Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on May 02, 2024, 10:43:01 AM
-
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6dylELOaOc/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
-
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6dylELOaOc/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
You just found out? This happened a year ago. What have the House Republicans done to that crook Pomerantz?
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/12/former-trump-prosecutor-pomerantz-refuses-to-answer-house-questions.html
-
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6dylELOaOc/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Check the date.
Former Trump prosecutor slams GOP ‘political theater,’ takes the Fifth at deposition
BY MYCHAEL SCHNELL - 05/12/23 4:18 PM ET
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4002288-former-trump-prosecutor-slams-gop-political-theater-takes-the-fifth-at-deposition/#:~:text=Pomerantz%20also%20outlined%20to%20lawmakers,material%20or%20violated%20confidentiality%20regulations.
-
You just found out? This happened a year ago. What have the House Republicans done to that crook Pomerantz?
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/12/former-trump-prosecutor-pomerantz-refuses-to-answer-house-questions.html
Yeah, I saw that Gaetz posted it this morning. Watched it and reposted it.Didnt realize it was from a year ago.
-
Yeah, I saw that Gaetz posted it this morning. Watched it and reposted it.Didnt realize it was from a year ago.
That's cool. We all make mistakes every now and then. One wonders why Gaetz posted it again today.
-
That's cool. We all make mistakes every now and then. One wonders why Gaetz posted it again today.
I’m sure as a reminder that this a corrupt Stalinist show trial and political persecution. Nothing more nothing less.
-
The smoking gun that wasn’t.
-
I’m sure as a reminder that this a corrupt Stalinist show trial and political persecution. Nothing more nothing less.
-
I’m sure as a reminder that this a corrupt Stalinist show trial and political persecution. Nothing more nothing less.
Isn't Gaetz still under investigation by the House Ethics Committee? He was recently subpoenaed as witness in a defamation and racketeering suit brought by Gaetz’s friend and former Florida state Rep. Chris Dorworth. Although he is neither a plaintiff nor a defendant in this case, it puts him in an untimely, negative spotlight. I could very well be that Gaetz’s repost of this stale issue is meant as a distraction or way to control the narrative. Gaetz has a ton of 'baggage' as does Trump whether it is justified or not.
.
-
Isn't Gaetz still under investigation by the House Ethics Committee? He was recently subpoenaed as witness in a defamation and racketeering suit brought by Gaetz’s friend and former Florida state Rep. Chris Dorworth. Although he is neither a plaintiff nor a defendant in this case, it puts him in an untimely, negative spotlight. I could very well be that Gaetz’s repost of this stale issue is meant as a distraction or way to control the narrative. Gaetz has a ton of 'baggage' as does Trump whether it is justified or not.
.
Trying to change the subject and avoid the topic at hand, as usual.
-
Isn't Gaetz still under investigation by the House Ethics Committee? He was recently subpoenaed as witness in a defamation and racketeering suit brought by Gaetz’s friend and former Florida state Rep. Chris Dorworth. Although he is neither a plaintiff nor a defendant in this case, it puts him in an untimely, negative spotlight. I could very well be that Gaetz’s repost of this stale issue is meant as a distraction or way to control the narrative. Gaetz has a ton of 'baggage' as does Trump whether it is justified or not.
.
Shitters under investigation too you caulk-commander... Fuck off...
-
absolutely
why would a media savvy politician resurrect a year old piece of news
Because it's relevant to Trump's ongoing criminal prosecutions.
-
Shitters under investigation too you caulk-commander... Fuck off...
I assume you mean President Biden since 'shitter' is how you always refer to him.
My question to you is who is investigating President Biden and why? I do not see anything on the House Oversight Committee's agenda supporting this. Check it out for yourself, https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/
The House Oversight Committee's last press release on the matter of the Biden investigation was on March 20, 2024. https://oversight.house.gov/?s=President+Biden+investigation
And there is this, 'Comer recently approached one of his Republican colleagues and made a blunt admission: He was ready to be “done with” the impeachment inquiry into Biden...' April 24, 2024. Comer's copout remarks were, "That's why I am preparing criminal referrals as the culmination of my investigation."
