joker, thanks. I absolutel do not want to prove a conspiracy. I simply want to show enough doubt exists on the official story that we should initiate a second investigation.
The more people who know about it - the more people who see the oddities ("wait, how did we get all that molten steel when jet fuel can't get hot enough to melt steel?"), the more likely they are going to be, to vote for someone who wants a second investigation.
My goal is a second 911 commission, one that is truly independent (9 of the first 10 had worked for bush 1 in the pvt sector at one time or another LOL!)
If they would just address the questions the families had, test the damn metal for explosive residue, and ask NORAD why they lied about their actions that day, we'd be closer to the truth. We can research a bulldozed building for decades, but you put one liar from NORAD on the stand, make him accountable for his lies, and offer jail or leniency, and you might learn more in one afternoon than you would in 30 years of debates.
ReOpen 911. Investigate it. We don't have to convict anyone here - my only goal is showing reasonable doubt on the official story- and I think even the most ardent bush supporter will say "yeah there are holes and some oddities". If bush didn't know and didn't do it, he shouldn't have a damn thing to worry about. If NORAD didn't LET the planes hit, then they have nothing to fear.
But this lying - changing stories, classifying everything - that is some bullshit. And I love my country too much to let her turn into garbage because people are too afraid to question bullshit when it's fed to them. reOpen 911. That's it.