Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Armageddon on August 24, 2006, 07:28:49 AM

Title: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Armageddon on August 24, 2006, 07:28:49 AM
Lance Armstrong and Matthew McConaughey
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: sarcasm on August 24, 2006, 07:29:54 AM
they look like they don't weigh 250lbs. together, hahahaha, what a couple of queers.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mars on August 24, 2006, 07:31:18 AM
Yessssssss, how can anybody win something when he looks so small?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: LAMA-PAI on August 24, 2006, 07:33:23 AM
AM SURE THEY GET MORE ASS THEN ANY OF US !
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Lord Humungous on August 24, 2006, 07:33:28 AM
Yessssssss, how can anybody win something when he looks so small?

You won Sarcasms love at a body weight of 135lbs
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: andre_avigdor on August 24, 2006, 07:38:10 AM
they look like they don't weigh 250lbs. together, hahahaha, what a couple of queers.

Yeah, I'm sure that they wish they could post on an internet forum all day, and write about teenagers working out.  Looks like you've really showed them.  You're the real winner here: You know that.   Keep up the good fight. 
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mars on August 24, 2006, 07:39:38 AM
Yeah, I'm sure that they wish they could post on an internet forum all day, and write about teenagers working out.  Looks like you've really showed them.  You're the real winner here: You know that.   Keep up the good fight. 

You are just bittered you look worser then these little bitches.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Karl Kox on August 24, 2006, 07:40:52 AM
well how did he look with drugs ?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: anvil on August 24, 2006, 07:42:54 AM
well how did he look with drugs ?

The same.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: andre_avigdor on August 24, 2006, 07:43:32 AM
You are just bittered you look worser then these little bitches.

Yeah, that's it.  You just showed me.  Good for you.  Say, how much time would you say you do this everyday?  You know, come on getbig (or any other forum), and post nonsense.  "Hey complete stranger, Sarcasm is better than you becasue..."  I don't know, seems kind of like a pathetic existence.  Anyways, how much time each day?  


Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: davidpaul on August 24, 2006, 07:44:02 AM
You are just bittered you look worser then these little bitches.

you always stick up for husband, you must really love him.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: gatrainer on August 24, 2006, 07:45:14 AM
photoshopped
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 07:45:27 AM
Lance Armstrong and Matthew McConaughey





two rich boys who dont give a monkey crap what people are saying about them..hmm
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: davidpaul on August 24, 2006, 07:48:00 AM
they look like they don't weigh 250lbs. together, hahahaha, what a couple of queers.

another bitter post from getbig's resident sad fuc.k.

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 07:50:49 AM
lance armstrong wasn't any bigger when he was competting. In fact, he looks bigger now than before
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: davidpaul on August 24, 2006, 07:52:03 AM
lance armstrong wasn't any bigger when he was competting. In fact, he looks bigger now than before

I didn't know they were bodybuilders. ::)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: andre_avigdor on August 24, 2006, 07:54:10 AM
another bitter post from getbig's resident sad fuc.k.




Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 07:56:13 AM
I didn't know they were bodybuilders. ::)




lol....it seems like they are discussing that these two guys were suppose to look like bodybuilders...
for the record...Matthew is an A-list actor, and Armstrong is still very rich. Those guys dont give a fcuk about me, why should their physique be matter to me. shyt
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: davidpaul on August 24, 2006, 07:57:11 AM

Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.

he is also unemployed. :'(
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 07:57:37 AM

Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.



Are you serious?  ;D
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: davidpaul on August 24, 2006, 07:58:26 AM


Are you serious?  ;D

you didn't know this?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: andre_avigdor on August 24, 2006, 07:59:58 AM
All cool dudes justify their existence on an internet forum.  I thought you knew.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 08:01:04 AM
you didn't know this?



I thought he was gonna tell me something I didn't already know.. ;D
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Rich2 on August 24, 2006, 08:02:35 AM
wow, it must suck being arguably the world's greatest cyclist or a world famous movie star. they're obviously not true iron warriors and addicted to mind-blowing pumps like us.


gay
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: 1Fast400 on August 24, 2006, 08:07:42 AM
Yeah lance is a pussy.  I mean come on, he only beat nut/brain cancer and won one of the most demanding physical events in the world 7x.  For an individual sport, I don't think there is anything on it's level.  He's a genetic freak.  Want proof, go look when he was at ASU after coming off cancer.  They put him in their sports program to see how he would respond to training.  He blew away every record they had after just 3 weeks of training.  That's coming off cancer.  Dude was an animal. 
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Bluto on August 24, 2006, 08:08:45 AM
whats the point with this thread? another chance for fat sarcasm to say someone is skinny when in reality he cant walk up a couple of stairs without catching his breath? im surprised he even have enough cardio to type on the keyboard
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: anvil on August 24, 2006, 08:10:51 AM
wow, it must suck being arguably the world's greatest cyclist or a world famous movie star. they're obviously not true iron warriors and addicted to mind-blowing pumps like us.


gay

Exactly, I bet matthew is tired of getting the hottest snatch available anywhere he goes and is probably bored with having multiple millions in the bank too.  What a loser homo, he'd surely want to trade places with any of us  8)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 08:14:24 AM
Yeah lance is a pussy.  I mean come on, he only beat nut/brain cancer and won one of the most demanding physical events in the world 7x.  For an individual sport, I don't think there is anything on it's level.  He's a genetic freak.  Want proof, go look when he was at ASU after coming off cancer.  They put him in their sports program to see how he would respond to training.  He blew away every record they had after just 3 weeks of training.  That's coming off cancer.  Dude was an animal. 




