Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on September 12, 2023, 09:15:07 AM
-
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is officially backing an impeachment inquiry, he announced in a brief statement to the media Tuesday.
Punchbowl News reported earlier Tuesday morning that McCarthy is set to tell a closed door meeting of House Republicans that an impeachment inquiry is the "logical next step," in the GOP's investigations into Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.
Thursday's meeting has been called so GOP House members can get an update on the probes headed by House Oversight Committee Chair, James Comer, R-Ky., and House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
Punchbowl noted that McCarthy will announce that the two chairs have found sufficient information that requires the House to formalize an impeachment inquiry. The inquiry is seen as a way to get the Bidens' bank records.
Punchbowl reported that the two probes have yet to come up with any direct evidence showing the president personally profited off his son's foreign business dealings.
Several Republicans — including Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Ken Buck of Colorado have expressed skepticism over the need for an inquiry.
Some Senate Republicans are bristling at their counterparts in the House pushing to indict Joe Biden.
Asked if she believes there is enough evidence to impeach Joe Biden, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., said bluntly: "I do not."
"I don't know what the basis of this call for impeachment is. It just sounds like a lot of noise to me," she told The Washington Times.
Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, told Axios he didn't think there's been "any high crimes or misdemeanors" alleged.
The Messenger reported that last week, the White House accused McCarthy of lying about the allegations of bribery against the president after the speaker claimed Congress found evidence that Joe Biden received payments while abroad during his time as vice president.
A White House spokesman called a potential impeachment inquiry "shameless and baseless."
https://www.newsmax.com/us/kevin-mccarthy-support-impeachment/2023/09/12/id/1134109/?dkt_nbr=6F12129ym9is
-
“Ok”
hahahahha
-
Kevin McCarthy Lays Out Evidence in Decision to Launch Biden Impeachment Inquiry
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the House is launching an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden, citing at least six separate allegations that led to the decision.
First, he cited the House Oversight Committee’s findings that Biden “did lie to the American people about his own knowledge of his family’s foreign business dealings.”
“Eyewitnesses have testified that the president joined on multiple phone calls and had multiple interactions, dinners, resulting in cars and millions of dollars into (sic) his son’s and his son’s business partners,” he said.
According to evidence gathered by the committee, Biden claimed he never spoke to his family about their business dealings, but did so at least 16 times.
Second, McCarthy also cited bank records that show “nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden family members and associates through various shell companies.”
The House Oversight Committee announced in August that it had found bank records that showed that Biden businesses received millions from business schemes in Romania and China, and that nine Biden family members received payments from the family foreign business ventures, including two of Joe Biden’s grandchildren.
Third, McCarthy also said the Treasury Department has “more than 150 transactions involving the Biden family and other business associates that were flagged as suspicious activity by U.S. banks.”
In April 2022, CBS News reported that U.S. banks had flagged over 150 suspicious financial transactions from Hunter and James Biden, which included wire transfers of “large” amounts of money.
Fourth, McCarthy cited an FBI informant who alleged that the president and his son both received bribes of $5 million each.
Fifth, McCarthy cited Biden using “his official office to coordinate with Hunter Biden’s business partners about Hunter’s role in Burisma Ukrainian energy company,” referring to recent revelations from Hunter Biden’s laptop that then-Vice President Biden used private or alias accounts to send government information to Hunter.
According to a Wall Street Journal editorial, “One email alerted Hunter to a call the Vice President made to then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko—at the same time Hunter was on the board of Ukrainian gas giant Burisma.” Another email showed Hunter Biden “using his business email in 2014 to write to his father’s ‘robinware’ account, asking the veep to call him before making a specific government staffing decision. Joe replied: ‘Re Johnny call me right away Dad.'”
Finally, McCarthy said — likely in reference to the Justice Department’s handling of its investigation of Hunter Biden, “Despite the serious allegations, it appears that the president’s family has been offered special treatment by Biden’s own administration — treatment that [they] not otherwise would have received if they were not related to the President.”
These allegations paint a picture of a culture of corruption,” McCarthy said. “These are allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption.”
He concluded: “And they warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives. That’s why today I am directing our house committee to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. This logical next step will give our committees the full power to gather all the facts and answers for the American public.”
The inquiry will be led by House Oversight Chairman James Comer (KY), Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (OH), and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO).
“The American people deserve to know that the public offices are not for sale, and that the federal government is not being used to cover up the actions of a politically associated family,” McCarthy said.
“Now, I would encourage the President and his team to fully cooperate with this investigation in the interests of transparency. We are committed to getting the answers for the American public, nothing more, nothing less. We will go wherever the evidence takes us.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/12/kevin-mccarthy-lays-out-evidence-decision-launch-biden-impeachment-inquiry/
-
https://oversight.house.gov/blog/joe-biden-lied-at-least-15-times-about-his-familys-business-schemes/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/05/10/james-comer-names-9-biden-family-members-business-payments/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/07/20/document-chuck-grassley-releases-fbi-record-alleging-vp-joe-biden-foreign-bribery-scheme/
-
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is officially backing an impeachment inquiry, he announced in a brief statement to the media Tuesday.
