Spare us the political handwringing over "Burn a Qur'an Day"

[Fury]

This is an opinion peace I came across last night and I think it does a great job taking to task the apologists, scumbags and people claiming that this will lead to more violence.




The Democrats and liberal media are frothing at the mouth over some lousy burning Qur’ans. But where were the stern faces and heartfelt concern for the troops’ safety from 2002-2009 when the NY Times leaked confidential secrets involving National Security, when Abu Ghraib photos were front page news every day for a year, not to mention the WikiLeaks Document Dump that poses a far greater danger to the troops than a few crispy Qur’ans.

And what about all the Qur’ans that were incinerated as insurgents blew up and continue to blow up mosques in the Middle East?

Was Hillary wearing her Muslim hijab when she offered her “unequivocal condemnation of this disrespectful, disgraceful act?” AG Eric Holder called the pastor “idiotic and dangerous,” something he refrained from saying about the Fort Hood Shooter. Gen David Petraeus repeated the same statement that I heard from the White House, “Were the actual burning to take place, the safety of our soldiers and civilians would be put in jeopardy and accomplishment of the mission would be made more difficult.” So there’s no way to know if those were his thoughts or an Obama speechwriter’s.

Funny there is never any handwringing when Muslims insult Americans as they do  on a regular basis both here an abroad.

Did you even see this video on the 6:00 News when the Islamic Thinkers Society desecrated our flag and trashed our country (where they have chosen to reside) right in the streets of Midtown Manhattan? Free Speech double standards, indeed.
I suggest we call ‘Burn a Qur’an Day’ an eye for an eye.

It's funny. The MSM felt compelled to plaster those Abu Ghraib pictures EVERYWHERE and are directly responsible for getting Nicholas Berg beheaded as well as having the blood of countless others who died in the reprisal attacks on their hands. In a time of war the MSM was posting pictures that they knew would lead to mass violence. But that was OK. The NY Times and other rags had no qualms with posting up the real names of Afghan informants with the Wikileaks incident.

But NOW they feel compelled to take the moral high road and not burn some korans to prevent violence. What a sad joke.

[240 is Back]

see, really, if some d-bag was burning a flag on my block... i don't care what religion he is... i'd walk away nonchalent, dropping my cheeseburger.

Then I'd drive to the ghetto and purchase as many rabid pitbulls I could find.  Then I'd release them 100 feet from the cheeseburgers and drive away.

You know, little solutions like that can work.  Yes, the people have a legal right to do it.  But you also have a legal right to do irritating shit to chase them away.

[Purge_WTF]

  Definitely a double standard at play here.

[Fury]

see, really, if some d-bag was burning a flag on my block... i don't care what religion he is... i'd walk away nonchalent, dropping my cheeseburger.

Then I'd drive to the ghetto and purchase as many rabid pitbulls I could find.  Then I'd release them 100 feet from the cheeseburgers and drive away.

You know, little solutions like that can work.  Yes, the people have a legal right to do it.  But you also have a legal right to do irritating shit to chase them away.

Well, Americans aren't that intolerant. I guarantee that if you substituted a koran for the flag in that video and did it in any Muslim country that you would be dead within 24 hours. I guarantee it.

[BM OUT]

see, really, if some d-bag was burning a flag on my block... i don't care what religion he is... i'd walk away nonchalent, dropping my cheeseburger.

Then I'd drive to the ghetto and purchase as many rabid pitbulls I could find.  Then I'd release them 100 feet from the cheeseburgers and drive away.

You know, little solutions like that can work.  Yes, the people have a legal right to do it.  But you also have a legal right to do irritating shit to chase them away.

You mean like building a mosque at ground zero?

[240 is Back]

well, that's how they do shit over there.  i could care less.  let them throw shitfits in the streets.  yes, anyone who would go there and do that would get in a mess quickly, which is why SENSIBLE PPL DON"T VACATION IN NUTTY COUNTRIES LIKE THAT.

I don't plan on vacationing over there, so I don't care what they do.  if they bring that shit here, respect their rights, but release the hounds

[240 is Back]

yeah, if some hate-filled punks built a place like that on my block, i wouldn't whine about it.  I'd supersoaker spray it with deer pisso n random nights until the place was so unpleasant, their visitor base dried up and they went outta business

you know, little irritating shit like that.  What's the po-po charge for public pisssoaking?  We can all take a charge now and then like that.

[Fury]

Well, how we do shit over here is that the constitution lets someone burn a koran or bible if they feel like it. So why are people bitching about that while turning a blind eye to all the double standard bullshit being played?

The other points in that piece are more important than the video of some dirtbags desecrating the flag.

[240 is Back]

i dont care about ppl bitching about this or that.

i dont care what the left cries about, and i dont care what the right whines about.

if that drama comes to my block, i'll put on a happy face, and fvck with them for my own amusement until they vamoose.

Other than that... whatever... make that noise somewhere else, pal.