Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Dos Equis on December 08, 2025, 01:19:29 PM
-
I really hope Texas voters are not crazy enough to elect this dummy.
Fierce Trump critic Jasmine Crockett shakes up high-stakes Senate race
Progressive Democrat launches her Senate campaign just before the filing deadline for candidates in Texas
By Paul Steinhauser, Peter Pinedo, Elizabeth Elkind, Deirdre Heavey
Fox News
Published December 8, 2025
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fierce-trump-critic-jasmine-crockett-shakes-up-high-stakes-senate-race
-
Isn't this the broad that admitted she hasn't been focusing on her job because she's been obsessed with Trump ???
-
Isn't this the broad that admitted she hasn't been focusing on her job because she's been obsessed with Trump ???
She definitely has TDS, but she's also an idiot. Bad combination.
-
She definitely has TDS, but she's also an idiot. Bad combination.
Kind of goes hand in hand, I mean look at the liberals here.
-
I'd be shocked if she won.
-
Kind of goes hand in hand, I mean look at the liberals here.
It is understandable that you and his base would rather folks ignore or gloss over Trump's current misdeeds. It follows that anyone who points them out gets accused of having TDS.
-
The fact she thought this was a good campaign ad, which consists solely of Trump calling her a low IQ person for 30 seconds, just shows Trump is right about her being a low IQ person. Hilarious. ;D
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡
@PollTracker2024
Jasmine Crockett’s (D) announcement video. #TXSenate
https://x.com/PollTracker2024/status/1998144654555144342
-
The fact she thought this was a good campaign ad, which consists solely of Trump calling her a low IQ person for 30 seconds, just shows Trump is right about her being a low IQ person. Hilarious. ;D
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡
@PollTracker2024
Jasmine Crockett’s (D) announcement video. #TXSenate
https://x.com/PollTracker2024/status/1998144654555144342
They run their entire campaigns over TDS instead of substance and talking about issues for the people.
-
They run their entire campaigns over TDS instead of substance and talking about issues for the people.
Do you consider this substance and talking about issues for the people?
-
Do you consider this substance and talking about issues for the people?
Didn't even watch it and I can tell it has more substance than any leftist talking head.
-
They run their entire campaigns over TDS instead of substance and talking about issues for the people.
Right? Her opening campaign ad is all about Trump instead of what she actually brings to the table.
-
Right? Her opening campaign ad is all about Trump instead of what she actually brings to the table.
She's banking on the voters to hear the word Trump and knee jerk vote for her.
-
Right? Her opening campaign ad is all about Trump instead of what she actually brings to the table.
From what I have read, Trump's overall approval rating hovers somewhere around 31%. This suggests that the other 69% of folks approve her campaign's focus on Trump's unpopularity.
-
From what I have read, Trump's overall approval rating hovers somewhere around 31%. This suggests that the other 69% of folks approve her campaign's focus on Trump's unpopularity.
Liberal math
-
Liberal math
She’s going to win, and even if it’s close, that means she boat raced her opponent. Trump is not making friends or bringing voters to the table this time. He’s alienating parts of his constituency and the rest of the people who didn’t vote for him really hate him.
-
She’s going to win, and even if it’s close, that means she boat raced her opponent. Trump is not making friends or bringing voters to the table this time. He’s alienating parts of his constituency and the rest of the people who didn’t vote for him really hate him.
So many people basing their vote on their like/dislike of Trump instead of the important topics and their candidates position on those topics.
-
So many people basing their vote on their like/dislike of Trump instead of the important topics and their candidates position on those topics.
Yeah not saying I think it’s “right” I’m just saying we are pretty divided now and it’s either “us or them” mentality with our fellow voters.
-
Yeah not saying I think it’s “right” I’m just saying we are pretty divided now and it’s either “us or them” mentality with our fellow voters.
I think it really started back with the media and their "if you don't vote for obama it's because you're racist" narrative. Ever since then I've noticed more and more people drifting farther in either direction and digging their heels in.
-
From what I have read, Trump's overall approval rating hovers somewhere around 31%. This suggests that the other 69% of folks approve her campaign's focus on Trump's unpopularity.
Which has nothing to do with the fact she didn't start her campaign by announcing what she actually stands for and what she intends to do if elected. It's 100 percent TDS.
-
Which has nothing to do with the fact she didn't start her campaign by announcing what she actually stands for and what she intends to do if elected. It's 100 percent TDS.
She will probably get more than 1% in the primaries this time around. :-\
-
From what I have read, Trump's overall approval rating hovers somewhere around 31%. This suggests that the other 69% of folks approve her campaign's focus on Trump's unpopularity.
News straight from the C unt News Network.
-
She is really dumb.
HAHA: Jasmine Crockett is BIG MAD that JD Vance told the truth about her
https://rumble.com/v73cn2e-haha-jasmine-crockett-is-big-mad-that-jd-vance-told-the-truth-about-her.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
-
Nolte: Polls Show Democrats Losing Ground for 2026 Midterms
John Nolte
19 Dec 2025
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/12/19/nolte-polls-show-democrats-losing-ground-for-2026-midterms/
-
Whole Hog Politics: Jasmine Crockett’s Texas tornado could do damage in other states
by Chris Stirewalt 12/19/25
https://thehill.com/newsletters/whole-hog-politics/5655916-waymo-self-driving-taxi-birth/amp/
-
Another dunce. He is still the worst husband (no ex) ever.
George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸
@gtconway3d
I’m running for Congress in NY-12, my home.
We have a demented, criminal president running the country like a mob operation—government by the boss, for the boss.
We need Democratic fighters who will defend the rule of law and deliver government by the people. Join us.
https://x.com/gtconway3d/status/2008509063701864537
-
Jasmine Crockett says 'f--- you' to the Supreme Court over Texas redistricting decision
Texas representative launched Senate bid after new Texas congressional maps pushed her out of her district
By Lindsay Kornick Fox News
Published January 6, 2026
https://www.foxnews.com/media/jasmine-crocket-says-f-you-supreme-court-over-texas-redistricting-decision
-
Trump Impeachment Whistleblower Launches Senate Bid In Florida
Retired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman announced his campaign to oust GOP Sen. Ashley Moody, who was appointed to replace former Sen. Marco Rubio last year.
