Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: 240 is Back on September 17, 2006, 04:18:50 PM
-
This is just an article from a Canadian publication. I'm sure it's wrong, and all that. But in the non-mainstream media, it's been coming out over the last few days. Could be nothing, could just be a scare tactic. But it'd be irresponsible not to pass it on
Exclusive to Canada Free Press and Northeast Intelligence
Next Attack Imminent:
Muslims ordered to leave the United States
Adnan el shukrijuma
By Paul L. Williams & David Dastych
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Urgent news from Abu Dawood, the newly appointed commander of the al Qaeda forces in Afghanistan:
Final preparations have been made for the American Hiroshima, a major attack on the U. S.
Muslims living in the United States should leave the country without further warning.
The attack will be commandeered by Adnan el Shukrijumah ("Jaffer Tayyer" or "Jafer the Pilot"), a naturalized American citizen, who was raised in Brooklyn and educated in southern Florida.
The al Qaeda operatives who will launch this attack are awaiting final orders. They remain in place in cities throughout the country. Many are masquerading as Christians and have adopted Christian names.
Al Qaeda and the Taliban will also launch a major strike (known as the "Badar offensive" against the coalition forces in Afghanistan during the holy month of Ramadan.
The American people will be treated to a final audio message from Osama bin Laden which will be aired within the next two weeks.
-
This is just an article from a Canadian publication. I'm sure it's wrong, and all that. But in the non-mainstream media, it's been coming out over the last few days. Could be nothing, could just be a scare tactic. But it'd be irresponsible not to pass it on
Exclusive to Canada Free Press and Northeast Intelligence
Next Attack Imminent:
Muslims ordered to leave the United States
Adnan el shukrijuma
By Paul L. Williams & David Dastych
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Urgent news from Abu Dawood, the newly appointed commander of the al Qaeda forces in Afghanistan:
Final preparations have been made for the American Hiroshima, a major attack on the U. S.
Muslims living in the United States should leave the country without further warning.
The attack will be commandeered by Adnan el Shukrijumah ("Jaffer Tayyer" or "Jafer the Pilot"), a naturalized American citizen, who was raised in Brooklyn and educated in southern Florida.
The al Qaeda operatives who will launch this attack are awaiting final orders. They remain in place in cities throughout the country. Many are masquerading as Christians and have adopted Christian names.
Al Qaeda and the Taliban will also launch a major strike (known as the "Badar offensive" against the coalition forces in Afghanistan during the holy month of Ramadan.
The American people will be treated to a final audio message from Osama bin Laden which will be aired within the next two weeks.
This guy was on Michael Savage about a week ago and has been warning of this for some time. He scared the crap out of me and was very informed and detail oriented. He was telling of a friend of his who is a paki jounralist who is the only one to have interviewed OBL and was talking about his latest info from the taliban. This is some scary stuff.
-
Just to add a little levity... The CFP is an ultra right-wing, conservative, "alternative" paper, and the content is often racist, as well as inaccurate. They are constantly be sued, having to retract, etc... also, they often use journalism student interns to write their content.
-
Just to add a little levity... The CFP is an ultra right-wing, conservative, "alternative" paper, and the content is often racist, as well as inaccurate. They are constantly be sued, having to retract, etc... also, they often use journalism student interns to write their content.
Look up Paul Williams and "American Hiroshima". Also, look up what the Al Quadea leader in Afghanistan releseaed today.
-
Just to add a little levity... The CFP is an ultra right-wing, conservative, "alternative" paper, and the content is often racist, as well as inaccurate. They are constantly be sued, having to retract, etc... also, they often use journalism student interns to write their content.
dee dee a lot of things are just passed off as conspieracy theory but a lot of this stuff is happening a government loves its people ignorant!
-
dee dee a lot of things are just passed off as conspieracy theory but a lot of this stuff is happening a government loves its people ignorant!
