If we are saying that having muscles is unwomanly then we can also say having a dominant personality and being successful in business are not womanly. That a woman should stay at home with the kids, be soft and obey her man is the ultimate goal of being feminine because that is the way it was for hundreds of years (and the way it still is in many parts of this world.) Fortunately ideals change and what people are attracted to changes. I think the more that muscular females are displayed in a positive light in the media, the more acceptance and sex appeal they will hold for the general public.
Surely, anyone who is knowledgeable and dedicated to the physical life admires ALL-NATURAL feminine muscularity! I think it is as sexy as hell!! IMO, it's "light-years" ahead of the bird-legged, pipe-stem armed, borderline anorexic, media models and movie stars.
Anyone who says that all-natural muscle on a woman is "unwomanly/unfeminine" is simply IGNORANT and/or a couch-potato!
Women can be VERY strong (naturally) with two excellent historical cases in point...Katrina Sandwina and Jan Todd ("google them" to get educated...if necessary).
And, women can have fabulous figures developed through all-natural BB (e.g. Getbig's "own" Jodi, "Insomnia", and "Chamorrita"....to name a few).
At the risk of repeating myself, what destroyed competitive FBB in the public eye were the contest promoters/judges who, in emphasizing a progressively "bigger and tighter" look year-after-year, created a "she-he" look that ONLY doping/pharmaceuticals can support!! How can competitive FBB now "scale back down" to the "good ole" 'golden era' days of the 80's"...when fitness and figure competitors NOW have that SAME general public appealing, "much-more-feminine", look??!
How can FBB competition now backtrack/retrench to its former glory??! Aren't these FBBers permanently boxed in to "she-he" land by figure/fitness?! Am I missing something here??! Someone more knowledge on this subject please help me out?!