Punchbowl News reported earlier Tuesday morning that McCarthy is set to tell a closed door meeting of House Republicans that an impeachment inquiry is the "logical next step," in the GOP's investigations into Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.
Thursday's meeting has been called so GOP House members can get an update on the probes headed by House Oversight Committee Chair, James Comer, R-Ky., and House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
Punchbowl noted that McCarthy will announce that the two chairs have found sufficient information that requires the House to formalize an impeachment inquiry. The inquiry is seen as a way to get the Bidens' bank records.
Punchbowl reported that the two probes have yet to come up with any direct evidence showing the president personally profited off his son's foreign business dealings.
Several Republicans — including Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Ken Buck of Colorado have expressed skepticism over the need for an inquiry.
Some Senate Republicans are bristling at their counterparts in the House pushing to indict Joe Biden.
Asked if she believes there is enough evidence to impeach Joe Biden, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., said bluntly: "I do not."
"I don't know what the basis of this call for impeachment is. It just sounds like a lot of noise to me," she told The Washington Times.
Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, told Axios he didn't think there's been "any high crimes or misdemeanors" alleged.
The Messenger reported that last week, the White House accused McCarthy of lying about the allegations of bribery against the president after the speaker claimed Congress found evidence that Joe Biden received payments while abroad during his time as vice president.
A White House spokesman called a potential impeachment inquiry "shameless and baseless."
https://www.newsmax.com/us/kevin-mccarthy-support-impeachment/2023/09/12/id/1134109/?dkt_nbr=6F12129ym9is
Did you read this in its entirety? If so, good for you. And even better that you had the fortitude to post it here.
-
“Ok”
hahaha
-
Did you read this in its entirety? If so, good for you. And even better that you had the fortitude to post it here.
Yep, I did and Yet it’s still starting and I’m sure a lot more evidence will be presented. This other R’s especially Romney is irrelevant
-
“Ok”
hahaha
It appears Coach has a selective reading issue or diminished comprehension. This is only one of a multitude of links he's posted where the full contents of the article almost completely contradict what the lead-in implied. If he could only learn to read beyond the headlines, he might be better informed.
-
It appears Coach has a selective reading issue or diminished comprehension. This is only one of a multitude of links he's posted where the full contents of the article almost completely contradict what the lead-in implied. If he could only learn to read beyond the headlines, he might be better informed.
Do you know, prime the offer I made to lurker also applies to you. If you think you have better information than me, or my sources, let’s have a live debate. Why do you people keep running? Even our leftist politicians will not have a debate. This is a trend.
Trump got fake impeached twice on literally zero evidence and not only words there’s zero evidence, they had to alter what evidence they supposedly had to lie to the American people and just like now you and Lurker, and whoever else buys into this shit went right along with it just like you do now.
And before you correct me on my spelling on my grammar, I’m driving using voice to text.
-
Do you know, prime the offer I made to lurker also applies to you. If you think you have better information than me, or my sources, let’s have a live debate. Why do you people keep running? Even our leftist politicians will not have a debate. This is a trend.
Trump got fake impeached twice on literally zero evidence and not only words there’s zero evidence, they had to alter what evidence they supposedly had to lie to the American people and just like now you and Lurker, and whoever else buys into this shit went right along with it just like you do now.
And before you correct me on my spelling on my grammar, I’m driving using voice to text.
Why do you continue to ask why won't anyone "live debate" you? All 3 of us have clearly explained why. Yet you fumble with the explanation. It seems you are befuddled by it. (Not missing a chance to use befuddled).
Your information, your sources, have steered you wrong for at least 3 years yet you cling to them like a baby calf to it's mothers teat. That you continue to cling to such nonsense indicates a learning disability. I wouldn't debate you just as I wouldn't participate in a foot race with someone in a wheelchair. It is kind of "cute" that you think in a live debate you would suddenly accomplish what you have failed to accomplish in written form for 3 years, which is actually win an argument.
-
Do you know, prime the offer I made to lurker also applies to you. If you think you have better information than me, or my sources, let’s have a live debate. Why do you people keep running? Even our leftist politicians will not have a debate. This is a trend.
Trump got fake impeached twice on literally zero evidence and not only words there’s zero evidence, they had to alter what evidence they supposedly had to lie to the American people and just like now you and Lurker, and whoever else buys into this shit went right along with it just like you do now.
And before you correct me on my spelling on my grammar, I’m driving using voice to text.
You missed the point. Not questioning your sources here. I referenced your post and bolded the parts of it that you either ignored or didn't read. If this were a one-off, then no big deal, but truthfully is a pattern with you which you have been called out on by several others.
