Author Topic: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims  (Read 844 times)

AlphaMaleDawg

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2881
study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
« on: November 02, 2011, 11:31:47 AM »
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/fat-free-mass-index-in-users-and-nonusers-of-anabolic-androgen-steroids-research-review.html

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2011, 11:43:46 AM »
lyle mcdonald is very accurate and no bullshit

people mock him because he's small and weak

they want to be fed lies by lying hormonized fools who are big and strong (because of the hormones)

berblexer

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 784
Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2011, 11:45:34 AM »
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

haha 1.8 is actually 5'11, who's unable to convert eh?
Team Pat Banana

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2011, 12:08:20 PM »
once again, he is right about the natural limit. 1.80m equals 5'9 for those of you unable to convert height.

http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/fat-free-mass-index-in-users-and-nonusers-of-anabolic-androgen-steroids-research-review.html
The article gives a higher muscular weight for naturals than gh15 said..

AlphaMaleDawg

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2881
Re: study about natural vs drug users that backs up gh15's claims
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2011, 12:11:10 PM »
haha 1.8 is actually 5'11, who's unable to convert eh?

blame it on my google search