Sure, I'll agree to an extent with that. But a bank can only get "too big" with the help of government largesse. Huntsman's plan doesn't address the actual problem, it only proposes draconian regulations and taxes. If anything, Huntsman's plan will make the financial system less efficient and will greatly harm our economy.
I agree - I was one of the only ones against TARP from Day 1.
If you agree, then why are you championing Huntsman (who supported TARP) and his ridiculous Big Government financial regulatory plan?
I am in favor of RP / Bachmann but after that A B O
I am already long prepared to do things electorally I once never thought unimaginable in order to get Maobama and his fat nasty angry looting wife gone. They are a plague.
A Paul/Huntsman ticket is something I could get behind.
Republicans trust Huntsman even less than Romney.
And they believed Palin was competent.And they believed Cain was innocent.And they believed Perry was wise.And they believed Newt was never a lobbyist. SO much for their judgment.
What about Gary Johnson?
Rand Paul is the man... Much more articulate than his father. A better approach to foreign policy I think, but he's still faithful to the same principles. In a few years we might hope for a Rand Paul presidency. But perhaps the next election we can hope for a solid Gary Johnson run?
