zG7wWXRg/IMG-0379-1-removebg-preview-2.png)
its Wilfred Brimley
Bhanks looks like he's ready to waltz right into the Blue Oyster Bar with a willing and ready Mr. Spaulding.
-
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more hair
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more cock size
-
The real question is whether anyone would trade their hard-earned muscles for more cock size
I think we all know that answer!
-
His hair was already thin. Like True Adonis thin
Yup. He was going to lose it no matter what
-
Wouldn't want to trade anything for Rory