I am not kidding. \Paul Williams was on Michal Savage explaining how the FBI was trying to find this Paki terrorist who is working with MS13 to smuggle components to make a nuke across the mexican border. The FBI has not idea where this guy is.
-
I am not kidding. \Paul Williams was on Michal Savage explaining how the FBI was trying to find this Paki terrorist who is working with MS13 to smuggle components to make a nuke across the mexican border. The FBI has not idea where this guy is.
i know you speak the truth i mean its kaos out there when it comes to nukes for a price a street gang could probably get nukes
-
dee dee a lot of things are just passed off as conspieracy theory but a lot of this stuff is happening a government loves its people ignorant!
Yes, but this is just right-wing fear mongering to terrify people back into supporting an unpopular war. The only blogs/new orgs who picked up that story are clearly ultra conservative.
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2006/09/14/paul-williams-continued-malarky/
-
Yes, but this is just right-wing fear mongering to terrify people back into supporting an unpopular war. The only blogs/new orgs who picked up that story are clearly ultra conservative.
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2006/09/14/paul-williams-continued-malarky/
do you think trying to stop terrorists getting nukes into south America an unpopular war i call it fighting for a countries life!
-
do you think trying to stop terrorists getting nukes into south America an unpopular war i call it fighting for a countries life!
No, I'm saying that right wing bloggers and news orgs are trying to garner new support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What's the best way to rouse a disillusioned people... raise the terrorist alert once again. Sometimes you just have to look through the propaganda sh*t and pick your CTs with discernment.
-
No, I'm saying that right wing bloggers and news orgs are trying to garner new support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What's the best way to rouse a disillusioned people... raise the terrorist alert once again. Sometimes you just have to look through the propaganda sh*t and pick your CTs with discernment.
So your basically saying it's another conspiracy theorie??
-
do you think trying to stop terrorists getting nukes into south America an unpopular war i call it fighting for a countries life!
I believe the reference was to teh current war in Iraq, or the next war in Iran.
This Nov, we'll get a new congress, most likely democrat. In Feb they'll start to pull us out of the war. And, getting into iran will become a non-issue, which will piss of the people from ISR that control much of what our govt does.
However, a nuclear attack would reverse this. The country would be scared and vote for tough talking republicans, the war in iraq would go on indefinitely, and people would cheer for bombing Iran.
Who would benefit from a nuke attack in the US...
Iranians? No way. They're all dead and improsoned in less than a year.
Iraqis? Uh, no. We'll be in their country another 10 years with a new atttack.
Taliban? No way - we'd double troop presence in Afghan.
Al Quida? Jeez, people. Osama died in 2001 and the CIA funds Al Q. It's public record. Grow up and read a fucking book if you still don't see this.
of course, this is the spot where people say I'm not patriotic. But I will say it, because I have the guuts to be a patriot among sheep. The pro-war republicans in power right now are the only ones who would benefit from an attack. Hell, they're the only ones gaining from the fear that this rumor causes.
-
Did you just say that OBL died in 2001???????????????????????? Dammit dude, you've lost it :'(!
-
The Bush administration who supposedly is all for keeping us safe from terrorism is leaving our southern border and ports wide open. But yeah, were safer now. ::)
-
So your basically saying it's another conspiracy theorie??
Yep... purty much. Just look at the sources. Of those who have reported this, all but one are discredited news orgs. I use the term "news" loosely.
-
The Bush administration who supposedly is all for keeping us safe from terrorism is leaving our southern border and ports wide open. But yeah, were safer now. ::)
But yeah...we haven't been hit since 9/11.............hope this helps!
-
Yep... purty much. Just look at the sources. Of those who have reported this, all but one are discredited news orgs. I use the term "news" loosely.
If I look at your Liberal sources, then of course it going to be a conspiracy, they think everything is a conspiracy. Damn, you people are insecure!