By Igor Bobic
Jan 27, 2026
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alexander-vindman-senate-florida_n_6978067ee4b01628ac430cf1?origin=home-latest-news-unit
-
Supreme Court Allows New California Congressional Districts That Favor Democrats
The justices had previously allowed Texas’ Republican-friendly map to be used in 2026, despite a lower court ruling that it likely discriminates on the basis of race.
Mark Sherman
Feb 4, 2026
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-allows-new-california-congressional-districts-that-favor-democrats_n_69839910e4b053ac3e171b49?origin=home-latest-news-unit
-
MAGA or GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
MAGA or GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All three of these races are considered 'toss ups.'
-
This should settle matters. Once and for all.
-
This should settle matters. Once and for all.
Biden played a full game.
Trump just finished the first quarter.
And, anyone who attended a No Kings rally, or anything of the like, their vote doesn't count.
-
This should settle matters. Once and for all.
Do you make these memes yourself or scour the internet for them?
-
This should settle matters. Once and for all.
LOL @ the demented retard muzzle Ab!
-
Do you make these memes yourself or scour the internet for them?
That one I think I got from Rachel Maddow's facebook page.
-
That one I think I got from Rachel Maddow's facebook page.
The tranny?
-
The tranny?
Think she's just an old fashioned dyke. But, I could be wrong.
-
Think she's just an old fashioned dyke. But, I could be wrong.
Ah, a good old carpet muncher, nice.
-
Do you make these memes yourself or scour the internet for them?
They are not hard to find on the internet which is where most people find memes they post.
-
They are not hard to find on the internet which is where most people find memes they post.
I have never found a meme outside the internet.
-
Demturds are DONE!
-
Demturds are DONE!
I'll believe this when I see it.
-
Biden played a full game.
Trump just finished the first quarter.
And, anyone who attended a No Kings rally, or anything of the like, their vote doesn't count.
Does that include Jan 6 and the like type rallies?
-
Does that include Jan 6 and the like type rallies?
No, only violent rioters like blm, no kings, antifa, etc
-
Does that include Jan 6 and the like type rallies?
What are "the like" type rallies of conservative that equate to No Kings / the Minneapolis chaos, and the BLM riots? The ones funded by socialist groups and foreign entities on that scale, with the sole intention of creating the illusion of unrest and division?
Don't fall back on Jan 6th you already said that.
-
What are "the like" type rallies of conservative that equate to No Kings / the Minneapolis chaos, and the BLM riots? The ones funded by socialist groups and foreign entities on that scale, with the sole intention of creating the illusion of unrest and division?
Don't fall back on Jan 6th you already said that.
Are you equating the No Kings event to BLM protests/riots?
Was the 'Minneapolis chaos' a one-time event, protest or riot or a series of them? Or was the Minneapolis Chaos an operation, launched by the Trump administration in December 2025, which was the federal immigration crackdown known as 'Operation Metro Surge.'
As a conservative, how would you define/describe a rally?
"No Kings" was a series of peaceful demonstrations, held in June and October 2025, aimed to protest alleged abuses of power and authoritarianism.
These Oct. 18, 2025, protests involved over 7 million people, making them one of the largest single-day demonstrations in U.S. history.
-
I vote republican but anybody that thinks they don’t lose ground in the mid terms is delusional. History shows us this will be the case.
-
Are you equating the No Kings event to BLM protests/riots?
Was the 'Minneapolis chaos' a one-time event, protest or riot or a series of them? Or was the Minneapolis Chaos an operation, launched by the Trump administration in December 2025, which was the federal immigration crackdown known as 'Operation Metro Surge.'
As a conservative, how would you define/describe a rally?
"No Kings" was a series of peaceful demonstrations, held in June and October 2025, aimed to protest alleged abuses of power and authoritarianism.
These Oct. 18, 2025, protests involved over 7 million people, making them one of the largest single-day demonstrations in U.S. history.
I'm an independent with a conservative slant on some issues.
No Kings was not what you described. It was funded and organized by socialist groups and foreign entities to sow division. It was not a grass roots, organic collection of folks.
Minneapolis opposition was the same thing.
But I'm not equating No Kings with BLM in terms of the violence and rioting that happened. I'm equating them in terms of their funding, goals, and desired outcomes.
-
I'm an independent with a conservative slant on some issues.
No Kings was not what you described. It was funded and organized by socialist groups and foreign entities to sow division. It was not a grass roots, organic collection of folks.
Minneapolis opposition was the same thing.
But I'm not equating No Kings with BLM in terms of the violence and rioting that happened. I'm equating them in terms of their funding, goals, and desired outcomes.
In what ways did I wrongly describe No Kings events? Unions by nature are socialist groups. You are correct there were foreign entities which were involved in No Kings. BTW foreign entity can be nothing more than a business, corporation or just a group of people outside the country. No Kings was also grassroots event. To say it was organic implies the event was spontaneous, which for most people it was not. So, I agree, it was not organic for the most part.
Seven million people participated in the "No Kings" protests in the United States on October 18, 2025. This was an increase of approximately 2 million who participated in the June 2025 event. It was one of the most attended demonstrations in American history. There were rallies in 2,700 cities in 50 states. Among other locations there were major turnouts in D.C., NY, and Oregon, etc. There was already huge political and ideological division in the U.S. before the No Kings events. A division that is likely to get even larger over the next 8 1/2 months. And there is a growing division within the Republican party.
While more specific, the Minneapolis opposition which took place in January 2026 was in fact similar to the No Kings events. A "No Kings 3.0" protest against perceived authoritarianism and advocating for civil liberties is scheduled for late March this year.
Several major labor unions organized No Kings events. One of them was the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) represents approximately 2 million members across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Another large union was The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) which represents over 1.8 million members nationwide. Locally, Oregon Education Association (OEA) organized No Kings Events. They have over 40,000 members. Another union involved in the No Kings events was the Communications Workers of America (CWA) which represents approximately 700,000 workers in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) which represents over 820,000 workers participated in No Kings events. Under the AFGE umbrella Major is the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Social Security Administration (SSA), Department of Defense (DOD), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS). AFGE is actively involved in nationwide "No Kings" rallies, protesting against executive actions that threaten the federal workforce. In addition, there were multiple private-sector labor unions and labor-affiliated groups which were heavily involved in organizing and participating in the "No Kings" protests throughout 2025.
Yes, there were foreign entities involved which primarily consisted of solidarity demonstrations organized by expat groups and local activists in over 20 countries, rather than direct foreign government involvement in organizing the U.S. protests.
