Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 09:58:12 AM

Title: This is morphed, right?
Post by: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 09:58:12 AM
(http://www.emusclemag.com/gallery/main/wheeler_01.jpg)

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: davidpaul on August 08, 2006, 09:59:39 AM
(http://www.emusclemag.com/gallery/main/wheeler_01.jpg)

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose

Not morphed, that's when flex started using excessive esceline/synthol.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 10:31:57 AM
no it's morphed. I am embarrassed now to even question it.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 08, 2006, 11:56:45 AM
no way, that shyt aint morphed. wheeler was actually that big at a certain time
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: lastrep on August 08, 2006, 11:59:50 AM
Not morphed.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: IceCold on August 08, 2006, 12:07:57 PM
morphed.  only a bit though.  his arms and shoulders were never that big even with all the synthol.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Playboy on August 08, 2006, 12:11:41 PM
(http://www.emusclemag.com/gallery/main/wheeler_01.jpg)

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose
Nope, he looks phenomenal there. He is syntholed up though.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: davidpaul on August 08, 2006, 12:31:48 PM
no way morphed
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: phyxsius on August 08, 2006, 09:21:16 PM
It's real..
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: kmhphoto on August 08, 2006, 09:40:21 PM
no it's morphed. I am embarrassed now to even question it.

That's not a morphed image.
Morphing is the tranisition between 2 images.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Mobil on August 08, 2006, 10:03:38 PM
i think that one pic truely showed how much synthol he used. zero definition in the arms and delts, yet striations in the quads... anyways i would love to look like that synthol or not, not many people have an eye for synthol use.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: kmhphoto on August 08, 2006, 10:22:55 PM
hmf...a lesson in semantics here Kevin?

Is the photo altered?  ???

No, semantics is the study of meaning. Calling a single image morphed is wrong.
As for it being photoshopped........ ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Rottmag on August 08, 2006, 10:36:04 PM
I don't remember Flex's shoulder/arm region being that dominant.

I say "tampered with."
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 08, 2006, 11:32:25 PM
Slightly 'shopped.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: New York on August 09, 2006, 02:26:15 AM
Not morphed. I think that pic is from '99.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: kyomu on August 09, 2006, 03:19:46 AM
I dont believe he used synthol. Because he had striations in his shoulder when he hits MM.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Dorian 01 on August 09, 2006, 03:51:37 AM
I dont believe he used synthol. Because he had striations in his shoulder when he hits MM.
So you don't believe him when he says he used it?
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: rocket on August 09, 2006, 04:09:44 AM
Its photoshopped.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Mobil on August 09, 2006, 06:08:34 AM
Its photoshopped.

i dont know... if you watch battle for the olympia 99  his arms and shoulders look as big as they do in that pic
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 09, 2006, 06:13:40 AM
That's not a morphed image.
Morphing is the tranisition between 2 images.



these guys probably never seen a bodybuilder in person. they cant tell whether a photo is morphed or not. shame
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: kyomu on August 09, 2006, 06:18:10 AM
So you don't believe him when he says he used it?
Oh he said? Thats news to me. If everybody know that he said,im sorry for my ignorance.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: LyricTenor on August 09, 2006, 07:29:41 AM
It's not morphed.  His arms have always been huge and his shoulders have synthol in them.  Nothing looks stretched or warped (the way pictures do when morphed). 
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: ribonucleic on August 09, 2006, 07:39:03 AM
Head too small.

Morphed.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Rambone on August 09, 2006, 07:58:00 AM
Looks slightly morphed, especially his right lower part of his delt by his arm
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Bronx on August 09, 2006, 08:09:45 AM
I'm looking at the original as we speak...trust me folks, that pic is not "liquified"
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: rocket on August 09, 2006, 08:11:47 AM
My problem with the photo is that particularly the left (his right) bicep is ridiculously huge, like bigger than coleman has ever had.
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Scimowser on August 09, 2006, 08:19:40 AM
yes it is, and its because of the oil he used as opposed to it being morphed. I dont know how he did it, but he made synthol look great on him.

I remember him saying in MD that his quads were 33.5"
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: ARMZ on August 09, 2006, 11:07:23 AM
Are these pictures morphed photoshopped Kevin? ???

 ;D


Those are real.. He was on more stuff at that show, so they might look morphed.. His arms were almost 30"
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: kmhphoto on August 09, 2006, 11:09:10 AM
Are these pictures morphed photoshopped Kevin? ???

 ;D

Only the second one ;D
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Scimowser on August 09, 2006, 11:12:03 AM
nah, those were pics of him 2 weeks out but he overdieted and came in too small  ;D
Title: Re: This is morphed, right?
Post by: Matt C on August 09, 2006, 11:17:09 AM
.