-
Did you just say that OBL died in 2001???????????????????????? Dammit dude, you've lost it :'(!
yes. osama is dead. And I have not 'lost it', I have researched it and followed world events for the last five years. here goes-
winter 01 - OBL left Tora bora ala the northern road. He took a 1000-car convoy, and we allowed them to leave. We had the path guarded on 3 sides but not on the 4th, and they simply left. They got on planes and left. This is all public record - a lot of people went on hardball and OReilly that month to criticize bin laden. It was all over the news in Dec 01. When you hear 'we let him escape", it wasn't poor battlefield skills - it was leaving on road unbombed and unguarded.
Anyway, most of his crew went to the border with pakistan, where they are protected by the ISI, the paki version of teh CIA. This explains why we've only picked up 4 or 5 Al Q guys who mattered in the last 5 years. They're assets.
bin laden was in late stage kidney failure in 2001. He flew to egypt and died of natural causes. he was buried, they had a service, and it was reported in arab papers.
ok, end fact - now, what I *believe* happened next:
No bin laden and the war woudl have to end. And, forget about Iraq. So we propagated the rumor he was still alive. The one fatfaced tape was the confession, the next on election eve 2004 to win the election for Bush. They were fake. I don't think even you, Mr I, can look at these 2 men and say they're the same guy. (and, remember how bad he looked in that last tape of his? Very bad shape, crippled left side). The 2 OBL videotapes were fake, as were the audiotapes that have come out since.
As long as OBL is "out there" we can have wars. period. You can accuse me of being unpatriotic for accusing our govt of lying to us about it, but earlier even you admitted that it's sometimes okay for govts to lie, as long as they're doing it in the best interest of the people. You believe they'll use smaller lies, I believe they'll lie a little bigger.
here's to peace I pray is coming!
(http://240fm.com/gb/cheers.gif)
-
But yeah...we haven't been hit since 9/11.............hope this helps!
Military grade anthrax mailed to democrats and media heads, killing 5 and terrorizing millions - that wasn't terrorism?
-
But yeah...we haven't been hit since 9/11.............hope this helps!
They attacked in 93 and not again untill 2001, 8 years.................ho pe this helps!
-
They attacked in 93 and not again untill 2001, 8 years.................ho pe this helps!
Your 18, we were bombed multiple times in the 8 years Clinton was in office.................. .HOPE THIS HELPS!!
-
If I look at your Liberal sources, then of course it going to be a conspiracy, they think everything is a conspiracy. Damn, you people are insecure!
LOL.. look at it this way... it takes a lot of courage to stand up and say you don't "go with the floor", whether it be in the workplace, or in the political arena. People who are insecure are more likely to just do what they're told. It takes a certain amount of courage to stand up to what you believe is wrong.
-
If I look at your Liberal sources, then of course it going to be a conspiracy, they think everything is a conspiracy. Damn, you people are insecure!
No, not insecure. I just have a degree in Journalism from a reputable school. There I was taught to read and analyse the news properly, and as well, I learned the "tricks." So today I read many blogs, etc., and formulate my own opinions. It has nothing to do with my politics.
-
Your 18, we were bombed multiple times in the 8 years Clinton was in office.................. .HOPE THIS HELPS!!
LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office, what other time were we bombed on our soil?
-
yes. osama is dead. And I have not 'lost it', I have researched it and followed world events for the last five years. here goes-
winter 01 - OBL left Tora bora ala the northern road. He took a 1000-car convoy, and we allowed them to leave. We had the path guarded on 3 sides but not on the 4th, and they simply left. They got on planes and left. This is all public record - a lot of people went on hardball and OReilly that month to criticize bin laden. It was all over the news in Dec 01. When you hear 'we let him escape", it wasn't poor battlefield skills - it was leaving on road unbombed and unguarded.
