Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the shadow on May 16, 2006, 02:42:10 AM
-
in this pic i would go with dorian yates.....
-
dorian got him on trunks. lovely color. tight fit.
-
This shot shows, how little Shawn was, great muscle quality, but it is so funny, he thought he had a chance for Sandow...
-
Shawn look's great in that pic! Hamstring's, Christmas tree looking tight!! :o
-
Dorian has him for calves for sure.
Back is closer than you would think, considering the pic is 10 years old.
The back is close on width thats about it .
-
Shawn look's great in that pic! Hamstring's, Christmas tree looking tight!! :o
Shawn looks the best in that pic
-
coleman
-
Shawn looks the best.
-
Coleman is wider and thicker. Look at the lat and trap thickness, it's not close. Yates has him in definition/dryness. Overall, I give it to coleman in this pic.
-
coleman is big .. but he is just 'hangin meat ' there.
thats the difference between coleman and dorian .. ronnie can gain size .. but only dorian could mix unearthly size and fabulous rock hard conditionin .
take a look at ronnie's 2004 olympia and see what i mean .. the crowd were shocked seein him walk down the runway with his rediculous size.. but the guy was spillin out all over the place.... he didnt flex more like oozed ! if you could put ronnie and muntzer in 'the fly' machine .. out would pop dorian to take the prize! ;D
shawn looks 'pretty' there .. but is totally swallowed by the two monsters beside him. you have to force your gaze away from dorian and ronnie to notice shawn in the middle.... and that certainly applied to the judges.
id give ronnie the emphatic nod in surpassin dorian as a bodybuilder if he could hold anywhere near that size and bring a dense , grainy , granite like package to the olympia too .. but he cant ... hes just a butcher's shop window compared to dorian's stealth bomber.
i got the 96 mr O ontape ... and its obviuos lights out as soon as dorian hits the stage.... there is no controversy.
-
coleman is big .. but he is just 'hangin meat ' there.
thats the difference between coleman and dorian .. ronnie can gain size .. but only dorian could mix unearthly size and fabulous rock hard conditionin .
take a look at ronnie's 2004 olympia and see what i mean .. the crowd were shocked seein him walk down the runway with his rediculous size.. but the guy was spillin out all over the place.... he didnt flex more like oozed ! if you could put ronnie and muntzer in 'the fly' machine .. out would pop dorian to take the prize! ;D
shawn looks 'pretty' there .. but is totally swallowed by the two monsters beside him. you have to force your gaze away from dorian and ronnie to notice shawn in the middle.... and that certainly applied to the judges.
id give ronnie the emphatic nod in surpassin dorian as a bodybuilder if he could hold anywhere near that size and bring a dense , grainy , granite like package to the olympia too .. but he cant ... hes just a butcher's shop window compared to dorian's stealth bomber.
i got the 96 mr O ontape ... and its obviuos lights out as soon as dorian hits the stage.... there is no controversy.
Dorian had no arms and no personality ::)
-
Dorian had no arms and no personality ::)
and ronnie's got no IQ.. dorian is a veritable einstein of bodybuildin compared to ronnie. ::)
dorian did it all on his own .. ronnie is just an automatom of chad ..... ''heave that dumper .. heave it'
and the thing i love about dorian more than anyone else is his INTEGRITY!
he kept himself away from the 'land of the great satan' and as such went about his business unmolested .. theres no gay for pay in his resume'. ;D
how many dicks has ronnie blown to get to the top?? ;D
any 'industry homos' tryin it on with dorian would have their heads ripped off hahahaha
'aint nothin but a peanut' .. thats was what ronnie would cry while takin it in the ass to take his mind off things ... hahaha fuckin depraved american losers!
-
yyyyyyyyyates
-
Check out the guys in the back with their tight waists and huge round chests. Now compare that to the guys of today. :-\
-
Ronnie 2000 vs Doryan 1996. Colemans might be wider but yates is thicker. Apple and the the da oranges.
