What the hell does your example have to do with Rob's
?
I'm sorry I have to dumb this down for you, but here goes. The thrust of 240's argument was that we shouldn't worry about stopping police from dealing drugs because North Korea has nuclear capabilities.
My analogy used murder (substitute for drugs, okay?) and Cuba's human rights violations (thus the influx of people across the US border). Both are entirely undesirable from the perspective of the US government, as drug dealing and usage and North Korea's new found weaponry. Catching on yet?
My point is that we don't necessarily have to stop pursuing one act of unlawfulness simply because there are other troubles in the world. Rob is right to point out scarceness of resources, but for me, taking one cop off the streets in New York hardly substitutes for one less illegal immigrant over the border.