Anyway, most of his crew went to the border with pakistan, where they are protected by the ISI, the paki version of teh CIA. This explains why we've only picked up 4 or 5 Al Q guys who mattered in the last 5 years. They're assets.
bin laden was in late stage kidney failure in 2001. He flew to egypt and died of natural causes. he was buried, they had a service, and it was reported in arab papers.
ok, end fact - now, what I *believe* happened next:
No bin laden and the war woudl have to end. And, forget about Iraq. So we propagated the rumor he was still alive. The one fatfaced tape was the confession, the next on election eve 2004 to win the election for Bush. They were fake. I don't think even you, Mr I, can look at these 2 men and say they're the same guy. (and, remember how bad he looked in that last tape of his? Very bad shape, crippled left side). The 2 OBL videotapes were fake, as were the audiotapes that have come out since.
As long as OBL is "out there" we can have wars. period. You can accuse me of being unpatriotic for accusing our govt of lying to us about it, but earlier even you admitted that it's sometimes okay for govts to lie, as long as they're doing it in the best interest of the people. You believe they'll use smaller lies, I believe they'll lie a little bigger.
here's to peace I pray is coming!
(http://240fm.com/gb/cheers.gif)
(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/headbanging.jpg)
-
Clinton was quite the little snake. bush had warning from 11 nations and let 911 happen. Sure. Inexcusable.
Clinton's FBI gave the terrorists the bombs for the 93 WTC attacks.... Clinton's prosecutor's didn't mention those 3 huge bombs removed from the OK City federal building.
So both men employed false flag attacks. And listen, anyone who wants to shit on my "crazy talk", look at the evidence. TELL ME why they left those 3 bombs out of the trial at OK City. TELL ME why the FBI head was on tape giving directions about the 1993 WTC attack.
I'm tired of getting labeled, when people won't face the evidence in front of them. I can show you the FEMA and ATF documents of the bombs removed by the bomb squad from OK City. yes they dissappeared at trial. I'd love for one of our patriots here to tell me how this works :)
-
LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office, what other time were we bombed on our soil?
Please, we were bombed on our own soil a second time while Clinton was in office? This is news to me.
These attacks don't happen everyday. Were not safer now, just more paranoid.
P.S. Im not defending Clinton at all, just that 8 years past between attacks.
-
(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/headbanging.jpg)
LOL...
What part frustrates you?
Tell me this - and I've asked you before - do you believe this is the same Osama?
-
No, not insecure. I just have a degree in Journalism from a reputable school. There I was taught to read and analyse the news properly, and as well, I learned the "tricks." So today I read many blogs, etc., and formulate my own opinions. It has nothing to do with my politics.
What's your opinion on Sawatsky?
YIP
Zack
-
LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office, what other time were we bombed on our soil?
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york-issue112901.shtml
WTC, USS Cole and the US Embassies are considered our soil!
-
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york-issue112901.shtml
WTC, USS Cole and the US Embassies are considered our soil!
Attacks that didn't happen in the United States but on our soil in other countries around the world are happening under Bush as we speak, so whats your point?
Come on Intenseone, ENTER THE NO SPIN ZONE! 8)
-
Yes, but this is just right-wing fear mongering to terrify people back into supporting an unpopular war. The only blogs/new orgs who picked up that story are clearly ultra conservative.
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2006/09/14/paul-williams-continued-malarky/
I believe there is fear mongering going on, but this image is depicted in the mural's at DIA which are a sort of timeline depiction of the zionist end times and masonic game plan for humanity. So I believe there is a good chance this will happen. I thought it would be later for this but ???
-
mural's at DIA
Whats DIA?
-
Just to add a little levity... The CFP is an ultra right-wing, conservative, "alternative" paper, and the content is often racist, as well as inaccurate. They are constantly be sued, having to retract, etc... also, they often use journalism student interns to write their content.
hahaha . . . 240 can't stay away from websites run by guys w tattoos of swastikas on their necks.
-
hahaha . . . 240 can't stay away from websites run by guys w tattoos of swastikas on their necks.
what a racist, bullshit charge to levy. grow up algebra. the story is making the rounds, and i put the disclaimer up top. grow the fuck up, and deliver an argument.