You frequently bring up the topic of debate. Is it some kind of ploy? I believe I asked you once how you imagine this to work. What would be the venue? I am not interested in traveling to L.A. just to have a debate with you. No offense, but what you think is not that important to me. Aren't we in fact debating on Getbig in our posts? If you are so keen on debates, talk your hero into debating the other contenders for GOP nomination.
Big deal Trump got impeached twice. Get over it. What the heck does that have to do with anything going on today? Are you comparing it to the smattering of Republican House Reps yipping about impeaching Biden? I would like nothing better than to see that small group of MAGA folks try to bring impeachment forward. They will end up looking like fools, they don't even have the support of other Republican House Reps. And if by some miracle those loud mouths impeached him in the house, the Senate will never uphold it. Just like it was with Trump, this is all a colossal waste of our taxes... and it is all for not.
BTW, voice to text typos is no big deal except when the reader cannot make sense of your post because of the typo. Would you prefer folks just take wild guesses what you meant to say?
-
[GOP rep. torches reporter claiming Americans see no evidence for Biden impeachment: 'You don't report on it’/i]
Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., called out a journalist on Tuesday for claiming that Americans "can't see" evidence that President Biden has committed wrongdoing worthy of impeachment.
The GOP lawmaker pointed out several examples of evidence of the president’s corruption in response to a question reportedly from U.K. Channel 4 Washington correspondent Siobhan Kennedy. He also said that many Americans are in the dark about it because mainstream reporters like her "don’t report on it."
The exchange happened during a press conference held by members of Congress outside the Capitol Tuesday, hours after Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., announced a congressional impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Perry, the House Freedom Caucus chair, motioned to Kennedy to ask him one final question before he left the podium. She said, "Can I just ask, what actual evidence do you have as opposed to allegations to show to the American people that would merit an actual impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden, and prove that today isn’t just about –"
Perry interjected with a sarcastic reply. "Oh, I don’t know."
She then finished her question, wondering if McCarthy was doing this "for the sake of enacting political revenge for the impeachment of Donald Trump."
Perry immediately shut Kennedy down, declaring, "This isn’t about political revenge. We have the bank accounts. We can see – ma’am – you can see that the homes that the Bidens own can’t be afforded on a congressional or a Senate salary."
He continued: "You also understand that it’s not normal for family members to receive millions of dollars from overseas interests. Those things aren’t normal. That’s not normal to have 20 shell companies. These things are not normal, and it alludes to not only just widespread corruption, but money laundering, if not influence-peddling itself.
Adding in Biden’s self-proclaimed hand in the firing of a prosecutor looking into his son’s business dealings in Ukraine, Perry said, "And we also have the vice president at the time on record saying that the prosecutor was fired. Well, son of a b----, the prosecutor was fired. Because the prosecutor was going after the company that his son was working on."
"That’s what we have," Perry proclaimed, becoming more animated. "If you can’t see that. If you are that blind – I’ll turn it over to the attorneys," he said as he invited others to replace him on the podium.
As he walked away, the Channel 4 reporter got one more statement in, saying, "The American people can’t see that. They think it’s political revenge."
Perry fired back, "Because you don’t report on it."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/gop-rep-torches-reporter-claiming-americans-see-no-evidence-for-biden-impeachment-you-don-t-report-on-it/ar-AA1gD3Sn
-
He continued: "You also understand that it’s not normal for family members to receive millions of dollars from overseas interests. Those things aren’t normal. That’s not normal to have 20 shell companies. These things are not normal, and it alludes to not only just widespread corruption, but money laundering, if not influence-peddling itself.
Although there is a mountain of evidence of corruption, I think this is probably the most damning.
-
Why do you continue to ask why won't anyone "live debate" you? All 3 of us have clearly explained why. Yet you fumble with the explanation. It seems you are befuddled by it. (Not missing a chance to use befuddled).
Your information, your sources, have steered you wrong for at least 3 years yet you cling to them like a baby calf to it's mothers teat. That you continue to cling to such nonsense indicates a learning disability. I wouldn't debate you just as I wouldn't participate in a foot race with someone in a wheelchair. It is kind of "cute" that you think in a live debate you would suddenly accomplish what you have failed to accomplish in written form for 3 years, which is actually win an argument.
If that’s what you think then let’s do it. Quit running
-
Why do you continue to ask why won't anyone "live debate" you? All 3 of us have clearly explained why. Yet you fumble with the explanation. It seems you are befuddled by it. (Not missing a chance to use befuddled).
Lets go
Your information, your sources, have steered you wrong for at least 3 years yet you cling to them like a baby calf to it's mothers teat. That you continue to cling to such nonsense indicates a learning disability. I wouldn't debate you just as I wouldn't participate in a foot race with someone in a wheelchair. It is kind of "cute" that you think in a live debate you would suddenly accomplish what you have failed to accomplish in written form for 3 years, which is actually win an argument.
-
Why do you continue to ask why won't anyone "live debate" you? All 3 of us have clearly explained why. Yet you fumble with the explanation. It seems you are befuddled by it. (Not missing a chance to use befuddled).