Hats off to him all the way, SIR
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Faust on August 24, 2006, 08:19:37 AM
Yeah lance is a pussy.  I mean come on, he only beat nut/brain cancer and won one of the most demanding physical events in the world 7x.  For an individual sport, I don't think there is anything on it's level.  He's a genetic freak.  Want proof, go look when he was at ASU after coming off cancer.  They put him in their sports program to see how he would respond to training.  He blew away every record they had after just 3 weeks of training.  That's coming off cancer.  Dude was an animal. 

Agreed, i don't know the exact parameters, but tests on hims show that he has unique capabilities for endurance/recuperation, milehigh above average. He's a genetic freak. (He still was doped, make no mistake about it.)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Joey Tito on August 24, 2006, 08:36:58 AM
This thread started with the charge that Lance was doping.  Just out of curiosity, how would he have kept from being caught all those years?  Was he using some undetectable hormone or something?  I'd be curious to hear some opinions.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: 240 is Back on August 24, 2006, 08:40:52 AM
I wonder what lance's cycle looks like these days?


get it? cycle?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Bluto on August 24, 2006, 08:53:18 AM
i was going to post a pic of sheryl crowe and write something like "yeah and he got to bang this" but i realized when searching for pics on google that she's not that hot
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Palpatine Q on August 24, 2006, 08:54:28 AM
I wonder what lance's cycle looks like these days?


get it? cycle?


NIce
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Big N on August 24, 2006, 08:58:31 AM
they look like they don't weigh 250lbs. together, hahahaha, what a couple of queers.

lol


Those pix looks so gay bro
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: 240 is Back on August 24, 2006, 09:02:52 AM
Those pix looks so gay bro

True, but matthew mcConeghey turns down more poon on his way to the bus stop in the morning than most of us will score in a lifetime. 
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Fury on August 24, 2006, 09:05:45 AM
Agreed, i don't know the exact parameters, but tests on hims show that he has unique capabilities for endurance/recuperation, milehigh above average. He's a genetic freak. (He still was doped, make no mistake about it.)


I remember reading about some test showing that his lungs are bigger than the average person and he is able to draw a lot more into his body. He's a genetic freak.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Wiggs on August 24, 2006, 09:15:05 AM
Yeah lance is a pussy.  I mean come on, he only beat nut/brain cancer and won one of the most demanding physical events in the world 7x.  For an individual sport, I don't think there is anything on it's level.  He's a genetic freak.  Want proof, go look when he was at ASU after coming off cancer.  They put him in their sports program to see how he would respond to training.  He blew away every record they had after just 3 weeks of training.  That's coming off cancer.  Dude was an animal. 

you know what that says to me??????

ALL DRUGS  Genetic freak my left nut!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Big N on August 24, 2006, 09:17:01 AM
True, but matthew mcConeghey turns down more poon on his way to the bus stop in the morning than most of us will score in a lifetime. 


We cant give up our hopes too soon bro. $$$ can buy us groupies which is something that celebs cant do because of bad press, its all a GAME baby!  ;D
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mars on August 24, 2006, 09:24:06 AM
But the big question is, why are they so tiny? don't they have good nutrition?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:28:30 AM
Hah the best part about this thread is 99 percent of the hottest women on the planet would take mconehay over any bodybuilder ever lol!!

I love being a jacked swimmer!

And as for armstrong he is a real athlete. he may be small but he actually was the best ever at a proffesional sport :-*
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mars on August 24, 2006, 09:30:37 AM
Hah the best part about this thread is 99 percent of the hottest women on the planet would take mconehay over any bodybuilder ever lol!!

I love being a jacked swimmer!

And as for armstrong he is a real athlete. he may be small but he actually was the best ever at a proffesional sport :-*

Maybe his cycle has a little motor in it?
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: JDK on August 24, 2006, 09:30:50 AM
Agreed, i don't know the exact parameters, but tests on hims show that he has unique capabilities for endurance/recuperation, milehigh above average. He's a genetic freak. (He still was doped, make no mistake about it.)


lance was an average cyclist for the long tournaments like tour de france before his "cancer treatment". i mean of course you are a heck of a cyclist if you can just start there, but cīmon, he wasnīt even a threat to crack top 20 at the tour.
then all of a sudden he is way and ahead of the whole pack......
he was definetely eye to eye with ronnie on performance enhancing drugs.

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:35:17 AM
lance was an average cyclist for the long tournaments like tour de france before his "cancer treatment". i mean of course you are a heck of a cyclist if you can just start there, but cīmon, he wasnīt even a threat to crack top 20 at the tour.
then all of a sudden he is way and ahead of the whole pack......
he was definetely eye to eye with ronnie on performance enhancing drugs.