-
Isn't Gaetz still under investigation by the House Ethics Committee? He was recently subpoenaed as witness in a defamation and racketeering suit brought by Gaetz’s friend and former Florida state Rep. Chris Dorworth. Although he is neither a plaintiff nor a defendant in this case, it puts him in an untimely, negative spotlight. I could very well be that Gaetz’s repost of this stale issue is meant as a distraction or way to control the narrative. Gaetz has a ton of 'baggage' as does Trump whether it is justified or not.
.
The topic is about Pomerantz repeatedly pleading the fifth a year ago even to direct questions such as:
"Did you knowingly break any laws when investigating President Trump?"
"Did you break any laws when you worked at the Manhattan District Attorney's office?"
"Did you violate any person's constitutional rights when you worked on the Trump investigation?"
"Did you violate any person's constitutional rights while you worked at the Manhattan D.A.'s office?"
"Did you misuse any federal funds while investigating President Trump?"
"Did you misuse any federal funds while you were working at the Manhattan D.A.'s office?"
"Did you violate any New York State Bar rules while you were investigating President Trump?"
Here is the full video:
https://rumble.com/v4svo5r-mark-pomerantz-full-deposition.html
The real issue is, why did House Republicans do nothing to Pomerantz?
-
The topic is about Pomerantz repeatedly pleading the fifth a year ago even to direct questions such as:
"Did you knowingly break any laws when investigating President Trump?"
"Did you break any laws when you worked at the Manhattan District Attorney's office?"
"Did you violate any person's constitutional rights when you worked on the Trump investigation?"
"Did you violate any person's constitutional rights while you worked at the Manhattan D.A.'s office?"
"Did you misuse any federal funds while investigating President Trump?"
"Did you misuse any federal funds while you were working at the Manhattan D.A.'s office?"
"Did you violate any New York State Bar rules while you were investigating President Trump?"
Here is the full video:
https://rumble.com/v4svo5r-mark-pomerantz-full-deposition.html
The real issue is, why did House Republicans do nothing to Pomerantz?
Because they are spineless turds.
-
Shitters under investigation too you caulk-commander... Fuck off...
By whom and for what? Provide details or you are wrong.
-
"Pomerantz, who investigated Trump at the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, said he was appearing before the committee “as required” because “I respect the rule of law,” before issuing a sharp rebuke of the panel’s probe and disclosing his intent to plead the Fifth.
“What I do not respect is the use of the Committee’s subpoena power to compel me to participate in an act of political theater,” Pomerantz’s statement reads. “This deposition is for show. I do not believe for a moment that I am here to assist a genuine effort to enact legislation or conduct legislative ‘oversight.’”
“Fortunately, I do not have to cooperate with the cynical histrionics that this deposition represents,” it later adds. “Although the rule of law compels me to be here, it does not require that I play a substantive role in your theatrical production. Under the law, I can decline to answer your questions for several reasons.”"
In context, he answered no questions. He clearly felt the inquiry was a farce and did not want to participate. Skeletor asked why the Republicans didn't do anything about it. I suspect the answer is, they would rather leave that cow patty undisturbed. They know he was right.
-
By whom and for what? Provide details or you are wrong.
Fuck yourself retard...
Go guzzle some caulk-condiments...
-
Fuck yourself retard...
Go guzzle some caulk-condiments...
In other words, you don't know the answer to my question. -Figures.
-
I assume you mean President Biden since 'shitter' is how you always refer to him.
And here he is …………
https://x.com/NotFarLeftAtAll/status/1786778364491026487?t=6a8uM1N_QMMz4oO_azkSUw&s=08
-
And here he is …………
https://x.com/NotFarLeftAtAll/status/1786778364491026487?t=6a8uM1N_QMMz4oO_azkSUw&s=08
If you believe that video is real, you proved my point... and you are a gullible idiot.
-
I assume you mean President Biden since 'shitter' is how you always refer to him.