-
coleman. and in this shot its obvious how much bigger colemans arms are.
colemans got the back of a fucking teenage mutant ninja turtle.
-
That's a perfect pic showing that calves aren't that significant.
-
coleman is big .. but he is just 'hangin meat ' there.
thats the difference between coleman and dorian .. ronnie can gain size .. but only dorian could mix unearthly size and fabulous rock hard conditionin .
take a look at ronnie's 2004 olympia and see what i mean .. the crowd were shocked seein him walk down the runway with his rediculous size.. but the guy was spillin out all over the place.... he didnt flex more like oozed ! if you could put ronnie and muntzer in 'the fly' machine .. out would pop dorian to take the prize! ;D
shawn looks 'pretty' there .. but is totally swallowed by the two monsters beside him. you have to force your gaze away from dorian and ronnie to notice shawn in the middle.... and that certainly applied to the judges.
id give ronnie the emphatic nod in surpassin dorian as a bodybuilder if he could hold anywhere near that size and bring a dense , grainy , granite like package to the olympia too .. but he cant ... hes just a butcher's shop window compared to dorian's stealth bomber.
i got the 96 mr O ontape ... and its obviuos lights out as soon as dorian hits the stage.... there is no controversy.
and it was the same at any o the yates was in
-
That's a perfect pic showing that calves aren't that significant.
Or that Coleman's calves, although outta proportion to his thighs, are still huge when compared to Yates (who had some of the best calves in the history of bb).....it's not that Coleman has small calves....they just look outta proportion compared to the enormity of his thighs.
-
hell my back is better and im 6feet6 im a foot taller than these juiced up bikini bitches IM ALL NATURAL (http://myspace-854.vo.llnwd.net/00300/45/87/300647854_l.jpg)
-
hell my back is better and im 6feet6 im a foot taller than these juiced up bikini bitches IM ALL NATURAL (http://myspace-854.vo.llnwd.net/00300/45/87/300647854_l.jpg)
How long did it take you to find the right light?
-
wow alexxx, what are you gonna do? he's taller than you, has a bigger back and arms, and doesnt wear a gay gold chain! time for damage control!
-
wow alexxx, what are you gonna do? he's taller than you, has a bigger back and arms, and doesnt wear a gay gold chain! time for damage control!
lol he has nothing on me!
-
How long did it take you to find the right light?
haha, no shit. That lighting is perfect.
-
if you guys read my training book you can be built like me
-
if you guys read my training book you can be built like me
(http://www.bootsnall.com/tk/images/books/gay_phrase.jpg)
im not sure how this would help us
-
coleman. and in this shot its obvious how much bigger colemans arms are.
colemans got the back of a fucking teenage mutant ninja turtle.
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman
-
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman
coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass
Smart man right here !!
-
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman
for the record, we're talking about THIS PICTURE here.
colemans back has to be at least two inches thicker than doz's (if you measured from spine outwards), and his back is also wider.
justify how hes closer to the camera, i dont see that
colemans muscles are rounder, his arms are bigger, and he IS more aesthetic than yates here.
as far as conditioning goes they look about even based on this picture (this picture is also about the shittiest screen cap you can get)
based on the two pics, the one from this thread and the front shot from the other one, coleman beats yates
-
What training book? all we need is Flex magazine
if you guys read my training book you can be built like me
-
coleman owns yates in that pic... and this waas before his peak...
so at his peak ??? ??? ??? ???
-
for the record, we're talking about THIS PICTURE here.
colemans back has to be at least two inches thicker than doz's (if you measured from spine outwards), and his back is also wider.
justify how hes closer to the camera, i dont see that
colemans muscles are rounder, his arms are bigger, and he IS more aesthetic than yates here.
as far as conditioning goes they look about even based on this picture (this picture is also about the shittiest screen cap you can get)
based on the two pics, the one from this thread and the front shot from the other one, coleman beats yates
Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .
