Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Parker on May 05, 2006, 09:25:16 AM
-
In no certain order:
1. Lee Preist (natch)
2. Ronnie Coleman (known for his double peaks before he was Mr. O)
3. Flex Wheeler (When Flexed arms are almost a perfect circle)
4. Aaron Baker (Tris rival Levrone's--look at BFTO 98)
-
no Mattarazzo?!?!??!?!!?
-
Ronnie Coleman, right arm.
Ronnie Coleman, left arm.
then, 8 other random limbs.
-
DEMAYO never get's credit for em
but he had some wicked arms!
-
My canons. ;D
-
Arnold, definately arnold should be in the mix there somewhere.
-
What about the older black bodybuilder, I forgot his name. He was bald on top of his head.
-
My bad, I was at work, and tried to mem. it.
1. lee Preist (natch)
2. Ronnie coleman (freaky Bis)
3. Flex Wheeler (almost perfect circle)
4. Aaron Baker (tris rival Levrone's- checkBFTO 98)
5. Darrem Charles (freaky bis)
6. Robby Robinson (bicep peaks are off the meter)
7. Sergio Oliva (bigger than Arnold's)
8. Leroy Colbert (biggest in his day?)
9. Kevin Levrone (tris--what can be said?)
10. Arnold (bis0
**Honorable mention
Dex Jackson (full arms, remind me of Flex's)
Vic Martinez (Tris are a beast check his DVD)
-
What about the older black bodybuilder, I forgot his name. He was bald on top of his head.
hahahhahah!
<that be about 900000000 bb's , you mean FLEX WHEELER?>
-
If wer'e talkin regular dudes I'll put mine up against anyone here.
-
no not flex, this bodybuilder is older....
-
What about the older black bodybuilder, I forgot his name. He was bald on top of his head.
albert beckles. crazy bi's on that guy
(http://ironage.us/yabbse/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=10157.0;id=13700;image)
amazing back too
(http://ironage.us/yabbse/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=10157.0;id=13653;image)
-
Jean Paul Guillaume (pro in the late 80's from the carribbean.) Crazy biceps.
-
Fox, Szkalak, Rick Wayne
-
Thats it..............thanks Rich!
-
no Fedorov in the tip 10
-
Vince taylor has to get a mention surely.
What about yates?
[img]
-
[img]
-
[img]
-
No Larry Scott? Or Casey Viator?
-
alexxx blows them away >:(
-
king ;D.............im drunk
-
(http://www.bodybuilders.com/taylor07.jpg)
-
Forgot about Vince Taylor, his tris were cut up.
Dorian's arms, while good, were not freaky, plus after he tore his bicep, they sucked even more.
And forgot about Eddie Robinson.
-
king ;D.............im drunk
Hahahahaha..... ;D They say being drunk does make you more generous ;D
-
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/comp986.jpg)
:o :o :o
-
Ronnie Coleman, right arm.
Ronnie Coleman, left arm.
you've watched "love actually" wayyyyy too many times Rob!
David beckhams right leg
infact
David Beckhams left leg!
:D
-
Do not forget Dillet
-
Sculpture, excellent use of irony....Dorian Yates and good arms....LMAO ;D
-
Yates arms Sucked.
-
Yates arms Sucked.
According to ND, they were better than Ronnie's ::).
Everything ND says is pretty much null and void after this ridiculous argument.
-
Lance has some guns on him.
-
According to ND, they were better than Ronnie's ::).
Everything ND says is pretty much null and void after this ridiculous argument.
They were overall better ;D
-
What about Albert Beckles.
-
Yates arms Sucked.
Yes, of course, the worst with Dickerson ones.
Yates was a calamity for BBing.
If Shawn Ray had won at least 2 Mr. O. as he deserved it, BBing would not been so bad nowadays... :-X
-
Robbie must be included.
-
Jean Paul Guillaume (pro in the late 80's from the carribbean.) Crazy biceps.
Him and Brian Buchanan had the same shape (waist taper, back), then it was Flex and Melvin. Although Jean had double peaked biceps.
One of Melvin's bis seem to have a double peak to it, odd, that one does and the other doesn't.