Haha what a hater! Ronnie just had average genetics until he found a new brand growth hormone to allow him to have better genetics than anyone else ::) Genetic potential or talent can be achieved later on in a career. I bet you know lance personally and are some kind of authority in the cycling world! Lance realized his potential and kicked the shit out of the rest of the world 7 years straight. Until you get proof of your claims except it.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:38:38 AM
Maybe his cycle has a little motor in it?

I suspect in the seat mars. Either that or they implanted one in each leg. The French feel very confident they have a credible lead about the leg moter implants!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mars on August 24, 2006, 09:41:32 AM
Yes that has to be it.
And maybe he pretends he's sweating? so much drugs and so tiny and not even being capable to win something natural.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bigtraps on August 24, 2006, 09:45:03 AM
Just looks like 2 dorks to me.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: walking sculpture on August 24, 2006, 09:45:21 AM
HA HA...This thread is one big Meltdown!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:46:30 AM
Yes that has to be it.
And maybe he pretends he's sweating? so much drugs and so tiny and not even being capable to win something natural.

I suspect they deflate most the glycogen from his muscle before a race. Making his muscles appear to be 15 times smaller than normal. The french seem to have a lead which told them Lance actually walks around as a guy named "Jay Cutler" when he is not racing. Obviously the vacuum technique has dramatic results on Lances body making him lose up to 200 drug induced pounds of muscle.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: JDK on August 24, 2006, 09:47:34 AM
Haha what a hater! Ronnie just had average genetics until he found a new brand growth hormone to allow him to have better genetics than anyone else ::) Genetic potential or talent can be achieved later on in a career. I bet you know lance personally and are some kind of authority in the cycling world! Lance realized his potential and kicked the shit out of the rest of the world 7 years straight. Until you get proof of your claims except it.

i could have put any name of an ifbb pro there instead of ronnie. just wanted you to realize what horrid amount of drugs is taken by top cyclists.
hey iīm all for drugs in pro sports. i found it ridiculous, that they suspended the guys who would have won the tour this year, Ulrich and Basso, just because there was evidence that they took test, epo, insulin, growth hormone and whatever else.
everyone in their right mind knows that the rest of the field takes shit, too. if they wanted to clean out, they should have cancelled the whole tournament.


the greatest genetic freak in cycling in the last decade or so is Ulrich, which is proven by performance tests, and he was/is a proven heavy drug user. so lance definetly NOT being genetically superior to Ulrich  and beating the shit out of him in france every year shows something......
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 09:53:07 AM
this thread is getting dumber and dumber
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: kiwiol on August 24, 2006, 09:56:15 AM

Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.

An dry-Assrider!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How dare you commit heresay by posting such derogatory comments about the mightiest legend and the exalted leader of the almighty SQUAD, the great Sarcasm, and still be stupid enough to have not deleted your account and killed yourself due to the fact that your behaviour has led you to be included in the almighty SQUAD's hitlist, the very mention of which sends shivers down the spine of countless tiny little tits like you, whereever they happen to be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hahahahahaha oh brother, I bet you are the kind of 'guy' who is commonly seen holding a sign that says 'Need a 'ride', heading south. Only musclebear drivers please', in national highway 22, which has the most amount of truckies passing through. And when the first musclebear driver pulls over and says he won't mind giving you a 'ride', you immediately pull your pants down, bend over and giggling like a schoolgirl, say, "Gotchaaaaa ! When I said 'ride', I meant this kinda ride right here. And when you're done stud, would you be a kind man and give a nasty little bottom bitch like me a lift to the truck stop glory hole located 15 miles south of here? I hear you get the best cock there in the whole country" as you smack your lips loudly, much to the disgust of the driver. Hahahahahahaha gayer than Solar Energy.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:57:53 AM
Check out these French spy photos of Lance before and after the newly discovered muscle vacuuming process. When asked in the second picture about his vastly different appearance lance claimed he did not understand french and ran!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 24, 2006, 09:59:31 AM
An dry-Assrider!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How dare you commit heresay by posting such derogatory comments about the mightiest legend and the exalted leader of the almighty SQUAD, the great Sarcasm, and still be stupid enough to have not deleted your account and killed yourself due to the fact that your behaviour has led you to be included in the almighty SQUAD's hitlist, the very mention of which sends shivers down the spine of countless tiny little tits like you, whereever they happen to be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hahahahahaha oh brother, I bet you are the kind of 'guy' who is commonly seen holding a sign that says 'Need a 'ride', heading south. Only musclebears drivers please', in national highway 22, which has the most amount of truckies passing through. And when the first musclebear driver pulls over and says he won't mind giving you a 'ride', you immediately pull your pants down, bend over and giggling like a schoolgirl, say, "Gotchaaaaa ! When I said 'ride', I meant this kinda ride right here. And when you're done stud, would you be a kind man and give a nasty little bottom bitch like me a lift to the truck stop glory hole located 15 miles south of here? I hear you get the best cock there in the whole country" as you smack your lips loudly, much to the disgust of the driver. Hahahahahahaha gayer than Solar Energy.



lol....slow down Kiwiol, you're killing him ;D ;D
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 24, 2006, 10:17:30 AM
what's the fucking point of having a low heart rate and being able to run a marthon if you look like those flabby bone sacks??????????