-
In what ways did I wrongly describe No Kings events? Unions by nature are socialist groups. You are correct there were foreign entities which were involved in No Kings. BTW foreign entity can be nothing more than a business, corporation or just a group of people outside the country. No Kings was also grassroots event. To say it was organic implies the event was spontaneous, which for most people it was not. So, I agree, it was not organic for the most part.
Seven million people participated in the "No Kings" protests in the United States on October 18, 2025. This was an increase of approximately 2 million who participated in the June 2025 event. It was one of the most attended demonstrations in American history. There were rallies in 2,700 cities in 50 states. Among other locations there were major turnouts in D.C., NY, and Oregon, etc. There was already huge political and ideological division in the U.S. before the No Kings events. A division that is likely to get even larger over the next 8 1/2 months. And there is a growing division within the Republican party.
While more specific, the Minneapolis opposition which took place in January 2026 was in fact similar to the No Kings events. A "No Kings 3.0" protest against perceived authoritarianism and advocating for civil liberties is scheduled for late March this year.
Several major labor unions organized No Kings events. One of them was the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) represents approximately 2 million members across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Another large union was The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) which represents over 1.8 million members nationwide. Locally, Oregon Education Association (OEA) organized No Kings Events. They have over 40,000 members. Another union involved in the No Kings events was the Communications Workers of America (CWA) which represents approximately 700,000 workers in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) which represents over 820,000 workers participated in No Kings events. Under the AFGE umbrella Major is the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Social Security Administration (SSA), Department of Defense (DOD), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS). AFGE is actively involved in nationwide "No Kings" rallies, protesting against executive actions that threaten the federal workforce. In addition, there were multiple private-sector labor unions and labor-affiliated groups which were heavily involved in organizing and participating in the "No Kings" protests throughout 2025.
Yes, there were foreign entities involved which primarily consisted of solidarity demonstrations organized by expat groups and local activists in over 20 countries, rather than direct foreign government involvement in organizing the U.S. protests.
It wasn't protesting authoritarianism. It was a geriatric group therapy session at its most benign, and a complete organized and funded attempt to create division and destroy our country at its worst.
It was paid protestors plus professional agitators combined with useful idiots to keep us at odds and eventually destroy faith in capitalism. Billionaires pulling the puppet strings of the weak and feeble minded:
The No Kings protests (notably the large June 2025 and October 2025 events, with follow-ups) were broad coalitions of over 200 organizations, primarily progressive, liberal, labor, and civil rights groups coordinated by entities like Indivisible, the 50501 movement, ACLU, MoveOn, and others. They were presented as nonviolent, grassroots opposition to perceived authoritarianism under the Trump administration.
Several explicitly socialist and communist or far-left groups participated as endorsers, co-sponsors (especially at local levels), marchers, or contingent organizers, though they were not the primary coordinators or funders of the nationwide actions. Their involvement often focused on local events (e.g., New York City marches) or using the protests to recruit, educate, or push more radical messaging.
Key socialist and communist-affiliated groups that contributed or were involved include:
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA): A major socialist organization (with tens of thousands of members). DSA chapters (e.g., East Bay DSA, DSA-LA, YDSA youth wing) co-sponsored local events (like the Oakland rally), set up booths, mobilized members, and participated in marches. National DSA statements highlighted their presence at No Kings actions as opportunities to build socialist alternatives amid liberal-led protests. DSA critiqued the events as lacking strategy but saw value in harnessing liberal anger for working-class organizing.
Communist Party USA (CPUSA): The longstanding U.S. communist party endorsed and marched in several events, including prominently in New York City (with photos of CPUSA contingents shared on their site). CPUSA co-chair Joe Sims described participation as pro-democracy and anti-fascist. They were listed among endorsers on some partner lists (e.g., over 200 organizations for October), though conservative critics and some reports exaggerated this as "sponsorship" or orchestration. CPUSA emphasized joining the "millions" rather than leading.
Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL): A Marxist-Leninist group listed as a partner/organizer in Wikipedia summaries and some reports of the October protests. They participated in contingents and used events to promote anti-imperialist, anti-ICE messaging.
Freedom Socialist Party: A radical socialist group (focusing on feminism and anti-racism) co-sponsored or endorsed local events (e.g., New York), with statements calling for continued action post-protests.
Young Communist League (YCL): CPUSA's youth affiliate, active in mobilization and listed in some sponsor/endorser mentions for youth turnout.
Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO): A Marxist group tied to some coalitions (e.g., Chicago-based anti-Trump efforts) and contingents in cities like Seattle.
Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) (via Refuse Fascism): RCP-linked activists (e.g., Sunsara Taylor) participated through Refuse Fascism, which joined No Kings protests in major cities.
In summary, the protests were backed indirectly through philanthropic grants to organizing groups like Indivisible (notably from Soros-linked foundations)
-
Would Texas put this dude in office?
Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
“There are many more than two biological sexes. In fact, there are six.” - James Talarico, Democrat candidate for U.S. Senate
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2029433072563650980
-
Glad this dummy is going away.
Jasmine Crockett concedes, James Talarico wins Texas Senate primary
Kathryn Palmer and Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY
Wed, March 4, 2026
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jasmine-crockett-concedes-james-talarico-162740179.html
-
Glad this dummy is going away.
Jasmine Crockett concedes, James Talarico wins Texas Senate primary
Kathryn Palmer and Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY
Wed, March 4, 2026
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jasmine-crockett-concedes-james-talarico-162740179.html
Didn't one of her convict criminal security guards just die in a shootout with authorities?
-
Didn't one of her convict criminal security guards just die in a shootout with authorities?
Yep. Not surprised.
-
Glad this dummy is going away.
Jasmine Crockett concedes, James Talarico wins Texas Senate primary
Kathryn Palmer and Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY
Wed, March 4, 2026
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jasmine-crockett-concedes-james-talarico-162740179.html
She won't be going away. Will probably get a gig on MSNOW.
-
She won't be going away. Will probably get a gig on MSNOW.
True. I meant going away from public office.
-
The Midterm Warning Signs Are Flashing For Democrats, And Even CNN Sees It
"Republicans are actually ahead on net favorability at this by five points."