-
what a racist, bullshit charge to levy. grow up algebra. the story is making the rounds, and i put the disclaimer up top. grow the f**k up, and deliver an argument.
This is what your disclaimer looked like:
This is just an article from a Canadian publication. I'm sure it's wrong, and all that. But in the non-mainstream media, it's been coming out over the last few days. Could be nothing, could just be a scare tactic. But it'd be irresponsible not to pass it on
I think it was irresponsible to not mention that the source of the information was heavily biased.
YIP
Zack
-
No, I'm saying that right wing bloggers and news orgs are trying to garner new support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What's the best way to rouse a disillusioned people... raise the terrorist alert once again. Sometimes you just have to look through the propaganda sh*t and pick your CTs with discernment.
You are so uninformed. The terrorists plot and plot for years for big attacks.
-
Yep... purty much. Just look at the sources. Of those who have reported this, all but one are discredited news orgs. I use the term "news" loosely.
And Democratic Underground and the NYT are bastions of credibility. Right.
-
No, not insecure. I just have a degree in Journalism from a reputable school. There I was taught to read and analyse the news properly, and as well, I learned the "tricks." So today I read many blogs, etc., and formulate my own opinions. It has nothing to do with my politics.
And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves. You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.
-
LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office, what other time were we bombed on our soil?
1993 WTC
Foreign Embassies in Africa
Marine Barracks
USS Cole
Read the 9'11 report. OBL said since we acted like little pussies all through the 90's that he thought we would never fight back.
-
And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves. You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.
Depends on what you mean by liberal.
Liberal as the political ideology of Republicans, Democrats or Libertarians - sure.
All Journalism profs are probably a supporter of one of the above, and all of those parties bases its politics on liberalism in some form.
For whatever reason, the word "liberal" has been used to label people to the left on the political scale.
Which is, of course, incorrect.
YIP
Zack
-
Depends on what you mean by liberal.
Liberal as the political ideology of Republicans, Democrats or Libertarians - sure.
All Journalism profs are probably a supporter of one of the above, and all of those parties bases its politics on liberalism in some form.
For whatever reason, the word "liberal" has been used to label people to the left on the political scale.
Which is, of course, incorrect.
YIP
Zack
I prefer socialist and communist as a label for them myself.
-
1993 WTC
Foreign Embassies in Africa
Marine Barracks
USS Cole
Read the 9'11 report. OBL said since we acted like little pussies all through the 90's that he thought we would never fight back.
You missed my whole point. Intenseone said there hasn't been an attack since 9/11, I said there were 8 years between the last attack on our homeland, he said there were attacks on our soil over seas under Clinton (which had nothing to do with my argument about there not being an attack over here for 8 years.), were being attacked on our own soil abroad all the time under Bush.
So what makes you people think were safer?
-
You missed my whole point. Intenseone said there hasn't been an attack since 9/11, I said there were 8 years between the last attack on our homeland, he said there were attacks on our soil over seas under Clinton (which had nothing to do with my argument about there not being an attack over here for 8 years.), were being attacked on our own soil abroad all the time under Bush.
So what makes you people think were safer?
Fool, we have been being attacked since Carter (Hostages), Reagan (Beirut), Bush (Lockerbie Scotland), Clinton,
It goes on and on. We are facing a determined fanatical cult following enemy.
-
And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves. You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.
Sorry guy, but I don't get what this means. Are you saying I'm accusing others of being liberals?
As far as your other responses to my posts go, I just don't see how you can tell whether I'm a conservative or liberal leaning. I also find it condescending, since you don't know me, to say that I'm uninformed. What I said was that the sources reporting on this are heavily editorialized and biased toward the right. Paul Williams has been going on about the imminent attack for two years now, so I doubt if he and the rest of the world understand the same meaning for the word imminent. I do understand that terrorist cells have the patience of the east and plan their attacks many years in advance. I just don't believe 6 hack right wing news sources, one of which employs students, would have the inside breaking news on this.
