https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66831593
I’d imagine where there’s smoke there is some fire, but do you think any of this coming out now has anything to do with his outspoken attitude against certain ideologies?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66831593100% why they are coming after him. We need special forces teams to take out the regressive leftist elites!
I’d imagine where there’s smoke there is some fire, but do you think any of this coming out now has anything to do with his outspoken attitude against certain ideologies?
100% why they are coming after him. We need special forces teams to take out the regressive leftist elites!
https://www.rt.com/news/583070-russell-brand-sexual-assault-allegations/
Responding to Brand’s video on X (formerly Twitter), Elon Musk wrote: “Of course. They don’t like competition.”
Elsewhere in the video clip, Brand noted what he called “coordinated media attacks” against outspoken figures online such as Joe Rogan “when he dared to take a medicine that the mainstream media didn’t approve of.” Rogan said in 2021 that he was taking the deworming drug ivermectin to treat Covid-19.
His YouTube channel …
Yep, they’re going after him.
He is highly intelligent, outspoken and fully aware what’s happening.
And his platform is much too successful.
His YouTube channel …
Yep, they’re going after him.
He is highly intelligent, outspoken and fully aware what’s happening.
And his platform is much too successful.
Outspoken yes, intelligent no. He's a prime example of articulate being mistaken for intelligent.
I've never liked the guy, moreso now he a tin-foil hat wearing type,
I was not surprised by these sort of allegations, As Phantom Spunker says he was a wild one back in his youngest junkie days, and had a bit of an unconventional childhood. (If I recall correctly he lost his virginity in Thailand to a prostitute his dad treated him to).
As usual with these things though, it's unfair to him that this is splashed over the news when it's just allegations.
We don't know shit but
I hope he ends up
1: fully exonerated
2: suing everyone, especially msm organizations.
In general, what's the deal with allegations about shit that supposedly happened decades ago, there's no police reports or anything to corroborate it, and now it's on you to prove it's false?
Orville Reddenbacher kicked my grandma's poodle at an I-80 rest stop in 1963. She was too traumatized to file a police report. To this day, the Reddenbacher family refuses to acknowledge the monstrous actions of the popcorn patriarch. The world deserves to know! Generational injustice!
One woman alleges that Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day. The Times says it has seen medical records to support this
Outspoken yes, intelligent no. He's a prime example of articulate being mistaken for intelligent.
I've never liked the guy, moreso now he a tin-foil hat wearing type,
I was not surprised by these sort of allegations, As Phantom Spunker says he was a wild one back in his youngest junkie days, and had a bit of an unconventional childhood. (If I recall correctly he lost his virginity in Thailand to a prostitute his dad treated him to).
As usual with these things though, it's unfair to him that this is splashed over the news when it's just allegations.
I don't watch him, but I'm aware he's successfully rebranded himself as some sort of social commentator/self-help guru. However, these sexual assault allegations have been around for years; they aren't new.
When he was younger, he was a true degenerate: wanking off men in toilets. Walking into shops and pissing himself on film. Ringing up a pensioner on live radio and telling him that he fucked his granddaughter. I doubt there's much that a drug-addicted Russell Brand wouldn't have done. While it seems quite likely that media figures have gone after him because he's pissed them off, I wouldn't be so quick to assume his innocence before looking at what's been said.
I don't watch him, but I'm aware he's successfully rebranded himself as some sort of social commentator/self-help guru. However, these sexual assault allegations have been around for years; they aren't new.
When he was younger, he was a true degenerate: wanking off men in toilets. Walking into shops and pissing himself on film. Ringing up a pensioner on radio and telling him that he fucked his granddaughter. I doubt there's much that a drug-addicted Russell Brand wouldn't have done. While it seems quite likely that media figures have gone after him because he's pissed them off, I wouldn't be so quick to assume his innocence before looking at what's been said.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66831593Yep, Andrew Tate now Brand
I’d imagine where there’s smoke there is some fire, but do you think any of this coming out now has anything to do with his outspoken attitude against certain ideologies?
His YouTube channel …
Yep, they’re going after him.
He is highly intelligent, outspoken and fully aware what’s happening.
And his platform is much too successful.
How’s this for corroboration?
Whatever the truth may be, I hope that justice is served.
I don't watch him, but I'm aware he's successfully rebranded himself as some sort of social commentator/self-help guru. However, these sexual assault allegations have been around for years; they aren't new.
When he was younger, he was a true degenerate: wanking off men in toilets. Walking into shops and pissing himself on film. Ringing up a pensioner on radio and telling him that he fucked his granddaughter. I doubt there's much that a drug-addicted Russell Brand wouldn't have done. While it seems quite likely that media figures have gone after him because he's pissed them off, I wouldn't be so quick to assume his innocence before looking at what's been said.