By Virginia Kruta
Apr 6, 2026 DailyWire.com
https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-midterm-warning-signs-are-flashing-for-democrats-and-even-cnn-sees-it?fbclid=IwY2xjawRBLhFleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzUzZta1V3dXN3ZFRGbnV1c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHnHlLQYx6P8dacW28LqApPQZS-KsW-bLWs2dToklG--mtYDZT3DYl8VUnsKO_aem_q7VcwoUy5xAJUXtdDvJAWg
-
The Midterm Warning Signs Are Flashing For Democrats, And Even CNN Sees It
"Republicans are actually ahead on net favorability at this by five points."
By Virginia Kruta
Apr 6, 2026 DailyWire.com
https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-midterm-warning-signs-are-flashing-for-democrats-and-even-cnn-sees-it?fbclid=IwY2xjawRBLhFleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzUzZta1V3dXN3ZFRGbnV1c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHnHlLQYx6P8dacW28LqApPQZS-KsW-bLWs2dToklG--mtYDZT3DYl8VUnsKO_aem_q7VcwoUy5xAJUXtdDvJAWg
Democrats have to pull their heads out of their asses and come up with something other than "get Trump"
-
Democrats have to pull their heads out of their asses and come up with something other than "get Trump"
They don't appear to have an agenda other than being anti-Trump. They are on the wrong side of issues related to taxes, spending, national defense, men invading women's spaces, border security, and illegal immigration.
As I've said numerous times, the only reason the GOP (which sucks) survives is because the Democrat party is so much worse. They cannot run on policy. Democrats rely on a combination of having a poorly managed/operating opponent in the GOP and keeping their base angry about something (Trump, alleged racism, illegal immigration, etc.). Plus they have lost their dang minds.
-
They don't appear to have an agenda other than being anti-Trump. They are on the wrong side of issues related to taxes, spending, national defense, men invading women's spaces, border security, and illegal immigration.
As I've said numerous times, the only reason the GOP (which sucks) survives is because the Democrat party is so much worse. They cannot run on policy. Democrats rely on a combination of having a poorly managed/operating opponent in the GOP and keeping their base angry about something (Trump, alleged racism, illegal immigration, etc.). Plus they have lost their dang minds.
Fetterman actually said his party leader is just TDS.
They have to get back to classic liberalism, which they were closer to before Trump broke them.
-
Fetterman actually said his party leader is just TDS.
They have to get back to classic liberalism, which they were closer to before Trump broke them.
Fetterman is being red-pilled. He just might quit the party. Very surprised, because I thought he was a lost cause after his stroke. Pretty remarkable recovery.
I doubt Democrats can recover. They are letting the inmates run the asylum. Just look at the leaders and mouthpieces of their party. Extremists.
-
Democrats have to pull their heads out of their asses and come up with something other than "get Trump"
Any suggestions?
-
Any suggestions?
How about discussing policies? What are they going to do to make Americans lives better? Not a select few faggots and weirdos, but all Americans. How are they going to bring down taxes? How are they going to improve infrastructure, homelessness, drug addiction, housing, etc.
Being in CA I get texts from dem candidates asking me to support them, every single time it's been about stopping Trump or getting Trump in some way. It's retarded.
Do you disagree?
-
How about discussing policies? What are they going to do to make Americans lives better? Not a select few faggots and weirdos, but all Americans. How are they going to bring down taxes? How are they going to improve infrastructure, homelessness, drug addiction, housing, etc.
Being in CA I get texts from dem candidates asking me to support them, every single time it's been about stopping Trump or getting Trump in some way. It's retarded.
Do you disagree?
I don't get texts from California democrats who are candidates asking me to support them. I get both democratic and republican candidates in Oregon asking me to support them. I also get requests for support of the democratic and republican party.
I have been around too long to believe in all the campaign promises from either republican or democratic candidates. I don't care which party you pick; all candidates tell people what they want to hear. When they are elected, they rarely deliver on all their campaign promises -- so they spend much of their time making excuses including blaming the other party for the lack of follow-through.
Here is a list of proposed democratic policies, some of which I agree with and others that I don't support:
Lowering Taxes and Increasing Income
Family Tax Credits: Expanding the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and providing tax credits for working parents.
Worker Incentives: Offering tax benefits to businesses that invest in employee training, apprenticeships, and providing a second-earner tax deduction.
Corporate Tax Changes: Proposing to end tax breaks for corporate landlords and large investors to fund housing initiatives.
Improving Housing and Reducing Homelessness
The American Homeownership Act: Aims to curb Wall Street buying single-family homes, reinvesting that revenue into building new, affordable units.
Increasing Supply: Increasing the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, encouraging Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and converting commercial properties into residential housing.
Infrastructure Investment: The LIFT America Act invests in broadband, clean energy, and drinking water.
Addressing Drug Addiction and Health
Medicare Negotiation: Continuing to lower prescription drug costs by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices.
Healthcare Access: Promoting "Medicare for Kids" to cover all children under 18 and expanding mental health and addiction services.
Infrastructure Development
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law: Continuing implementation to modernize roads, bridges, and public transit.
Clean Energy: Investing in grid resilience, water infrastructure, and electric vehicle charging networks.
-
I don't get texts from California democrats who are candidates asking me to support them. I get both democratic and republican candidates in Oregon asking me to support them. I also get requests for support of the democratic and republican party.
I have been around too long to believe in all the campaign promises from either republican or democratic candidates. I don't care which party you pick; all candidates tell people what they want to hear. When they are elected, they rarely deliver on all their campaign promises -- so they spend much of their time making excuses including blaming the other party for the lack of follow-through.
Here is a list of proposed democratic policies, some of which I agree with and others that I don't support:
Lowering Taxes and Increasing Income
Family Tax Credits: Expanding the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and providing tax credits for working parents.
Worker Incentives: Offering tax benefits to businesses that invest in employee training, apprenticeships, and providing a second-earner tax deduction.
Corporate Tax Changes: Proposing to end tax breaks for corporate landlords and large investors to fund housing initiatives.
Improving Housing and Reducing Homelessness
The American Homeownership Act: Aims to curb Wall Street buying single-family homes, reinvesting that revenue into building new, affordable units.
Increasing Supply: Increasing the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, encouraging Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and converting commercial properties into residential housing.
Infrastructure Investment: The LIFT America Act invests in broadband, clean energy, and drinking water.
Addressing Drug Addiction and Health
Medicare Negotiation: Continuing to lower prescription drug costs by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices.