-
Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .
Coleman is owned here though he ronster represents better asthetic
-
hell my back is better and im 6feet6 im a foot taller than these juiced up bikini bitches IM ALL NATURAL (http://myspace-854.vo.llnwd.net/00300/45/87/300647854_l.jpg)
hahaha .....some people kill me "bikini bitches" lol if coleman and dorian, in his day were in that room together you wouldnt even be able to see you kitchen lol.
-
Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .
ND we're not talking about the contest, we're not talking about the picture you posted, we're talking about the original pic at the beginning of the thread. i think overall in the picture you posted yates wins, but yates DOES NOT win in the original pic, thats just fact.
-
in this pic i would go with dorian yates.....
That's because you are BLIND!!!! Even an IDIOT can see RONNIE is light years ahead of Dorian.
In any case why are you even worried about Dorian now??? He is out of bodybuilding, weighs about 165 pounds now and will NEVER COMPETE AGAIN!!!
RONNIE COLEMAN is the now reigning MR OLYMPIA with NO COMPETITOR anywhere near him.
I hope this ends all of those Dorian Yates threads....the GREAT WHITE HOPE never was and NEVER WILL BE!!
RONNIE RULES!!!!
-
That's because you are BLIND!!!! Even an IDIOT can see RONNIE is light years ahead of Dorian.
In any case why are you even worried about Dorian now??? He is out of bodybuilding, weighs about 165 pounds now and will NEVER COMPETE AGAIN!!!
RONNIE COLEMAN is the now reigning MR OLYMPIA with NO COMPETITOR anywhere near him.
I hope this ends all of those Dorian Yates threads....the GREAT WHITE HOPE never was and NEVER WILL BE!!
RONNIE RULES!!!!
Holy M.e.l.t.d.o.w.n. batman!
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=71770.0;attach=79507;image)
Ronnie has the better taper and width, Dorian has a little better detail.
I would give the advantage to Ronnie because his taper (and arms and esp. delts from the back) is much better. Also, we cannot really see his hams and glutes in that shot, and we know that Ronnie had better hams and glutes than dorian when he was just 14 years old.
However, This just goes to illistrate how much better Ronnie was in 98 and 99 than he was in 96.
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/comp012.jpg)
here is how he looked in 1998.
Now compare the two shots.
Its obvious that ND's crazy argument that Ronnie was just as good in 96/7 as he was in 98/99 is totally retarded.
the standards simply progressed. Not taking anything away from Dorian, its just that the bar was raised.
Here is a shot from 99:
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/dungeon1986/99%20grand%20prix/more%20pics/1999BritishGrandPrix_0074.jpg)
Ronnie was even wider in 1999.
Ronnie in 1996 was not the Ronnie of 98/99.
ronnie at his peak would have crushed ND's favorite construction worker.
-
hahaha .....some people kill me "bikini bitches" lol if coleman and dorian, in his day were in that room together you wouldnt even be able to see you kitchen lol.
the top of their nasty heads wouldnt even come up to my sholder. dare to compare
-
haha, no shit. That lighting is perfect.
MY MUSCLES MAKE THE LIGHT PERFECT
-
hey waddy you left you boyfriend hanging.. adonis is the man in your relationship!? :-\
-
How long did it take you to find the right light?
LOL LMFAO, very funny reply...a classic get big zinger
-
really, looks like that was taken by candlelight.
-
Dorian's middle back is unbelievable and will always be bigger than Ronnie's even at his peak. But everything else from lats, traps, lower back go to Ronnie both in this pic and in his peak.
-
The only thing Ronnie destroys Yates on in those shots are arms....he definitely destroys Yates in arms. Although, Coleman at the '01 Arnold and '03 Mr O would most likely defeat a prime Yates (circa '93) and a prime Haney....done and done.