I’m not saying it’s not true but when I hear about a woman supposedly getting raped at the guy’s house particularly in the case of a celebrity, I get suspicious.
Did he kidnap her and bring her there?
How’s this for corroboration?
We saw it. We saw it all. It's legit as.
Source: Trust me bro.
Four women are alleging sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013.
I don't watch him, but I'm aware he's successfully rebranded himself as some sort of social commentator/self-help guru. However, these sexual assault allegations have been around for years; they aren't new.
When he was younger, he was a true degenerate: wanking off men in toilets. Walking into shops and pissing himself on film. Ringing up a pensioner on radio and telling him that he fucked his granddaughter. I doubt there's much that a drug-addicted Russell Brand wouldn't have done. While it seems quite likely that media figures have gone after him because he's pissed them off, I wouldn't be so quick to assume his innocence before looking at what's been said.
Sounds like getbiggers
He’s a degenerate fucktard
Fuck him
Maybe he invited her over?
If she accepts she is obligated to have sex.
Every time this happens,you post the same type of comment.
Like with Danny Masterson.
"Guy looks like a rapist. Fuck him".
I hope they don't come after you one day. German leftist scum.
From what I know his fame big time came after he got clean. Says a lot for how well he got clean if he's managed to stay sober after all this time in celebrity world. I have a feeling he substituted drugs for sex but 2003 onwards he was supposedly clean. Only he knows whether he was clean. I don't believe these allegations. I think he is anti establishment so some wef guy hired private detectives to find ex girlfriends and dalliance women to accuse him and package it to channel 4
Did you read The Times article I linked? The Sunday Times, The Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches are serious media outlets that are not likely to risk running a story like this if it can get them sued:And it's just coincidental that 4 women are stepping forward at the same time, well over a decade after and with the media knowing for "years"?
Over the past few years, reporters have interviewed hundreds of sources who knew or worked with Brand: ex-girlfriends and their friends and family, comedians and other celebrities, people who worked with him on radio and TV, and senior staff at the BBC, Channel 4 and other media organisations.
Along with these interviews reporters have seen private emails and text messages, submitted freedom of information requests, viewed medical and therapists’ notes, scrutinised Brand’s books and interviews, and watched and listened to hundreds of hours of his shows on the BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube to corroborate allegations.
We all know that plenty of women make up bullshit allegations for various reasons. And it may well be that the motivation for them to speak out now is, at least in part, financial. However, Brand literally admitted to raping one of the women and apologized to her via text message, which has been confirmed as coming from his own phone.
It's very easy for people to now claim that "The Establishment" is coming for them because they've heroically stuck their head above the parapet and spoke truth to power. In some cases this is obviously true (e.g. Assange), and in other cases, it is quite clearly nonsense. I don't watch enough of Brand to know if there's any potential for that to be the case here. Is it possible? Sure. States collect information on people to be used as coercion all the time. As do media platforms. It's more likely that the British media wants to avoid a repeat of the Savile scandal, so they are now throwing everyone under the bus when it looks as though a story might get leaked and they appear to have been culpable in enabling the culture in which it happened.
As mentioned, these allegations have been around for years and he's been quite successful in silencing them before through injunctions. He's clearly narcissistic, reasonably intelligent, and calculating. It was a smart move to try and get ahead of the allegations and control the narrative, but it really doesn't look as though he's the innocent victim of a baseless smear campaign.
And it's just coincidental that 4 women are stepping forward at the same time, well over a decade after and with the media knowing for "years"?
If you got a link to that big bolded part, I'd love to see it.
Fuck him and fuck you, too
-Eminem
The investigation is a joint Chanel 4 (Uk) and Times newspaper project.
The Times & the Sunday Times is part of News Corp ( Wall St Journal .New York Post related to Fox News via Rupert Murdock)
It is highly probable that if this guy did not broadcast
the majority of regular getbig posters would be queueing up to condemn him as a woke pedo pervert
No, let me reiterate, I don't think it's coincidental. This is clearly an organized, planned, and well-executed investigation. I'm just saying, it also looks like at least some of it appears to be grounded in truth. He was a drug-crazed, sex-addicted ego maniac—no doubt he has his demons.
The screen shots from the actual text messages are in here, along with a timeline of the events: https://archive.ph/KX4zn#selection-1077.0-1081.325
"I'm very sorry. You don't need to get tested. I will make this up to you somehow with live [sic] and kindness. Not my original idea which was more sex. You've been lovely to me and I'm embarrassed by my behavior. Sorry. X"
What kind of mother drives her 16 year old daughter to be with a 30 year old man?
