Author Topic: Recarving Up The Middle East  (Read 1602 times)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Recarving Up The Middle East
« on: June 10, 2010, 07:42:10 AM »
Hopefully you can all see what is really going on in the Middle East by way of these pics. The goal is of course the OIL!!!!, but recarving up the region into even more controllable regions is the goal. Now it can be seen why everyone is fighting not only for their lives,...but for their countries and its boarders as well...

BEFORE




AFTER

C

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2010, 09:19:32 AM »
You didn't make Israel big enough or include a buffer zone.

Additionally, Iraq wasn't spit to create Kurdistan.

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2010, 11:52:44 AM »
You didn't make Israel big enough or include a buffer zone.

Additionally, Iraq wasn't spit to create Kurdistan.

I did not make this map, this is what america and Europe want to do to the Middle East. So far as Israhell goes...you seem not to realize that america does not need them anymore being that they are in Iraq, Kuwait and desire Iran. Once they have secured all three, the new coast line to the Mediterranean sea will be Jordan an Syria...

Note that Turkey and Iran lose land mass to create this Kurdistan parcel, which just so happens to be an OIL RICH AREA...hmmmmm
C

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2010, 09:17:58 PM »

Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia all lose land on that new map. Jordan gains tho.
I don't see it happening.
w

the_steevo_uk

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 787
  • Getbig!
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2010, 02:38:25 AM »
The impossibility of implementing those sorts of changes means that I have more chance of seeing my grandmother return from the dead than this map ever becoming a reality.

One of the main things that strikes me is armenia, why does Azerbajan expand at its expense (not even a mention of Nagorno Karabakh!!) Kurdistan as it stands today does not extend that far north, surely move the borders of Armenia West and slightly east as well.

Next point expanding Afghanistan is sheer insanity, the country has such weak state functions that increasing its size would cause even more chaos. Even if it creates territorial contiguity for the Pashtuns, and takes away the troublesome NWF province from Pakistan I can hardly see anyone really wanting a change like that in practice. Best leave the Pak military to deal with their side of the border, they do a good job of bashing taliban.

Point three, good luck with trying to carve up Iran, Im pretty sure that will go down well with the folks there. As for carving up Turkey, you got a snowball's chance in hell with that one succeeding.

Point Four, what on God's green earth is the point in expanding Yemen north, the country can hardly hold together as it is? Surely more likely to revert to the old North and South Yemen if you want control.

Point five Kashmir...that will be fun trying to get the Pakistanis Indians and Chinese to agree on some sort of resettlement there without the entire world being engulfed in a Nuclear fireball. Im sure all three of them would just love to let the Afghans take that part of the region.

So whoever came up with this bright idea better get ready for the end of humanity, cos thats basically would result from this map being put in place.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2010, 04:18:15 AM »
SAMSON.

I GIVE YOU CREDIT FOR BEING AN APE THAT IS SEMI LITERATE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. HOWEVER, IN EVERY OTHER AREA OF LIFE YOU ARE AN APPALLING FAILURE. MOST OF ALL, YOU ARE INCREDIBLY STUPID AND GULLIBLE. THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO AGREES WITH YOUR NONSENSE IS YOU (JAG). EVERYONE ELSE THINKS YOUR A BRAINLESS *UCKWAD WHO SMEARS FECES ON HIS OWN KEYBOARD.

HOPE THIS HELPS.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2010, 05:51:16 AM »
As wild as some of Samson's theories may be, they pale in comparison to your notion that he and I are the same people.
w

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2010, 08:22:39 AM »
SAMSON.

I GIVE YOU CREDIT FOR BEING AN APE THAT IS SEMI LITERATE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. HOWEVER, IN EVERY OTHER AREA OF LIFE YOU ARE AN APPALLING FAILURE. MOST OF ALL, YOU ARE INCREDIBLY STUPID AND GULLIBLE. THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO AGREES WITH YOUR NONSENSE IS YOU (JAG). EVERYONE ELSE THINKS YOUR A BRAINLESS *UCKWAD WHO SMEARS FECES ON HIS OWN KEYBOARD.

HOPE THIS HELPS.

Wise men have always been condemned by the ignorant...should I therefore expect anything less from you?

BTW check your keyboard, youre caps key is in the LOCKED position, get a English composition book so you can learn about grammatical errors which your post is full of....above all before you conclude your post with HOPE THIS HELPS...make sure you have provided something of value for someone to have learned from...which you haven't.

Hope this helps
C

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2010, 08:26:16 AM »
Wise men have always been condemned by the ignorant...should I therefore expect anything less from you?

BTW check your keyboard, youre caps key is in the LOCKED position, get a English composition book so you can learn about grammatical errors which your post is full of....above all before you conclude your post with HOPE THIS HELPS...make sure you have provided something of value for someone to have learned from...which you haven't.

Hope this helps

Hahaha, practice what you preach, stupid fuck. It's "an" English composition book, not "a" English composition book. This is taught in elementary school.