-
and ronnie's got no IQ.. dorian is a veritable einstein of bodybuildin compared to ronnie. ::)
dorian did it all on his own .. ronnie is just an automatom of chad ..... ''heave that dumper .. heave it'
and the thing i love about dorian more than anyone else is his INTEGRITY!
he kept himself away from the 'land of the great satan' and as such went about his business unmolested .. theres no gay for pay in his resume'. ;D
how many dicks has ronnie blown to get to the top?? ;D
any 'industry homos' tryin it on with dorian would have their heads ripped off hahahaha
'aint nothin but a peanut' .. thats was what ronnie would cry while takin it in the ass to take his mind off things ... hahaha fuckin depraved american losers!
ronnie is much smarter than you.
-
The only thing Ronnie destroys Yates on in those shots are arms....he definitely destroys Yates in arms. Although, Coleman at the '01 Arnold and '03 Mr O would most likely defeat a prime Yates (circa '93) and a prime Haney....done and done.
agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.
Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.
-
agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.
Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.
Agreed, that whole class of bbs from the early '90s was outstanding.....even the 2nd and 3rd spots could give a prime Coleman a run for his money.....Coleman just happened to peak whey they were nearing retirement.
-
ND we're not talking about the contest, we're not talking about the picture you posted, we're talking about the original pic at the beginning of the thread. i think overall in the picture you posted yates wins, but yates DOES NOT win in the original pic, thats just fact.
'
Ah not a fact just an opinion !!
-
agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.
Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.
93 Flex was probably the lowest body fat on stage, really amazing condition, but his long torso was not proportional to beat Ronnie 98.
-
93 Flex was probably the lowest body fat on stage, really amazing condition, but his long torso was not proportional to beat Ronnie 98.
agreed. I am not saying that Flex would beat Ronnie at his best.
But to me, debating about Flex beating Ronnie sure makes a whole lot more sense than debating about Dorian beating Ronnie.
Dorian is not in the same class as either Flex 93 or Ronnie 99.
(recall that Flex at the 93 Olympia was not in good condition compared to his Arnold Classic win of the same year).
-
agreed. I am not saying that Flex would beat Ronnie at his best.
But to me, debating about Flex beating Ronnie sure makes a whole lot more sense than debating about Dorian beating Ronnie.
Dorian is not in the same class as either Flex 93 or Ronnie 99.
(recall that Flex at the 93 Olympia was not in good condition compared to his Arnold Classic win of the same year).
Your logic baffles the mind , Dorian faced a Flex that was a lot sharper than the one Ronnie faced in 1998 and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol he beat a much sharper Flex & convincingly at that and Ronnie just barely beat a less that sharp Flex by just 3 points and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol you got that right ;) he was in a class all by himself , and Flex was not as sharp at the Olympa as he was at the Arnold but he was close , and a lot sharper than Flex in 1998 Olympia .
And Ronnie 99 wasn't as sharp as he was in 98 , don't you get that?
-
Your logic baffles the mind , Dorian faced a Flex that was a lot sharper than the one Ronnie faced in 1998 and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol he beat a much sharper Flex & convincingly at that and Ronnie just barely beat a less that sharp Flex by just 3 points and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol you got that right ;) he was in a class all by himself , and Flex was not as sharp at the Olympa as he was at the Arnold but he was close , and a lot sharper than Flex in 1998 Olympia .
And Ronnie 99 wasn't as sharp as he was in 98 , don't you get that?
ronnie was not as sharp in 99, but from the pics at least he looked better. ronnie 98 had poor seperation in his quads and was not nearly as full .
I have yet to see a tape of the 98 O. so I can't comment.
but in 99, based on the video (compared to 93 dorian anyway) he would crush Yates.
(http://www.kulturistika.com/gallery/1115026840_157.jpg)
he looked amazing
-
DAMN it people.. Do you have to bring the Dorian VS Ronnie topic into this thread?
