Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on August 03, 2023, 10:22:24 PM
-
https://gettr.com/post/p2ngrvtcc9b
-
https://gettr.com/post/p2ngrvtcc9b
Lying would be not owning up to making a mistake. Jack Smith volunteered making the little fo pas in writing. See below:
"Included in Production 3 is additional CCTV footage from The Mar-a-Lago Club that the Government obtained from the Trump Organization on May 9 and May 12, 2023, in response to a grand jury subpoena served on April 27," the letter explained. "On July 27, as part of the preparation for the superseding indictment coming later that day and the discovery production for Defendant De Oliveira, the Government learned that this footage had not been processed and uploaded to the platform established for the defense to view the subpoenaed footage. The Government's representation at the July 18 hearing that all surveillance footage the Government had obtained pre-indictment had been produced was therefore incorrect."
https://www.newsweek.com/jack-smith-admits-mistake-trump-mar-lago-tapes-1816775
-
Hahahaha. Another desperate thread to hilariously backfire on Qoach.
-
Lying would be not owning up to making a mistake. Jack Smith volunteered making the little fo pas in writing. See below:
It's "faux".
(https://media.tenor.com/HitmKqvfcQ8AAAAC/stupid-pixar.gif)
-
It's "faux".
(https://media.tenor.com/HitmKqvfcQ8AAAAC/stupid-pixar.gif)
:D
-
He just can’t help himself. He knows he has a weak case(s) so just like in the fake J6 show trial and his fake impeachments, they have to lie and hide evidence
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/icymi-jack-smith-lied-latest-trump-indictment-purposely/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=icymi-jack-smith-lied-latest-trump-indictment-purposely&fbclid=PAAaalWwVsZMex9sFkv36vdR6oTwikgdj7BX9zr43296vx540BOwnwwS6dxUU_aem_AVhPK3iYrPRM4cTyKeldcocM1TW-2oaIYO64aq-Fv8gzHfflmao6miPwLLHxoVI22y4
-
A weak case where all the proof was supplied by Republicans. ::)
Keep telling yourself that Qoach-47
-
These trials are going to be sooooooooo hilarious. GOOD TIMES!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
---
Barr calls Trump indictment ‘tip of the iceberg’ in Jack Smith’s case.
Former Trump handpicked Attorney General Bill Barr called former President Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment the “tip of the iceberg,” arguing that special counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department (DOJ) have “a lot more” evidence to come on Trump’s state of mind.
Now Trump's handpicked Vice President Mike Pence is with Barr.
Pence remarked Trump asked him to go against the constitution to overturn a legal election. Pence said no person who goes against the constitution should ever be president or ever again be president. Look it up it's easy to find.
---
-
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/judge-aileen-cannon-blasts-jack-smith-operating-district/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=judge-aileen-cannon-blasts-jack-smith-operating-district&fbclid=PAAaZZTqoVxz6O8IoDJxadH2oB-WpM0ov_yrfY3QqiyvTCtLH_GdlwAH767Ic_aem_AXf0tlFnfOujZ6iheIcwvnaoh8ESQEoLRMA_NTn_JMya8pQTFMRSHsNELdX-KROzwNg
-
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/judge-aileen-cannon-blasts-jack-smith-operating-district/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=judge-aileen-cannon-blasts-jack-smith-operating-district&fbclid=PAAaZZTqoVxz6O8IoDJxadH2oB-WpM0ov_yrfY3QqiyvTCtLH_GdlwAH767Ic_aem_AXf0tlFnfOujZ6iheIcwvnaoh8ESQEoLRMA_NTn_JMya8pQTFMRSHsNELdX-KROzwNg
Meaningless.
But taking a page out of Trumpy's book it should be ok for Smith to request to move the trial to another location with another judge since he can't get a fair trial there right? ;) hahahhaa
-
Hahahaha.... "lying" huh? FAUX knows all about lies and their consequences. :D :D :D
---
Fox News Anchor Says ‘Hatching Schemes to Stay in Office’ Isn’t a Crime
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Fox+News+Anchor+Says+%E2%80%98Hatching+Schemes+to+Stay+in+Office%E2%80%99+Isn%E2%80%99t+a+Crime
Fox News anchor Julie Banderas on Monday curiously defended Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election by insisting that “hatching schemes to stay in office” while “claiming you won an election you know you lost” are not crimes.
While serving as guest anchor on Monday’s broadcast of The Faulkner Focus, Banderas interviewed former deputy assistant attorney general Tom Dupree about Trump’s attempt to move the Jan. 6 trial to West Virginia and force the judge to recuse herself.
After Dupree said Trump’s legal team faced an “uphill battle” on both fronts, Banderas then raged about how it was “impossible” for the thrice-indicted ex-president to be “impartially” tried in that case. She also noted that Trump is expected to soon be indicted for a fourth time, this time in Georgia over his election meddling efforts in that state.
“Politics written all over it,” she exclaimed. “Attorneys are supposed to represent the law, not politics, OK? Judges, same! Judges are the only ones able to recuse themselves, OK? So it is up to a judge to recuse themself. So if they have it in for one of the future cases, there is no way to recuse themselves. So obviously the system is a little bit broken, I would have to say.”
Bringing up the likely indictment in Georgia, Banderas said Fulton Country District Attorney Fani Willis was investigating whether Trump had “committed crimes” in trying to overthrow the 2020 election, notably using air quotes.
“I want to talk about Trump’s alleged crimes for one second,” she said. “He hasn’t been indicted for incitement, we know that, right? So, it’s not a crime to tell lies.”
Banderas then added: “Being a narcissist is not a crime. Hatching schemes to stay in office is not a crime. And claiming you won an election you know you lost is not a crime.”