And despite what you may think, "...." is not proper grammar. It's how the retarded and uneducated type. George Whorewell bitch-slapped you something fierce.


As for this thread, those pictures were ripped off yet another tinfoil hat, widely discredited CT site.  :)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2010, 09:08:51 AM »
Hahaha, practice what you preach, stupid fuck. It's "an" English composition book, not "a" English composition book. This is taught in elementary school.

And despite what you may think, "...." is not proper grammar. It's how the retarded and uneducated type. George Whorewell bitch-slapped you something fierce.


As for this thread, those pictures were ripped off yet another tinfoil hat, widely discredited CT site.  :)

It is A...but coming from you it does not matter as the whole of your life is an illiterate post.
C

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2010, 09:13:15 AM »
It is A...but coming from you it does not matter as the whole of your life is an illiterate post.

Sorry, you stupid fuck, but it's not. Nor is your constant use of "...." as punctuation anything remotely close to proper grammar. My, my, someone seems hell-bent on proving how ridiculously stupid they are. Did you make it out of elementary school? At this point, I seriously doubt you even have a GED. :)

Here's some help from Purdue University:

How do you know when to use the indefinite articles?

"A" goes before all words that begin with consonants.

a cat
a dog
a purple onion
a buffalo
a big apple

With one exception: Use "an" before unsounded h.

an honorable peace
an honest error

"An" goes before all words that begin with vowels:

an apricot
an egg
an Indian
an orbit
an uprising

With two exceptions: When u makes the same sound as the y in you, or o makes the same sound as w in won, then a is used.

a union
a united front
a unicorn
a used napkin
a U.S. ship
a one-legged man

Note: The choice of article is actually based upon the phonetic (sound) quality of the first letter in a word, not on the orthographic (written) representation of the letter. If the first letter makes a vowel-type sound, you use "an"; if the first letter would make a consonant-type sound, you use "a." So, if you consider the rule from a phonetic perspective, there aren't any exceptions. Since the 'h' hasn't any phonetic representation, no audible sound, in the first exception, the sound that follows the article is a vowel; consequently, 'an' is used. In the second exception, the word-initial 'y' sound (unicorn) is actually a glide [j] phonetically, which has consonantal properties; consequently, it is treated as a consonant, requiring 'a'.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/591/01/

Take it in and realize that you're a retard that is in no position to criticize the grammatical errors of others. Nice self-owning, though.

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2010, 09:53:51 AM »
Sorry, you stupid fuck, but it's not. Nor is your constant use of "...." as punctuation anything remotely close to proper grammar. My, my, someone seems hell-bent on proving how ridiculously stupid they are. Did you make it out of elementary school? At this point, I seriously doubt you even have a GED. :)

Here's some help from Purdue University:

How do you know when to use the indefinite articles?

"A" goes before all words that begin with consonants.

a cat
a dog
a purple onion
a buffalo
a big apple

With one exception: Use "an" before unsounded h.

an honorable peace
an honest error

"An" goes before all words that begin with vowels:

an apricot
an egg
an Indian
an orbit
an uprising

With two exceptions: When u makes the same sound as the y in you, or o makes the same sound as w in won, then a is used.

a union
a united front
a unicorn
a used napkin
a U.S. ship
a one-legged man

Note: The choice of article is actually based upon the phonetic (sound) quality of the first letter in a word, not on the orthographic (written) representation of the letter. If the first letter makes a vowel-type sound, you use "an"; if the first letter would make a consonant-type sound, you use "a." So, if you consider the rule from a phonetic perspective, there aren't any exceptions. Since the 'h' hasn't any phonetic representation, no audible sound, in the first exception, the sound that follows the article is a vowel; consequently, 'an' is used. In the second exception, the word-initial 'y' sound (unicorn) is actually a glide [j] phonetically, which has consonantal properties; consequently, it is treated as a consonant, requiring 'a'.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/591/01/

Take it in and realize that you're a retard that is in no position to criticize the grammatical errors of others. Nice self-owning, though.


Grammatical correctness was used in the sentence. Maybe you should have read the sentence again before making a further ass of yourself with the Purdue cut and paste. Now what can be done about your gushing stupidity? Is there a website that can be cut and pasted into your brain ? ...or is that wishful thinking on my part?
C

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Recarving Up The Middle East
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2010, 09:56:51 AM »
Grammatical correctness was used in the sentence. Maybe you should have read the sentence again before making a further ass of yourself with the Purdue cut and paste. Now what can be done about your gushing stupidity? Is there a website that can be cut and pasted into your brain ? ...or is that wishful thinking on my part?

There was not a single thing grammatically correct about any part of your post. You don't punctuate correctly nor can you differentiate between the proper use of "a" or "an". Allow me to me help you out because you seem to be completely handicapped. Using "...." where periods or commas should be used makes you look like the uneducated piece of garbage that you are.  :)

If you really want to embarrass yourself, type "a English" and "an English" into google and see what gives you actual responses. And for what it's worth, the only thing wrong with George's post is that it's in all-caps, but that's because he's emphasizing emotion.