Healthcare Access: Promoting "Medicare for Kids" to cover all children under 18 and expanding mental health and addiction services.
Infrastructure Development
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law: Continuing implementation to modernize roads, bridges, and public transit.
Clean Energy: Investing in grid resilience, water infrastructure, and electric vehicle charging networks.
At least you posted a link to where you plagiarized this info from. ::)
-
I don't get texts from California democrats who are candidates asking me to support them. I get both democratic and republican candidates in Oregon asking me to support them. I also get requests for support of the democratic and republican party.
I have been around too long to believe in all the campaign promises from either republican or democratic candidates. I don't care which party you pick; all candidates tell people what they want to hear. When they are elected, they rarely deliver on all their campaign promises -- so they spend much of their time making excuses including blaming the other party for the lack of follow-through.
Here is a list of proposed democratic policies, some of which I agree with and others that I don't support:
Lowering Taxes and Increasing Income
Family Tax Credits: Expanding the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and providing tax credits for working parents.
Worker Incentives: Offering tax benefits to businesses that invest in employee training, apprenticeships, and providing a second-earner tax deduction.
Corporate Tax Changes: Proposing to end tax breaks for corporate landlords and large investors to fund housing initiatives.
Improving Housing and Reducing Homelessness
The American Homeownership Act: Aims to curb Wall Street buying single-family homes, reinvesting that revenue into building new, affordable units.
Increasing Supply: Increasing the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, encouraging Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and converting commercial properties into residential housing.
Infrastructure Investment: The LIFT America Act invests in broadband, clean energy, and drinking water.
Addressing Drug Addiction and Health
Medicare Negotiation: Continuing to lower prescription drug costs by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices.
Healthcare Access: Promoting "Medicare for Kids" to cover all children under 18 and expanding mental health and addiction services.
Infrastructure Development
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law: Continuing implementation to modernize roads, bridges, and public transit.
Clean Energy: Investing in grid resilience, water infrastructure, and electric vehicle charging networks.
At least you posted a link to where you plagiarized this info from. ::)
Yeah I'd like to know where you got this from too.
-
At least you posted a link to where you plagiarized this info from. ::)
Thank you for noticing. ::) No link(s) seemed necessary. But here you go: Pew Research, YouGov, Senate Democrats, The Week, etc.
That post is just a list democrat policies or campaign talking points, promises made or used by various candidates for office and suggestions from party leadership. Essentially, these are nothing more than sales pitches, which may or may not ever come to fruition should the candidates be elected.
Do these 2024 Republican policies and campaign promises seem familiar?
In 2024 when Republicans were campaigning for office, these were their talking points and campaign promises which were comprised from various sources by the American Presidency Project.
the 2024 Republican policy platform, titled "Make America Great Again!" was officially adopted in July 2024. It is characterized by its succinct, 20-point format and a significant shift toward the "America First" priorities of Donald Trump, often using his signature all-caps rhetorical style.
Core Policy Pillars
Immigration & Border Security: The platform prioritizes "sealing" the southern border, completing the border wall, and launching the "largest deportation program in American history". It also calls for reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy and a travel ban for certain countries.
Economy & Inflation: The party vows to "end inflation" by slashing federal spending, cutting "costly and burdensome" regulations, and making the Trump Tax Cuts (TCJA) permanent. A notable new proposal is the elimination of taxes on tips for service workers.
Energy: Republicans aim to make the U.S. the world's "dominant energy producer" by lifting restrictions on oil, natural gas, and nuclear power, while terminating the "socialist Green New Deal".
Trade: The platform shifts toward protectionism, supporting "baseline tariffs" on foreign-made goods and revoking China's Most Favored Nation status to secure strategic independence.
Social & Cultural Issues
Abortion: In a major shift, the platform softens its language, removing calls for a national ban and instead stating that the power to protect "life" has been returned to the states.
Education: Policies include closing the federal Department of Education, supporting "universal school choice," and defunding schools that teach "Critical Race Theory" or "gender ideology".
Gender & Sports: The platform pledges to "end left-wing gender insanity" by keeping men out of women’s sports and banning taxpayer funding for gender-reassignment surgeries.
National Security & Government Reform
Military: Plans include building a "great Iron Dome missile defense shield" over the entire country and "modernizing" the military through cutting-edge technology.
Government Efficiency: Republicans aim to "stop the weaponization of government" by declassifying records and firing "corrupt" employees.
Election Integrity: The platform calls for securing elections through mandatory voter ID, paper ballots, and proof of citizenship.
The American Presidency Project
Jul 8, 2024 — The Republican National Committee's Platform Committee adopted former President Donald Trump's platform.
-
Yeah I'd like to know where you got this from too.
More importantly, do you disagree with these campaign promises?
-
Thank you for noticing. ::) No link(s) seemed necessary. But here you go: Pew Research, YouGov, Senate Democrats, The Week, etc.
Those aren't links.
-
They don't appear to have an agenda other than being anti-Trump. They are on the wrong side of issues related to taxes, spending, national defense, men invading women's spaces, border security, and illegal immigration.
As I've said numerous times, the only reason the GOP (which sucks) survives is because the Democrat party is so much worse. They cannot run on policy. Democrats rely on a combination of having a poorly managed/operating opponent in the GOP and keeping their base angry about something (Trump, alleged racism, illegal immigration, etc.). Plus they have lost their dang minds.
If Trump continues the way he’s going, running on that may just win them the house and senate.
-
If Trump continues the way he’s going, running on that may just win them the house and senate.
Retards will swallow up the anti Trump propaganda while offering up no solutions except "get Trump" it's lame and it's keeps us in this cycle.
-
Those aren't links.
Those aren't links.
Links to what or whom? Whomever or whichever groups and committees develop party platforms? Perhaps you mean the various campaign speeches (sales pitches) made by the many candidates seeking office? Party platforms are not written in stone rather they are fluid. Adapting to whatever will move the party forward by getting their candidates elected.
"The Democratic Party writes and adopts a new party platform at each Democratic National Convention to detail our shared Democratic values and policy priorities."
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/issues-2024/
Here is a link to information about party platforms as explained by PBS.
"What is a party platform? Here's how they're made and what you should pay attention to
Politics Jul 13, 2024 1:16 PM EDT"
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-a-party-platform-heres-how-theyre-made-and-what-you-should-pay-attention-to
-
Retards will swallow up the anti Trump propaganda while offering up no solutions except "get Trump" it's lame and it's keeps us in this cycle.