-
Fool, we have been being attacked since Carter (Hostages), Reagan (Beirut), Bush (Lockerbie Scotland), Clinton,
It goes on and on. We are facing a determined fanatical cult following enemy.
<unt try and stick with me here OK? Were being attacked more now than ever... OK? So whats your proof were safer under Bush.... U n d e r s t a n d ?
-
Whats DIA?
Dever International Airport... it's full of really strange occult stuff much of it in line with the vision of the coming of the old testement messiah and what is to be the messonic messiah. He's Scottish from the famous McGregor Clan or at least he bears the same family motto. ;D
Burning City... I think this will happen, just don't know when...
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=14927_SmCity.jpg)
-
WOW What the FOCK?
(http://peterdarbyshire.com/archives/shrapnel%20images/denver.jpg)
-
WOW What the FOCK?
(http://peterdarbyshire.com/archives/shrapnel%20images/denver.jpg)
Did you see the dead babies ;D
-
JUST DID.. NOW I AM THOROUGHLY FREAKED OUT. :'(
Can you post a hot ass picture to turn my frown around?
-
Check it out, here is after the destruction, the image that is in the old testament on the messiah, the swords to plowshares. It is also in line with the messonic messiah/new order of the ages/from many one... This is it baby, the master plan... They put this stuff everywhere for people to see. The blond boy is the one in common from other murals and who wears the Mcgregor motto.
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=14928_murals10.jpg)
And no, I don't have a fascist attack in line for anyone who doesn't agree with me like Ozmo says ::)
-
Sorry guy, but I don't get what this means. Are you saying I'm accusing others of being liberals?
As far as your other responses to my posts go, I just don't see how you can tell whether I'm a conservative or liberal leaning. I also find it condescending, since you don't know me, to say that I'm uninformed. What I said was that the sources reporting on this are heavily editorialized and biased toward the right. Paul Williams has been going on about the imminent attack for two years now, so I doubt if he and the rest of the world understand the same meaning for the word imminent. I do understand that terrorist cells have the patience of the east and plan their attacks many years in advance. I just don't believe 6 hack right wing news sources, one of which employs students, would have the inside breaking news on this.
So who in your opinion in a "hack left wing news source"????????????????????????
-
So who in your opinion in a "hack left wing news source"????????????????????????
The one that instantly comes to mind at the moment is the Montreal Gazette. I really try to stay away from reading both conservative as well as liberal hack news blogs/orgs and prefer to get my news from a variety of sources like the BBC, a few French and German papers as well as Boston Globe and LA Times. For Canadian news it's the Globe and Mail. The only "liberal" on-line news sources I read are Truthout and Media Matters for America. Mostly what goes on in the world is very troubling and sickening to me, so I sometimes try to avoid as much of the depressing news as possible and I often go long periods of time where I only read Artsjournal.com and London Review of Books.
Does that answer the question? :)
-
This is what your disclaimer looked like:
This is just an article from a Canadian publication. I'm sure it's wrong, and all that. But in the non-mainstream media, it's been coming out over the last few days. Could be nothing, could just be a scare tactic. But it'd be irresponsible not to pass it on
I think it was irresponsible to not mention that the source of the information was heavily biased.
yeah, but the moment I label any publication as highly left or highly right, suddenly that is what the argument becomes. People will automatically accept or dismiss the articles based upon whatever 3 word description they hear accompanying it.
I posted the WTC1993 voice recordings of the bomber speaking with FBI head about the bomb construction - yet people dismiss it because it is on a site they deem liberal. I could show them someone from our country standing on one of those little TNT boxes you'd see in cartoons with the plunger detonator, and if it came from anywhere left of FOX, they wouldn't even look at it.
Do you agree that many here will ignore or dismiss evidence or articles not based upon their content, but upon the newspaper/site in which they arrive?
