« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: phil heath shafted  (Read 2385 times)

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
phil heath shafted
« on: March 04, 2007, 11:02:29 PM »
anyone agree phil should have placed higher?he was peeled to the bone and he was not lacking in mass department.crazy glutes hes a very good candidate for an olympia title in the future
Logged
i

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2007, 11:03:51 PM »
He should of placed ahead of Gustavo for sure, but that's as far as it goes.  I had him 4th.
Logged
Ron: "I am lazy."

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2007, 11:07:35 PM »
did i read that right, he should have been placed higher due to "crazy glutes"  ::)

oh brother.
Logged
Z

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2007, 11:09:34 PM »
Quote from: G o a t b o y on March 04, 2007, 11:03:51 PM
He should of placed ahead of Gustavo for sure, but that's as far as it goes.  I had him 4th.

I actually had him 3rd myself... but I can see people going with Freeman over him.
Logged

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2007, 11:43:34 PM »
put your glasses on he looked really dry in the photos i seen , i think vic was off tony freeman look decent but i fell heath looked dry and in about two years hell be a strong contender.he needs to bring legs up a tad but he looked great.awesome future ahead of him
Logged
i

Gene

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2007, 11:55:20 PM »
Quote from: bigkubby on March 04, 2007, 11:02:29 PM
anyone agree phil should have placed higher?he was peeled to the bone and he was not lacking in mass department.crazy glutes hes a very good candidate for an olympia title in the future
Yes at least 1 shot higher
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2007, 01:02:56 AM »
I had him AT LEAST 3rd place.  :-\
Logged

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2007, 10:26:33 PM »
he has an awesome physique crazy glutes nice arms .he will get wider with time ,and once he fills in his frame widens up a little he will no doubt be very tough to beat i can see him surpassing vic and dex time is on his side and he looks great his glutes remind me of ronnies and his arms remind me of flex wheelers hell be the next flex but with a couple of olympias under him
Logged
i

XXXII/LX

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
  • I have to return some video tapes.
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2007, 07:24:25 AM »
Quote from: bigkubby on March 06, 2007, 10:26:33 PM
he has an awesome physique crazy glutes nice arms .he will get wider with time ,and once he fills in his frame widens up a little he will no doubt be very tough to beat i can see him surpassing vic and dex time is on his side and he looks great his glutes remind me of ronnies and his arms remind me of flex wheelers hell be the next flex but with a couple of olympias under him

Please touch a little more on "Frame Widening" as it confuses me?

Thorz "I don't understand what the fuck you're saying" Hammer
Logged

Nuge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 447
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2007, 08:01:54 AM »
Should have gone

1. Vic
2. Dex
3. PHIL
4. Toney
5. Samuel
6. GHGutell
Logged
Repent, or join me!

adipo8

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1045
  • Getbig!
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2007, 02:31:01 PM »
Quote from: Nuge on March 07, 2007, 08:01:54 AM
Should have gone

1. Vic
2. Dex
3. PHIL
4. Toney
5. Samuel
6. GHGutell
Logged

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2007, 11:20:47 PM »
Logged
i

Nuge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 447
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2007, 11:53:01 PM »
Quote from: adipo8 on March 07, 2007, 02:31:01 PM


I continue to think that Phil should have placed higher than Badell. Badell has more muscle, but so does Ruhl... and everyone... 
Logged
Repent, or join me!

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2007, 01:00:33 AM »
id like to shaft him
Logged
i

tweeter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2180
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2007, 01:02:12 AM »
Looks like Phil might have the start of a little gut going on; atleast, bigger than it was at last years shows.
Logged

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2007, 06:12:17 AM »
Quote from: G o a t b o y on March 04, 2007, 11:03:51 PM
He should of placed ahead of Gustavo for sure, but that's as far as it goes.  I had him 4th.

yeah i agree with that, Toney's pec tear is pretty noticable though, still with dimentions like that its had to deny him.



Logged

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: phil heath shafted
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2007, 06:36:55 AM »
Quote from: Wingnut32 on March 08, 2007, 06:17:57 AM
heath and guttavo should have been swapped

other than that, good placements

what about branch?? ok his color sucked, but other than that he looked awesome, ripped, huge and small waste. i had him 5th.

I think Gustavo is way overated, he loked awesome at 2004 Mr O but sinse then he has a bloated gut and he has never had the same condition.

i think it shud have been

1 vic
2 dex
3 toney
4 heath
5 branch
6 samuel
with Gustavo maybe 7th
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »