I'm not goig to bother hacking through the usual Rolling Stone anti-capitalist crapola, but using the term "sipohoned" implies that Romney improperly gained access to funds and benefitted directly from that...is tht what you're stating?
So far as the $10 million deal goes...is there something improper about the deal or are you suggesting that as a capitlist Romney should limit the scope of his business to private sector deals? I must say...that sounds kinda stupid on it's face.