Author Topic: And You Thought The TSA Screanings Were Bad...Look At what Is Coming Next  (Read 1589 times)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Sunday, February 27, 2011
DNA "Genetic Patdown" Introduced to Airports by DHS
NetBio -- Rapid DNA Analysis Solutions
Nicholas West



A new level of invasive screening is scheduled for airports this summer:  a portable DNA scanner to conduct on-site, real-time genetic testing.

This technology is being implemented under the cover of combating human trafficking, illegal immigration, and finding missing persons, but Richard Seldon of NetBio, creator of the scanners, clearly states that "DNA information has the potential to become part of the fabric of day-to-day life." In an interview with Katie Drummond who broke this story for The Daily, Seldon envisions additional applications in emergency rooms, food safety tests, and law enforcement.

DNA collection is actually nothing new, as the Pentagon has admitted that it currently has a DNA database with 80,000 suspected foreign terrorists on it, and growing daily.  However, this collection apparatus has been secretly in place for Americans as well.  Lawsuits are pending from families who uncovered a secret program to collect DNA from babies and store it in a military database.  However, that was a secret that had to be uncovered.  The fact that DNA screening is being rolled out openly marks a new level of blatant tyranny in America.

To a certain extent, DNA collection already has become part of the fabric of day-to-day life; police in America have had the authority to conduct warrantless searches since 2009 by taking blood and saliva during arrests, even from those not convicted of a crime.  This has quickly morphed into DNA being taken through mandatory blood tests at DUI checkpoints in Florida.

It has been argued that DNA extraction is no different than taking fingerprints.  This argument is patently absurd, due to the simple fact that fingerprints have no bearing on one's genetic information . . . or manipulation.  It is the genetic information of individuals that has been the holy grail of all tyrannies as the endgame for their control grid.

The current focus on DNA extraction and databasing is a well-known globalist initiative stated by the UN to register every newborn.  This initiative has the full support of globalist and population-control advocate, Bill Gates, who would like to see a universal birth registry which would presumably tie in to his universal vaccine program.  Additionally, globalist behemoths such as the RAND Corporation have issued documents that identify an interest in biotechnology for the purpose of population reduction, cloning, and to "identify, understand, manipulate, improve, and control living organisms (including ourselves)."

It is important to note that the technology of tracking, tracing, and databasing innocent people right down to their blood is a top-down directive from federal agencies, not a legitimate scientific endeavor.  Legitimate science researches ways to increase human potential and freedom, not use it as a system for identification and control.  With the rise of nanotechnology as a federal initiative, we should strongly resist the collection of our life force to be used in any way that government-controlled science sees fit.

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/02/dna-genetic-patdown-introduced-to.html
C

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39897
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: And You Thought The TSA Screanings Were Bad...Look At what Is Coming Next
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2011, 05:53:19 PM »
Feds to let airport screeners gain union rights
 OneNewsNow ^ | FEBRUARY 4, 2011 | Chris Woodward





A union leader says the government has decided to grant collective bargaining rights to the nation's 40,000 airport screeners... Republican opponents say that could jeopardize national security.

James Sherk, a labor expert at The Heritage Foundation, calls the decision a huge loss for airline security and passengers. He says there is a reason that most national security agencies by law do not have unions -- and that is because the union contracts make it more difficult for them to do their jobs.

"Canada has a system where they allow their security screeners to unionize -- and they've had problems where, over Thanksgiving, they won't go on strike, but what they'll do is insist on hand-inspecting every piece of luggage," explains Sherk. "So you get enormous backlog and enormous delays for [airline passengers] because the unions are trying to exhort pressure on the company to give them what they want at the negotiations."

Sherk has other concerns as well. "With a union contract, it's very difficult to fire poor performers," he states. "It's difficult to move workers where you need them, when you need them. The potential for a labor action would be catastrophic."

TSA badgeKatie Gage, head of the Workforce Fairness Institute, says the Obama administration is paying back big labor for its support by agreeing to grant collective bargaining rights to airport screeners. "At the time that [Barack Obama] was first elected, it was made very clear by folks within the ranks of organized labor that they expected a payback on that front."

Gage does not think it is a great idea if the country started to unionize the Coast Guard, for example -- adding that it certainly does not make sense to put an agency responsible for the nation's security under control of big labor bosses...


(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...