Your information, your sources, have steered you wrong for at least 3 years yet you cling to them like a baby calf to it's mothers teat. That you continue to cling to such nonsense indicates a learning disability. I wouldn't debate you just as I wouldn't participate in a foot race with someone in a wheelchair. It is kind of "cute" that you think in a live debate you would suddenly accomplish what you have failed to accomplish in written form for 3 years, which is actually win an argument.
Wrong? Since Trump came down that escalator you’ve bought into literally every made up, lie, “smoking gun” and allegations that’s been said or written only to have almost every one debunked starting with “Russian Collusion” which was also been proved a lie.
You think there isn’t a two tiered justice system and all everything that’s happening isn’t election interference, you think going after Trump and anyone associated with him is normal. You actually think there is no corruption, fuck, you even think there’s no evidence against Biden and his crackhead kid.
Here’s a question for you. If you don’t know what corruption looks like, how do we know you weren’t a corrupt cop? If you want to know what corruption looks like where you served, look no farther then watching Austin go to shit from it.
LETS FUCKING GO Agnostic.
-
Do you know, prime the offer I made to lurker also applies to you. If you think you have better information than me, or my sources, let’s have a live debate. Why do you people keep running? Even our leftist politicians will not have a debate. This is a trend.
Trump got fake impeached twice on literally zero evidence and not only words there’s zero evidence, they had to alter what evidence they supposedly had to lie to the American people and just like now you and Lurker, and whoever else buys into this shit went right along with it just like you do now.
And before you correct me on my spelling on my grammar, I’m driving using voice to text.
Hahahaha “live debate”
You’ve have been told over and over why no one is wasting time debating a retard. Yet you are too stupid to understand simple English.
-
Ok red hats, go ahead and post your excuses now on why the impeachment won’t come to bear the fruit of your desperate, futile, self loathing dreams.
-
Do you know, prime the offer I made to lurker also applies to you. If you think you have better information than me, or my sources, let’s have a live debate. Why do you people keep running? Even our leftist politicians will not have a debate. This is a trend.
Trump got fake impeached twice on literally zero evidence and not only words there’s zero evidence, they had to alter what evidence they supposedly had to lie to the American people and just like now you and Lurker, and whoever else buys into this shit went right along with it just like you do now.
And before you correct me on my spelling on my grammar, I’m driving using voice to text.
what's the point of a debate? what does it actually do?
-
what's the point of a debate? what does it actually do?
Especially when he is too stupid to debate. He can’t articulate or post factual information here in a thread when he has plenty of time to research it first.
-
Wrong? Since Trump came down that escalator you’ve bought into literally every made up, lie, “smoking gun” and allegations that’s been said or written only to have almost every one debunked starting with “Russian Collusion” which was also been proved a lie.
You think there isn’t a two tiered justice system and all everything that’s happening isn’t election interference, you think going after Trump and anyone associated with him is normal. You actually think there is no corruption, fuck, you even think there’s no evidence against Biden and his crackhead kid.
Here’s a question for you. If you don’t know what corruption looks like, how do we know you weren’t a corrupt cop? If you want to know what corruption looks like where you served, look no farther then watching Austin go to shit from it.
LETS FUCKING GO Agnostic.
A straw man argument, sometimes called a straw person argument or spelled strawman argument, is the logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against that extreme version. In creating a straw man argument, the arguer strips the opposing point of view of any nuance and often misrepresents it in a negative light.
The straw man fallacy is an informal fallacy, which means that the flaw lies with the arguer’s method of arguing rather than the flaws of the argument itself. The straw man fallacy avoids the opponent’s actual argument and instead argues against an inaccurate caricature of it. By doing this, the straw man fallacy is a fallacy of relevance,
Or is it...
Complex question. A complex question is a question that implicitly assumes something to be true by its construction, such as "Have you stopped beating your wife?" A question like this is fallacious only if the thing presumed true (in this case, that you beat your wife) has not been established.
-
A straw man argument, sometimes called a straw person argument or spelled strawman argument, is the logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against that extreme version. In creating a straw man argument, the arguer strips the opposing point of view of any nuance and often misrepresents it in a negative light.
The straw man fallacy is an informal fallacy, which means that the flaw lies with the arguer’s method of arguing rather than the flaws of the argument itself. The straw man fallacy avoids the opponent’s actual argument and instead argues against an inaccurate caricature of it. By doing this, the straw man fallacy is a fallacy of relevance,
Or is it...
Complex question. A complex question is a question that implicitly assumes something to be true by its construction, such as "Have you stopped beating your wife?" A question like this is fallacious only if the thing presumed true (in this case, that you beat your wife) has not been established.
You literally said a lot of nothing
-
You literally said a lot of nothing
If you read between the lines, I said you are clueless about debating. I should have spelled it out.
-
McQarthy - Knows there is nothing there but is desperate to hold on to speakership. I'd love to ask him, why would you want to subject yourself to this shit? If the crazies don't replace him, the house will likely flip in two years and he's out anyway. He really is spineless.