-
taking weight into consideration
best arms on top pro ever = arnold schwartzi
worst arms on top pro ever = dorian yates
taking weight out of consideration: every muscle on ron colman frame (he would win O even if he came in 250-255)
-
taking weight into consideration
best arms on top pro ever = arnold schwartzi
worst arms on top pro ever = dorian yates
Arnold lacked tris, he was all biceps. He pointed out this weakness he had in his tris in his Encyclopedia of Bodybuilding. Even though he said he made a difference, it wasn't much, his bis still overpowered his tris.
-
Arnold lacked tris, he was all biceps. He pointed out this weakness he had in his tris in his Encyclopedia of Bodybuilding. Even though he said he made a difference, it wasn't much, his bis still overpowered his tris.
im talking about the whole arm which includes the 2 heads of bicep + 3 heads of tricep. i also take into consideration height and weight.
not to forget!!! mr swartz was 6'1 and a half!! weighin 225-240 on stage! if you take this into consideration and you know that every inch = 7 pounds and all of us bodybuilders know that 1 inch = about 7 pounds on a male...then you would know that if arnold was 5'11 like ron he would be about 15-18 pounds lighter which would make him 210lb on stage!!!
now show me any other 5'11 210lb bodybuilder that has/had/will ever have 22 inch arms. i would love to see him. (no synthol used!)
arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER. (weight taken into consideration) while dorian and lee are the worst but i chose dorian as the worst due to his over all mass advantage over lee which should have given him a hell of a lot bigger/better shaped arms than what he had. he still was an awesome bodybuilder though.
* arnold had very good triceps but his biceps were simply phenominal+
-
aaron baker was a hype..no way in hell his arms r as big as levrones..baker was fake
-
aaron baker was a hype..no way in hell his arms r as big as levrones..baker was fake
You're high !! Aaron's arms were huge !!
-
Aaron again
-
Again ;)
-
Yates arms Sucked.
His arms sucked? lol his forearms were huge like Mike Mentzers , his triceps were awesome , and before he tore his biceps they were good , so for you to say they sucked shows you don't know what you're talking about !! certainly not top ten but not as bad as people go on about .
-
His tris ( especially sidehead ) were outstanding and his forearms are huge !!
-
scott steiner, brad hollibaugh and derek anthony spring to mind................... ;D
in all seriousness i would say that the following are amongst the best from an overall perspective:
lee priest
ronnie
sergio
levrone
al beckles
mike materazzo
frank mcgrath (yes seriously)
-
in all seriousness i would say that the following are amongst the best from an overall perspective:
lee priest
ronnie
sergio
levrone
al beckles
mike materazzo
True. You might want to add Flex Wheeler to that list, as well...
frank mcgrath (yes seriously)
Wrong.
His forearms are pretty big, I'll give him that, but his biceps have no peak and his triceps are underwhelming to say the least. Federov's forearms are just as large, if not larger, and his biceps/triceps are far more impressive than McGrath's...
McGrath's arms only look big because the rest of him is so small in comparison ;)
-
but on the whole his arms look more proportionate than most, thats the angle im getting at
-
Arnold's arms were great; most guys aren't perfectly balanced.
Yates' only good tricep shot is that side shot; his tris are nothing special and thus match his bis.
-
dorian was a monstrous bodybuilder .. but his arms were a bit s.hit!
he had great tris n forearms but the bicep is the showpiece muscle of that limb and his were ... well ..... a bit s'hit!
vince taylor's got some swole biceps .....
-
What about Albert Beckles.
I was at the contest where Ken Passarielo wore that Kiss make up. He came in dead last. Beckles won the show.
-
Casey Viator HAS TO BE IN THE PICK
-
im talking about the whole arm which includes the 2 heads of bicep + 3 heads of tricep. i also take into consideration height and weight.
not to forget!!! mr swartz was 6'1 and a half!! weighin 225-240 on stage! if you take this into consideration and you know that every inch = 7 pounds and all of us bodybuilders know that 1 inch = about 7 pounds on a male...then you would know that if arnold was 5'11 like ron he would be about 15-18 pounds lighter which would make him 210lb on stage!!!
now show me any other 5'11 210lb bodybuilder that has/had/will ever have 22 inch arms. i would love to see him. (no synthol used!)
arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER. (weight taken into consideration) while dorian and lee are the worst but i chose dorian as the worst due to his over all mass advantage over lee which should have given him a hell of a lot bigger/better shaped arms than what he had. he still was an awesome bodybuilder though.