FUCK THAT. I'd rather be a 300 lbs monster who has to catch his breath half way up a flight of stairs.

Life's too short to run around looking like a pre-pubescent girl.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: kiwiol on August 24, 2006, 10:18:31 AM
what's the fucking point of having a low heart rate and being able to run a marthon if you look like those flabby bone sacks??????????

f**k THAT. I'd rather be a 300 lbs monster who has to catch his breath half way up a flight of stairs.

Life's too short to run around looking like a pre-pubescent girl.

A man after my own heart 8)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: w8tlftr on August 24, 2006, 10:21:46 AM
what's the fucking point of having a low heart rate and being able to run a marthon if you look like those flabby bone sacks??????????

f**k THAT. I'd rather be a 300 lbs monster who has to catch his breath half way up a flight of stairs.

Life's too short to run around looking like a pre-pubescent girl.

Your life will be even shorter if you have to stop to catch your breath while climbing a flight of stairs.  ::)

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 24, 2006, 10:30:26 AM
Your life will be even shorter if you have to stop to catch your breath while climbing a flight of stairs.  ::)



Is this what a man's supposed to look like? I see these wankers everywhere with their i-pods strapped to their 10 inch arm checking their heart-rate monitors to see if they're in that "cardio zone". And it's not like they have fit looking physiques. They're bony and flabby! Every year they just get bonnier and flabbier. If you're doing all that cardio you'd think they'd be cut but no. No physical presence - nothing to show for their efforts.

I'd rather be able to squat a car and die before 60 then live to 100 being weak, defenceless, and completely lacking a physical presence.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=90615.0;attach=98067;image)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Joey Tito on August 24, 2006, 10:30:45 AM
I remember reading about some test showing that his lungs are bigger than the average person and he is able to draw a lot more into his body. He's a genetic freak.

Well, by that standard King Kamali is a genetic freak for being able to ingest two 12 inch erectile penises at once.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: oldtimer1 on August 24, 2006, 10:46:28 AM
 The rumors are that Lance is training for a marathon.  He was a tri athlete prior to being a pure bike racer.  He is also a really good swimmer.  I think running was his weakest part of his tri athlete days. I think he's is in for a shock if he tries to keep up with the African runners who are dominating almost all the big marathon races. They are running sub 5 minute miles for 26 miles.  Try one sub 5 minute mile on your treadmill if it will even go that fast.

They are built like middle to light heavy boxers.  I don't see any running backs,boxers, Olympic wrestlers, MMA fighters,sprinters, or Olympic weight lifters built like the current cosmetic drug bodybuilders. They have real physiques.  A real athlete cares about function not cosmetics through pharmaceuticals.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on August 24, 2006, 10:51:54 AM
you know what that says to me??????

ALL DRUGS  Genetic freak my left nut!

I'm trying to figure out which post is the most retarded of the two....this one or.........
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on August 24, 2006, 10:53:54 AM
what's the fucking point of having a low heart rate and being able to run a marthon if you look like those flabby bone sacks??????????

f**k THAT. I'd rather be a 300 lbs monster who has to catch his breath half way up a flight of stairs.

Life's too short to run around looking like a pre-pubescent girl.

...........this one :-\!!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Faust on August 24, 2006, 11:35:14 AM
the greatest genetic freak in cycling in the last decade or so is Ulrich, which is proven by performance tests, and he was/is a proven heavy drug user. so lance definetly NOT being genetically superior to Ulrich  and beating the shit out of him in france every year shows something......

I believe Armstrong's tests were actually better than Ulrich's. A lot of people say that Ulrich is more talented than Armstrong, but this is debatable. His technique of riding seems more fluent, but that's about it... I have no doubt in my mind that both of them were doped up to the extreme, i was just pointing out that Lance has great genetics.

Also: you said that Lance didnt win anything before his cancer. This is also not true at all. When he was young he did triathlons and excelled at them. I believe due to shoulder problems he switched to his best part: cycling. Before cancer he won several big events, became world champion. Problem was that he wasnt really focussed and he weighed too much. He didn't train for the big Tours either, just for the one-day courses.

Only after the cancer he gained the focus, drive to prepare for the Tour de france. Ulrich never had that and was overweight almost every time the Tour began. Lance's fanatical training gave him the edge.

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on August 24, 2006, 11:40:54 AM
Drugs are more prevalent in world class cycling than they are in bodybuilding. Anyone that thinks Armstrong wasn't doped to the gills is in for a big surprise this year when Santa Claus doesn't actually come down the chimney.

That being said his accomplishments are incredible. To be the best at anything in the world 7 times in a row is astonishing.