-
DAMN it people.. Do you have to bring the Dorian VS Ronnie topic into this thread?
sorry :)
-
Your logic baffles the mind , Dorian faced a Flex that was a lot sharper than the one Ronnie faced in 1998 and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol he beat a much sharper Flex & convincingly at that and Ronnie just barely beat a less that sharp Flex by just 3 points and Dorian isn't in the same class? lol you got that right ;) he was in a class all by himself , and Flex was not as sharp at the Olympa as he was at the Arnold but he was close , and a lot sharper than Flex in 1998 Olympia .
And Ronnie 99 wasn't as sharp as he was in 98 , don't you get that?
You are confusing who won the contest and who most fans think looked better.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=71770.0;attach=79507;image)
Ronnie has the better taper and width, Dorian has a little better detail.
I would give the advantage to Ronnie because his taper (and arms and esp. delts from the back) is much better. Also, we cannot really see his hams and glutes in that shot, and we know that Ronnie had better hams and glutes than dorian when he was just 14 years old.
However, This just goes to illistrate how much better Ronnie was in 98 and 99 than he was in 96.
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/comp012.jpg)
here is how he looked in 1998.
Now compare the two shots.
Its obvious that ND's crazy argument that Ronnie was just as good in 96/7 as he was in 98/99 is totally retarded.
the standards simply progressed. Not taking anything away from Dorian, its just that the bar was raised.
Here is a shot from 99:
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/dungeon1986/99%20grand%20prix/more%20pics/1999BritishGrandPrix_0074.jpg)
Ronnie was even wider in 1999.
Ronnie in 1996 was not the Ronnie of 98/99.
ronnie at his peak would have crushed ND's favorite construction worker.
dude 1996 dorian vs 1996 coleman...yates wins easily .dude ur still forgeting the fact its 1996 when this pic was first released.dude 1996 means yates was crowned mr olympia and not ronnie coleman..in that pic coleman is closer to the camera and yates whole body is not even fully in that pic..the pic is a bit slanting makin yates almost out of the picture. yates crushed a fuckin 2 bit negro in that pic.i never liked coleman small..and yes he never was an aesthetic bodybuilder..small is a curse for coleman.mass=coleman..coleman means mass and aesthetics suck when coleman tries to b one..i never liked coleman before 1998..after 1998 coleman was is the best..so as far 1996 goes coleman SUCKED
-
lol he has nothing on me!
Your so gay alex he has everything on you.
-
dude 1996 dorian vs 1996 coleman...yates wins easily .dude ur still forgeting the fact its 1996 when this pic was first released.dude 1996 means yates was crowned mr olympia and not ronnie coleman..in that pic coleman is closer to the camera and yates whole body is not even fully in that pic..the pic is a bit slanting makin yates almost out of the picture. yates crushed a fuckin 2 bit negro in that pic.i never liked coleman small..and yes he never was an aesthetic bodybuilder..small is a curse for coleman.mass=coleman..coleman means mass and aesthetics suck when coleman tries to b one..i never liked coleman before 1998..after 1998 coleman was is the best..so as far 1996 goes coleman SUCKED
Coleman was an aesthetic bodybuilder. ::)
-
Sorry but can't get much better than this. And this was 30+ years ago
-
Sorry but can't get much better than this. And this was 30+ years ago
the good old times.
-
Sorry but can't get much better than this. And this was 30+ years ago
Soft glutes ::)
-
Soft glutes ::)
and hams
-
Soft glutes ::)
you're just upset that they are covered
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/nerrt.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/ipkiss/newjob.jpg)
in afew years i think his back will be up with the best of them imo
-
you're just upset that they are covered
I'm glad they're covered. I don't like to see playdough soft glutes onstage ;D
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=50200.0;id=51394;image)
:o :o :o
now who has the better back? 8)
-
(http://www.bodybuilders.com/dorian3.jpg)
Brutal arms ::)