-
yeah, but the moment I label any publication as highly left or highly right, suddenly that is what the argument becomes. People will automatically accept or dismiss the articles based upon whatever 3 word description they hear accompanying it.
I posted the WTC1993 voice recordings of the bomber speaking with FBI head about the bomb construction - yet people dismiss it because it is on a site they deem liberal. I could show them someone from our country standing on one of those little TNT boxes you'd see in cartoons with the plunger detonator, and if it came from anywhere left of FOX, they wouldn't even look at it.
Do you agree that many here will ignore or dismiss evidence or articles not based upon their content, but upon the newspaper/site in which they arrive?
Good point, very good point.
But then, IMO, you really should be a bit more selective when posting articles.
It's not a biggie...
I dunno, I guess I just felt that it would lend to the credibility if the source is shady, then mention it.
Fictious example: If I post an article about how all black people are really low intelligent, it would be fair play to mention that the site that I got the article from, aryansaretehshyte.com, are known for their connections with the KKK or whatever.
At least when posting from unfamiliar extreme sources IMO. No need to post a disclaimer for shit like Limbaugh, Franken, FOX or the mainstream media.
JMO.
I just reacted because I got the impression that the source was a 'regular' alternative news source. Smaller news station.
As I stated, no big deal.
YIP
Zack
-
What's your opinion on Sawatsky?
YIP
Zack
I respect what he's contributed to journalism in Canada, and his sense of ethics. Now he's also like the direct mail guru of "interviewing" who basically wrote the formula for the way it's done today. You have to admire that too. Someone who met him said that while he didn't really seem to volunteer much in the way of presence, he does have incisive eyes and seems to intuitively know how to read people. Doesn't he now work for some US news network, teaching anchor people how to conduct interviews?
-
many people here would consider Alex Jones to be an extreme, left wing source. They'd dismiss prisonplanet.com or Infowars.com as conspiracy crap.
Problem is, on July 25, 2001, Alex jones predicted 9/11.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1222445722544874066&q=alex+jones+july+25%2C+2001&hl=en
Alex Jones said:
- Here are the news stories which precipatate terror attacks
- We know the Joint Chiefs want to blow up airliners
- We know you will use these attacks to restrict American rights
- Bin Laden, a known CIA asset, will be blamed.
- "If you LET some terrorist group do it, like the WTC"
He put up the White House's phone number. He begged his listeners to call the Wh and their congressmen, and ask them to investigate the recent media reports which show the govt is prepping for a self-attack.
Some 16 days later, we were attacked on 9/11.
Some believe that if 100 miillion people had heard this message, instead of 10,000 - then 911 wouldn't have happened.
-
many people here would consider Alex Jones to be an extreme, left wing source.
And nothing could be futher from that truth... If anything he's much more conservative than liberal. Pro-gun, Patriot, Pro-American Sovereignty, Pro Freedom... Doesn't strike me as the type who likes big government. Alex seems much more like the type who follows the best government is the one that governs the least type. If he gets pegged as a left wing source he's wrongly pegged bigtime. He's a guy who truly sees the divide and rule and the purpose of communism, this ism and that ism behind divide and rule. I love Alex man ;D
-
many people here would consider Alex Jones to be an extreme, left wing source. They'd dismiss prisonplanet.com or Infowars.com as conspiracy crap.
Problem is, on July 25, 2001, Alex jones predicted 9/11.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1222445722544874066&q=alex+jones+july+25%2C+2001&hl=en
Alex Jones said:
- Here are the news stories which precipatate terror attacks
- We know the Joint Chiefs want to blow up airliners
- We know you will use these attacks to restrict American rights
- Bin Laden, a known CIA asset, will be blamed.
- "If you LET some terrorist group do it, like the WTC"
He put up the White House's phone number. He begged his listeners to call the Wh and their congressmen, and ask them to investigate the recent media reports which show the govt is prepping for a self-attack.