Would some recent anti-Trump MAGA folks be former Trump supporters?
-
Links to what or whom? Whomever or whichever groups and committees develop party platforms? Perhaps you mean the various campaign speeches (sales pitches) made by the many candidates seeking office? Party platforms are not written in stone rather they are fluid. Adapting to whatever will move the party forward by getting their candidates elected.
"The Democratic Party writes and adopts a new party platform at each Democratic National Convention to detail our shared Democratic values and policy priorities."
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/issues-2024/
Here is a link to information about party platforms as explained by PBS.
"What is a party platform? Here's how they're made and what you should pay attention to
Politics Jul 13, 2024 1:16 PM EDT"
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-a-party-platform-heres-how-theyre-made-and-what-you-should-pay-attention-to
Like chaos said, a link to where you plagiarized this from:
I don't get texts from California democrats who are candidates asking me to support them. I get both democratic and republican candidates in Oregon asking me to support them. I also get requests for support of the democratic and republican party.
I have been around too long to believe in all the campaign promises from either republican or democratic candidates. I don't care which party you pick; all candidates tell people what they want to hear. When they are elected, they rarely deliver on all their campaign promises -- so they spend much of their time making excuses including blaming the other party for the lack of follow-through.
Here is a list of proposed democratic policies, some of which I agree with and others that I don't support:
Lowering Taxes and Increasing Income
Family Tax Credits: Expanding the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and providing tax credits for working parents.
Worker Incentives: Offering tax benefits to businesses that invest in employee training, apprenticeships, and providing a second-earner tax deduction.
Corporate Tax Changes: Proposing to end tax breaks for corporate landlords and large investors to fund housing initiatives.
Improving Housing and Reducing Homelessness
The American Homeownership Act: Aims to curb Wall Street buying single-family homes, reinvesting that revenue into building new, affordable units.
Increasing Supply: Increasing the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, encouraging Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and converting commercial properties into residential housing.
Infrastructure Investment: The LIFT America Act invests in broadband, clean energy, and drinking water.
Addressing Drug Addiction and Health
Medicare Negotiation: Continuing to lower prescription drug costs by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices.
Healthcare Access: Promoting "Medicare for Kids" to cover all children under 18 and expanding mental health and addiction services.
Infrastructure Development
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law: Continuing implementation to modernize roads, bridges, and public transit.
Clean Energy: Investing in grid resilience, water infrastructure, and electric vehicle charging networks.
-
Like chaos said, a link to where you plagiarized this from:
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.
You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.
What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.
-
Thank you for noticing. ::) No link(s) seemed necessary. But here you go: Pew Research, YouGov, Senate Democrats, The Week, etc.
That post is just a list democrat policies or campaign talking points, promises made or used by various candidates for office and suggestions from party leadership. Essentially, these are nothing more than sales pitches, which may or may not ever come to fruition should the candidates be elected.
Do these 2024 Republican policies and campaign promises seem familiar?
In 2024 when Republicans were campaigning for office, these were their talking points and campaign promises which were comprised from various sources by the American Presidency Project.
the 2024 Republican policy platform, titled "Make America Great Again!" was officially adopted in July 2024. It is characterized by its succinct, 20-point format and a significant shift toward the "America First" priorities of Donald Trump, often using his signature all-caps rhetorical style.
Core Policy Pillars
Immigration & Border Security: The platform prioritizes "sealing" the southern border, completing the border wall, and launching the "largest deportation program in American history". It also calls for reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy and a travel ban for certain countries.
Economy & Inflation: The party vows to "end inflation" by slashing federal spending, cutting "costly and burdensome" regulations, and making the Trump Tax Cuts (TCJA) permanent. A notable new proposal is the elimination of taxes on tips for service workers.
Energy: Republicans aim to make the U.S. the world's "dominant energy producer" by lifting restrictions on oil, natural gas, and nuclear power, while terminating the "socialist Green New Deal".
Trade: The platform shifts toward protectionism, supporting "baseline tariffs" on foreign-made goods and revoking China's Most Favored Nation status to secure strategic independence.
Social & Cultural Issues
Abortion: In a major shift, the platform softens its language, removing calls for a national ban and instead stating that the power to protect "life" has been returned to the states.
Education: Policies include closing the federal Department of Education, supporting "universal school choice," and defunding schools that teach "Critical Race Theory" or "gender ideology".
Gender & Sports: The platform pledges to "end left-wing gender insanity" by keeping men out of women’s sports and banning taxpayer funding for gender-reassignment surgeries.
National Security & Government Reform
Military: Plans include building a "great Iron Dome missile defense shield" over the entire country and "modernizing" the military through cutting-edge technology.
Government Efficiency: Republicans aim to "stop the weaponization of government" by declassifying records and firing "corrupt" employees.
Election Integrity: The platform calls for securing elections through mandatory voter ID, paper ballots, and proof of citizenship.
The American Presidency Project
Jul 8, 2024 — The Republican National Committee's Platform Committee adopted former President Donald Trump's platform.
Is 2yrs out of date.
What do you agree / disagree with ?
what have they to say about Men in women's sport's & spaces ?
And child drugging / mutilation ?
Informing parents of whats happening with their children in school ?
Teaching / indoctrination of Queer type stuff - Having drag queens in school ?
Illegal immigrants- ? Whats their policy
Politicain corruption?
Judges givening lenient sentences/ let dangerous criminals out ?
Just a few things that need an answer from the Democrats
-
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.
You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.
What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.
All this bullshit just because you used ai and can't provide a link? ::)
-
Is 2yrs out of date.
What do you agree / disagree with ?
what have they to say about Men in women's sport's & spaces ?
And child drugging / mutilation ?
Informing parents of whats happening with their children in school ?
Teaching / indoctrination of Queer type stuff - Having drag queens in school ?
Illegal immigrants- ? Whats their policy
Politicain corruption?
Judges givening lenient sentences/ let dangerous criminals out ?
Just a few things that need an answer from the Democrats
It is not two years "out of date" because the Democratic (and Republican) conventions take place every four years. Both the Democratic and Republican Party adopt platforms during their conventions.
Apparently, you believe only Democrats must provide answers to loaded questions about your personal concerns. "What is good for the goose is good for the gander."
In the event you had not noticed there are events happening worldwide which are of greater concern to most people who are not so narrowly focused as you are.