This bothers me.
I make a distinction between some chick banging a celebrity and then later deciding she was raped after he kicked her to the curb, and some guy jumping out of the bushes and attacking a woman.
You traitor pussy fag shit eater scumbag
So is he facing charges or just being smeared in the public eye ???
Fick ihn und fick dich auch :D
Du bist 40 Jahre alt und fuhlst dich beschissen, wahrscheinlich stirbst du bald
Not interested in waiting for more info or facts? Just planting your flag on it's the liberals fault? That doesn't seem fair to the accusers, no?
what election are you talking about?
Outspoken yes, intelligent no. He's a prime example of articulate being mistaken for intelligent.
I've never liked the guy, moreso now he a tin-foil hat wearing type,
I was not surprised by these sort of allegations, As Phantom Spunker says he was a wild one back in his youngest junkie days, and had a bit of an unconventional childhood. (If I recall correctly he lost his virginity in Thailand to a prostitute his dad treated him to).
As usual with these things though, it's unfair to him that this is splashed over the news when it's just allegations.
Mr Brand is from and works in the UK.
Chanel 4 and the Times / Sunday Times are UK companies
The accusers are in the UK
The alleged events took place in the UK
The Conservative party has been the government party for the past 13 years in the UK
Mr Brand is from and works in the UK.
Chanel 4 and the Times / Sunday Times are UK companies
The accusers are in the UK
The alleged events took place in the UK
The Conservative party has been the government party for the past 13 years in the UK
Yes.RIP him
This shit is getting crazy. Any ex girlfriend, co worker, or just any random chick can claim you raped her 20 years ago. At the least your reputation is ruined, at worst you go to prison for life. I'm really starting to hate this society.This is the most worrisome part. Imagine some broad from 20+ years ago just pops up claiming you sexually assaulted her, what is her proof? Why does a man have to prove his innocence?
Mr Brand is from and works in the UK.
Chanel 4 and the Times / Sunday Times are UK companies
The accusers are in the UK
The alleged events took place in the UK
The Conservative party has been the government party for the past 13 years in the UK
RIP himAnd why does most of society side with the woman on her stories? "A woman would never lie." ::)
This is the most worrisome part. Imagine some broad from 20+ years ago just pops up claiming you sexually assaulted her, what is her proof? Why does a man have to prove his innocence?
Did you read The Times article I linked? The Sunday Times, The Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches are serious media outlets that are not likely to risk running a story like this if it can get them sued:
Over the past few years, reporters have interviewed hundreds of sources who knew or worked with Brand: ex-girlfriends and their friends and family, comedians and other celebrities, people who worked with him on radio and TV, and senior staff at the BBC, Channel 4 and other media organisations.
Along with these interviews reporters have seen private emails and text messages, submitted freedom of information requests, viewed medical and therapists’ notes, scrutinised Brand’s books and interviews, and watched and listened to hundreds of hours of his shows on the BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube to corroborate allegations.
We all know that plenty of women make up bullshit allegations for various reasons. And it may well be that the motivation for them to speak out now is, at least in part, financial. However, Brand literally admitted to raping one of the women and apologized to her via text message, which has been confirmed as coming from his own phone.
It's very easy for people to now claim that "The Establishment" is coming for them because they've heroically stuck their head above the parapet and spoke truth to power. In some cases this is obviously true (e.g. Assange), and in other cases, it is quite clearly nonsense. I don't watch enough of Brand to know if there's any potential for that to be the case here. Is it possible? Sure. States collect information on people to be used as coercion all the time. As do media platforms. It's more likely that the British media wants to avoid a repeat of the Savile scandal, so they are now throwing everyone under the bus when it looks as though a story might get leaked and they appear to have been culpable in enabling the culture in which it happened.
As mentioned, these allegations have been around for years and he's been quite successful in silencing them before through injunctions. He's clearly narcissistic, reasonably intelligent, and calculating. It was a smart move to try and get ahead of the allegations and control the narrative, but it really doesn't look as though he's the innocent victim of a baseless smear campaign.
And why does most of society side with the woman on her stories? "A woman would never lie." ::)
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/19/youtube-suspends-russell-brand-revenues-channel (https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/19/youtube-suspends-russell-brand-revenues-channel)
YouTube has suspended Russell Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform after allegations of rape and sexual assault in a massive hit to his finances.
....
Brand had prepared for this eventuality by moving many of his videos across to the rival site Rumble, although its a relatively niche outlet that does not give Brand access to the 6.5 million subscribers he has built up during a decade on YouTube.
