FOR THE CHRISTIANS,.

[OTHstrong]

I am speaking of for example the Stephen Hawkings of the world. Most people have better bb genetics than he does or any other scrawny scientist. Are most people more intelligent? Clearly not.

Dad example Hawkings is dumb

[Deicide]

Dad example Hawkings is dumb

Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.

[OTHstrong]

Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.

I was being sarcastic

[OTHstrong]

Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.

[OTHstrong]

Does it not occure to you that someone that comes across like Hawking appears intelligent because he has devoted his entire life to study and has a passion in the field that he is in. A pro bodybuilder has a full time job as a bodybuilder; why would he appear smart, he has nothing left to exercise his brain at the end of the day. On the flip side Hawkings could've spent his whole life lifting weights and eating properly and he would have musles, but he wouldn't have as much academic achievements. your theory doesn't hold weight and comes across as rather dumb (for someone that so arrogantly is a self proclaimed intellect). Tell me then if bodybuilders are so dumb why are there 2 mr.Olympias out of eleven with phds

[tonymctones]

Does it not occure to you that someone that comes across like Hawking appears intelligent because he has devoted his entire life to study and has a passion in the field that he is in. A pro bodybuilder has a full time job as a bodybuilder; why would he appear smart, he has nothing left to exercise his brain at the end of the day. On the flip side Hawkings could've spent his whole life lifting weights and eating properly and he would have musles, but he wouldn't have as much academic achievements. your theory doesn't hold weight and comes across as rather dumb (for someone that so arrogantly is a self proclaimed intellect). Tell me then if bodybuilders are so dumb why are there 2 mr.Olympias out of eleven with phds

exactly not hawkings but how many ppl that you would consider "intelligent" have not devoted as much time to their physical appearance as they have to their intellect? I think its pretty stereotypical to assume that a person is more intelligent than someone else based solely on their muscle mass. I dont think the two are related in any significant sense.