Is the CIA in Your Underwear?

[IroNat]

 

https://original.antiwar.com/andrew-p-napolitano/2023/09/07/is-the-cia-in-your-underwear/

In a year, if a friend asks you if the CIA is in your underwear, you’d probably not take the question seriously. You’d be wrong. The CIA is spending millions in tax dollars to get into your underwear next year.

[tacobender]

Then I’ll just keep wearing the same ones over and over

[Gym Rat]

Then I’ll just keep wearing the same ones over and over

Or none at all... But only "Dugdales" can get away with that.
I dont like when my hog flaps all over...

[Grape Ape]

Then I’ll just keep wearing the same ones over and over

Gross, considering all the taco bowel leakage

[Lartinos]

“ In this article, Andrew P. Napolitano discusses the CIA's history of domestic spying without search warrants, including recent developments related to the development of "smart clothing" with recording capabilities. Napolitano questions the government's respect for individual privacy rights and the lack of congressional oversight in addressing warrantless surveillance.”

[joswift]

if they enjoy hearing me fart all day then good luck to them

[tacobender]

if they enjoy hearing me fart all day then good luck to them

queef

[oldtimer1]

The microwaves and dishwashers have listening devices that can be remotely activated?  Please.

 What is true that most Smart TV's run through your router and they do have listening devices. Same as your phone. I was in a restaurant talking to women at the next table who said they were traveling nurses. Their agency puts them up in hotels in other states when they have have a temp contract to fill in hospitals that are short nurses. My phone was off on the restaurant table. Next day on facebook I had an ad for an agency that found housing for traveling nurses. Stuff like that has happened time and time again.

[Tapeworm]

Napolitano is so so. I've tuned in a fair bit. He shills hard, which is offputting. And he sounds like my high school principal. "Guh mawwwning."

I thought he'd cover the Trump cases more, what with being a magistrate and all, but he spends most of his podcast on Ukraine. Not the illegitimate money printing to pay for it. Not the means by which government has been captured by the war machine. Not the propaganda campaigns the US is subjected to. Just developments on the ground in Ukraine, which is cool news but he's not a military analyst. His whole schtick is he's a Libertarian judge so he signs off with "Judge Napolitano, looking out for your liberty." Ok, dude. Maybe you'll say something relevant to that next time.

We're kinda post covid but not really, in a retarded war, open border, rampant inflation and record breaking money printing, constantly surveilled and censored in the flesh and online, and on the cusp of a CBDC. Not exactly barren ground for a Libertarian pundit but he'd rather talk about how the Ukrainian infantry has a desertion problem.