-
[Sen. Tuberville: 'Shocked' Over Scale of Evidence on Biden/i]
Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., said Wednesday he is "absolutely shocked" by the amount of evidence House Republicans have gathered in their investigation of alleged criminal activity involving President Joe Biden and members of his family.
Tuberville said in a video posted on his X account he met with Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, to review evidence they have gathered in their investigations.
"For the first time here in the Senate, most of us just sat down and listened as they laid out the case against President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden," Tuberville said. "You know, I am absolutely shocked by the scale of the allegations and the strength of the evidence.
"We ought to be ashamed. Our media ought to be ashamed. Our institutions should be ashamed of what has gone on for the last four years without being investigated."
Tuberville, who has shown his distaste for impeachments given what happened during the two Senate trials involving former President Donald Trump, commended House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., for announcing Tuesday the launch of an impeachment inquiry into the president.
"I commend Speaker McCarthy for moving forward with an impeachment inquiry," Tuberville said. "You know, I don't like impeachments – it holds back our country. But in this case, it needs to happen. The American people deserve the truth."
On Tuesday, Tuberville was a bit more skeptical on the impeachment inquiry, telling "Meet the Press NOW," "What I've heard is there's a lot of fire and a lot of smoke, but we don't know whether there's any truth to it."
"I'm not for impeachment unless it is ironclad, as I said about [former] President Trump," Tuberville said. "If you're going to go after a former president or president, let's don't waste time. Let's know the truth. Let's be able to bring it out. Let the American people know. We've got enough problems up here right now without going through an impeachment process."
Tuberville said Tuesday even if the House sends articles of impeachment to the Senate for a trial, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., might not act on it. But only once in U.S. history has no trial been held after the House delivered articles of impeachment – in 1873, when Kansas U.S. District Court Judge Mark Delahay resigned before the trial after being impeached over allegations of alcoholism.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/tommy-tuberville-impeachment-inquiry-house/2023/09/13/id/1134357/
-
3 whiny libcucks, see how they run.. you know who you are lolololol.
-
McQuarthy!!! LOL.
Hypocrits are usually the dumbest people around. Not just on this board either.
-
McQuarthy!!! LOL.
Hypocrits are usually the dumbest people around. Not just on this board either.
He legally and constitutionally doesn’t need a vote. Cry more..
-
Biden is funneling money to Ukraine because they gave him and his dirtbag son tens of millions of dollars. Tons of young men are dying needlessly as a result.
-
He legally and constitutionally doesn’t need a vote. Cry more..
I didn’t say he did need one Retard-O. Still haven’t mastered simple reading yet I see.
-
I didn’t say he did need one Retard-O. Still haven’t mastered simple reading yet I see.
I’m learning you need to really spell it out to Coach otherwise it goes over his head..
-
I’m learning you need to really spell it out to Coach otherwise it goes over his head..
Hee Hee. I saw what you did there.
-
Especially when he is too stupid to debate. He can’t articulate or post factual information here in a thread when he has plenty of time to research it first.
But, but... Don't you know that it is all the fault of voice to text. Add to this that Coach is undoubtably listening to a MAGA, rightwing, conspiracy theorist radio talk show or webcasters YouTube videos whilst driving around L.A. searching for expensive gasoline so he can photograph the station's billboard and post it on Getbig as proof of Biden's failed economy.
I imagine the debate he is continuously trying to engage someone in to having with him will have ground rules to include the location of the debate must me in each debater's vehicle and be video captured on a mobile phone which is taped to the dash or headliner.
I've concluded that his wife has banned Getbig communications from home which is why he is always driving around and talking into his mobile phone. Otherwise, why not use a keyboard where he can edit his work, so he doesn't come off looking like a dumb shit so often.
It is also possible Coach learned from the Hunter Biden fiasco that it is a horrible idea to use your laptop to communicate on the internet because it may need to be repaired at some point. Then the shop technician would understandingly peg him as a nutcase, insurrectionist, and traitor. Thereby he or she turns his laptop over to the FBI as proof. Never fear though, if Trump is elected in 2024, he will make sure his prime MAGA supporter, Coach is pardoned of all crimes... or at least that is what Trump will promise him on Truth Social... but likely never follow through on unless he gets a hefty donation from Coach to whatever campaign/grift he is running at the time.
-
Wow…three attacks in row by the usual suspects….that when you know I’m doing some right 😂
-
Wow…three attacks in row by the usual suspects….that when you know I’m doing some right 😂
Wow... three attacks in a row. You realize that you are almost a celebrity now. You must be doing something right. Keep up the good work. ;D
-
Wow…three attacks in row by the usual suspects….that when you know I’m doing some right 😂
The Getbig hat trick! I'll send you a patch for your jacket. LOL.
