Author Topic: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan  (Read 2858 times)

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« on: April 21, 2009, 07:59:30 PM »
Finally agreed with one of the decisions.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2009, 08:50:32 PM »
ya i think this one was pretty obvious, i agreed with the first two pretty much as well the indian over the gladiator, if the gladiator got in close of course he would win but they said the majority of the wins for the indian came from his bow and with the gladiator with no armor what do you expect?

I agreed with the samurai as well but i think that one was a little closer again though range and accuracy of the bow of the samurai is going to trump the viking just about every time.

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2009, 09:13:45 PM »
i think that the viking was underrated.  The indian one i could go either way with.  knights v. pirate could be interesting though.  I want to see how the factor in the gun.

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2009, 09:28:58 PM »
im starting to see a pattern with the winners of that show, it seems like they want the more technique oriented warrior to win over the more brutal,stronger warrior. i still cant believe they picked the apache over the gladiator acouple episodes ago, i know afew may disagree but imo the gladiator would make chopped meat out of the apache. like i said before, the apache would prolly have the advantage if it was night time in the woods and used ambush techniques which the apache are masters at. but a straight up fight in daylight, the apache is done
R

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2009, 09:33:39 PM »
i think that the viking was underrated.  The indian one i could go either way with.  knights v. pirate could be interesting though.  I want to see how the factor in the gun.
ya me too

alot of good episodes it looks like, yakuza vs. mafia should be a good one, Green Beret vs. Spetznaz, William Wallace vs. Shaka Zulu.

This is a pretty sweet show id like it though if they had the winner go head to head until only one is left, youd have to seperate them by weapon types or something but that would be pretty sweet.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2009, 09:38:34 PM »
im starting to see a pattern with the winners of that show, it seems like they want the more technique oriented warrior to win over the more brutal,stronger warrior. i still cant believe they picked the apache over the gladiator acouple episodes ago, i know afew may disagree but imo the gladiator would make chopped meat out of the apache. like i said before, the apache would prolly have the advantage if it was night time in the woods and used ambush techniques which the apache are masters at. but a straight up fight in daylight, the apache is done
i think it comes down to range, the gladiator didnt have any long range weapons and had very little armor, the apache could have probably gotten 3 or 4 shots off by the time the gladiator was able to close the distance. Even if he hit him once that would be a big deal even if it didnt kill him. Same thing with the samurai i think that the software they have really gives the advantage to the person who has the most range which i think is pretty reasonable.

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2009, 09:39:36 PM »
ya me too

alot of good episodes it looks like, yakuza vs. mafia should be a good one, Green Beret vs. Spetznaz, William Wallace vs. Shaka Zulu.

This is a pretty sweet show id like it though if they had the winner go head to head until only one is left, youd have to seperate them by weapon types or something but that would be pretty sweet.

mob wars, neat.  yakuza are nasty, but mobster love there guns lol.  I think a head to head face off is a good idea.  Maybe you would have to do it by era.  Not sure, becuase as you get more advaced there is nothing that would stop modern warriors.  eapons are to great.  It's not like you can pit a sniper versus an archer.

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2009, 04:15:12 PM »
mob wars,,,,, russian are all ex kgb... no contest..

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Deadliest warrior ninja v spartan
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2009, 09:03:15 PM »
mob wars,,,,, russian are all ex kgb... no contest..

Agreed 1000%, also Spetznas would destroy the Green Beret's /Rangers

and I thought the samurai vs. viking was complete B.S, out of those two geeks judging them one of them kept leaning towards the viking, as did the evidence, and in the end it wasn't even used in the tally or cared for because the main geek kept saying 'samurai' like he had the final word or something..
!?!?