He was doping but so was his competition, so ultimately it's a wash.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Lee_a_priest on August 24, 2006, 12:42:40 PM
The same.
Yes you would see him here in Austin TX he looked the same big deal.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: w8tlftr on August 24, 2006, 12:46:57 PM
Is this what a man's supposed to look like? I see these wankers everywhere with their i-pods strapped to their 10 inch arm checking their heart-rate monitors to see if they're in that "cardio zone". And it's not like they have fit looking physiques. They're bony and flabby! Every year they just get bonnier and flabbier. If you're doing all that cardio you'd think they'd be cut but no. No physical presence - nothing to show for their efforts.

I'd rather be able to squat a car and die before 60 then live to 100 being weak, defenceless, and completely lacking a physical presence.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=90615.0;attach=98067;image)

Fact is, they are fit and do have fit physiques. Not everyone wants to be a muscular bodybuilder and they shouldn't be critisized for it. At least they are not fat pigs, right?

Additionally, don't be so quick to assume that someone is weak and defenseless because they don't have 18 inch arms. I've met quite a few guys that were boxers and martial artists who are skinny by BB standards but who are capable of easily beating the living crap out of someone. Being big does not equate to being a lethal badass.



Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Hedgehog on August 24, 2006, 12:54:14 PM
Every year during his spring preparation for the Tour, Armstrong would go and cycle the entire Tour, every stage.

He went the extra mile to win.

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: onlyme on August 24, 2006, 01:03:39 PM
lance armstrong wasn't any bigger when he was competting. In fact, he looks bigger now than before

synthol
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: jwb on August 24, 2006, 01:17:31 PM
These guys have better calves than half the IFBB pro division though...
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: JDK on August 24, 2006, 01:30:05 PM

Only after the cancer he gained the focus, drive to prepare for the Tour de france. Ulrich never had that and was overweight almost every time the Tour began. Lance's fanatical training gave him the edge.



sad but true (as kind of an ulrich fan) :'(

but thats why i like him, too. he is a normal guy who just couldnīt lay off the extra donut. feel some kind of sympathy for that. :)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: andre_avigdor on August 24, 2006, 07:57:51 PM
An dry-Assrider!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How dare you commit heresay by posting such derogatory comments about the mightiest legend and the exalted leader of the almighty SQUAD, the great Sarcasm, and still be stupid enough to have not deleted your account and killed yourself due to the fact that your behaviour has led you to be included in the almighty SQUAD's hitlist, the very mention of which sends shivers down the spine of countless tiny little tits like you, whereever they happen to be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hahahahahaha oh brother, I bet you are the kind of 'guy' who is commonly seen holding a sign that says 'Need a 'ride', heading south. Only musclebear drivers please', in national highway 22, which has the most amount of truckies passing through. And when the first musclebear driver pulls over and says he won't mind giving you a 'ride', you immediately pull your pants down, bend over and giggling like a schoolgirl, say, "Gotchaaaaa ! When I said 'ride', I meant this kinda ride right here. And when you're done stud, would you be a kind man and give a nasty little bottom bitch like me a lift to the truck stop glory hole located 15 miles south of here? I hear you get the best cock there in the whole country" as you smack your lips loudly, much to the disgust of the driver. Hahahahahahaha gayer than Solar Energy.


Too much sadness for me to read through.  If you want, you can summarize this story in a sentence. 
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: pobrecito on August 24, 2006, 08:03:30 PM
Armstrong has been making 12+ million each year for about the past 5-6 years. Not a bad living, eh? ;)

As to the doping allegations, they are nothing more than that, allegations.

Armstrong was drug tested more than any other athlete in history and never tested positive once. Ullrich tested positive, as well as this year's winner, Landis.

The way Armstrong trained was similar to the way Coleman trains, no one even comes close.

While ullrich was busy getting high on E, Armstong was riding up L'Alpe D'Huez ;)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: delta9mda on August 24, 2006, 08:54:47 PM
Yessssssss, how can anybody win something when he looks so small?
size does not matter for bike racing. lance looks no diff than before.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: dirk digler on August 24, 2006, 08:57:48 PM
Is this what a man's supposed to look like? I see these wankers everywhere with their i-pods strapped to their 10 inch arm checking their heart-rate monitors to see if they're in that "cardio zone". And it's not like they have fit looking physiques. They're bony and flabby! Every year they just get bonnier and flabbier. If you're doing all that cardio you'd think they'd be cut but no. No physical presence - nothing to show for their efforts.

I'd rather be able to squat a car and die before 60 then live to 100 being weak, defenceless, and completely lacking a physical presence.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=90615.0;attach=98067;image)
Physical presence? Spoken like a true bber. I'd rather be an athlete. Lance has power, speed and stength. Armstrong reached the top of Le Alpe du Huez in just over 40 minutes. That's nine miles basically straight up (7% grade). Estimates say he was pushin' over 800 watts. A typical cyclyst does about 400. Most recreational cyclists cannot even make it up without walking.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bic_staedtler on August 24, 2006, 09:01:58 PM
...well, nothing as sad as watching two metro's running around with their shirts off....what, it's too heavy?...wearing the shirts and all?  Come on if this wasn't a huge egotistical driven PHOTO ME PLEASE, WE'RE SINGLE then I don't know what is.