* arnold had very good triceps but his biceps were simply phenominal+
""" arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER"""....I'm sorry to say this, but you just lost a lot of credibility with this post :-\
-
I was at the contest where Ken Passarielo wore that Kiss make up. He came in dead last. Beckles won the show.
Speak of the devil !! ;)
-
arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER....I'm sorry to say this, but you just lost a lot of credibility with this post :-\
You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall
-
You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall
I guess it wasn't clear that I was quoting him and disagreeing. I think he hurt his reputation with that post.
-
Arnold had good triceps , not great but good !!
-
Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.
-
Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.
You have a point , people tend to go crazy because of the sheer size of his arms and his peakes are freaky but Lee Preist's arms are better no question about it , and look how small Coleman's forearms are in that pic .
-
thats why so many people use Larry Scott as an example.
His biceps weren't "peaked" like Arnolds per se....
but the balance between his biceps & triceps were amazing.
Then...his bicep seemed to go tight to the elbow with no gap.
-
my terminology may not be correct but see what i mean about biceps looking full or whatever?
-
Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.
That's not even a good picture ::) It looks more like 2 balls on his triceps ::)
-
Pastell had amazing arms
-
Pastell had amazing arms
I agree with that & whats more amazing is his height!
-
thats why so many people use Larry Scott as an example.
His biceps weren't "peaked" like Arnolds per se....
but the balance between his biceps & triceps were amazing.
Then...his bicep seemed to go tight to the elbow with no gap.
Too bad his delts were missing in action ::)
-
that's what i'm saying. they look like little tennis balls on top of big triceps.
-
You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall
If you consider criteria such as historical influential factors, then Arnold has one of the best pairs. Arnold's arms and chest was a role model for BBing.
-
Too bad his delts were missing in action ::)
Well it was enough back in the day to give him an "O"
-
Lee and Vince , Lee's arms are outstanding !!
-
that's what i'm saying. they look like little tennis balls on top of big triceps.
Let's see a pic of your arms ::)
-
Larry Scott's arms were ............... add your own adjective !!
-
well one thing i can say is that they're bigger than yours. anyway i'm just saying that coleman doesn't belong with lee priest or arnold.
-
Larry Scott's arms were pretty damn impressive fill in your own adjective !!
;)
-
well one thing i can say is that they're bigger than yours. anyway i'm just saying that coleman doesn't belong with lee priest or arnold.
Coleman is definitely in the same category as those guys when it comes to arms. They are better than Arnold's.
-
watch a video of the 99 Olympia - Ronnie's biceps at that show are the best I have ever seen.
huge, cut and detailed.
If the photo does not capture his arms at full contraction, his arms tend to look weird.
But when they do, they look something like this:
(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/rc37.jpg)
-
Gunter has some insanely huge biceps :o
-
watch a video of the 99 Olympia - Ronnie's biceps at that show are the best I have ever seen.
huge, cut and detailed.
If the photo does not capture his arms at full contraction, his arms tend to look weird.
But when they do, they look something like this:
(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/rc37.jpg)
Freaky bis!
-
see i dont know what it is but look at gunter and look at ronnie. they may have the same size arms but it looks like the bicep definition from the inside starts lower.
-
see i dont know what it is but look at gunter and look at ronnie. they may have the same size arms but it looks like the bicep definition from the inside starts lower.
Unless Gunter has insane thickness, his arms are smaller than Ronnie's. Did you see the picture of them posing next to each other? ???
-
Arnold will always have some of the best arms. Outrageous peak, probably the best ever; even better than Robinson or Beckles though it's close. Arms overall were huge; tris were not a weakness even if not as dominant. Not as balanced as Scott, relatively not quite Sergio volume though close, but more outrageous then either, with greater refinement.
-
Arnolds's triceps wern't bad at all !!
-
Arnold will always have a pair of the best arms; peaks was outrageous, probably the best ever, even better than Robinson or Beckles. Arms overall were huge; tris were not a weakness even if not as dominant. Not as balanced as Scott, not quite as huge as Sergio, but more outrageous then either, and with greater refinement.
They were definitely a weak point in the front double bi :-\
-
Weak points..nothing.