My question to you is who is investigating President Biden and why? I do not see anything on the House Oversight Committee's agenda supporting this. Check it out for yourself, https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/
The House Oversight Committee's last press release on the matter of the Biden investigation was on March 20, 2024. https://oversight.house.gov/?s=President+Biden+investigation
And there is this, 'Comer recently approached one of his Republican colleagues and made a blunt admission: He was ready to be “done with” the impeachment inquiry into Biden...' April 24, 2024. Comer's copout remarks were, "That's why I am preparing criminal referrals as the culmination of my investigation."
Did you really ask if Biden is under investigation? Are you shitting me?
-
All demturdz in Congress "cant remember" or plead the 5th.
Just lying corrupt kvnt traitor commiez. ::) ::)
Oh yeah, The Pimlico Pickle-Puffer is too busy swallowing man-gravy to know Shitters under investigation...
Disgusting retard...
-
Did you really ask if Biden is under investigation? Are you shitting me?
Nope. Answer the question with proof that President Biden is currently under a formal investigation including what the investigation about, so we can find out who is fooling who here.
Robert K. Hur’s report concluded there was not sufficient evidence to bring charges against President Biden.
Late last March, James Comer, House Oversight chair said that President Biden's impeachment is not going to happen. The are no hearings on the Oversight Committee's calendar having relating to President Biden. Here is a link to the House Oversite Committee's calendar. Notice that there nothing on it about an ongoing investigation of President Biden. https://oversight.house.gov/calendar/
-
Nope. Answer the question with proof that President Biden is currently under a formal investigation including what the investigation about, so we can find out who is fooling who here.
Robert K. Hur’s report concluded there was not sufficient evidence to bring charges against President Biden.
Late last March, James Comer, House Oversight chair said that President Biden's impeachment is not going to happen. The are no hearings on the Oversight Committee's calendar having relating to President Biden. Here is a link to the House Oversite Committee's calendar. Notice that there nothing on it about an ongoing investigation of President Biden. https://oversight.house.gov/calendar/
Hmm, it seems like Coach cannot produce an answer to this simple question that he can back up with proof. Think of that. ;D
-
Hmm, it seems like Coach cannot produce an answer to this simple question that he can back up with proof. Think of that. ;D
Not answering a simple question? You know all about that. lol
-
Hmm, it seems like Coach cannot produce an answer to this simple question that he can back up with proof. Think of that. ;D
Jesus Christ, how many times do we have to post up the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies, affidavits, etc? Maybe if you would actually pay attention you would know.
-
Not answering a simple question? You know all about that. lol
Yes he's a Libturd Lefty expert on ignoring, deflecting & avoiding answering simple questions
Yet doesn't like it when its done to him ::)
Hypocrite of the grand order.
-
Hmm, it seems like Coach cannot produce an answer to this simple question that he can back up with proof. Think of that. ;D
GOP wrestles with how to end investigation
Now, Republicans leading the investigation are actively deliberating how to conclude the inquiry.
Even though GOP Rep. Austin Scott said he would vote to impeach, he noted, “With the margins that we have, we don’t have the votes to impeach the president on the floor.”
Comer has said he wants to send criminal referrals to the Department of Justice in the hopes that former President Donald Trump is elected and can capitalize on them.
Jordan, who described criminal referrals as “on the table,” told CNN, “The Constitution doesn’t put a time limit on oversight. So, we’re going to do our job thoroughly and then at some point the House of Representatives will decide if we’re going to move forward with articles of impeachment.”
And then there are those, particularly in competitive districts, who think it is time to move on.
“It’s April. There’s an election in seven months from now,” GOP Rep. Nick LaLota, who represents a New York district Biden won in 2020, told CNN. “It would be wise for folks to pump the brakes on the legal accusations being made against the two major-party candidates, and I think we’re close enough to the election to allow the people to decide the future.”
Meanwhile, Comer single-handedly invited the president to testify at a hearing. After the White House declined the invitation, he dropped his invitation for a hearing and instead focused on his request for documents and written answers.
