Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: New York on May 14, 2006, 10:37:49 AM

Title: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: New York on May 14, 2006, 10:37:49 AM
I wonder how these two would pair up in a head to head battle?
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: 420 Diesel on May 14, 2006, 11:11:34 AM
strydom wins on everything but back.
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 14, 2006, 11:13:26 AM
I wonder how these two would pair up in a head to head battle?

Strydom in conditioning, shape and separation. Chick in the back (as soft as it was)!
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: The Showstoppa on May 14, 2006, 11:15:28 AM
I'd even give Strydom the nod in the hair department.  ;D
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: MisterGX on May 14, 2006, 05:03:49 PM
I'd even give Strydom the nod in the hair department.  ;D

Chic would easily smoke Strydom mainly because Gary can't pose for shit..
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: Jujoshu on May 14, 2006, 05:06:32 PM
Bob has him beat on wardrobe.
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: LuciusFox on May 14, 2006, 05:14:18 PM
 Chic wins easily. Strydom has no back.
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: Wombat on May 14, 2006, 06:38:46 PM
yeah as tight as Gary was, Chick would make him look tiny from the back...Chick has to much of an X frame to lose to the straight up and down GARy...
Title: Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
Post by: disco_stu on May 14, 2006, 07:11:18 PM
thats where the sport is at. It is a Mr.Back contest these days.

an unproportionate amount of weighting goes on the look from the rear.

it used to be used as a tie breaker, but has evolved into much more than it needs to be. Today you can win everywhere, lose on back, and lose the show.