-
They were definitely a weak point in the front double bi :-\
Weak? wtf
-
Weak points..nothing.
His triceps look tiny there :-\ They look sick as a dog :-\
-
Maybe in comparison, but there was size there.
-
Weak? wtf
When his biceps were at their biggest, the tris looked weak :-[. Even there, they look undersized.
-
This is as good as it gets
-
""" arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER"""....I'm sorry to say this, but you just lost a lot of credibility with this post :-\
let me explain it again for the slow among us ;) i will make it as clear as i can even though if you read what i wrote in the other posts it is quite clear.
ARNOLD SCHWARZI WOULD WIN STILL WIN O NOW DAYS IF HE WAS A COMPETETIVE BODYBUILDER IN HIS 30S.
THERE IS NO OTHER BODYBUILDER THAT HAD HIS RESPONSE TO NATURAL TRAINING AND HIS RESPONSE TO HORMONES.
ARNOLD SCHWARTZI IF TRAINED DURING THE 90S WOULD BE TARING APART ANY ONE. ANY ONE!
HE WORKED THE HARDEST! HE RESPONDED TO TRAINING THE BEST! HE WOULD RESPOND 10 TIMES BETTER THAN RON COLMAN AND 20 TIMES BETER THAN DORIAN YATES TO HORMONES AT THE DOSES THOSE 2 TOOK/TAKE.
ARNOLD IS A TALL GUY HE IS CLOSE TO 6'2 AND NEXT TO RON COLMAN HE, AS I SAID BEFORE, WOULD LOOK AT HIS COMPETETIVE DAYS LIKE A 210LB GUY WHILE RON WOULD BE COMING ON STAGE 280LB AND THEIR ARMS WOULD STILL MESURE 21.5-22-22.5 INCHES WHICH IS VERY CLOSE!
OFCOURSE RON WOULD WIN SINCE HE HAS MORE LEAN MUSCLE MASS OVER ALL,,BUT IF THE 2 COMPETED NOW DAYS ARNOLD WOULD HAVE THE SAME DOSES OF HORMONES AND THE SAME KNOLWEDGE LEARNED DURING THE YEARS TO GET HIS ARMS TO BE 23-24 INCHES ON STAGE!
THUS IF ARNOLD WAS A COMPETETIVE BODYBUILDER NOW DAYS HE WOULD MOST LIKLEY BE AGAIN NUMBER 1.
IF HE ONLY KNEW HALF THE SECRETS WE USE TODAY....
*lucious darling my credibility is only important to me when i talk to the bank it dont matter to me who believs me and who dont ;)
-
Double bis not bad at all, tris look ok too.
-
can't believe you bitches did not mention Dennis James.
-
the thing with Gunter is that his bicep muscle is bigger then Ronnies, but his triceps have always been overpowered in the same was as Arnolds were. Gunter is said to have 23" arms so there is nothing at all wrong with them for size. They just arent proportionate in regards to the bicep/tricep combination
-
Gunter's got nowhere near the same size as Ron-his arms should be bigger, not smaller in this pic considered his height advantage.
In the second pic, one arm is photoshopped.
-
let me explain it again for the slow among us ;) i will make it as clear as i can even though if you read what i wrote in the other posts it is quite clear.
ARNOLD SCHWARZI WOULD WIN STILL WIN O NOW DAYS IF HE WAS A COMPETETIVE BODYBUILDER IN HIS 30S.
THERE IS NO OTHER BODYBUILDER THAT HAD HIS RESPONSE TO NATURAL TRAINING AND HIS RESPONSE TO HORMONES.
ARNOLD SCHWARTZI IF TRAINED DURING THE 90S WOULD BE TARING APART ANY ONE. ANY ONE!
HE WORKED THE HARDEST! HE RESPONDED TO TRAINING THE BEST! HE WOULD RESPOND 10 TIMES BETTER THAN RON COLMAN AND 20 TIMES BETER THAN DORIAN YATES TO HORMONES AT THE DOSES THOSE 2 TOOK/TAKE.
ARNOLD IS A TALL GUY HE IS CLOSE TO 6'2 AND NEXT TO RON COLMAN HE, AS I SAID BEFORE, WOULD LOOK AT HIS COMPETETIVE DAYS LIKE A 210LB GUY WHILE RON WOULD BE COMING ON STAGE 280LB AND THEIR ARMS WOULD STILL MESURE 21.5-22-22.5 INCHES WHICH IS VERY CLOSE!