The tension spilled into public view last week when Comer and the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, got into a sparring match over the status of the investigation at an unrelated hearing.
Raskin posited, “You have not identified a single crime. What is the crime that you want to impeach Joe Biden for and keep this nonsense going?”
“You’re about to find out very soon,” Comer replied.
So, to answer for the Coach, who like Tim Scott, suddenly loses his ability to speak truthfully at oportune times... Biden is not under any investigation. The impeachment farce fell apart unlike Trumps impeachments. But Coach won't come out and admit it. That's Coach.
-
CNN.....hahaha
-
GOP wrestles with how to end investigation
Now, Republicans leading the investigation are actively deliberating how to conclude the inquiry.
Even though GOP Rep. Austin Scott said he would vote to impeach, he noted, “With the margins that we have, we don’t have the votes to impeach the president on the floor.”
Comer has said he wants to send criminal referrals to the Department of Justice in the hopes that former President Donald Trump is elected and can capitalize on them.
Jordan, who described criminal referrals as “on the table,” told CNN, “The Constitution doesn’t put a time limit on oversight. So, we’re going to do our job thoroughly and then at some point the House of Representatives will decide if we’re going to move forward with articles of impeachment.”
And then there are those, particularly in competitive districts, who think it is time to move on.
“It’s April. There’s an election in seven months from now,” GOP Rep. Nick LaLota, who represents a New York district Biden won in 2020, told CNN. “It would be wise for folks to pump the brakes on the legal accusations being made against the two major-party candidates, and I think we’re close enough to the election to allow the people to decide the future.”
Meanwhile, Comer single-handedly invited the president to testify at a hearing. After the White House declined the invitation, he dropped his invitation for a hearing and instead focused on his request for documents and written answers.
The tension spilled into public view last week when Comer and the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, got into a sparring match over the status of the investigation at an unrelated hearing.
Raskin posited, “You have not identified a single crime. What is the crime that you want to impeach Joe Biden for and keep this nonsense going?”
“You’re about to find out very soon,” Comer replied.
So, to answer for the Coach, who like Tim Scott, suddenly loses his ability to speak truthfully at oportune times... Biden is not under any investigation. The impeachment farce fell apart unlike Trumps impeachments. But Coach won't come out and admit it. That's Coach.
Pls can you remind us all where the Dummycraps Impeachments ended ??
;D
In the Fucking Bin. 🤣😂🤣
-
Pls can you remind us all where the Dummycraps Impeachments ended ??
;D
In the Fucking Bin. 🤣😂🤣
Just for the record, I know you don't live here so you may not know.. Donald Trump was impeached twice. Joe Biden has not been impeached and looks like he won't. Might google "Impeached" prior to commenting.
-
Just for the record, I know you don't live here so you may not know.. Donald Trump was impeached twice. Joe Biden has not been impeached and looks like he won't. Might google "Impeached" prior to commenting.
Nah Don't use or trust Google.
And what was the end result of them impeachments??
-
Nah Don't use or trust Google.
And what was the end result of them impeachments??
That is a great question. He was impeached. Twice....
-
That is a great question. He was impeached. Twice....
FFS its not a difficult question - Yeah he was impeached Twice & .............
was he found guilty / not guilty or were they dismissed
A Vote for the Pedocrat party & approve of Pedophilia
-
Jesus Christ, how many times do we have to post up the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies, affidavits, etc? Maybe if you would actually pay attention you would know.
Someone woke up again without a grasp on reality.
-
Someone woke up again without a grasp on reality.
Someone didn't trust google and is now perplexed over what Impeachment is. :)
-
FFS its not a difficult question - Yeah he was impeached Twice & .............
was he found guilty / not guilty or were they dismissed
A Vote for the Pedocrat party & approve of Pedophilia
Agnostic isn't intellectually honest enough to tell you that what we call "impeachment" is actually a two-step process. It requires impeachment by the House then a trial in the Senate where they vote on actual removal from office. Or perhaps he just doesn't understand how the process works.