My answers:
What have they to say about Men in women's sport's & spaces? At this time, nothing because I neither agree nor disagree with this which I see as a minor concern.
And child drugging/mutilation? Until you better define these two questions before I can give you a response. What category of drugs? What do you consider to be mutilation?
Informing parents of what's happening with their children in school? What is happening? Do you mean education and student performance? In my experience teachers are good at keeping parents informed about their children's educational progress. Unfortunately, too many parents seem rather uninterested in this, or they would take the time to attend parent teacher conferences.
Teaching/indoctrination of Queer type stuff - Having drag queens in school? Neither agree nor disagree. At no point as a parent, grandparent, and great-grandparent have I or my family nor during my 30-year employment for a school district witnessed what I think you mean by indoctrination or teaching of "queer type stuff." Also, I have zero experience with drag queens in school. However, whether I would agree or disagree would depend on why they are there.
Illegal immigrants? What's their policy? Given the ambiguity of your question. It is difficult to know what agreeing or disagreeing would mean. I believe when someone breaks the law, they should be afforded due process as defined in the U.S. Costitution, (rule of law). When determined by law to be in the country illegally, they should be deported. What is whose policy?
Politician corruption? I agree that corrupt politicians must dealt with. When it is determined a politician is politically or legally corrupt, they should be relieved of their position. This should apply from the top on down. No politician should be exempt or above the law, including the President.
Judges giving lenient sentences and/or letting dangerous criminals out (of prison)? I disagree. The punishment should fit the crime. Repeat offenders should be given stiffer sentences. The President's ability to pardon people who broke the law should be severely limited as opposed to what we have seen happen recently, wherein people seem to be pardoned on someone's whim. That someone often being the President.
-
It is not two years "out of date" because the Democratic (and Republican) conventions take place every four years. Both the Democratic and Republican Party adopt platforms during their conventions.
Apparently, you believe only Democrats must provide answers to loaded questions about your personal concerns. "What is good for the goose is good for the gander."
In the event you had not noticed there are events happening worldwide which are of greater concern to most people who are not so narrowly focused as you are.
My answers:
What have they to say about Men in women's sport's & spaces? At this time, nothing because I neither agree nor disagree with this which I see as a minor concern.
And child drugging/mutilation? Until you better define these two questions before I can give you a response. What category of drugs? What do you consider to be mutilation?
Informing parents of what's happening with their children in school? What is happening? Do you mean education and student performance? In my experience teachers are good at keeping parents informed about their children's educational progress. Unfortunately, too many parents seem rather uninterested in this, or they would take the time to attend parent teacher conferences.
Teaching/indoctrination of Queer type stuff - Having drag queens in school? Neither agree nor disagree. At no point as a parent, grandparent, and great-grandparent have I or my family nor during my 30-year employment for a school district witnessed what I think you mean by indoctrination or teaching of "queer type stuff." Also, I have zero experience with drag queens in school. However, whether I would agree or disagree would depend on why they are there.
Illegal immigrants? What's their policy? Given the ambiguity of your question. It is difficult to know what agreeing or disagreeing would mean. I believe when someone breaks the law, they should be afforded due process as defined in the U.S. Costitution, (rule of law). When determined by law to be in the country illegally, they should be deported. What is whose policy?
Politician corruption? I agree that corrupt politicians must dealt with. When it is determined a politician is politically or legally corrupt, they should be relieved of their position. This should apply from the top on down. No politician should be exempt or above the law, including the President.
Judges giving lenient sentences and/or letting dangerous criminals out (of prison)? I disagree. The punishment should fit the crime. Repeat offenders should be given stiffer sentences. The President's ability to pardon people who broke the law should be severely limited as opposed to what we have seen happen recently, wherein people seem to be pardoned on someone's whim. That someone often being the President.
Really & honestly why did you even bother to write that pathetic crap out.
And do stop trying to assume what I do & don't believe- as if you didn't know by now
I have Zero problem telling you or anyone else what I think & believe & I say it in straight
No nonsense talking.
Just look at your squirming non committal answers FFS just stop the political trash
Crap talking - Either answer like a grown man with commitment or don't bother at all.
I've already said I'm more than fed up with the pathetic answers.
You wish to ask me a direct question on what I think / believe I'll give you a no nonsense
Straight answer & you do the same.
Only of course you will not agree to do that.
-
Really & honestly why did you even bother to write that pathetic crap out.
And do stop trying to assume what I do & don't believe- as if you didn't know by now
I have Zero problem telling you or anyone else what I think & believe & I say it in straight
No nonsense talking.
Just look at your squirming non committal answers FFS just stop the political trash
Crap talking - Either answer like a grown man with commitment or don't bother at all.
I've already said I'm more than fed up with the pathetic answers.
You wish to ask me a direct question on what I think / believe I'll give you a no nonsense
Straight answer & you do the same.
Only of course you will not agree to do that.
Have a nice day.
-
Have a nice day.
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened & exposed you yet again.
-
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.
You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.
What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.
Is this something you drafted on your own or is it from a specific source? That's what I was asking for.
-
Is this something you drafted on your own or is it from a specific source? That's what I was asking for.
And just why are you asking for this? Whether I wrote it or not does not change what it says which is the same as the Democratic Party Platform.
-
And just why are you asking for this? Whether I wrote it or not does not change what it says which is the same as the Democratic Party Platform.
::)
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened & exposed you yet again.
-
::)
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened Owned & exposed you yet again.
Fixed !
-
And just why are you asking for this? Whether I wrote it or not does not change what it says which is the same as the Democratic Party Platform.
It does change it, for all any of us know without a link, this is all your opinion or the opinion of some other weirdo not affiliated with the party. Instead of all this back and forth, you could have just put up the links. ::)
-
::)
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened & exposed you yet again.
Hmmm, did you think my post was a response to you? It was not.
-
It does change it, for all any of us know without a link, this is all your opinion or the opinion of some other weirdo not affiliated with the party. Instead of all this back and forth, you could have just put up the links. ::)
Apparently, you were too lazy to read the links I posted. My post says basically the same thing as you would know if you would have checked.
https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2024-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/issues-2024/
-
Hmmm, did you think my post was a response to you? It was not.
HMMMMM ::)
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened & exposed you yet again.
-
HMMMMM ::)
Just as I said - you’re not man enough & neither
Brave enough to do such an open & straight answering thing.