Yeah, money, pussy, whatever.  They can't nail as many ho's as us BECAUSE of their cash....what, you think these guys nail chicks left and right?  No more than most of us here with booty calls, these celebs are CONSTANTLY being hunted by professional goldiggers...go as KOBE!

And Lance is just a token drug user no different from our own CHAMP, Ronnie Coleman.  He overcame great odds, it's true.  But he's a cheat who wasn't caught.  Deal with it.  

Now go take your shirts off, and 'run' from the media...just like those two!

Except for you, Vince.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: dirk digler on August 24, 2006, 09:04:59 PM

And Lance is just a token drug user no different from our own CHAMP, Ronnie Coleman.  He overcame great odds, it's true.  But he's a cheat who wasn't caught.  Deal with it.  

????????????Lance won because he finished ahead of everyone. Coleman won because some commitee made up of old gay men said so.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: body88 on August 24, 2006, 09:07:58 PM
Big poppa J is your typical delusional riod monkey lol.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: dirk digler on August 24, 2006, 09:09:29 PM
Big poppa J is your typical delusional riod monkey lol.
But he's got "physical presence".
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: pobrecito on August 24, 2006, 09:11:37 PM
Physical presence? Spoken like a true bber. I'd rather be an athlete. Lance has power, speed and stength. Armstrong reached the top of Le Alpe du Huez in just over 40 minutes. That's nine miles basically straight up (7% grade). Estimates say he was pushin' over 800 watts. A typical cyclyst does about 400. Most recreational cyclists cannot even make it up without walking.

First off, Lance has gone up the Alpe well under 40 minutes, more like 37. Pantani (dead, EPO OD) holds the record.

Secondly, sustained 400 watts up a climb is elite class in cycling. Sprinters can make in excess of 1500 watts in a sprint.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: dirk digler on August 24, 2006, 09:15:58 PM
First off, Lance has gone up the Alpe well under 40 minutes, more like 37. Pantani (dead, EPO OD) holds the record.

Secondly, sustained 400 watts up a climb is elite class in cycling. Sprinters can make in excess of 1500 watts in a sprint.
You think? I'm a cat 2 racer and I can climb a cat 4 climb at 365w
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: pobrecito on August 24, 2006, 09:18:58 PM
You think? I'm a cat 2 racer and I can climb a cat 4 climb at 365w

D'Huez is hors catagorie....Armstrong and Pantani were likely making average of 450 watts. Landis was doing about 415 into Morzine doped up on testosterone.

Secondly, if you can average 365 watts for 9 miles up a hill, you are an exceptional endurance athlete.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: ManBearPig... on August 24, 2006, 09:28:16 PM
D'Huez is hors catagorie....Armstrong and Pantani were likely making average of 450 watts. Landis was doing about 415 into Morzine doped up on testosterone.

Secondly, if you can average 365 watts for 9 miles up a hill, you are an exceptional endurance athlete.

ronnie coleman can do 650.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: pobrecito on August 24, 2006, 09:34:16 PM
ronnie coleman can do 650.

Ronnie would have a heart attack trying to ride up L'alpe ;)

He needs an oxygen tank just to hit a few poses :-\
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: dirk digler on August 24, 2006, 09:42:12 PM
D'Huez is hors catagorie....Armstrong and Pantani were likely making average of 450 watts. Landis was doing about 415 into Morzine doped up on testosterone.

Secondly, if you can average 365 watts for 9 miles up a hill, you are an exceptional endurance athlete.
Why thank you, but I'm pushin' 40. But Duez isn't a cat 4 climb. As I said I'm a cat 2 rider. I've won some, but with family it's hard to devote the time and energy to try and be a cat1(pro). I went from being a 235 lb bber to a 175lb bike racer.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Anal Iceman Lubeth on August 24, 2006, 09:43:33 PM
Why thank you, but I'm pushin' 40. But Duez isn't a cat 4 climb. As I said I'm a cat 2 rider. I've won some, but with family it's hard to devote the time and energy to try and be a cat1(pro). I went from being a 235 lb bber to a 175lb bike racer.

eat the jello
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: tommywishbone on August 24, 2006, 09:45:44 PM
You think? I'm a cat 2 racer and I can climb a cat 4 climb at 365w

Hey Roadie.. what's up. Former USCF Cat. 2 road/Cat. 1 track rider here. How's your season going? What are you riding. My last Pro-Bike was an Eddy Merckx w/dura-ace 8-speed. ;D

Always in the big ring...

Tom
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: brianX on August 24, 2006, 09:59:01 PM

Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.

Andre are you suggesting that "sarcasm" spends every waking hour posting on Getbig because he's an unemployed, unmarried, 35 year old wannabe neo-nazi who relies on his mom for money and is bitter at the world because he could never develop any real size or strength even after years of steroid use? Furthermore, are you suggesting that sarcasm acts like an obnoxious attention whore on the Internet because he lacks the social skills to make friends with people in real life?

Let me know if this was indeed what you were suggesting.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bic_staedtler on August 25, 2006, 01:41:17 AM
First off, Lance has gone up the Alpe well under 40 minutes, more like 37. Pantani (dead, EPO OD) holds the record.