OFCOURSE RON WOULD WIN SINCE HE HAS MORE LEAN MUSCLE MASS OVER ALL,,BUT IF THE 2 COMPETED NOW DAYS ARNOLD WOULD HAVE THE SAME DOSES OF HORMONES AND THE SAME KNOLWEDGE LEARNED DURING THE YEARS TO GET HIS ARMS TO BE 23-24 INCHES ON STAGE!
THUS IF ARNOLD WAS A COMPETETIVE BODYBUILDER NOW DAYS HE WOULD MOST LIKLEY BE AGAIN NUMBER 1.
IF HE ONLY KNEW HALF THE SECRETS WE USE TODAY....
*lucious darling my credibility is only important to me when i talk to the bank it dont matter to me who believs me and who dont ;)
Ironage nonsense from a guy who has been drinking the Kool-Aid. The more you insist, the more credibility you lose. Please stop :-\
-
well one thing i can say is that they're bigger than yours. anyway i'm just saying that coleman doesn't belong with lee priest or arnold.
At one time that was all Ronnie was known for, his biceps...then all of a sudden he grew a physique to go with them.
-
l
ARNOLD SCHWARTZI IF TRAINED DURING THE 90S WOULD BE TARING APART ANY ONE. ANY ONE!
HE WORKED THE HARDEST! HE RESPONDED TO TRAINING THE BEST! HE WOULD RESPOND 10 TIMES BETTER THAN RON COLMAN AND 20 TIMES BETER THAN DORIAN YATES TO HORMONES AT THE DOSES THOSE 2 TOOK/TAKE.
ARNOLD IS A TALL GUY HE IS CLOSE TO 6'2 AND NEXT TO RON COLMAN HE, AS I SAID BEFORE, WOULD LOOK AT HIS COMPETETIVE DAYS LIKE A 210LB GUY WHILE RON WOULD BE COMING ON STAGE 280LB AND THEIR ARMS WOULD STILL MESURE 21.5-22-22.5 INCHES WHICH IS VERY CLOSE!
Sorry, he wouldn't, Arnold had a wide waist, said so himself, and before you post some twisting shot of him, look at a pic of him straight on... his waist is wide. There was a pic of Arnold at the beach next to a blonde woman in yellow bikini, it ran in Playboy. His waist was wide as hell, not in the 20's, but like a 36" The only one close to Arnold's physique is Gunter.
So, if he trained like today's pros, he more than likely would look like Gunter, who is the same height, and has a wide waist...it didn't matter if Gunter was 230, 290, or 310...
And we all know how Gunter has faired so far.
-
Arnold had good triceps , not great but good !!
That pose is rare for Arnold.
-
So, if he trained like today's pros, he more than likely would look like Gunter, who is the same height, and has a wide waist...it didn't matter if Gunter was 230, 290, or 310...
No; Gunter's more like Ferrigno; neither had/have Schwarzenegger's muscle volume relative to height, or the shape, lines or refinement.
-
thats why so many people use Larry Scott as an example.
His biceps weren't "peaked" like Arnolds per se....
but the balance between his biceps & triceps were amazing.
Then...his bicep seemed to go tight to the elbow with no gap.
Larry had literally no gap between his elbow joint and the insertions of his bicep and triceps. Amazing.
-
Larry Scott's arms were ............... add your own adjective !!
Astounding. This shot is from the late 70's when Larry made his comeback for one show.
-
Larry had literally no gap between his elbow joint and the insertions of his bicep and triceps. Amazing.
No better or worse than a high peak, just a matter of taste. Lavrone, Sergio & Rick Wayne had similar fullness.
Larry must think a higher peak's desirable. He's the exception and succeeded in achieving a greater peak after retiring:
-
Sorry, he wouldn't, Arnold had a wide waist, said so himself, and before you post some twisting shot of him, look at a pic of him straight on... his waist is wide. There was a pic of Arnold at the beach next to a blonde woman in yellow bikini, it ran in Playboy. His waist was wide as hell, not in the 20's, but like a 36" The only one close to Arnold's physique is Gunter.