Carry on with your silly squirming & deflecting - while decent Honourable
Men answer straight to the point.
Owened & exposed you yet again.
I could care less what you think of me. But just so you know, the folks who count, which are people who personally know me, think and say that I am an honorable and brave man. Apparently, you are not among these folks and likely never will be.
-
I could care less what you think of me. But just so you know, the folks who count, which are people who personally know me, think and say that I am an honorable and brave man. Apparently, you are not among these folks and likely never will be.
I could care less what they say & think of you..
Plain as day on here you are Terrified & totally unable to provide short consice answers
To anything you are directly asked & as you are very well aware it is not just me who says
That about you.
-
I could care less what they say & think of you..
Plain as day on here you are Terrified & totally unable to provide short consice answers
To anything you are directly asked & as you are very well aware it is not just me who says
That about you.
This is your opinion, which matters not to me. I prefer to be precise.
Concise emphasizes speed and brevity, whereas precise emphasizes accuracy and correctness.
Neither of which has any bearing on honor and manliness.
-
Apparently, you were too lazy to read the links I posted. My post says basically the same thing as you would know if you would have checked.
https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2024-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/issues-2024/
In regards to the top link...I scanned about 12 pages and saw Trumps name maybe 15-20 times. Proof that dems have no platform except get Trump.
The second link I scanned a couple of the options of where they stand and was disgusted by their supposed platform based on freedoms for all while suppressing every Americans rights.
What kind of idiot falls for their bullshit? ::)
-
This is your opinion, which matters not to me. I prefer to be precise.
Concise emphasizes speed and brevity, whereas precise emphasizes accuracy and correctness.
Neither of which has any bearing on honor and manliness.
Precise!! 🤣
That is exactly what you are Not.
Other posters are always complaining that you Deflect, Change goal posts, obfuscate
& non committal - it appears like you're embarrassed to plainly state your view/ beliefs.
As I've said many times previously ask me a straight direct question & I'll give a straight
& direct answer - Yet you are not able to make such a statement.
That's very strange you can't/ won't what are you hiding or afraid of.
-
Precise!! 🤣
That is exactly what you are Not.
Other posters are always complaining that you Deflect, Change goal posts, obfuscate
& non committal - it appears like you're embarrassed to plainly state your view/ beliefs.
As I've said many times previously ask me a straight direct question & I'll give a straight
& direct answer - Yet you are not able to make such a statement.
That's very strange you can't/ won't what are you hiding or afraid of.
Do you know the difference between precise and concise? Facts are verifiable truths, while views are interpretations, judgments, and beliefs that cannot be proven. I prefer facts over views and opinions especially in cultures such as Getbig.
I do not seek opinions from people I do not know because those opinions change nothing. Apparently, you prefer opinions.
Do you believe your above post is an example of you being either concise or precise? If so, in what ways? Isn't it just an opinion -- yours?
You said, "Ask me a straight question and I'll give you a straight and direct answer." -Nice to know. Can I hold you to this?
I don't want or need your judgment and approval for my either my beliefs or my opinions. When and if I ever do, I will be sure to ask you for it.
If I were hiding something it is unlikely you know what it is, so there is nothing for me to fear.
-
Do you know the difference between precise and concise? Facts are verifiable truths, while views are interpretations, judgments, and beliefs that cannot be proven. I prefer facts over views and opinions especially in cultures such as Getbig.
I do not seek opinions from people I do not know because those opinions change nothing. Apparently, you prefer opinions.
Do you believe your above post is an example of you being either concise or precise? If so, in what ways? Isn't it just an opinion -- yours?
You said, "Ask me a straight question and I'll give you a straight and direct answer." -Nice to know. Can I hold you to this?
I don't want or need your judgment and approval for my either my beliefs or my opinions. When and if I ever do, I will be sure to ask you for it.
If I were hiding something it is unlikely you know what it is, so there is nothing for me to fear.
Do you know the difference between them? I doubt it without having to Google it.
Yet another long boring rant.
This is Getbig & weather you want or need my judgement doesn’t remotely matter as you'll
Get it any way.
You have plenty to hide & be fearfull of your inability to be direct in your answers proves that.
-
Do you know the difference between them? I doubt it without having to Google it.[/q]
Whether Googled or looked up in a dictionary or already knew it makes no difference because each word's definition remains the same. Did you expect to raise my ire by suggesting I googled it? This is better to do that than invent their definition, like you apparently did.
Yet another long boring rant. [/q]
Like I previously said, if you do not like what I post, don't read it.
This is Getbig & weather you want or need my judgement doesn’t remotely matter as you'll
Get it any way. [/Q]
I do not expect otherwise from you.
You have plenty to hide & be fearfull of your inability to be direct in your answers proves that.
Since you think you know me so well, tell me what you think I have to hide or be fearful of.
There are many reasons one might be evasive, besides fear. For example, I might think your question is too dumb to answer, that you are asking me a question about something which is none of your business, or that you have given me reason to not trust your motives.
-
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.
You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.
What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.
I just wanted to know where you got it from. If you used AI just say so. When I'm asking for a link it's because I want to go read for myself. I cannot do that if you are using AI to feed you info then telling us you got the info from some unsourced link, then providing links that don't say exactly what you posted.
-
Since you think you know me so well, tell me what you think I have to hide or be fearful of.
There are many reasons one might be evasive, besides fear. For example, I might think your question is too dumb to answer, that you are asking me a question about something which is none of your business, or that you have given me reason to not trust your motives.
::)
Blah blah blah & on & on.
-
::)
Blah blah blah & on & on.
This is what idiots say when they are at a loss for substantive comments.
-
This is what idiots say when they are at a loss for substantive comments.
::)
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Blah Blah Blah
Well you would definitely know.
-
::)
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Blah Blah Blah
Well you would definitely know.
Thank you for exemplifying this for us. ;D
-
2WAY
@2waytvapp
“The Republican Party is in a heap of trouble, potentially,” says @MarkHalperin, citing new data points. “The midterms… could be a blue bloodbath in November. There’s plenty of time for things to change… but this could be a nightmare. They could lose control of the Senate. You’ve never heard me say that. I’ve said just the opposite. They could lose more than 30 House seats. They could lose governors’ races no one’s expecting them to lose.”
@LarryOConnor
@KevinPWalling
@2waytvapp
https://x.com/2waytvapp/status/2049673322439348245