RIP him
This is the most worrisome part. Imagine some broad from 20+ years ago just pops up claiming you sexually assaulted her, what is her proof? Why does a man have to prove his innocence?
Damn
Seems like both Brand and Masterson are DONE
Because that angle affords them the right to righteously bully. We haven't evolved, we're just Salem with internet. The worst are the historically bullied. Anybody with half a shred of sense can see that the trans community have turned into some of the worst bullies around, the very thing they originally fought against."Salem with internet." Great point.
However..
I doubt there is anyone reading this thread who hasn't known a person who in the past, by today's standards would have been guilty of sexual assault and a decent amount of it. I would go as far as to say that it might be one of the most common crimes being committed. Particularly unpunished crime. The threat is real for women and the better looking they are, the more it surrounds them and defines their entire life. Of course, some women are also batshit crazy so there is very real threat of giving them this power but it's not really that much different from the fact that there is batshit men going around raping, groping and getting away with it. It's all the same shit and the only thing we the sane can do is stay away from anybody who radiates crazy.
Masterson's wife just filed for divorce by the way. Could be a benign reason of course but it's not exactly a vote of confidence is it.
Brant and Mastodon are TOAST! Some time it do be like that.(https://media.tenor.com/S77l5PemP14AAAAC/slow-mo-ass.gif)
IT DO!she no kang
GON GET MY HAIR DID
BUILT DIFFRENT ETC
WE THE PEOPLE
WE WUZ KANGZ
she no kang
she a queeeeenn
(https://scontent.fbma6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/380490761_278574265023756_5010210845175246269_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p843x403&_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5614bc&_nc_ohc=E8TuykZErv4AX_-eKyU&_nc_ht=scontent.fbma6-1.fna&oh=00_AfCf52t0rWVHhz_xb18C8xBA12qSYJOkeyxZJyfmGwi2dA&oe=651198AE)I'm so tired of these whores. Almost makes me want to join Islam.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/24/russell-brand-and-why-the-allegations-took-so-long-to-surface (https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/24/russell-brand-and-why-the-allegations-took-so-long-to-surface)
Others wondered why it had taken so long for the story to be published despite rumours swirling about Brand’s behaviour for years. In the Dispatches documentary Russell Brand: In Plain Sight, the comedian Daniel Sloss said he had heard “allegations and rumours” about Brand, while Deadline reported that Brand was dropped from Comedy Central’s Roast Battle in 2018 after another comedian, Katherine Ryan, repeatedly accused him of being a “sexual predator”.
The reason, according to multiple experts, is simple: publishing stories like this in England and Wales is extremely difficult, and fraught with risk.
“People often think that we have a law that protects free speech here. We don’t. We have a law that protects reputation,” says Caroline Kean, a partner at Wiggin
I'm impressed with Rumble's response to the UK Government's attempt to ban individuals from social media on the basis of unproven allegations. Never used the site, and it seems to be similar to YouTube in that it's full of dumbasses making their own terrible videos, but I've signed up and will support it now out of principle.
I am not following the details, so this isn't about him being guilty or innocent.
But Youtube demonetized him based on accusations.
Accusations.
That is just awful.
I'm impressed with Rumble's response to the UK Government's attempt to ban individuals from social media on the basis of unproven allegations. Never used the site, and it seems to be similar to YouTube in that it's full of dumbasses making their own terrible videos, but I've signed up and will support it now out of principle.
I haven’t been following it either but what’s an appropriate threshold in your opinion? In the face of credible accusations + some corroborating evidence, it would be reasonable for a private company to demonetize one of their members.
Not saying that’s the case here, but there’s no need to wait until someone is found guilty in a court of law
I am not following the details, so this isn't about him being guilty or innocent.
But Youtube demonetized him based on accusations.
Accusations.
That is just awful.
I am not following the details, so this isn't about him being guilty or innocent.
But Youtube demonetized him based on accusations.
Accusations.
That is just awful.
Enjoy while you can. The Brand allegations will be leveraged to smear and ban Rumble. "Online Safety."
100% why they are coming after him. We need special forces teams to take out the regressive leftist elites!
https://www.rt.com/news/583070-russell-brand-sexual-assault-allegations/
Responding to Brand’s video on X (formerly Twitter), Elon Musk wrote: “Of course. They don’t like competition.”
Elsewhere in the video clip, Brand noted what he called “coordinated media attacks” against outspoken figures online such as Joe Rogan “when he dared to take a medicine that the mainstream media didn’t approve of.” Rogan said in 2021 that he was taking the deworming drug ivermectin to treat Covid-19.