So, if he trained like today's pros, he more than likely would look like Gunter, who is the same height, and has a wide waist...it didn't matter if Gunter was 230, 290, or 310...
And we all know how Gunter has faired so far.
There are a several pictures of Arnold, taken dead straight, posted on the previous page and his waist looks pretty tight to me (considering his size).
Sure, if he'd increased his body weight considerably his waist size would've also gone up. Maybe that is one arugment for not going for sheer size, for size's sake, at the expense of lines and aesthetics.
-
Weak points..nothing.
You could nitpick and say his biceps were developed to a greater degree than his triceps or forearms.
-
Gunter's got nowhere near the same size as Ron-his arms should be bigger, not smaller in this pic considered his height advantage.
In the second pic, one arm is photoshopped.
The second pic is not photoshopped its a scan from Flex magazines coverage of the 2003 Mr Olympia , so don't make declarations without knowing beforehand it makes you look stupid when you do . ;)
-
Most BBs have some imbalance; in Arnold's case the tris were still good if not in perfect balance vs. someone like Ruhl where's there's a noticable difference.
-
The second pic is not photoshopped its a scan from Flex magazines coverage of the 2003 Mr Olympia , so don't make declarations without knowing beforehand it makes you look stupid when you do
Others have made the same observations in the past, you weren't paying attention you unobservant idiot.
Look at the difference in the size of the bicep in the two pics-the second one's accurate. Now I understand why you like Yates; you can't see.
-
Others have made the same observations in the past, you weren't paying attention.
Look at the difference in the size of the bicep in the two pics you moron-now I understand why you like Yates; you can't see.
I'm going to own your ass very shortly when I find the magazine and scan the pic as it sits !! ;)
-
Look carefully at the pics; I could care less if a photoshopped pic is shown in a mag.
-
I'm going to own your ass very shortly when I find the magazine and scan the pic as it sits !! ;)
Agree with ND on this one - I too have the FLEX issue that has this pic (from the Mr O contest coverage). It's NOT photoshopped.
-
Look carefully at the pics; I could care less if a photoshopped pic is shown in a mag.
Now you're backpeddling , now its the magazine who photoshopped the pic ::) get the hook , here you go , consider your ass owned >:( ;)
-
Classic ironage clone, believes everything he's told or reads. hahahhahhhha.
-
Classic ironage clone, believes everything he's told or reads. hahahhahhhha.
Do you feel stupid? because you sure as fuck look stupid , be a man and admit you're wrong , I'll accept your apology when you're man enough to give it .
-
How bout Vince G?
you guys are blind!!!
-
More arms?
-
How bout Vince G?
you guys are blind!!!
Synthol!
-
Now you're backpeddling , now its the magazine who photoshopped the pic ::) get the hook , here you go , consider your ass owned >:( ;)
Hahahahaha....Narcissist icDeity just delivered a brutal owning ;D I knew it was coming, too, but nothing could be done to stop it ;D
-
More arms?
Imagine Padilla and Priest doing battle!
-
Classic ironage clone, believes everything he's told or reads. hahahhahhhha.
Pumpster, time after time you prove just what a fool you are.
-
the pics of Gunter are both legit. Only thing is that the one of him doing the front double bicep is old and the first pic is actually a contest pic which was posted in Flex. Ronnies biceps have grown considerably with that added peak and tricep mass so why cant Gunters?
The pic of them both doing the front double bicep, wasnt that when Gunter was sick prior to the O and came in alot smaller than normal. I think he was also in the middle of a divorce. Whatever it was, he wasnt his usual size thats for sure.
-
brian buchanon had some big arms. he never gets mentioned
-
Now you're backpeddling , now its the magazine who photoshopped the pic get the hook , here you go , consider your ass owned
Hahahahaha....Narcissist icDeity just delivered a brutal owning I knew it was coming, too, but nothing could be done to stop it
ND thinks Yates has good arms, you knucklehead. Testosterone-laden teenagers getting off with the now-predictable and overused "owned". Hey guys I have news for you that's lame, just like when you over-used meltdown too. hahahahahhahahahah
Here's a pic from the 05 Olympia that is accurate. Nothing like that other pic, you idiots.
-
Robby Roinbosn had the best overall package in terms of arms.