-
Wow…three attacks in row by the usual suspects….that when you know I’m doing some right 😂
Yes Coach, you are special... you keep doing you... don't let anything change you or your mind... You got this
-
But, but... Don't you know that it is all the fault of voice to text. Add to this that Coach is undoubtably listening to a MAGA, rightwing, conspiracy theorist radio talk show or webcasters YouTube videos whilst driving around L.A. searching for expensive gasoline so he can photograph the station's billboard and post it on Getbig as proof of Biden's failed economy.
I imagine the debate he is continuously trying to engage someone in to having with him will have ground rules to include the location of the debate must me in each debater's vehicle and be video captured on a mobile phone which is taped to the dash or headliner.
I've concluded that his wife has banned Getbig communications from home which is why he is always driving around and talking into his mobile phone. Otherwise, why not use a keyboard where he can edit his work, so he doesn't come off looking like a dumb shit so often.
It is also possible Coach learned from the Hunter Biden fiasco that it is a horrible idea to use your laptop to communicate on the internet because it may need to be repaired at some point. Then the shop technician would understandingly peg him as a nutcase, insurrectionist, and traitor. Thereby he or she turns his laptop over to the FBI as proof. Never fear though, if Trump is elected in 2024, he will make sure his prime MAGA supporter, Coach is pardoned of all crimes... or at least that is what Trump will promise him on Truth Social... but likely never follow through on unless he gets a hefty donation from Coach to whatever campaign/grift he is running at the time.
Hahahaha
GOLD!!!
-
Wow…three attacks in row by the usual suspects….that when you know I’m doing some right 😂
Three truths in a row. You must be doing something retarded right now.
There is a reason the other Trumpturds on here don’t come on your dumb ass threads to help you out the majority of times you know. Even they don’t want anything to do with the bullshit you post.
-
Three truths in a row. You must be doing something retarded right now.
There is a reason the other Trumpturds on here don’t come on your dumb ass threads to help you out the majority of times you know. Even they don’t want anything to do with the bullshit you post.
As usual you are wrong, he needs no help with a self loathing low IQ bitch like you, the infamous dicketive and prime ::)
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/conservatives-praise-mccarthy-for-grilling-reporter-until-she-admits-gop-has-evidence-of-biden-wrongdoing
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/conservatives-praise-mccarthy-for-grilling-reporter-until-she-admits-gop-has-evidence-of-biden-wrongdoing
The liberal queer Team Blue Cultists just ignore the evidence that is overwhelming.
-
CNN just listed a week’s worth of Biden lies.
C N N
The media have their marching orders - he will not be the candidate I would guess.
Tide had changed he's done - Stick a fork in him.
let's see waht his arse licking cock sucking Libtardia supporters
have to say. ;D
-
The liberal queer Team Blue Cultists just ignore the evidence that is overwhelming.
“There is no evidence” - Lurker, Prime, Agnostic
-
“There is no evidence” - Lurker, Prime, Agnostic
Millions of dollars wired to all these family members via LLC's from foreign companies and people and nothing to see here! Testimony from the business partners who say biden was on the call, etc.
Biden on tape bragging about getting the prosecutor fired who was investigating Hunter.
Yeah no evidence.
-
“There is no evidence” - Lurker, Prime, Agnostic
“Debunked” - Qoach47
-
Pedo Biden is the 2nd coming of Jesus to a few.
See No Evil
Hear No Evil
Speak no Evil
is the mantra of those afflicted by the Libtardia ::)
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/conservatives-praise-mccarthy-for-grilling-reporter-until-she-admits-gop-has-evidence-of-biden-wrongdoing
McCarthy then went through a list of instances that many have characterized as possible evidence of wrongdoing from the president.
Listen to the video and read the transcript. She responded, "That's what the testimony says." Is this admitting the GOP has evidence of Biden wrongdoing?
To repeat, 'possible evidence' This can also mean it is not possible evidence of Biden wrongdoing.
But typically, you and some other folks only hear, read and interpret what complies with your agenda.
-
Pedo Biden is the 2nd coming of Jesus to a few.
See No Evil
Hear No Evil
Speak no Evil
is the mantra of those afflicted by the Libtardia
::)
-
McCarthy then went through a list of instances that many have characterized as possible evidence of wrongdoing from the president.
Listen to the video and read the transcript. She responded, "That's what the testimony says." Is this admitting the GOP has evidence of Biden wrongdoing?
To repeat, 'possible evidence' This can also mean it is not possible evidence of Biden wrongdoing.
But typically, you and some other folks only hear, read and interpret what complies with your agenda.
Hey dippy, there wouldn’t be an inquiry if there was no evidence. This is isn’t Pelosi’s gavel anymore where you put forth an impeachment with no evidence
-
Hey dippy, there wouldn’t be an inquiry if there was no evidence. This is isn’t Pelosi’s gavel anymore where you put forth an impeachment with no evidence
Yeah, and there wouldn't be four indictments and 91 felony charges if there was no evidence either. :D
-
Hey dippy, there wouldn’t be an inquiry if there was no evidence. This is isn’t Pelosi’s gavel anymore where you put forth an impeachment with no evidence
Not going to argue with you about whether there was evidence or not because Trump was impeached - twice. At least Pelosi had the vote. McCarthy does not. What is your game plan when Biden doesn't get impeached?