-
Someone didn't trust google and is now perplexed over what Impeachment is. :)
Hmmmmm I'm perplexed ahhh okay, if you say ::)
He was acquitted both times - that was the result & answer you couldn't bring yourself to say. Pathetic.
-
Agnostic isn't intellectually honest enough to tell you that what we call "impeachment" is actually a two-step process. It requires impeachment by the House then a trial in the Senate where they vote on actual removal from office. Or perhaps he just doesn't understand how the process works.
Libs arent the sharpest tools in the shed.
Kid-groomers, glory-hole cock-suckers, gender-confused retards.
-
Agnostic isn't intellectually honest enough to tell you that what we call "impeachment" is actually a two-step process. It requires impeachment by the House then a trial in the Senate where they vote on actual removal from office. Or perhaps he just doesn't understand how the process works.
Maybe my question was to difficult for him to give a straight forward answer.
Yeah I'd researched the impeachment process, him thinking he knew it & I didn't was fucking laughable
What a 🤡
Those who vote for the Pedocrat party need a lot of help.
-
Jesus Christ, how many times do we have to post up the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies, affidavits, etc? Maybe if you would actually pay attention you would know.
How many times? As many times as you like. Post away, Coach. The fact remains that Biden is not currently under investigation, whether these investigations are only stalled or they have completely tanked. If the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies (most of which have proved to be false), affidavits, and what ever else you are trying to throw in, like maybe the kitchen sink proved President Biden is guilty of something, his impeachment would have continued. James Comer stated that he is going to pursue criminal charges against Trump after the election. I will believe this when it happens.
-
How many times? As many times as you like. Post away, Coach. The fact remains that Biden is not currently under investigation, whether these investigations are only stalled or they have completely tanked. If the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies (most of which have proved to be false), affidavits, and what ever else you are trying to throw in, like maybe the kitchen sink proved President Biden is guilty of something, his impeachment would have continued. James Comer stated that he is going to pursue criminal charges against Trump after the election. I will believe this when it happens.
IN THAT RETARD CHAMBER SITTING ON QOACH'S SHOULDERS HE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION!!!!
It's got to be true. It has just got to be! There is no way Qoach can survive without his delusional statements being true. It's like watching a dog chase his tail.
-
IN THAT RETARD CHAMBER SITTING ON QOACH'S SHOULDERS HE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION!!!!
It's got to be true. It has just got to be! There is no way Qoach can survive without his delusional statements being true. It's like watching a dog chase his tail.
I am in a good mood today, so I will cut Coach slack. He seems to have confused the terms investigation (the act or process of examining a crime, problem, statement, etc. carefully, especially to discover the truth) with suspicion (the act or an instance of suspecting something wrong without proof or on slight evidence)
-
How many times? As many times as you like. Post away, Coach. The fact remains that Biden is not currently under investigation,
You have to ask yourself why....two sets of rules maybe? The court of public opinion and whoever controls the media, controls the people that can't think for themselves. :)
-
How many times? As many times as you like. Post away, Coach. The fact remains that Biden is not currently under investigation, whether these investigations are only stalled or they have completely tanked. If the bank records, texts, emails, pics, videos, testimonies (most of which have proved to be false), affidavits, and what ever else you are trying to throw in, like maybe the kitchen sink proved President Biden is guilty of something, his impeachment would have continued. James Comer stated that he is going to pursue criminal charges against Trump after the election. I will believe this when it happens.
You are literally clueless in every respect. Same with Lurker. I mean COMPLETELY.
-
You are literally clueless in every respect. Same with Lurker. I mean COMPLETELY.
Okay then. If we are so ‘clueless’ help us out by posting an official link confirming President Biden is under investigation - by whom and for what. If you cannot do that then guess what? You are the joker around here who is clueless.
BTW what you previously posted was a list of things Chair of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer and the committee were investigating in hopes of impeaching him. At this point, it is dead according to James Comer, and he ought to know. Certainly, better than you do. But hey, maybe The Epoch Times is telling a different story just to keep folks like you happy.