--
-
Jack Smiths wife
https://www.facebook.com/ONLY1DAVE/videos/589616966585533/?mibextid=cr9u03
-
Jack Smiths wife
https://www.facebook.com/ONLY1DAVE/videos/589616966585533/?mibextid=cr9u03
Is that his first wife? Unlike the multi divorced retards running around lying about "stolen elections".
-
Is that his first wife? Unlike the multi divorced retards running around lying about "stolen elections".
It’s irrelevant if it was his first, fifth or 10th
-
It’s irrelevant if it was his first, fifth or 10th
Not really. Except in the fractured little brain of yours.
-
Jack Smiths wife
https://www.facebook.com/ONLY1DAVE/videos/589616966585533/?mibextid=cr9u03
Good grief. You mean Garland couldn't find a special prosecutor who isn't married to an Obama/Biden supporter, who produced an Obama movie, and donated to the Obama and Biden campaigns? Reminds me of all the Hillary Clinton donors on the Mueller team.
-
*YAWN*
-
It’s habitual
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/dirty-jack-smith-admits-he-included-inaccurate-information/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dirty-jack-smith-admits-he-included-inaccurate-information&fbclid=PAAabw5piop8PgG_e2WMqkttETAGT2_VEIIwHpu6SsnOMwApJO5PrY-yYdqWM_aem_AXLc_Vl4oGAIgWmK20T9aieFntPJyBdR4UF0lh3XZF-z_yGoe2MRWP9HhQjtKjomIX8
-
You sound upset by this. Jack Smith really has you triggered. Just imagine how much more irrational those two brain cells are going to be when Fani drops her indictment as well.
GOOD TIMES!
-
You sound upset by this. Jack Smith really has you triggered. Just imagine how much more irrational those two brain cells are going to be when Fani drops her indictment as well.
GOOD TIMES!
Says the effeminate loser obsessed with a 70 + year old man and calls him "Trumpy" ::) 20 time a day ???
-
Jack Smiths wife
https://www.facebook.com/ONLY1DAVE/videos/589616966585533/?mibextid=cr9u03
Who cares what Jack's wife does? Apparently the idiot talking in the video. Not impressed.
-
It’s irrelevant if it was his first, fifth or 10th
What his wife says and does is irrelevant alright. What a stupid leap. ::)
-
What his wife says and does is irrelevant alright. What a stupid leap. ::)
Your response doesn’t surprise me….right over your head
-
Hahahaha. Another desperate thread to hilariously backfire on Qoach.
There should be a cut and paste option for that, like an emoji we can label as "Another link posted either from a known suspect source" or "The headline doesn't match the content" emoji
I propose the ;D for the former and ::) for the later
-
What his wife says and does is irrelevant alright. What a stupid leap. ::)
Remember when Trumps wife actually wore a coat that said something like "I Really don't care, do u?" On her way to a migrant detention camp for children... I wonder what Getbig had to say then?
-
There should be a cut and paste option for that, like an emoji we can label as "Another link posted either from a known suspect source" or "The headline doesn't match the content" emoji
I propose the ;D for the former and ::) for the later
Exactly. A "more bullshit and excuses from Qoach-47" emoji. "
-
The orange makeup has to go on extra thick now to hide his high BP. Remember : the feds conviction rate is north of 90%. And Trumpy really has nothing to offer up for a plea deal. :D "I want to clear my name. I want to clear my name." So go to court and do it. If you believe your are innocent of the charges, get into the courtroom and be vindicated. hahahaha. But he won't do that. Because it requires testifying under oath and telling the truth and everyone knows he can't stop lying.
---
"Rattled" Trump melts down on Truth Social over Jack Smith's proposed trial date
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=%22Rattled%22+Trump+melts+down+on+Truth+Social+over+Jack+Smith%27s+proposed+trial+date
Former President Donald Trump took to social media Thursday evening to bemoan the accelerated timeline special counsel Jack Smith requested in his 2020 election interference case, ultimately writing the trial date off as "election interference" itself. Smith filed a motion to Judge Tanya Chutkan earlier on Thursday, proposing a Dec 11, 2023, date for jury selection and Jan. 2, 2024, date for the trial because of the "gravity and historic nature of the charges" as well as the immense public interest in the proceedings, according to The New York Times.
"Deranged Jack Smith has just asked for a trial on the Biden Indictment to take place on January 2nd., just ahead of the important Iowa Caucuses. Only an out of touch lunatic would ask for such a date, ONE DAY into the New Year, and maximum Election Interference with IOWA!" the GOP frontrunner wrote on Truth Social, referencing the Iowa Republican caucuses slated for Jan. 15, 2024. "Such a trial, which should never take place due to my First Amendment Rights, and massive BIDEN CORRUPTION, should only happen, if at all, AFTER THE ELECTION. The same with other Fake Biden Indictments. ELECTION INTERFERENCE!"
"That January 2 trial has really got him rattled," former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega tweeted of Trump Thursday night. The trial date for Smith's other case against the former president, regarding his retention of national security documents post-presidency, was set by the presiding judge for May 20, 2024.
---
-
Remember when Trumps wife actually wore a coat that said something like "I Really don't care, do u?" On her way to a migrant detention camp for children... I wonder what Getbig had to say then?
Lately, Melania has been wearing that jacket in front of guests at Mar-a-Lago when Trump is home.
-
Lately, Melania has been wearing that jacket in front of guests at Mar-a-Lago when Trump is home.
Ohhhhhh... burn!
-
Lol… lurker and his state ran propaganda hit pieces. 😂
-
Lol… lurker and his state ran propaganda hit pieces. 😂
Lol.... Qoach and his usual inability to debunk anything.
R