.

This exchange started with me responding to this:

I hope now you understand:

Trump did not mock a disabled reporter.  I gave you the link.

There was no "insurrection," and I've explained why.

Trump did not call white supremacists and neo-nazis "very fine people."  I gave you the actual transcript of what he said. 

Those are all falsehoods that you and the left have been repeating for years.  And like I said, I was initially fooled by the disabled reporter lie, which is a large part of the reason I refused to vote for him in 2016 and voted for the space cadet Gary Johnson.  But I was wrong.

I understand that what most people consider mocking someone, apparently some (like you) do not. In the videos I've seen and previously posted here, it looked like mocking to me.

I understand that although the events of January 6, 2021, have been widely described as an insurrection and an act of domestic terrorism by politicians, historians, and in congressional reports, that to secure a conviction for insurrection, prosecutors needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that participants had the specific intent to overthrow the government or prevent the execution of federal laws entirely, rather than just disrupt a single, temporary proceeding.

I understand that in this video (which I have previously posted) at 1:03, Trump said "There are very fine people on both sides." I never claimed to know what or who he meant when he said this.

          Connspiracy theory, but might be the greatest scam ever created as there is no victim. The system weeds out people who will be devastated by losses. The little guy who buys $10,000  of Bitcoin then it drops 30% in a week.

     The whales are manipulating the price. So anyone who cant afford to lose ALL their investment in Bitcoin gets scared and gets out. Then the whales drive up the price. And when the peasants see 2500% Bitcoin gains they'll go all in, mortgage homes, use retirement money then the whales will sell.

     

That's called consolidation and happens in the stock market all the time.

Hey Methyl m1ke, take a look at this

https://x.com/JJCarrell14/status/2021385509520670823

Nothing interesting but thanks

The Biden DOJ sat on these files for four years while Biden was in office. If Donald Trump were directly implicated in sex trafficking—on the level of Jeffrey Epstein—why did Merrick Garland take no action?

If the evidence were real and prosecutable, Democrats could have pursued Trump aggressively and permanently ended any chance of him running again.

It’s also worth noting the timeline:
Epstein was arrested in 2019, while Trump was president.
Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested in 2020, also during Trump’s presidency.

Yes, Trump appears frequently in the files—but he was a celebrity who moved in elite circles and hosted large social events at his properties. Epstein and Maxwell were regulars in those circles. That alone does not establish criminal guilt. Epstein was connected to an enormous range of people—business leaders, politicians, royals, and celebrities. The sheer size of his contact list makes “guilt by association” a weak and lazy argument.

At the end of the day, emails prove little beyond hearsay. No one is going to be prosecuted without a clear paper trail—financial records, deals, payments—or credible witnesses tying Trump to trafficking or criminal activity. There are no corroborating witnesses backing up Epstein’s emails.

Maxwell may know more than she has disclosed, but her testimony alone would not be sufficient to prosecute anyone unless it were backed by concrete, independently verifiable evidence.

Without actual tangible proof or bodies waiting to be dug up. There is simply no case.

It's not what you know it's what you can prove.