-
Okay then. If we are so ‘clueless’ help us out by posting an official link confirming President Biden is under investigation - by whom and for what. If you cannot do that then guess what? You are the joker around here who is clueless.
BTW what you previously posted was a list of things Chair of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer and the committee were investigating in hopes of impeaching him. At this point, it is dead according to James Comer, and he ought to know. Certainly, better than you do. But hey, maybe The Epoch Times is telling a different story just to keep folks like you happy.
I mean absolutely and literally clueless
-
I mean absolutely and literally clueless
"I mean" you won't answer the question... It is not a closely held secret any time the President is under investigation. IN this case, the most I can find is the two potential investigations dwindled down into nothing.. the GOP has all but threw in the towel on the Hunter thing .... Now if YOU have some deep state, Kracken, QaNON Gateway Pundit BS you want to educate us on, feel free, but the fact is, he is NOT clueless, but hey, prove him wrong. "Coach"
-
You are literally clueless in every respect. Same with Lurker. I mean COMPLETELY.
Says the person that can't prove his own words. :D
-
I mean absolutely and literally clueless
Hahahaha this retarded hack can't even defend, explain, or support his own claims. His entire credibility has been "debunked". :D :D :D :D
Watch him continue to avoid a very simple request to provide proof of his claims. Instead he will ignore everything and post irrelevant gibberish. :D :D :D
-
I mean absolutely and literally clueless
Post proof of your claims. Prove us wrong.
-
All election interference. Trump will have his revenge term and I am looking forward to it. Let the mass deportations begin.
-
Hahahaha this retarded hack can't even defend, explain, or support his own claims. His entire credibility has been "debunked". :D :D :D :D
Watch him continue to avoid a very simple request to provide proof of his claims. Instead he will ignore everything and post irrelevant gibberish. :D :D :D
You're asking for a debate right (as is Prime) so lets do this face to face in front of everyone on this site. Completely fucking clueless. If you're going to talk shit, lets do this. Don't be a Biden
-
Post proof of your claims. Prove us wrong.
You're a computer wiz. Do a search.
-
You just found out? This happened a year ago. What have the House Republicans done to that crook Pomerantz?
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/12/former-trump-prosecutor-pomerantz-refuses-to-answer-house-questions.html
I'm going to venture to say that neither Prime or Lurker watched this
-
You're asking for a debate right (as is Prime) so lets do this face to face in front of everyone on this site. Completely fucking clueless. If you're going to talk shit, lets do this. Don't be a Biden
I find it really odd that they'll happily spend hours on here arguing
black is white & white is black Yet they won't do it live ???
Why not - they are like Bianca Bhanky arguing about how tough
he is & how he'll beat anyone in 15seconds & then is full of excuses
to avoid all that challenge him - pathetic in both cases.
Clearly they're not confident in their arguments. You Win Coach.
-
The shitter admin, enemies of free speech and citizens rights
Biden repeats his claim that he ‘got arrested’ defending civil rights.
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/26/politics/fact-check-joe-biden-claim-arrested-defending-civil-rights/index.html
Pic: "This is how I pinch little girl nipple"
(https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/c-gettyimages-2149412879.jpg?c=16x9&q=h_653,w_1160,c_fill/f_webp)
-
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
President Joe Biden went on “The Howard Stern Show” on Friday and repeated his familiar story about
the time he supposedly “got arrested” trying to defend the civil rights of Black Americans. ::) ::) ::)
-
You're asking for a debate right (as is Prime) so lets do this face to face in front of everyone on this site. Completely fucking clueless. If you're going to talk shit, lets do this. Don't be a Biden
Once again, your post is not proof of your claims. It think it is obvious to most folks that you simply do not have proof and therefore cannot post it.
-
Once again, your post is not proof of your claims. It think it is obvious to most folks that you simply do not have proof and therefore cannot post it.
Why you accept his offer of a live debate ??
Saves a lot of back & forth messages
-
You're asking for a debate right (as is Prime) so lets do this face to face in front of everyone on this site. Completely fucking clueless. If you're going to talk shit, lets do this. Don't be a Biden
No one is wasting time debating a retarded 6 year old.