Secondly, sustained 400 watts up a climb is elite class in cycling. Sprinters can make in excess of 1500 watts in a sprint.

...Thirdly, I saw Connie Rollman do 3 plate walking lunges up that same Alps road.  It was really amazing.  Well, not really.  The amazing part, I mean.  Cause I really did see it.  The walking lunges part. Whew.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Bast175 on August 25, 2006, 01:44:33 AM
O don't understand this thread.   It's not like Lance was musclebound before. 'pics without drugs'   ::)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: w8tlftr on August 25, 2006, 04:45:03 AM
...well, nothing as sad as watching two metro's running around with their shirts off....what, it's too heavy?...wearing the shirts and all?  Come on if this wasn't a huge egotistical driven PHOTO ME PLEASE, WE'RE SINGLE then I don't know what is.

Yeah, money, pussy, whatever.  They can't nail as many ho's as us BECAUSE of their cash....what, you think these guys nail chicks left and right?  No more than most of us here with booty calls, these celebs are CONSTANTLY being hunted by professional goldiggers...go as KOBE!

And Lance is just a token drug user no different from our own CHAMP, Ronnie Coleman.  He overcame great odds, it's true.  But he's a cheat who wasn't caught.  Deal with it.  

Now go take your shirts off, and 'run' from the media...just like those two!

Except for you, Vince.

What PROOF does anyone have that Lance used drugs? It's my understanding that he's been tested more than any other athlete and he has never failed a single test - despite the best efforts of the French.

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bmacsys on August 25, 2006, 04:49:48 AM
lance was an average cyclist for the long tournaments like tour de france before his "cancer treatment". i mean of course you are a heck of a cyclist if you can just start there, but cīmon, he wasnīt even a threat to crack top 20 at the tour.
then all of a sudden he is way and ahead of the whole pack......
he was definetely eye to eye with ronnie on performance enhancing drugs.



After his cancer treatments Lance got serious, dropped a lot of weight and started to realize his potential.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bmacsys on August 25, 2006, 04:52:15 AM

the greatest genetic freak in cycling in the last decade or so is Ulrich, which is proven by performance tests, and he was/is a proven heavy drug user. so lance definetly NOT being genetically superior to Ulrich  and beating the shit out of him in france every year shows something......

Yes, that Lance is the way better cyclist. Lance is so much tougher mentally than Ulrich that it isn't even a contest. Thats what seperates Armstrong from Ulrich.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bmacsys on August 25, 2006, 04:59:13 AM
they look like they don't weigh 250lbs. together, hahahaha, what a couple of queers.

You got owned in this thread dude!
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: SteelePegasus on August 25, 2006, 05:47:10 AM
synthol

Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: TheGoldenPrince on August 25, 2006, 08:23:03 AM
Lance Armstrong and Matthew McConaughey

Monster traps.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: The Showstoppa on August 25, 2006, 08:26:43 AM
Lance is a skinny little bitch.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Wiggs on August 25, 2006, 09:00:34 AM
I'm trying to figure out which post is the most retarded of the two....this one or.........

You just took first place bottle nose.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 25, 2006, 09:05:16 AM
Big poppa J is your typical delusional riod monkey lol.

In a way I take that as a compliment. In an issue of MD they said that most serious steroid users have a very hyper-masculine view of what a man is supposed to be/look like.

As for Lance, I have respect for his accomplishments. I just can't understand why a man (and other men) would want to look like him and think they look good. Its not like their ripped, they've still got flab. I personally think their perspective, though valid, is far more warped than mine.

Money, hoes, cars and clothes - there's not enough of them in this world to convince me otherwise  ;)

(http://www.seti.ee/ff/marcus_ruhl_large.jpg)
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Gordon_Gekko on August 25, 2006, 08:43:11 PM
Money, hoes, cars and clothes - there's not enough of them in this world to convince me otherwise  ;)

(http://www.seti.ee/ff/marcus_ruhl_large.jpg)

Well, I've read that Ruhl is a computer programmer for a major German automaker (Audi, I think). So he's obviously got brains and money to go along with all the muscle. And as the photo you've posted proves, the Aryan Mountain of Muscle clearly has great fashion sense. As far as "hoes" go, one has to look no further than his wife - the lovely Simone - to see that the Big Man is also quite a hit with the ladies. Ruhl proves that you CAN have it all - money, hoes, cars, clothes, AND muscle.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 25, 2006, 09:19:30 PM
Well, I've read that Ruhl is a computer programmer for a major German automaker (Audi, I think). So he's obviously got brains and money to go along with all the muscle. And as the photo you've posted proves, the Aryan Mountain of Muscle clearly has great fashion sense. As far as "hoes" go, one has to look no further than his wife - the lovely Simone - to see that the Big Man is also quite a hit with the ladies. Ruhl proves that you CAN have it all - money, hoes, cars, clothes, AND muscle.

in his dvd he said he sold used cars . . .
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Alex23 on August 25, 2006, 10:51:25 PM

Sad?  Come on!  This guy tells complete strangers on an internet forum what he has for dinner.  Is that Sad?  This guy writes about teenage boys at his gym.  Is that sad?  This guy created several different names to back up his posts.  IS that sad?  What about the racial remarks?  Is that sad?  What about the transgender comments?  What about the admission to Bast taht he's 30 something, been on steroids for a long time, and still can't get a 6-pack?  What about spending 15 hours a day on getbig?  How is that Sad?  This guy seems totally cool to me.
I've been saying the same for years... right on.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: 240 is Back on August 25, 2006, 11:13:25 PM
Monster traps.

