72,600,000 conspiracy nuts

[ribonucleic]

Anyone who can watch this and still accept the 9/11 Commission Report is someone who refuses - probably out of sheer intellectual laziness (hi, Bum!) - to think for themselves.

http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-2179339594842383954

Forget the video of the building coming straight down. Forget the firemen saying the building is going to come down.

It shows pictures of other skyscrapers that didn't collapse when every single window on the floor had flames pouring out. Then it shows WTC7 with two or three isolated pockets of subdued fire.

And this is supposed to be what brought down a skyscraper for the first and only time in all of architectural history.

Give me a fucking break. 

[ToxicAvenger]

I'm dubious of those claims, a 3-4% measure of accuracy is just too much when polling 1,010 people and extrapolating out for the entire voting age country. I agree that more people think something is fishy about 9/11 but the 72,600,000 number I won't believe until everyone is polled.

The subject is too far fetched and the number is simply too high to be believable.

stat 101

its an easy course

[Hedgehog]

Forgive me for asking Hedge I just can't recall...aren't you a CTer?

Never was, never will be.

If there are any evidence that there was a self-employed attack, then sure, I will accept that. Wouldn't most people?

But I'm not gonna grasp for different kinds of conspiracies.

Until there are any kind of evidence, I don't buy it.

Conspiracy Theory per se is something I find very unattractive.

I will admit that I believe that Kennedy wasn't killed by Oswald, but rather by a larger group of men. I can't say who they were though. That's as far as CT'ing you will get me.


My take on CT'ers is pretty clear: These guys live in a fantasy world, and have problems keeping reality and fiction apart. They watch too many movies.

-Hedge

[Dos Equis]

My take on CT'ers is pretty clear: These guys live in a fantasy world, and have problems keeping reality and fiction apart. They watch too many movies.

-Hedge

I agree.

[militarymuscle69]

Never was, never will be.

If there are any evidence that there was a self-employed attack, then sure, I will accept that. Wouldn't most people?

But I'm not gonna grasp for different kinds of conspiracies.

Until there are any kind of evidence, I don't buy it.

Conspiracy Theory per se is something I find very unattractive.

I will admit that I believe that Kennedy wasn't killed by Oswald, but rather by a larger group of men. I can't say who they were though. That's as far as CT'ing you will get me.


My take on CT'ers is pretty clear: These guys live in a fantasy world, and have problems keeping reality and fiction apart. They watch too many movies.

-Hedge

Cool man, I just wasn't sure

[240 is Back]

I will admit that I believe that Kennedy wasn't killed by Oswald, but rather by a larger group of men. I can't say who they were though. That's as far as CT'ing you will get me.

THe only difference here is TIME.

In 1968, you might not have been open to the JFK possibilities, or level of evidence, that you are in 2007.

Likewise, if we have this many questions/holes in the 9/11 story already... one can only imagine the level of 911 skeptics by the time 2030 or 2040 rolls around. 

IMO, it'll end up just like JFK.  He was killed and the military industrial complex quickly took power and got us into vietnam and a huge pattern of interfering with other nations' operations.  I think in 40 years, people will see 911 as the self attack used to justify a series of mid east invasions.  And just like 9/11, no one will ever see a jail cell.

[Cavalier22]

If you had a poll asking "Do you think that no plane really hit the pentagon but it was a missile from the plane and the plane flew away"

im sure you would get 36%

If you asked "Do you think those planes that hit 9/11 were really halograms?"

Im sure you would get 36%

[ieffinhatecardio]

stat 101

its an easy course

The stats course I had to take for my major was Statistics 246 or 286 or 346, something like that. Thanks for the tip though.

By the way, I'm still curious how a sampling of 1010 can be extrapolated out to account for more than 200,000,000 people with near complete accuracy. People have different beliefs in different parts of the country. What's true for New York might not be true for Texas or Oklahoma. I'm still skeptical of this polls accuracy.

[militarymuscle69]

The stats course I had to take for my major was Statistics 246 or 286 or 346, something like that. Thanks for the tip though.

By the way, I'm still curious how a sampling of 1010 can be extrapolated out to account for more than 200,000,000 people with near complete accuracy. People have different beliefs in different parts of the country. What's true for New York might not be true for Texas or Oklahoma. I'm still skeptical of this polls accuracy.

I think we hit 300,000,000 million this year. I'm sure that wouldn't throw it off though....lol

[240 is Back]

I think we hit 300,000,000 million this year. I'm sure that wouldn't throw it off though....lol

You continue to embarass yourself:

There are 217.8 million people in the United States who are 18 or over.

God, you are stupid.  Did you not understand the numbers Ribo posted, or did you just skip over them?

[militarymuscle69]

You continue to embarass yourself:

God, you are stupid.  Did you not understand the numbers Ribo posted, or did you just skip over them?

There are still 300,000,000+ americans. And it wouldn't suprise me if the left polled 1000+ 3rd graders for their numbers. Do you have to ask if I look at Ribo's posts? That nut job is worse than you.

[240 is Back]

There are still 300,000,000+ americans. And it wouldn't suprise me if the left polled 1000+ 3rd graders for their numbers. Do you have to ask if I look at Ribo's posts? That nut job is worse than you.

We're only counting people over the age of 18.

You didn't read that.

Now, in the last 3 days, you have:

1) Admitted that part of the reason you kill in Iraq is oil
2) Admitted you spoke authoratively on world oil resources without knowing anything about them
3) Admitted you joined into this argument without even reading the first post, which set a very important premise for this discussion.  And, you were a smartass to a person who understood this, because you did not.

I think it's safe to say you are a stupid man, mm69.

[militarymuscle69]

We're only counting people over the age of 18.

You didn't read that.

Now, in the last 3 days, you have:

1) Admitted that part of the reason you kill in Iraq is oil
2) Admitted you spoke authoratively on world oil resources without knowing anything about them
3) Admitted you joined into this argument without even reading the first post, which set a very important premise for this discussion.  And, you were a smartass to a person who understood this, because you did not.

I think it's safe to say you are a stupid man, mm69.

actually thanks for putting words in my outh...
1. never admitted that (see my response in the other thread)
2. authoratively? lol
3.  Ribo is an idiot

[240 is Back]

3.  Ribo is an idiot

Ribo is smarter than you. 

You might find ten people here who completely disagree with his politics or views.

But you won't find one person who says mm69 is smarter than him.



So if he is smarter, and you call him an idiot, that puts you at sub-idiot level.

[militarymuscle69]

Ribo is smarter than you. 

You might find ten people here who completely disagree with his politics or views.

But you won't find one person who says mm69 is smarter than him.



So if he is smarter, and you call him an idiot, that puts you at sub-idiot level.

OK I'll play cardio...prove he is smarter!! lol