-
Once again, your post is not proof of your claims. It think it is obvious to most folks that you simply do not have proof and therefore cannot post it.
He doesn't understand what proof is. Hence the arrow to the knee that every one of his posts result in.
-
ATF
Bureau of Alcobol ::) ::) ::) ::)
i=5-reXsNTYP71K_oU
-
Why you accept his offer of a live debate ??
Saves a lot of back & forth messages
I have no problem with back-and-forth messages. Written debates are fine and better suited to the Getbig forum.
Coach claims he wants to debate but has never stated what the topic(s) of the debate would be. Since he cannot or will not prove his claims in writing, how would debating be any different?
Debate:
'Debate is a process that involves formal discourse, discussion, and oral addresses on a particular topic or collection of topics, often with a moderator and an audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for common opposing viewpoints.'
These are the key aspects of a debate.
* The team/person supporting the motion must not shift their point of view.
* If a speaker makes a statement, they must be able to provide evidence or reasons to support the statement.
* Facts presented in a debate must be accurate.
* Speakers may not introduce new points in a rebuttal speech.
-
I have no problem with back-and-forth messages. Written debates are fine and better suited to the Getbig forum.
Coach claims he wants to debate but has never stated what the topic(s) of the debate would be. Since he cannot or will not prove his claims in writing, how would debating be any different?
Debate:
'Debate is a process that involves formal discourse, discussion, and oral addresses on a particular topic or collection of topics, often with a moderator and an audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for common opposing viewpoints.'
These are the key aspects of a debate.
* The team/person supporting the motion must not shift their point of view.
* If a speaker makes a statement, they must be able to provide evidence or reasons to support the statement.
* Facts presented in a debate must be accurate.
* Speakers may not introduce new points in a rebuttal speech.
Just ask him - Simple
-
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Every argument = game over... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ::) ::) ::)
(https://img.ifunny.co/images/9ef9cb23deb1dec4f5b992cb12cc593bb4905f34a4b7021510e285370909ceea_1.jpg)
-
I find it really odd that they'll happily spend hours on here arguing
black is white & white is black Yet they won't do it live ???
Why not - they are like Bianca Bhanky arguing about how tough
he is & how he'll beat anyone in 15seconds & then is full of excuses
to avoid all that challenge him - pathetic in both cases.
Clearly they're not confident in their arguments. You Win Coach.
How sad.. You have to know Coach is an imbecile when it comes to facts.. he has yet to win a discussion on here to date. Not one... why in the world would any sane person think that during a live debate, the Qanon Gateway Pundit moron would suddenly develop super powers and be able to function live? Nah, you are just stirring the pot.
-
Well, at least we know this debate is over. She admitted he molested her. I win.
-
Well, at least we know this debate is over. She admitted he molested her. I win.
Just another "Coach is a moron" point... She never admitted anything of the sort. She questioned whether it was appropriate that they showered together. Had you any police training... which you haven't had... you would know that falls way short of molestation... Just another reason no one is going to waste their time in a "live" debate". Outside of coaching and illegal substances, you are ignorant
-
Just another "Coach is a moron" point... She never admitted anything of the sort. She questioned whether it was appropriate that they showered together. Had you any police training... which you haven't had... you would know that falls way short of molestation... Just another reason no one is going to waste their time in a "live" debate". Outside of coaching, you are stupid
I meant this for any thread but since you mentioned it….yes she did.
-
I meant this for any thread but since you mentioned it….yes she did.
No.. she didn't.... you have yet to win ANY debate on Getbig.... you have the worst record., You are like the '76 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
-
How sad.. You have to know Coach is an imbecile when it comes to facts.. he has yet to win a discussion on here to date. Not one... why in the world would any sane person think that during a live debate, the Qanon Gateway Pundit moron would suddenly develop super powers and be able to function live? Nah, you are just stirring the pot.