-
Not going to argue with you about whether there was evidence or not because Trump was impeached - twice. At least Pelosi had the vote. McCarthy does not. What is your game plan when Biden doesn't get impeached?
McQarthy just bending over for the red hats so they don't try to oust him with a vote. He knows he doesn't have the votes to do this. Thing is, he really doesn't care. It's all for show and to appease the Gaetz and MTGs of his party. Even some in his own party know it's all bullshit.
---
Colorado Representative Ken Buck, a member of the hyper-conservative House Freedom Caucus, recently told Jen Psaki that there is currently no evidence against President Joe Biden that would warrant impeachment, let alone an "inquiry."
---
and
---
"Time for impeachment is the time when there's evidence linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor."
He continued: "That doesn't exist right now."
Buck also rebuked Georgia Representative and former member of the Freedom Caucus Marjorie Taylor Greene's obsession with impeaching Biden. "Marjorie filed impeachment articles of impeachment on President Biden before he was sworn into office more than two and a half years ago. The idea that she is now the expert on impeachment or that she is someone who should set the timing on impeachment is absurd."
---
-
Yeah, and there wouldn't be four indictments and 91 felony charges if there was no evidence either. :D
Sure there would. “You can indict a ham sandwich” - Chuck Schumer
-
Not going to argue with you about whether there was evidence or not because Trump was impeached - twice. At least Pelosi had the vote. McCarthy does not. What is your game plan when Biden doesn't get impeached?
Remind us how that trial turned out lol
-
McQarthy just bending over for the red hats so they don't try to oust him with a vote. He knows he doesn't have the votes to do this. Thing is, he really doesn't care. It's all for show and to appease the Gaetz and MTGs of his party. Even some in his own party know it's all bullshit.
---
Colorado Representative Ken Buck, a member of the hyper-conservative House Freedom Caucus, recently told Jen Psaki that there is currently no evidence against President Joe Biden that would warrant impeachment, let alone an "inquiry."
---
and
---
"Time for impeachment is the time when there's evidence linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor."
He continued: "That doesn't exist right now."
Buck also rebuked Georgia Representative and former member of the Freedom Caucus Marjorie Taylor Greene's obsession with impeaching Biden. "Marjorie filed impeachment articles of impeachment on President Biden before he was sworn into office more than two and a half years ago. The idea that she is now the expert on impeachment or that she is someone who should set the timing on impeachment is absurd."
---
Actually what Buck said was he was going into look at the evidence that he hasn’t seen. You know, like the bank records, emails, texts, whistleblowers testimonies, the affidavits, etc
But according to you and the ones that brainwash you, “there is no evidence” hahahahah
-
Here’s All The Evidence Connecting Joe Biden To Hunter Biden’s Foreign Business Dealings
And you can bet they’ll be a hell of a lot more during the inquiry
https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/17/evidence-joe-biden-hunter-business-dealings/
-
Here’s All The Evidence Connecting Joe Biden To Hunter Biden’s Foreign Business Dealings
And you can bet they’ll be a hell of a lot more during the inquiry
https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/17/evidence-joe-biden-hunter-business-dealings/
ok....
-
Sure there would. “You can indict a ham sandwich” - Chuck Schumer
Now apply that to your previous posting. ::)
It takes a low intellect person to box themselves in with their own words. Which is no surprise that you do it over and over.
-
Actually what Buck said was he was going into look at the evidence that he hasn’t seen. You know, like the bank records, emails, texts, whistleblowers testimonies, the affidavits, etc
But according to you and the ones that brainwash you, “there is no evidence” hahahahah
He said exactly what is listed in the quote above. If you claim he didn't you are either a liar, extremely stupid, or both.
"Time for impeachment is the time when there's evidence linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor."
He continued: "That doesn't exist right now."
Buck also rebuked Georgia Representative and former member of the Freedom Caucus Marjorie Taylor Greene's obsession with impeaching Biden. "Marjorie filed impeachment articles of impeachment on President Biden before he was sworn into office more than two and a half years ago. The idea that she is now the expert on impeachment or that she is someone who should set the timing on impeachment is absurd."
-
ok....
Actually it is :
hahahaha
"ok"
-
He said exactly what is listed in the quote above. If you claim he didn't you are either a liar, extremely stupid, or both.
"Time for impeachment is the time when there's evidence linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor."
He continued: "That doesn't exist right now."
Buck also rebuked Georgia Representative and former member of the Freedom Caucus Marjorie Taylor Greene's obsession with impeaching Biden. "Marjorie filed impeachment articles of impeachment on President Biden before he was sworn into office more than two and a half years ago. The idea that she is now the expert on impeachment or that she is someone who should set the timing on impeachment is absurd."
Yeah…since you didn’t watch his interview last week on Newsmax you wouldn’t know.
