Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bigger Business on September 27, 2006, 07:27:14 AM

Title: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Bigger Business on September 27, 2006, 07:27:14 AM
With all the research going into muscletech products eg. gakic (8 years), luekic (millions of $US) and of course anator p70 are the athletes that are stuck with companies like twinlab, bsn, pinnacle etc. severely sufferring on the pro stage? 
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Adam Empire on September 27, 2006, 07:36:04 AM
Oh yes, without such innovations how can the other guys compete.  I have seen pics of Muscletech labs in their ads - they look legit.
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: chris_mason on September 27, 2006, 07:52:41 AM
LOL!

 ;D
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: wood on September 27, 2006, 08:01:00 AM
too funny, yeah, big ron coleman is clearly disadvantaged b/c he represents someone other than Muscletech ::)

Dude, seriously, it's all about who has the advertising dollars and who's willing to spend it.  The R & D and having more big name athletes in your stable helps as well.
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: The True Adonis on September 27, 2006, 08:03:15 AM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6b/Mad_scientist_caricature.png/300px-Mad_scientist_caricature.png)

"Argggggg! With my new formulations I shall trick the teen-agers on bodybuilding.com and take over the Universe!"[/color]
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: rocket on September 27, 2006, 08:10:03 AM
You can almost feel the synergistic superstack power that a muscletech powered trainee exhibits.

You guys who are romanticising about Lee Priest and his truth telling would do well to remember that he split with muscletech because they were full of shit.
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Adam Empire on September 27, 2006, 08:19:40 AM
You can almost feel the synergistic superstack power that a muscletech powered trainee exhibits.

You guys who are romanticising about Lee Priest and his truth telling would do well to remember that he split with muscletech because they were full of shit.

What?  These guys have the labs!  Have you seen the ads - they even have protein shakers in the cabinets - so they can taste the latest Low Impact, Dual Absorption, Hyper Delivery, Sugar Punch at any moment.  I think most scientific labs suggest that you eat and drink right there - on the spot.  No need to worry about chemicals or anything.  Muscletech labs are so spotless in the ads that they don't even have anything on the counters.  Who wants testing equipment getting in the way of a good photoshoot anyway.  And the stethoscope around the "scientist's" is completely necessary.  Their protein is 5647% quieter than the competitors - you need a stethoscope to even know it's there.



 :D
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Playboy on September 27, 2006, 08:28:56 AM
too funny, yeah, big ron coleman is clearly disadvantaged b/c he represents someone other than Muscletech ::)

Dude, seriously, it's all about who has the advertising dollars and who's willing to spend it.  The R & D and having more big name athletes in your stable helps as well.
Agreed 100%.
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Adam Empire on September 27, 2006, 08:33:26 AM
Agreed 100%.

I think some people are missing the sarcasm (at least I hope the first post was sarcasm).
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: The True Adonis on September 27, 2006, 08:34:29 AM
What?  These guys have the labs!  Have you seen the ads - they even have protein shakers in the cabinets - so they can taste the latest Low Impact, Dual Absorption, Hyper Delivery, Sugar Punch at any moment.  I think most scientific labs suggest that you eat and drink right there - on the spot.  No need to worry about chemicals or anything.  Muscletech labs are so spotless in the ads that they don't even have anything on the counters.  Who wants testing equipment getting in the way of a good photoshoot anyway.  And the stethoscope around the "scientist's" is completely necessary.  Their protein is 5647% quieter than the competitors - you need a stethoscope to even know it's there.



 :D

ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OO
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Figo on September 27, 2006, 08:43:04 AM
What?  These guys have the labs!  Have you seen the ads - they even have protein shakers in the cabinets - so they can taste the latest Low Impact, Dual Absorption, Hyper Delivery, Sugar Punch at any moment.  I think most scientific labs suggest that you eat and drink right there - on the spot.  No need to worry about chemicals or anything.  Muscletech labs are so spotless in the ads that they don't even have anything on the counters.  Who wants testing equipment getting in the way of a good photoshoot anyway.  And the stethoscope around the "scientist's" is completely necessary.  Their protein is 5647% quieter than the competitors - you need a stethoscope to even know it's there.
:D

I fully agree, not many people knew that. Everyone always wondered about the stethoscope, but didnt know why or what it was there for.
Now the secret is out! Stealth Protein!

And Priest didnt split with them because of the product, in fact, I heard he decants the Twinlab containers, and fills them with Muscletech powder/tabs...

There we go, now everybody knows.
















Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: fathead on September 27, 2006, 10:55:49 AM
Ronnie is with BSN.  end of story
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Jr. Yates on September 27, 2006, 10:57:54 AM
Ronnie is with BSN.  end of story
exactly! BSN was a pretty quiet company, then they signed ronnie and their labels turned hologram! holy shit!
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: Bigger Business on September 27, 2006, 05:31:52 PM
Ive heard muscletech has 10.5% hotter bunsen burners
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: tommywishbone on September 27, 2006, 05:34:34 PM
What?  These guys have the labs!  Have you seen the ads - they even have protein shakers in the cabinets - so they can taste the latest Low Impact, Dual Absorption, Hyper Delivery, Sugar Punch at any moment.  I think most scientific labs suggest that you eat and drink right there - on the spot.  No need to worry about chemicals or anything.  Muscletech labs are so spotless in the ads that they don't even have anything on the counters.  Who wants testing equipment getting in the way of a good photoshoot anyway.  And the stethoscope around the "scientist's" is completely necessary.  Their protein is 5647% quieter than the competitors - you need a stethoscope to even know it's there.
 :D

 ;D ;D
Title: Re: Are non-muscletech athletes disadvantaged?
Post by: tommywishbone on September 27, 2006, 05:37:14 PM
Ive heard muscletech has 10.5% hotter bunsen burners

And their petrie dishes have 137% more petrie.