Opinions vary & if you're so confident you're always correct then a simple live debate shouldn't
Be any kind of problem. Put your money where you mouth is / Put up or Shut up.
You're doing the same cowardly deflection as Prime - your so self confident yet won't have a debate
With him, Pathetic.
Either debate with him or stop calling him on here.
He's got more balls & back bone than any of you lot that are running away from a live debate.
-
Opinions vary & if you're so confident you're always correct then a simple live debate shouldn't
Be any kind of problem. Put your money where you mouth is / Put up or Shut up.
You're doing the same cowardly deflection as Prime - your so self confident yet won't have a debate
With him, Pathetic.
Either debate with him or stop calling him on here.
He's got more balls & back bone than any of you lot that are running away from a live debate.
Opinions vary, facts don't
-
Opinions vary, facts don't
Debate him Mr Facts then & be done with it.
Oh as your avoiding this here it is again. ;D
-
No.. she didn't.... you have yet to win ANY debate on Getbig.... you have the worst record., You are like the '76 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
Hahhahahaa
-
Opinions vary, facts don't
The folks on Getbig attempting to instigate a debate have no concept of the structure of debates. It is obvious they never actively or passively participated in a debate.
Many folks on Getbig express their opinions. Opinions are all but worthless in a debate. An opinion is not necessarily based upon what is true, accurate or informed. Opinions are the opposite of arguments. Arguments are coherent and contain logical reasons backing up and supporting the assessments.
-
It’s cute how you three in a circle jerk come on here and run…er, I mean leave at the same time
-
The folks on Getbig attempting to instigate a debate have no concept of the structure of debates. It is obvious they never actively or passively participated in a debate.
Many folks on Getbig express their opinions. Opinions are all but worthless in a debate. An opinion is not necessarily based upon what is true, accurate or informed. Opinions are the opposite of arguments. Arguments are coherent and contain logical reasons backing up and supporting the assessments.
Shut up & debate.
As usual is Only You who knows how to debate is it ::)
Excuses excuses FFS.
-
Shut up & debate.
As usual is Only You who knows how to debate is it ::)
Excuses excuses FFS.
Thanks for noticing. Apparently it is only me. ;D
-
It’s cute how you three in a circle jerk come on here and run…er, I mean leave at the same time
It’s cute how a retard - that would be you - is always wrong.
-
It’s cute how you three in a circle jerk come on here and run…er, I mean leave at the same time
Right... it is cute. And it is not that hard to arrange either. Every day, we send each other PMs deciding when to log on to Getbig and have fun at your expense. Please feel free to check our stats. It appears I am most active on Getbig between the hours of 2:00 pm and 5:00 pm PT.
-
Right... it is cute. And it is not that hard to arrange either. Every day, we send each other PMs deciding when to log on to Getbig and have fun at your expense. Please feel free to check our stats. It appears I am most active on Getbig between the hours of 2:00 pm and 5:00 pm PT.
Bet you won’t be back after November. 😆
-
Right... it is cute. And it is not that hard to arrange either. Every day, we send each other PMs deciding when to log on to Getbig and have fun at your expense. Please feel free to check our stats. It appears I am most active on Getbig between the hours of 2:00 pm and 5:00 pm PT.
Great then message them all & be brave enough to post your replies in my New thread
Oh & Don't mention Donald for deflection , Start you're own thread about him.
-
Great then message them all & be brave enough to post your replies in my New thread
Oh & Don't mention Donald for deflection , Start you're own thread about him.
There is no need to message them because we are one in the same person... three gimmicks... "See no evil speak no evil and hear no evil." Hmm, you started a new thread? How clever of you. Sorry, no can do. I have a self-imposed rule that I must mention Trump to deflect from posts having contents I disagree with. ;)
-
There is no need to message them because we are one in the same person... three gimmicks... "See no evil speak no evil and hear no evil." Hmm, you started a new thread? How clever of you. Sorry, no can do. I have a self-imposed rule that I must mention Trump to deflect from posts having contents I disagree with. ;)
https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=692592.0
For you Mr Clever Cloggs