if the US wanted to attack their own embassy to incite another war, they could have simply blown it up with a missle and then blamed it on terrorists. if they wanted this to happen it would have been too easy, not a failure. instead it was a failed attack, and our gov publically acknowledged and even thanked the SYRIANS who saved our embassy...not something to do if they were trying to incite hate for them.
i have no reason to believe this was an Inside Job, aside from the fact it might justify US action in Syria.
That being said, to fire a missile at a US embassy involves a lot of people and computers. Lots of people on the scene with cell phone cameras taking pics of any missile debris with USA written on it. Lots of people who could look at the facts and see who was in the region the day before, where the missile came from. Plus you have freaking websites that can now take pics from space for $50 each with their own satellite.
So you see, outsourcing the job to a couple of militant/mercinary/fooled people isn't a bad idea at all. They might F it up, as they did, but you don't have a paper trail.
I want to know how CNN knew it was alquida right away. I was watching at 3 or 4 am when the news broke, and they told us it was AlQ before they told us about survivors. So they seemed to know that early on