-
ok....
Ok is right
-
Yeah…since you didn’t watch his interview last week on Newsmax you wouldn’t know.
Are you really disputing what he said in the quote I posted? It doesn't matter what he said somewhere else. Are you really saying that Ken did not utter those words that I posted? ::)
-
Are you really disputing what he said in the quote I posted? It doesn't matter what he said somewhere else. Are you really saying that Ken did not utter those words that I posted? ::)
I’m saying you don’t keep up with shit.
-
I’m saying you don’t keep up with shit.
Again, you don't want to stand by your own words.
-
Again, you don't want to stand by your own words.
He got owned again, but you watch.. he will spin it in Coaches famous ability to detach himself from reality. I swear, I feel like I need to check my emails daily for "Leave Coach alone!" emails from the Special Olympics. And honestly, if I got one, I would. I have the utmost respect for those struggling with disabilities. But Coach hasn't yet declared an issue so I assume all is fair. But if at any time Coach comes forward with " Well, I'm not retarded but I did get held back 3 times" or something along those lines I will absolutely back off. Hell, I've been considering it anyways because it's pretty obvious. But then I struggle with the "They want to be treated the same as you and I, they don't want special favors" and I keep pointing out his flaws. It's a tough call.
-
He got owned again, but you watch.. he will spin it in Coaches famous ability to detach himself from reality. I swear, I feel like I need to check my emails daily for "Leave Coach alone!" emails from the Special Olympics. And honestly, if I got one, I would. I have the utmost respect for those struggling with disabilities. But Coach hasn't yet declared an issue so I assume all is fair. But if at any time Coach comes forward with " Well, I'm not retarded but I did get held back 3 times" or something along those lines I will absolutely back off. Hell, I've been considering it anyways because it's pretty obvious. But then I struggle with the "They want to be treated the same as you and I, they don't want special favors" and I keep pointing out his flaws. It's a tough call.
You ran once, it’s not surprising you’d run again from a debate.
-
You ran once, it’s not surprising you’d run again from a debate.
Coach, you keep mentioning how you want to debate others. Why not make a youtube channel and start doing debates there to engage with people or do a collab and appear on one of the many political commentators' channels like Bongino or Shapiro as a pundit?
-
You ran once, it’s not surprising you’d run again from a debate.
No one is running from debating a retarded geriatric. No one is just not wasting their time doing so. There is nothing about you that anyone takes believes lends any credible to your posts here and a "debate" (hahaha) would only be more of the same with you lying, making up shit, denying facts, and speaking in click bait sound bites.
-
Coach, you keep mentioning how you want to debate others. Why not make a youtube channel and start doing debates there to engage with people or do a collab and appear on one of the many political commentators' channels like Bongino or Shapiro as a pundit?
Hahahaah. What a great idea. So we could share with more people who are not GetBig members and let them get a Daily Dose Of Our Own Retarded Jellyfish Brain from here.
-
Coach, you keep mentioning how you want to debate others. Why not make a youtube channel and start doing debates there to engage with people or do a collab and appear on one of the many political commentators' channels like Bongino or Shapiro as a pundit?
I don’t have time to create a YouTube channel. Zoom is much more efficient. Besides, I already have one that I’ve barely posted too.
-
“House Republicans Set Date for First Biden Impeachment Hearing“
The U.S. House of Representatives is going to hold its first impeachment inquiry hearing this month, the House Oversight committee confirmed on Sept. 19.
The first hearing will take place on Thursday, Sept. 28, a spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee told The Epoch Times on Tuesday morning.
The hearing will focus on constitutional and legal questions surrounding the President’s involvement in corruption and abuse of public office,” the spokesperson said. “The Committee also intends to subpoena Hunter and James Biden’s personal and business bank records as early as this week. The Oversight Committee will continue to follow the evidence and money trail to provide the transparency and accountability that Americans demand from their government.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) recently announced the lower chamber would be investigating President Joe Biden, with a focus on his involvement in the business dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, and brother, James Biden.
“House Republicans have uncovered serious and credible allegations into President Biden’s conduct. Taken together these allegations paint a picture of a culture of corruption,” Mr. McCarthy said in prepared remarks from Washington.
Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, is helping lead the probe.
Ian Sams, a White House spokesman, said that Republicans have already been investigating the president and have “turned up no evidence of wrongdoing.”
Mr. Comer and other Republicans have found that the president spoke repeatedly to business partners of Mr. Biden, including at dinners at Washington’s Cafe Milano. They also confirmed that President Biden sent emails under pseudonyms while vice president, including accounts that corresponded with Mr. Biden.
Mr. Biden, other Biden family members, and associates received more than $21 million, primarily from foreigners, while President Biden was vice president.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the House can bring charges of impeachment against the president or another official. A simple majority impeaches the official.
The Senate then considers the charges in an impeachment trial.
Former President Donald Trump was impeached twice, but was acquitted both times.
Mark Tapscott contributed to this report.