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/winky2.jpg)
-
Sorry, he wouldn't, Arnold had a wide waist, said so himself, and before you post some twisting shot of him, look at a pic of him straight on... his waist is wide. There was a pic of Arnold at the beach next to a blonde woman in yellow bikini, it ran in Playboy. His waist was wide as hell, not in the 20's, but like a 36" The only one close to Arnold's physique is Gunter.
So, if he trained like today's pros, he more than likely would look like Gunter, who is the same height, and has a wide waist...it didn't matter if Gunter was 230, 290, or 310...
And we all know how Gunter has faired so far.
Arnold would destroy everyone in any time!
Eccept humble me. ;D
-
Cutler tops all these guys overall. Priest is like 5'2'' his arms are barely 20'' and he has no peaks.
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/rosbo030.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/arn_main.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/rosbo013.jpg)
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/more7.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/great72.jpg)
-
ok that was pretty gross :-X
-
ok that was pretty gross :-X
better than another penis shot
-
i was trying to post some more bodybuilding shots and i dont know how the hell those shark pics came up,my photobucket is getting screwed up somehow
-
OK, new shitty thread!!!! The shark VS Ronnie!! who would win at golf???
-
ND thinks Yates has good arms, you knucklehead. Testosterone-laden teenagers getting off with the now-predictable and overused "owned". Hey guys I have news for you that's lame, just like when you over-used Support Getbig too. hahahahahhahahahah
Here's a pic from the 05 Olympia that is accurate. Nothing like that other pic, you idiots.
Your the idiot, have you ever even posed in your life ??? The postion gunter is in shows the maximum peak of the biceps, look at arnold pics and you'll notice the same thing when he is in a similar pose.
-
Cutler tops all these guys overall. Priest is like 5'2'' his arms are barely 20'' and he has no peaks.
Cutler?
-
Cutler tops all these guys overall. Priest is like 5'2'' his arms are barely 20'' and he has no peaks.
Cutler admitted that his arms were smaller than Dexter Jackson's ::)
-
Cutler's arms aren't smaller than Jackson's. You must be mistaking. Dexter's own site list them as being like 21 inches and Jay's site list his arms as 22 and a half I believe. Jay has the most underrated arms in the whole IFBB. They are massive all around. He has full peaked biceps.
-
(http://www.fitplus.cz/allpic/mf/f_108.jpg)
(http://www.dolfzine.com/IronMan7-Jay-Cutler.jpg)
-
Cutler's arms aren't smaller than Jackson's. You must be mistaking. Dexter's own site list them as being like 21 inches and Jay's site list his arms as 22 and a half I believe. Jay has the most underrated arms in the whole IFBB. They are massive all around. He has full peaked biceps.
I beleive it was in 2003 or 2004 when Jay said that, it was the year Dex blew up in size, most notably his arms. In Dex's video from Muscletime his arms are huge, but footage from back stage at the SHawn Ray Muscle camp at the O, Jay's arms looked a tad bigger than Dex's.
-
Cutler's arms aren't smaller than Jackson's. You must be mistaking. Dexter's own site list them as being like 21 inches and Jay's site list his arms as 22 and a half I believe. Jay has the most underrated arms in the whole IFBB. They are massive all around. He has full peaked biceps.
His arms need more vascularity ::)
-
His arms need more vascularity ::)
Looked okay from the back. You can see the tricep development
-
I think Dex's tricep need more vascularity..
(http://www.flexonline.com/05contests/05AC/men/show/images/aaaa0754.jpg)
-
Jay Cutlers biceps have absolutely no cut, definition or vascularity (synthol?), there's no way his arms are top ten material.
His triceps are decent though, but Mustafa's are 41657964 times better.
-
Jay Cutlers biceps have absolutely no cut, definition or vascularity (synthol?), there's no way his arms are top ten material.
His triceps are decent though, but Mustafa's are 41657964 times better.
Agreed. Jay's arms are smoother than silly putty.
-
Dexs arms are amongst the most unsymmetrical in the IFBB. OK, if his biggest arm is 21" then the other is around 19.5" because there is a BIG difference between them!
Jays arms have always been phenomenal, i agree about them being underrated.
-
Looked okay from the back. You can see the tricep development
That is the most wrinkly back EVER bar none!!!