All Shrugs?

I love to rhyme.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: JKDMan on August 25, 2006, 11:55:06 PM
Quote
Andre are you suggesting that "sarcasm" spends every waking hour posting on Getbig because he's an unemployed, unmarried, 35 year old wannabe neo-nazi who relies on his mom for money and is bitter at the world because he could never develop any real size or strength even after years of steroid use? Furthermore, are you suggesting that sarcasm acts like an obnoxious attention whore on the Internet because he lacks the social skills to make friends with people in real life?

Let me know if this was indeed what you were suggesting.

;D
Epic owning of Sarcasm. Oh, brother. hahahaha
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: bic_staedtler on August 26, 2006, 03:00:38 AM
What PROOF does anyone have that Lance used drugs? It's my understanding that he's been tested more than any other athlete and he has never failed a single test - despite the best efforts of the French.



....if you need drug tests to issue 'proof' then you're a PERFECT fan for bodybuilding....and by the way, many pro's have tested negative under very stringent drug tests...but hey, if you really think Lance is some super human then have fun....and keep waiting up for the Great Pumpkin while you're at it!

Cycling couldn't nail down their golden goose....but why do you think all the sudden NOW the cheaters are being found out?  AFTER Lance?  I don't care how many tests he's beaten....he's a druggie like the top 12 (and the current bozo, Landis) of his sport.  How can you ignore this?

Think of the Ben Johnson case.  It's well known that EVERY sprinter in that race was on juice....and so was the victor, Ben!  You think that cycling is any different?..you're mistaken, friend.

But to each his own.  I think Lance is an amazing human being for beating cancer and winning 7 tours, but as far as being a sportsman, he's a drug using cheat, just like the rest of them. 
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: phreak on August 26, 2006, 05:42:02 AM
Armstrong beat TESTICULAR cancer. Does anyone know what the normal procedure is? Removing the cancerous tissue, i.e., neutering him. Neutering means NO ENDOGENOUS TEST. Consequently, he received a prescription for HRT for the rest of his life. So almost certainly he was monitored daily by his physician to see that his test/epi-test values were always close to the legal max. And assuming they are not tested minutes before a race, then a shot of test suspension would raise it even higher for a few hours, and no evidence to be found after the finish, when the levels were back down to a legal (but still very high) 6:1 ratio.


Almost makes me wish I had his "problem".
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Gordon_Gekko on August 26, 2006, 07:20:02 AM
in his dvd he said he sold used cars . . .

Thanks for the correction. I was going off the questionable info that was in a small biographical article on him many years ago in the ever-truthful MMI. I always suspected it was bullshit.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 26, 2006, 07:33:33 AM
Thanks for the correction. I was going off the questionable info that was in a small biographical article on him many years ago in the ever-truthful MMI. I always suspected it was bullshit.

LOL - monster journalistic integrity

no harm done though - we're cool
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Condor on August 26, 2006, 08:50:13 AM
Is this what a man's supposed to look like? I see these wankers everywhere with their i-pods strapped to their 10 inch arm checking their heart-rate monitors to see if they're in that "cardio zone". And it's not like they have fit looking physiques. They're bony and flabby! Every year they just get bonnier and flabbier. If you're doing all that cardio you'd think they'd be cut but no. No physical presence - nothing to show for their efforts.

I'd rather be able to squat a car and die before 60 then live to 100 being weak, defenceless, and completely lacking a physical presence.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=90615.0;attach=98067;image)

I have to defend McConaughey here, he's always had some decent lean muscle mass, check out any one of his movies.  He may not be "action star big," but for most actors, he's got a decent build.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: Mr Anabolic on August 26, 2006, 10:53:25 AM
Lance needs to come out of the closet.
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: The Showstoppa on August 26, 2006, 11:07:55 AM
One thing is for sure....I have more balls than Lance. hahahahahah
Title: Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
Post by: tleilaxutank on August 26, 2006, 11:10:03 AM
Armstrong beat TESTICULAR cancer. Does anyone know what the normal procedure is? Removing the cancerous tissue, i.e., neutering him. Neutering means NO ENDOGENOUS TEST. Consequently, he received a prescription for HRT for the rest of his life. So almost certainly he was monitored daily by his physician to see that his test/epi-test values were always close to the legal max. And assuming they are not tested minutes before a race, then a shot of test suspension would raise it even higher for a few hours, and no evidence to be found after the finish, when the levels were back down to a legal (but still very high) 6:1 ratio.


Almost makes me wish I had his "problem".

Pretty sure they only took one ball.  When you lose one the other does double duty and you don't see a drop testosterone levels...