Some 16 days later, we were attacked on 9/11.
Some believe that if 100 miillion people had heard this message, instead of 10,000 - then 911 wouldn't have happened.
I've always though Alex Jones was a right-wing Republican. :-\
-
And nothing could be futher from that truth... If anything he's much more conservative than liberal. Pro-gun, Patriot, Pro-American Sovereignty, Pro Freedom... Doesn't strike me as the type who likes big government. Alex seems much more like the type who follows the best government is the one that governs the least type. If he gets pegged as a left wing source he's wrongly pegged bigtime. He's a guy who truly sees the divide and rule and the purpose of communism, this ism and that ism behind divide and rule. I love Alex man ;D
Ya, Alex Jones is a TOTAL republican! Why some people can't seem to understand that Republicans are capable of hating what's going on in their country under this current regime is beyond me. It was the alienation of the mainstream Republicans that even allowed Clinton to get elected in the first place, then re-elected.
-
Ya, Alex Jones is a TOTAL republican! Why some people can't seem to understand that Republicans are capable of hating what's going on in their country under this current regime is beyond me. It was the alienation of the mainstream Republicans that even allowed Clinton to get elected in the first place, then re-elected.
I am a republican and disgusted what is going on in this country. HOWEVER, my disgust with the left is far greater than with GWB, who himself deserves a ton of criticism.
1. Spending (A Bridge to nowhere)
2. Illegal Immigration (Sellout of American Workers)
3. Campaign Finance Reform (Abridges Free Speech)
4. Dubai Ports Deal ($$$$$$$$$$$$)
5. Prescription Drug Bill (More Socialism)
6. Farm Bill (Pork Pork Pork)
I have no problem with the WOT and in fact think he has not gone far enough against our enemies after 9/11.
-
I am a republican and disgusted what is going on in this country. HOWEVER, my disgust with the left is far greater than with GWB, who himself deserves a ton of criticism.
1. Spending (A Bridge to nowhere)
2. Illegal Immigration (Sellout of American Workers)
3. Campaign Finance Reform (Abridges Free Speech)
4. Dubai Ports Deal ($$$$$$$$$$$$)
5. Prescription Drug Bill (More Socialism)
6. Farm Bill (Pork Pork Pork)
I have no problem with the WOT and in fact think he has not gone far enough against our enemies after 9/11.
Fair enough.
Now if evidence came to the world stage which conclusively showed Bush let 9/11 happen, would he move up your list of dislike?
-
Fair enough.
Now if evidence came to the world stage which conclusively showed Bush let 9/11 happen, would he move up your list of dislike?
I have not seen any credible evidence so far, even from you.
-
I have not seen any credible evidence so far, even from you.
Conveniently avoiding the question i see... ::)
-
I am a republican and disgusted what is going on in this country. HOWEVER, my disgust with the left is far greater than with GWB, who himself deserves a ton of criticism.
1. Spending (A Bridge to nowhere)
2. Illegal Immigration (Sellout of American Workers)
3. Campaign Finance Reform (Abridges Free Speech)
4. Dubai Ports Deal ($$$$$$$$$$$$)
5. Prescription Drug Bill (More Socialism)
6. Farm Bill (Pork Pork Pork)
I have no problem with the WOT and in fact think he has not gone far enough against our enemies after 9/11.
In a capitalistic society, you don't protect the borders at all.
The theory is, that by protecting your (American) workers and industry, you allow them to survive without development. Which is largely why the US car industry isn't able to compete with the foreign companies. They never had to compete on equal terms.
This will lead to disaster in the end.
Perhaps this explains why Bush isn't protecting the US workers. He, or rather his business advisors (I doubt he has the intelligence), is looking out for the US economy as a whole.
Will it lead to prosperity? Sure.
USA just needs to get as many people as possible into college. Why not make college tuition for select courses free? I'm thinking engineering, math, physics, computer science and shit.
Stuff that USA will only profit from.
YIP
Zack